Pub Date : 2020-06-18DOI: 10.25267/commons.2020.v9.i1.3
A. I. Flores, María Rebeca Padilla de la Torre, A. Reyes
This article analyzes the implementation of two exercises in capacity building in Communication for Development and Social Change (CDSC), with university students in two public sector universities in Central-Western Mexico: the University of Colima and the Autonomous University of Aguascalientes. Both projects focused on participatory communication and media production: “Media Lab for Active Media Production” and a “Social Communication Workshop”. The purpose of this paper is to share best practices in capacity building as well as the outcomes that emerged from the exercises. The learning approaches and outcomes that emerged may be relevant for future CDSC programs. The approach sought to strengthen of future ‘communicators’ as key catalysts of development and community social impact. The authors hope that these experiences can be applied to other university programs and curricula in communication, both at undergraduate and graduate levels.
{"title":"Formación de comunicadores para el Desarrollo y el Cambio Social. Análisis de experiencias en el centrooccidente de México / Training communicators for Development and Social Change. Analysis of experiences in Center-West Mexico","authors":"A. I. Flores, María Rebeca Padilla de la Torre, A. Reyes","doi":"10.25267/commons.2020.v9.i1.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25267/commons.2020.v9.i1.3","url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the implementation of two exercises in capacity building in Communication for Development and Social Change (CDSC), with university students in two public sector universities in Central-Western Mexico: the University of Colima and the Autonomous University of Aguascalientes. Both projects focused on participatory communication and media production: “Media Lab for Active Media Production” and a “Social Communication Workshop”. The purpose of this paper is to share best practices in capacity building as well as the outcomes that emerged from the exercises. The learning approaches and outcomes that emerged may be relevant for future CDSC programs. The approach sought to strengthen of future ‘communicators’ as key catalysts of development and community social impact. The authors hope that these experiences can be applied to other university programs and curricula in communication, both at undergraduate and graduate levels.","PeriodicalId":47250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Commons","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86611620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Managing the wildland-urban interface (WUI) is a widely-recognized land use problem plagued by a fractured geography of land parcels, management jurisdictions, and governance mandates and objectives. People who work in this field have suggested a variety of approaches to managing this interface, from informal governance to contracting to insurance. To date, however, none of these scholars have fully embraced the dynamism, uncertainty, and complexity of the WUI — that is, its status as a complex adaptive system. In focusing almost exclusively on the management of this interface to control wildfire, this scholarship largely ignores the factor that rampant wildfire is itself the product of incursions into important ecosystem services on both sides of the interface. In many cases, people tend to expand out towards the wildland not just for economics (cheaper housing) but also because of a suite of ecosystem services that are readily accessible at the interface, including aesthetics, a cleaner environment, and recreational opportunities. As the wildfire problem amply demonstrates, these settlers then become upset when other aspects of ecosystem function invade their lives, but those invasions include not just wildfire disasters but also more pernicious problems such as diseases, allergens, and wildlife. As such, development at the WUI can create a multifaceted desire to control several "undesirable" aspects of ecosystem function while simultaneously promoting the ecosystem services that residents desire, complicating land use management on both sides of a line that is itself often moving or transforming into a transition or buffer zone. To focus solely on wildfire, in other words, may oversimplify an increasingly complex management problem with significant policy implications. While we cannot and will not attempt to resolve all of these policy issues in this article, we do propose that adaptive management may provide a mechanism for dealing with the complexity of managing changing ecosystem functions and services at the WUI, even when — and perhaps especially because — the private lands and wildlands are usually subject to different land use regimes. We begin with an overview of adaptive management, then discuss the hard but common case of fractured landscape management. We then explore the potential for adaptive management to help negotiate this fractured landscape in a changing world, starting with the classic issue of wildfire management but also suggesting possible expansions.
{"title":"Adaptive Management for Ecosystem Services Across the Wildland-Urban\u0000 Interface","authors":"Robin Kundis Craig, J. B. Ruhl","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3407579","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3407579","url":null,"abstract":"Managing the wildland-urban interface (WUI) is a widely-recognized land use problem plagued by a fractured geography of land parcels, management jurisdictions, and governance mandates and objectives. People who work in this field have suggested a variety of approaches to managing this interface, from informal governance to contracting to insurance. To date, however, none of these scholars have fully embraced the dynamism, uncertainty, and complexity of the WUI — that is, its status as a complex adaptive system. In focusing almost exclusively on the management of this interface to control wildfire, this scholarship largely ignores the factor that rampant wildfire is itself the product of incursions into important ecosystem services on both sides of the interface. In many cases, people tend to expand out towards the wildland not just for economics (cheaper housing) but also because of a suite of ecosystem services that are readily accessible at the interface, including aesthetics, a cleaner environment, and recreational opportunities. As the wildfire problem amply demonstrates, these settlers then become upset when other aspects of ecosystem function invade their lives, but those invasions include not just wildfire disasters but also more pernicious problems such as diseases, allergens, and wildlife. As such, development at the WUI can create a multifaceted desire to control several \"undesirable\" aspects of ecosystem function while simultaneously promoting the ecosystem services that residents desire, complicating land use management on both sides of a line that is itself often moving or transforming into a transition or buffer zone. To focus solely on wildfire, in other words, may oversimplify an increasingly complex management problem with significant policy implications. \u0000 \u0000While we cannot and will not attempt to resolve all of these policy issues in this article, we do propose that adaptive management may provide a mechanism for dealing with the complexity of managing changing ecosystem functions and services at the WUI, even when — and perhaps especially because — the private lands and wildlands are usually subject to different land use regimes. We begin with an overview of adaptive management, then discuss the hard but common case of fractured landscape management. We then explore the potential for adaptive management to help negotiate this fractured landscape in a changing world, starting with the classic issue of wildfire management but also suggesting possible expansions.","PeriodicalId":47250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Commons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2020-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49366256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Farjam, T. Moor, R. V. Weeren, A. Forsman, M. Dehkordi, A. Ghorbani, Giangiacomo Bravo
We present an analysis of regulatory activities in historical commons offering a unique picture of their long-term institutional dynamics. The analysis took into account almost 3,800 regulatory activities in eighteen European commons in two countries across seven centuries. Despite differences in time and space, we found a shared pattern where an initial, highly-dynamic institutional-definition phase was followed by a relatively long period of stability and a final burst of activities, possibly in an attempt to respond to new challenges. In addition, most of the initial regulatory activities focused on resource use, while towards the end other activities prevailed. Our approach allows for a better understanding of institutional dynamics and our findings also provide important insights about how to regulate the use of current natural resources.
{"title":"Shared Patterns in Long-Term Dynamics of Commons as Institutions for Collective Action","authors":"M. Farjam, T. Moor, R. V. Weeren, A. Forsman, M. Dehkordi, A. Ghorbani, Giangiacomo Bravo","doi":"10.5334/ijc.959","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.959","url":null,"abstract":"We present an analysis of regulatory activities in historical commons offering a unique picture of their long-term institutional dynamics. The analysis took into account almost 3,800 regulatory activities in eighteen European commons in two countries across seven centuries. Despite differences in time and space, we found a shared pattern where an initial, highly-dynamic institutional-definition phase was followed by a relatively long period of stability and a final burst of activities, possibly in an attempt to respond to new challenges. In addition, most of the initial regulatory activities focused on resource use, while towards the end other activities prevailed. Our approach allows for a better understanding of institutional dynamics and our findings also provide important insights about how to regulate the use of current natural resources.","PeriodicalId":47250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Commons","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2020-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71071290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-31DOI: 10.1525/9780520927841-003
{"title":"LAMENTA","authors":"","doi":"10.1525/9780520927841-003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520927841-003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Commons","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73719202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-31DOI: 10.1525/9780520927841-fm
{"title":"Frontmatter","authors":"","doi":"10.1525/9780520927841-fm","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520927841-fm","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Commons","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86608109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-31DOI: 10.1525/9780520927841-001
{"title":"ACKNOWLEDGMENTS","authors":"","doi":"10.1525/9780520927841-001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520927841-001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Commons","volume":"508 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75227116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-18DOI: 10.25267/commons.2019.v8.i2.04
Paloma Rubin, Agustín Zanotti
The paper analyzes processes of collaborative production in Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, taking the case of the article Aborto en Argentina (Abortion in Argentina) of its Spanish edition. Debate generated during a bill treatment on Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy in 2018, implied a strong mobilization of public opinion in a dispute between "pro-choice" and "pro-life" positions. All this within a techno-communication ecosystem where social software platforms coexist with mass media. Presentation is developed in four areas: 1. evolution of the article; 2. editions and editors profile; 3. discussions and controversies; 4. sources usage for content validation. The article is based on a quantitative-qualitative analysis of available data on the platform, fueling a reflection on digital methods.
本文分析了自由百科全书维基百科的协作生产过程，以其西班牙语版的文章Aborto en Argentina(阿根廷堕胎)为例。2018年，一项关于自愿终止妊娠的法案在处理过程中引发了辩论，这意味着在“支持选择”和“反对堕胎”的立场之间的争论中，公众舆论被强烈动员起来。所有这一切都发生在一个社交软件平台与大众媒体共存的技术交流生态系统中。演示在四个方面得到发展:1。文章的演变;2. 版本和编辑简介;3.讨论与争议;4. 用于内容验证的源用法。这篇文章是基于对平台上可用数据的定量定性分析，引发了对数字方法的反思。
{"title":"Escribir la Historia: activismo en wikipedia y el debate por la despenalización del aborto en Argentina.","authors":"Paloma Rubin, Agustín Zanotti","doi":"10.25267/commons.2019.v8.i2.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25267/commons.2019.v8.i2.04","url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyzes processes of collaborative production in Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, taking the case of the article Aborto en Argentina (Abortion in Argentina) of its Spanish edition. Debate generated during a bill treatment on Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy in 2018, implied a strong mobilization of public opinion in a dispute between \"pro-choice\" and \"pro-life\" positions. All this within a techno-communication ecosystem where social software platforms coexist with mass media. Presentation is developed in four areas: 1. evolution of the article; 2. editions and editors profile; 3. discussions and controversies; 4. sources usage for content validation. The article is based on a quantitative-qualitative analysis of available data on the platform, fueling a reflection on digital methods.","PeriodicalId":47250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Commons","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78344250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
espanolEl articulo propone un enfoque integrador de los espacios conversacionales online y su dimension politica, a partir de la articulacion de diversos actores institucionales y mediaticos que intervienen en el desarrollo el debate publico en Cuba. Para tanto, se aborda el concepto de politizacion de conversaciones online, a fin de destacar la interrelacion entre dimensiones del contexto y discurso en las interacciones. Asi, se analizan las conversaciones sobre migracion en Cubadebate entre 2013 y 2017; complementando el analisis con entrevistas realizadas a directores y periodistas del medio. De esa forma, evidenciamos como ese espacio comunicativo funciona simultaneamente como foro de discusion, canal de comunicacion con el gobierno y vehiculo de discusion de la pauta noticiosa del medio. Por fin, observamos que la conversacion online puede politizarse tambien a partir de su entrelazamiento con experiencias offline y de la reelaboracion discursiva de la existencia de los sujetos que conversan EnglishThe article proposes an integrative approach to online conversational spaces and their political dimension, based on the articulation of various institutional and media actors involved in the development of public debate in Cuba. Therefore, the concept of politicization of online conversations is discussed, in order to highlight the interrelation between dimensions of context and discourse in those interactions. Thus, we analyze conversations on migration issues in Cubadebate between 2013 and 2017; complementing the analysis with interviews made to directors and journalists of the site. In this way, we show how this communicative space functions simultaneously as a discussion forum, a channel of communication with the government and a vehicle for discussing the news agenda of the media. Finally, we observe that the online conversation can also be politicized from its intertwining with offline experiences and from the discursive reconfiguration of subjects existence
这篇文章提出了一种在线对话空间及其政治维度的综合方法，基于参与古巴公共辩论发展的各种机构和媒体参与者的表达。因此，本文提出了网络对话政治化的概念，以强调语境维度与互动话语之间的相互关系。因此，分析了2013年至2017年古巴辩论中的移民对话;通过对媒体导演和记者的采访来补充分析。通过这种方式，我们展示了这个传播空间是如何同时作为一个讨论论坛、与政府沟通的渠道和媒体议程的讨论工具的。在线谈话,我们终于可以脱机政治化,也是交错的经验起和reelaboracion高谈阔论存在的家伙,在EnglishThe条政见an approach to online conversational spaces及其政治中心dimension, based on the articulation法律体制和媒体讨论非国家行为体in the development of public in古巴。因此，本文讨论了网络对话政治化的概念，以突出这些互动中语境维度与话语维度之间的相互关系。因此，我们分析了2013年至2017年古巴辩论中关于移民问题的对话;通过对网站导演和记者的采访来补充分析。通过这种方式，我们展示了这个交流空间如何同时作为一个讨论论坛、一个与政府沟通的渠道和一个讨论媒体新闻议程的工具发挥作用。最后，我们注意到，网络对话也可以被政治化，因为它与线下经验的相互作用和主体存在的话语重构
{"title":"El debate público online en Cuba: sujetos interlocutores y politización de conversaciones sobre migración en el sitio Cubadebate.","authors":"Elisa Beatriz Ramírez Hernández, Ângela Cristina Salgueiro Marques","doi":"10.25267/commons.2019.v8.i2.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25267/commons.2019.v8.i2.03","url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl articulo propone un enfoque integrador de los espacios conversacionales online y su dimension politica, a partir de la articulacion de diversos actores institucionales y mediaticos que intervienen en el desarrollo el debate publico en Cuba. Para tanto, se aborda el concepto de politizacion de conversaciones online, a fin de destacar la interrelacion entre dimensiones del contexto y discurso en las interacciones. Asi, se analizan las conversaciones sobre migracion en Cubadebate entre 2013 y 2017; complementando el analisis con entrevistas realizadas a directores y periodistas del medio. De esa forma, evidenciamos como ese espacio comunicativo funciona simultaneamente como foro de discusion, canal de comunicacion con el gobierno y vehiculo de discusion de la pauta noticiosa del medio. Por fin, observamos que la conversacion online puede politizarse tambien a partir de su entrelazamiento con experiencias offline y de la reelaboracion discursiva de la existencia de los sujetos que conversan EnglishThe article proposes an integrative approach to online conversational spaces and their political dimension, based on the articulation of various institutional and media actors involved in the development of public debate in Cuba. Therefore, the concept of politicization of online conversations is discussed, in order to highlight the interrelation between dimensions of context and discourse in those interactions. Thus, we analyze conversations on migration issues in Cubadebate between 2013 and 2017; complementing the analysis with interviews made to directors and journalists of the site. In this way, we show how this communicative space functions simultaneously as a discussion forum, a channel of communication with the government and a vehicle for discussing the news agenda of the media. Finally, we observe that the online conversation can also be politicized from its intertwining with offline experiences and from the discursive reconfiguration of subjects existence","PeriodicalId":47250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Commons","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84578246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-01DOI: 10.25267/commons.2019.v8.i2.01
E. Margiolakis
espanolDurante la ultima dictadura argentina (1976-1983), un conjunto de publicaciones culturales desafio los limites impuestos por el poder hegemonico militar en relacion con su propuesta de intervencion politico-cultural, su ubicacion en el mercado de los bienes simbolicos y el rescate de tradiciones que confrontaron con la denominada cultura oficial, entre otros aspectos. Por esta razon, recibieron la denominacion de revistas contraculturales, subterraneas o underground. A partir de 1978 y durante la denominada transicion argentina, dichas publicaciones polemizaron con aquellas intervenciones que, desde el exilio, identificaron la produccion cultural de quienes permanecieron desde la inaccion, la quietud y el silencio. El exilio y la permanencia implicaron la construccion de redes de solidaridad en torno a padecer y denunciar los mecanismos de censura, prohibicion y persecucion del regimen militar. Sin embargo, tambien se establecio una serie de tensiones entre el “adentro” y el “afuera”, que nos proponemos reponer en este articulo EnglishDuring the last Argentine dictatorship (1976-1983), a group of cultural magazines challenged the restrictions imposed by hegemonic military power through their proposal of politic and cultural intervention, their place in the symbolic market and the recovery of traditions that contended against the so-called official culture, among other things. Consequently, they came to be designated as countercultu-ral or underground magazines. Since 1978 and during the so-called Argentine transition, those magazines engaged in a dispute with those manifestations that, form the exile, equated their cultural production of those people who remained with the inaction, the stillness, and the silent. Between the exile and those who remained in the country, a solidarity network was established based on the suffering and denunciation of the military regime’s censorship, prohibition, and persecution. But also a series of tensions between “inside” and “outside”, which we intend to revisit in this paper, was established
espanolDurante最后阿根廷独裁1976-1983出版物),一套文化挑战极限税收权力hegemonico军事关系的诺提案politico-cultural,他们的资产市场ubicacion simbolicos和拯救传统先辈满怀希望与所谓的官方文化等方面。由于这个原因，他们被称为反文化杂志，地下或地下。从1978年开始，在所谓的阿根廷过渡时期，这些出版物与那些流亡的人的干预进行了辩论，这些干预确定了那些从不作为、沉默和沉默中保持的人的文化生产。流亡和永久意味着建立团结网络，以忍受和谴责军事政权的审查、禁止和迫害机制。然而,他也是establecio之间紧张关系的一系列“内”和“外”,我们想要实现的补充在这篇EnglishDuring最近阿根廷dictatorship(1976-1983)、《a group of文化杂志提出的限制就由hegemonic military power through politic文化和干预的提案》,其place in the symbolic market and the recovery of传统that contended against the建议官方文化书籍other things。Consequently,他们来to be指定as countercultu-ral or underground杂志。自1978年以来，在所谓的阿根廷转型期间，这些杂志与那些表现形式的流亡，平衡了他们的文化生产，这些人保持着不作为、静止和沉默。在流亡者和留在该国的人之间建立了一个团结网络，其基础是对军事政权审查、禁止和迫害的痛苦和谴责。但是，我们打算在本文中回顾的“内部”和“外部”之间的一系列紧张关系也已确立
{"title":"Revistas contraculturales argentinas en dictadura y transición: debates alrededor del exilio.","authors":"E. Margiolakis","doi":"10.25267/commons.2019.v8.i2.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25267/commons.2019.v8.i2.01","url":null,"abstract":"espanolDurante la ultima dictadura argentina (1976-1983), un conjunto de publicaciones culturales desafio los limites impuestos por el poder hegemonico militar en relacion con su propuesta de intervencion politico-cultural, su ubicacion en el mercado de los bienes simbolicos y el rescate de tradiciones que confrontaron con la denominada cultura oficial, entre otros aspectos. Por esta razon, recibieron la denominacion de revistas contraculturales, subterraneas o underground. A partir de 1978 y durante la denominada transicion argentina, dichas publicaciones polemizaron con aquellas intervenciones que, desde el exilio, identificaron la produccion cultural de quienes permanecieron desde la inaccion, la quietud y el silencio. El exilio y la permanencia implicaron la construccion de redes de solidaridad en torno a padecer y denunciar los mecanismos de censura, prohibicion y persecucion del regimen militar. Sin embargo, tambien se establecio una serie de tensiones entre el “adentro” y el “afuera”, que nos proponemos reponer en este articulo EnglishDuring the last Argentine dictatorship (1976-1983), a group of cultural magazines challenged the restrictions imposed by hegemonic military power through their proposal of politic and cultural intervention, their place in the symbolic market and the recovery of traditions that contended against the so-called official culture, among other things. Consequently, they came to be designated as countercultu-ral or underground magazines. Since 1978 and during the so-called Argentine transition, those magazines engaged in a dispute with those manifestations that, form the exile, equated their cultural production of those people who remained with the inaction, the stillness, and the silent. Between the exile and those who remained in the country, a solidarity network was established based on the suffering and denunciation of the military regime’s censorship, prohibition, and persecution. But also a series of tensions between “inside” and “outside”, which we intend to revisit in this paper, was established","PeriodicalId":47250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Commons","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73283745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Considering the limitations of the highly productive arable land for supporting food security in Indonesia, development and optimization degraded peatlands for agricultural expansion is an option, although this area is one of the primary sources of Green House Gas (GHG) emissions. Consequently, specific management strategies should be applied to reduce the emission and to serve future generations. Also, mitigation of climate change in the peatlands agriculture should also be given priority. This paper explores the existing farming action on climate change mitigation, and strategies of degraded peatlands management to mitigate climate change in term of reducing GHG emission. Existing condition of mitigation action by farmers in their farming systems; rice, rubber and oil palm, were reviewed through a farm household survey. Then, development strategies for climate change mitigation through sustainable degraded peatlands management were discussed through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and in-depth interview with experts from concerned research institutions and universities through morphological analysis. The finding of this research shows that farmer’s existing climate change mitigation actions pertain to land preparation, water management, and soil management in their farming system. Moreover, specific actions and strategies to mitigate climate change in the sustainable degraded peatlands management which were determined based on the most relevant variables under a given future condition consist of constructing canal blocking system, introducing technology for water and soil management, revitalizing agricultural extension institution as well as establishing fire brigade and improving farmer experience and knowledge on climate change.
{"title":"Climate Change Mitigation Through Sustainable Degraded Peatlands Management in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia","authors":"Arif Surahman, G. Shivakoti, P. Soni","doi":"10.5334/ijc.893","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.893","url":null,"abstract":"Considering the limitations of the highly productive arable land for supporting food security in Indonesia, development and optimization degraded peatlands for agricultural expansion is an option, although this area is one of the primary sources of Green House Gas (GHG) emissions. Consequently, specific management strategies should be applied to reduce the emission and to serve future generations. Also, mitigation of climate change in the peatlands agriculture should also be given priority. This paper explores the existing farming action on climate change mitigation, and strategies of degraded peatlands management to mitigate climate change in term of reducing GHG emission. Existing condition of mitigation action by farmers in their farming systems; rice, rubber and oil palm, were reviewed through a farm household survey. Then, development strategies for climate change mitigation through sustainable degraded peatlands management were discussed through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and in-depth interview with experts from concerned research institutions and universities through morphological analysis. The finding of this research shows that farmer’s existing climate change mitigation actions pertain to land preparation, water management, and soil management in their farming system. Moreover, specific actions and strategies to mitigate climate change in the sustainable degraded peatlands management which were determined based on the most relevant variables under a given future condition consist of constructing canal blocking system, introducing technology for water and soil management, revitalizing agricultural extension institution as well as establishing fire brigade and improving farmer experience and knowledge on climate change.","PeriodicalId":47250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Commons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44295213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：