Pub Date : 2021-06-01Epub Date: 2020-09-04DOI: 10.1177/1053815120953484
Kalli B Decker, Jacie Meldrum, J Mitchell Vaterlaus, Tricia D Foster
The Division for Early Childhood (DEC) clearly outlined recommended practices for the provision of Part C services. However, there may be challenges in rural areas associated with services aligning with these recommended practices. Therefore, this study focuses on how families experience Part C services and the extent to which services align with specific areas the DEC recommended practices in the large, rural state of Montana. We interviewed parents (N = 30) about their children's Part C services. Deductive qualitative content analysis was used. Parents' reports suggest that while some aspects of their Part C services align with specific recommended practices, others do not. There were some meaningful differences regarding alignment with these recommended practices depending on type of provider being described. The environments in which services take place are discussed, as these may influence aspects of collaboration and building family capacity.
{"title":"Parents' Part C Experiences in Rural Areas: Alignment With Recommended Practices.","authors":"Kalli B Decker, Jacie Meldrum, J Mitchell Vaterlaus, Tricia D Foster","doi":"10.1177/1053815120953484","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815120953484","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Division for Early Childhood (DEC) clearly outlined recommended practices for the provision of Part C services. However, there may be challenges in rural areas associated with services aligning with these recommended practices. Therefore, this study focuses on how families experience Part C services and the extent to which services align with specific areas the DEC recommended practices in the large, rural state of Montana. We interviewed parents (<i>N</i> = 30) about their children's Part C services. Deductive qualitative content analysis was used. Parents' reports suggest that while some aspects of their Part C services align with specific recommended practices, others do not. There were some meaningful differences regarding alignment with these recommended practices depending on type of provider being described. The environments in which services take place are discussed, as these may influence aspects of collaboration and building family capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Intervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1053815120953484","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39258140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-20DOI: 10.1177/10538151211012779
Shreya Roy, Olivia J. Lindly, M. Berardinelli, Alison J. Martin
Communication between a child’s health care provider, child care and other community providers (cross-system communication) may facilitate access and referral to early intervention (EI). This study examined (a) factors associated with cross-system communication and (b) whether cross-system communication was associated with receiving EI among U.S. toddlers ages 1 to 2 years. This study used data from the National Survey of Children’s Health 2016 and included 1,184 children of ages 1 to 2 years, whose parents indicated a need for cross-system communication. Dependent variable was having an EI plan. Primary independent variable was cross-system communication. Children who had cross-system communication had almost three times (2.9) higher odds of receiving EI services as compared to those who did not have cross-system communication (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2, 6.9, p = .014). This study found that cross-system communication was associated with receiving EI services for U.S. children of ages 1 to 2 years.
儿童卫生保健提供者、儿童保健和其他社区提供者之间的沟通(跨系统沟通)可以促进早期干预(EI)的获取和转诊。本研究考察了(a)与跨系统沟通相关的因素，以及(b)跨系统沟通是否与美国1至2岁幼儿接受情商有关。这项研究使用了2016年全国儿童健康调查的数据，包括1184名1至2岁的儿童，他们的父母表示需要跨系统沟通。因变量是是否有EI计划。主要的自变量是跨系统通信。与没有进行跨系统交流的儿童相比，进行过跨系统交流的儿童接受EI服务的几率几乎高出3倍(2.9)(优势比[OR] = 2.9, 95%可信区间[CI] = 1.2, 6.9, p = 0.014)。本研究发现，跨系统沟通与美国1至2岁儿童接受EI服务有关。
{"title":"Cross-System Communication in Early Childhood Settings in the United States: An Exploratory Study Using the National Survey of Children’s Health","authors":"Shreya Roy, Olivia J. Lindly, M. Berardinelli, Alison J. Martin","doi":"10.1177/10538151211012779","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538151211012779","url":null,"abstract":"Communication between a child’s health care provider, child care and other community providers (cross-system communication) may facilitate access and referral to early intervention (EI). This study examined (a) factors associated with cross-system communication and (b) whether cross-system communication was associated with receiving EI among U.S. toddlers ages 1 to 2 years. This study used data from the National Survey of Children’s Health 2016 and included 1,184 children of ages 1 to 2 years, whose parents indicated a need for cross-system communication. Dependent variable was having an EI plan. Primary independent variable was cross-system communication. Children who had cross-system communication had almost three times (2.9) higher odds of receiving EI services as compared to those who did not have cross-system communication (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2, 6.9, p = .014). This study found that cross-system communication was associated with receiving EI services for U.S. children of ages 1 to 2 years.","PeriodicalId":47360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Intervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10538151211012779","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48172695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-11DOI: 10.1177/10538151211012703
Lidia Huerta, Lauren M. Cycyk, Hannah Sanford-Keller, A. Busch, Jill K. Dolata, Heather W. Moore, Stephanie De Anda, K. Zuckerman
A retrospective review of initial early intervention and early childhood special education (EI/ECSE) evaluation reports was completed to identify practices specific to the evaluation of Latinx children’s communication development. A records abstraction approach employed entailed a random selection of 294 EI/ECSE evaluation reports completed in Oregon with Latinx children with communication concerns. The reports were coded for documentation of background information, evaluation procedures, and eligibility decisions. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were completed to identify common evaluation practices. Adequate evaluation practices documented included the use of a multidisciplinary evaluation team, administration of multiple evaluation measures, and provision of basic information on children’s language background. EI/ECSE providers did not consistently specify children’s language exposure/use, denote the language of the evaluation, prioritize appropriate assessment measures, and indicate attention to cultural and linguistic differences when determining eligibility. Recommendations for decreasing bias in the evaluation of Latinx children and culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) populations more broadly are offered.
{"title":"A Retrospective Review of Communication Evaluation Practices of Young Latinx Children","authors":"Lidia Huerta, Lauren M. Cycyk, Hannah Sanford-Keller, A. Busch, Jill K. Dolata, Heather W. Moore, Stephanie De Anda, K. Zuckerman","doi":"10.1177/10538151211012703","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538151211012703","url":null,"abstract":"A retrospective review of initial early intervention and early childhood special education (EI/ECSE) evaluation reports was completed to identify practices specific to the evaluation of Latinx children’s communication development. A records abstraction approach employed entailed a random selection of 294 EI/ECSE evaluation reports completed in Oregon with Latinx children with communication concerns. The reports were coded for documentation of background information, evaluation procedures, and eligibility decisions. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were completed to identify common evaluation practices. Adequate evaluation practices documented included the use of a multidisciplinary evaluation team, administration of multiple evaluation measures, and provision of basic information on children’s language background. EI/ECSE providers did not consistently specify children’s language exposure/use, denote the language of the evaluation, prioritize appropriate assessment measures, and indicate attention to cultural and linguistic differences when determining eligibility. Recommendations for decreasing bias in the evaluation of Latinx children and culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) populations more broadly are offered.","PeriodicalId":47360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Intervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10538151211012703","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49219653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-21DOI: 10.1177/10538151211009306
Heather Coleman, K. Hume, L. Fanning, Samantha Scott
Many autism-focused early intervention (EI) models have not yet been adopted by community-based providers in rural settings due to fit and feasibility when working within the Part C model. Family Implemented TEACCH for Toddlers (FITT, based on the University of North Carolina TEACCH Autism Program) is a research-based, Part-C compatible, EI model incorporating parent-coaching and naturalistic strategies with early evidence of efficacy in rural communities. Its use by rural community providers has not yet been examined. Thus, in this multiple baseline study, rural EI professionals (n = 3) working with caregivers and their toddlers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) were provided training and weekly coaching on the use of the FITT model and parent-coaching strategies. The implementation of FITT and parent-coaching strategies were measured, and social validity information was gathered from participants. Results indicate that FITT is both feasible to implement, as demonstrated by provider implementation, and acceptable to both EI providers and caregivers.
{"title":"Examining the Feasibility and Fit of Family Implemented TEACCH for Toddlers in Rural Settings","authors":"Heather Coleman, K. Hume, L. Fanning, Samantha Scott","doi":"10.1177/10538151211009306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538151211009306","url":null,"abstract":"Many autism-focused early intervention (EI) models have not yet been adopted by community-based providers in rural settings due to fit and feasibility when working within the Part C model. Family Implemented TEACCH for Toddlers (FITT, based on the University of North Carolina TEACCH Autism Program) is a research-based, Part-C compatible, EI model incorporating parent-coaching and naturalistic strategies with early evidence of efficacy in rural communities. Its use by rural community providers has not yet been examined. Thus, in this multiple baseline study, rural EI professionals (n = 3) working with caregivers and their toddlers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) were provided training and weekly coaching on the use of the FITT model and parent-coaching strategies. The implementation of FITT and parent-coaching strategies were measured, and social validity information was gathered from participants. Results indicate that FITT is both feasible to implement, as demonstrated by provider implementation, and acceptable to both EI providers and caregivers.","PeriodicalId":47360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Intervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10538151211009306","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48905082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-03-10DOI: 10.1177/1053815121998434
Kizzy Albritton, Adrienne Stuckey, Nicole Patton Terry
Three-year-old children are seldom the focus in studies about supplemental early literacy instructional support. This study examines 3-year-old children’s potential need for additional early literacy support, extending and replicating a previous investigation that identified prekindergarten children (i.e., 4-year-olds) in Head Start classrooms for additional tiers of early literacy support. The sample included 143 children from Head Start centers in a southeastern, urban region of the United States who had received both fall and spring administrations of an early literacy screener (i.e., Get Ready to Read! —Revised). Standard scores were used to classify children into three tiers, and child tier movement from fall to spring was analyzed. Results support the feasibility of a tiered approach for examining 3-year-old children’s early literacy instructional needs. This might allow researchers and practitioners to provide intervention to children much sooner, thereby increasing the potential for positive long-term reading outcomes.
{"title":"Multitiered Early Literacy Identification in 3-Year-Old Children in Head Start Settings","authors":"Kizzy Albritton, Adrienne Stuckey, Nicole Patton Terry","doi":"10.1177/1053815121998434","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815121998434","url":null,"abstract":"Three-year-old children are seldom the focus in studies about supplemental early literacy instructional support. This study examines 3-year-old children’s potential need for additional early literacy support, extending and replicating a previous investigation that identified prekindergarten children (i.e., 4-year-olds) in Head Start classrooms for additional tiers of early literacy support. The sample included 143 children from Head Start centers in a southeastern, urban region of the United States who had received both fall and spring administrations of an early literacy screener (i.e., Get Ready to Read! —Revised). Standard scores were used to classify children into three tiers, and child tier movement from fall to spring was analyzed. Results support the feasibility of a tiered approach for examining 3-year-old children’s early literacy instructional needs. This might allow researchers and practitioners to provide intervention to children much sooner, thereby increasing the potential for positive long-term reading outcomes.","PeriodicalId":47360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Intervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1053815121998434","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47513476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-02-25DOI: 10.1177/1053815121995578
J. Buzhardt, A. Wallisch, Dwight W. Irvin, B. Boyd, Brenda Salley, Fan Jia
One of the earliest indicators of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is delay in language and social communication. Despite consensus on the benefits of earlier diagnosis and intervention, our understanding of the language growth of children with ASD during the first years of life remains limited. Therefore, this study compared communication growth patterns of infants and toddlers with ASD to growth benchmarks of a standardized language assessment. We conducted a retrospective analysis of growth on the Early Communication Indicator (ECI) of 23 infants and toddlers who received an ASD diagnosis in the future. At 42 months of age, children with ASD had significantly lower rates of gestures, single words, and multiple words, but significantly higher rates of nonword vocalizations. Children with ASD had significantly slower growth of single and multiple words, but their rate of vocalization growth was significantly greater than benchmark. Although more research is needed with larger samples, because the ECI was designed for practitioners to monitor children’s response to intervention over time, these findings show promise for the ECI’s use as a progress monitoring measure for young children with ASD. Limitations and the need for future research are discussed.
{"title":"Exploring Growth in Expressive Communication of Infants and Toddlers With Autism Spectrum Disorder","authors":"J. Buzhardt, A. Wallisch, Dwight W. Irvin, B. Boyd, Brenda Salley, Fan Jia","doi":"10.1177/1053815121995578","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815121995578","url":null,"abstract":"One of the earliest indicators of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is delay in language and social communication. Despite consensus on the benefits of earlier diagnosis and intervention, our understanding of the language growth of children with ASD during the first years of life remains limited. Therefore, this study compared communication growth patterns of infants and toddlers with ASD to growth benchmarks of a standardized language assessment. We conducted a retrospective analysis of growth on the Early Communication Indicator (ECI) of 23 infants and toddlers who received an ASD diagnosis in the future. At 42 months of age, children with ASD had significantly lower rates of gestures, single words, and multiple words, but significantly higher rates of nonword vocalizations. Children with ASD had significantly slower growth of single and multiple words, but their rate of vocalization growth was significantly greater than benchmark. Although more research is needed with larger samples, because the ECI was designed for practitioners to monitor children’s response to intervention over time, these findings show promise for the ECI’s use as a progress monitoring measure for young children with ASD. Limitations and the need for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Intervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1053815121995578","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44074454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-02-19DOI: 10.1177/1053815121993570
Hsiu-wen Yang, H. Meadan, M. Ostrosky
Children with disabilities often experience gross motor delays. Adults, including parents, can play a crucial role in supporting children’s motor development. However, a limited number of research studies have focused on building parents’ capacity to support their young children’s motor skill development. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a training and coaching program on parent implementation of prompting procedures and children’s gross motor skills. A multiple-probe single-case design across three parent–child dyads was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. The findings show that parents learned how to implement prompting procedures with high fidelity. In addition, the parents reported improvements in their children’s gross motor performance.
{"title":"A Parent-Implemented Gross Motor Intervention for Young Children with Disabilities","authors":"Hsiu-wen Yang, H. Meadan, M. Ostrosky","doi":"10.1177/1053815121993570","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815121993570","url":null,"abstract":"Children with disabilities often experience gross motor delays. Adults, including parents, can play a crucial role in supporting children’s motor development. However, a limited number of research studies have focused on building parents’ capacity to support their young children’s motor skill development. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a training and coaching program on parent implementation of prompting procedures and children’s gross motor skills. A multiple-probe single-case design across three parent–child dyads was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. The findings show that parents learned how to implement prompting procedures with high fidelity. In addition, the parents reported improvements in their children’s gross motor performance.","PeriodicalId":47360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Intervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1053815121993570","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49657127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-02-19DOI: 10.1177/1053815121991928
A. Lavallée, Gwenaëlle De Clifford-Faugère, A. Ballard, M. Aita
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of parent–infant interventions for parents of preterm infants on parental sensitivity compared to standard care or active comparators. This review follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration ID: CRD42016047083). Database searches were performed from inception to 2020 to identify eligible randomized controlled trials. Two review authors independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool and quality of evidence using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. A total of 19 studies (n = 2,111 participants) were included and 14 were suitable to be pooled in our primary outcome meta-analysis. Results show no significant effect of parent–infant interventions over standard care or basic educational programs, on parental sensitivity. Results may not necessarily be due to the ineffectiveness of the interventions but rather due to implementation failure or high risk of bias of included studies.
{"title":"Parent–Infant Interventions to Promote Parental Sensitivity During NICU Hospitalization: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"A. Lavallée, Gwenaëlle De Clifford-Faugère, A. Ballard, M. Aita","doi":"10.1177/1053815121991928","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815121991928","url":null,"abstract":"This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of parent–infant interventions for parents of preterm infants on parental sensitivity compared to standard care or active comparators. This review follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration ID: CRD42016047083). Database searches were performed from inception to 2020 to identify eligible randomized controlled trials. Two review authors independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool and quality of evidence using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. A total of 19 studies (n = 2,111 participants) were included and 14 were suitable to be pooled in our primary outcome meta-analysis. Results show no significant effect of parent–infant interventions over standard care or basic educational programs, on parental sensitivity. Results may not necessarily be due to the ineffectiveness of the interventions but rather due to implementation failure or high risk of bias of included studies.","PeriodicalId":47360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Intervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1053815121991928","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42490859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-02-12DOI: 10.1177/1053815121992132
Ciera M. Lorio, Juliann Woods, Patricia A. Snyder
This descriptive study included a systematic examination of provider and caregiver reflective conversations during caregiver coaching sessions focused on embedded intervention. Transcribed videos from 31 provider–caregiver dyads in two groups (Embedded Practices and Interventions with Caregivers [EPIC] vs. business-as-usual [BAU]) were used for data collection, resulting in a total of 93 transcripts across three different time points. Using methods of directed content analysis, a coding scheme describing various components of shared reflection was developed and used to code transcripts. Coding data were used to explore the rate per minute and relative frequency of types, topics, and spontaneity of reflection. Although there were no statistically significant differences in the frequency and rate of reflective versus nonreflective conversational turns, there were group differences in the reflective topics and specific types of reflective comments and questions posed by participants. Results from this study and others can help the field further define reflection as a coaching strategy and consider the potential utility of different reflective comment and question types to increase caregiver capacity to embed interventions in home routines. Further research is recommended to explicate further definitions and processes for reflection specific to caregiver coaching, including methods used to code reflective conversations and evaluate how reflection impacts caregivers’ intervention implementation.
{"title":"An Exploration of Reflective Conversations in Early Intervention Caregiver Coaching Sessions","authors":"Ciera M. Lorio, Juliann Woods, Patricia A. Snyder","doi":"10.1177/1053815121992132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815121992132","url":null,"abstract":"This descriptive study included a systematic examination of provider and caregiver reflective conversations during caregiver coaching sessions focused on embedded intervention. Transcribed videos from 31 provider–caregiver dyads in two groups (Embedded Practices and Interventions with Caregivers [EPIC] vs. business-as-usual [BAU]) were used for data collection, resulting in a total of 93 transcripts across three different time points. Using methods of directed content analysis, a coding scheme describing various components of shared reflection was developed and used to code transcripts. Coding data were used to explore the rate per minute and relative frequency of types, topics, and spontaneity of reflection. Although there were no statistically significant differences in the frequency and rate of reflective versus nonreflective conversational turns, there were group differences in the reflective topics and specific types of reflective comments and questions posed by participants. Results from this study and others can help the field further define reflection as a coaching strategy and consider the potential utility of different reflective comment and question types to increase caregiver capacity to embed interventions in home routines. Further research is recommended to explicate further definitions and processes for reflection specific to caregiver coaching, including methods used to code reflective conversations and evaluate how reflection impacts caregivers’ intervention implementation.","PeriodicalId":47360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Intervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1053815121992132","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47597263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-02-10DOI: 10.1177/1053815121993225
Adrienne K. Golden, M. Hemmeter, Marisa Edmonds, Jennifer R. Ledford
A multiple probe design across behaviors, replicated across teaching teams, was used to evaluate the effectiveness of training plus reciprocal peer coaching on teaching teams’ implementation of Pyramid Model (PM) practices. In this study, teaching teams (three dyads and one triad) were provided with training around the use of targeted PM practices and reciprocal peer coaching. Coaching required teachers within each team to observe and provide feedback to one another around their use of targeted PM practices. Data from this study indicate reciprocal peer coaching is an effective and efficient way for early childhood teaching teams to increase their use of PM practices. Increased use of PM practices generalized across classroom activities and maintained following the removal of peer coaching. Results, limitations, impacts on the field, and next steps are discussed.
{"title":"Reciprocal Peer Coaching and Teaching Teams’ Use of Pyramid Model Practices","authors":"Adrienne K. Golden, M. Hemmeter, Marisa Edmonds, Jennifer R. Ledford","doi":"10.1177/1053815121993225","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815121993225","url":null,"abstract":"A multiple probe design across behaviors, replicated across teaching teams, was used to evaluate the effectiveness of training plus reciprocal peer coaching on teaching teams’ implementation of Pyramid Model (PM) practices. In this study, teaching teams (three dyads and one triad) were provided with training around the use of targeted PM practices and reciprocal peer coaching. Coaching required teachers within each team to observe and provide feedback to one another around their use of targeted PM practices. Data from this study indicate reciprocal peer coaching is an effective and efficient way for early childhood teaching teams to increase their use of PM practices. Increased use of PM practices generalized across classroom activities and maintained following the removal of peer coaching. Results, limitations, impacts on the field, and next steps are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Intervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1053815121993225","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65599891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号