Pub Date : 1998-06-01DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962594
S. Reyna, N. Schiller
{"title":"The pursuit of knowledge and regimes of truth","authors":"S. Reyna, N. Schiller","doi":"10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962594","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962594","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47227,"journal":{"name":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","volume":"108 1","pages":"333-341"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75945797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1998-06-01DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962597
S. Reyna
This article explains why the community of scholars in the current conjuncture of the capitalist development of power experiences problems distinguishing between right and might and suggests a way of reducing such difficulties. It claims that the mightys’ operation of regimes of truth in conjunction with intellectuals’ adoption of postmodern sentiments erodes the ability to judge whether those with might have it right. This position is argued by considering a particular assertion of righteousness. The Indonesian and US mighty, as represented by Geertz, claimed that the Indonesian military's 1965–66 massacres were in self‐defense. “Causal moral analysis” is formulated as a method of assessing this claim.
{"title":"Right and might: of approximate truths and moral judgements","authors":"S. Reyna","doi":"10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962597","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962597","url":null,"abstract":"This article explains why the community of scholars in the current conjuncture of the capitalist development of power experiences problems distinguishing between right and might and suggests a way of reducing such difficulties. It claims that the mightys’ operation of regimes of truth in conjunction with intellectuals’ adoption of postmodern sentiments erodes the ability to judge whether those with might have it right. This position is argued by considering a particular assertion of righteousness. The Indonesian and US mighty, as represented by Geertz, claimed that the Indonesian military's 1965–66 massacres were in self‐defense. “Causal moral analysis” is formulated as a method of assessing this claim.","PeriodicalId":47227,"journal":{"name":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","volume":"22 1","pages":"431-465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81808353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1998-06-01DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962602
B. Santos
Though different in style and approach these three texts have much in common. Even if mentioned explicitly only in Reyna, the debate on the modern versus the postmodern is present in all of them; all of them question the validity of modern scientific knowledge, as well as the dichotomy of subject/object that makes privileged validity claims possible; all of them are keenly aware of the cultural, political, and institutional embeddedness of modern science; finally, the theme of the Cold War and of Cold War science is present in all of them. In spite of all these convergences, however, there are significant differences among the three papers. While Price and Hancock present a critique of modern science, Reyna criticizes Geertz's postmodern science from a modernist viewpoint. While, for Price, the Cold War political establishment and its current reincarnations define populations and themes as objects of imperialist intervention which the Cold War scientific establishment transforms into objects of scientific inquiry, for Hancock, both the relation between subject and object and the process of intervention are more complex, since neither of them can operate without the active cooperation of the "object" or the "intervened." On the one hand, the subject/object relation is mediated by the presence of the "indigenous scholar," who is both a subject and an object of knowledge, a form of personalized authentic native knowledge provided by someone that is simultaneously an informant or student and a professor. On the other hand, the Cold War politico-scientific intervention is made possible by the active participation of local elites, interested in converting their specific kind of nationalism into the (general)
{"title":"Why we can't afford to be innocent","authors":"B. Santos","doi":"10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962602","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962602","url":null,"abstract":"Though different in style and approach these three texts have much in common. Even if mentioned explicitly only in Reyna, the debate on the modern versus the postmodern is present in all of them; all of them question the validity of modern scientific knowledge, as well as the dichotomy of subject/object that makes privileged validity claims possible; all of them are keenly aware of the cultural, political, and institutional embeddedness of modern science; finally, the theme of the Cold War and of Cold War science is present in all of them. In spite of all these convergences, however, there are significant differences among the three papers. While Price and Hancock present a critique of modern science, Reyna criticizes Geertz's postmodern science from a modernist viewpoint. While, for Price, the Cold War political establishment and its current reincarnations define populations and themes as objects of imperialist intervention which the Cold War scientific establishment transforms into objects of scientific inquiry, for Hancock, both the relation between subject and object and the process of intervention are more complex, since neither of them can operate without the active cooperation of the \"object\" or the \"intervened.\" On the one hand, the subject/object relation is mediated by the presence of the \"indigenous scholar,\" who is both a subject and an object of knowledge, a form of personalized authentic native knowledge provided by someone that is simultaneously an informant or student and a professor. On the other hand, the Cold War politico-scientific intervention is made possible by the active participation of local elites, interested in converting their specific kind of nationalism into the (general)","PeriodicalId":47227,"journal":{"name":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","volume":"30 1","pages":"529-533"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87633370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1998-06-01DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962601
J. Gledhill
{"title":"Contesting Regimes of Truth: Continuity and Change in the Relationships Between Intellectuals and Power","authors":"J. Gledhill","doi":"10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962601","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962601","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47227,"journal":{"name":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","volume":"77 1","pages":"515-528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72966634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1998-06-01DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962599
E. Ross
{"title":"Cold warriors without weapons","authors":"E. Ross","doi":"10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962599","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962599","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47227,"journal":{"name":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","volume":"174 1","pages":"475-506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76905726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1998-06-01DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962600
Antonio Lauria‐Perricelli
{"title":"Knowledge and truth? Anthropological research, foundations, universities, and political and social forces","authors":"Antonio Lauria‐Perricelli","doi":"10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962600","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962600","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47227,"journal":{"name":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","volume":"96 1","pages":"507-513"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78558901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1998-06-01DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962604
S. Feuchtwang
{"title":"Political judgement and academic freedom","authors":"S. Feuchtwang","doi":"10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962604","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47227,"journal":{"name":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","volume":"10 1","pages":"551-559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87871865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1998-06-01DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962598
R. Reddock
{"title":"(Post) Colonial encounters of the academic kind: The national security question","authors":"R. Reddock","doi":"10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962598","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962598","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47227,"journal":{"name":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","volume":"1 1","pages":"467-474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88310941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1998-06-01DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962595
M. Hancock
This essay contextualizes and interrogates Milton Singer's When a Great Tradition Modernizes, an influential study of Sanskritic Hinduism and its elite exponents in urban south India. Singer's fieldwork (1954–1964) depended heavily on the assistance of an Indian Sanskritist, V. Raghavan. I focus on their collaboration as it is represented in the published works of both, and consider its implications for South Asia area studies in the US. In their reliance on ethnographic methods, area studies projects offered transnational sites for the consolidation of nationalist discourses—for while Raghavan strategically used ethnographic interactions to fashion and disseminate elite nationalism in India, Singer used India (as mediated by Raghavan) as a “case” in the formulation of civilizational studies and theories of modernization. Analysis of this case illuminates the current contradictions generated by area studies’ reliance on paradigms of nationhood. Deconstruction of the “nation” is coupled with reconstruction...
{"title":"Unmaking the ‘great tradition’: Ethnography, national culture and area studies","authors":"M. Hancock","doi":"10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962595","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962595","url":null,"abstract":"This essay contextualizes and interrogates Milton Singer's When a Great Tradition Modernizes, an influential study of Sanskritic Hinduism and its elite exponents in urban south India. Singer's fieldwork (1954–1964) depended heavily on the assistance of an Indian Sanskritist, V. Raghavan. I focus on their collaboration as it is represented in the published works of both, and consider its implications for South Asia area studies in the US. In their reliance on ethnographic methods, area studies projects offered transnational sites for the consolidation of nationalist discourses—for while Raghavan strategically used ethnographic interactions to fashion and disseminate elite nationalism in India, Singer used India (as mediated by Raghavan) as a “case” in the formulation of civilizational studies and theories of modernization. Analysis of this case illuminates the current contradictions generated by area studies’ reliance on paradigms of nationhood. Deconstruction of the “nation” is coupled with reconstruction...","PeriodicalId":47227,"journal":{"name":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","volume":"55 1","pages":"343-388"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80933811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1998-06-01DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962596
D. Price
This paper examines some of the interactions between anthropologists and America's National Security State during the Cold War. The Human Ecology Fund, an anthropological funding front used by the Central Intelligence Agency in the 1950s and 1960s, is discussed to elucidate one of the ways that the National Security State sponsored and consumed anthropological knowledge Clyde Kluckhohn's secret interactions with the FBI, State Department, and CIA are discussed to exemplify how some scholars covertly interacted with intelligence agencies during the Cold War. Finally, documents from anthropologist Melville Jacobs’ troubles at the University of Washington for his Marxist political associations indicate ways in which radical anthropologists were persecuted. It is argued that despite the proclaimed end of the Cold War, many of the features of the National Security State are still in place, as are new interfaces between the military‐intelligence agencies and the academy.
本文考察了冷战期间人类学家与美国国家安全状态之间的一些相互作用。人类生态基金是中央情报局在20世纪50年代和60年代使用的一个人类学资助前沿，本文讨论了国家安全局资助和消耗人类学知识的一种方式。Clyde Kluckhohn与联邦调查局、国务院和中央情报局的秘密互动，以举例说明一些学者在冷战期间如何与情报机构秘密互动。最后，人类学家梅尔维尔·雅各布斯(Melville Jacobs)在华盛顿大学(University of Washington)因其马克思主义政治协会而遭遇麻烦的文件表明，激进人类学家受到迫害的方式。有人认为，尽管宣布冷战结束，但国家安全国家的许多特征仍然存在，军事情报机构和学院之间的新接口也仍然存在。
{"title":"Cold war anthropology: Collaborators and victims of the national security state","authors":"D. Price","doi":"10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962596","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962596","url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines some of the interactions between anthropologists and America's National Security State during the Cold War. The Human Ecology Fund, an anthropological funding front used by the Central Intelligence Agency in the 1950s and 1960s, is discussed to elucidate one of the ways that the National Security State sponsored and consumed anthropological knowledge Clyde Kluckhohn's secret interactions with the FBI, State Department, and CIA are discussed to exemplify how some scholars covertly interacted with intelligence agencies during the Cold War. Finally, documents from anthropologist Melville Jacobs’ troubles at the University of Washington for his Marxist political associations indicate ways in which radical anthropologists were persecuted. It is argued that despite the proclaimed end of the Cold War, many of the features of the National Security State are still in place, as are new interfaces between the military‐intelligence agencies and the academy.","PeriodicalId":47227,"journal":{"name":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","volume":"126 1","pages":"389-430"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74313780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：