Background: The aim of this study is to assess the outcome of the patients who required intensive care unit (ICU) admittance after surgical drainage of an odontogenic cervicofacial infection and identify the variables that are able to predict severe infection or a high possibility of complications.
Patients and methods: This is a retrospective cohort study including all adult patients admitted to our hospital over the period 2011-2020 due to odontogenic cervicofacial infection and required ICU admittance. The study was approved by the hospital's scientific committee (no 814-9/8/2021).
Results: 51 patients were included (mean age 43.2 years). 11.7% of the patients had major comorbidities, such as diabetes or immunosuppression. At presentation, fever was recorded in 55% patients and trismus in 92.8%, with a mean delay from symptoms to hospital admission at 3 days. 23% of patients had a post-extraction infection, 61% pericoronitis and 15% other odontogenic infections. The mean duration of hospitalization was 9.16 days whereas the mean ICU length of stay was 3.76 days. 84.3% of patients showed improvement, 13.7% deteriorated with a need of reoperation and one death was reported. ICU length of stay was associated with an 89% reduced rate when positive microbe identification was feasible, whereas rate of complications was 4-fold higher in patients with prolonged ICU length of stay.
Conclusions: Patients with deep cervicofacial odontogenic infections who require ICU management have a favourable clinical outcome. A minority of these patients will not improve in a short time frame or develop complications which require further management.
{"title":"Admittance to the intensive care unit due to acute odontogenic cervicofacial infections; a single centre retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Dimitris Tatsis, Asterios Antoniou, Alexandros Louizakis, Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos, Athanassios Kyrgidis, Konstantinos Vahtsevanos","doi":"10.1007/s10006-024-01318-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-024-01318-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the outcome of the patients who required intensive care unit (ICU) admittance after surgical drainage of an odontogenic cervicofacial infection and identify the variables that are able to predict severe infection or a high possibility of complications.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study including all adult patients admitted to our hospital over the period 2011-2020 due to odontogenic cervicofacial infection and required ICU admittance. The study was approved by the hospital's scientific committee (no 814-9/8/2021).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>51 patients were included (mean age 43.2 years). 11.7% of the patients had major comorbidities, such as diabetes or immunosuppression. At presentation, fever was recorded in 55% patients and trismus in 92.8%, with a mean delay from symptoms to hospital admission at 3 days. 23% of patients had a post-extraction infection, 61% pericoronitis and 15% other odontogenic infections. The mean duration of hospitalization was 9.16 days whereas the mean ICU length of stay was 3.76 days. 84.3% of patients showed improvement, 13.7% deteriorated with a need of reoperation and one death was reported. ICU length of stay was associated with an 89% reduced rate when positive microbe identification was feasible, whereas rate of complications was 4-fold higher in patients with prolonged ICU length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with deep cervicofacial odontogenic infections who require ICU management have a favourable clinical outcome. A minority of these patients will not improve in a short time frame or develop complications which require further management.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":"29 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142984923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: The harmony between the lips and the chin is an essential parameter in facial esthetics, and the mentolabial sulcus (MLS) represents the level of this harmony. This study aimed to assess the effect of MLS depth on facial profile attractiveness in long-face, short-face, and normal-face Iranian female individuals.
Methods: An observational study with a questionnaire was conducted, and a profile photograph of an Iranian female with class I occlusion was altered to create long-face, normal-face and short-face profiles with MLS depth ranging from 1 to 12 mm. Sixty-five lay people and 24 orthodontists rated the attractiveness of images using a 7-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed by independent t-test and Spearman's correlation coefficient using IBM SPSS Ver. 22.
Results: The ideal depth of MLS ranged from 5 to 7 mm for normal-face and short-faced and 6-8 mm for long-face Iranian females. The acceptable MLS depth was found to be up to 8 mm in normal-face and up to 10 mm in long-face and short-face females. normal-face images acquired the maximum score of attractiveness, followed by short-face images, while long-face images were the least attractive according to both observer groups. There was general agreement amongst orthodontists and lay people scoring process; however, orthodontists gave significantly higher scores for normal face images than lay people.
Conclusion: The optimal MLS depth in different facial types should be considered in treatment planning for orthognathic surgery and genioplasty.
{"title":"Ideal mentolabial sulcus depth in long-face, short-face, and normal-face in female individuals.","authors":"Marzie Mazhari, Atefe Rekabi, Nastaran Atashkar, Zahra Khayami","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01336-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01336-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The harmony between the lips and the chin is an essential parameter in facial esthetics, and the mentolabial sulcus (MLS) represents the level of this harmony. This study aimed to assess the effect of MLS depth on facial profile attractiveness in long-face, short-face, and normal-face Iranian female individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study with a questionnaire was conducted, and a profile photograph of an Iranian female with class I occlusion was altered to create long-face, normal-face and short-face profiles with MLS depth ranging from 1 to 12 mm. Sixty-five lay people and 24 orthodontists rated the attractiveness of images using a 7-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed by independent t-test and Spearman's correlation coefficient using IBM SPSS Ver. 22.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ideal depth of MLS ranged from 5 to 7 mm for normal-face and short-faced and 6-8 mm for long-face Iranian females. The acceptable MLS depth was found to be up to 8 mm in normal-face and up to 10 mm in long-face and short-face females. normal-face images acquired the maximum score of attractiveness, followed by short-face images, while long-face images were the least attractive according to both observer groups. There was general agreement amongst orthodontists and lay people scoring process; however, orthodontists gave significantly higher scores for normal face images than lay people.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The optimal MLS depth in different facial types should be considered in treatment planning for orthognathic surgery and genioplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":"29 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142980151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Bone expansion is one of the quickest, simplest, and most reliable methods of alveolar ridge augmentation for implant placement. This systematic review is designed to investigate the outcomes of the bone expansion technique for horizontal ridge augmentation.
Methods: The protocol of study has been prospectively registered into PROSPERO (CRD42023414686). Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched. Human original articles utilizing different bone expansion procedures for horizontal ridge augmentation without the use of bone materials or combined with vertical ridge augmentation techniques were included in the study. Qualitative and quantitative synthesis have been conducted. I-squared was used to assess heterogeneity. Meta-regression, forest plots random-effect model, and weighted mean difference were used for analysis. Leave-one-out influence analysis for finding outliers. Egger's publication bias test and Funnel plots were used to address publication bias.
Results: 3291 records were identified. Ten articles were included in this study after screening. The survival and complication rates of implants placed simultaneously with bone expansion was 100% 100% (95% CI: 99-100%) and 0% (95% CI: 0-1%), respectively. The meta-regression revealed that by each month passing from the implant placement the survival probability would be decreased significantly by 0.08% (95% CI: 0.009-0.15%; P = 0.03). The weighted mean ridge width difference before and after the osseodensification was 1.55 mm (95% CI: 0.92-2.17 mm).
Conclusion: Based on the study's limitations it can be concluded that the bone expansion procedure can be considered an efficient and safe method regarding the survival and complication rates of placed implants.
Trial registration number: N/A.
目的:骨扩张术是为种植体植入而进行牙槽嵴增高的最快速、最简单、最可靠的方法之一。本系统性综述旨在研究骨扩张技术用于水平牙槽嵴增量的效果:研究方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42023414686)上进行了前瞻性注册。检索了 Pubmed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库。研究纳入了利用不同的骨扩张程序进行水平牙脊增量的人类原创文章,这些程序不使用骨材料或与垂直牙脊增量技术相结合。进行了定性和定量的综合分析。采用 I 平方来评估异质性。采用元回归、森林图随机效应模型和加权平均差进行分析。为发现异常值,采用了剔除影响分析法。采用Egger发表偏倚检验和Funnel图来解决发表偏倚问题:共发现 3291 条记录。经过筛选,10 篇文章被纳入本研究。与骨扩张同时植入的种植体的存活率和并发症发生率分别为 100%(95% CI:99-100%)和 0%(95% CI:0-1%)。元回归结果显示,种植体植入后每过一个月,存活率就会显著下降 0.08% (95% CI: 0.009-0.15%; P = 0.03)。骨质增生前后的加权平均牙脊宽度差为 1.55 毫米(95% CI:0.92-2.17 毫米):基于研究的局限性,可以得出结论:就植入种植体的存活率和并发症发生率而言,骨扩张术可被视为一种高效、安全的方法:不详。
{"title":"Bone expansion as a horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ali Azadi, Parham Hazrati, Ashkan Tizno, Fatemeh Rezaei, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban, Reza Tabrizi","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01335-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01335-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bone expansion is one of the quickest, simplest, and most reliable methods of alveolar ridge augmentation for implant placement. This systematic review is designed to investigate the outcomes of the bone expansion technique for horizontal ridge augmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol of study has been prospectively registered into PROSPERO (CRD42023414686). Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched. Human original articles utilizing different bone expansion procedures for horizontal ridge augmentation without the use of bone materials or combined with vertical ridge augmentation techniques were included in the study. Qualitative and quantitative synthesis have been conducted. I-squared was used to assess heterogeneity. Meta-regression, forest plots random-effect model, and weighted mean difference were used for analysis. Leave-one-out influence analysis for finding outliers. Egger's publication bias test and Funnel plots were used to address publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3291 records were identified. Ten articles were included in this study after screening. The survival and complication rates of implants placed simultaneously with bone expansion was 100% 100% (95% CI: 99-100%) and 0% (95% CI: 0-1%), respectively. The meta-regression revealed that by each month passing from the implant placement the survival probability would be decreased significantly by 0.08% (95% CI: 0.009-0.15%; P = 0.03). The weighted mean ridge width difference before and after the osseodensification was 1.55 mm (95% CI: 0.92-2.17 mm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the study's limitations it can be concluded that the bone expansion procedure can be considered an efficient and safe method regarding the survival and complication rates of placed implants.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":"29 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142980133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: This study aimed to analyze changes in anxiety and comfort levels at each perioperative stage during third molar extraction under single-agent intravenous midazolam sedation, and to clarify how these conditions at each perioperative stage affect postoperative satisfaction.
Patients and method: 115 who requested extraction of 1 ~ 4 third molars under single-agent intravenous midazolam sedation were targeted. These patients were administered a questionnaire survey one week after surgery. The questionnaire's five items (Anxiety before surgery, Comfort during surgery, Comfort after surgery, Amnesia, and Satisfaction) were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). We investigated the correlation between each of the eight parameters which added age, operation time, and total amount of midazolam, to the VAS score. Furthermore, we compared each eight parameters according to the number of extracted wisdom teeth and sex differences.
Results: Regarding the correlation among each parameter, low preoperative anxiety were weak and positively correlated with reduced operation time reduced midazolam dosage, and an increase in postoperative comfort. All parameters influenced the patient's satisfaction level. Those levels were significantly affected by preoperative reassurance (r = 0.4402, p < 0.01), postoperative comfort (r = 0.5522, p < 0.01) amnesia (r = 0.5741, p < 0.01), and intraoperative comfort (r = 0.7578, p < 0.01). Each parameter had no significant difference depending on the number of teeth extracted. In comparison between men and women, only preoperative reassurance was significantly lower in women than in men (p<0.05).
Conclusion and relevance: This sedation effectively managed preoperative anxiety and improved postoperative satisfaction. To obtain good sedative condition, Preoperative anxiolytics are recommended. This sedation is considered particularly effective in women.
{"title":"Perioperative changes in anxiety and comfort in third molar extraction patients sedated with midazolam.","authors":"Kazuhiro Murakami, Satoshi Horita, Motokatsu Tsuyuki, Akihito Moriyasu","doi":"10.1007/s10006-024-01326-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-024-01326-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to analyze changes in anxiety and comfort levels at each perioperative stage during third molar extraction under single-agent intravenous midazolam sedation, and to clarify how these conditions at each perioperative stage affect postoperative satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Patients and method: </strong>115 who requested extraction of 1 ~ 4 third molars under single-agent intravenous midazolam sedation were targeted. These patients were administered a questionnaire survey one week after surgery. The questionnaire's five items (Anxiety before surgery, Comfort during surgery, Comfort after surgery, Amnesia, and Satisfaction) were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). We investigated the correlation between each of the eight parameters which added age, operation time, and total amount of midazolam, to the VAS score. Furthermore, we compared each eight parameters according to the number of extracted wisdom teeth and sex differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding the correlation among each parameter, low preoperative anxiety were weak and positively correlated with reduced operation time reduced midazolam dosage, and an increase in postoperative comfort. All parameters influenced the patient's satisfaction level. Those levels were significantly affected by preoperative reassurance (r = 0.4402, p < 0.01), postoperative comfort (r = 0.5522, p < 0.01) amnesia (r = 0.5741, p < 0.01), and intraoperative comfort (r = 0.7578, p < 0.01). Each parameter had no significant difference depending on the number of teeth extracted. In comparison between men and women, only preoperative reassurance was significantly lower in women than in men (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>This sedation effectively managed preoperative anxiety and improved postoperative satisfaction. To obtain good sedative condition, Preoperative anxiolytics are recommended. This sedation is considered particularly effective in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":"29 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142980157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-13DOI: 10.1007/s10006-024-01327-x
Anthony D DiPalma, Hasan Zia, Brandon Goodwin, Usmaan Al-Shehab, Anusha Bharadia, Jared Goldfarb
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the efficacy and complication rate of absorbable versus non-absorbable 3D-printed, patient-customized, maxillofacial implants in facial trauma patients.
Data sources: A comprehensive search of four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane) was conducted.
Methods: A systematic review and single-proportion meta-analysis was conducted employing PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane) yielded a total of 4087 results. After removing duplicates, 16 articles underwent full-text analysis, with 13 meeting the inclusion criteria. The inclusion focused on primary clinical data involving 3D-printed, patient-specific implants for facial bone fracture restorations. Exclusion criteria removed studies without full text, ongoing studies, animal studies, and studies not utilizing CAD/CAM for their implants.
Results: A total of 114 patients underwent insertion of 3D-printed implants. Patients receiving non-absorbable implants had a success rate of 84% (95% CI: 74-91), with complications in 12 patients. Patients receiving absorbable implants achieved a 100% success rate (95% CI: 0-100), with zero complications.
Conclusion: The study suggests absorbable 3D-printed implants provide superior results with fewer complications compared to non-absorbable 3D-printed implants for the treatment of facial fractures.
Clinical trial number: Not applicable.
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析比较了可吸收与不可吸收的3d打印患者定制颌面种植体在面部创伤患者中的疗效和并发症发生率。数据来源:综合检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane四个数据库。方法:采用PRISMA指南进行系统评价和单比例荟萃分析。对四个数据库(PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane)的全面搜索总共产生了4087个结果。删除重复后,16篇文章进行了全文分析,其中13篇符合纳入标准。纳入的主要临床数据涉及3d打印,患者特异性植入物用于面部骨折修复。排除标准排除了没有全文的研究、正在进行的研究、动物研究和未使用CAD/CAM植入物的研究。结果:114例患者接受了3d打印种植体的植入。接受不可吸收植入物的患者成功率为84% (95% CI: 74-91), 12例患者出现并发症。接受可吸收植入物的患者获得100%的成功率(95% CI: 0-100),无并发症。结论:与不可吸收的3d打印假体相比,可吸收的3d打印假体治疗面部骨折的效果更好,并发症更少。临床试验号:不适用。
{"title":"Efficacy of absorbable vs. non-absorbable patient-specific, 3D-printed implants for the treatment of facial bone fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Anthony D DiPalma, Hasan Zia, Brandon Goodwin, Usmaan Al-Shehab, Anusha Bharadia, Jared Goldfarb","doi":"10.1007/s10006-024-01327-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-024-01327-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the efficacy and complication rate of absorbable versus non-absorbable 3D-printed, patient-customized, maxillofacial implants in facial trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A comprehensive search of four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane) was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and single-proportion meta-analysis was conducted employing PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane) yielded a total of 4087 results. After removing duplicates, 16 articles underwent full-text analysis, with 13 meeting the inclusion criteria. The inclusion focused on primary clinical data involving 3D-printed, patient-specific implants for facial bone fracture restorations. Exclusion criteria removed studies without full text, ongoing studies, animal studies, and studies not utilizing CAD/CAM for their implants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 patients underwent insertion of 3D-printed implants. Patients receiving non-absorbable implants had a success rate of 84% (95% CI: 74-91), with complications in 12 patients. Patients receiving absorbable implants achieved a 100% success rate (95% CI: 0-100), with zero complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests absorbable 3D-printed implants provide superior results with fewer complications compared to non-absorbable 3D-printed implants for the treatment of facial fractures.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":"29 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142972639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-10DOI: 10.1007/s10006-025-01333-7
Natália V Bisatto, Betina B Crescente, Guilherme G Fritscher, Maria M Campos
Purpose: It has been suggested that dentofacial deformities (DFD) can impair sleep quality. This pilot study aimed at evaluating sleep disorders in individuals with DFD before orthognathic surgery, correlating the clinical findings with salivary biomarker levels.
Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled ten males and ten females with DFD diagnoses under orthodontic treatment preceding orthognathic surgery. The participants responded to the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and the Fletcher and Luckett Sleep Questionnaire (FLSQ). Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was examined by the Home Sleep Apnea Test (HSAT). The salivary levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), glutamate, and serotonin were measured.
Results: 85% of individuals presented PSQI and FLSQ scores indicative of sleep alterations. Females had higher scores in part 2 of the FLSQ instrument, referring to sleepiness-associated complaints. HSAT analysis revealed a low number of symptomatic OSA individuals, with three males demonstrating altered oxygen desaturation rates. There was a significant negative correlation between the salivary levels of serotonin and the FLSQ results.
Conclusions: Individuals with DFD diagnosis showed poorer sleep quality, which is likely independent of sex and OSA diagnosis, and negatively correlated with salivary levels of serotonin.
{"title":"Sleep disorders in individuals with dentofacial deformities: a preliminary study on the relationship with sex and serotonin levels.","authors":"Natália V Bisatto, Betina B Crescente, Guilherme G Fritscher, Maria M Campos","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01333-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10006-025-01333-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>It has been suggested that dentofacial deformities (DFD) can impair sleep quality. This pilot study aimed at evaluating sleep disorders in individuals with DFD before orthognathic surgery, correlating the clinical findings with salivary biomarker levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study enrolled ten males and ten females with DFD diagnoses under orthodontic treatment preceding orthognathic surgery. The participants responded to the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and the Fletcher and Luckett Sleep Questionnaire (FLSQ). Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was examined by the Home Sleep Apnea Test (HSAT). The salivary levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), glutamate, and serotonin were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>85% of individuals presented PSQI and FLSQ scores indicative of sleep alterations. Females had higher scores in part 2 of the FLSQ instrument, referring to sleepiness-associated complaints. HSAT analysis revealed a low number of symptomatic OSA individuals, with three males demonstrating altered oxygen desaturation rates. There was a significant negative correlation between the salivary levels of serotonin and the FLSQ results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with DFD diagnosis showed poorer sleep quality, which is likely independent of sex and OSA diagnosis, and negatively correlated with salivary levels of serotonin.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":"29 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-10DOI: 10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2
Robin Hartmann, Maximilian Weiherer, Felix Nieberle, Christoph Palm, Vanessa Brébant, Lukas Prantl, Philipp Lamby, Torsten E Reichert, Jürgen Taxis, Tobias Ettl
Purpose: This study aimed to clarify the applicability of smartphone-based three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging for clinical use in oral and maxillofacial surgery, comparing two smartphone-based approaches to the gold standard.
Methods: Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 (Canfield Scientific, USA), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro (Apple Inc., USA), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry. Smartphone-based SMs were superimposed onto Vectra-based SMs. Linear measurements and volumetric evaluations were performed to evaluate surface-to-surface deviation. To assess inter-observer reliability, all measurements were performed independently by a second observer. Statistical analyses included Bland-Altman analyses, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired samples, and Intraclass correlation coefficients.
Results: Photogrammetry-based SMs exhibited an overall landmark-to-landmark deviation of M = 0.8 mm (SD = ± 0.58 mm, n = 450), while TrueDepth-based SMs displayed a deviation of M = 1.1 mm (SD = ± 0.72 mm, n = 450). The mean volumetric difference for photogrammetry-based SMs was M = 1.8 cc (SD = ± 2.12 cc, n = 90), and M = 3.1 cc (SD = ± 2.64 cc, n = 90) for TrueDepth-based SMs. When comparing the two approaches, most landmark-to-landmark measurements demonstrated 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA) of ≤ 2 mm. Volumetric measurements revealed LoA > 2 cc. Photogrammetry-based measurements demonstrated higher inter-observer reliability for overall landmark-to-landmark deviation.
Conclusion: Both approaches for smartphone-based 3D surface imaging exhibit potential in capturing the face. Photogrammetry-based SMs demonstrated superior alignment and volumetric accuracy with Vectra-based SMs than TrueDepth-based SMs.
目的:本研究旨在阐明基于智能手机的三维(3D)表面成像在口腔颌面外科临床应用中的适用性,并将两种基于智能手机的方法与金标准进行比较。方法:使用Vectra M5 (Canfield Scientific, USA)、iPhone 14 Pro的TrueDepth相机(Apple Inc., USA)和带有摄影测量的iPhone 14 Pro,对30名志愿者(15男15女)进行面部表面模型(SMs)生成。基于智能手机的短信被叠加到基于vectra的短信上。进行了线性测量和体积评估,以评估表面到表面的偏差。为了评估观察者之间的可靠性,所有的测量都是由第二个观察者独立进行的。统计分析包括Bland-Altman分析、配对样本的Wilcoxon sign -rank检验和类内相关系数。结果:基于摄影测量的SMs显示的总体地标到地标偏差为M = 0.8 mm (SD =±0.58 mm, n = 450),而基于truedepth的SMs显示的偏差为M = 1.1 mm (SD =±0.72 mm, n = 450)。基于摄影测量的SMs的平均体积差为M = 1.8 cc (SD =±2.12 cc, n = 90),基于truedepth的SMs的平均体积差为M = 3.1 cc (SD =±2.64 cc, n = 90)。当比较两种方法时,大多数地标到地标的测量结果显示95%的Bland-Altman一致限(LoA)≤2 mm。基于摄影测量的测量结果显示,总体地标到地标偏差的观察者间可靠性更高。结论:两种基于智能手机的三维表面成像方法都具有捕获人脸的潜力。基于摄影测量的短信显示出优越的对齐和体积精度与基于vectra的短信比基于truedepth的短信。
{"title":"Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5.","authors":"Robin Hartmann, Maximilian Weiherer, Felix Nieberle, Christoph Palm, Vanessa Brébant, Lukas Prantl, Philipp Lamby, Torsten E Reichert, Jürgen Taxis, Tobias Ettl","doi":"10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to clarify the applicability of smartphone-based three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging for clinical use in oral and maxillofacial surgery, comparing two smartphone-based approaches to the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 (Canfield Scientific, USA), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro (Apple Inc., USA), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry. Smartphone-based SMs were superimposed onto Vectra-based SMs. Linear measurements and volumetric evaluations were performed to evaluate surface-to-surface deviation. To assess inter-observer reliability, all measurements were performed independently by a second observer. Statistical analyses included Bland-Altman analyses, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired samples, and Intraclass correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Photogrammetry-based SMs exhibited an overall landmark-to-landmark deviation of M = 0.8 mm (SD = ± 0.58 mm, n = 450), while TrueDepth-based SMs displayed a deviation of M = 1.1 mm (SD = ± 0.72 mm, n = 450). The mean volumetric difference for photogrammetry-based SMs was M = 1.8 cc (SD = ± 2.12 cc, n = 90), and M = 3.1 cc (SD = ± 2.64 cc, n = 90) for TrueDepth-based SMs. When comparing the two approaches, most landmark-to-landmark measurements demonstrated 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA) of ≤ 2 mm. Volumetric measurements revealed LoA > 2 cc. Photogrammetry-based measurements demonstrated higher inter-observer reliability for overall landmark-to-landmark deviation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both approaches for smartphone-based 3D surface imaging exhibit potential in capturing the face. Photogrammetry-based SMs demonstrated superior alignment and volumetric accuracy with Vectra-based SMs than TrueDepth-based SMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":"29 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723895/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-09DOI: 10.1007/s10006-024-01316-0
Ahmed Elkoumi, Omar Elkoumi, Mohamed Hamouda Elkasaby, Huzifa Khitiy, Mariam Khaled Elbairy, Ahmed Tawfik, Omar K Habib, Abeer Shaalan
Background: The primary objective of this study was to assess the benefit of cancer-directed surgery (CDS) on both overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with malignant major salivary gland cancers (MMSGCs). The secondary objective was to explore the benefits of adjuvant therapy on the survival outcomes of these patients.
Methods: Patients diagnosed with MMSGC were extracted from the SEER database and subsequently categorized into two cohorts: CDS and non-CDS. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mitigate confounding variables. The survival benefit associated with CDS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard models. Furthermore, the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy was explored within the CDS subgroup.
Results: A total of 7,029 patients with MMSGC were included. PSM was performed and resulted in a matched cohort between both groups, including 595 patients in each group. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard indicated that patients who received CDS had better OS (HR: 0.45, 95% CI [0.39 to 0.52], P < 0.001) and CSS (HR: 0.46, 95% CI [0.40 to 0.52], P < 0.001). The 5- and 10-year OS for the CDS group was 42% (95% CI, 38 - 46%), and 25% (95% CI, 21 - 29%) consecutively, while the 5- and 10-year OS for the non-CDS group was 20% (95% CI, 17 - 24%), and 12% (95% CI, 9.7 - 16%) consecutively. Moreover, patients with younger age, localized tumors, and lower TNM stage could benefit more from CDS. Radiotherapy as adjuvant therapy was found to be beneficial (HR: 0.69, 95% CI [0.55-0.85], p < 0.001), while chemotherapy could not significantly benefit these patients.
Conclusion: CDS improved the OS and CSS survival in MMSGC patients. Specific patient subgroups seemed to have a superior benefit from CDS. Adjuvant radiotherapy could help enhance the survival outcomes of these patients while chemotherapy could not.
背景:本研究的主要目的是评估癌症定向手术(CDS)对恶性大涎腺癌(MMSGCs)患者总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)的益处。次要目的是探讨辅助治疗对这些患者生存结果的益处。方法:从SEER数据库中提取诊断为MMSGC的患者,随后将其分为两组:CDS和非CDS。倾向得分匹配(PSM)用于减轻混杂变量。使用Kaplan-Meier分析、log-rank检验和Cox比例风险模型评估与CDS相关的生存获益。此外,在CDS亚组中探讨了辅助放疗和化疗的影响。结果:共纳入7029例MMSGC患者。进行PSM并在两组之间形成匹配的队列,每组包括595名患者。多变量Cox比例风险提示,接受CDS的患者有更好的OS (HR: 0.45, 95% CI [0.39 ~ 0.52]), P结论:CDS改善了MMSGC患者的OS和CSS生存。特定的患者亚组似乎从CDS中获益更大。辅助放疗可以提高这些患者的生存结果,而化疗则不能。
{"title":"Survival benefit of cancer-directed surgery and the role of adjuvant therapy in malignant major salivary gland cancers: a propensity score matched retrospective analysis.","authors":"Ahmed Elkoumi, Omar Elkoumi, Mohamed Hamouda Elkasaby, Huzifa Khitiy, Mariam Khaled Elbairy, Ahmed Tawfik, Omar K Habib, Abeer Shaalan","doi":"10.1007/s10006-024-01316-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-024-01316-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to assess the benefit of cancer-directed surgery (CDS) on both overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with malignant major salivary gland cancers (MMSGCs). The secondary objective was to explore the benefits of adjuvant therapy on the survival outcomes of these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with MMSGC were extracted from the SEER database and subsequently categorized into two cohorts: CDS and non-CDS. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mitigate confounding variables. The survival benefit associated with CDS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard models. Furthermore, the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy was explored within the CDS subgroup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7,029 patients with MMSGC were included. PSM was performed and resulted in a matched cohort between both groups, including 595 patients in each group. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard indicated that patients who received CDS had better OS (HR: 0.45, 95% CI [0.39 to 0.52], P < 0.001) and CSS (HR: 0.46, 95% CI [0.40 to 0.52], P < 0.001). The 5- and 10-year OS for the CDS group was 42% (95% CI, 38 - 46%), and 25% (95% CI, 21 - 29%) consecutively, while the 5- and 10-year OS for the non-CDS group was 20% (95% CI, 17 - 24%), and 12% (95% CI, 9.7 - 16%) consecutively. Moreover, patients with younger age, localized tumors, and lower TNM stage could benefit more from CDS. Radiotherapy as adjuvant therapy was found to be beneficial (HR: 0.69, 95% CI [0.55-0.85], p < 0.001), while chemotherapy could not significantly benefit these patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CDS improved the OS and CSS survival in MMSGC patients. Specific patient subgroups seemed to have a superior benefit from CDS. Adjuvant radiotherapy could help enhance the survival outcomes of these patients while chemotherapy could not.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":"29 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Current scapular free flap (SFF) harvest in mandibular reconstruction often requires repositioning, hindering simultaneous harvest and resection and potentially increasing ischemic time. This study evaluated the efficacy of the pull-through technique (PTT) for SFF harvest, aiming to reduce ischemic time during mandibular segmental resection.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 24 patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction using SFF at two maxillofacial surgery departments between January 2015 and May 2022. In total, 13 patients received PTT, while the remaining 11 underwent non-PTT. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including age, sex, diagnosis, resected mandibular segments, operative time, and ischemic time. Statistical analysis was performed to compare these variables between the PTT and non-PTT groups.
Results: The study found no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, diagnosis, number of resected segments, or total operative time. However, ischemic time was significantly shorter in the PTT group than in the non-PTT group. PTT also allowed for minimal position changes during surgery compared with non-PTT.
Conclusion: Our study investigated the impact of the PTT on SFF reconstruction during mandibular segmental resection. We found that utilizing PTT-SFF significantly reduced ischemic time compared with the traditional method. This technique offers a potential advantage by facilitating stable blood flow visualization and potentially improving flap viability.
{"title":"Reduction of ischemic time using the pull-through technique for scapular free flap.","authors":"Yoshio Ohyama, Kazuki Hasegawa, Narikazu Uzawa, Tomokazu Sawada, Michio Sano, Masashi Yamashiro, Yasuyuki Michi, Yoshinori Inaba, Kunihiro Myo, Takuya Iwasaki, Masahiko Terauchi, Tetsuya Yoda","doi":"10.1007/s10006-024-01323-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-024-01323-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Current scapular free flap (SFF) harvest in mandibular reconstruction often requires repositioning, hindering simultaneous harvest and resection and potentially increasing ischemic time. This study evaluated the efficacy of the pull-through technique (PTT) for SFF harvest, aiming to reduce ischemic time during mandibular segmental resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 24 patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction using SFF at two maxillofacial surgery departments between January 2015 and May 2022. In total, 13 patients received PTT, while the remaining 11 underwent non-PTT. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including age, sex, diagnosis, resected mandibular segments, operative time, and ischemic time. Statistical analysis was performed to compare these variables between the PTT and non-PTT groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, diagnosis, number of resected segments, or total operative time. However, ischemic time was significantly shorter in the PTT group than in the non-PTT group. PTT also allowed for minimal position changes during surgery compared with non-PTT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study investigated the impact of the PTT on SFF reconstruction during mandibular segmental resection. We found that utilizing PTT-SFF significantly reduced ischemic time compared with the traditional method. This technique offers a potential advantage by facilitating stable blood flow visualization and potentially improving flap viability.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":"29 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-09DOI: 10.1007/s10006-025-01332-8
Aashita Jain, D S Gupta, Nandakishore Donepudi, Saubhagya S Agrawal, Deepika Saini, Pooja Bijarniya
Background: It has been outlined that LTM (Lower third molar) extracted from patients in which grinding, cleaning, sterilization & demineralization prove to be highly effective as graft material for filling the alveolar socket of the very same patient. These investigations aim to assess the efficiency of ADDM (Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Matrix) graft in third molar extraction sockets.
Purpose: To check the effectiveness of ADDM as graft material in extraction socket by evaluating pain, swelling, trismus, PD (Probing Depth) and bone density.
Study design, setting, sample: A prospective, randomized control trial was conducted at our institute. The patients were haphazardly, non-blindly alienated into two groups. Group A (45 patients) on the test side after LTM impaction surgery will receive ADDM graft material with bio-collagen membrane and Group B (45 patients) on the control side underwent LTM removal, with the alveolus left to heal conventionally by forming a blood clot.
Results: Swelling showed significant difference between CG (Control Group) and TG (Test Group), the intergroup comparison of change in the swelling scores at seventh post-operative day (from pre-op level) was significantly higher in the TG (117.35) as compared to the CGs (115.92) (p = 0.001). A statistically significant difference in probing depth was also noted between the two groups, CG 4.46 ± 1.252 & TG 2.52 ± 0.641 in the post-operative examination at three months. In our study radiographical evaluation revealed progressive increase in bone density in TG (135.81 ± 8.73) when compared to CG (121.59 ± 13.83) over a period of three months. Pain and trismus evaluation did not reveal any significant difference between TG & CG.
Conclusion: The clinical results of the ADDM graft procedure demonstrate satisfactory outcomes in extraction sockets. The findings of this study highlight the importance of preservation methods in maintaining the periodontal pocket depth distal to the second molar and the remaining alveolar ridge following extraction.
{"title":"Is ADDM graft practical? A comparative study to evaluate ADDM graft in third molar surgery.","authors":"Aashita Jain, D S Gupta, Nandakishore Donepudi, Saubhagya S Agrawal, Deepika Saini, Pooja Bijarniya","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01332-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10006-025-01332-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has been outlined that LTM (Lower third molar) extracted from patients in which grinding, cleaning, sterilization & demineralization prove to be highly effective as graft material for filling the alveolar socket of the very same patient. These investigations aim to assess the efficiency of ADDM (Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Matrix) graft in third molar extraction sockets.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To check the effectiveness of ADDM as graft material in extraction socket by evaluating pain, swelling, trismus, PD (Probing Depth) and bone density.</p><p><strong>Study design, setting, sample: </strong>A prospective, randomized control trial was conducted at our institute. The patients were haphazardly, non-blindly alienated into two groups. Group A (45 patients) on the test side after LTM impaction surgery will receive ADDM graft material with bio-collagen membrane and Group B (45 patients) on the control side underwent LTM removal, with the alveolus left to heal conventionally by forming a blood clot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Swelling showed significant difference between CG (Control Group) and TG (Test Group), the intergroup comparison of change in the swelling scores at seventh post-operative day (from pre-op level) was significantly higher in the TG (117.35) as compared to the CGs (115.92) (p = 0.001). A statistically significant difference in probing depth was also noted between the two groups, CG 4.46 ± 1.252 & TG 2.52 ± 0.641 in the post-operative examination at three months. In our study radiographical evaluation revealed progressive increase in bone density in TG (135.81 ± 8.73) when compared to CG (121.59 ± 13.83) over a period of three months. Pain and trismus evaluation did not reveal any significant difference between TG & CG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical results of the ADDM graft procedure demonstrate satisfactory outcomes in extraction sockets. The findings of this study highlight the importance of preservation methods in maintaining the periodontal pocket depth distal to the second molar and the remaining alveolar ridge following extraction.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":"29 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}