Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning最新文献

Problem description

Without externally validated tools to assess teaching and learning curriculum (TLC) programs, our program has undertaken continuous quality improvement (CQI) methods to make revisions in response to resident, programmatic, and accreditation demands.

Quality improvement methods

Key stakeholders, including the college of pharmacy, the residents, and the executive committee, were engaged in discussion and feedback was solicited.

Results of CQI inquiry

The demands identified prompted revision of the TLC teaching component, programming, and timeline. Major changes have included adding an application for the teaching track, limiting teaching track participation, altering the seminar format (to a mix of in person, virtual, and asynchronous), and starting the program earlier in the calendar year. Key stakeholders supported the proposed revisions.

Interpretation and discussion

The CQI method summarized here worked well for the TLC. Although simplistic in nature, it met the needs of the TLC and engaged several stakeholders. No major challenges were encountered during the process and stakeholders were amenable to the process and proposed revisions. Given the lack of externally validated tools for assessing TLC programs, any TLC program could perform a similar CQI method to assist with revisions.

Conclusion

Continuous quality improvement of the TLC to address resident, programmatic, and accreditation demands has been vital to optimize and sustain the program. Assessment will be ongoing as future revisions are made.

Background and purpose

Individualized assessment of students in skills-based courses is essential for practice readiness, however recruiting evaluators is challenging. Our school of pharmacy offers a teaching certificate program for postgraduate year one pharmacy residents (PGY1 residents; PGY1s) which requires completion of a teaching experience. The longitudinal layered learning assessment experience (LLLAE) was designed to meet instructional needs for individualized assessment of first-year pharmacy students' communication skills and provide a meaningful teaching opportunity for PGY1s. This manuscript describes the implementation and evaluates the impact of the LLLAE.

Educational activity and setting

PGY1s were invited to participate in the yearlong LLLAE. Faculty developed PGY1s' skills through training sessions, direct observation, and debrief sessions. PGY1s evaluated students and provided feedback using pre-defined criteria during 3 summative assessments (capstones). Capstones were common pharmacy practice scenarios in which students interact with an actor serving as a standardized patient or provider. PGY1s completed an end-of-year survey to self-rate their improvement in evaluating students, providing feedback, and confidence.

Findings

Twenty-two PGY1s participated in the LLLAE over 2 years. They evaluated 73.2% of total capstone interactions. The end-of-year survey was completed by 20 PGY1s (90.9% response rate). All respondents indicated improvement in their skills to evaluate students, ability to provide feedback, and confidence. Scores were 4 or 5 (scale of 1 to 5) across all measures. Key contributors fostering improvement were the training and debrief sessions, faculty feedback, pre-defined criteria, and multiple practice opportunities.

Summary

This novel layered learning approach was a win-win for faculty and PGY1s. The approach improved feasibility for faculty to continue individualized student assessment while mentoring early career pharmacists. PGY1s gained an opportunity to contribute to student growth, learn from experienced faculty, and develop skills for practice. Additionally, students benefited from individualized feedback.

Introduction

Due to the significance of interpersonal empathy and emotional intelligence in pharmaceutical practices, it has become essential to emphasize its importance in pharmacy education. The aim of this study is to provide pharmacy students, who require proper communication skills throughout their professional careers, with a simulation-based intervention focusing on empathy and emotional intelligence, and to evaluate the influence of this educational intervention on emotional intelligence and empathy levels.

Methods

The methodological approach adopted in this study aims to integrate both qualitative and quantitative data for a comprehensive analysis, that is, the mixed method, and to provide in-depth answers to the research questions.

Results

There was a difference observed in the change in empathy and emotional intelligence scores between the control and intervention groups. When the pre-test and mid-test results with the intervention group were analyzed, there was a difference in the values for emotional intelligence when only education was offered. Conversely, no difference was found in empathy scores under the same conditions. In the intervention group, after the implementation of both training and simulation practice resulted in a difference in the scores for emotional intelligence and empathy when comparing the results before and after the test. Gender and the interaction between gender and group had small effect sizes on both empathy and emotional intelligence. The comprehensive data collected from these interviews enabled a rigorous thematic analysis, culminating in the identification of three primary themes accompanied by respective categories: the contribution of theoretical education to simulation, perceptions of simulation practice, the significance of debriefing sessions. Students highlighted the development of various communication skills, such as improving patient-provider relationships, conveying empathy to patients, being aware of and managing their emotions, and building self-confidence through simulated encounters and debriefing sessions.

Conclusion

Based on these findings, it is recommended that simulation methods be made mandatory in pharmacy school curricula and be disseminated nationwide.

Background

Our objective was to create an intentional Interprofessional Education Experience (IEE) that satisfied the requirements set forth by the Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE 2013), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standard 11, and the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) Competencies. These frameworks elevate the importance of interprofessional education in pharmacy. They not only guide educational standards but also emphasize the crucial role of collaborative healthcare practices in ensuring comprehensive patient care and improving health outcomes. Our evaluation of PharmD students' attainment of Interprofessional Education (IPE) learning outcomes employed both quantitative and qualitative assessment methods to provide a comprehensive understanding of their achievements.

Interprofessional education activity

Fourteen PharmD students participated in an intentional IEE experience in a community dental clinic, collaborating with the dental clinic team and patients. Assessment methods combined quantitative data from SPICE-R2 with qualitative insights from daily reflections and an IPE Field Encounter based on IPEC Competencies. This approach ensured a thorough evaluation across individual experiences.

Discussion

Quantitative analysis revealed a statistically increase in mean scores for four out of ten questions on the SPICE-R2 instrument. Qualitative data analysis utilized grounded theory to analyze emerging themes.

Implications

Employing both quantitative and qualitative assessment methods in this intentional IEE environment has proved beneficial in assessing IPE learning outcomes. The PharmD students were able to deliver patient-centered care as valuable members of an interprofessional healthcare team.

Purpose

This wisdom of experience commentary, written by three pharmacy educators of various backgrounds - PharmD, PhD, and EdD - will discuss potential contributors to the lack of professional advocacy exhibited by pharmacists. Authors will describe the issue using a “What? So What? Now What?” reflective model.

Description

Students enrolled in 14 cohorts at two US colleges of pharmacy possess similar CliftonStrengths® top 5 themes with four themes most commonly reappearing in the top 5: Achiever, Learner, Harmony, and Restorative. These themes are housed in three of the four CliftonStrengths® domains: Executing, Relationship Building, and Strategic Thinking. Themes in the fourth domain, Influencing, were not represented in the top 5. Students from these same cohorts reported a self-identified weakness in their ability to Challenge the Process and Inspire a Shared Vision, two of five leadership practices described by Kouzes and Posner.

Analysis/interpretation

The authors explore the possibility that the lack of evolution within the pharmacy profession is a result of the inherent tendencies of the typical student pharmacist and faculty member, coupled with the lack of curricular accreditation expectations focused on teaching and assessing professional advocacy.

Conclusions

As educators at institutions poised to adopt new educational outcomes in our respective colleges and schools of pharmacy, institutions must take a holistic view of the profession and ensure the curricula prepare graduates to handle the many challenges awaiting them post-graduation. This may require pharmacy educators to make changes in their pedagogical approaches, addressing content that they are not inherently inclined to teach or practice.

Implications

For pharmacy to continue to exist as a profession committed to patient advocacy, educational institutions must find meaningful ways to incorporate professional advocacy into the curriculum. Addressing professional advocacy is no longer an “and/or” option. Our profession is in crisis; we must ensure we are pointing graduates toward a sustainable professional future.

Introduction

Student pharmacists made a considerable contribution to healthcare provision and public health efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, little is known about student pharmacists' experiences working in community pharmacy during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to describe the perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on student pharmacists working in community-based pharmacy settings.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Spring 2023 with student pharmacists enrolled in the Doctor of Pharmacy program at the University of Arizona R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy who also worked at a community pharmacy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Students were asked five core questions with additional probing questions as necessary. Students were also asked to provide three words that described their experience working in community pharmacy through the COVID-19 pandemic. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, then coded by two independent reviewers with differences resolved through consensus.

Results

Eighteen students participated in a semi-structured interview. Four key themes were identified: (1) health and wellness of self and others; (2) education (online didactic and experiential) and work experience; (3) pharmacy workforce; and (4) appreciation and value of the pharmacy profession. The most common words to describe working in community pharmacy through the COVID-19 pandemic were stressful (n = 7) and rewarding (n = 5).

Conclusions

This study offers some insight into the experiences of student pharmacists from one United States school of pharmacy working in community pharmacy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future work is warranted to assess the long-term impact on student pharmacist wellbeing, education, work experience, and appreciation of the profession.

Diagnosis education is explicitly included in the Draft Accreditation Standards 2025 and should be wholeheartedly supported. To address the staggering number of diagnostic errors in the US, the National Academy of Medicine advocates for diagnosis education for all health professions. Misperceptions of pharmacists' involvement in diagnosis are exacerbated by use of implicit language and euphemisms, and it's long overdue that we provide clarity. Pharmacists are engaged in diagnosis and diagnostic reasoning in everyday practice whether realized or not. Diagnosis education is implicitly included in US pharmacy curricula in the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process, and it is time to give students the language to engage in it responsibly to be practice-ready in all states. The explicit inclusion of diagnosis in the Draft Standards 2025 has positive implications for education, practice, and graduates.

Introduction

Medicinal chemistry instruction in PharmD programs at Canadian universities is considered an important foundational science. However, with few guidelines for the required content most programs have observed a decrease in hours of medicinal chemistry instruction. A Medicinal Chemistry Special Interest Group (SIG) was formed to address these issues nationally and initiated a pan-Canadian environmental scan to better understand the depth and breadth of medicinal chemistry instruction.

Methods

The SIG carried out an environmental scan to identify medicinal chemistry content, delivery and assessments in PharmD programs in Canada.

Results

Core medicinal chemistry concepts across the PharmD programs are in general agreement with those listed by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Medicinal chemistry was typically taught as didactic lectures either as a standalone course or within a pharmacology course, although one program integrated some medicinal chemistry within therapeutics focused problem-based learning. There was no consistent time in program where medicinal chemistry occurred.

Conclusions

The SIG found that similar medicinal chemistry content is taught across all Canadian PharmD programs, but incorporation of medicinal chemistry in therapeutics courses was minimal. Core concepts within six high-level overarching themes that guide our collective instruction were identified. The core concepts require developing high-level cognitive processes such as knowledge application and synthesis that practicing pharmacists are expected to possess for entry to practice. We the authors posit that in addition to providing a unique tool for pharmacists to employ in therapeutic decision-making, medicinal chemistry also provides early practice of important problem-solving and critical thinking skills.

Introduction

Podcasts are a popular way to learn and engage at the convenience of the listener. Education is incorporating podcasts to supplement and reinforce students learning inside and outside the classroom.

Methods

The authors created a podcast covering the Top 200 commonly prescribed medications. This was to help students recall and reinforce medication knowledge they typically must learn on their own.

Results

Student performance on post-tests improved (p = 0.0011) compared to pre-tests with an effect size r of 0.39 (0.37, 0.32, and 0.42 for P1, P2 and P3 respectively). Students reported the content was easy to follow, and they enjoyed learning from other students. The total number of plays for the podcast as of 19 July 2023 were 882. Each episode had a range of one to 89 number of plays.

Discussion

The podcast was well received by students, and drug knowledge increased. While the podcasts were shorter in time, they still provided the foundational information for a first-year pharmacy student to know. Overall, podcasts provide another way to help students retain and reinforce material learned inside and outside the classroom.

Background and purpose

This study aimed to assess second year student pharmacists' (P2) confidence in communicating with patients with limited English proficiency before and after a required community-based health screening experience.

Educational activity and setting

All P2s were required to complete a 0.5 credit hour Ambulatory Care Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experience (IPPE). As part of this experience, P2s conducted blood pressure (BP) and blood glucose (BG) screenings with a medical interpreter at a low-income apartment building that has a large Mandarin-speaking population. Each student was required to attend one health screening event. Between September 2022 and April 2023,we administered paper questionnaires to P2s and community members to obtain feedback about the experience. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and paired t-tests while a content analysis was conducted on qualitative data.

Findings

P2s (n = 82, 100%) conducted an average of 5.7 (SD 2.6) BP and 5.9 (SD 2.7) BG screenings per two-hour event. P2s reported higher confidence in conducting assessments, communicating via a medical interpreter, and working on a team at the end of the event. P2s agreed that it should be kept as part of the IPPE (99%). Community members (n = 55, 22%) participated in a bilingual paper-based questionnaire. Community members reported positive experiences and a desire to continue to participate.

Summary

At the end of the health screening event, P2s were more confident in their ability to communicate with older adult community members using translated written documents and verbally with a medical interpreter. P2s and community members supported continuation of the program.