Review of Philosophy and Psychology最新文献

英文中文

Schizophrenic Thought Insertion and Self-Experience 精神分裂症的思想插入与自我体验

IF 2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-023-00680-2

Darryl Mathieson

引用次数: 0

The Phenomenal Quality of Complex Experiences 复杂体验的现象性

IF 2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Pub Date : 2023-02-02 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-023-00676-y

P. Fazekas

引用次数: 0

Assessing the Evidence for Outcome Bias and Hindsight Bias 评估结果偏倚和后见偏倚的证据

IF 2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-023-00672-2

Mikkel Gerken

引用次数: 1

Inner Speech and ‘Pure’ Thought – Do we Think in Language? 内心言语与“纯粹”思维——我们用语言思考吗？

IF 2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-023-00678-w

N. Kompa

引用次数: 4

Justice before Expediency: Robust Intuitive Concern for Rights Protection in Criminalization Decisions 权宜之计之前的正义:刑事判决中对权利保护的强烈直觉关注

IF 2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Pub Date : 2023-01-28 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-023-00674-0

Piotr Bystranowski, I. Hannikainen

引用次数: 0

The Epistemic Innocence of Elaborated Delusions Re-Examined 重新审视复杂妄想的认识论清白

IF 2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Pub Date : 2023-01-26 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-023-00675-z

Maja Białek

引用次数: 0

Two Kinds of Process or Two Kinds of Processing? Disambiguating Dual-Process Theories 两种加工还是两种加工?消除双过程理论的歧义

IF 2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Pub Date : 2023-01-17 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-023-00673-1

Rafael Augusto

引用次数: 1

Does Cognitive Psychology Imply Pluralism About the Self? 认知心理学是否意味着关于自我的多元主义？

IF 2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Pub Date : 2023-01-04 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-022-00671-9

Chris Register

引用次数: 0

Students Eat Less Meat After Studying Meat Ethics. 学习肉类伦理后，学生少吃肉。

IF 2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-021-00583-0

Eric Schwitzgebel, Bradford Cokelet, Peter Singer

In the first controlled, non-self-report studies to show an influence of university-level ethical instruction on everyday behavior, Schwitzgebel et al. (2020) and Jalil et al. (2020) found that students purchase less meat after exposure to material on the ethics of eating meat. We sought to extend and conceptually replicate this research. Seven hundred thirty students in three large philosophy classes read James Rachels' (2004) "Basic Argument for Vegetarianism", followed by 50-min small-group discussions. Half also viewed a vegetarianism advocacy video containing factory farm footage. A few days after instruction, 54% of students agreed that "eating the meat of factory farmed animals is unethical", compared to 37% before instruction, with no difference between the film and non-film conditions. Also, 39% of students anonymously pledged to avoid eating factory farmed meat for 24 h, again with no statistically detectable difference between conditions. Finally, we obtained 2828 campus food purchase receipts for 113 of the enrolled students who used their Student ID cards for purchases on campus, which we compared with 5033 purchases from a group of 226 students who did not receive the instruction. Meat purchases remained constant in the comparison group and declined among the students exposed to the material, falling from 30% to 23% of purchases overall and from 51% to 42% of purchases of $4.99 or more, with the effect possibly larger in the film condition.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13164-021-00583-0.

Schwitzgebel et al.(2020)和Jalil et al.(2020)在第一个显示大学道德教育对日常行为影响的受控非自我报告研究中发现，学生在接触了有关吃肉道德的材料后，购买的肉类减少了。我们试图扩展并在概念上复制这项研究。730名学生在三个大的哲学课上读了詹姆斯·雷切尔斯的书(2004)“素食主义的基本论点”，之后是50分钟的小组讨论。一半的人还观看了包含工厂化农场镜头的素食主义宣传视频。授课几天后，54%的学生同意“吃工厂化养殖动物的肉是不道德的”，而在授课前，这一比例为37%，在拍摄电影和非拍摄电影的情况下没有区别。此外，39%的学生匿名承诺在24小时内不吃工厂养殖的肉类，同样没有统计上的差异。最后，我们获得了113名使用学生证在校园里购物的学生的2828张校园食品购买收据，与此相比，226名没有收到指示的学生的5033张校园食品购买收据。在对照组中，肉类的购买量保持不变，但在接触材料的学生中购买量有所下降，从30%下降到23%，从51%下降到42%，购买4.99美元或以上的商品，在看电影的情况下，影响可能更大。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料，下载地址:10.1007/s13164-021-00583-0。

{"title":"Students Eat Less Meat After Studying Meat Ethics.","authors":"Eric Schwitzgebel, Bradford Cokelet, Peter Singer","doi":"10.1007/s13164-021-00583-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00583-0","url":null,"abstract":"In the first controlled, non-self-report studies to show an influence of university-level ethical instruction on everyday behavior, Schwitzgebel et al. (2020) and Jalil et al. (2020) found that students purchase less meat after exposure to material on the ethics of eating meat. We sought to extend and conceptually replicate this research. Seven hundred thirty students in three large philosophy classes read James Rachels' (2004) \"Basic Argument for Vegetarianism\", followed by 50-min small-group discussions. Half also viewed a vegetarianism advocacy video containing factory farm footage. A few days after instruction, 54% of students agreed that \"eating the meat of factory farmed animals is unethical\", compared to 37% before instruction, with no difference between the film and non-film conditions. Also, 39% of students anonymously pledged to avoid eating factory farmed meat for 24 h, again with no statistically detectable difference between conditions. Finally, we obtained 2828 campus food purchase receipts for 113 of the enrolled students who used their Student ID cards for purchases on campus, which we compared with 5033 purchases from a group of 226 students who did not receive the instruction. Meat purchases remained constant in the comparison group and declined among the students exposed to the material, falling from 30% to 23% of purchases overall and from 51% to 42% of purchases of $4.99 or more, with the effect possibly larger in the film condition.Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13164-021-00583-0.","PeriodicalId":47055,"journal":{"name":"Review of Philosophy and Psychology","volume":"14 1","pages":"113-138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571006/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9159653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

What's inside is all that counts? The contours of everyday thinking about self-control. 里面的东西才是最重要的?每天思考自我控制的轮廓。

IF 2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-021-00573-2

Juan Pablo Bermúdez, Samuel Murray, Louis Chartrand, Sergio Barbosa

Does self-control require willpower? The question cuts to the heart of a debate about whether self-control is identical with some psychological process internal to the agents or not. Noticeably absent from these debates is systematic evidence about the folk-psychological category of self-control. Here, we present the results of two behavioral studies (N = 296) that indicate the structure of everyday use of the concept. In Study 1, participants rated the degree to which different strategies to respond to motivational conflict exemplify self-control. Participants distinguished between intra-psychic and externally-scaffolded strategies and judged that the former exemplified self-control more than the latter. In Study 2, participants provided various solutions to manage motivational conflict and rated their proposals on effectiveness. Participants produced substantially more intra-psychic strategies, rated them as more effective, and advised them at a higher rate than externally-scaffolded strategies. Taken together, these results suggest that while people recognize a plurality of strategies as genuine instances of self-control, purely internal exercises of self-control are considered more prototypical than their externally-scaffolded counterparts. This implies a hierarchical structure for the folk psychological category of self-control. The concept encompasses a variety of regulatory strategies and organizes these strategies along a hierarchical continuum, with purely intra-psychic strategies at the center and scaffolded strategies in the periphery.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13164-021-00573-2.

自我控制需要意志力吗?这个问题直指一个争论的核心，即自我控制是否等同于行为主体内部的某种心理过程。值得注意的是，这些争论中缺少关于自我控制的民间心理学范畴的系统证据。在这里，我们提出了两项行为研究(N = 296)的结果，这些研究表明了该概念的日常使用结构。在研究1中，参与者评估了不同的应对动机冲突的策略在多大程度上体现了自我控制。参与者区分了内在心理和外在框架策略，并判断前者比后者更能体现自我控制。在研究2中，参与者提供了各种管理动机冲突的解决方案，并对他们的建议的有效性进行了评分。参与者产生了更多的内在心理策略，认为它们更有效，并以比外部支架策略更高的比率提出建议。综上所述，这些结果表明，虽然人们认识到多种策略是真正的自我控制实例，但纯粹的内部自我控制练习被认为比外部框架的自我控制练习更典型。这意味着民间心理范畴的自我控制存在层次结构。这个概念包含了各种各样的调节策略，并沿着一个层次连续体组织这些策略，纯心理内策略在中心，支架策略在外围。补充资料:在线版本提供补充资料，网址为10.1007/s13164-021-00573-2。

{"title":"What's inside is all that counts? The contours of everyday thinking about self-control.","authors":"Juan Pablo Bermúdez, Samuel Murray, Louis Chartrand, Sergio Barbosa","doi":"10.1007/s13164-021-00573-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00573-2","url":null,"abstract":"Does self-control require willpower? The question cuts to the heart of a debate about whether self-control is identical with some psychological process internal to the agents or not. Noticeably absent from these debates is systematic evidence about the folk-psychological category of self-control. Here, we present the results of two behavioral studies (N = 296) that indicate the structure of everyday use of the concept. In Study 1, participants rated the degree to which different strategies to respond to motivational conflict exemplify self-control. Participants distinguished between intra-psychic and externally-scaffolded strategies and judged that the former exemplified self-control more than the latter. In Study 2, participants provided various solutions to manage motivational conflict and rated their proposals on effectiveness. Participants produced substantially more intra-psychic strategies, rated them as more effective, and advised them at a higher rate than externally-scaffolded strategies. Taken together, these results suggest that while people recognize a plurality of strategies as genuine instances of self-control, purely internal exercises of self-control are considered more prototypical than their externally-scaffolded counterparts. This implies a hierarchical structure for the folk psychological category of self-control. The concept encompasses a variety of regulatory strategies and organizes these strategies along a hierarchical continuum, with purely intra-psychic strategies at the center and scaffolded strategies in the periphery.Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13164-021-00573-2.","PeriodicalId":47055,"journal":{"name":"Review of Philosophy and Psychology","volume":"14 1","pages":"33-55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033625/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9244417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀