Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-02-16DOI: 10.1177/23969873251320449
Aurora Semerano, Beatrice Dell'Acqua, Angela Genchi, Francesca Sanvito, Ghil Schwarz, Manuel Alejandro Montano Castillo, Andrea Bergamaschi, Michela Sampaolo, Erica Butti, Giorgia Serena Gullotta, Mariangela Piano, Marco Ripa, Paolo Scarpellini, Andrea Falini, Pietro Panni, Elio Clemente Agostoni, Nicola Clementi, Guillaume Saliou, Steven David Hajdu, Luisa Roveri, Patrik Michel, Gianvito Martino, Massimo Filippi, Davide Strambo, Marco Bacigaluppi
Introduction: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening condition and a rare cause of ischemic stroke (IS). This study aimed to evaluate the utility of analyzing cerebral thrombi, obtained through endovascular thrombectomy in IS, for the pathological diagnosis of IE.
Patients and methods: Cerebral thrombi from three groups of IS patients were compared: definite IE (n = 10), cardioembolic stroke without and with concomitant infection (CE-I-: n = 30, CE-I+: n = 10). We performed histological examination, molecular biology, and microbiological tests on cerebral thrombi, to detect microorganisms and assess their composition.
Results: Median age of included patients was 73 years and 50% were females. Hematoxylin & Eosin and Grocott-Gomori Methenamine Silver stains detected microorganisms in all IE cerebral thrombi, and none in the control groups. Thrombus PCR detected relevant microorganism in n = 2/7 IE. Compared to control groups, IE thrombi were characterized by significant lower content of red blood cells (median [IQR]: IE = 7.4 [4.2-26.7], CE-I- = 49.3 [17-62.6], CE-I+ = 57.5 [40.7-60.8], % over thrombus section area [%TSA], p = 0.001), increased von Willebrand Factor (IE = 23.9 [19.1-32], CE-I- = 11.2 [8.2-12.8], CE-I+ = 12.9 [10.7-18.3], %TSA, p = 0.001), cell-dominant pattern of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (IE = 100%, CE-I- = 69%, CE-I+ = 70%, p ⩽ 0.001), and more frequent sub-acute or chronic thrombus age classification (p ⩽ 0.001). These latter thrombus features displayed good discriminative ability between IE and controls, with AUC values between 0.84 and 0.95.
Discussion: Multimodal analysis of cerebral thrombi in IS with suspected IE supports early and definite pathological diagnosis by detecting pathogens and assessing changes in thrombus composition.
{"title":"Cerebral thrombus analysis as a useful diagnostic tool for infective endocarditis in ischemic stroke patients.","authors":"Aurora Semerano, Beatrice Dell'Acqua, Angela Genchi, Francesca Sanvito, Ghil Schwarz, Manuel Alejandro Montano Castillo, Andrea Bergamaschi, Michela Sampaolo, Erica Butti, Giorgia Serena Gullotta, Mariangela Piano, Marco Ripa, Paolo Scarpellini, Andrea Falini, Pietro Panni, Elio Clemente Agostoni, Nicola Clementi, Guillaume Saliou, Steven David Hajdu, Luisa Roveri, Patrik Michel, Gianvito Martino, Massimo Filippi, Davide Strambo, Marco Bacigaluppi","doi":"10.1177/23969873251320449","DOIUrl":"10.1177/23969873251320449","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening condition and a rare cause of ischemic stroke (IS). This study aimed to evaluate the utility of analyzing cerebral thrombi, obtained through endovascular thrombectomy in IS, for the pathological diagnosis of IE.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Cerebral thrombi from three groups of IS patients were compared: definite IE (<i>n</i> = 10), cardioembolic stroke without and with concomitant infection (CE-I<sup>-</sup>: <i>n</i> = 30, CE-I<sup>+</sup>: <i>n</i> = 10). We performed histological examination, molecular biology, and microbiological tests on cerebral thrombi, to detect microorganisms and assess their composition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age of included patients was 73 years and 50% were females. Hematoxylin & Eosin and Grocott-Gomori Methenamine Silver stains detected microorganisms in all IE cerebral thrombi, and none in the control groups. Thrombus PCR detected relevant microorganism in n = 2/7 IE. Compared to control groups, IE thrombi were characterized by significant lower content of red blood cells (median [IQR]: IE = 7.4 [4.2-26.7], CE-I<sup>-</sup> = 49.3 [17-62.6], CE-I<sup>+</sup> = 57.5 [40.7-60.8], % over thrombus section area [%TSA], <i>p</i> = 0.001), increased von Willebrand Factor (IE = 23.9 [19.1-32], CE-I<sup>-</sup> = 11.2 [8.2-12.8], CE-I<sup>+</sup> = 12.9 [10.7-18.3], %TSA, <i>p</i> = 0.001), cell-dominant pattern of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (IE = 100%, CE-I<sup>-</sup> = 69%, CE-I<sup>+</sup> = 70%, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001), and more frequent sub-acute or chronic thrombus age classification (<i>p</i> ⩽ 0.001). These latter thrombus features displayed good discriminative ability between IE and controls, with AUC values between 0.84 and 0.95.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Multimodal analysis of cerebral thrombi in IS with suspected IE supports early and definite pathological diagnosis by detecting pathogens and assessing changes in thrombus composition.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"929-939"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831614/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143434280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: The degree of culprit artery stenosis affects the risk of early neurological deterioration (END) after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The TREND trial demonstrated the efficacy of tirofiban in preventing END in patients with AIS. We aimed to investigate whether the degree of intracranial artery stenosis affects the efficacy of tirofiban in preventing END in patients with AIS.
Patients and methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the TREND trial, which enrolled patients within 24 h of onset and randomly allocated to receive intravenous tirofiban or oral aspirin. We stratified the stenosis degrees into three subgroups: no stenosis, mild-to-moderate stenosis (stenosis <70%), and severe stenosis or occlusion (stenosis ⩾70%). The primary endpoint is END4 defined as an increase of the NIHSS ⩾4 within 72 h after randomization. Secondary outcomes include END2 (defined as an increase of NIHSS ⩾2) within 72 h after randomization, the proportion of mRS 0-1 and 0-2 at 90 days.
Results: A total of 296 patients were analyzed. In patients with severe stenosis or occlusion, tirofiban significantly reduced the incidence of END4 (5.7% vs 30.8%, adjusted OR 0.156, 95% CI 0.028-0.873, adjusted p = 0.034), whereas its effects in preventing END4 were similar to those of aspirin in patients with no stenosis (2.4% vs 4.6%, adjusted OR 0.193, 95% CI 0.018-2.083, adjusted p = 0.175) or mild-to-moderate stenosis (2.9% vs 10.0%, adjusted OR 0.171, 95% CI 0.015-1.943, adjusted p = 0.155). The p value for interaction between stenosis subgroups and treatment was 0.513. Furthermore, tirofiban significantly reduced the incidence of END2 in patients with mild-to-moderate stenosis (5.9% vs 22.5%, OR 0.146, 95% CI 0.022-0.951, adjusted p = 0.044) and severe stenosis or occlusion (11.4% vs 43.6%, adjusted OR 0.140, 95% CI 0.036-0.540, adjusted p = 0.004). A significant improvement in favorable outcomes with a 90-day mRS of 0-1 was observed only in patients with mild-to-moderate stenosis (85.3% vs 70.0%, adjusted OR 4.617, 95% CI 1.077-19.798, adjusted p = 0.039).
Discussion and conclusion: Tirofiban may significantly reduce the incidence of END in patients with severe arterial stenosis or occlusion. Further studies are required to confirm the effects of intracranial artery stenosis on the benefits of intravenous tirofiban.
主犯动脉狭窄程度影响急性缺血性卒中(AIS)后早期神经功能恶化(END)的风险。TREND试验证实了替罗非班在AIS患者中预防END的有效性。我们的目的是研究颅内动脉狭窄程度是否影响替罗非班预防AIS患者END的疗效。患者和方法:我们对TREND试验进行了事后分析,该试验在发病24小时内招募患者,并随机分配接受静脉注射替罗非班或口服阿司匹林。我们将狭窄程度分为三个亚组:无狭窄,轻度至中度狭窄(狭窄4定义为随机化后72小时内NIHSS小于或等于4的增加)。次要结局包括随机化后72小时内的END2(定义为NIHSS大于或等于2的增加),90天mRS 0-1和0-2的比例。结果:共分析296例患者。在严重狭窄或闭塞的患者中,替罗非班显著降低了END4的发生率(5.7% vs 30.8%,校正or 0.156, 95% CI 0.028-0.873,校正p = 0.034),而在无狭窄患者中,替罗非班预防END4的效果与阿司匹林相似(2.4% vs 4.6%,校正or 0.193, 95% CI 0.018-2.083,校正p = 0.175)或轻度至中度狭窄(2.9% vs 10.0%,校正or 0.171, 95% CI 0.015-1.943,校正p = 0.155)。狭窄亚组与治疗相互作用的p值为0.513。此外,替罗非班显著降低了轻度至中度狭窄(5.9% vs 22.5%, OR 0.146, 95% CI 0.022-0.951,校正p = 0.044)和重度狭窄或闭塞(11.4% vs 43.6%,校正OR 0.140, 95% CI 0.036-0.540,校正p = 0.004)患者的END2发生率。仅在轻度至中度狭窄患者中观察到90天mRS为0-1的有利结果的显著改善(85.3% vs 70.0%,调整OR为4.617,95% CI为1.077-19.798,调整p = 0.039)。讨论与结论:替罗非班可显著降低严重动脉狭窄或闭塞患者的END发生率。需要进一步的研究来证实颅内动脉狭窄对静脉注射替罗非班益处的影响。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov;标识符:NCT04491695。
{"title":"Effects of tirofiban in preventing neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke with intracranial artery stenosis: A post hoc analysis of the TREND Trial.","authors":"Jing Wang, Yue Qiao, Sijie Li, Chuanhui Li, Chuanjie Wu, Pingping Wang, Ting Yang, Xunming Ji, Qingfeng Ma, Wenbo Zhao","doi":"10.1177/23969873251319151","DOIUrl":"10.1177/23969873251319151","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The degree of culprit artery stenosis affects the risk of early neurological deterioration (END) after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The TREND trial demonstrated the efficacy of tirofiban in preventing END in patients with AIS. We aimed to investigate whether the degree of intracranial artery stenosis affects the efficacy of tirofiban in preventing END in patients with AIS.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a post hoc analysis of the TREND trial, which enrolled patients within 24 h of onset and randomly allocated to receive intravenous tirofiban or oral aspirin. We stratified the stenosis degrees into three subgroups: no stenosis, mild-to-moderate stenosis (stenosis <70%), and severe stenosis or occlusion (stenosis ⩾70%). The primary endpoint is END<sub>4</sub> defined as an increase of the NIHSS ⩾4 within 72 h after randomization. Secondary outcomes include END<sub>2</sub> (defined as an increase of NIHSS ⩾2) within 72 h after randomization, the proportion of mRS 0-1 and 0-2 at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 296 patients were analyzed. In patients with severe stenosis or occlusion, tirofiban significantly reduced the incidence of END<sub>4</sub> (5.7% vs 30.8%, adjusted OR 0.156, 95% CI 0.028-0.873, adjusted <i>p</i> = 0.034), whereas its effects in preventing END<sub>4</sub> were similar to those of aspirin in patients with no stenosis (2.4% vs 4.6%, adjusted OR 0.193, 95% CI 0.018-2.083, adjusted <i>p</i> = 0.175) or mild-to-moderate stenosis (2.9% vs 10.0%, adjusted OR 0.171, 95% CI 0.015-1.943, adjusted <i>p</i> = 0.155). The <i>p</i> value for interaction between stenosis subgroups and treatment was 0.513. Furthermore, tirofiban significantly reduced the incidence of END<sub>2</sub> in patients with mild-to-moderate stenosis (5.9% vs 22.5%, OR 0.146, 95% CI 0.022-0.951, adjusted <i>p</i> = 0.044) and severe stenosis or occlusion (11.4% vs 43.6%, adjusted OR 0.140, 95% CI 0.036-0.540, adjusted <i>p</i> = 0.004). A significant improvement in favorable outcomes with a 90-day mRS of 0-1 was observed only in patients with mild-to-moderate stenosis (85.3% vs 70.0%, adjusted OR 4.617, 95% CI 1.077-19.798, adjusted <i>p</i> = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Tirofiban may significantly reduce the incidence of END in patients with severe arterial stenosis or occlusion. Further studies are required to confirm the effects of intracranial artery stenosis on the benefits of intravenous tirofiban.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier: NCT04491695.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"919-928"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829278/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143415818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-03-13DOI: 10.1177/23969873251325076
Melanie Hafdi, Martin Taylor-Rowan, Bogna Drozdowska, Emma Elliott, Lucy McGuire, Edo Richard, Terence J Quinn
Introduction: A better understanding of who will develop dementia can inform patient care. Although MRI offers prognostic insights, access is limited globally, whereas CT-imaging is readily available in acute stroke. We explored the prognostic utility of acute CT-imaging for predicting dementia.
Patients and methods: We included stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) survivors from participating stroke centres in Scotland. Acute CT-scans were rated using ordinal scales for neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular changes (old infarcts, white matter lesions (WMLs), medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA), and global atrophy (GA)) and combined together to a 'brain-frailty' score. Dementia status was established at 18-months following stroke or TIA.
Results: Among 195 participants, 33% had dementia after 3 years of follow-up. High brain-frailty score (⩾2/4) correlated with higher risk of dementia (HR (95% CI) 6.02 (1.89-19.21)). As individual predictor, severe MTA was most strongly associated with dementia (adjusted HR (95% CI) 2.09 (1.07-4.08)). Other predictors associated with dementia included older age, higher prestroke morbidity (mRS), WMLs, and GA. Integrated in a prediction model with clinical parameters, prestroke mRS, cardiovascular disease, GA, MTA and Abbreviated-Mental-Test were the strongest predictors of dementia (c-statistic: 0.77).
Discussion and conclusion: Increased brain-frailty, and its individual components (WMLs, MTA, and GA) are associated with a higher risk of dementia in participants with stroke. Combining clinical and brain-frailty parameters created a moderate dementia prediction model but added little value over clinical parameters in combination with cognitive testing. CT-based brain-frailty may provide better prognostic insights when cognitive testing isn't feasible and for identifying highest-risk individuals for dementia prevention trials to increase trial efficiency.
{"title":"Prediction of dementia using CT imaging in stroke (PRODUCTS).","authors":"Melanie Hafdi, Martin Taylor-Rowan, Bogna Drozdowska, Emma Elliott, Lucy McGuire, Edo Richard, Terence J Quinn","doi":"10.1177/23969873251325076","DOIUrl":"10.1177/23969873251325076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A better understanding of who will develop dementia can inform patient care. Although MRI offers prognostic insights, access is limited globally, whereas CT-imaging is readily available in acute stroke. We explored the prognostic utility of acute CT-imaging for predicting dementia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We included stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) survivors from participating stroke centres in Scotland. Acute CT-scans were rated using ordinal scales for neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular changes (old infarcts, white matter lesions (WMLs), medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA), and global atrophy (GA)) and combined together to a 'brain-frailty' score. Dementia status was established at 18-months following stroke or TIA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 195 participants, 33% had dementia after 3 years of follow-up. High brain-frailty score (⩾2/4) correlated with higher risk of dementia (HR (95% CI) 6.02 (1.89-19.21)). As individual predictor, severe MTA was most strongly associated with dementia (adjusted HR (95% CI) 2.09 (1.07-4.08)). Other predictors associated with dementia included older age, higher prestroke morbidity (mRS), WMLs, and GA. Integrated in a prediction model with clinical parameters, prestroke mRS, cardiovascular disease, GA, MTA and Abbreviated-Mental-Test were the strongest predictors of dementia (c-statistic: 0.77).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Increased brain-frailty, and its individual components (WMLs, MTA, and GA) are associated with a higher risk of dementia in participants with stroke. Combining clinical and brain-frailty parameters created a moderate dementia prediction model but added little value over clinical parameters in combination with cognitive testing. CT-based brain-frailty may provide better prognostic insights when cognitive testing isn't feasible and for identifying highest-risk individuals for dementia prevention trials to increase trial efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"978-987"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907507/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143617350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2024-12-10DOI: 10.1177/23969873241304305
Miranda Nybondas, Nicolas Martinez-Majander, Peter Ringleb, Matthias Ungerer, Christoph Gumbinger, Simon Trüssel, Valerian Altersberger, Jan F Scheitz, Regina von Rennenberg, Christoph Riegler, Charlotte Cordonnier, Andrea Zini, Guido Bigliardi, Francesca Rosafio, Patrik Michel, Nabila Wali, Paul J Nederkoorn, Mirjam Heldner, Marialuisa Zedde, Rosario Pascarella, Visnja Padjen, Ivana Berisavac, Yannick Béjot, Jukka Putaala, Gerli Sibolt, Marjaana Tiainen, Laura Mannismäki, Tuomas Mertsalmi, Elina Myller, Alessandro Pezzini, Ronen R Leker, Georg Kägi, Susanne Wegener, Carlo W Cereda, Annika Nordanstig, George Ntaios, Christian H Nolte, Henrik Gensicke, Stefan T Engelter, Sami Curtze
Background and aims: Previous observational data indicate that young adults treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke have more favorable outcomes and less complications when compared to older adults. Given the limited data on this topic, we aimed to provide more evidence on clinical outcomes and safety in such patients, using a large international thrombolysis registry.
Methods: In this prospective multicenter study, we used data from the Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Patients (TRISP) registry from 1998 to 2020. Patients who received endovascular treatment (EVT), as only treatment or in addition to IVT, were not included in this cohort. Using multivariable regression models, we compared thrombolysed young patients aged 18-49 years with those aged ⩾50 years with regards to the following outcomes: favorable outcome in stroke survivors (modified Rankin Scale ⩽2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) according to European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II (ECASS II) criteria, and three-months all-cause death.
Results: Of the 16,651 IVT treated patients, 1346 (8.1%) were 18-49 years. Young adults in TRISP were more often male (59.6% vs 54.0%), had a lower median NIHSS score on admission, 7 (4-13) versus 8 (5-15), and had less cardiovascular risk factors except for smoking (42.0% vs 19.0%) when compared to older patients. When compared to thrombolysed patients aged ⩾50 years, a favorable functional outcome was more likely in young adults: 81.9% versus 56.4%, aOR 2.30 (1.80-2.95), whilst sICH 1.6% versus 4.6%, aOR 0.45 (0.23-0.90) and death 2.3% versus 14.2%, aOR 0.21 (0.11-0.39) were less likely.
Conclusions: Intravenous thrombolysis in young adults is independently associated with higher rates of favorable outcomes and lower rates of complications.
{"title":"Intravenous thrombolysis in young adults with ischemic stroke: A cohort study from the international TRISP collaboration.","authors":"Miranda Nybondas, Nicolas Martinez-Majander, Peter Ringleb, Matthias Ungerer, Christoph Gumbinger, Simon Trüssel, Valerian Altersberger, Jan F Scheitz, Regina von Rennenberg, Christoph Riegler, Charlotte Cordonnier, Andrea Zini, Guido Bigliardi, Francesca Rosafio, Patrik Michel, Nabila Wali, Paul J Nederkoorn, Mirjam Heldner, Marialuisa Zedde, Rosario Pascarella, Visnja Padjen, Ivana Berisavac, Yannick Béjot, Jukka Putaala, Gerli Sibolt, Marjaana Tiainen, Laura Mannismäki, Tuomas Mertsalmi, Elina Myller, Alessandro Pezzini, Ronen R Leker, Georg Kägi, Susanne Wegener, Carlo W Cereda, Annika Nordanstig, George Ntaios, Christian H Nolte, Henrik Gensicke, Stefan T Engelter, Sami Curtze","doi":"10.1177/23969873241304305","DOIUrl":"10.1177/23969873241304305","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Previous observational data indicate that young adults treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke have more favorable outcomes and less complications when compared to older adults. Given the limited data on this topic, we aimed to provide more evidence on clinical outcomes and safety in such patients, using a large international thrombolysis registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective multicenter study, we used data from the Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Patients (TRISP) registry from 1998 to 2020. Patients who received endovascular treatment (EVT), as only treatment or in addition to IVT, were not included in this cohort. Using multivariable regression models, we compared thrombolysed young patients aged 18-49 years with those aged ⩾50 years with regards to the following outcomes: favorable outcome in stroke survivors (modified Rankin Scale ⩽2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) according to European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II (ECASS II) criteria, and three-months all-cause death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 16,651 IVT treated patients, 1346 (8.1%) were 18-49 years. Young adults in TRISP were more often male (59.6% vs 54.0%), had a lower median NIHSS score on admission, 7 (4-13) versus 8 (5-15), and had less cardiovascular risk factors except for smoking (42.0% vs 19.0%) when compared to older patients. When compared to thrombolysed patients aged ⩾50 years, a favorable functional outcome was more likely in young adults: 81.9% versus 56.4%, aOR 2.30 (1.80-2.95), whilst sICH 1.6% versus 4.6%, aOR 0.45 (0.23-0.90) and death 2.3% versus 14.2%, aOR 0.21 (0.11-0.39) were less likely.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intravenous thrombolysis in young adults is independently associated with higher rates of favorable outcomes and lower rates of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"721-729"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632716/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142802761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.1177/23969873241309516
James Beharry, Vignan Yogendrakumar, Guilherme W F Barros, Stephen M Davis, Bo Norrving, Gemma A Figtree, Geoffrey Donnan, Mia von Euler, Marie Eriksson
Introduction: Little is known of the long-term prognosis of patients with acute ischaemic stroke in the absence of standard modifiable stroke risk factors (SMoRFs). In acute coronary syndromes, patients without modifiable risk factors have a higher mortality rate. We analysed data from the Swedish Stroke Register to determine survival of patients without SMoRFs following an ischaemic stroke.
Patients and methods: We identified adult patients with first-presentation acute ischaemic stroke between 2010 and 2020. Patients were considered to possess a SMoRF if they had one of: hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, atrial fibrillation or an active smoking history. We compared mortality in patients with and without SMoRFs following first-presentation ischaemic stroke using cox regression models. We also assessed the combined endpoint death and dependency (mRS 3-6) at 3 months via logistic regression models.
Results: Of 152,588 patients with ischaemic stroke, hypertension (58.7%) and atrial fibrillation (27.3%) were the most common risk factors. 34,019 patients (22.3%) had no SMoRFs. After a first-presentation ischaemic stroke, patients without SMoRFs had a lower risk of death than patients with one or more SMoRFs (HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.57-0.59]). The absence of SMoRFs was associated with lower odds of death and dependency at 3 months in logistic regression models (OR 0·60 [95% CI 0.58-0.62]).
Conclusion: One in five patients with acute ischaemic stroke had no standard modifiable stroke risk factors. These patients have lower risk of death compared to patients with one or more SMoRFs.
在缺乏标准可改变的卒中危险因素(smorf)的情况下,急性缺血性卒中患者的长期预后知之甚少。在急性冠状动脉综合征中,没有可改变危险因素的患者死亡率更高。我们分析了来自瑞典卒中登记的数据,以确定缺血性卒中后无smorf患者的生存率。患者和方法:我们确定了2010年至2020年间首次出现急性缺血性卒中的成年患者。如果患者有高血压、糖尿病、高脂血症、心房颤动或积极吸烟史,则认为他们具有SMoRF。我们使用cox回归模型比较了首次出现缺血性卒中后伴有和不伴有smorf的患者的死亡率。我们还通过逻辑回归模型评估了3个月时的联合终点死亡和依赖性(mRS 3-6)。结果:152588例缺血性脑卒中患者中,高血压(58.7%)和房颤(27.3%)是最常见的危险因素。34,019例(22.3%)患者无smorf。首次出现缺血性卒中后,无smorf患者的死亡风险低于有一种或多种smorf患者(HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.57-0.59])。在logistic回归模型中,smorf的缺失与3个月时较低的死亡和依赖几率相关(OR 0.60 [95% CI 0.58-0.62])。结论:1 / 5的急性缺血性卒中患者没有标准的可改变的卒中危险因素。与有一个或多个smorf的患者相比,这些患者的死亡风险较低。
{"title":"Mortality in ischaemic stroke patients without standard modifiable risk factors: An analysis of the Riksstroke registry.","authors":"James Beharry, Vignan Yogendrakumar, Guilherme W F Barros, Stephen M Davis, Bo Norrving, Gemma A Figtree, Geoffrey Donnan, Mia von Euler, Marie Eriksson","doi":"10.1177/23969873241309516","DOIUrl":"10.1177/23969873241309516","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Little is known of the long-term prognosis of patients with acute ischaemic stroke in the absence of standard modifiable stroke risk factors (SMoRFs). In acute coronary syndromes, patients without modifiable risk factors have a higher mortality rate. We analysed data from the Swedish Stroke Register to determine survival of patients without SMoRFs following an ischaemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We identified adult patients with first-presentation acute ischaemic stroke between 2010 and 2020. Patients were considered to possess a SMoRF if they had one of: hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, atrial fibrillation or an active smoking history. We compared mortality in patients with and without SMoRFs following first-presentation ischaemic stroke using cox regression models. We also assessed the combined endpoint death and dependency (mRS 3-6) at 3 months via logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 152,588 patients with ischaemic stroke, hypertension (58.7%) and atrial fibrillation (27.3%) were the most common risk factors. 34,019 patients (22.3%) had no SMoRFs. After a first-presentation ischaemic stroke, patients without SMoRFs had a lower risk of death than patients with one or more SMoRFs (HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.57-0.59]). The absence of SMoRFs was associated with lower odds of death and dependency at 3 months in logistic regression models (OR 0·60 [95% CI 0.58-0.62]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One in five patients with acute ischaemic stroke had no standard modifiable stroke risk factors. These patients have lower risk of death compared to patients with one or more SMoRFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"813-821"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694267/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142915885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-01-10DOI: 10.1177/23969873241309506
Carmen Arteaga-Reyes, Dwaipayan Sen, Salvatore Rudilosso, Eric Jouvent, Dominique Hervé, Arne G Lindgren, Joanna M Wardlaw, Susanna Melkas, Fergus N Doubal
Purpose: Cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) is a highly prevalent disorder leading to physical, cognitive and functional decline. We report key barriers in the management of individuals with cSVD, the potential benefit of cSVD-dedicated health services, and evidence from existing models of care for adults with cSVD.
Methods: We examined information from a scientific seminar developed between seven experts in cSVD during the eighth European Stroke Organisation Conference that discussed the optimal health care for adults with cSVD and what health services dedicated to cSVD should include.
Findings: Barriers in cSVD care include unrecognised symptoms and modifiable risk factors, heterogeneity of clinical presentations, inefficient inter/intra-clinical services communication/organisation, and uncertainties regarding what assessments/treatments should be routinely done, when and by whom. However, existing health services and research studies suggest models of care in cSVD. Multi-step approaches can be used for identification and aetiological workup in individuals with cSVD, including basic and selected advanced evaluations, for example, monogenic cSVD testing. Although current guidelines for management of cSVD illlustrate limitations, there are recommendations on risk factors and lifestyle considerations, as well as pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for people with cSVD.
Discussion and conclusion: Existing healthcare models do not provide optimal care for individuals with cSVD. Lack of awareness of heterogeneous clinical presentations and uncertainty in threshold of cSVD 'burden' for referral to specialist multidisciplinary services, are key challenges for health services to overcome. Creating cSVD-dedicated services may prevent underdiagnosing and achieve standardised holistic management to improve outcomes in people with cSVD. However, adequate prevention and early management should be offered at all levels of care.
{"title":"Time to consider health services dedicated for adults living with cerebral small vessel disease: Report of a ESO scientific seminar.","authors":"Carmen Arteaga-Reyes, Dwaipayan Sen, Salvatore Rudilosso, Eric Jouvent, Dominique Hervé, Arne G Lindgren, Joanna M Wardlaw, Susanna Melkas, Fergus N Doubal","doi":"10.1177/23969873241309506","DOIUrl":"10.1177/23969873241309506","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) is a highly prevalent disorder leading to physical, cognitive and functional decline. We report key barriers in the management of individuals with cSVD, the potential benefit of cSVD-dedicated health services, and evidence from existing models of care for adults with cSVD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined information from a scientific seminar developed between seven experts in cSVD during the eighth European Stroke Organisation Conference that discussed the optimal health care for adults with cSVD and what health services dedicated to cSVD should include.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Barriers in cSVD care include unrecognised symptoms and modifiable risk factors, heterogeneity of clinical presentations, inefficient inter/intra-clinical services communication/organisation, and uncertainties regarding what assessments/treatments should be routinely done, when and by whom. However, existing health services and research studies suggest models of care in cSVD. Multi-step approaches can be used for identification and aetiological workup in individuals with cSVD, including basic and selected advanced evaluations, for example, monogenic cSVD testing. Although current guidelines for management of cSVD illlustrate limitations, there are recommendations on risk factors and lifestyle considerations, as well as pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for people with cSVD.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Existing healthcare models do not provide optimal care for individuals with cSVD. Lack of awareness of heterogeneous clinical presentations and uncertainty in threshold of cSVD 'burden' for referral to specialist multidisciplinary services, are key challenges for health services to overcome. Creating cSVD-dedicated services may prevent underdiagnosing and achieve standardised holistic management to improve outcomes in people with cSVD. However, adequate prevention and early management should be offered at all levels of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"675-681"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11719432/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-01-30DOI: 10.1177/23969873251315337
João Pinho, Anna Tyurina, Celina Hartmann, Omar Abu Audeh, Pardes Habib, Ramy Abdelnaby, Oliver Matz, Marc Felzen, Jörg C Brokmann, Martin Wiesmann, Jörg B Schulz, Omid Nikoubashman, Arno Reich
Introduction: Distal arterial occlusions can cause measurable changes in the flow wave profile in proximal segments of the feeding artery. Our objective was to study the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the common carotid arteries (CCA) for detection of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ac-LVO) in patients with suspected stroke.
Patients and methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, observational study of adult patients with suspected stroke admitted in the emergency department. Flow wave profiles of both CCAs were generated by non-specialists using POCUS as soon as possible after admission. ac-LVO was defined as an internal carotid artery or M1 occlusion in CT- or MR-angiography. The diagnostic performances for detection of ac-LVO using flow wave parameters were calculated.
Results: Among 283 patients recruited during a 10-month period, 257 patients (91%) had CCA ultrasound images of sufficient quality and were included for analysis. The mean age was 75 years (IQR 62-83), 131 were female (51.0%), median baseline NIHSS was 2 (IQR 0-5). The most frequent final diagnosis was ischemic stroke (49.4%), ac-LVO was present in 30 patients (11.9%). The median duration of POCUS was 3 min (IQR 2-5). Among all flow wave parameters, the highest diagnostic accuracy for ac-LVO detection was found for end-diastolic velocity difference between sides (AUC = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.85-0.93), with a specificity of 83% (95%CI = 78-88%) at a predefined sensitivity threshold of 80%.
Discussion and conclusion: POCUS of the CCA in patients with suspected stroke can predict the presence of ac-LVO. These results need to be replicated in a prehospital setting.
{"title":"Point-of-care ultrasound of the common carotid arteries for detection of large vessel occlusion stroke: Results of the POCUS-LVO study.","authors":"João Pinho, Anna Tyurina, Celina Hartmann, Omar Abu Audeh, Pardes Habib, Ramy Abdelnaby, Oliver Matz, Marc Felzen, Jörg C Brokmann, Martin Wiesmann, Jörg B Schulz, Omid Nikoubashman, Arno Reich","doi":"10.1177/23969873251315337","DOIUrl":"10.1177/23969873251315337","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Distal arterial occlusions can cause measurable changes in the flow wave profile in proximal segments of the feeding artery. Our objective was to study the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the common carotid arteries (CCA) for detection of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ac-LVO) in patients with suspected stroke.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, single-center, observational study of adult patients with suspected stroke admitted in the emergency department. Flow wave profiles of both CCAs were generated by non-specialists using POCUS as soon as possible after admission. ac-LVO was defined as an internal carotid artery or M1 occlusion in CT- or MR-angiography. The diagnostic performances for detection of ac-LVO using flow wave parameters were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 283 patients recruited during a 10-month period, 257 patients (91%) had CCA ultrasound images of sufficient quality and were included for analysis. The mean age was 75 years (IQR 62-83), 131 were female (51.0%), median baseline NIHSS was 2 (IQR 0-5). The most frequent final diagnosis was ischemic stroke (49.4%), ac-LVO was present in 30 patients (11.9%). The median duration of POCUS was 3 min (IQR 2-5). Among all flow wave parameters, the highest diagnostic accuracy for ac-LVO detection was found for end-diastolic velocity difference between sides (AUC = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.85-0.93), with a specificity of 83% (95%CI = 78-88%) at a predefined sensitivity threshold of 80%.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>POCUS of the CCA in patients with suspected stroke can predict the presence of ac-LVO. These results need to be replicated in a prehospital setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"853-861"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783414/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143068516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-02-16DOI: 10.1177/23969873251319941
Louise Maes, Theodora Van Elk, Anne van der Meij, Femke Roelofs, Kris Bogaerts, Reinoud Ph Bokkers, Gert J de Borst, Heleen M den Hertog, Diederik Wj Dippel, Olivier François, Noémie Ligot, Hester F Lingsma, Charles Blm Majoie, Jo Pp Peluso, Illario Tancredi, Ido R van den Wijngaard, Aad van der Lugt, Laetitia Yperzeele, Clark J Zeebregts, Paul J Nederkoorn, Robin Lemmens, Maarten Uyttenboogaart
Background: The optimal acute management of patients with acute ischemic stroke and a tandem lesion, defined as intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) with concomitant carotid artery stenosis or occlusion, remains unclear. Our aim is to assess the efficacy and safety of immediate carotid artery stenting (CAS) compared to delayed management in patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke due to tandem lesions.
Study design: CASES is a phase 3 multicenter prospective randomized open-label blinded endpoint (PROBE) non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients with a computed tomography angiography proven intracranial LVO in the anterior circulation and ipsilateral proximal carotid artery stenosis (⩾50%) or occlusion of presumed atherosclerotic origin will be randomized to either immediate CAS during EVT or to EVT followed by a deferred strategy, which may include carotid endarterectomy (CEA), CAS, or medical management. CASES will be conducted in 27 EVT centers in Belgium and the Netherlands. A total of 600 patients will be included.
Study outcomes: The primary outcome is the score on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes include excellent (mRS 0-1) and good (mRS 0-2) functional outcome at 90 days, stroke severity measured with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 24 h and 5-7 days, recanalization, infarct volume at 24 h, ischemic stroke recurrence, carotid artery re-occlusion, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality.
Summary: This study will provide high-quality randomized data on the efficacy and safety of immediate CAS in patients undergoing EVT for acute ischemic stroke due to a tandem lesion.
{"title":"Carotid Artery Stenting during Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic Stroke (CASES) study protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Louise Maes, Theodora Van Elk, Anne van der Meij, Femke Roelofs, Kris Bogaerts, Reinoud Ph Bokkers, Gert J de Borst, Heleen M den Hertog, Diederik Wj Dippel, Olivier François, Noémie Ligot, Hester F Lingsma, Charles Blm Majoie, Jo Pp Peluso, Illario Tancredi, Ido R van den Wijngaard, Aad van der Lugt, Laetitia Yperzeele, Clark J Zeebregts, Paul J Nederkoorn, Robin Lemmens, Maarten Uyttenboogaart","doi":"10.1177/23969873251319941","DOIUrl":"10.1177/23969873251319941","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal acute management of patients with acute ischemic stroke and a tandem lesion, defined as intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) with concomitant carotid artery stenosis or occlusion, remains unclear. Our aim is to assess the efficacy and safety of immediate carotid artery stenting (CAS) compared to delayed management in patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke due to tandem lesions.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>CASES is a phase 3 multicenter prospective randomized open-label blinded endpoint (PROBE) non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients with a computed tomography angiography proven intracranial LVO in the anterior circulation and ipsilateral proximal carotid artery stenosis (⩾50%) or occlusion of presumed atherosclerotic origin will be randomized to either immediate CAS during EVT or to EVT followed by a deferred strategy, which may include carotid endarterectomy (CEA), CAS, or medical management. CASES will be conducted in 27 EVT centers in Belgium and the Netherlands. A total of 600 patients will be included.</p><p><strong>Study outcomes: </strong>The primary outcome is the score on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes include excellent (mRS 0-1) and good (mRS 0-2) functional outcome at 90 days, stroke severity measured with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 24 h and 5-7 days, recanalization, infarct volume at 24 h, ischemic stroke recurrence, carotid artery re-occlusion, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This study will provide high-quality randomized data on the efficacy and safety of immediate CAS in patients undergoing EVT for acute ischemic stroke due to a tandem lesion.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06511089; ISRCTN 14956654.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"995-1002"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831615/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143434278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: The efficacy of different antiplatelet treatment in minor strokes (MSs) or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and that of antiplatelet and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in MSs remain controversial.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library to identify all eligible articles until April 12, 2024. Efficacy outcomes were all-cause mortality, excellent outcome, functional independence and recurrent stroke. Safety outcomes were any types of bleeding and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The associations were calculated for the overall data by using odds ratios (ORs).
Results: Twenty three high-quality studies with 10 RCTs and 13 non-RCTs were included, involving 47,135 patients with MSs or TIAs. In MSs or TIAs, dual antiplatelet therapies (DAPTs) significantly improved the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores for patients with recurrent stroke, major vascular events and ischemic stroke although it was associated with an increased risk of ICH and bleeding when compared to aspirin. In MSs, compared to IVT, DAPT had a significant advantage in improving the mRMS scores and SAPT and DAPT significantly reduced the risk of any bleeding or sICH. IVT significantly reduced all-cause mortality, although it also increased the risk of sICH and ICH compared to no IVT.
Conclusions: In MSs or TIAs, compared to aspirin, DAPTs can effectively prevent the recurrence of post-stroke neurological dysfunction and ischemic events, but it may increase the risk of ICH together with moderate or severe bleeding. Dipyridamole + aspirin resulted in the lowest risk of bleeding. In MSs, compared to IVT, DAPT may be associated with better improvements in neurological function, and it may not increase the risk of bleeding.
简介:不同抗血小板治疗方法对轻度脑卒中(MSs)或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIAs)的疗效以及MSs抗血小板和静脉溶栓(IVT)的疗效仍存在争议。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library,确定2024年4月12日前所有符合条件的文章。疗效指标为全因死亡率、良好预后、功能独立性和卒中复发。安全性结局为任何类型的出血和脑出血(ICH)。使用比值比(ORs)计算总体数据的相关性。结果:纳入23项高质量研究,包括10项随机对照试验和13项非随机对照试验,共纳入47,135例MSs或tia患者。在MSs或TIAs中,双重抗血小板治疗(DAPTs)显著提高了复发性卒中、主要血管事件和缺血性卒中患者的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分,尽管与阿司匹林相比,它与脑出血和出血的风险增加有关。在MSs中,与IVT相比,DAPT在提高mRMS评分方面具有显著优势,SAPT和DAPT显著降低了任何出血或sICH的风险。IVT显著降低了全因死亡率,尽管与未IVT相比,IVT也增加了siich和ICH的风险。结论:在MSs或tia患者中,与阿司匹林相比,DAPTs可有效预防脑卒中后神经功能障碍和缺血性事件的复发,但可能增加脑出血并中重度出血的风险。双嘧达莫+阿司匹林导致出血风险最低。在MSs中,与IVT相比,DAPT可能与更好的神经功能改善相关,并且可能不会增加出血的风险。
{"title":"Acute treatment and secondary prevention for patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.","authors":"Sitong Guo, Shiran Qin, Dandan Xu, Chunxia Chen, Xiaoyu Chen","doi":"10.1177/23969873241303686","DOIUrl":"10.1177/23969873241303686","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The efficacy of different antiplatelet treatment in minor strokes (MSs) or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and that of antiplatelet and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in MSs remain controversial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library to identify all eligible articles until April 12, 2024. Efficacy outcomes were all-cause mortality, excellent outcome, functional independence and recurrent stroke. Safety outcomes were any types of bleeding and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The associations were calculated for the overall data by using odds ratios (ORs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty three high-quality studies with 10 RCTs and 13 non-RCTs were included, involving 47,135 patients with MSs or TIAs. In MSs or TIAs, dual antiplatelet therapies (DAPTs) significantly improved the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores for patients with recurrent stroke, major vascular events and ischemic stroke although it was associated with an increased risk of ICH and bleeding when compared to aspirin. In MSs, compared to IVT, DAPT had a significant advantage in improving the mRMS scores and SAPT and DAPT significantly reduced the risk of any bleeding or sICH. IVT significantly reduced all-cause mortality, although it also increased the risk of sICH and ICH compared to no IVT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In MSs or TIAs, compared to aspirin, DAPTs can effectively prevent the recurrence of post-stroke neurological dysfunction and ischemic events, but it may increase the risk of ICH together with moderate or severe bleeding. Dipyridamole + aspirin resulted in the lowest risk of bleeding. In MSs, compared to IVT, DAPT may be associated with better improvements in neurological function, and it may not increase the risk of bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"682-693"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607710/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142755557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-01-04DOI: 10.1177/23969873241311331
Angelo Cascio Rizzo, Ghil Schwarz, Andrea Bonelli, Andrea Magi, Elio Clemente Agostoni, Antonella Moreo, Maria Sessa
Background: Severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction [EF] < 30%) is a known cardiovascular risk factor and a major cause of cardioembolism. However, less severe forms of LV disease (LVD), such as mild-to-moderate LV dysfunction and LV wall motion abnormalities (LVWMAs), are considered potential minor cardiac sources in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS), but their role is underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of LVD in ESUS and its association with adverse vascular events and mortality.
Methods: Retrospective, single-center study including consecutive ESUS patients admitted from January 2016 to May 2024. LVD was defined as either global systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction 30%-49%) or regional LVWMAs, unrelated to acute or recent (within 4 weeks) myocardial infarction. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses evaluated the association of LVD with a primary composite outcome (including ischemic stroke recurrence, acute coronary events, and all-cause mortality), and its components separately.
Results: Among the 556 ESUS patients (median age 71 years [IQR 60-80], 44.6% female), 95 (17.1%) had LVD, including 51 (53.7%) with reduced LVEF (30%-49%), and 81 (85.3%) presenting LVWMAs. During follow-up (median 30 months), LVD(+) patients had significantly higher rates of the composite outcome (41.0% vs 21.3%, p < 0.001), ischemic stroke recurrence (13.7% vs 5.9%, p = 0.007), acute coronary events (7.4% vs 2.4%, p = 0.012), and all-cause mortality (28.4% vs 15.2%, p = 0.002), compared to LVD(-) patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that LVD independently increased the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (adjusted HR 2.13, 95%CI 1.08-4.24, p = 0.032) and the composite outcome (aHR 1.92, 95%CI 1.27-2.90, p = 0.002), but not acute coronary events (aHR 1.65; 95%CI 0.54-5.01, p = 0.374), or all-cause mortality (aHR 1.62; 95%CI 0.98-2.70, p = 0.062).
Conclusions: LVD is significantly associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke recurrence and adverse outcomes in ESUS patients. These findings highlight the clinical importance of identifying and optimizing LVD management among ESUS to improve long-term outcomes in this population.
背景:重度左室(LV)收缩功能障碍(射血分数[EF])方法:回顾性、单中心研究,纳入2016年1月至2024年5月连续入院的ESUS患者。LVD定义为与急性或近期(4周内)心肌梗死无关的整体收缩功能障碍(左室射血分数30%-49%)或局部左室wma。单因素和多因素Cox回归分析分别评估了LVD与主要复合结局(包括缺血性卒中复发、急性冠状动脉事件和全因死亡率)及其组成部分的相关性。结果:556例ESUS患者(中位年龄71岁[IQR 60-80],女性44.6%)中,95例(17.1%)存在LVD,其中51例(53.7%)LVEF降低(30%-49%),81例(85.3%)存在LVWMAs。在随访期间(中位30个月),与LVD(-)患者相比,LVD(+)患者的复合结局(41.0% vs 21.3%, p p = 0.007)、急性冠状动脉事件(7.4% vs 2.4%, p = 0.012)和全因死亡率(28.4% vs 15.2%, p = 0.002)的发生率显著高于LVD(-)患者。多因素Cox回归分析显示,LVD单独增加缺血性卒中复发的风险(调整HR 2.13, 95%CI 1.08-4.24, p = 0.032)和综合结局(aHR 1.92, 95%CI 1.27-2.90, p = 0.002),但不增加急性冠状动脉事件(aHR 1.65;95%CI 0.54-5.01, p = 0.374)或全因死亡率(aHR 1.62;95%CI 0.98-2.70, p = 0.062)。结论:在ESUS患者中,LVD与缺血性卒中复发风险增加和不良结局显著相关。这些发现强调了在ESUS中识别和优化LVD管理以改善该人群长期预后的临床重要性。
{"title":"Left ventricular disease as a risk factor for adverse outcomes and stroke recurrence in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source.","authors":"Angelo Cascio Rizzo, Ghil Schwarz, Andrea Bonelli, Andrea Magi, Elio Clemente Agostoni, Antonella Moreo, Maria Sessa","doi":"10.1177/23969873241311331","DOIUrl":"10.1177/23969873241311331","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction [EF] < 30%) is a known cardiovascular risk factor and a major cause of cardioembolism. However, less severe forms of LV disease (LVD), such as mild-to-moderate LV dysfunction and LV wall motion abnormalities (LVWMAs), are considered potential minor cardiac sources in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS), but their role is underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of LVD in ESUS and its association with adverse vascular events and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, single-center study including consecutive ESUS patients admitted from January 2016 to May 2024. LVD was defined as either global systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction 30%-49%) or regional LVWMAs, unrelated to acute or recent (within 4 weeks) myocardial infarction. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses evaluated the association of LVD with a primary composite outcome (including ischemic stroke recurrence, acute coronary events, and all-cause mortality), and its components separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 556 ESUS patients (median age 71 years [IQR 60-80], 44.6% female), 95 (17.1%) had LVD, including 51 (53.7%) with reduced LVEF (30%-49%), and 81 (85.3%) presenting LVWMAs. During follow-up (median 30 months), LVD(+) patients had significantly higher rates of the composite outcome (41.0% vs 21.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), ischemic stroke recurrence (13.7% vs 5.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.007), acute coronary events (7.4% vs 2.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.012), and all-cause mortality (28.4% vs 15.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.002), compared to LVD(-) patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that LVD independently increased the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (adjusted HR 2.13, 95%CI 1.08-4.24, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and the composite outcome (aHR 1.92, 95%CI 1.27-2.90, <i>p</i> = 0.002), but not acute coronary events (aHR 1.65; 95%CI 0.54-5.01, <i>p</i> = 0.374), or all-cause mortality (aHR 1.62; 95%CI 0.98-2.70, <i>p</i> = 0.062).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LVD is significantly associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke recurrence and adverse outcomes in ESUS patients. These findings highlight the clinical importance of identifying and optimizing LVD management among ESUS to improve long-term outcomes in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"757-765"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11700389/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}