首页 > 最新文献

Assessing Writing最新文献

英文 中文
Challenges and opportunities of automated essay scoring for low-proficient L2 English writers 对低熟练程度的第二语言英语作家的自动作文评分的挑战和机遇
IF 5.5 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-09-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2025.100982
Vanessa De Wilde , Orphée De Clercq
Assessing students’ writing can be a challenging activity. To make writing assessment more feasible, researchers have investigated the possibilities of automated essay scoring (AES). Most studies investigating AES have focused on L1 writing or intermediate to advanced L2 writing. In this study we explored the possibilities of using AES with low proficiency L2 English writers. We used a dataset which comprised writing samples from 3166 young L2 English learners who were at the very start of L2 English instruction. All tasks received a score assigned by humans.
For automated scoring we experimented with two machine learning methods. First, a feature-based approach for which the dataset was linguistically preprocessed using natural language processing tools. The second approach employed deep learning by fine-tuning various large language models. Because we were particularly interested in the influence of spelling errors, we also created a corrected, spell-checked version of our dataset.
Models trained on the uncorrected samples yield the best results. Especially the deep learning approach leads to a satisfying performance with a quadratic weighted kappa above .70. The model which was fine-tuned on an underlying Dutch large language model was superior, which might be linked to the low L2 English proficiency of the young L1 Dutch writers in our sample.
评估学生的写作是一项具有挑战性的活动。为了使写作评估更加可行,研究人员研究了自动论文评分(AES)的可能性。大多数调查AES的研究都集中在第一语言写作或中级到高级第二语言写作上。在本研究中,我们探讨了对低熟练程度的二语作者使用AES的可能性。我们使用了一个数据集,其中包括来自3166名年轻的第二语言英语学习者的写作样本,他们都是在第二语言英语教学的开始。所有的任务都会收到一个由人类分配的分数。对于自动评分,我们尝试了两种机器学习方法。首先,基于特征的方法,使用自然语言处理工具对数据集进行语言预处理。第二种方法采用深度学习,对各种大型语言模型进行微调。因为我们对拼写错误的影响特别感兴趣,所以我们还创建了一个经过拼写检查的更正版本的数据集。在未校正的样本上训练的模型产生最好的结果。尤其是深度学习方法,其二次加权kappa值在0.70以上,取得了令人满意的效果。在潜在的荷兰语大语言模型上进行微调的模型更优越,这可能与我们样本中年轻的母语荷兰语作家的第二语言英语熟练程度较低有关。
{"title":"Challenges and opportunities of automated essay scoring for low-proficient L2 English writers","authors":"Vanessa De Wilde ,&nbsp;Orphée De Clercq","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100982","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100982","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Assessing students’ writing can be a challenging activity. To make writing assessment more feasible, researchers have investigated the possibilities of automated essay scoring (AES). Most studies investigating AES have focused on L1 writing or intermediate to advanced L2 writing. In this study we explored the possibilities of using AES with low proficiency L2 English writers. We used a dataset which comprised writing samples from 3166 young L2 English learners who were at the very start of L2 English instruction. All tasks received a score assigned by humans.</div><div>For automated scoring we experimented with two machine learning methods. First, a feature-based approach for which the dataset was linguistically preprocessed using natural language processing tools. The second approach employed deep learning by fine-tuning various large language models. Because we were particularly interested in the influence of spelling errors, we also created a corrected, spell-checked version of our dataset.</div><div>Models trained on the uncorrected samples yield the best results. Especially the deep learning approach leads to a satisfying performance with a quadratic weighted kappa above .70. The model which was fine-tuned on an underlying Dutch large language model was superior, which might be linked to the low L2 English proficiency of the young L1 Dutch writers in our sample.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 100982"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145105005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can generative AI figure out figurative language? The influence of idioms on essay scoring by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Deepseek 生成式人工智能能理解比喻语言吗?习语对ChatGPT、Gemini和Deepseek作文评分的影响
IF 5.5 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-09-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2025.100981
Enis Oğuz
The developments in Generative AI technologies have paved the way for numerous innovations in different fields. Recently, Generative AI has been proposed as a competitor to AES systems in evaluating student essays. Considering the potential limitations of AI in processing idioms, this study assessed the scoring performances of Generative AI models for essays with and without idioms by incorporating insights from Corpus Linguistics and Computational Linguistics. Two equal essay lists were created from 348 student essays taken from a corpus: one with multiple idioms present in each essay and another with no idioms. Three Generative AI models (ChatGPT, Gemini, and Deepseek) were asked to score all essays in both lists three times, using the same rubric used by human raters. The results revealed excellent consistency for all models without any detectable bias for any demographic group, but Gemini outperformed its competitors in interrater reliability with human raters. For essays with idioms, Gemini followed the most similar pattern to human raters. While models in the study demonstrated capability for a hybrid approach in formative assessments, Gemini was the best candidate due to its ability to handle figurative language and its potential for handling essay-scoring tasks in high-stakes exams in the future.
生成式人工智能技术的发展为不同领域的众多创新铺平了道路。最近,生成人工智能被提议作为AES系统在评估学生论文方面的竞争对手。考虑到人工智能在处理成语方面的潜在局限性,本研究通过结合语料库语言学和计算语言学的见解,评估了生成式人工智能模型在有成语和没有成语的文章中的评分表现。从一个语料库中提取的348篇学生论文创建了两个相等的论文列表:一篇文章中有多个习语,另一篇没有习语。三个生成式人工智能模型(ChatGPT、Gemini和Deepseek)被要求对两个列表中的所有文章进行三次评分,使用与人类评分者相同的评分标准。结果显示,所有模型都具有出色的一致性,对任何人口统计群体都没有任何可检测到的偏差,但Gemini在与人类评分者的相互可靠性方面优于其竞争对手。对于带有习语的作文,双子座的评分模式与人类最相似。虽然研究中的模型显示了在形成性评估中采用混合方法的能力,但双子座是最佳人选,因为它有能力处理比喻性语言,并且有潜力在未来的高风险考试中处理论文评分任务。
{"title":"Can generative AI figure out figurative language? The influence of idioms on essay scoring by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Deepseek","authors":"Enis Oğuz","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100981","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100981","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The developments in Generative AI technologies have paved the way for numerous innovations in different fields. Recently, Generative AI has been proposed as a competitor to AES systems in evaluating student essays. Considering the potential limitations of AI in processing idioms, this study assessed the scoring performances of Generative AI models for essays with and without idioms by incorporating insights from Corpus Linguistics and Computational Linguistics. Two equal essay lists were created from 348 student essays taken from a corpus: one with multiple idioms present in each essay and another with no idioms. Three Generative AI models (ChatGPT, Gemini, and Deepseek) were asked to score all essays in both lists three times, using the same rubric used by human raters. The results revealed excellent consistency for all models without any detectable bias for any demographic group, but Gemini outperformed its competitors in interrater reliability with human raters. For essays with idioms, Gemini followed the most similar pattern to human raters. While models in the study demonstrated capability for a hybrid approach in formative assessments, Gemini was the best candidate due to its ability to handle figurative language and its potential for handling essay-scoring tasks in high-stakes exams in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 100981"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145004300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Growth mindset and writing engagement: The roles of motivation regulation and engagement with teacher’s written corrective feedback 成长心态与写作投入:动机调节与参与对教师书面纠正反馈的作用
IF 5.5 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-08-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2025.100980
Mahdieh Darvari , S. Yahya Hejazi , Majid Sadoughi
Although engagement is widely recognized as a key and desirable outcome in Foreign/Second Language (L2) education and has garnered increasing research attention, its skill-specific manifestation, particularly in areas such as writing, remains underexplored. To address this gap, this study is among the first attempts to examine L2 writing engagement and its three potential predictors. To this end, motivated by Dweck’s (2017) mindsets theory and Lou and Noels’ (2019) language mindset meaning system, the present study investigated the link between growth L2 writing mindset, i.e., beliefs about improvability and changeability of L2 writing skills and abilities, and engagement by taking into account the parallel mediating roles of learners’ motivation regulation and engagement with teacher’s written corrective feedback (WCF). A total of 343 Iranian learners at intermediate proficiency level were selected through convenience sampling and responded to questionnaires. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) analyses indicated that growth writing mindset could positively predict engagement, and this link was mediated by learners’ motivation regulation and engagement with teacher’s WCF. Implications and suggestions for fostering growth mindset and promoting learners’ feedback engagement as well as motivation regulation are presented.
尽管参与被广泛认为是外语/第二语言(L2)教育的一个关键和理想的结果,并且已经引起了越来越多的研究关注,但其特定技能的表现,特别是在写作等领域,仍未得到充分探索。为了解决这一差距,本研究是第一次尝试检查二语写作投入及其三个潜在的预测因素。为此,本研究在Dweck(2017)的思维模式理论和Lou and Noels(2019)的语言思维模式意义系统的激励下,考虑到学习者动机调节和参与教师书面纠正反馈(WCF)的平行中介作用,研究了增长型二语写作心态(即对二语写作技能和能力的可改进性和可变性的信念)与参与之间的联系。采用方便抽样的方法,选取343名中级熟练程度的伊朗学习者进行问卷调查。结构方程模型(SEM)分析表明,成长型写作思维对教师写作投入有正向预测作用,学习者的动机调节和教师写作投入在二者之间起中介作用。提出了培养成长型思维、促进学习者反馈参与和动机调节的启示和建议。
{"title":"Growth mindset and writing engagement: The roles of motivation regulation and engagement with teacher’s written corrective feedback","authors":"Mahdieh Darvari ,&nbsp;S. Yahya Hejazi ,&nbsp;Majid Sadoughi","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100980","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100980","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although engagement is widely recognized as a key and desirable outcome in Foreign/Second Language (L2) education and has garnered increasing research attention, its skill-specific manifestation, particularly in areas such as writing, remains underexplored. To address this gap, this study is among the first attempts to examine L2 writing engagement and its three potential predictors. To this end, motivated by Dweck’s (2017) mindsets theory and Lou and Noels’ (2019) language mindset meaning system, the present study investigated the link between growth L2 writing mindset, i.e., beliefs about improvability and changeability of L2 writing skills and abilities, and engagement by taking into account the parallel mediating roles of learners’ motivation regulation and engagement with teacher’s written corrective feedback (WCF). A total of 343 Iranian learners at intermediate proficiency level were selected through convenience sampling and responded to questionnaires. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) analyses indicated that growth writing mindset could positively predict engagement, and this link was mediated by learners’ motivation regulation and engagement with teacher’s WCF. Implications and suggestions for fostering growth mindset and promoting learners’ feedback engagement as well as motivation regulation are presented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 100980"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144867216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring the cross-lingual influence of linguistic complexity in second language writing assessment 探讨语言复杂性对第二语言写作评价的跨语言影响
IF 5.5 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-08-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2025.100951
Sara Geremia , Thomas Gaillat , Nicolas Ballier , Andrew J. Simpkin
This paper explores the influence of L1 on the linguistic complexity of English learners. It relies on features extracted from texts and modelled using a statistical learning framework. Linguistic complexity is assessed automatically in terms of proficiency levels across different L1. We investigate whether proficiency grading by humans matches clusters of learner writings based on the similarity of linguistic features. We then use complexity metrics to automatically assess proficiency levels in samples of writings of different L1s. We focus on variable importance to understand which features best discriminate between levels. Analytic clusters of linguistic complexity data do not map well to learning levels, which promises poorly for the relevance of using language complexity metrics for level prediction. However, assessing L1 influence on linguistic complexity through a multinomial logistic regression with elastic net regularisation shows significant results. The models predict the proficiency levels of students of different L1s.
本文探讨了母语对英语学习者语言复杂性的影响。它依赖于从文本中提取的特征,并使用统计学习框架建模。语言复杂性是根据不同语言的熟练程度自动评估的。我们根据语言特征的相似性来研究人类的熟练程度评分是否与学习者的写作相匹配。然后,我们使用复杂性度量来自动评估不同l15写作样本的熟练程度。我们关注变量重要性,以了解哪些特征最能区分不同级别。语言复杂性数据的分析聚类不能很好地映射到学习水平,这对于使用语言复杂性指标进行水平预测的相关性很差。然而,通过弹性网络正则化的多项逻辑回归评估L1对语言复杂性的影响显示出显著的结果。模型预测了不同年级学生的熟练程度。
{"title":"Exploring the cross-lingual influence of linguistic complexity in second language writing assessment","authors":"Sara Geremia ,&nbsp;Thomas Gaillat ,&nbsp;Nicolas Ballier ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Simpkin","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100951","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100951","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the influence of L1 on the linguistic complexity of English learners. It relies on features extracted from texts and modelled using a statistical learning framework. Linguistic complexity is assessed automatically in terms of proficiency levels across different L1. We investigate whether proficiency grading by humans matches clusters of learner writings based on the similarity of linguistic features. We then use complexity metrics to automatically assess proficiency levels in samples of writings of different L1s. We focus on variable importance to understand which features best discriminate between levels. Analytic clusters of linguistic complexity data do not map well to learning levels, which promises poorly for the relevance of using language complexity metrics for level prediction. However, assessing L1 influence on linguistic complexity through a multinomial logistic regression with elastic net regularisation shows significant results. The models predict the proficiency levels of students of different L1s.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 100951"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144851982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response time for English learners on large-scale writing assessments 英语学习者在大规模写作评估中的反应时间
IF 5.5 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-08-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2025.100979
Catherine Welch, Stephen Dunbar, Jeongmin Ji, Annette Vernon, Junhee Park
The focus of this study is on the relationship between response time and performance for students completing an evidence-based writing assessment as part of a state’s accountability plan. Within an untimed testing administration, this study examined the difference in performance between English Learners and Non-English Learners across four different writing traits. The differences observed lead to recommendations for assessment administration and the appropriate allocation of testing time and teaching strategies for taking the assessment.
作为州问责制计划的一部分,本研究的重点是学生完成循证写作评估的反应时间与表现之间的关系。在一项不定时的测试管理中,这项研究调查了英语学习者和非英语学习者在四种不同写作特征上的表现差异。观察到的差异导致了评估管理和适当分配测试时间和采取评估的教学策略的建议。
{"title":"Response time for English learners on large-scale writing assessments","authors":"Catherine Welch,&nbsp;Stephen Dunbar,&nbsp;Jeongmin Ji,&nbsp;Annette Vernon,&nbsp;Junhee Park","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100979","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100979","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The focus of this study is on the relationship between response time and performance for students completing an evidence-based writing assessment as part of a state’s accountability plan. Within an untimed testing administration, this study examined the difference in performance between English Learners and Non-English Learners across four different writing traits. The differences observed lead to recommendations for assessment administration and the appropriate allocation of testing time and teaching strategies for taking the assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 100979"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144831002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding the critical thinking experiences of L2 student writers engaged in linguistically supported peer feedback giving 了解第二语言学生作家在语言支持的同伴反馈中的批判性思维体验
IF 5.5 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-08-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2025.100977
Xiaodong Zhang
Research has examined second-language (L2) student writers’ peer feedback giving (PFG) and the impact that PFG has on students’ critical thinking, namely their critical engagement with writing content. However, the use of PFG to support students’ critical thinking has often been limited by approaches that treat critical thinking as a purely cognitive process, making critical thinking inaccessible as a practice for students. To address this gap, this qualitative study, conducted in a writing course at a Chinese university, explores L2 student writers’ critical thinking processes during PFG, which was supported by systemic functional linguistics (SFL). The study aims to show whether and how SFL-supported PFG could provide a linguistically accessible gateway through which student writers can practice critical thinking in the context of L2 writing. This exploration is justified by existing research on the potential of PFG in supporting student writers’ critical thinking and research on SFL in transparently highlighting language resources (lexicon and grammar) in constructing and deconstructing the content of discourse. Data sources included interviews with students, a written record of the students’ PFG, and their written reflections on PFG. Qualitative analyses reveal that with the support of SFL knowledge, student evaluators gradually developed the ability to understand language resources as an accessible gateway to unpacking the meaning making of writing content. The knowledge enabled them to practice critical thinking by analyzing and evaluating the subtleties of meaning making in their peers’ writing during feedback sessions, and connecting gains from PFG to their own writing. However, it was noted that practicing critical thinking in this process was sensitive to student-internal and student-external factors in the process of PFG (e.g., insufficient knowledge of SFL, teacher support). This study concluded that overall, engaging in SFL supported by PFG provided student evaluators with an accessible channel for practicing and developing critical thinking in the context of L2 writing.
研究调查了第二语言(L2)学生作家的同伴反馈(PFG)以及PFG对学生批判性思维的影响,即他们对写作内容的批判性参与。然而,使用PFG来支持学生的批判性思维往往受到将批判性思维视为纯粹认知过程的方法的限制,使得批判性思维无法作为学生的实践。为了解决这一差距,本研究在中国一所大学的写作课程中进行了定性研究,探讨了系统功能语言学(SFL)支持的第二语言学生作家在PFG期间的批判性思维过程。本研究旨在表明sfl支持的PFG是否以及如何提供一个语言上可访问的门户,通过该门户,学生作家可以在二语写作的背景下练习批判性思维。现有研究表明,PFG在支持学生作家批判性思维方面的潜力,以及外语在构建和解构语篇内容时透明地突出语言资源(词汇和语法)的研究,都证明了这一探索的合理性。数据来源包括对学生的采访,学生PFG的书面记录,以及他们对PFG的书面反思。定性分析表明,在外语知识的支持下,学生评价者逐渐发展了理解语言资源的能力,这是解开写作内容意义构成的一个可访问的门户。这些知识使他们能够通过在反馈会议上分析和评估同龄人写作中意义构建的微妙之处来练习批判性思维,并将从PFG中获得的收获与自己的写作联系起来。然而,我们注意到,在这个过程中练习批判性思维对PFG过程中的学生内部和学生外部因素(例如,外语知识不足,教师支持)很敏感。本研究得出的结论是,总体而言,在PFG的支持下,参与SFL为学生评估者提供了一个在二语写作背景下练习和发展批判性思维的渠道。
{"title":"Understanding the critical thinking experiences of L2 student writers engaged in linguistically supported peer feedback giving","authors":"Xiaodong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100977","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100977","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research has examined second-language (L2) student writers’ peer feedback giving (PFG) and the impact that PFG has on students’ critical thinking, namely their critical engagement with writing content. However, the use of PFG to support students’ critical thinking has often been limited by approaches that treat critical thinking as a purely cognitive process, making critical thinking inaccessible as a practice for students. To address this gap, this qualitative study, conducted in a writing course at a Chinese university, explores L2 student writers’ critical thinking processes during PFG, which was supported by systemic functional linguistics (SFL). The study aims to show whether and how SFL-supported PFG could provide a linguistically accessible gateway through which student writers can practice critical thinking in the context of L2 writing. This exploration is justified by existing research on the potential of PFG in supporting student writers’ critical thinking and research on SFL in transparently highlighting language resources (lexicon and grammar) in constructing and deconstructing the content of discourse. Data sources included interviews with students, a written record of the students’ PFG, and their written reflections on PFG. Qualitative analyses reveal that with the support of SFL knowledge, student evaluators gradually developed the ability to understand language resources as an accessible gateway to unpacking the meaning making of writing content. The knowledge enabled them to practice critical thinking by analyzing and evaluating the subtleties of meaning making in their peers’ writing during feedback sessions, and connecting gains from PFG to their own writing. However, it was noted that practicing critical thinking in this process was sensitive to student-internal and student-external factors in the process of PFG (e.g., insufficient knowledge of SFL, teacher support). This study concluded that overall, engaging in SFL supported by PFG provided student evaluators with an accessible channel for practicing and developing critical thinking in the context of L2 writing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 100977"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144826361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lexical richness in young English learners’ writing: A focus on opinion and listen-write task types 青年英语学习者写作中的词汇丰富性:对观点和听写任务类型的关注
IF 5.5 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2025.100975
Hakyung Sung , Mikyung Kim Wolf , Michael Suhan , Kristopher Kyle
Ample research has examined the linguistic characteristics of second language (L2) writing across proficiency scores, with a focus on lexical diversity, sophistication, and density as key dimensions of lexical richness. However, the applicability of these indices to young L2 learners’ writings, often characterized by limited vocabulary and constrained output in standardized writing tasks, remained underexplored. To address this gap, this study analyzed the lexical richness of young L2 learners’ written productions from two TOEFL Junior Writing tasks (Opinion and Listen-Write tasks), using 37 tailored indices of lexical diversity, sophistication, and density. The results indicated that the lexical characteristics of young L2 learners vary by task score and task type, particularly when assessed through indices such as lexical diversity (e.g., moving-average type-token ratio) and sophistication (e.g., n-gram strength of association). Nonetheless, incorporating additional measures, such as syntactic complexity or discourse features, may be essential for distinguishing young L2 learners at higher proficiency levels.
大量研究考察了第二语言写作的语言特征,并将词汇多样性、复杂性和密度作为词汇丰富性的关键维度。然而,这些指标在年轻的二语学习者的写作中的适用性仍未得到充分的探讨,这些写作通常以词汇量有限和标准化写作任务中输出受限为特征。为了解决这一差距,本研究使用37个定制的词汇多样性、复杂性和密度指标,分析了年轻二语学习者在两个托福初级写作任务(Opinion和Listen-Write任务)中书面作品的词汇丰富性。结果表明,年轻二语学习者的词汇特征因任务得分和任务类型而异,特别是通过词汇多样性(如移动平均类型-表征比)和复杂程度(如n-gram联想强度)等指标进行评估时。尽管如此,结合其他措施,如句法复杂性或话语特征,对于区分高熟练程度的年轻二语学习者可能是必不可少的。
{"title":"Lexical richness in young English learners’ writing: A focus on opinion and listen-write task types","authors":"Hakyung Sung ,&nbsp;Mikyung Kim Wolf ,&nbsp;Michael Suhan ,&nbsp;Kristopher Kyle","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100975","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100975","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ample research has examined the linguistic characteristics of second language (L2) writing across proficiency scores, with a focus on lexical diversity, sophistication, and density as key dimensions of lexical richness. However, the applicability of these indices to young L2 learners’ writings, often characterized by limited vocabulary and constrained output in standardized writing tasks, remained underexplored. To address this gap, this study analyzed the lexical richness of young L2 learners’ written productions from two TOEFL Junior Writing tasks (Opinion and Listen-Write tasks), using 37 tailored indices of lexical diversity, sophistication, and density. The results indicated that the lexical characteristics of young L2 learners vary by task score and task type, particularly when assessed through indices such as lexical diversity (e.g., moving-average type-token ratio) and sophistication (e.g., n-gram strength of association). Nonetheless, incorporating additional measures, such as syntactic complexity or discourse features, may be essential for distinguishing young L2 learners at higher proficiency levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 100975"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144781790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of task repetition schedules and emotions on L2 writing performance profiles using latent transition analysis 任务重复时间表和情绪对二语写作表现的影响
IF 5.5 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-07-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2025.100974
Mahmoud Abdi Tabari , Hansol Lee
This study employed Latent Transition Analysis (LTA) to identify distinct L2 writing performance profiles based on CALF measures (Syntactic Complexity, Accuracy, Lexical Complexity, and Fluency) and to examine the influence of emotional states under varying task repetition schedules. Participants included 270 ESL undergraduates in a U.S. university writing course, and they were randomly assigned to long-spaced, short-spaced, or massed repetition schedules. Each completed a persuasive writing task, followed by a questionnaire measuring anxiety and enjoyment. Results indicated that learners initially displayed similar performance levels but ultimately formed two profiles: Lower Performance and Higher Performance. Those in the long-spaced group were more likely to belong to the Higher Performance Profile, characterized by higher CALF measures, particularly in syntactic complexity, accuracy, and lexical complexity. Among the predictors—three types of task repetition schedules (long-spaced, short-spaced, and massed repetitions) and two task-related emotions (enjoyment and anxiety)—perceived enjoyment emerged as the strongest predictor of being classified into the Higher Performance Profile. These findings emphasize the importance of utilizing a person-centered approach to explore individual differences in L2 writing trajectories and suggest that carefully designed task repetition schedules and attention to emotional states can enhance writing performance.
本研究采用潜在转换分析(LTA)来识别基于CALF测量(句法复杂性、准确性、词汇复杂性和流畅性)的不同二语写作表现特征,并检查不同任务重复计划下情绪状态的影响。参与者包括270名参加美国大学写作课程的ESL本科生,他们被随机分配到长间隔、短间隔和大量重复计划中。每个人都完成了一项有说服力的写作任务,然后是一份测量焦虑和快乐程度的问卷。结果表明,学习者最初表现出相似的表现水平,但最终形成了两种表现:低表现和高表现。长间隔组的人更有可能属于更高的表现,其特征是更高的CALF测量,特别是在句法复杂性、准确性和词汇复杂性方面。在三种类型的任务重复计划(长间隔、短间隔和大量重复)和两种与任务相关的情绪(享受和焦虑)的预测因子中,感知到的享受是被分类为高绩效Profile的最强预测因子。这些发现强调了利用以人为本的方法来探索二语写作轨迹的个体差异的重要性,并表明精心设计的任务重复时间表和对情绪状态的关注可以提高写作表现。
{"title":"Impact of task repetition schedules and emotions on L2 writing performance profiles using latent transition analysis","authors":"Mahmoud Abdi Tabari ,&nbsp;Hansol Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100974","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100974","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study employed Latent Transition Analysis (LTA) to identify distinct L2 writing performance profiles based on CALF measures (Syntactic Complexity, Accuracy, Lexical Complexity, and Fluency) and to examine the influence of emotional states under varying task repetition schedules. Participants included 270 ESL undergraduates in a U.S. university writing course, and they were randomly assigned to long-spaced, short-spaced, or massed repetition schedules. Each completed a persuasive writing task, followed by a questionnaire measuring anxiety and enjoyment. Results indicated that learners initially displayed similar performance levels but ultimately formed two profiles: Lower Performance and Higher Performance. Those in the long-spaced group were more likely to belong to the Higher Performance Profile, characterized by higher CALF measures, particularly in syntactic complexity, accuracy, and lexical complexity. Among the predictors—three types of task repetition schedules (long-spaced, short-spaced, and massed repetitions) and two task-related emotions (enjoyment and anxiety)—perceived enjoyment emerged as the strongest predictor of being classified into the Higher Performance Profile. These findings emphasize the importance of utilizing a person-centered approach to explore individual differences in L2 writing trajectories and suggest that carefully designed task repetition schedules and attention to emotional states can enhance writing performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 100974"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144724442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing L2 writing formality using syntactic complexity indices: A fuzzy evaluation approach 用句法复杂性指标评价二语写作的正式性:一种模糊评价方法
IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-07-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2025.100973
Zhiyun Huang , Guangyao Chen , Zhanhao Jiang
Addressing the ambiguity in formality standards, this study introduces a cutting-edge Multi-dimensional Connection Cloud Model (MCCM) that leverages syntactic complexity indices to develop a fuzzy assessment model for formality in L2 writing. Employing Elastic Net Regression (ENR), the results revealed that four large-grained indices (mean length of sentence, mean length of T-unit, complex nominals per T-unit and complex nominals per clause), and one fine-grained index (average number of dependents per direct object) were significant in predicting the level of formality in L2 writing. To evaluate the model’s predictive power, 45 essays were used as a validation set. The MCCM model achieved a prediction accuracy of 91.1 % (41 out of 45 cases) in matching human ratings, with connection degrees effectively capturing classification uncertainty and boundary transitions. This pioneering framework effectively navigates the complexities and variable distributions of indicators, offering a more objective solution compared to conventional expert evaluations and introducing a novel methodological approach to assessing formality in academic writing.
针对正式性标准的模糊性,本研究引入了一种前沿的多维连接云模型(mcm),该模型利用句法复杂性指数建立了二语写作正式性的模糊评估模型。采用弹性网络回归(Elastic Net Regression, ENR)分析发现,四个大粒度指标(句子平均长度、t -单位平均长度、每个t -单位复合语料和每个子句复合语料)和一个细粒度指标(每个直接宾语的平均依赖数)在预测二语写作的正式程度方面具有显著意义。为了评估模型的预测能力,45篇论文被用作验证集。MCCM模型在匹配人类评分方面的预测精度为91.1 %(45例中的41例),连接度有效地捕获了分类不确定性和边界转移。这个开创性的框架有效地驾驭了指标的复杂性和可变分布,与传统的专家评估相比,提供了一个更客观的解决方案,并引入了一种新的方法来评估学术写作的正式性。
{"title":"Assessing L2 writing formality using syntactic complexity indices: A fuzzy evaluation approach","authors":"Zhiyun Huang ,&nbsp;Guangyao Chen ,&nbsp;Zhanhao Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100973","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100973","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Addressing the ambiguity in formality standards, this study introduces a cutting-edge Multi-dimensional Connection Cloud Model (MCCM) that leverages syntactic complexity indices to develop a fuzzy assessment model for formality in L2 writing. Employing Elastic Net Regression (ENR), the results revealed that four large-grained indices (mean length of sentence, mean length of T-unit, complex nominals per T-unit and complex nominals per clause), and one fine-grained index (average number of dependents per direct object) were significant in predicting the level of formality in L2 writing. To evaluate the model’s predictive power, 45 essays were used as a validation set. The MCCM model achieved a prediction accuracy of 91.1 % (41 out of 45 cases) in matching human ratings, with connection degrees effectively capturing classification uncertainty and boundary transitions. This pioneering framework effectively navigates the complexities and variable distributions of indicators, offering a more objective solution compared to conventional expert evaluations and introducing a novel methodological approach to assessing formality in academic writing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 100973"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144604347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial Volume 65 编辑第65卷
IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2025.100963
Martin East, David Slomp
{"title":"Editorial Volume 65","authors":"Martin East,&nbsp;David Slomp","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100963","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100963","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 100963"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144522308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Assessing Writing
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1