首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Cognitive Psychology最新文献

英文 中文
Auditory distraction of vocal-motor behaviour by different components of song: testing an interference-by-process account 歌曲中不同成分对发声-运动行为的听觉干扰:测试 "过程干扰 "理论
IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2023.2284404
Rona D. Linklater, Jeannie Judge, Patrik Sörqvist, John E. Marsh
The process-oriented account of auditory distraction suggests that task-disruption is a consequence of the joint action of task- and sound-related processes. Here, four experiments put this view to...
以过程为导向的听觉分心理论认为,任务中断是任务和声音相关过程共同作用的结果。在这里,四项实验将这一观点付诸实践。
{"title":"Auditory distraction of vocal-motor behaviour by different components of song: testing an interference-by-process account","authors":"Rona D. Linklater, Jeannie Judge, Patrik Sörqvist, John E. Marsh","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2023.2284404","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2284404","url":null,"abstract":"The process-oriented account of auditory distraction suggests that task-disruption is a consequence of the joint action of task- and sound-related processes. Here, four experiments put this view to...","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138559504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Warning—taboo words ahead! Avoiding attentional capture by spoken taboo distractors 前方有禁忌词避免注意力被口语禁忌分心物吸引
IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2023.2285860
Laura Rettie, Robert F. Potter, Gayle Brewer, Federica Degno, François Vachon, Robert W. Hughes, John E. Marsh
We examine whether the disruption of serial short-term memory (STM) by spoken taboo distractors is due to attentional diversion and unrelated to the underlying disruptive effect of sound on serial ...
我们研究了有声禁忌分心物对串行短时记忆(STM)的干扰是否是由于注意力转移所致,而与声音对串行短时记忆的潜在干扰作用无关。
{"title":"Warning—taboo words ahead! Avoiding attentional capture by spoken taboo distractors","authors":"Laura Rettie, Robert F. Potter, Gayle Brewer, Federica Degno, François Vachon, Robert W. Hughes, John E. Marsh","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2023.2285860","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2285860","url":null,"abstract":"We examine whether the disruption of serial short-term memory (STM) by spoken taboo distractors is due to attentional diversion and unrelated to the underlying disruptive effect of sound on serial ...","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138547367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of cognitive load on perceived internal and external distraction and their relationship with attentional control 认知负荷对内外部分心的影响及其与注意控制的关系
4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2023.2273576
Jan Rummel, Fynn Ole Wöstenfeld, Lena Steindorf, Jan Philipp Röer
ABSTRACTPeople are assumed to differ in their susceptibility to distraction, depending on their attentional control abilities. Accordingly, susceptibility to internal distraction (in terms of self-generated task-irrelevant thoughts) and to external distraction (in terms of task-irrelevant environmental stimuli) are considered two facets of a global attention-distractibility factor. While it is plausible that these two constructs overlap to some extent, susceptibility to internal and external distraction may nevertheless differ across situations. We thus investigated whether objective changes in external stimulation (manipulated by the presence versus absence of concurrent irrelevant speech) differentially affect perceived external and internal distraction during an ongoing task, and how both distraction types are related to attentional control. In Experiment 1, we used a working-memory task as ongoing task, in Experiment 2, we used a less demanding lexical-decision task. Results of both experiments consistently showed that perceived external distraction was increased whereas perceived internal distraction was decreased under irrelevant speech. Interestingly, attentional control was weakly positively related with perceived external distraction under irrelevant speech conditions. These results highlight that mutual dependencies between internal and external distraction experiences may be more complex than hitherto assumed.KEYWORDS: distractiontask-unrelated thoughtsirrelevant speechmind wandering Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 We thank Matthew Robison for sharing his programme with us.2 We thank Frederik Wallner, who also wrote his master thesis in this project, for his help with the data collection.3 We thank an anonymous reviewer for bringing this interpretation of the findings to our attention
摘要人们被认为对注意力分散的易感性是不同的,这取决于他们的注意力控制能力。因此,对内部分心的易感性(就自我产生的与任务无关的想法而言)和对外部分心的易感性(就与任务无关的环境刺激而言)被认为是全球注意力分心因素的两个方面。虽然这两种结构在某种程度上重叠是合理的,但对内部和外部分心的易感性可能在不同的情况下有所不同。因此,我们研究了在正在进行的任务中,外部刺激的客观变化(由并发不相关言语的存在或不存在操纵)是否会对感知到的外部和内部分心产生不同的影响,以及这两种分心类型如何与注意控制相关。在实验1中,我们使用工作记忆任务作为进行中任务,在实验2中,我们使用要求较低的词汇决策任务。实验结果一致表明,在不相关言语作用下,被试的外部干扰增加,内部干扰减少。有趣的是,在无关言语条件下,注意控制与感知到的外部分心呈弱正相关。这些结果强调,内部和外部分心体验之间的相互依赖关系可能比迄今为止认为的要复杂得多。关键词:注意力分散任务无关思想相关言论走神披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突我们感谢马修·罗宾逊与我们分享他的节目我们感谢Frederik Wallner,他也是这个项目的硕士论文的作者,他对数据收集的帮助我们感谢一位匿名审稿人让我们注意到他对研究结果的解释
{"title":"Effects of cognitive load on perceived internal and external distraction and their relationship with attentional control","authors":"Jan Rummel, Fynn Ole Wöstenfeld, Lena Steindorf, Jan Philipp Röer","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2023.2273576","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2273576","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPeople are assumed to differ in their susceptibility to distraction, depending on their attentional control abilities. Accordingly, susceptibility to internal distraction (in terms of self-generated task-irrelevant thoughts) and to external distraction (in terms of task-irrelevant environmental stimuli) are considered two facets of a global attention-distractibility factor. While it is plausible that these two constructs overlap to some extent, susceptibility to internal and external distraction may nevertheless differ across situations. We thus investigated whether objective changes in external stimulation (manipulated by the presence versus absence of concurrent irrelevant speech) differentially affect perceived external and internal distraction during an ongoing task, and how both distraction types are related to attentional control. In Experiment 1, we used a working-memory task as ongoing task, in Experiment 2, we used a less demanding lexical-decision task. Results of both experiments consistently showed that perceived external distraction was increased whereas perceived internal distraction was decreased under irrelevant speech. Interestingly, attentional control was weakly positively related with perceived external distraction under irrelevant speech conditions. These results highlight that mutual dependencies between internal and external distraction experiences may be more complex than hitherto assumed.KEYWORDS: distractiontask-unrelated thoughtsirrelevant speechmind wandering Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 We thank Matthew Robison for sharing his programme with us.2 We thank Frederik Wallner, who also wrote his master thesis in this project, for his help with the data collection.3 We thank an anonymous reviewer for bringing this interpretation of the findings to our attention","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":"53 28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136069558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of contextual factors on neurocognitive processing: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the effect of response types in cognitive tasks 情境因素在神经认知加工中的作用:对认知任务中反应类型影响的系统回顾和荟萃分析
4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2023.2260050
Camilo Arévalo-Romero, Stefanella Costa-Cordella, Daniel Rojas-Líbano
ABSTRACTCognitive performance depends on contextual elements, such as the response type (“Go/No-Go” (GNG) or “Two-Alternative Choice” (TAC)) used in experimental tasks. In general, it is assumed that GNG shows faster response times and lower error rates than TAC. To systematically analyze these effects, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of GNG and TAC on cognitive processing across experimental paradigms. After examination of diverse databases, 24 scientific articles were included. We found eight different cognitive tasks, presentling results mainly of behavioural variables, with only three studies including neural recordings. We found that GNG shows faster response times and lower error rates than TAC, although this changes depending on task configurations. The scarce neural evidence suggests that the differences might occur at early processing stages. Future simultaneously recorded behavioural and electrophysiological data is needed to gain better understanding of these contextual effects.KEYWORDS: Cognitive processes; experimental cognitive tasksGo/No-Go‌Two-Alternative Choice; visual information processing; contextual factors Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementFree access to meta-analysis data in OSF (https://osf.io/c6tnb). In OSF you can also access all the material related to the process of this work (https://osf.io/jkbev/files/osfstorage).Notes1 For this work, “target stimulus” will refer to the content of the visual stimulus that meets the task’s requirement. When it appears on the screen, the participants must direct an open GNG response (i.e., Go response) and an affirmative response in TAC (i.e., Yes response).2 We are indebted to an anonymous reviewer of this article for suggesting the idea of this plot.3 Wühr and Heuer's (Citation2022) results are not considered here because they counterbalanced the target stimulus for each participant.Additional informationFundingThis project was financed by the Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo de Chile (ANID) through the Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (FONDECYT) Iniciación en Investigación N° 11190604 granted to DRL and FONDECYT Postdoctorado N° 3220844 granted to SCC.
摘要认知表现取决于情境因素,如实验任务中使用的反应类型(“去/不去”(GNG)或“两种选择”(TAC))。通常,假设GNG的响应时间比TAC快,错误率比TAC低。为了系统分析这些影响,我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估GNG和TAC在不同实验范式下对认知加工的影响。在对不同数据库进行检查后,纳入了24篇科学文章。我们发现了8种不同的认知任务,主要呈现行为变量的结果,只有3项研究包括神经记录。我们发现GNG比TAC的响应时间更快,错误率更低,尽管这取决于任务配置。缺乏的神经学证据表明,这种差异可能发生在早期处理阶段。未来需要同时记录行为和电生理数据,以更好地理解这些背景效应。关键词:认知过程;实验认知任务go /No-Go;视觉信息处理;背景因素披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性statementosf中元分析数据的免费访问(https://osf.io/c6tnb)。在OSF中,您还可以访问与此工作过程相关的所有材料(https://osf.io/jkbev/files/osfstorage)。注1在本工作中,“目标刺激”是指满足任务要求的视觉刺激的内容。当它出现在屏幕上时,参与者必须指示一个开放的GNG响应(即Go响应)和TAC中的肯定响应(即Yes响应)我们感谢本文的一位匿名评论者,他提出了这个情节的想法w和Heuer (Citation2022)的结果在这里不被考虑,因为他们平衡了每个参与者的目标刺激。本项目由智利国家研究与发展机构Investigación (ANID)资助,通过智利国家研究与发展基金会Científico y Tecnológico (FONDECYT) Iniciación en Investigación (N°11190604)资助DRL, FONDECYT博士后基金(N°3220844)资助SCC。
{"title":"The role of contextual factors on neurocognitive processing: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the effect of response types in cognitive tasks","authors":"Camilo Arévalo-Romero, Stefanella Costa-Cordella, Daniel Rojas-Líbano","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2023.2260050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2260050","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTCognitive performance depends on contextual elements, such as the response type (“Go/No-Go” (GNG) or “Two-Alternative Choice” (TAC)) used in experimental tasks. In general, it is assumed that GNG shows faster response times and lower error rates than TAC. To systematically analyze these effects, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of GNG and TAC on cognitive processing across experimental paradigms. After examination of diverse databases, 24 scientific articles were included. We found eight different cognitive tasks, presentling results mainly of behavioural variables, with only three studies including neural recordings. We found that GNG shows faster response times and lower error rates than TAC, although this changes depending on task configurations. The scarce neural evidence suggests that the differences might occur at early processing stages. Future simultaneously recorded behavioural and electrophysiological data is needed to gain better understanding of these contextual effects.KEYWORDS: Cognitive processes; experimental cognitive tasksGo/No-Go‌Two-Alternative Choice; visual information processing; contextual factors Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementFree access to meta-analysis data in OSF (https://osf.io/c6tnb). In OSF you can also access all the material related to the process of this work (https://osf.io/jkbev/files/osfstorage).Notes1 For this work, “target stimulus” will refer to the content of the visual stimulus that meets the task’s requirement. When it appears on the screen, the participants must direct an open GNG response (i.e., Go response) and an affirmative response in TAC (i.e., Yes response).2 We are indebted to an anonymous reviewer of this article for suggesting the idea of this plot.3 Wühr and Heuer's (Citation2022) results are not considered here because they counterbalanced the target stimulus for each participant.Additional informationFundingThis project was financed by the Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo de Chile (ANID) through the Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (FONDECYT) Iniciación en Investigación N° 11190604 granted to DRL and FONDECYT Postdoctorado N° 3220844 granted to SCC.","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136314273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fluency trumps working memory capacity in the truth effect 在真相效应中,流利度胜过工作记忆容量
4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2023.2260048
Chan Wai Mak, Weng-Tink Chooi
ABSTRACTThe truth effect, wherein repeated information gains perceived truthfulness, has been extensively studied in participants’ primary languages, showing robustness. However, individual differences in the truth effect due to working memory capacity (WMC) remain less explored. This study tested the truth effect and its relation to WMC amongst 130 young adults in Malaysia via Zoom. They were first exposed to 45 semantically meaningless statements (exposure phase). Then, participants completed a series of working memory tasks, including Backward Digit Span, Operation Span and Symmetry Span, before being exposed to the same 45 statements and 15 new statements. In the second exposure (rating phase), participants rated each statement on a 6-point Likert scale on its fluency and truth value. Results indicated fluency's significant association with the truth effect, consistent with prior research, while WMC showed no significant relationship. The truth effect persisted even when presented in a non-native language, highlighting its cross-linguistic significance.KEYWORDS: perceived truthworking memoryprocessing fluencynon-WEIRDcognitive bias Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Publication ethicsInformed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study. All procedures in the study were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of Human Research Ethics Committee USM (HREC). Study protocol number [20060303].AuthorshipChan Wai Mak, writing—original draft, data curation, formal analysis; Weng-Tink Chooi, methodology, supervision, writing—review & editing.All authors approved the final version of the article.Open dataThe data that support the findings of this study are openly available at Open Science Framework http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/WU4JQ.Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by Universiti Sains Malaysia Short-Term Grant (304/PSOSIAL/6315579) to WENG-TINK CHOOI.
摘要真实效应,即重复信息获得感知的真实性,在被试的母语中得到了广泛的研究,显示出鲁棒性。然而,由于工作记忆容量(WMC)导致的真相效应的个体差异仍然很少被探索。本研究通过Zoom测试了马来西亚130名年轻人的真实效应及其与WMC的关系。他们首先被暴露在45个语义无意义的语句中(暴露阶段)。然后,参与者完成了一系列工作记忆任务,包括倒向数字广度、运算广度和对称广度,然后再看同样的45个语句和15个新语句。在第二次曝光(评分阶段),参与者用6分的李克特量表对每个陈述的流利度和真实值进行评分。结果表明,流利度与真实效应显著相关,与前人的研究结果一致,而WMC没有显著相关。即使在非母语中呈现,真相效应仍然存在,突出了它的跨语言意义。关键词:感知真相工作记忆加工流畅性非怪异认知偏差披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突出版伦理所有参与研究的参与者均获得了知情同意。本研究的所有程序均按照人类研究伦理委员会USM (HREC)的伦理标准进行。研究方案号[20060303]。作者陈伟麦,写作-原稿,数据整理,形式分析;崔翁婷,研究方法、指导、写作、评审、编辑。所有作者都认可了文章的最终版本。开放数据支持本研究结果的数据可在开放科学框架http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/WU4JQ.Additional上公开获取。本研究由马来西亚理科大学短期资助(304/ psocial /6315579)资助给WENG-TINK choi。
{"title":"Fluency trumps working memory capacity in the truth effect","authors":"Chan Wai Mak, Weng-Tink Chooi","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2023.2260048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2260048","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe truth effect, wherein repeated information gains perceived truthfulness, has been extensively studied in participants’ primary languages, showing robustness. However, individual differences in the truth effect due to working memory capacity (WMC) remain less explored. This study tested the truth effect and its relation to WMC amongst 130 young adults in Malaysia via Zoom. They were first exposed to 45 semantically meaningless statements (exposure phase). Then, participants completed a series of working memory tasks, including Backward Digit Span, Operation Span and Symmetry Span, before being exposed to the same 45 statements and 15 new statements. In the second exposure (rating phase), participants rated each statement on a 6-point Likert scale on its fluency and truth value. Results indicated fluency's significant association with the truth effect, consistent with prior research, while WMC showed no significant relationship. The truth effect persisted even when presented in a non-native language, highlighting its cross-linguistic significance.KEYWORDS: perceived truthworking memoryprocessing fluencynon-WEIRDcognitive bias Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Publication ethicsInformed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study. All procedures in the study were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of Human Research Ethics Committee USM (HREC). Study protocol number [20060303].AuthorshipChan Wai Mak, writing—original draft, data curation, formal analysis; Weng-Tink Chooi, methodology, supervision, writing—review & editing.All authors approved the final version of the article.Open dataThe data that support the findings of this study are openly available at Open Science Framework http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/WU4JQ.Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by Universiti Sains Malaysia Short-Term Grant (304/PSOSIAL/6315579) to WENG-TINK CHOOI.","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136314856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Leaping across the mental canyon: higher-order long-distance analogical retrieval 跨越精神峡谷:高阶远距离类比检索
4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2023-09-05 DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2023.2253997
Shir Dekel, Bruce Burns, Micah Goldwater
Previous experiments have shown that a comparison of two written narratives highlights their shared relational structure, which in turn facilitates the retrieval of analogous narratives from the past. However, analogical retrieval occurs across domains that appear more conceptually distant than merely different narratives, and the deepest analogies use matches in higher-order relational structure. The present study investigated whether schema abstraction can facilitate analogical retrieval of higher-order relations across written narratives and abstract symbolic problems. Participants read stories which became retrieval targets after a delay, cued by either analogous stories or letter-strings. We replicated prior research that used narrative retrieval cues, and also found clear evidence that a comparison of analogous letter-string problems and explanation of the underlying principle facilitated the retrieval of source stories with analogous higher-order relations. These findings show that the schemas abstracted from comparison of narratives can be transferred to non-semantic symbolic domains.
先前的实验表明,两种书面叙述的比较突出了它们共同的关系结构,这反过来又有助于从过去检索类似的叙述。然而,类比检索发生在跨领域,这些领域在概念上似乎比不同的叙述更遥远,最深的类比使用高阶关系结构中的匹配。本研究探讨图式抽象是否能促进高阶关系在书面叙述和抽象符号问题中的类比检索。参与者阅读的故事在被类似的故事或字母串提示后延迟成为检索目标。我们复制了先前使用叙事检索线索的研究,并发现明确的证据表明,比较类似的字母字符串问题和解释潜在原理有助于检索具有类似高阶关系的源故事。这些发现表明,从叙事比较中提取的图式可以转移到非语义的符号域。
{"title":"Leaping across the mental canyon: higher-order long-distance analogical retrieval","authors":"Shir Dekel, Bruce Burns, Micah Goldwater","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2023.2253997","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2253997","url":null,"abstract":"Previous experiments have shown that a comparison of two written narratives highlights their shared relational structure, which in turn facilitates the retrieval of analogous narratives from the past. However, analogical retrieval occurs across domains that appear more conceptually distant than merely different narratives, and the deepest analogies use matches in higher-order relational structure. The present study investigated whether schema abstraction can facilitate analogical retrieval of higher-order relations across written narratives and abstract symbolic problems. Participants read stories which became retrieval targets after a delay, cued by either analogous stories or letter-strings. We replicated prior research that used narrative retrieval cues, and also found clear evidence that a comparison of analogous letter-string problems and explanation of the underlying principle facilitated the retrieval of source stories with analogous higher-order relations. These findings show that the schemas abstracted from comparison of narratives can be transferred to non-semantic symbolic domains.","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":"306 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135320124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How attentional resources of the same or across sensory modalities and task load affect cognitive performance? A multi-sensory integration study 相同或跨感觉模式和任务负荷的注意资源如何影响认知表现?多感觉统合研究
IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2023-08-24 DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2023.2249627
Ling Lee Cheong, Melanie Jing Yan Kee, Po Ling Chen
ABSTRACT This study examined how attentional resources of the same or across sensory modalities with varying levels of task load affect cognitive performance. A total of 120 young adults completed an experiment that simultaneously processed either visual–visual (V–V) or visual–auditory (V–A) stimuli. A mixed ANOVA revealed that performance in the V–V experiment was superior to the V–A experiment. Furthermore, performance was significantly better for single tasks relative to dual tasks. The interaction effect showed that increased task load significantly impacted the performance in the V–V experiment but not in the V–A experiment. The findings implied that multi-sensory integration is only more manageable when information processing involves the same type of (visual) sensory modality and with low task load, but less effective for high-level attentional tasks even with the same sensory modality. The effectiveness of cross-modal multi-sensory integration can be compromised potentially due to the inhibitory effect of audio over visual information.
本研究考察了不同任务负荷水平下相同或跨感觉模式的注意资源对认知表现的影响。共有120名年轻人完成了一项实验,他们同时处理视觉-视觉(V-V)或视觉-听觉(V-A)刺激。混合方差分析显示,V-V实验的表现优于V-A实验。此外,单任务的表现明显优于双任务。交互效应表明,任务负荷的增加对V-V实验的表现有显著影响,而对V-A实验的表现无显著影响。研究结果表明,只有当信息处理涉及相同类型的(视觉)感觉模态和低任务负荷时,多感觉整合才更容易管理,但对于具有相同感觉模态的高注意力任务,多感觉整合的效果较差。由于音频对视觉信息的抑制作用,跨模态多感觉整合的有效性可能受到潜在的损害。
{"title":"How attentional resources of the same or across sensory modalities and task load affect cognitive performance? A multi-sensory integration study","authors":"Ling Lee Cheong, Melanie Jing Yan Kee, Po Ling Chen","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2023.2249627","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2249627","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study examined how attentional resources of the same or across sensory modalities with varying levels of task load affect cognitive performance. A total of 120 young adults completed an experiment that simultaneously processed either visual–visual (V–V) or visual–auditory (V–A) stimuli. A mixed ANOVA revealed that performance in the V–V experiment was superior to the V–A experiment. Furthermore, performance was significantly better for single tasks relative to dual tasks. The interaction effect showed that increased task load significantly impacted the performance in the V–V experiment but not in the V–A experiment. The findings implied that multi-sensory integration is only more manageable when information processing involves the same type of (visual) sensory modality and with low task load, but less effective for high-level attentional tasks even with the same sensory modality. The effectiveness of cross-modal multi-sensory integration can be compromised potentially due to the inhibitory effect of audio over visual information.","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":"812 - 820"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"60004402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Olfactory and visual vs. multimodal landmark processing in human wayfinding: a virtual reality experiment 人类寻路中的嗅觉和视觉与多模式地标处理:一个虚拟现实实验
IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2023-08-21 DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2023.2248685
Elisa Arena, K. Hamburger
ABSTRACT Recent studies suggest that the olfactory system is not as indiscriminative as previously thought. Odours can serve as useful landmark information. The current study explored recognition and wayfinding performance in 54 participants (52 at t2), who either received 18 unimodal (only visual or olfactory) or multimodal (visual-olfactory) landmark information during a learning phase in a virtual reality maze before finding their way through it. Recognition performance was assessed in a recognition task (18 targets, 18 distractors). The experiment was repeated after one month. As expected, participants showed poorer recognition performance if presented with odours compared to the other two conditions. But, recognition performance did not decline over time. Wayfinding performance was similar across all conditions. However, odours were the only condition with stable performance over time, possibly due to emotional mediation and deeper processing. Multimodal material added no value to wayfinding performance, supposedly due to higher cognitive load.
摘要最近的研究表明,嗅觉系统并不像以前认为的那样不可区分。气味可以作为有用的地标信息。目前的研究探索了54名参与者(t2时为52名)的识别和寻路表现,他们在虚拟现实迷宫的学习阶段接受了18个单一模式(仅视觉或嗅觉)或多模式(视觉-嗅觉)的地标信息,然后才找到路。在识别任务中评估了识别表现(18个目标,18个干扰物)。一个月后重复实验。正如预期的那样,与其他两种情况相比,如果参与者出现气味,他们的识别性能会较差。但是,识别性能并没有随着时间的推移而下降。所有条件下的寻路性能相似。然而,气味是随着时间推移表现稳定的唯一条件,可能是由于情绪调解和更深层次的处理。据推测,由于认知负荷较高,多模式材料对寻路性能没有任何价值。
{"title":"Olfactory and visual vs. multimodal landmark processing in human wayfinding: a virtual reality experiment","authors":"Elisa Arena, K. Hamburger","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2023.2248685","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2248685","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recent studies suggest that the olfactory system is not as indiscriminative as previously thought. Odours can serve as useful landmark information. The current study explored recognition and wayfinding performance in 54 participants (52 at t2), who either received 18 unimodal (only visual or olfactory) or multimodal (visual-olfactory) landmark information during a learning phase in a virtual reality maze before finding their way through it. Recognition performance was assessed in a recognition task (18 targets, 18 distractors). The experiment was repeated after one month. As expected, participants showed poorer recognition performance if presented with odours compared to the other two conditions. But, recognition performance did not decline over time. Wayfinding performance was similar across all conditions. However, odours were the only condition with stable performance over time, possibly due to emotional mediation and deeper processing. Multimodal material added no value to wayfinding performance, supposedly due to higher cognitive load.","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":"688 - 709"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42576097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Cognitive load reduces context recollection for true sentences 认知负荷降低了对真实句子的语境回忆
IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2023-08-17 DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2023.2245600
Daria Ford, M. Nieznański
ABSTRACT The dual-recollection model has been successfully applied in research on memory for truth and falsity, suggesting that “true” feedback is better recollected than “false” feedback. We used this approach to test whether the Cartesian or the Spinozan model would be a better framework to describe processes underlying memory for truth and falsity. Our sample consisted of 108 students, who performed the conjoint recognition test under: no-load, refreshing-interference or rehearsal-interference conditions. We found no difference in the rate of falsely attributing “true” label to false sentences than vice versa under cognitive load, which supported the Cartesian model. Multinomial processing tree model analyses confirmed better context memory for true than false sentences in no-load condition. Cognitive load mostly influenced context recollection for true sentences, with nonsignificant effects on context recollection for false sentences, which contradicts the Spinozan model.
摘要双回忆模型已成功应用于真假记忆的研究,表明“真”反馈比“假”反馈更容易被记忆。我们使用这种方法来测试笛卡尔模型和斯宾诺莎模型是否会是一个更好的框架来描述真实和虚假的潜在记忆过程。我们的样本包括108名学生,他们在空载、刷新干扰和排练干扰条件下进行联合识别测试。我们发现在认知负荷下,错误地将“正确”标签归因于错误句子的比率与错误地将“正确”标签归因于错误句子的比率没有差异,这支持了笛卡尔模型。多项处理树模型分析证实,在空载条件下,真句的上下文记忆优于假句。认知负荷主要影响真句的情境回忆,而对假句的情境回忆影响不显著,这与斯宾诺莎模型相矛盾。
{"title":"Cognitive load reduces context recollection for true sentences","authors":"Daria Ford, M. Nieznański","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2023.2245600","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2245600","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The dual-recollection model has been successfully applied in research on memory for truth and falsity, suggesting that “true” feedback is better recollected than “false” feedback. We used this approach to test whether the Cartesian or the Spinozan model would be a better framework to describe processes underlying memory for truth and falsity. Our sample consisted of 108 students, who performed the conjoint recognition test under: no-load, refreshing-interference or rehearsal-interference conditions. We found no difference in the rate of falsely attributing “true” label to false sentences than vice versa under cognitive load, which supported the Cartesian model. Multinomial processing tree model analyses confirmed better context memory for true than false sentences in no-load condition. Cognitive load mostly influenced context recollection for true sentences, with nonsignificant effects on context recollection for false sentences, which contradicts the Spinozan model.","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":"663 - 676"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45903041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early reading profiles of L2 English learners: how orthographic knowledge predicts reading comprehension 二语英语学习者的早期阅读概况:正字法知识如何预测阅读理解
IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2023-08-16 DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2023.2247610
Xingzi Zhang, Haiming Xu, H. Zhang, Jie Sun, Chichi Wang, Zhenxia Pei
ABSTRACT This study examined the nature of orthographic knowledge in second langauge (L2) literacy acquisition among Chinese young readers of English as a foreign language (EFL). One hundred and four third-grade Chinese EFL children participated in this study and they completed a battery of reading measures, including phonological awareness, orthographic knowledge, vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension. Drawing upon hierarchical regression and path analysis, the study found that orthographic knowledge and vocabulary knowledge explained a unique proportion of variance in L2 English reading comprehension after phonological awareness was accounted for. It was also observed that vocabulary knowledge had a mediating effect on both orthographic knowledge and reading comprehension, whereas phonological awareness did not induce mediating patterns. These findings substantiate the unique contribution of orthographic knowledge to L2 English reading comprehension, and provide empirical evidence for the current models of reading for young L2 English readers.
{"title":"Early reading profiles of L2 English learners: how orthographic knowledge predicts reading comprehension","authors":"Xingzi Zhang, Haiming Xu, H. Zhang, Jie Sun, Chichi Wang, Zhenxia Pei","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2023.2247610","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2247610","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study examined the nature of orthographic knowledge in second langauge (L2) literacy acquisition among Chinese young readers of English as a foreign language (EFL). One hundred and four third-grade Chinese EFL children participated in this study and they completed a battery of reading measures, including phonological awareness, orthographic knowledge, vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension. Drawing upon hierarchical regression and path analysis, the study found that orthographic knowledge and vocabulary knowledge explained a unique proportion of variance in L2 English reading comprehension after phonological awareness was accounted for. It was also observed that vocabulary knowledge had a mediating effect on both orthographic knowledge and reading comprehension, whereas phonological awareness did not induce mediating patterns. These findings substantiate the unique contribution of orthographic knowledge to L2 English reading comprehension, and provide empirical evidence for the current models of reading for young L2 English readers.","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49514653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1