首页 > 最新文献

Dyslexia最新文献

英文 中文
Technical adequacy of measuring teachers' knowledge of dyslexia 测量教师对阅读障碍的了解在技术上是否充分。
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1765
Deborah K. Reed, Huibin Zhang

Given the rapid growth in educational policies targeting educators' knowledge of dyslexia, this study explored the technical adequacy of a common instrument for measuring that knowledge. The responses of 1141 preservice teachers were scored in three ways: polytomously with the original 4-point Likert scale, dichotomously as true-false, and dichotomously as though the options were multiple choice. An exploratory factor analysis suggested at least one-third of the items needed to be removed. Confirmatory factor analyses suggested a one-factor model with polytomous scoring had the best fit to the data, but only six items loaded. All models demonstrated unacceptable internal consistency reliability (<0.70). Because no technically adequate version of the measure was identified, questions remain about basing policy on scores from these instruments. However, the findings indicated ways this type of measure might be improved.

鉴于针对教育工作者诵读困难知识的教育政策发展迅速,本研究探讨了测量诵读困难知识的通用工具在技术上是否适当。1141 名职前教师的回答以三种方式进行评分:原始的 4 点李克特量表的二分法、真-假的二分法以及选项为多项选择的二分法。探索性因素分析表明,至少有三分之一的项目需要删除。确认性因素分析表明,采用多项式计分的单因素模型与数据的拟合度最高,但只有六个项目有载荷。所有模型都显示出不可接受的内部一致性可靠性 (
{"title":"Technical adequacy of measuring teachers' knowledge of dyslexia","authors":"Deborah K. Reed,&nbsp;Huibin Zhang","doi":"10.1002/dys.1765","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1765","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Given the rapid growth in educational policies targeting educators' knowledge of dyslexia, this study explored the technical adequacy of a common instrument for measuring that knowledge. The responses of 1141 preservice teachers were scored in three ways: polytomously with the original 4-point Likert scale, dichotomously as true-false, and dichotomously as though the options were multiple choice. An exploratory factor analysis suggested at least one-third of the items needed to be removed. Confirmatory factor analyses suggested a one-factor model with polytomous scoring had the best fit to the data, but only six items loaded. All models demonstrated unacceptable internal consistency reliability (&lt;0.70). Because no technically adequate version of the measure was identified, questions remain about basing policy on scores from these instruments. However, the findings indicated ways this type of measure might be improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140144287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Computerized Executive Functions Training: The efficacy on reading performance of children with dyslexia 计算机化执行功能训练:对阅读障碍儿童阅读能力的影响。
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1762
Sajjad Basharpoor, Elham Seif, Somayeh Daneshvar

This study aimed to test the efficacy of a newly developed computer-based game naming computerized executive functions (CEF) task on the reading ability of children suffering from dyslexia. Forty dyslexic school students from the fourth and fifth grades were randomized to one of the experimental and control groups. Subjects of the experimental group received 12 sessions of Computerized Executive Functions Training (CEFT), while subjects of the control group played a neutral computer game throughout the 12 sessions. All participants responded to the Reading and Dyslexia Test (NEMA) as the pre- and post-test measure. Results revealed a significant improvement in the reading ability of subjects of the experimental group compared to the control group. Subjects of the experimental group indicated a greater improvement in some components of the NEMA scale including word reading, word chains reading, picture naming, text comprehension, word comprehension and letter fluency relative to the control group. CEFT had no significant effect in modifying the category fluency, phoneme elimination and rhyming components of the NEMA scale. Applying CEFT improves the reading performance of children with dyslexia by enforcing their cognitive abilities like working memory, inhibition control and cognitive flexibility which are necessary for normal reading ability.

本研究旨在测试新开发的电脑游戏 "命名电脑执行功能(CEF)任务 "对阅读障碍儿童阅读能力的影响。40名患有阅读障碍的四、五年级学生被随机分为实验组和对照组。实验组的受试者接受了 12 次计算机化执行功能训练(CEFT),而对照组的受试者则在 12 次训练中始终玩一款中立的计算机游戏。所有受试者都参加了阅读和读写障碍测试(NEMA),作为测试前和测试后的衡量标准。结果显示,与对照组相比,实验组受试者的阅读能力明显提高。与对照组相比,实验组受试者在 NEMA 量表的某些部分(包括单词阅读、单词链阅读、图片命名、文字理解、单词理解和字母流利度)有了更大的提高。CEFT对NEMA量表中的类别流利性、音素消除和押韵部分没有明显改善效果。应用 CEFT 可增强阅读障碍儿童的认知能力,如正常阅读能力所需的工作记忆、抑制控制和认知灵活性,从而提高他们的阅读能力。
{"title":"Computerized Executive Functions Training: The efficacy on reading performance of children with dyslexia","authors":"Sajjad Basharpoor,&nbsp;Elham Seif,&nbsp;Somayeh Daneshvar","doi":"10.1002/dys.1762","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1762","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to test the efficacy of a newly developed computer-based game naming computerized executive functions (CEF) task on the reading ability of children suffering from dyslexia. Forty dyslexic school students from the fourth and fifth grades were randomized to one of the experimental and control groups. Subjects of the experimental group received 12 sessions of Computerized Executive Functions Training (CEFT), while subjects of the control group played a neutral computer game throughout the 12 sessions. All participants responded to the Reading and Dyslexia Test (NEMA) as the pre- and post-test measure. Results revealed a significant improvement in the reading ability of subjects of the experimental group compared to the control group. Subjects of the experimental group indicated a greater improvement in some components of the NEMA scale including word reading, word chains reading, picture naming, text comprehension, word comprehension and letter fluency relative to the control group. CEFT had no significant effect in modifying the category fluency, phoneme elimination and rhyming components of the NEMA scale. Applying CEFT improves the reading performance of children with dyslexia by enforcing their cognitive abilities like working memory, inhibition control and cognitive flexibility which are necessary for normal reading ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140040610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of the multiple-deficit hypothesis among dyslexic Arabic-speaking children 评估阿拉伯语阅读障碍儿童的多重缺陷假说。
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-03-03 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1759
Salim Abu Rabia, Esraa Darawshe

This study examined the multiple-deficit hypothesis among Arabic-speaking elementary school students. A total of 90 students, divided into three main groups based on their performance on an Arabic word-reading task: dyslexic (n = 30), regular age-matched (n = 30), and 3rd-grade regular students, who were matched to the dyslexic group in regard to their reading proficiency level (n = 30). Participants underwent a nine-domain Arabic reading experiment that measured accuracy and fluency to evaluate general reading proficiency. The performance of Arabic dyslexic students was significantly worse than age-matched controls, but similar to young matched controls based on the reading level of each cognitive task. Moreover, dyslexic students showed deficits in three or more cognitive functions, depending on severity. This study adds to the limited empirical research on the double-deficit hypothesis and its extension to the multiple-domain model among young Arabic students.

本研究探讨了阿拉伯语小学生的多重缺陷假说。共有 90 名学生,根据他们在阿拉伯语单词阅读任务中的表现分为三大组:阅读障碍组(30 人)、与年龄相匹配的普通组(30 人)以及与阅读障碍组阅读能力水平相匹配的三年级普通组(30 人)。参加者进行了九个领域的阿拉伯语阅读实验,测量准确性和流畅性,以评估一般阅读能力。根据每项认知任务的阅读水平,阿拉伯语阅读障碍学生的成绩明显低于年龄匹配的对照组,但与年轻匹配的对照组相近。此外,根据严重程度,阅读障碍学生在三种或三种以上的认知功能上存在缺陷。本研究为阿拉伯语青少年学生双重缺陷假说及其延伸到多领域模型的有限实证研究增添了新的内容。
{"title":"Evaluation of the multiple-deficit hypothesis among dyslexic Arabic-speaking children","authors":"Salim Abu Rabia,&nbsp;Esraa Darawshe","doi":"10.1002/dys.1759","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1759","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examined the multiple-deficit hypothesis among Arabic-speaking elementary school students. A total of 90 students, divided into three main groups based on their performance on an Arabic word-reading task: dyslexic (<i>n</i> = 30), regular age-matched (<i>n</i> = 30), and 3rd-grade regular students, who were matched to the dyslexic group in regard to their reading proficiency level (<i>n</i> = 30). Participants underwent a nine-domain Arabic reading experiment that measured accuracy and fluency to evaluate general reading proficiency. The performance of Arabic dyslexic students was significantly worse than age-matched controls, but similar to young matched controls based on the reading level of each cognitive task. Moreover, dyslexic students showed deficits in three or more cognitive functions, depending on severity. This study adds to the limited empirical research on the double-deficit hypothesis and its extension to the multiple-domain model among young Arabic students.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140022966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reading problems and their connection with visual search and attention 阅读问题及其与视觉搜索和注意力的联系
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1764
Heida Maria Sigurdardottir, Hilma Ros Omarsdottir, Anna Sigridur Valgeirsdottir

Attention has been hypothesized to act as a sequential gating mechanism for the orderly processing of letters and words. These same visuoattentional processes are often assumed to partake in some but not all types of visual search. In the current study, 24 dyslexic and 36 typical readers completed an attentionally demanding visual conjunction search. Visual feature search served as an internal control. It has been suggested that reading problems should go hand in hand with specific problems in visual conjunction search—particularly elevated conjunction search slopes (time per search item)—often interpreted as a problem with visual attention. Results showed that reading problems were associated with slower visual search, especially conjunction search. However, reading deficits were not associated with increased conjunction search slopes but instead with increased search intercepts, traditionally not interpreted as reflecting attention. We discuss these results in the context of hypothesized visuoattentional problems in dyslexia. Remaining open to multiple interpretations of the data, the current study demonstrates that difficulties in visual search are associated with reading problems, in accordance with growing literature on visual cognition problems in developmental dyslexia.

注意力被假设为一种有序处理字母和单词的顺序门控机制。这些相同的视觉注意过程通常被认为参与了某些类型的视觉搜索,而非所有类型的视觉搜索。在本研究中,24 名阅读障碍者和 36 名典型阅读者完成了一项需要集中注意力的视觉连线搜索。视觉特征搜索作为内部对照。有人认为,阅读问题应该与视觉连线搜索中的特定问题同时存在,特别是连线搜索斜率(每个搜索项目的时间)的升高,这通常被解释为视觉注意力的问题。结果显示,阅读问题与视觉搜索(尤其是连词搜索)速度减慢有关。然而,阅读障碍与连词搜索斜率增加无关,而是与搜索截距增加有关,这在传统上并不被解释为反映了注意力。我们将结合诵读困难中假设的视觉注意问题来讨论这些结果。本研究对数据的多种解释持开放态度,它证明了视觉搜索困难与阅读问题有关,这与越来越多关于发育性阅读障碍中视觉认知问题的文献相一致。
{"title":"Reading problems and their connection with visual search and attention","authors":"Heida Maria Sigurdardottir,&nbsp;Hilma Ros Omarsdottir,&nbsp;Anna Sigridur Valgeirsdottir","doi":"10.1002/dys.1764","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1764","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Attention has been hypothesized to act as a sequential gating mechanism for the orderly processing of letters and words. These same visuoattentional processes are often assumed to partake in some but not all types of visual search. In the current study, 24 dyslexic and 36 typical readers completed an attentionally demanding visual conjunction search. Visual feature search served as an internal control. It has been suggested that reading problems should go hand in hand with specific problems in visual conjunction search—particularly elevated conjunction search slopes (time per search item)—often interpreted as a problem with visual attention. Results showed that reading problems were associated with slower visual search, especially conjunction search. However, reading deficits were not associated with increased conjunction search slopes but instead with increased search intercepts, traditionally not interpreted as reflecting attention. We discuss these results in the context of hypothesized visuoattentional problems in dyslexia. Remaining open to multiple interpretations of the data, the current study demonstrates that difficulties in visual search are associated with reading problems, in accordance with growing literature on visual cognition problems in developmental dyslexia.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139916739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Variability in auditory processing performance is associated with reading difficulties rather than with history of otitis media 听觉处理能力的差异与阅读困难有关,而与中耳炎病史无关。
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1760
Helen L. Breadmore, Lorna F. Halliday, Julia M. Carroll

The nature and cause of auditory processing deficits in dyslexic individuals have been debated for decades. Auditory processing deficits were argued to be the first step in a causal chain of difficulties, leading to difficulties in speech perception and thereby phonological processing and literacy difficulties. More recently, it has been argued that auditory processing difficulties may not be causally related to language and literacy difficulties. This study compares two groups who have phonological processing impairments for different reasons: dyslexia and a history of otitis media (OM). We compared their discrimination thresholds and response variability to chronological age- and reading age-matched controls, across three auditory processing tasks: frequency discrimination, rise-time discrimination and speech perception. Dyslexic children showed raised frequency discrimination thresholds in comparison with age-matched controls but did not differ from reading age-matched controls or individuals with a history of OM. There were no group differences on speech perception or rise-time tasks. For the dyslexic children, there was an association between phonological awareness and frequency discrimination response variability, but no association with thresholds. These findings are not consistent with a ‘causal chain’ explanation but could be accounted for within a multiple deficits view of literacy difficulties.

关于阅读障碍患者听觉处理缺陷的性质和原因,几十年来一直争论不休。听觉处理障碍被认为是导致语言感知困难的因果链中的第一步,进而导致语音处理和读写困难。最近,有人认为听觉处理障碍与语言和读写困难可能没有因果关系。本研究比较了两组因不同原因而存在语音处理障碍的人:诵读困难和中耳炎(OM)病史。我们将他们的辨别阈值和反应变异性与实际年龄和阅读年龄相匹配的对照组进行了比较,包括三项听觉处理任务:频率辨别、上升时间辨别和语音感知。与年龄匹配的对照组相比,读写障碍儿童的频率辨别阈值有所提高,但与阅读年龄匹配的对照组或有 OM 病史的人没有差异。在言语感知或上升时间任务方面,没有任何群体差异。对于阅读障碍儿童,语音意识与频率辨别反应变异性之间存在关联,但与阈值之间没有关联。这些发现与 "因果链 "的解释并不一致,但可以从识字困难的多重缺陷角度加以解释。
{"title":"Variability in auditory processing performance is associated with reading difficulties rather than with history of otitis media","authors":"Helen L. Breadmore,&nbsp;Lorna F. Halliday,&nbsp;Julia M. Carroll","doi":"10.1002/dys.1760","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1760","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The nature and cause of auditory processing deficits in dyslexic individuals have been debated for decades. Auditory processing deficits were argued to be the first step in a causal chain of difficulties, leading to difficulties in speech perception and thereby phonological processing and literacy difficulties. More recently, it has been argued that auditory processing difficulties may not be causally related to language and literacy difficulties. This study compares two groups who have phonological processing impairments for different reasons: dyslexia and a history of otitis media (OM). We compared their discrimination thresholds and response variability to chronological age- and reading age-matched controls, across three auditory processing tasks: frequency discrimination, rise-time discrimination and speech perception. Dyslexic children showed raised frequency discrimination thresholds in comparison with age-matched controls but did not differ from reading age-matched controls or individuals with a history of OM. There were no group differences on speech perception or rise-time tasks. For the dyslexic children, there was an association between phonological awareness and frequency discrimination response variability, but no association with thresholds. These findings are not consistent with a ‘causal chain’ explanation but could be accounted for within a multiple deficits view of literacy difficulties.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dys.1760","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139542743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of morphological density on reading comprehension in Arabic: A comparison between typically developing and children with reading disabilities 形态密度对阿拉伯语阅读理解的影响:典型发育儿童与阅读障碍儿童的比较。
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1761
Ibrahim A. Asadi, Abeer Asli-Badarneh, Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum

This study examined the influence of morphological density on reading comprehension in Arabic and whether this influence differs between typical and children with reading disabilities. Morphological density in Arabic is a text feature that refers to using bound morphemes, creating dense words with more morphemes. The participants were 182 fifth-graders, both typical and children with reading disabilities. Children were assessed in reading comprehension by reading texts with low- or high-morphological density. Findings revealed that overall morphological density impacted reading comprehension performance. That is, scores were found to be higher while reading low-density text than high-density text. Moreover, an interaction of morphological density condition by reading proficiency showed no density text effect among typical developing readers. However, a difference was obtained in the children with reading disabilities whereas low-morphological density text score was higher than the score of high-morphological density text. The study highlights the importance of morphological awareness in reading comprehension in Arabic, extending that morphological density plays an important role in this process. The results are discussed in light of the lexical quality hypothesis and simple view of reading model. The findings imply the need of explicit morphological instruction for dense morphological forms.

本研究探讨了形态密度对阿拉伯语阅读理解的影响,以及这种影响在典型儿童和阅读障碍儿童之间是否存在差异。阿拉伯语中的词形密度是指使用绑定词素,用更多词素创造密集词的一种文本特征。研究对象是 182 名五年级学生,包括典型儿童和阅读障碍儿童。通过阅读形态密度低或高的文本,对儿童的阅读理解能力进行了评估。研究结果表明,整体形态密度会影响阅读理解的成绩。也就是说,阅读低密度文本的得分要高于高密度文本。此外,形态密度条件与阅读能力的交互作用表明,密度文本对典型发展型读者没有影响。然而,在阅读障碍儿童中却出现了差异,低形态密度文本的得分高于高形态密度文本。这项研究强调了形态意识在阿拉伯语阅读理解中的重要性,并延伸出形态密度在这一过程中的重要作用。研究结果根据词汇质量假设和简单阅读模式观点进行了讨论。研究结果表明,有必要对密集形态进行明确的形态教学。
{"title":"The impact of morphological density on reading comprehension in Arabic: A comparison between typically developing and children with reading disabilities","authors":"Ibrahim A. Asadi,&nbsp;Abeer Asli-Badarneh,&nbsp;Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum","doi":"10.1002/dys.1761","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1761","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examined the influence of morphological density on reading comprehension in Arabic and whether this influence differs between typical and children with reading disabilities. Morphological density in Arabic is a text feature that refers to using bound morphemes, creating dense words with more morphemes. The participants were 182 fifth-graders, both typical and children with reading disabilities. Children were assessed in reading comprehension by reading texts with low- or high-morphological density. Findings revealed that overall morphological density impacted reading comprehension performance. That is, scores were found to be higher while reading low-density text than high-density text. Moreover, an interaction of morphological density condition by reading proficiency showed no density text effect among typical developing readers. However, a difference was obtained in the children with reading disabilities whereas low-morphological density text score was higher than the score of high-morphological density text. The study highlights the importance of morphological awareness in reading comprehension in Arabic, extending that morphological density plays an important role in this process. The results are discussed in light of the lexical quality hypothesis and simple view of reading model. The findings imply the need of explicit morphological instruction for dense morphological forms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dys.1761","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139491738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Twice-exceptionality unmasked: A systematic narrative review of the literature on identifying dyslexia in the gifted child 揭开双重特异性的面纱:关于识别资优儿童阅读障碍的系统性文献综述。
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1763
Amanda E. Kranz, Tanya A. Serry, Pamela C. Snow

In this systematic narrative review, we synthesised the small existing body of research on children who are gifted and dyslexic (G-D) in order to investigate the claim that G-D students have a unique profile, characterised by well-masked word-level reading and spelling difficulties. Our focus was on both the cognitive and academic profiles of this subgroup of twice-exceptional (2e) children and the assessment protocols used to identify them. Findings suggest that despite having processing deficits associated with dyslexia, G-D students' gifted strengths, especially those relating to oral language, may enable them to compensate for their reading difficulties, at least to an extent that they fail to meet standard diagnostic criteria. However, G-D students also perform poorly on word-level reading, reading fluency and spelling tasks when compared with both control groups and their gifted, non-dyslexic peers, providing clear evidence of impaired achievement. Findings from this review highlight the need for (a) a more nuanced approach to the assessment of students presenting with highly discrepant profiles and (b) future research into both the cognitive and academic profiles and the instructional needs of this highly able yet poorly understood group of students, whose potential may be masked and thus underestimated in the school setting.

在这篇系统性叙事综述中,我们综合了现有的少量关于资优和阅读障碍儿童(G-D)的研究,以调查G-D学生具有独特特征的说法,其特点是单词水平的阅读和拼写困难。我们的研究重点是两倍特殊儿童(2e)这一子群体的认知和学业概况,以及用于识别他们的评估方案。研究结果表明,尽管 G-D 学生存在与阅读障碍相关的处理缺陷,但他们的天赋优势,尤其是与口语相关的优势,可能使他们能够弥补阅读困难,至少在一定程度上使他们不符合标准诊断标准。然而,与对照组及其资优、无读写障碍的同侪相比,G-D 学生在字词层面的阅读、阅读流畅度和拼写任务方面的表现亦欠佳,提供了成绩受损的明确证据。这篇综述的研究结果突显了以下需要:(a)采用更细致的方法来评估表现出高度差异的学生;(b)未来研究认知和学术方面的情况,以及这群能力很强但却鲜为人知的学生的教学需要,他们的潜力可能会被掩盖,从而在学校环境中被低估。
{"title":"Twice-exceptionality unmasked: A systematic narrative review of the literature on identifying dyslexia in the gifted child","authors":"Amanda E. Kranz,&nbsp;Tanya A. Serry,&nbsp;Pamela C. Snow","doi":"10.1002/dys.1763","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1763","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this systematic narrative review, we synthesised the small existing body of research on children who are gifted and dyslexic (G-D) in order to investigate the claim that G-D students have a unique profile, characterised by well-masked word-level reading and spelling difficulties. Our focus was on both the cognitive and academic profiles of this subgroup of twice-exceptional (2e) children and the assessment protocols used to identify them. Findings suggest that despite having processing deficits associated with dyslexia, G-D students' gifted strengths, especially those relating to oral language, may enable them to compensate for their reading difficulties, at least to an extent that they fail to meet standard diagnostic criteria. However, G-D students also perform poorly on word-level reading, reading fluency and spelling tasks when compared with both control groups and their gifted, non-dyslexic peers, providing clear evidence of impaired achievement. Findings from this review highlight the need for (a) a more nuanced approach to the assessment of students presenting with highly discrepant profiles and (b) future research into both the cognitive and academic profiles and the instructional needs of this highly able yet poorly understood group of students, whose potential may be masked and thus underestimated in the school setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dys.1763","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139486528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The challenge of remote treatment in neuropsychological intervention for reading and spelling in dyslexia: A prospective observational cohort study 对阅读障碍患者的阅读和拼写进行神经心理干预时,远程治疗所面临的挑战:前瞻性观察队列研究。
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1758
Maria Luisa Lorusso, Francesca Borasio, Massimo Molteni

Telemedicine approaches have proved to be valuable solutions for the delivery of treatment for many health-related issues, and crucial during the pandemics. Nonetheless, the efficacy of such Web-based practices in developmental dyslexia needs to be thoroughly evaluated. To this aim, the effects of a multi-componential program for neuropsychological intervention in dyslexia delivered as an outpatient program were compared with those obtained with a remotely delivered, Web-based treatment, based on the same methodological principles and delivered with the same duration and intensity. The treatment-related changes obtained with a combination of visual hemisphere-specific stimulation and training of visual–spatial attention through action video games, were compared to those obtained through remote treatment via the Tachidino Web-based platform. Both treatments had a duration of 4 weeks. The same battery of reading and phonemic awareness tests was delivered in presence, before and after treatment, as well as at 6-months follow-up. User satisfaction was assessed through parents and user questionnaires. Both treatments were significantly and similarly effective in improving reading speed, reading accuracy, and writing accuracy. No reduction in the effects was observed after treatment discontinuation. The Web-based treatment may thus offer a valid alternative to in-person intervention, optimizing the flexibility, capillary diffusion and cost-effectiveness of intervention.

远程医疗方法已被证明是治疗许多健康相关问题的重要解决方案,在大流行病期间更是至关重要。尽管如此,这种基于网络的方法对发育性阅读障碍的疗效仍有待全面评估。为此,研究人员比较了以门诊形式开展的阅读障碍神经心理干预多连贯疗法与远程网络疗法的效果,前者基于相同的方法论原则,治疗时间和强度也相同。通过动作视频游戏结合视觉半球特异性刺激和视觉空间注意力训练所获得的治疗相关变化,与通过 Tachidino 网络平台远程治疗所获得的变化进行了比较。两种治疗方法的持续时间均为 4 周。在治疗前后和 6 个月的随访中,都当场进行了相同的阅读和语音意识测试。用户满意度通过家长和用户问卷进行评估。两种治疗方法在提高阅读速度、阅读准确性和书写准确性方面的效果都非常明显且相似。停止治疗后,效果也没有降低。因此,基于网络的治疗可作为面对面干预的有效替代方案,从而优化干预的灵活性、毛细管扩散和成本效益。
{"title":"The challenge of remote treatment in neuropsychological intervention for reading and spelling in dyslexia: A prospective observational cohort study","authors":"Maria Luisa Lorusso,&nbsp;Francesca Borasio,&nbsp;Massimo Molteni","doi":"10.1002/dys.1758","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1758","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Telemedicine approaches have proved to be valuable solutions for the delivery of treatment for many health-related issues, and crucial during the pandemics. Nonetheless, the efficacy of such Web-based practices in developmental dyslexia needs to be thoroughly evaluated. To this aim, the effects of a multi-componential program for neuropsychological intervention in dyslexia delivered as an outpatient program were compared with those obtained with a remotely delivered, Web-based treatment, based on the same methodological principles and delivered with the same duration and intensity. The treatment-related changes obtained with a combination of visual hemisphere-specific stimulation and training of visual–spatial attention through action video games, were compared to those obtained through remote treatment via the Tachidino Web-based platform. Both treatments had a duration of 4 weeks. The same battery of reading and phonemic awareness tests was delivered in presence, before and after treatment, as well as at 6-months follow-up. User satisfaction was assessed through parents and user questionnaires. Both treatments were significantly and similarly effective in improving reading speed, reading accuracy, and writing accuracy. No reduction in the effects was observed after treatment discontinuation. The Web-based treatment may thus offer a valid alternative to in-person intervention, optimizing the flexibility, capillary diffusion and cost-effectiveness of intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dys.1758","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139466097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parent experiences of specific learning disorder diagnosis: A scoping review 特殊学习障碍诊断的家长经验:范围审查。
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1757
Hayley Anthony, Andrea Reupert, Louise McLean

The purpose of this review was to scope the quantity and methodological characteristics of the current literature examining parent and caregivers' perspectives of specific learning disorder (SLD) diagnosis, synthesise key findings and highlight gaps in the current literature. A systematic search was conducted for the period January 2013 to March 2023. Twenty-three articles, representing 1796 parents and caregivers across seven countries, underwent data extraction. The review highlighted considerable variability regarding the main aim and scope of each included study and that most studies used qualitative or mixed method methodology. Three central parts of the diagnostic experience were identified: pathway to assessment, assessment process, and advocating and coordinating support post-diagnosis. A final theme, broader social and political issues, was also identified. The findings highlight that parents of children with SLDs experienced a similar battle to obtain a diagnosis and access post-diagnostic support as parents of children with other neurodevelopmental disorders. This provides some evidence that, internationally, parent needs in the time surrounding SLD diagnostic assessment are not being met, with substantial barriers to timely assessment and inadequate post-diagnosis support. Future research and implications for practice are explored.

本综述的目的是对当前研究家长和照顾者对特殊学习障碍(SLD)诊断的看法的文献的数量和方法特点进行概括,对主要研究结果进行综合,并强调当前文献中的不足之处。我们对 2013 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月期间的文献进行了系统检索。对代表七个国家 1796 名家长和看护人的 23 篇文章进行了数据提取。综述强调了每项纳入研究的主要目的和范围存在相当大的差异,而且大多数研究都采用了定性或混合方法。研究确定了诊断经验的三个核心部分:评估途径、评估过程以及诊断后的宣传和协调支持。最后一个主题是更广泛的社会和政治问题。研究结果突出表明,与其他神经发育障碍儿童的家长一样,患有特殊学习障碍儿童的家长在获得诊断和诊断后支持方面也经历了类似的斗争。这提供了一些证据,表明在国际范围内,家长在进行 SLD 诊断评估期间的需求没有得到满足,及时评估面临巨大障碍,诊断后支持不足。本文探讨了未来的研究和对实践的影响。
{"title":"Parent experiences of specific learning disorder diagnosis: A scoping review","authors":"Hayley Anthony,&nbsp;Andrea Reupert,&nbsp;Louise McLean","doi":"10.1002/dys.1757","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1757","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this review was to scope the quantity and methodological characteristics of the current literature examining parent and caregivers' perspectives of specific learning disorder (SLD) diagnosis, synthesise key findings and highlight gaps in the current literature. A systematic search was conducted for the period January 2013 to March 2023. Twenty-three articles, representing 1796 parents and caregivers across seven countries, underwent data extraction. The review highlighted considerable variability regarding the main aim and scope of each included study and that most studies used qualitative or mixed method methodology. Three central parts of the diagnostic experience were identified: pathway to assessment, assessment process, and advocating and coordinating support post-diagnosis. A final theme, broader social and political issues, was also identified. The findings highlight that parents of children with SLDs experienced a similar battle to obtain a diagnosis and access post-diagnostic support as parents of children with other neurodevelopmental disorders. This provides some evidence that, internationally, parent needs in the time surrounding SLD diagnostic assessment are not being met, with substantial barriers to timely assessment and inadequate post-diagnosis support. Future research and implications for practice are explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dys.1757","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139098857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Insights from a Web-based survey into the psychosocial experiences of adults with dyslexia: Findings from a final comment question 一项基于网络的阅读障碍成年人心理社会体验调查的见解:最后一个评论问题的发现。
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2023-10-25 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1756
Blace A. Nalavany, Reeve Kennedy, Mi Hwa Lee, Lena W. Carawan, Sharon M. Knight

Not seemingly measuring up to Western societies' educational and occupational expectations for success, adults with dyslexia are at risk for discrimination, humiliation, low self-esteem, low self-efficacy, depression, and anxiety. We analysed 113 responses to the final comment question that was incorporated at the end of a quantitative survey on the socioemotional experiences of adults with dyslexia. The final comment question was not intended for conveying personal experiences, yet the final comment responses were personal, in-depth, and substantive – indicators of quality recommended in survey research. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data and develop themes. One overarching theme was yearnings for understanding and acceptance. Its associated subthemes included (1) “This stuff is torture”, (2) “Thank God I'm not normal, (3) educational experience, (4) coping strategies, (5) family support, and (6) generational dyslexia. This study contributes to the small but growing body of literature on the socioemotional experiences of adults with dyslexia. Among the implications for practice, policy and research, a larger challenge at the broader society level that embraces diversity, equity, and inclusion for individuals with dyslexia is forefront.

患有阅读障碍的成年人似乎达不到西方社会对成功的教育和职业期望,他们面临着歧视、羞辱、自卑、低自我效能、抑郁和焦虑的风险。我们分析了113个对最后评论问题的回答,该问题是在一项关于阅读障碍成年人社会情感体验的定量调查结束时纳入的。最后的评论问题不是为了传达个人经历,但最后的评论回答是个人的、深入的和实质性的——这是调查研究中建议的质量指标。专题分析用于分析数据和制定专题。一个重要主题是渴望理解和接受。其相关的副标题包括(1)“这东西是折磨”,(2)“感谢上帝,我不正常,(3)教育经历,(4)应对策略,(5)家庭支持,以及(6)世代阅读障碍。这项研究为关于患有阅读障碍的成年人的社会情感经历的少量但不断增长的文献做出了贡献。在对实践、政策和研究的影响中,在更广泛的社会层面上,对阅读障碍患者的多样性、公平性和包容性提出了更大的挑战。
{"title":"Insights from a Web-based survey into the psychosocial experiences of adults with dyslexia: Findings from a final comment question","authors":"Blace A. Nalavany,&nbsp;Reeve Kennedy,&nbsp;Mi Hwa Lee,&nbsp;Lena W. Carawan,&nbsp;Sharon M. Knight","doi":"10.1002/dys.1756","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1756","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Not seemingly measuring up to Western societies' educational and occupational expectations for success, adults with dyslexia are at risk for discrimination, humiliation, low self-esteem, low self-efficacy, depression, and anxiety. We analysed 113 responses to the final comment question that was incorporated at the end of a quantitative survey on the socioemotional experiences of adults with dyslexia. The final comment question was not intended for conveying personal experiences, yet the final comment responses were personal, in-depth, and substantive – indicators of quality recommended in survey research. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data and develop themes. One overarching theme was yearnings for understanding and acceptance. Its associated subthemes included (1) “This stuff is torture”, (2) “Thank God I'm not normal, (3) educational experience, (4) coping strategies, (5) family support, and (6) generational dyslexia. This study contributes to the small but growing body of literature on the socioemotional experiences of adults with dyslexia. Among the implications for practice, policy and research, a larger challenge at the broader society level that embraces diversity, equity, and inclusion for individuals with dyslexia is forefront.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"29 4","pages":"441-458"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dys.1756","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50163237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Dyslexia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1