Pub Date : 2024-04-17DOI: 10.1007/s11024-024-09528-0
Göran Sundqvist, Sebastian Linke
This article compares two science advisory organizations: the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and the International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES), with a special focus on how their respective policy systems absorb the knowledge delivered for use in decision processes. The science-policy processes of these two organizations differ in important respects; ICES delivers highly specified knowledge to a specified uptake mechanism, while the IPCC produces unspecified knowledge for an unspecified uptake mechanism. Since both environmental governance areas are criticized for lack of needed action, a comparison is of interest asking how this might relate to the organization of science advice. As theoretical resources for this explorative comparison we utilize two approaches from the field of science and technology studies: the co-production approach, which focuses on the entanglements of scientific and political processes, and the systems-theory-oriented multiple-worlds model, which assumes a clear difference in institutional logics between the scientific and the political field. Since the IPCC has been critically analysed by several studies utilizing resources from the two approaches, we contribute with new insights by bringing in ICES, which is a much less studied organization exposing a different science-policy structure. One important finding is that the two theoretical approaches focus on different aspects, exposing ‘links’ and ‘integration’, both of which we argue are important for analysing and assessing science advisory organizations. Moreover, these aspects can be advantageously integrated into a single theoretical framework.
{"title":"Making Science Relevant: Comparing Two Science Advisory Organizations Beyond the Linear Knowledge Model","authors":"Göran Sundqvist, Sebastian Linke","doi":"10.1007/s11024-024-09528-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09528-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article compares two science advisory organizations: the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and the International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES), with a special focus on how their respective policy systems absorb the knowledge delivered for use in decision processes. The science-policy processes of these two organizations differ in important respects; ICES delivers highly specified knowledge to a specified uptake mechanism, while the IPCC produces unspecified knowledge for an unspecified uptake mechanism. Since both environmental governance areas are criticized for lack of needed action, a comparison is of interest asking how this might relate to the organization of science advice. As theoretical resources for this explorative comparison we utilize two approaches from the field of science and technology studies: the co-production approach, which focuses on the entanglements of scientific and political processes, and the systems-theory-oriented multiple-worlds model, which assumes a clear difference in institutional logics between the scientific and the political field. Since the IPCC has been critically analysed by several studies utilizing resources from the two approaches, we contribute with new insights by bringing in ICES, which is a much less studied organization exposing a different science-policy structure. One important finding is that the two theoretical approaches focus on different aspects, exposing ‘links’ and ‘integration’, both of which we argue are important for analysing and assessing science advisory organizations. Moreover, these aspects can be advantageously integrated into a single theoretical framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140609129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-03DOI: 10.47460/minerva.v5i13.156
Alex Mauricio Alvarez Zurita, Dilia Camacho, Eduardo Simon Velasco Pullupaxi, Carlos Alberto Andocilla Andrade
Emancipatory education is presented as an educational methodology that promotes the empowerment of students to achieve concrete learning goals. In this context, this paper presents a detailed literature review on the subject, to know the characteristics and global trends in emancipatory education. For this, the PRISMA methodology of the bibliographic review was used, and published works from the years 2023 and 2024 were selected, in Scopus databases. The main findings reveal that the topic of the study had a great emphasis in 2023 and that the main countries conducting research in this area are the United States and Brazil. This indicates that emancipatory education continues to be an issue of great international importance and therefore, it is necessary to develop a Latin American initiative.
{"title":"Emancipatory education in the Ecuadorian context: a systematic literature review","authors":"Alex Mauricio Alvarez Zurita, Dilia Camacho, Eduardo Simon Velasco Pullupaxi, Carlos Alberto Andocilla Andrade","doi":"10.47460/minerva.v5i13.156","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47460/minerva.v5i13.156","url":null,"abstract":"Emancipatory education is presented as an educational methodology that promotes the empowerment of students to achieve concrete learning goals. In this context, this paper presents a detailed literature review on the subject, to know the characteristics and global trends in emancipatory education. For this, the PRISMA methodology of the bibliographic review was used, and published works from the years 2023 and 2024 were selected, in Scopus databases. The main findings reveal that the topic of the study had a great emphasis in 2023 and that the main countries conducting research in this area are the United States and Brazil. This indicates that emancipatory education continues to be an issue of great international importance and therefore, it is necessary to develop a Latin American initiative.","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140749789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-03DOI: 10.47460/minerva.v5i13.155
Paola Alexandra Zambrano Cevallos, Kerly Leomar Toala-Vera
Chemistry is an empirical science and as such experimental work in the laboratory (or even at home) must be part of the teaching-learning process. Favorably, Chemistry is a science that allows many simple experiments to be carried out using easily accessible substances and materials. This paper aimed to implement home experiments to promote the learning of mixtures in inorganic chemistry subject. The applied methodology was descriptive and qualitative research. According to the results found, it is mentioned that experimentation goes beyond observation, because it offers the possibility of studying natural phenomena in greater depth, giving way to curiosity as an essential part of this practice. In conclusion, experimental activities in the laboratory are a fundamental part of the teaching and learning of Chemistry. However, many times its implementation can be limited by factors such as the lack of materials and instruments.
{"title":"Home experiments to promote the learning of mixtures in the subject of inorganic chemistry","authors":"Paola Alexandra Zambrano Cevallos, Kerly Leomar Toala-Vera","doi":"10.47460/minerva.v5i13.155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47460/minerva.v5i13.155","url":null,"abstract":"Chemistry is an empirical science and as such experimental work in the laboratory (or even at home) must be part of the teaching-learning process. Favorably, Chemistry is a science that allows many simple experiments to be carried out using easily accessible substances and materials. This paper aimed to implement home experiments to promote the learning of mixtures in inorganic chemistry subject. The applied methodology was descriptive and qualitative research. According to the results found, it is mentioned that experimentation goes beyond observation, because it offers the possibility of studying natural phenomena in greater depth, giving way to curiosity as an essential part of this practice. In conclusion, experimental activities in the laboratory are a fundamental part of the teaching and learning of Chemistry. However, many times its implementation can be limited by factors such as the lack of materials and instruments.","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140747683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-11DOI: 10.1007/s11024-024-09525-3
Mario Clemens, Christian Hochmuth
Universities in many liberal democracies, such as the US, the UK, or Germany, grapple with a pivotal question: how much room should be given to controversial utterances? On the one side, there are those who advocate for limiting permissible speech on campus to create a safe environment for a diverse student body and counter the mainstreaming of extremist views, particularly by right-wing populists. On the other side, concerns arise about stifling the free exchange of ideas and creating an atmosphere of fear and censorship. The debate is further complicated by participants’ occasional uncertainties about the legal norms relevant in the given context, such as when freedom of speech is an issue and when it is not. This paper addresses the question of whether universities should allow actors with primarily political (as opposed to scholarly) agendas to speak on campus. Focusing on German universities, we begin by discussing some of the potentially relevant legal norms. We then propose shifting emphasis from whether we should make room for public political discussions on campus to how such events must be organized so that they deliver the goods that their advocates emphasize while avoiding the dangers of which critics warn. Drawing on conflict management literature concerned with process design, we make several practical suggestions on how to organize an event that brings political discourse to the university campus without causing harm.
{"title":"Political Speech on Campus: Shifting the Emphasis from “if” to “how”","authors":"Mario Clemens, Christian Hochmuth","doi":"10.1007/s11024-024-09525-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09525-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Universities in many liberal democracies, such as the US, the UK, or Germany, grapple with a pivotal question: how much room should be given to controversial utterances? On the one side, there are those who advocate for limiting permissible speech on campus to create a safe environment for a diverse student body and counter the mainstreaming of extremist views, particularly by right-wing populists. On the other side, concerns arise about stifling the free exchange of ideas and creating an atmosphere of fear and censorship. The debate is further complicated by participants’ occasional uncertainties about the legal norms relevant in the given context, such as when freedom of speech is an issue and when it is not. This paper addresses the question of whether universities should allow actors with primarily political (as opposed to scholarly) agendas to speak on campus. Focusing on German universities, we begin by discussing some of the potentially relevant legal norms. We then propose shifting emphasis from <i>whether</i> we should make room for public political discussions on campus to <i>how</i> such events must be organized so that they deliver the goods that their advocates emphasize while avoiding the dangers of which critics warn. Drawing on conflict management literature concerned with process design, we make several practical suggestions on how to organize an event that brings political discourse to the university campus without causing harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140100167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-27DOI: 10.47460/minerva.v5i13.148
Juan Alberto Avalos Reyes, Patricia Mercedes Cepeda Silva, Paul Caceres
This work aimed to design a mathematical model to optimize the cost of heavy agricultural load transport using linear programming. The model was based on studying fixed and variable costs, including distance, cargo volume, arrival and departure times, lubricants, fuels, and other variables that influence transport pricing. The work had a quantitative approach, descriptive type, and its design of the non-experimental character with a cross-section. The methods were used, inductive, deductive, and systemic. For the collection of information, the survey was used as a technique and the questionnaire as an instrument, evidencing that most carriers do not know the calculation of the actual cost of transport, thus visualizing the need for a mathematical model in cost optimization, an achievement validated in the WINQSB program (Network Modeling Module).
{"title":"Mathematical model in the optimization of the cost of heavy agricultural cargo transportation","authors":"Juan Alberto Avalos Reyes, Patricia Mercedes Cepeda Silva, Paul Caceres","doi":"10.47460/minerva.v5i13.148","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47460/minerva.v5i13.148","url":null,"abstract":"This work aimed to design a mathematical model to optimize the cost of heavy agricultural load transport using linear programming. The model was based on studying fixed and variable costs, including distance, cargo volume, arrival and departure times, lubricants, fuels, and other variables that influence transport pricing. The work had a quantitative approach, descriptive type, and its design of the non-experimental character with a cross-section. The methods were used, inductive, deductive, and systemic. For the collection of information, the survey was used as a technique and the questionnaire as an instrument, evidencing that most carriers do not know the calculation of the actual cost of transport, thus visualizing the need for a mathematical model in cost optimization, an achievement validated in the WINQSB program (Network Modeling Module).","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140425826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study examined the impact of environmental education on sustainable tourism. A causal and correlational investigation was carried out of a non-experimental and transversal nature, in which 1,000 tourists who visited the city of Arequipa-Peru participated. These were intentionally selected to represent a specific sample. Two expert-validated surveys were used for data collection. The results indicated a moderate level of environmental education, with foreign professional women showing profound environmental knowledge. On the contrary, young national professionals demonstrated a profound commitment to the environment. These results underscore the significant link between environmental education and sustainable tourism. Nevertheless, a definitive conclusion was not reached about the study, as there could be other contributing factors.
{"title":"Environmental education and sustainable tourism for visitors to Peru","authors":"James Josmell Ojeda Portugal, Cecilia Alejandra Alarcon Vilca, Jeniffer Stephanie Diaz Santivanez, Diana Soledad Maquera Yucra, Raúl Mauro Gonzales-Véliz","doi":"10.47460/minerva.v5i13.147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47460/minerva.v5i13.147","url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the impact of environmental education on sustainable tourism. A causal and correlational investigation was carried out of a non-experimental and transversal nature, in which 1,000 tourists who visited the city of Arequipa-Peru participated. These were intentionally selected to represent a specific sample. Two expert-validated surveys were used for data collection. The results indicated a moderate level of environmental education, with foreign professional women showing profound environmental knowledge. On the contrary, young national professionals demonstrated a profound commitment to the environment. These results underscore the significant link between environmental education and sustainable tourism. Nevertheless, a definitive conclusion was not reached about the study, as there could be other contributing factors.","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140425910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-27DOI: 10.47460/minerva.v5i13.150
Patricio Feijoo, Eduardo Luna
Metallurgical processes in beneficiation plants, generate large quantities of waste called mining tailings, which are harmful to the environment and health due to the heavy metals present. These tailings are sometimes deposited in water effluents, close to mining production areas. Therefore, the purpose of the present investigation was to propose partial remediation of the exposed problem, with the use of zeolite, depositing this mineral on and under the mining tailings, carrying out 10 tests, with variation in the amount of zeolite, from 100 to 500 grams. The trials were subject to an action time of 30 days. The results obtained in the experimentation show that the test with 500 grams, placed at the bottom of the tailings, was the most efficient for the absorption of heavy metals, specifically with results of 43% in lead and 51% in arsenic, which benefits to the environment.
{"title":"Use of calcium zeolite as an absorption agent for arsenic and lead in mine tailings","authors":"Patricio Feijoo, Eduardo Luna","doi":"10.47460/minerva.v5i13.150","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47460/minerva.v5i13.150","url":null,"abstract":"Metallurgical processes in beneficiation plants, generate large quantities of waste called mining tailings, which are harmful to the environment and health due to the heavy metals present. These tailings are sometimes deposited in water effluents, close to mining production areas. Therefore, the purpose of the present investigation was to propose partial remediation of the exposed problem, with the use of zeolite, depositing this mineral on and under the mining tailings, carrying out 10 tests, with variation in the amount of zeolite, from 100 to 500 grams. The trials were subject to an action time of 30 days. The results obtained in the experimentation show that the test with 500 grams, placed at the bottom of the tailings, was the most efficient for the absorption of heavy metals, specifically with results of 43% in lead and 51% in arsenic, which benefits to the environment.","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140424693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-27DOI: 10.47460/minerva.v5i13.149
Cesar Camilo Zambrano Tomala, Jisson Oswaldo Vega Intriago, Marcos Fernando Pazmino Campuzano
This research proposes a pedagogical strategy incorporating digital tools for teaching Social Sciences. A quantitative approach is employed data collection targeting educational authorities, teachers, and students to assess the commitment and feasibility of implementing a new educational proposal. The results reflect the commitment and interest of participants towards creating this pedagogical strategy. Various digital tools are suggested, including Telegram for communication, ChatGPT and Virtual Encyclopedias for content generation, Kahoot and Google Form for assessment, and Timeline JS and Powtoon for dynamic presentations. Finally, the proposal was validated through a comparative study between a control group and an experimental one. The findings indicate that the new pedagogical strategy offers a higher innovation, relevance, and improvement in students' learning process.
本研究提出了一种将数字工具纳入社会科学教学的教学策略。研究采用定量方法收集教育当局、教师和学生的数据,以评估实施新教育建议的承诺和可行性。结果反映了参与者对创建这一教学策略的承诺和兴趣。建议使用各种数字工具,包括用于交流的 Telegram、用于生成内容的 ChatGPT 和虚拟百科全书、用于评估的 Kahoot 和 Google Form 以及用于动态演示的 Timeline JS 和 Powtoon。最后,通过对照组和实验组之间的比较研究验证了该建议。研究结果表明,新的教学策略为学生的学习过程提供了更高的创新性、相关性和改进性。
{"title":"Design of an educational strategy based on digital resources for the teaching of social sciences","authors":"Cesar Camilo Zambrano Tomala, Jisson Oswaldo Vega Intriago, Marcos Fernando Pazmino Campuzano","doi":"10.47460/minerva.v5i13.149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47460/minerva.v5i13.149","url":null,"abstract":"This research proposes a pedagogical strategy incorporating digital tools for teaching Social Sciences. A quantitative approach is employed data collection targeting educational authorities, teachers, and students to assess the commitment and feasibility of implementing a new educational proposal. The results reflect the commitment and interest of participants towards creating this pedagogical strategy. Various digital tools are suggested, including Telegram for communication, ChatGPT and Virtual Encyclopedias for content generation, Kahoot and Google Form for assessment, and Timeline JS and Powtoon for dynamic presentations. Finally, the proposal was validated through a comparative study between a control group and an experimental one. The findings indicate that the new pedagogical strategy offers a higher innovation, relevance, and improvement in students' learning process.","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140425499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-24DOI: 10.1007/s11024-024-09521-7
Alexander Kladakis, Philippe Mongeon, Carter W. Bloch
The notion of science as a stratified system is clearly manifested in the markedly uneven distribution of productivity, rewards, resources, and recognition. Although previous studies have shown that institutional environments for conducting research differ significantly between national science systems, disciplines, and subfields, it remains to be shown whether any systematic variations and patterns in inequalities exist among researchers in different national and domain specific settings. This study investigates the positioning of citation elites as opposed to ‘ordinary’ researchers by way of examining three dimensions of concentration (accumulation of publications and citations, specialisation, and institutional concentration) in biology, economics and physics in Denmark and the UK. Across all three dimensions, we put Richard Whitley’s bipartite theory to the test, suggesting a nexus between the intellectual structure of a discipline and the configuration of its elite. The study draws on a dataset of researchers who published most of their publications in either physics, biology, or economics over the 1980–2018 period and with at least one publication in 2017–2018 while affiliated to either a British or a Danish university. We find higher degrees of concentration in the UK compared to Denmark, and that physics and biology respectively display the greatest and lowest degree of concentration. Similar patterns in disciplinary differences are observed in both countries, suggesting that concentration patterns are largely rooted in disciplinary cultures and merely amplified by the national context.
{"title":"Citation Elites in Polytheistic and Umbrella Disciplines: Patterns of Stratification and Concentration in Danish and British Science","authors":"Alexander Kladakis, Philippe Mongeon, Carter W. Bloch","doi":"10.1007/s11024-024-09521-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09521-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The notion of science as a stratified system is clearly manifested in the markedly uneven distribution of productivity, rewards, resources, and recognition. Although previous studies have shown that institutional environments for conducting research differ significantly between national science systems, disciplines, and subfields, it remains to be shown whether any systematic variations and patterns in inequalities exist among researchers in different national and domain specific settings. This study investigates the positioning of citation elites as opposed to ‘ordinary’ researchers by way of examining three dimensions of concentration (accumulation of publications and citations, specialisation, and institutional concentration) in biology, economics and physics in Denmark and the UK. Across all three dimensions, we put Richard Whitley’s bipartite theory to the test, suggesting a nexus between the intellectual structure of a discipline and the configuration of its elite. The study draws on a dataset of researchers who published most of their publications in either physics, biology, or economics over the 1980–2018 period and with at least one publication in 2017–2018 while affiliated to either a British or a Danish university. We find higher degrees of concentration in the UK compared to Denmark, and that physics and biology respectively display the greatest and lowest degree of concentration. Similar patterns in disciplinary differences are observed in both countries, suggesting that concentration patterns are largely rooted in disciplinary cultures and merely amplified by the national context.</p>","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139955231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-22DOI: 10.1007/s11024-024-09523-5
Maja Elmgren, Åsa Lindberg-Sand, Anders Sonesson
The doctorate forms the basis for academic careers and the regeneration of academia, and has increasingly become important for other sectors of society. The latter is reflected in efforts on institutional, national as well as supranational levels to change and adapt the doctoral degree to new expectations. As doctoral education is embedded in research, changes in governance and funding of research further affect the doctorate. The evaluation of the doctoral thesis appears, however, to have remained true to the academic tradition: an examination committee exercising their gatekeeping in a ceremonial setting. This study sets out to explore doctoral examination committees’ evaluation practices. Insights were gained through six focus group interviews with experienced examination committee members at three large research-intensive universities in Sweden. Of particular interest is how the object of evaluation is formed, the nature of the boundary-work conducted, and variations in examination practices related to different and changing conditions for research and doctoral education. Our results show how the object of evaluation emerges through a gradual interpretation of the thesis and defence, becoming more complex and nuanced as the process of evaluation progresses from its initial stages to the final closed discussions of the committee. The finalised object of evaluation, only fully present at the conclusion of the closed meeting and hence transient in nature, encompasses the research contribution, educational achievement, and academic competence of the candidate. Furthermore, the boundary-work conducted in this process often transcends the object of evaluation to include also supervision and the local context for doctoral education and research, and hence contributes to upholding, and potential changing, norms in research fields, educational contexts, and academia at large. This extended boundary-work intensified as problems and inconsistencies were discovered during the evaluation process. The ceremonial staging underscored the gravity of the decision and the extended boundary-work. Despite changing conditions for the doctorate, our findings highlight the importance of the practice of evaluation committees, and the disciplinary communities to which they belong, for upholding and negotiating norms in academia.
{"title":"Evaluation Practices of Doctoral Examination Committees: Boundary-Work Under Pressure","authors":"Maja Elmgren, Åsa Lindberg-Sand, Anders Sonesson","doi":"10.1007/s11024-024-09523-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09523-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The doctorate forms the basis for academic careers and the regeneration of academia, and has increasingly become important for other sectors of society. The latter is reflected in efforts on institutional, national as well as supranational levels to change and adapt the doctoral degree to new expectations. As doctoral education is embedded in research, changes in governance and funding of research further affect the doctorate. The evaluation of the doctoral thesis appears, however, to have remained true to the academic tradition: an examination committee exercising their gatekeeping in a ceremonial setting. This study sets out to explore doctoral examination committees’ evaluation practices. Insights were gained through six focus group interviews with experienced examination committee members at three large research-intensive universities in Sweden. Of particular interest is how the object of evaluation is formed, the nature of the boundary-work conducted, and variations in examination practices related to different and changing conditions for research and doctoral education. Our results show how the object of evaluation emerges through a gradual interpretation of the thesis and defence, becoming more complex and nuanced as the process of evaluation progresses from its initial stages to the final closed discussions of the committee. The finalised object of evaluation, only fully present at the conclusion of the closed meeting and hence transient in nature, encompasses the research contribution, educational achievement, and academic competence of the candidate. Furthermore, the boundary-work conducted in this process often transcends the object of evaluation to include also supervision and the local context for doctoral education and research, and hence contributes to upholding, and potential changing, norms in research fields, educational contexts, and academia at large. This extended boundary-work intensified as problems and inconsistencies were discovered during the evaluation process. The ceremonial staging underscored the gravity of the decision and the extended boundary-work. Despite changing conditions for the doctorate, our findings highlight the importance of the practice of evaluation committees, and the disciplinary communities to which they belong, for upholding and negotiating norms in academia.</p>","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139955102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}