首页 > 最新文献

Human Rights Quarterly最新文献

英文 中文
The War in Court: Inside the Long Fight Against Torture by Lisa Hajjar (review) 《法庭之战:对抗酷刑的长期斗争》作者:丽莎·哈贾尔
3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910496
Rebecca Root
Reviewed by: The War in Court: Inside the Long Fight Against Torture by Lisa Hajjar Rebecca Root (bio) Lisa Hajjar, The War in Court: Inside the Long Fight Against Torture (University of California Press 2022), ISBN 9780520378933, 376 pages. Lisa Hajjar was already an established expert on the sociology of torture when the United States (US) began torturing detainees in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. For over three decades, she has explored the legal, cultural, and ethical issues around torture, interviewed hundreds of lawyers, and witnessed these questions play out in courtrooms around the world. Her research has included more than a dozen trips to Guantánamo Bay. On one level, The War in Court details the relentless efforts of lawyers—both military and civilian—to uphold the rule of law in the face of a US policy endorsing interrogation under torture. Lawyers like those at the Center for Constitutional Rights were focused on the rights of the detainees they were defending, but government-appointed judge advocates general (JAGs) were equally appalled by the establishment of military commissions intended to allow evidence extracted under torture, in contravention to all domestic and international legal norms and obligations. All took issue with the opinions that had been offered by government lawyers to justify the torture that reshaped America's national security policy from 2001 to 2006. In the early chapters, Hajjar deftly walks the reader through the jawdropping revelations of those years: the faulty legal memos, the sickening photographs from Abu Ghraib, the Kafkaesque Guantánamo Bay, the black sites, the waterboarding, walling, force-feeding, and more. Those moments have been seared into the memories of human rights scholars, though perhaps they are fading from public memory or, worse yet, seamlessly incorporated into it. Hajjar reminds us of the key legal victories—from Rasul v. Bush in 2004 to Hamdan v. Rumsfeld in 2006 to Boumediene v. Bush in 2008—but also of the many failed arguments lawyers advanced in these years. Her sociological training leads her to explore the community of lawyers who came together to wage controversial struggles over many years, enduring constant delays and setbacks, but always working for the rule of law and reaffirming one another's sense of the duty to uphold it. While scholars, detainees, and human rights non-governmental organizations played crucial roles as well, it is the lawyers who are at the heart of this analysis. Though American courts failed to hold the perpetrators of these crimes accountable, departing from the trends in Europe and Latin America, the lawyers in these cases were able to use even the cases they lost to forge new legal bulwarks in favor of detainees' rights. Hundreds of Gitmo detainees were released without charge, and despite the government's extensive efforts to keep secret [End Page 733] the details of detainee mistreatment, the truth came out. But juxtap
莉萨·哈贾尔,《法庭上的战争:反对酷刑的长期斗争》(加州大学出版社2022),ISBN 9780520378933, 376页。当美国为应对2001年9月11日的恐怖袭击而开始折磨被拘留者时,丽莎·哈贾尔已经是酷刑社会学方面的知名专家。三十多年来,她一直在探索与酷刑有关的法律、文化和道德问题,采访了数百名律师,并目睹了这些问题在世界各地的法庭上上演。她的研究包括十几次访问Guantánamo Bay。在一个层面上,《法庭上的战争》详细描述了军队和平民律师在面对美国支持酷刑审讯的政策时坚持法治的不懈努力。宪法权利中心(Center for Constitutional Rights)的律师们关注的是他们所辩护的被拘留者的权利,但政府任命的总辩护法官(JAGs)同样对军事委员会的设立感到震惊,该委员会旨在允许通过酷刑提取证据,这违反了所有国内和国际法律规范和义务。所有人都对政府律师为2001年至2006年重塑美国国家安全政策的酷刑辩护的观点提出异议。在书的前几章,哈贾尔巧妙地带领读者回顾了那些年令人瞠目结舌的揭露:错误的法律备忘录、阿布格莱布监狱(Abu Ghraib)令人作呕的照片、卡夫卡式的Guantánamo海湾、黑牢、水刑、隔离墙、强迫喂食等等。这些时刻已经烙进了人权学者的记忆,尽管它们可能正在淡出公众的记忆,或者更糟的是,被无缝地纳入了公众的记忆。哈贾尔让我们想起了关键的法律胜利——从2004年的拉苏尔诉布什案到2006年的哈姆丹诉拉姆斯菲尔德案,再到2008年的布米丁诉布什案——但也想起了这些年来律师们提出的许多失败的论点。她的社会学训练使她探索了律师群体,他们多年来聚集在一起进行有争议的斗争,忍受着不断的延误和挫折,但始终为法治而努力,并重申了彼此维护法治的责任。虽然学者、被拘留者和人权非政府组织也发挥了关键作用,但律师才是这一分析的核心。尽管与欧洲和拉丁美洲的趋势不同,美国法院未能追究这些罪行的肇事者的责任,但这些案件中的律师甚至能够利用他们输掉的案件来建立新的法律堡垒,以维护被拘留者的权利。数百名关塔那摩囚犯在没有受到指控的情况下被释放,尽管政府竭尽全力对虐待囚犯的细节保密,但真相还是大白了。但与重建反酷刑法律规范的故事并列的是第二个更悲惨的故事。布什(Bush)和奥巴马(Obama)政府试图将被披露的虐待囚犯事件对美国声誉造成的损害降到最低,因此他们改变了政策,用无人机袭击取代了对恐怖分子嫌疑人的拘留。在与美国没有交战的国家杀害数千名恐怖分子嫌疑人,至少引发了与酷刑一样多的道德和法律问题,但未能引起同样程度的公愤或司法支持。关于奥巴马政府的章节尤其引人注目,因为哈贾尔详细描述了奥巴马反对军事委员会的强硬立场和关闭Guantánamo湾的承诺是如何很快失败的。因为Guantánamo有这么多人遭受过酷刑,奥巴马面临着一个令人不安的困境:接受使用酷刑使对被拘留者的公平审判变得不可能,并将他们释放,或者允许新的军事委员会继续起诉。美国政府选择了后者。作为候选人,奥巴马曾承诺要追究虐待者和使他们承担责任的政策制定者的责任。作为总统,他决定“向前看,而不是向后看”。事实上,揭露美国人在反恐战争中所犯罪行的举报人受到了更为严厉的追捕……
{"title":"The War in Court: Inside the Long Fight Against Torture by Lisa Hajjar (review)","authors":"Rebecca Root","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910496","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910496","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: The War in Court: Inside the Long Fight Against Torture by Lisa Hajjar Rebecca Root (bio) Lisa Hajjar, The War in Court: Inside the Long Fight Against Torture (University of California Press 2022), ISBN 9780520378933, 376 pages. Lisa Hajjar was already an established expert on the sociology of torture when the United States (US) began torturing detainees in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. For over three decades, she has explored the legal, cultural, and ethical issues around torture, interviewed hundreds of lawyers, and witnessed these questions play out in courtrooms around the world. Her research has included more than a dozen trips to Guantánamo Bay. On one level, The War in Court details the relentless efforts of lawyers—both military and civilian—to uphold the rule of law in the face of a US policy endorsing interrogation under torture. Lawyers like those at the Center for Constitutional Rights were focused on the rights of the detainees they were defending, but government-appointed judge advocates general (JAGs) were equally appalled by the establishment of military commissions intended to allow evidence extracted under torture, in contravention to all domestic and international legal norms and obligations. All took issue with the opinions that had been offered by government lawyers to justify the torture that reshaped America's national security policy from 2001 to 2006. In the early chapters, Hajjar deftly walks the reader through the jawdropping revelations of those years: the faulty legal memos, the sickening photographs from Abu Ghraib, the Kafkaesque Guantánamo Bay, the black sites, the waterboarding, walling, force-feeding, and more. Those moments have been seared into the memories of human rights scholars, though perhaps they are fading from public memory or, worse yet, seamlessly incorporated into it. Hajjar reminds us of the key legal victories—from Rasul v. Bush in 2004 to Hamdan v. Rumsfeld in 2006 to Boumediene v. Bush in 2008—but also of the many failed arguments lawyers advanced in these years. Her sociological training leads her to explore the community of lawyers who came together to wage controversial struggles over many years, enduring constant delays and setbacks, but always working for the rule of law and reaffirming one another's sense of the duty to uphold it. While scholars, detainees, and human rights non-governmental organizations played crucial roles as well, it is the lawyers who are at the heart of this analysis. Though American courts failed to hold the perpetrators of these crimes accountable, departing from the trends in Europe and Latin America, the lawyers in these cases were able to use even the cases they lost to forge new legal bulwarks in favor of detainees' rights. Hundreds of Gitmo detainees were released without charge, and despite the government's extensive efforts to keep secret [End Page 733] the details of detainee mistreatment, the truth came out. But juxtap","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"87 1-2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contributors 贡献者
3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910500
{"title":"Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910500","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910500","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"84 3-4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mass Graves, Truth and Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Investigation of Mass Graves eds. by Ellie Smith & Melanie Klinker (review) 万人坑、真相与正义:万人坑调查的跨学科视角。艾丽·史密斯&;梅勒妮·克林克(评论)
3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910498
Eric Stover
Reviewed by: Mass Graves, Truth and Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Investigation of Mass Graves eds. by Ellie Smith & Melanie Klinker Eric Stover (bio) Ellie Smith & Melanie Klinker eds., Mass Graves, Truth and Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Investigation of Mass Graves (Edward Elgar Publishing 2023), ISBN 9781800882379, 186 pages. Ellie Smith and Melanie Klinker, a researcher and law professor respectively at Bournemouth University, have edited an excellent volume on how forensic scientists, judges, and court investigations have conducted mass grave investigations and interacted with families of the disappeared since the early 1980s. The volume offers an interdisciplinary examination of all states of a mass graves investigation from discovery of a site to the process of investigation and the conduct of commemoration activities.1 As someone who has been a participant or close observer of forensic investigations of mass graves in Argentina, Guatemala, Rwanda, Iraq, the former Yugoslavia, and the United States, I admire the care that the editors and authors have taken not to oversimplify what can be a highly complex investigatory process from a legal, forensic, and psycho-social perspective. Forty years ago, my colleague forensic anthropologist Clyde Snow advocated that the search for the disappeared must be conducted for three reasons: to locate, identify, and return the remains of the disappeared to family members [End Page 739] for proper burial; to gather evidence to hold perpetrators accountable; and to set the historical record straight. While Snow's objectives still hold true today, it must also be recognized that the quest to equate truth to identification and justice to perpetrator accountability can be both distinctive and challenging. As the book's editors, Smith and Klinker—who also are co-authors of the 2020 Bournemouth Protocol on Mass Grave Protection and Investigations—caution there is no such thing as a "standard" or "typical" mass grave.2 Each site is "highly context-specific" and "the way in which sites are handled will necessarily vary accordingly."3 So, what are the factors that can determine how a mass grave site will be located and investigated? To begin with, perpetrators often make every effort to hide mass graves, and with the passage of time, vegetation can spread and make locating the sites even more difficult. Access to mass graves can also be delayed during and after armed conflicts. For example, during our investigations of mass graves in the former Yugoslavia in the early 1990s, Snow and I were accompanied by United Nations deminers to sweep potential mass grave sites for explosive ordnance, including bobby traps and landmines. (This practice became a standard operating procedure during the mass graves investigations in the former Yugoslavia for years to come.) On one occasion Serb forces expelled our team, comprised of forensic scientists from around the world, from a mass grave in ea
《万人坑、真相与正义:万人坑调查的跨学科视角》。埃莉·史密斯和梅勒妮·克林克编辑。,《万人坑,真相与正义:万人坑调查的跨学科视角》(Edward Elgar Publishing 2023), ISBN 9781800882379, 186页。伯恩茅斯大学(Bournemouth University)的研究员埃莉·史密斯(Ellie Smith)和法学教授梅勒妮·克林克(Melanie Klinker)分别编辑了一本出色的书,讲述了自20世纪80年代初以来,法医科学家、法官和法庭调查人员如何进行万人坑调查,以及如何与失踪者家属进行互动。本书对万人坑调查的所有状态进行了跨学科的审查,从发现一个地点到调查过程和纪念活动的进行作为对阿根廷、危地马拉、卢旺达、伊拉克、前南斯拉夫和美国的万人坑的法医调查的参与者或密切观察者,我很钦佩编辑和作者的谨慎,他们没有从法律、法医和心理社会的角度过分简化这个可能非常复杂的调查过程。四十年前,我的同事、法医人类学家克莱德·斯诺(Clyde Snow)主张,寻找失踪者的工作必须进行,原因有三:找到、识别失踪者的遗体,并将其归还给家人,以便妥善埋葬;收集证据,追究肇事者的责任;为了澄清历史记录。虽然斯诺的目标在今天仍然适用,但我们也必须认识到,将真相等同于身份,将正义等同于肇事者责任的追求既独特又具有挑战性。作为这本书的编辑,史密斯和克林克——他们也是2020年《伯恩茅斯万人坑保护和调查议定书》的共同作者——警告说,没有“标准”或“典型”万人坑每个站点都是“高度特定于上下文的”,“处理站点的方式必然会相应变化”。那么,决定万人坑选址和调查方式的因素是什么呢?首先,作恶者经常千方百计地隐藏万人坑,随着时间的推移,植被会蔓延,使找到万人坑的地点变得更加困难。在武装冲突期间和之后,进入万人坑的时间也可能被推迟。例如,在上世纪90年代初我们对前南斯拉夫的万人坑进行调查时,斯诺和我在联合国排雷人员的陪同下,扫除了可能存在的万人坑地点的爆炸物,包括炸弹陷阱和地雷。(这种做法后来成为前南斯拉夫万人坑调查的标准操作程序。)有一次,塞尔维亚军队将我们的团队从克罗地亚东部的一个万人坑中驱逐出去,尽管我们是在联合国的授权下工作的。我们的团队由来自世界各地的法医组成。即使和平到来,一些武装派别也会尽其所能阻止人们进入或隐藏乱葬坑。正如伊恩·汉森(Ian Hanson)在其关于1997年至2016年在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那科兹卢克镇附近挖掘万人坑的章节中指出的那样,法医调查人员发现证据表明,波斯尼亚塞族部队使用重型机械从一个或多个地点(主要坟墓)移走并重新放置尸体,并将其重新埋葬在另一个地方(次要坟墓),这似乎是为了掩盖1995年7月斯雷布雷尼察大屠杀期间的大规模处决。考古和DNA证据将一级和二级坟墓联系起来,后来在前南斯拉夫国际刑事法庭的战争罪审判中作为证据提出。4尽管人们努力隐藏万人坑,但国际刑事法庭的法官霍华德·莫里森(Howard Morrison)在接受该书编辑的采访时表示,万人坑的存在本身就具有“强烈的提高认识的作用”。他说:“当(罪犯)挖万人坑时,他们(这样做)是为了隐藏尸体,而不是为了唤起人们的意识。但持久的影响是,它同时也提高了人们的意识。对万人坑的法医调查也需要大量的国家和国际资源,以及稳定的政府和司法机构来监督这些行动。这是特别……
{"title":"Mass Graves, Truth and Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Investigation of Mass Graves eds. by Ellie Smith & Melanie Klinker (review)","authors":"Eric Stover","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910498","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910498","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Mass Graves, Truth and Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Investigation of Mass Graves eds. by Ellie Smith & Melanie Klinker Eric Stover (bio) Ellie Smith & Melanie Klinker eds., Mass Graves, Truth and Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Investigation of Mass Graves (Edward Elgar Publishing 2023), ISBN 9781800882379, 186 pages. Ellie Smith and Melanie Klinker, a researcher and law professor respectively at Bournemouth University, have edited an excellent volume on how forensic scientists, judges, and court investigations have conducted mass grave investigations and interacted with families of the disappeared since the early 1980s. The volume offers an interdisciplinary examination of all states of a mass graves investigation from discovery of a site to the process of investigation and the conduct of commemoration activities.1 As someone who has been a participant or close observer of forensic investigations of mass graves in Argentina, Guatemala, Rwanda, Iraq, the former Yugoslavia, and the United States, I admire the care that the editors and authors have taken not to oversimplify what can be a highly complex investigatory process from a legal, forensic, and psycho-social perspective. Forty years ago, my colleague forensic anthropologist Clyde Snow advocated that the search for the disappeared must be conducted for three reasons: to locate, identify, and return the remains of the disappeared to family members [End Page 739] for proper burial; to gather evidence to hold perpetrators accountable; and to set the historical record straight. While Snow's objectives still hold true today, it must also be recognized that the quest to equate truth to identification and justice to perpetrator accountability can be both distinctive and challenging. As the book's editors, Smith and Klinker—who also are co-authors of the 2020 Bournemouth Protocol on Mass Grave Protection and Investigations—caution there is no such thing as a \"standard\" or \"typical\" mass grave.2 Each site is \"highly context-specific\" and \"the way in which sites are handled will necessarily vary accordingly.\"3 So, what are the factors that can determine how a mass grave site will be located and investigated? To begin with, perpetrators often make every effort to hide mass graves, and with the passage of time, vegetation can spread and make locating the sites even more difficult. Access to mass graves can also be delayed during and after armed conflicts. For example, during our investigations of mass graves in the former Yugoslavia in the early 1990s, Snow and I were accompanied by United Nations deminers to sweep potential mass grave sites for explosive ordnance, including bobby traps and landmines. (This practice became a standard operating procedure during the mass graves investigations in the former Yugoslavia for years to come.) On one occasion Serb forces expelled our team, comprised of forensic scientists from around the world, from a mass grave in ea","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"86 7-8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Human Rights, Remedy, and Everyday Geographies of Injustice: Perspectives from a Participatory Action Research Project 人权、救济和不公正的日常地理:参与性行动研究项目的视角
3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910489
Jean Connolly Carmalt
ABSTRACT: This article contributes to literature on economic and social rights by examining how everyday places and spaces translate structural inequalities into individualized violations of international norms. Drawing on data from a participatory action research project in New York called The Legal Disruption Project (LDP), it argues for new models of knowledge production that bridge gaps between the experiences of marginalized populations and human rights practitioners. The LDP demonstrates how centering the voices of affected communities can contribute substantive insights to effective remedies for human rights violations. In particular, the article suggests potential for explicitly spatial remedies defined through participatory processes of community engagement.
摘要:本文通过研究日常场所和空间如何将结构性不平等转化为个体化的违反国际规范的行为,为经济和社会权利研究贡献了文献。根据纽约一个名为“法律干扰项目”(LDP)的参与性行动研究项目的数据,报告主张建立新的知识生产模式,弥合边缘化人群和人权实践者之间的经验差距。自民党表明,集中受影响社区的声音可以为有效补救侵犯人权行为提供实质性见解。文章特别提出了通过社区参与进程明确界定空间补救措施的潜力。
{"title":"Human Rights, Remedy, and Everyday Geographies of Injustice: Perspectives from a Participatory Action Research Project","authors":"Jean Connolly Carmalt","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910489","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910489","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: This article contributes to literature on economic and social rights by examining how everyday places and spaces translate structural inequalities into individualized violations of international norms. Drawing on data from a participatory action research project in New York called The Legal Disruption Project (LDP), it argues for new models of knowledge production that bridge gaps between the experiences of marginalized populations and human rights practitioners. The LDP demonstrates how centering the voices of affected communities can contribute substantive insights to effective remedies for human rights violations. In particular, the article suggests potential for explicitly spatial remedies defined through participatory processes of community engagement.","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"86 1-4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
International Human Rights Law and Destitution: An Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Perspective by Luke D. Graham (review) 国际人权法与贫困:经济、社会和文化权利视角Luke D. Graham(书评)
3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910494
Muneeb Khan, Yen-Chiang Chang
Reviewed by: International Human Rights Law and Destitution: An Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Perspective by Luke D. Graham Muneeb Khan (bio) and Yen-Chiang Chang (bio) Luke D. Graham, International Human Rights Law and Destitution: An Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Perspective (Routledge 2022) ISBN: 9781032074726, 192 pages. The issue of destitution has long been a concern for anti-poverty advocates, policy-makers, and researchers. While there is a general understanding of the experience of destitution, there has been a lack of attention given to its relationship with the denial of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ESCR). The book International Human Rights Law and Destitution: An Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Perspective, authored by Luke D. Graham, explores destitution from a human rights-based perspective, specifically focusing on ESCR. The book provides a novel understanding and definition of destitution based on the realization of ESCR, highlighting the nexus between destitution and the denial of these rights. The book applies this definition to a United Kingdom (UK) case study to demonstrate how destitution manifests and provides recommendations for addressing destitution through the realization of these rights. The book comprises six chapters, with each chapter providing an in-depth analysis of different aspects of destitution through the application of a multidisciplinary legal research methodology. Chapter 1 establishes the context by introducing the concept of destitution and highlighting its distinctions from poverty and extreme poverty. The author emphasizes the importance of an ESCR perspective and offers an outline of the book's structure. The chapter examines human rights-based definitions of poverty and extreme poverty, underscoring the absence of a similar definition for destitution. It argues that destitution entails meeting basic needs independently, without relying on charity, and posits that destitution is separate from poverty and extreme poverty. This initial chapter serves as a strong foundation, effectively introducing key concepts and themes, while presenting a fresh definition of destitution within the framework of human rights. The author's meticulous research and insightful analysis contribute to a novel perspective in the realm of human rights. Chapter 2 delves into the foundational concepts that determine the necessary level of rights realization to prevent destitution. The author argues that this level is shaped by three key ideas: firstly, reliance on charitable assistance hinders meeting the destitution threshold; secondly, destitution can arise even if only one component right falls short of the destitution threshold; and finally, the destitution threshold encompasses a universal minimum component while also requiring context-specific determinations. Although the chapter effectively underscores the importance of a human rights-based approach to address destitution, the author could furt
《国际人权法与贫困:经济、社会和文化权利的视角》,作者:Luke D. Graham,《国际人权法与贫困:经济、社会和文化权利的视角》(Routledge出版社,2022),ISBN: 9781032074726, 192页。长期以来,贫困问题一直是反贫困倡导者、政策制定者和研究人员关注的问题。虽然对贫困的经历有一般的了解,但对其与剥夺经济、社会和文化权利的关系却缺乏注意。Luke D. Graham撰写的《国际人权法与贫困:经济、社会和文化权利视角》一书从基于人权的角度探讨了贫困问题,特别关注了经济、社会和文化权利。这本书在实现经济、社会和文化权利的基础上提供了对贫困的全新理解和定义,强调了贫困与剥夺这些权利之间的联系。本书将这一定义应用于英国的一个案例研究,以展示贫困是如何体现的,并提供了通过实现这些权利来解决贫困的建议。本书包括六章,每章通过应用多学科法律研究方法对贫困的不同方面进行深入分析。第一章通过介绍贫困的概念并强调其与贫困和极端贫困的区别来建立背景。作者强调了ESCR视角的重要性,并提供了本书结构的大纲。本章审查了基于人权的贫困和极端贫困的定义,强调缺乏对贫困的类似定义。它认为,贫困需要独立满足基本需求,而不依赖慈善,并假设贫困与贫困和极端贫困是分开的。这第一章是一个坚实的基础,有效地介绍了关键概念和主题,同时在人权框架内提出了贫困的新定义。作者细致的研究和深刻的分析为人权领域提供了全新的视角。第二章探讨了确定权利实现的必要水平以防止贫困的基本概念。作者认为,这一水平是由三个关键思想形成的:第一,对慈善援助的依赖阻碍了达到贫困门槛;第二,即使只有一项组成权利达不到贫困门槛,也会产生贫困;最后,贫困门槛包括一个普遍的最低组成部分,同时也需要具体情况的确定。虽然本章有效地强调了以人权为基础的方法解决贫困问题的重要性,但作者可以通过纳入案例研究来进一步加强讨论,以说明三个关键思想。第三章错综复杂地探讨了贫困门槛框架,细致地考察了每个单独的组成部分权利。通过将贫困门槛应用于每一项权利,出现了一种普遍适用的对贫困的理解,这种理解植根于与每一项具体权利相关的最低核心义务。分析超出了最低限度的核心义务,深入探讨了这些权利所固有的更广泛的规范本质。这一全面的探索为每一项组成权利确立了具体情况下的贫困门槛,有助于对贫困进行基于人权的定义,而不仅仅是权利没有实现。但是,如果在人权框架内纳入贫穷和极端贫穷的现有定义,并探讨权利的有形性理论及其与组成部分权利的联系,最终加强解决与贫困有关的问题,讨论本来可以进一步丰富。第四章深入探讨了紧缩问题及其与英国日益加剧的贫困之间的关系。研究了紧缩对社会保障政策的深远影响,并将与社会保障有关的因素确定为贫困的主要催化剂。作者细致地评估了过去十年社会保障政策的转变及其累积后果,最终得出结论:英国的紧缩政策本质上延续了贫困。本章全面分析了紧缩对英国贫困的影响,强调了以人权为中心的社会政策方法的必要性。作者对紧缩、贫困和慈善服务优先于……的审查和批评。
{"title":"International Human Rights Law and Destitution: An Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Perspective by Luke D. Graham (review)","authors":"Muneeb Khan, Yen-Chiang Chang","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910494","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910494","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: International Human Rights Law and Destitution: An Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Perspective by Luke D. Graham Muneeb Khan (bio) and Yen-Chiang Chang (bio) Luke D. Graham, International Human Rights Law and Destitution: An Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Perspective (Routledge 2022) ISBN: 9781032074726, 192 pages. The issue of destitution has long been a concern for anti-poverty advocates, policy-makers, and researchers. While there is a general understanding of the experience of destitution, there has been a lack of attention given to its relationship with the denial of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ESCR). The book International Human Rights Law and Destitution: An Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Perspective, authored by Luke D. Graham, explores destitution from a human rights-based perspective, specifically focusing on ESCR. The book provides a novel understanding and definition of destitution based on the realization of ESCR, highlighting the nexus between destitution and the denial of these rights. The book applies this definition to a United Kingdom (UK) case study to demonstrate how destitution manifests and provides recommendations for addressing destitution through the realization of these rights. The book comprises six chapters, with each chapter providing an in-depth analysis of different aspects of destitution through the application of a multidisciplinary legal research methodology. Chapter 1 establishes the context by introducing the concept of destitution and highlighting its distinctions from poverty and extreme poverty. The author emphasizes the importance of an ESCR perspective and offers an outline of the book's structure. The chapter examines human rights-based definitions of poverty and extreme poverty, underscoring the absence of a similar definition for destitution. It argues that destitution entails meeting basic needs independently, without relying on charity, and posits that destitution is separate from poverty and extreme poverty. This initial chapter serves as a strong foundation, effectively introducing key concepts and themes, while presenting a fresh definition of destitution within the framework of human rights. The author's meticulous research and insightful analysis contribute to a novel perspective in the realm of human rights. Chapter 2 delves into the foundational concepts that determine the necessary level of rights realization to prevent destitution. The author argues that this level is shaped by three key ideas: firstly, reliance on charitable assistance hinders meeting the destitution threshold; secondly, destitution can arise even if only one component right falls short of the destitution threshold; and finally, the destitution threshold encompasses a universal minimum component while also requiring context-specific determinations. Although the chapter effectively underscores the importance of a human rights-based approach to address destitution, the author could furt","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"85 5-6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Suffering and Survival: The Experience of Dutch Women in Japanese Internment Camps in Java, 1941–45 苦难与生存:1941 - 1945年在爪哇日本拘留营中的荷兰妇女的经历
3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910492
Mia Jeronimus
ABSTRACT: The case of Dutch women imprisoned in Japanese internment camps in Java, 1941-45, is a little known chapter within the well-known context of the Second World War. This article deciphers the possibilities of their experience by examining two temporally distinct sets of sources from the women's perspectives. The first comprises a series of ego-documents and interviews written during the war and just after it, and the second is a collection of sources from the 1990s onwards, in the form of memoir, oral history, and children's testimonies spoken in front of the Japanese Embassy in The Hague in 2005. In the spaces and inconsistencies between these two sets of testimony a diverse and complex picture of female experience is found across three predominant themes: motherhood, female community, and sexual assault. Each section is an insight into how agency is sought when agency is denied, how the women held themselves, organized themselves, and supported and fought against one another within a regime indifferent to whether they lived or died.
摘要:1941年至1945年期间,荷兰妇女被关押在爪哇岛的日本集中营,这是二战中鲜为人知的一段历史。本文通过从女性的角度考察两组不同的时间来源,来解读她们经历的可能性。第一部分包括一系列在战争期间和战后写的自我文件和采访,第二部分是1990年代以来的资料收集,以回忆录、口述历史和2005年在海牙日本大使馆前发表的儿童证词的形式。在这两组证词之间的空间和矛盾中,我们发现了一幅多样而复杂的女性经历图景,涉及三个主要主题:母性、女性社区和性侵犯。每一部分都是对权力被剥夺时如何寻求权力的洞察,女性如何在一个对她们的生死漠不关心的政权中保持自己,组织自己,相互支持和相互斗争。
{"title":"Suffering and Survival: The Experience of Dutch Women in Japanese Internment Camps in Java, 1941–45","authors":"Mia Jeronimus","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910492","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910492","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: The case of Dutch women imprisoned in Japanese internment camps in Java, 1941-45, is a little known chapter within the well-known context of the Second World War. This article deciphers the possibilities of their experience by examining two temporally distinct sets of sources from the women's perspectives. The first comprises a series of ego-documents and interviews written during the war and just after it, and the second is a collection of sources from the 1990s onwards, in the form of memoir, oral history, and children's testimonies spoken in front of the Japanese Embassy in The Hague in 2005. In the spaces and inconsistencies between these two sets of testimony a diverse and complex picture of female experience is found across three predominant themes: motherhood, female community, and sexual assault. Each section is an insight into how agency is sought when agency is denied, how the women held themselves, organized themselves, and supported and fought against one another within a regime indifferent to whether they lived or died.","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"85 11-12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Border Humanitarians: Gendered Order and Insecurity on the Thai-Burmese Frontier by Adam P. Saltsman (review) 《边境人道主义:泰缅边境的性别秩序与不安全》亚当·p·萨尔茨曼著(书评)
3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910497
Don Selby
Reviewed by: Border Humanitarians: Gendered Order and Insecurity on the Thai-Burmese Frontier by Adam P. Saltsman Don Selby (bio) Adam P. Saltsman, Border Humanitarians: Gendered Order and Insecurity on the Thai-Burmese Frontier (Syracuse University Press 2022), ISBN 9780815637639, 288 pages. Adam P. Saltsman's Border Humanitarians is a welcome addition to scholarship that takes both a critical and ethnographic approach to understanding humanitarian practices. The research underpinning this work extended for the better part of a decade, and Saltsman conducted a significant portion of it while working with an international humanitarian organization in the border province of Mae Sot, Thailand. Consisting of five chapters, plus its introduction and conclusion, it explores the work of humanitarian [End Page 734] work on gender-based violence among Burmese migrants in Mae Sot. A stage-setting introduction describes the area along the Moei River where migration into Mae Sot occurs, the labor camps and makeshift communities that have arisen there, and the variegated migrant neighborhoods, communities, and congregations that live in the area. It also sets out the book's theoretical ambitions: Border Humanitarians brings together the threads of geographic theorizing on bordering and borderscapes and scholarship on performativity, political subjectivity, and positionality in relation to gender and gender violence in contexts of dispossession in the deployment of the idea of gendered positionalities.1 In addition, Saltsman argues for the methodological value of reflexive ethnography, and of close attention to the ordering force of discourse at sites of humanitarian intervention. The second chapter provides the political-economic history (both colonial and post-colonial) shaping the emergence of borders, and of labor migration with respect to these borders. Borderlands, and the sorts of exploitation and politicaleconomic possibility they provide are not simply given, here, but are produced by capital flows and the history of political maneuvering among colonial powers. In chapter three the voices of Burmese migrants make their appearance. Participant observation seems to have been impossible in work camps and the precarious, make-shift neighborhoods cobbled together by Burmese migrants, leaving a certain ethnographic depth unrealizable. Interviews with migrants, however, were possible and do important work to develop a picture of migrants' palpable insecurity and constraint in Thailand, and how the immediacy of their vulnerability contributes to the circulation of "conservative notions of home and culture" among Burmese in Mae Sot.2 These notions play an important role in perpetuating conservative understandings of femininity and masculinity, which feed, in their turn, gender-based violence among Burmese migrants. As Saltsman explains it, this chapter: centered on how precarious work, the challenges of displacement, and gender traditions intersect in a mutua
Adam P. Saltsman,《边境人道主义者:泰缅边境的性别秩序和不安全》(Syracuse University Press 2022), ISBN 9780815637639, 288页。Adam P. Saltsman的《边境人道主义者》是一个受欢迎的学术补充,它采用批判和民族志的方法来理解人道主义实践。支撑这项工作的研究持续了近十年的时间,Saltsman在泰国边境省份湄索(Mae Sot)与一个国际人道主义组织合作时进行了相当大的一部分研究。本书由五章组成,再加上引言和结语,探讨了湄索缅甸移民中基于性别的暴力的人道主义工作。舞台布景介绍了茂依河沿岸移民进入美索的地区,在那里出现的劳改营和临时社区,以及居住在该地区的各种移民社区、社区和会众。它还阐述了本书的理论抱负:《边境人道主义者》汇集了边界和边界景观的地理理论线索,以及在部署性别地位观念的剥夺背景下与性别和性别暴力有关的表演性、政治主体性和位置性的学术研究此外,Saltsman还论证了反思性民族志的方法论价值,以及对人道主义干预现场话语秩序力量的密切关注。第二章提供了政治经济史(包括殖民时期和后殖民时期)对边界产生的影响,以及与这些边界相关的劳动力迁移。《边疆》,以及它们所提供的各种剥削和政治经济可能性,在这里不是简单地给定的,而是由资本流动和殖民大国之间的政治操纵历史所产生的。第三章,缅甸移民的声音出现了。在工作营地和由缅甸移民拼凑而成的不稳定的临时社区中,参与者的观察似乎是不可能的,这使得某种民族志的深度无法实现。然而,对移民的采访是可能的,并且做了重要的工作,以发展移民在泰国明显的不安全感和限制的画面,以及他们的脆弱性如何直接促成梅梭缅甸人中“家庭和文化的保守观念”的传播。2这些观念在延续对女性和男性气质的保守理解方面发挥了重要作用,反过来又助长了缅甸移民中的性别暴力。正如Saltsman所解释的那样,这一章的重点是:不稳定的工作、流离失所的挑战和性别传统如何在缅甸移民的家庭和社区空间中以一种相互构成的方式相交,而不是在工厂车间或田地里。移徙者关于工作场所外暴力的叙述为考虑经济生产和剥夺如何渗透到他们社会生活的各个方面提供了一个重要的角度第四章标志着向一种更接近于民族志实地工作的研究形式的转变。在这一章中,Saltsman提出了他第一个关于反思性方法论的持续案例,因为这一实地工作的地点是他工作的全球北方人道主义组织。作为贯穿本章的反身性的要素,他强调了其他几个关键的分析概念,包括位置性、表演性、知识建构、性别话语的生产和流通以及集合。这一章关注的是“人道主义及其逻辑在表演上的再现和主张”的方式。这包括,首先他自己作为研究负责人的地位,他必须以捐助者和非政府组织主管能够理解的方式描述研究小组的发现。其次是一名美国援助工作者对性别暴力的定义的愤怒断言,这似乎是从世界卫生组织(World Health Organization)关于这一主题的文献中撕下来的,这不仅导致了克伦人、缅甸人和泰国人之间的讨论被关闭,而且引发了Saltsman本人对她的干预的一种监督。最后,研究小组使用专业化、抽象的语言来描述他们的移民对话者之间的暴力行为。通过这些焦点,他看到话语是如何产生的……
{"title":"Border Humanitarians: Gendered Order and Insecurity on the Thai-Burmese Frontier by Adam P. Saltsman (review)","authors":"Don Selby","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910497","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910497","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Border Humanitarians: Gendered Order and Insecurity on the Thai-Burmese Frontier by Adam P. Saltsman Don Selby (bio) Adam P. Saltsman, Border Humanitarians: Gendered Order and Insecurity on the Thai-Burmese Frontier (Syracuse University Press 2022), ISBN 9780815637639, 288 pages. Adam P. Saltsman's Border Humanitarians is a welcome addition to scholarship that takes both a critical and ethnographic approach to understanding humanitarian practices. The research underpinning this work extended for the better part of a decade, and Saltsman conducted a significant portion of it while working with an international humanitarian organization in the border province of Mae Sot, Thailand. Consisting of five chapters, plus its introduction and conclusion, it explores the work of humanitarian [End Page 734] work on gender-based violence among Burmese migrants in Mae Sot. A stage-setting introduction describes the area along the Moei River where migration into Mae Sot occurs, the labor camps and makeshift communities that have arisen there, and the variegated migrant neighborhoods, communities, and congregations that live in the area. It also sets out the book's theoretical ambitions: Border Humanitarians brings together the threads of geographic theorizing on bordering and borderscapes and scholarship on performativity, political subjectivity, and positionality in relation to gender and gender violence in contexts of dispossession in the deployment of the idea of gendered positionalities.1 In addition, Saltsman argues for the methodological value of reflexive ethnography, and of close attention to the ordering force of discourse at sites of humanitarian intervention. The second chapter provides the political-economic history (both colonial and post-colonial) shaping the emergence of borders, and of labor migration with respect to these borders. Borderlands, and the sorts of exploitation and politicaleconomic possibility they provide are not simply given, here, but are produced by capital flows and the history of political maneuvering among colonial powers. In chapter three the voices of Burmese migrants make their appearance. Participant observation seems to have been impossible in work camps and the precarious, make-shift neighborhoods cobbled together by Burmese migrants, leaving a certain ethnographic depth unrealizable. Interviews with migrants, however, were possible and do important work to develop a picture of migrants' palpable insecurity and constraint in Thailand, and how the immediacy of their vulnerability contributes to the circulation of \"conservative notions of home and culture\" among Burmese in Mae Sot.2 These notions play an important role in perpetuating conservative understandings of femininity and masculinity, which feed, in their turn, gender-based violence among Burmese migrants. As Saltsman explains it, this chapter: centered on how precarious work, the challenges of displacement, and gender traditions intersect in a mutua","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"84 6-7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Revival of Human Rights: A New Perspective on Human Rights Through the Lens of Disability 人权的复兴:残障视角下的人权新视角
3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910491
Gauthier de Beco
ABSTRACT: This article argues that adopting the lens of disability may provide a way forward for the revival of human rights. It shows how it is disability that draws attention to resource deprivation that hampers the enjoyment of human rights. It does so by focusing on two novel aspects of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD): the general principle of participation and the adoption of a rights-based approach to dealing with disability. To illustrate this view, it uses as example the impact the restrictions have had on disabled people during the Covid-19 pandemic.
摘要:本文认为,从残障的角度出发,或许可以为人权的复兴提供一条出路。它表明,正是残疾使人们注意到妨碍享有人权的资源剥夺。为此,它将重点放在《残疾人权利公约》的两个新方面:参与的一般原则和采用基于权利的方法来处理残疾问题。为了说明这一观点,报告以新冠肺炎大流行期间限制措施对残疾人的影响为例。
{"title":"The Revival of Human Rights: A New Perspective on Human Rights Through the Lens of Disability","authors":"Gauthier de Beco","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910491","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910491","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: This article argues that adopting the lens of disability may provide a way forward for the revival of human rights. It shows how it is disability that draws attention to resource deprivation that hampers the enjoyment of human rights. It does so by focusing on two novel aspects of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD): the general principle of participation and the adoption of a rights-based approach to dealing with disability. To illustrate this view, it uses as example the impact the restrictions have had on disabled people during the Covid-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"82 11-12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
P.C. Chang and Charles Malik: The Two Philosophers of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 张正昌和马利克:《世界人权宣言》的两位哲学家
3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910487
Hans Ingvar Roth
ABSTRACT: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was the result of almost two years of work from several participants and organizations before its adoption in the United Nations on December 10, 1948. The Declaration is one of the world's most famous and translated documents even though its principles and moral insights are far from realized around the world today. Although it was a collaborative work with many authors involved, some writers played significant roles in a special way. This article aims to present and analyze the contributions of two of the main drafters, namely the philosopher and diplomat Charles Malik (1906-1987) from Lebanon and the philosopher and diplomat P.C. Chang (1892-1957) from the Republic of China. Malik and Chang were the only philosophers in the drafting team, and they were all-rounded intellectuals and educators. In contrast to Chang and Malik, several of the other writers of the UDHR were lawyers or politicians. Chang and Malik came from different philosophical traditions. Chang had the pragmatist philosopher John Dewey as his tutor at Columbia in the beginning of the 1920s. Malik studied for the philosophers Alfred North Whitehead at Harvard and Martin Heidegger in Freiburg during the 1930s. The philosophical differences between Chang and Malik created fruitful dialogues between the two drafters. This article explores how the educational backgrounds and the previous professions of Chang and Malik influenced the character of the UDHR.
摘要:《世界人权宣言》(UDHR)是在1948年12月10日在联合国通过之前,几个参与者和组织经过近两年的努力才形成的。《宣言》是世界上最著名的翻译文件之一,尽管其原则和道德见解在今天的世界范围内远未实现。虽然这是一部有许多作者参与的合作作品,但一些作家以一种特殊的方式发挥了重要作用。本文旨在介绍和分析两位主要起草者的贡献,即黎巴嫩的哲学家和外交家查尔斯·马利克(1906-1987)和中华民国的哲学家和外交家张昌璋(1892-1957)。马立克和张是起草小组中仅有的哲学家,他们是全面的知识分子和教育家。与张戎和马利克不同,《世界人权宣言》的其他几位作者是律师或政治家。张和马利克来自不同的哲学传统。20世纪20年代初,张戎在哥伦比亚大学的导师是实用主义哲学家约翰·杜威(John Dewey)。20世纪30年代,马利克在哈佛大学师从哲学家阿尔弗雷德·诺斯·怀特黑德,在弗莱堡师从马丁·海德格尔。张戎和马利克之间的哲学差异使两位起草者之间的对话富有成果。本文探讨了张戎和马利克的教育背景和之前的职业如何影响《世界人权宣言》的性质。
{"title":"P.C. Chang and Charles Malik: The Two Philosophers of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights","authors":"Hans Ingvar Roth","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910487","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910487","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was the result of almost two years of work from several participants and organizations before its adoption in the United Nations on December 10, 1948. The Declaration is one of the world's most famous and translated documents even though its principles and moral insights are far from realized around the world today. Although it was a collaborative work with many authors involved, some writers played significant roles in a special way. This article aims to present and analyze the contributions of two of the main drafters, namely the philosopher and diplomat Charles Malik (1906-1987) from Lebanon and the philosopher and diplomat P.C. Chang (1892-1957) from the Republic of China. Malik and Chang were the only philosophers in the drafting team, and they were all-rounded intellectuals and educators. In contrast to Chang and Malik, several of the other writers of the UDHR were lawyers or politicians. Chang and Malik came from different philosophical traditions. Chang had the pragmatist philosopher John Dewey as his tutor at Columbia in the beginning of the 1920s. Malik studied for the philosophers Alfred North Whitehead at Harvard and Martin Heidegger in Freiburg during the 1930s. The philosophical differences between Chang and Malik created fruitful dialogues between the two drafters. This article explores how the educational backgrounds and the previous professions of Chang and Malik influenced the character of the UDHR.","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"30 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136103244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contributors 贡献者
3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a903341
{"title":"Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a903341","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a903341","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135931305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Human Rights Quarterly
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1