Pub Date : 2023-05-18DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2023.2214090
Pascal D. König
{"title":"“Data, data, data” – post-Brexit data governance and its relation to the UK’s economic model","authors":"Pascal D. König","doi":"10.1080/01442872.2023.2214090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.2214090","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47179,"journal":{"name":"Policy Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81778044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-16DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088
L. Filimon, M. Ivănescu
{"title":"Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020","authors":"L. Filimon, M. Ivănescu","doi":"10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47179,"journal":{"name":"Policy Studies","volume":"111 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76126728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-16DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2023.2202905
Weijie Luo
{"title":"Demography and the composition of taxes: a political economy theory","authors":"Weijie Luo","doi":"10.1080/01442872.2023.2202905","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.2202905","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47179,"journal":{"name":"Policy Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73107170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-26DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2023.2194055
Neta Sher‐Hadar
{"title":"How do you do, implementation? A Latour-inspired critical approach to implementation","authors":"Neta Sher‐Hadar","doi":"10.1080/01442872.2023.2194055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.2194055","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47179,"journal":{"name":"Policy Studies","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84762840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-24DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2023.2203479
Fabio G. Lupato, Ariel Jerez, Marco Meloni
{"title":"Digital innovation in electoral campaigns: the case of microcredit in Podemos","authors":"Fabio G. Lupato, Ariel Jerez, Marco Meloni","doi":"10.1080/01442872.2023.2203479","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.2203479","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47179,"journal":{"name":"Policy Studies","volume":"105 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86485468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-24DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2023.2193387
N. Hossain, A. Joshi, Suchi Pande
Institutionalized complaint systems are notable features of improving public programmes and government practice. This article reviews literature on formal grievance redress mechanisms in the global South to understand whether these mechanisms help the aggrieved to complain and seek redress for their grievances. In this emerging literature, the institutional and de fi nitional boundaries of formal grievance mechanisms are slippery; systems that look like grievance systems may do little to enable complaints by those who seek to register them, and even less to enable them to achieve redress; with limited evidence on how these formal grievance systems work on the ground, and without su ffi cient power to act on complaints these formal grievance systems appear to be more ornamental; and where they have worked uncommonly well they have not always attracted political support to go to scale. The article concludes with a discussion of avenues for research identi fi ed through this literature review.
{"title":"The politics of complaint: a review of the literature on grievance redress mechanisms in the global south","authors":"N. Hossain, A. Joshi, Suchi Pande","doi":"10.1080/01442872.2023.2193387","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.2193387","url":null,"abstract":"Institutionalized complaint systems are notable features of improving public programmes and government practice. This article reviews literature on formal grievance redress mechanisms in the global South to understand whether these mechanisms help the aggrieved to complain and seek redress for their grievances. In this emerging literature, the institutional and de fi nitional boundaries of formal grievance mechanisms are slippery; systems that look like grievance systems may do little to enable complaints by those who seek to register them, and even less to enable them to achieve redress; with limited evidence on how these formal grievance systems work on the ground, and without su ffi cient power to act on complaints these formal grievance systems appear to be more ornamental; and where they have worked uncommonly well they have not always attracted political support to go to scale. The article concludes with a discussion of avenues for research identi fi ed through this literature review.","PeriodicalId":47179,"journal":{"name":"Policy Studies","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75468417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-18DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2023.2202385
Daniel Casey
{"title":"Punctuated equilibrium and the dynamics of political participation: the case of letter writing","authors":"Daniel Casey","doi":"10.1080/01442872.2023.2202385","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.2202385","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47179,"journal":{"name":"Policy Studies","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83958220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-10DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2023.2186385
Paul Tobin, Nafhesa Ali, S. MacGregor, Zarin Ahmad
ABSTRACT “Climate intermediaries” are “go-betweens”, operating between levels of governance and/or between different types of actors. Faith-based actors (FBAs) are one populous yet neglected type of potential climate intermediary. In the UK, Muslims are the second largest group of religious adherents, yet are “othered”, and face widespread Islamophobia, alongside multiple other intersecting inequalities. Drawing from 21 interviews, we analyse data from individuals self-identifying as Muslim and their experiences of intermediation with state and non-state actors, to understand how such roles manifest. We find that Muslim FBAs are invisibilized and/or instrumentalized as climate intermediaries when engaging with state actors and “mainstream” ENGOs, but can assume such roles effectively when liaising with others from the shared faith or acting in interfaith contexts. The outcome of this obstructed action is a lack of representative or transformative strategies for climate action within “mainstream” fora, leading to subjective fatigue, poor policy design, and Muslim communities instead electing to intermediate through interfaith channels and between other Muslims. Through this article, we seek to redress the invisibilization of Muslim climate intermediaries, and raise critical questions about how climate intermediaries are understood, both within the policy literature, and in policy-making circles.
{"title":"“The religions are engaging: tick, well done”: the invisibilization and instrumentalization of Muslim climate intermediaries","authors":"Paul Tobin, Nafhesa Ali, S. MacGregor, Zarin Ahmad","doi":"10.1080/01442872.2023.2186385","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.2186385","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT “Climate intermediaries” are “go-betweens”, operating between levels of governance and/or between different types of actors. Faith-based actors (FBAs) are one populous yet neglected type of potential climate intermediary. In the UK, Muslims are the second largest group of religious adherents, yet are “othered”, and face widespread Islamophobia, alongside multiple other intersecting inequalities. Drawing from 21 interviews, we analyse data from individuals self-identifying as Muslim and their experiences of intermediation with state and non-state actors, to understand how such roles manifest. We find that Muslim FBAs are invisibilized and/or instrumentalized as climate intermediaries when engaging with state actors and “mainstream” ENGOs, but can assume such roles effectively when liaising with others from the shared faith or acting in interfaith contexts. The outcome of this obstructed action is a lack of representative or transformative strategies for climate action within “mainstream” fora, leading to subjective fatigue, poor policy design, and Muslim communities instead electing to intermediate through interfaith channels and between other Muslims. Through this article, we seek to redress the invisibilization of Muslim climate intermediaries, and raise critical questions about how climate intermediaries are understood, both within the policy literature, and in policy-making circles.","PeriodicalId":47179,"journal":{"name":"Policy Studies","volume":"49 1","pages":"627 - 645"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75424003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：