Timothée Werlé, Florent Wijanto, Emilien Micard, Bailiang Chen, Marine Beaumont, Kevin Janot, Marco Pasi, Joseph Benzakoun, Jean Philippe Cottier, Bertrand Lapergue, Grégoire Boulouis, Fouzi Bala
Introduction: The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to EVT in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) remains debated. We evaluated the association of the susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) with clinical and angiographic outcomes and assessed whether its presence modified the effect of IVT.
Patients and methods: We retrospectively analysed patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion from the multicentre ETIS registry who underwent EVT. Susceptibility vessel sign presence and extent were assessed on MRI and categorised as binary (SVS- vs SVS+) and 3-class (SVS-, SVS+, SVS++) variables. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate associations and interactions between SVS and IVT for the primary (90-day mRS 0-2) and secondary (90-day ordinal mRS and mortality, first-pass expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [eTICI] 2c-3 and final eTICI 2b-3) outcomes.
Results: Among the 1250 patients analysed, 909 were included. Susceptibility vessel sign was present in 84.5% of patients and associated with improved 90-day mRS 0-2: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.03; 95% CI, 1.18-3.46. No interaction between SVS and IVT was observed for clinical outcomes. However, SVS modified the effect of IVT on final TICI 2b-3 (Pinteraction = .03): IVT + EVT was associated with higher odds of successful reperfusion in SVS+ patients (aOR 2.00; 95% CI, 1.28-3.52) but not in SVS- patients (aOR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.16-1.97). In a secondary analysis using 3-class SVS, only SVS++ (larger hyposignal) was significantly associated with better outcomes and showed interaction with IVT for final eTICI 2b-3.
Conclusion: Susceptibility vessel sign, particularly SVS++, was associated with improved clinical outcomes and enhanced the effect of IVT on reperfusion success in EVT-treated AIS.
{"title":"Does the susceptibility vessel sign influence the effectiveness of intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke?","authors":"Timothée Werlé, Florent Wijanto, Emilien Micard, Bailiang Chen, Marine Beaumont, Kevin Janot, Marco Pasi, Joseph Benzakoun, Jean Philippe Cottier, Bertrand Lapergue, Grégoire Boulouis, Fouzi Bala","doi":"10.1093/esj/aakaf003","DOIUrl":"10.1093/esj/aakaf003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to EVT in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) remains debated. We evaluated the association of the susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) with clinical and angiographic outcomes and assessed whether its presence modified the effect of IVT.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion from the multicentre ETIS registry who underwent EVT. Susceptibility vessel sign presence and extent were assessed on MRI and categorised as binary (SVS- vs SVS+) and 3-class (SVS-, SVS+, SVS++) variables. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate associations and interactions between SVS and IVT for the primary (90-day mRS 0-2) and secondary (90-day ordinal mRS and mortality, first-pass expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [eTICI] 2c-3 and final eTICI 2b-3) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1250 patients analysed, 909 were included. Susceptibility vessel sign was present in 84.5% of patients and associated with improved 90-day mRS 0-2: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.03; 95% CI, 1.18-3.46. No interaction between SVS and IVT was observed for clinical outcomes. However, SVS modified the effect of IVT on final TICI 2b-3 (Pinteraction = .03): IVT + EVT was associated with higher odds of successful reperfusion in SVS+ patients (aOR 2.00; 95% CI, 1.28-3.52) but not in SVS- patients (aOR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.16-1.97). In a secondary analysis using 3-class SVS, only SVS++ (larger hyposignal) was significantly associated with better outcomes and showed interaction with IVT for final eTICI 2b-3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Susceptibility vessel sign, particularly SVS++, was associated with improved clinical outcomes and enhanced the effect of IVT on reperfusion success in EVT-treated AIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12866273/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/esj/23969873251370992
Fabian Wenz, Tamara Wiedemann, Gabriel J E Rinkel, Nima Etminan
Introduction: Flow-diverting (FD) stents are increasingly used to treat small, unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA), but high-quality, unbiased data on initial complications and clinical outcomes were limited in previous literature reviews. We updated the literature review to assess quality, potential bias, complications and short-term outcomes in studies on FD-stents for UIAs.
Patients and methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library until January 9, 2025 for studies on FD-stents for UIAs. We assessed methodological quality using the methodological index for non-randomised studies (poor: 0-9, moderate: 10-13, good: 14-16), and financial conflicts of interest. The primary outcome was neurological outcome according to a validated outcome scale at 1-3 months after treatment. Secondary outcomes were clinical worsening and complications.
Results: We included 13 studies with 743 patients and 806 UIAs, of which 88.4% (95% CI: 85.7%-91.2%) were <10 mm. All studies were uncontrolled. The methodological quality was poor in six and moderate in seven studies. Financial conflicts of interest were reported in six studies. At 1-3 months after treatment, the proportion of patients were for mRS ⩾1 13.3% (95% CI: 10.0%-16.6%), mRS ⩾2 5.3% (95% CI: 3.2%-7.5%), mRS ⩾3 2.4% (95% CI: 0.1%-3.9%) and neurological worsening 3.1% (95% CI: 1.5%-4.6%). Complications within 3 months occurred in 12.7% (95% CI: 10.3%-15.0%).
Discussion and conclusion: The literature on FD-stents is methodologically weak and potentially biased by financial interests but still shows relevant proportions of complications and post-treatment morbidity. Currently, there are no good data supporting the use of FD-stents for UIAs where standard treatment options are available. Randomised-controlled trials are needed to compare safety, efficacy and durability between FD-stents and coiling or clipping.
{"title":"Flow diverter treatment for saccular unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review focussing on study quality and initial outcomes.","authors":"Fabian Wenz, Tamara Wiedemann, Gabriel J E Rinkel, Nima Etminan","doi":"10.1093/esj/23969873251370992","DOIUrl":"10.1093/esj/23969873251370992","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Flow-diverting (FD) stents are increasingly used to treat small, unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA), but high-quality, unbiased data on initial complications and clinical outcomes were limited in previous literature reviews. We updated the literature review to assess quality, potential bias, complications and short-term outcomes in studies on FD-stents for UIAs.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library until January 9, 2025 for studies on FD-stents for UIAs. We assessed methodological quality using the methodological index for non-randomised studies (poor: 0-9, moderate: 10-13, good: 14-16), and financial conflicts of interest. The primary outcome was neurological outcome according to a validated outcome scale at 1-3 months after treatment. Secondary outcomes were clinical worsening and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 13 studies with 743 patients and 806 UIAs, of which 88.4% (95% CI: 85.7%-91.2%) were <10 mm. All studies were uncontrolled. The methodological quality was poor in six and moderate in seven studies. Financial conflicts of interest were reported in six studies. At 1-3 months after treatment, the proportion of patients were for mRS ⩾1 13.3% (95% CI: 10.0%-16.6%), mRS ⩾2 5.3% (95% CI: 3.2%-7.5%), mRS ⩾3 2.4% (95% CI: 0.1%-3.9%) and neurological worsening 3.1% (95% CI: 1.5%-4.6%). Complications within 3 months occurred in 12.7% (95% CI: 10.3%-15.0%).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The literature on FD-stents is methodologically weak and potentially biased by financial interests but still shows relevant proportions of complications and post-treatment morbidity. Currently, there are no good data supporting the use of FD-stents for UIAs where standard treatment options are available. Randomised-controlled trials are needed to compare safety, efficacy and durability between FD-stents and coiling or clipping.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12866275/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/esj/23969873251379985
Philipp Baumgartner, Malin Zahn, Hannah-Lea Handelsmann, Kevin Geier, Sara Petrus, Martin Hänsel, Konstantin Mayr, Theodor Pipping, Andreas R Luft, Lisa Herzog, Susanne Wegener
Background: Intracranial hypertension (IH) from brain edema is a life-threatening complication of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke, yet clinical monitoring is often unreliable. Non-invasive methods for early IH prediction are needed. This study assessed whether sonographic measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) could improve the prediction of IH after stroke.
Patients and methods: We prospectively measured the internal optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSDint) via transorbital ultrasound in 65 stroke patients and 30 controls. ONSD was also measured on the initial CT or MRI. The primary endpoint of IH was a composite of clinical and radiological signs of brain swelling. A predictive ONSD cut-off was determined from a multivariable logistic regression model, adjusted for age and infarct volume. Predictive performance was assessed using leave-one-out cross-validation.
Results: Seven of 65 stroke patients (11%) developed IH. The initial sonographic ONSDint was significantly increased in patients who developed IH. The multivariable model identified an optimal predictive cut-off of ⩾5.51 mm, which predicted IH with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 94.8%. In comparison, ONSD derived from initial neuroimaging was also a strong predictor, with an optimal cut-off of 6.80 mm yielding a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 91.1%, and showed superior predictive accuracy in the cross-validation (AUC 0.905 vs 0.687).
Discussion: Our sonographic ONSDint cut-off of ≥5.51 mm aligns well with recent stroke literature that used similar standardized measurement techniques. Our findings also highlight the distinct roles of different imaging modalities. While the initial CT/MRI provides a static measurement with high predictive power, the unique advantage of sonography is its bedside applicability, allowing for the crucial, non-invasive serial monitoring of ONSD as a dynamic marker of intracranial pressure changes.
Conclusion: Early ONSD assessment is a valuable predictor of IH after severe stroke. A sonographic ONSDint of ⩾5.51 mm identifies patients at high risk with excellent accuracy. While initial neuroimaging may offer superior predictive power, bedside sonography remains a crucial, repeatable tool for monitoring these critically ill patients.
背景:脑水肿引起的颅内高压(IH)是大血管闭塞(LVO)脑卒中的一种危及生命的并发症,但临床监测往往不可靠。需要非侵入性方法进行早期IH预测。本研究评估超声测量视神经鞘直径(ONSD)是否可以提高脑卒中后IH的预测。患者和方法:我们通过经眶超声前瞻性地测量了65例脑卒中患者和30例对照组的视神经鞘内径(ONSDint)。在初始CT或MRI上也测量了ONSD。IH的主要终点是脑肿胀的临床和影像学征象的综合。根据年龄和梗死体积调整后的多变量logistic回归模型确定预测ONSD截止值。使用留一交叉验证评估预测性能。结果:65例脑卒中患者中有7例(11%)发生IH。在发生IH的患者中,初始超声ONSDint显著增加。多变量模型确定了小于或等于5.51 mm的最佳预测截止值,其预测IH的灵敏度为85.7%,特异性为94.8%。相比之下,由初始神经影像学得出的ONSD也是一个强有力的预测指标,最佳截止值为6.80 mm,灵敏度为100%,特异性为91.1%,并且在交叉验证中显示出更高的预测准确性(AUC为0.905 vs 0.687)。讨论:我们的超声onsdt截止值≥5.51 mm与最近使用类似标准化测量技术的中风文献很好地吻合。我们的发现也强调了不同成像方式的不同作用。虽然最初的CT/MRI提供了具有高预测能力的静态测量,但超声的独特优势在于它的床边适用性,允许对ONSD进行关键的、无创的串行监测,作为颅内压变化的动态标记。结论:早期ONSD评估是严重脑卒中后IH的一个有价值的预测指标。超声ONSDint小于5.51 mm以极好的准确性识别高风险患者。虽然最初的神经成像可能提供优越的预测能力,但床边超声检查仍然是监测这些危重患者的关键、可重复的工具。
{"title":"Optic nerve sheath diameter for prediction of intracranial hypertension after ischemic sTrokE - The ONSITE study.","authors":"Philipp Baumgartner, Malin Zahn, Hannah-Lea Handelsmann, Kevin Geier, Sara Petrus, Martin Hänsel, Konstantin Mayr, Theodor Pipping, Andreas R Luft, Lisa Herzog, Susanne Wegener","doi":"10.1093/esj/23969873251379985","DOIUrl":"10.1093/esj/23969873251379985","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracranial hypertension (IH) from brain edema is a life-threatening complication of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke, yet clinical monitoring is often unreliable. Non-invasive methods for early IH prediction are needed. This study assessed whether sonographic measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) could improve the prediction of IH after stroke.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We prospectively measured the internal optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSDint) via transorbital ultrasound in 65 stroke patients and 30 controls. ONSD was also measured on the initial CT or MRI. The primary endpoint of IH was a composite of clinical and radiological signs of brain swelling. A predictive ONSD cut-off was determined from a multivariable logistic regression model, adjusted for age and infarct volume. Predictive performance was assessed using leave-one-out cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven of 65 stroke patients (11%) developed IH. The initial sonographic ONSDint was significantly increased in patients who developed IH. The multivariable model identified an optimal predictive cut-off of ⩾5.51 mm, which predicted IH with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 94.8%. In comparison, ONSD derived from initial neuroimaging was also a strong predictor, with an optimal cut-off of 6.80 mm yielding a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 91.1%, and showed superior predictive accuracy in the cross-validation (AUC 0.905 vs 0.687).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our sonographic ONSDint cut-off of ≥5.51 mm aligns well with recent stroke literature that used similar standardized measurement techniques. Our findings also highlight the distinct roles of different imaging modalities. While the initial CT/MRI provides a static measurement with high predictive power, the unique advantage of sonography is its bedside applicability, allowing for the crucial, non-invasive serial monitoring of ONSD as a dynamic marker of intracranial pressure changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early ONSD assessment is a valuable predictor of IH after severe stroke. A sonographic ONSDint of ⩾5.51 mm identifies patients at high risk with excellent accuracy. While initial neuroimaging may offer superior predictive power, bedside sonography remains a crucial, repeatable tool for monitoring these critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12866223/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Karl Georg Haeusler, Luciano A Sposato, Marek Grygier, Tatjana Potpara, Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk, Lucas V A Boersma, Gregory Y H Lip, Renate B Schnabel, Pavel Osmancik, Boris Schmidt, Wolfram Döhner, Jan Kovac, A John Camm
A significant proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who need thromboembolic protection are not treated with or discontinue oral anticoagulation after its initiation. Undertreatment in clinical practice has not improved sufficiently despite the availability of direct oral anticoagulants, which are associated with less intracranial bleeding than vitamin K antagonists. Multiple reasons account for this phenomenon, including bleeding events or ischemic strokes while on anticoagulation, poor treatment adherence despite best educational attempts, or aversion to drug therapy. Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure was introduced as an alternative to pharmacological therapy in AF patients in the early 2000s. Due to significant improvements in procedural safety over the years, left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), predominantly achieved through a percutaneous catheter-based device implantation approach, is increasingly favoured for preventing thromboembolic events in patients who cannot achieve effective anticoagulation or have a high hemorrhagic risk. This focused summary and update of a recently published practical guide, developed within guideline/guidance boundaries, provides a perspective of current evidence of potential indications, benefits, complications and limitations of LAAC for neurologists and stroke physicians who may consider this increasingly utilised therapy.
{"title":"Update on left atrial appendage closure for neurologists.","authors":"Karl Georg Haeusler, Luciano A Sposato, Marek Grygier, Tatjana Potpara, Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk, Lucas V A Boersma, Gregory Y H Lip, Renate B Schnabel, Pavel Osmancik, Boris Schmidt, Wolfram Döhner, Jan Kovac, A John Camm","doi":"10.1093/esj/aakaf018","DOIUrl":"10.1093/esj/aakaf018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A significant proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who need thromboembolic protection are not treated with or discontinue oral anticoagulation after its initiation. Undertreatment in clinical practice has not improved sufficiently despite the availability of direct oral anticoagulants, which are associated with less intracranial bleeding than vitamin K antagonists. Multiple reasons account for this phenomenon, including bleeding events or ischemic strokes while on anticoagulation, poor treatment adherence despite best educational attempts, or aversion to drug therapy. Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure was introduced as an alternative to pharmacological therapy in AF patients in the early 2000s. Due to significant improvements in procedural safety over the years, left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), predominantly achieved through a percutaneous catheter-based device implantation approach, is increasingly favoured for preventing thromboembolic events in patients who cannot achieve effective anticoagulation or have a high hemorrhagic risk. This focused summary and update of a recently published practical guide, developed within guideline/guidance boundaries, provides a perspective of current evidence of potential indications, benefits, complications and limitations of LAAC for neurologists and stroke physicians who may consider this increasingly utilised therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12866672/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/esj/23969873251360607
Jasmine Jost, Lukas Enz, Martina B Goeldlin, Philipp Baumgartner, Davide Strambo, Nabila Wali, Nicolas Martinez-Majander, Georg Kägi, Laura Vandelli, Christoph Riegler, Danna Krupka, Matteo Paolucci, Mauro Magoni, Giovanni Bianco, Hamza Jubran, Dejana R Jovanovic, Tomas Klail, Laura P Westphal, Alexander Salerno, Leon A Rinkel, Laura Mannismäki, Tolga Dittrich, Livio Picchetto, Regina von Rennenberg, Miguel Serôdio, Stefano Forlivesi, Dikran Mardighian, Carlo W Cereda, Ronen R Leker, Visnja Padjen, Mira Katan, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Urs Fischer, Tomas Dobrocky, Mirjam R Heldner, Patrik Michel, Paul J Nederkoorn, Sami Curtze, Gian Marco De Marchis, Guido Bigliardi, Christian H Nolte, João Pedro Marto, Andrea Zini, Alessandro Pezzini, Susanne Wegener, Marcel Arnold, Stefan T Engelter, Henrik Gensicke
Introduction: Data on safety of endovascular therapy (EVT) in the very elderly are scarce. Using data from a large prospective EVT registry, we aimed at providing better evidence for EVT decision-making in patients aged 90 years and older.
Patients and methods: In this multicentre observational study from the EVA-TRISP collaboration outcomes were compared between patients aged ⩾90 years with those aged <90 years using multivariate logistic regression analysis and reporting odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Outcomes were occurrence of poor functional outcome in survivors (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3-5 if pre-stroke mRS 0-2 and mRS higher than pre-stroke mRS if pre-stroke mRS 3-5), mortality at 3 months after stroke, unsuccessful recanalization (mTICI 0-2a) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH, defined by ECASS-II-/III-criteria).
Results: Of 13,306 eligible patients, 892 were ⩾90 years old (6.7%). The very elderly had a higher median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on admission (16 vs 14) and were more likely to have a pre-stroke mRS of 3-5 (38.0% vs 8.7%). The odds of poor functional outcome (ORadjusted 2.35 (95%-CI 1.87-2.97); 61.6% vs 38.7%), death (ORadjusted 3.04 (95%-CI 2.60-3.55); 53.9% vs 21.3%) and unsuccessful recanalization (ORadjusted 1.34 (95%-CI 1.14-1.57); 32.4% vs 27.2%) were higher in patients aged ⩾90 years. The odds of sICH did not differ (ORadjusted 0.92 (95%-CI 0.66-1.28); 5.1% vs 5.0%).
Discussion and conclusion: EVT-treated stroke patients ⩾90 years had higher odds of poor functional outcome, mortality and unsuccessful recanalization than younger patients. However, the probability of sICH after EVT was not increased. The decision in favor of or against EVT in the very elderly should not be based on age alone.
导读:关于血管内治疗(EVT)在老年人中的安全性的数据很少。使用来自大型前瞻性EVT登记的数据,我们旨在为90岁及以上患者的EVT决策提供更好的证据。患者和方法:在这项来自EVA-TRISP合作的多中心观察性研究中,将年龄大于或等于90岁的患者与年龄大于或等于90岁的患者进行了比较。结果:在13306名符合条件的患者中,892名年龄大于或等于90岁(6.7%)。高龄患者入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)中位数较高(16比14),卒中前mRS更可能为3-5(38.0%比8.7%)。功能不良预后的几率(or调整后为2.35 (95% ci 1.87-2.97);61.6% vs 38.7%)、死亡(or校正3.04 (95% ci 2.60-3.55);53.9% vs 21.3%)和再通失败(ORadjusted 1.34 (95% ci 1.14-1.57);32.4% vs 27.2%)在年龄大于或等于90岁的患者中更高。siich的几率没有差异(or校正0.92 (95%-CI 0.66-1.28);5.1% vs 5.0%)。讨论和结论:evt治疗的卒中患者与年轻患者相比,小于90年的患者具有较差的功能结果,死亡率和不成功的再通的几率更高。然而,EVT后sICH发生的概率并没有增加。在高龄患者中支持或反对EVT的决定不应仅仅基于年龄。
{"title":"Safety of endovascular therapy in ischemic stroke patients ⩾90 years: A cohort study from the EVA-TRISP collaboration.","authors":"Jasmine Jost, Lukas Enz, Martina B Goeldlin, Philipp Baumgartner, Davide Strambo, Nabila Wali, Nicolas Martinez-Majander, Georg Kägi, Laura Vandelli, Christoph Riegler, Danna Krupka, Matteo Paolucci, Mauro Magoni, Giovanni Bianco, Hamza Jubran, Dejana R Jovanovic, Tomas Klail, Laura P Westphal, Alexander Salerno, Leon A Rinkel, Laura Mannismäki, Tolga Dittrich, Livio Picchetto, Regina von Rennenberg, Miguel Serôdio, Stefano Forlivesi, Dikran Mardighian, Carlo W Cereda, Ronen R Leker, Visnja Padjen, Mira Katan, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Urs Fischer, Tomas Dobrocky, Mirjam R Heldner, Patrik Michel, Paul J Nederkoorn, Sami Curtze, Gian Marco De Marchis, Guido Bigliardi, Christian H Nolte, João Pedro Marto, Andrea Zini, Alessandro Pezzini, Susanne Wegener, Marcel Arnold, Stefan T Engelter, Henrik Gensicke","doi":"10.1093/esj/23969873251360607","DOIUrl":"10.1093/esj/23969873251360607","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Data on safety of endovascular therapy (EVT) in the very elderly are scarce. Using data from a large prospective EVT registry, we aimed at providing better evidence for EVT decision-making in patients aged 90 years and older.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this multicentre observational study from the EVA-TRISP collaboration outcomes were compared between patients aged ⩾90 years with those aged <90 years using multivariate logistic regression analysis and reporting odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Outcomes were occurrence of poor functional outcome in survivors (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3-5 if pre-stroke mRS 0-2 and mRS higher than pre-stroke mRS if pre-stroke mRS 3-5), mortality at 3 months after stroke, unsuccessful recanalization (mTICI 0-2a) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH, defined by ECASS-II-/III-criteria).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 13,306 eligible patients, 892 were ⩾90 years old (6.7%). The very elderly had a higher median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on admission (16 vs 14) and were more likely to have a pre-stroke mRS of 3-5 (38.0% vs 8.7%). The odds of poor functional outcome (ORadjusted 2.35 (95%-CI 1.87-2.97); 61.6% vs 38.7%), death (ORadjusted 3.04 (95%-CI 2.60-3.55); 53.9% vs 21.3%) and unsuccessful recanalization (ORadjusted 1.34 (95%-CI 1.14-1.57); 32.4% vs 27.2%) were higher in patients aged ⩾90 years. The odds of sICH did not differ (ORadjusted 0.92 (95%-CI 0.66-1.28); 5.1% vs 5.0%).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>EVT-treated stroke patients ⩾90 years had higher odds of poor functional outcome, mortality and unsuccessful recanalization than younger patients. However, the probability of sICH after EVT was not increased. The decision in favor of or against EVT in the very elderly should not be based on age alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12866211/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chiel F P Beemsterboer, Shan Sui Nio, Berto J Bouma, S Matthijs Boekholdt, Ludo F M Beenen, Henk A Marquering, Charles B L M Majoie, Adrienne van Randen, R Nils Planken, Leon A Rinkel, Jonathan M Coutinho
Introduction: Cardiac CT is increasingly used to screen for cardioembolism in stroke patients. We assessed the frequency and management of non-cardiac incidental findings on prospective ECG-gated cardiac CT in patients with a suspected stroke.
Patients and methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of the Mind the Heart study, a prospective single-centre cohort study including consecutive adult patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), transient ischaemic attack (TIA), or a stroke mimic who underwent cardiac CT as part of an acute stroke imaging protocol. Endpoints were pre-defined non-cardiac incidental findings that were detected on cardiac CT: pulmonary embolism (PE), potential malignant lesions, pulmonary consolidations or ground-glass densities, bone fractures, lymphadenopathy, focal liver lesions, and ascending aortic or pulmonary artery dilatation. Change of management was defined as additional treatment or follow-up.
Results: We included 654 patients (57% men, median age 71 [IQR 59-80] years) of whom 451 (69%) had AIS, 48 had TIA (7%), and 155 had a stroke mimic (24%). Overall, 58 non-cardiac incidental findings were found in 55 (8%; 95%CI, 6-11) patients. The most frequent incidental findings were consolidations or ground-glass densities (n = 17, 3%), liver cysts or non-specific hypodensities (n = 14, 2%), pulmonary nodules or masses (n = 9, 1%), and PEs (n = 8, 1%). Incidental findings led to a change of management in 17/55 (31%) patients of whom 13/55 (24%) had additional follow-up and 9/55 (16%) received treatment (anticoagulation n = 8, chemotherapy n = 1).
Discussion & conclusion: Non-cardiac incidental findings were observed on cardiac CT in 8% of patients with a suspected stroke. These findings changed management in 31% of these patients.
{"title":"Frequency and management of non-cardiac incidental findings on cardiac CT in patients with a suspected stroke.","authors":"Chiel F P Beemsterboer, Shan Sui Nio, Berto J Bouma, S Matthijs Boekholdt, Ludo F M Beenen, Henk A Marquering, Charles B L M Majoie, Adrienne van Randen, R Nils Planken, Leon A Rinkel, Jonathan M Coutinho","doi":"10.1093/esj/aakaf027","DOIUrl":"10.1093/esj/aakaf027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cardiac CT is increasingly used to screen for cardioembolism in stroke patients. We assessed the frequency and management of non-cardiac incidental findings on prospective ECG-gated cardiac CT in patients with a suspected stroke.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a post-hoc analysis of the Mind the Heart study, a prospective single-centre cohort study including consecutive adult patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), transient ischaemic attack (TIA), or a stroke mimic who underwent cardiac CT as part of an acute stroke imaging protocol. Endpoints were pre-defined non-cardiac incidental findings that were detected on cardiac CT: pulmonary embolism (PE), potential malignant lesions, pulmonary consolidations or ground-glass densities, bone fractures, lymphadenopathy, focal liver lesions, and ascending aortic or pulmonary artery dilatation. Change of management was defined as additional treatment or follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 654 patients (57% men, median age 71 [IQR 59-80] years) of whom 451 (69%) had AIS, 48 had TIA (7%), and 155 had a stroke mimic (24%). Overall, 58 non-cardiac incidental findings were found in 55 (8%; 95%CI, 6-11) patients. The most frequent incidental findings were consolidations or ground-glass densities (n = 17, 3%), liver cysts or non-specific hypodensities (n = 14, 2%), pulmonary nodules or masses (n = 9, 1%), and PEs (n = 8, 1%). Incidental findings led to a change of management in 17/55 (31%) patients of whom 13/55 (24%) had additional follow-up and 9/55 (16%) received treatment (anticoagulation n = 8, chemotherapy n = 1).</p><p><strong>Discussion & conclusion: </strong>Non-cardiac incidental findings were observed on cardiac CT in 8% of patients with a suspected stroke. These findings changed management in 31% of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12866668/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/esj/23969873251350882
Frederik J Reitsma, Sander M J van Kuijk, David J Werring, Gargi Banerjee, Charlotte Cordonnier, Olfa Kaaouana, Laurent Puy, Anand Viswanathan, Robert J van Oostenbrugge, Julie Staals, Rob P W Rouhl
Introduction: Predicting the occurrence of late seizures after intracerebral haemorrhage may help in making clinical decisions about treatment. Currently, the CAVE score is the best performing risk score. We aimed to design a different, pragmatic risk prediction score and compared it to the CAVE score.
Patients and methods: The South Limburg (Netherlands) intracerebral haemorrhage registry, consisting of patients with a primary intracerebral haemorrhage in 2004-2009, was used for the derivation cohort. We made a prediction model using Cox proportional hazard analyses; comparisons between models were made with the c-statistic. We validated our model externally in three independent cohorts.
Results: Our derivation cohort consisted of 781 patients, of whom 78 (10%) developed late seizures. We found the following independent predictors for late seizures: any neurosurgical procedure, age < 65 years, lobar haemorrhage, and early seizures (occurring within the first week). These formed our new prediction score (LEAN score), which had an optimism-corrected c-statistic of 0.80 (95%-confidence interval 0.78-0.86). The LEAN score predicts late seizure risk as 0.7%, 1.6%, 8.8%, 22.0%, 29.8%, 43.5%, 100% for the increasing score groups respectively. External validation showed comparable optimism-corrected c-statistics for both the LEAN score and the CAVE score.
Conclusion: The newly developed LEAN score consists of easily available clinical variables and performs equally to the CAVE score. Additionally, the high risk of late seizures in patients with the maximum LEAN score might make a diagnosis of epilepsy possible according to international guidelines despite these patients only had early seizures.
{"title":"Development and external validation of the LEAN score to predict late seizures after intracerebral haemorrhage.","authors":"Frederik J Reitsma, Sander M J van Kuijk, David J Werring, Gargi Banerjee, Charlotte Cordonnier, Olfa Kaaouana, Laurent Puy, Anand Viswanathan, Robert J van Oostenbrugge, Julie Staals, Rob P W Rouhl","doi":"10.1093/esj/23969873251350882","DOIUrl":"10.1093/esj/23969873251350882","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Predicting the occurrence of late seizures after intracerebral haemorrhage may help in making clinical decisions about treatment. Currently, the CAVE score is the best performing risk score. We aimed to design a different, pragmatic risk prediction score and compared it to the CAVE score.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The South Limburg (Netherlands) intracerebral haemorrhage registry, consisting of patients with a primary intracerebral haemorrhage in 2004-2009, was used for the derivation cohort. We made a prediction model using Cox proportional hazard analyses; comparisons between models were made with the c-statistic. We validated our model externally in three independent cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our derivation cohort consisted of 781 patients, of whom 78 (10%) developed late seizures. We found the following independent predictors for late seizures: any neurosurgical procedure, age < 65 years, lobar haemorrhage, and early seizures (occurring within the first week). These formed our new prediction score (LEAN score), which had an optimism-corrected c-statistic of 0.80 (95%-confidence interval 0.78-0.86). The LEAN score predicts late seizure risk as 0.7%, 1.6%, 8.8%, 22.0%, 29.8%, 43.5%, 100% for the increasing score groups respectively. External validation showed comparable optimism-corrected c-statistics for both the LEAN score and the CAVE score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The newly developed LEAN score consists of easily available clinical variables and performs equally to the CAVE score. Additionally, the high risk of late seizures in patients with the maximum LEAN score might make a diagnosis of epilepsy possible according to international guidelines despite these patients only had early seizures.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12866225/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/esj/23969873251355938
Chloe A Mutimer, Sameer Sharma, Henry Zhao, Atte Meretoja, Leonid Churilov, Teddy Y Wu, Timothy J Kleinig, Philip M Choi, Andrew Cheung, Jiann-Shing Jeng, Henry Ma, Duy Ton Mai, Huy-Thang Nguyen, Gagan Sharma, Bruce C V Campbell, Geoffrey A Donnan, Stephen M Davis, Nawaf Yassi
Introduction: The predictive value of CT markers of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) expansion is time-dependent, but data in the ultra-early period (<2 h from onset) are limited. We aimed to describe the frequency of these CT markers, their association with haematoma volume, haematoma expansion (HE) and functional outcome at 90-days. We also investigated the effect of tranexamic acid on HE in the presence of these markers.
Patients and methods: We performed a pooled analysis of individual patient data from the STOP-AUST and STOP-MSU placebo-controlled randomised trials of tranexamic acid, including ICH patients scanned within 2 h of symptom onset. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between CT markers and HE or 90-days functional outcomes (poor outcome defined as mRS3-6).
Results: Among 246 patients, the swirl sign (74.3%) was the most frequent CT marker and the blend sign least frequent (7.3%). All markers were associated with increased baseline haematoma volume, and excluding the black hole sign, all were more common in patients with 24-h HE. The blend and spot signs were associated with 24-h HE and heterogenous density, swirl sign, hypodensity and island sign were associated with poor 90-day function outcomes in univariate logistic regression. However, the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve was similar for all markers and indicated low discriminative ability (Chi-squared test p = 0.81). A potential benefit of tranexamic acid in HE reduction was observed in patients with the spot sign (interaction p = 0.01).
Conclusions: The discriminative utility of CT markers of HE in the early timeframe appears insufficient. There may be an effect of tranexamic acid in spot sign positive patients <2 h from onset.
{"title":"Ultra-early computed tomography markers of haematoma expansion: Potential trial targets?","authors":"Chloe A Mutimer, Sameer Sharma, Henry Zhao, Atte Meretoja, Leonid Churilov, Teddy Y Wu, Timothy J Kleinig, Philip M Choi, Andrew Cheung, Jiann-Shing Jeng, Henry Ma, Duy Ton Mai, Huy-Thang Nguyen, Gagan Sharma, Bruce C V Campbell, Geoffrey A Donnan, Stephen M Davis, Nawaf Yassi","doi":"10.1093/esj/23969873251355938","DOIUrl":"10.1093/esj/23969873251355938","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The predictive value of CT markers of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) expansion is time-dependent, but data in the ultra-early period (<2 h from onset) are limited. We aimed to describe the frequency of these CT markers, their association with haematoma volume, haematoma expansion (HE) and functional outcome at 90-days. We also investigated the effect of tranexamic acid on HE in the presence of these markers.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed a pooled analysis of individual patient data from the STOP-AUST and STOP-MSU placebo-controlled randomised trials of tranexamic acid, including ICH patients scanned within 2 h of symptom onset. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between CT markers and HE or 90-days functional outcomes (poor outcome defined as mRS3-6).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 246 patients, the swirl sign (74.3%) was the most frequent CT marker and the blend sign least frequent (7.3%). All markers were associated with increased baseline haematoma volume, and excluding the black hole sign, all were more common in patients with 24-h HE. The blend and spot signs were associated with 24-h HE and heterogenous density, swirl sign, hypodensity and island sign were associated with poor 90-day function outcomes in univariate logistic regression. However, the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve was similar for all markers and indicated low discriminative ability (Chi-squared test p = 0.81). A potential benefit of tranexamic acid in HE reduction was observed in patients with the spot sign (interaction p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The discriminative utility of CT markers of HE in the early timeframe appears insufficient. There may be an effect of tranexamic acid in spot sign positive patients <2 h from onset.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12866209/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/esj/23969873251368726
Iyas Daghlas
{"title":"Limitations to causal inference in observational studies of PFO closure.","authors":"Iyas Daghlas","doi":"10.1093/esj/23969873251368726","DOIUrl":"10.1093/esj/23969873251368726","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12866205/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nuala Peter, Hannah Johns, Bruce C V Campbell, Bijoy Menon, Mark W Parsons, Leonid Churilov
Introduction: Non-inferiority trials in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are crucial to improve access to high-quality care. Population shifts must be accounted for when estimating non-inferiority margins, eg, changes in population characteristics (trial vs historical data); however, existing methods have practical and statistical limitations. We propose a pragmatic conceptual approach and fully pre-specifiable procedure for calibrating non-inferiority margins that account for population shifts in observed trial populations.
Patients and methods: Our approach splits trial and historical data into subgroups based on relevant effect-modifying covariates. Trial data from TASTE, which investigated the effect (mRS score 0-1 at day 90) of tenecteplase vs alteplase, were compared to historical data from the Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists' Collaboration (STTC) meta-analysis (alteplase vs control). We reweighted the STTC treatment effect to match the shifted AIS population in TASTE before deriving the calibrated non-inferiority margin.
Results: For both datasets, subgroups were based on onset-to-treatment time and baseline NIHSS values. The reweighted risk difference for alteplase vs control was 11.70% (95% CI, 6.67-16.73); the conservative treatment-effect estimate was 6.67%, corresponding to a risk difference of 3.33% (50% reduction). Hence, the calibrated margin for comparing alternative interventions to alteplase was set at -3.33%, consistent with the European Stroke Organisation's clinically recommended margin (-3.0%).
Conclusion: Our conceptual approach to estimate calibrated non-inferiority margins is a simple and pragmatic alternative to existing methods to account for population shifts in stroke trials. The supporting procedure has already been applied.
{"title":"Calibrated non-inferiority margin: a new pragmatic method to account for population shift in stroke trials.","authors":"Nuala Peter, Hannah Johns, Bruce C V Campbell, Bijoy Menon, Mark W Parsons, Leonid Churilov","doi":"10.1093/esj/aakaf022","DOIUrl":"10.1093/esj/aakaf022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-inferiority trials in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are crucial to improve access to high-quality care. Population shifts must be accounted for when estimating non-inferiority margins, eg, changes in population characteristics (trial vs historical data); however, existing methods have practical and statistical limitations. We propose a pragmatic conceptual approach and fully pre-specifiable procedure for calibrating non-inferiority margins that account for population shifts in observed trial populations.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Our approach splits trial and historical data into subgroups based on relevant effect-modifying covariates. Trial data from TASTE, which investigated the effect (mRS score 0-1 at day 90) of tenecteplase vs alteplase, were compared to historical data from the Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists' Collaboration (STTC) meta-analysis (alteplase vs control). We reweighted the STTC treatment effect to match the shifted AIS population in TASTE before deriving the calibrated non-inferiority margin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both datasets, subgroups were based on onset-to-treatment time and baseline NIHSS values. The reweighted risk difference for alteplase vs control was 11.70% (95% CI, 6.67-16.73); the conservative treatment-effect estimate was 6.67%, corresponding to a risk difference of 3.33% (50% reduction). Hence, the calibrated margin for comparing alternative interventions to alteplase was set at -3.33%, consistent with the European Stroke Organisation's clinically recommended margin (-3.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our conceptual approach to estimate calibrated non-inferiority margins is a simple and pragmatic alternative to existing methods to account for population shifts in stroke trials. The supporting procedure has already been applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12866653/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}