Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910496
Rebecca Root
Reviewed by: The War in Court: Inside the Long Fight Against Torture by Lisa Hajjar Rebecca Root (bio) Lisa Hajjar, The War in Court: Inside the Long Fight Against Torture (University of California Press 2022), ISBN 9780520378933, 376 pages. Lisa Hajjar was already an established expert on the sociology of torture when the United States (US) began torturing detainees in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. For over three decades, she has explored the legal, cultural, and ethical issues around torture, interviewed hundreds of lawyers, and witnessed these questions play out in courtrooms around the world. Her research has included more than a dozen trips to Guantánamo Bay. On one level, The War in Court details the relentless efforts of lawyers—both military and civilian—to uphold the rule of law in the face of a US policy endorsing interrogation under torture. Lawyers like those at the Center for Constitutional Rights were focused on the rights of the detainees they were defending, but government-appointed judge advocates general (JAGs) were equally appalled by the establishment of military commissions intended to allow evidence extracted under torture, in contravention to all domestic and international legal norms and obligations. All took issue with the opinions that had been offered by government lawyers to justify the torture that reshaped America's national security policy from 2001 to 2006. In the early chapters, Hajjar deftly walks the reader through the jawdropping revelations of those years: the faulty legal memos, the sickening photographs from Abu Ghraib, the Kafkaesque Guantánamo Bay, the black sites, the waterboarding, walling, force-feeding, and more. Those moments have been seared into the memories of human rights scholars, though perhaps they are fading from public memory or, worse yet, seamlessly incorporated into it. Hajjar reminds us of the key legal victories—from Rasul v. Bush in 2004 to Hamdan v. Rumsfeld in 2006 to Boumediene v. Bush in 2008—but also of the many failed arguments lawyers advanced in these years. Her sociological training leads her to explore the community of lawyers who came together to wage controversial struggles over many years, enduring constant delays and setbacks, but always working for the rule of law and reaffirming one another's sense of the duty to uphold it. While scholars, detainees, and human rights non-governmental organizations played crucial roles as well, it is the lawyers who are at the heart of this analysis. Though American courts failed to hold the perpetrators of these crimes accountable, departing from the trends in Europe and Latin America, the lawyers in these cases were able to use even the cases they lost to forge new legal bulwarks in favor of detainees' rights. Hundreds of Gitmo detainees were released without charge, and despite the government's extensive efforts to keep secret [End Page 733] the details of detainee mistreatment, the truth came out. But juxtap
莉萨·哈贾尔,《法庭上的战争:反对酷刑的长期斗争》(加州大学出版社2022),ISBN 9780520378933, 376页。当美国为应对2001年9月11日的恐怖袭击而开始折磨被拘留者时,丽莎·哈贾尔已经是酷刑社会学方面的知名专家。三十多年来,她一直在探索与酷刑有关的法律、文化和道德问题,采访了数百名律师,并目睹了这些问题在世界各地的法庭上上演。她的研究包括十几次访问Guantánamo Bay。在一个层面上,《法庭上的战争》详细描述了军队和平民律师在面对美国支持酷刑审讯的政策时坚持法治的不懈努力。宪法权利中心(Center for Constitutional Rights)的律师们关注的是他们所辩护的被拘留者的权利,但政府任命的总辩护法官(JAGs)同样对军事委员会的设立感到震惊,该委员会旨在允许通过酷刑提取证据,这违反了所有国内和国际法律规范和义务。所有人都对政府律师为2001年至2006年重塑美国国家安全政策的酷刑辩护的观点提出异议。在书的前几章,哈贾尔巧妙地带领读者回顾了那些年令人瞠目结舌的揭露:错误的法律备忘录、阿布格莱布监狱(Abu Ghraib)令人作呕的照片、卡夫卡式的Guantánamo海湾、黑牢、水刑、隔离墙、强迫喂食等等。这些时刻已经烙进了人权学者的记忆,尽管它们可能正在淡出公众的记忆,或者更糟的是,被无缝地纳入了公众的记忆。哈贾尔让我们想起了关键的法律胜利——从2004年的拉苏尔诉布什案到2006年的哈姆丹诉拉姆斯菲尔德案,再到2008年的布米丁诉布什案——但也想起了这些年来律师们提出的许多失败的论点。她的社会学训练使她探索了律师群体,他们多年来聚集在一起进行有争议的斗争,忍受着不断的延误和挫折,但始终为法治而努力,并重申了彼此维护法治的责任。虽然学者、被拘留者和人权非政府组织也发挥了关键作用,但律师才是这一分析的核心。尽管与欧洲和拉丁美洲的趋势不同,美国法院未能追究这些罪行的肇事者的责任,但这些案件中的律师甚至能够利用他们输掉的案件来建立新的法律堡垒,以维护被拘留者的权利。数百名关塔那摩囚犯在没有受到指控的情况下被释放,尽管政府竭尽全力对虐待囚犯的细节保密,但真相还是大白了。但与重建反酷刑法律规范的故事并列的是第二个更悲惨的故事。布什(Bush)和奥巴马(Obama)政府试图将被披露的虐待囚犯事件对美国声誉造成的损害降到最低,因此他们改变了政策,用无人机袭击取代了对恐怖分子嫌疑人的拘留。在与美国没有交战的国家杀害数千名恐怖分子嫌疑人,至少引发了与酷刑一样多的道德和法律问题,但未能引起同样程度的公愤或司法支持。关于奥巴马政府的章节尤其引人注目,因为哈贾尔详细描述了奥巴马反对军事委员会的强硬立场和关闭Guantánamo湾的承诺是如何很快失败的。因为Guantánamo有这么多人遭受过酷刑,奥巴马面临着一个令人不安的困境:接受使用酷刑使对被拘留者的公平审判变得不可能,并将他们释放,或者允许新的军事委员会继续起诉。美国政府选择了后者。作为候选人,奥巴马曾承诺要追究虐待者和使他们承担责任的政策制定者的责任。作为总统,他决定“向前看,而不是向后看”。事实上,揭露美国人在反恐战争中所犯罪行的举报人受到了更为严厉的追捕……
{"title":"The War in Court: Inside the Long Fight Against Torture by Lisa Hajjar (review)","authors":"Rebecca Root","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910496","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910496","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: The War in Court: Inside the Long Fight Against Torture by Lisa Hajjar Rebecca Root (bio) Lisa Hajjar, The War in Court: Inside the Long Fight Against Torture (University of California Press 2022), ISBN 9780520378933, 376 pages. Lisa Hajjar was already an established expert on the sociology of torture when the United States (US) began torturing detainees in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. For over three decades, she has explored the legal, cultural, and ethical issues around torture, interviewed hundreds of lawyers, and witnessed these questions play out in courtrooms around the world. Her research has included more than a dozen trips to Guantánamo Bay. On one level, The War in Court details the relentless efforts of lawyers—both military and civilian—to uphold the rule of law in the face of a US policy endorsing interrogation under torture. Lawyers like those at the Center for Constitutional Rights were focused on the rights of the detainees they were defending, but government-appointed judge advocates general (JAGs) were equally appalled by the establishment of military commissions intended to allow evidence extracted under torture, in contravention to all domestic and international legal norms and obligations. All took issue with the opinions that had been offered by government lawyers to justify the torture that reshaped America's national security policy from 2001 to 2006. In the early chapters, Hajjar deftly walks the reader through the jawdropping revelations of those years: the faulty legal memos, the sickening photographs from Abu Ghraib, the Kafkaesque Guantánamo Bay, the black sites, the waterboarding, walling, force-feeding, and more. Those moments have been seared into the memories of human rights scholars, though perhaps they are fading from public memory or, worse yet, seamlessly incorporated into it. Hajjar reminds us of the key legal victories—from Rasul v. Bush in 2004 to Hamdan v. Rumsfeld in 2006 to Boumediene v. Bush in 2008—but also of the many failed arguments lawyers advanced in these years. Her sociological training leads her to explore the community of lawyers who came together to wage controversial struggles over many years, enduring constant delays and setbacks, but always working for the rule of law and reaffirming one another's sense of the duty to uphold it. While scholars, detainees, and human rights non-governmental organizations played crucial roles as well, it is the lawyers who are at the heart of this analysis. Though American courts failed to hold the perpetrators of these crimes accountable, departing from the trends in Europe and Latin America, the lawyers in these cases were able to use even the cases they lost to forge new legal bulwarks in favor of detainees' rights. Hundreds of Gitmo detainees were released without charge, and despite the government's extensive efforts to keep secret [End Page 733] the details of detainee mistreatment, the truth came out. But juxtap","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"87 1-2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910500
{"title":"Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910500","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910500","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"84 3-4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910498
Eric Stover
Reviewed by: Mass Graves, Truth and Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Investigation of Mass Graves eds. by Ellie Smith & Melanie Klinker Eric Stover (bio) Ellie Smith & Melanie Klinker eds., Mass Graves, Truth and Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Investigation of Mass Graves (Edward Elgar Publishing 2023), ISBN 9781800882379, 186 pages. Ellie Smith and Melanie Klinker, a researcher and law professor respectively at Bournemouth University, have edited an excellent volume on how forensic scientists, judges, and court investigations have conducted mass grave investigations and interacted with families of the disappeared since the early 1980s. The volume offers an interdisciplinary examination of all states of a mass graves investigation from discovery of a site to the process of investigation and the conduct of commemoration activities.1 As someone who has been a participant or close observer of forensic investigations of mass graves in Argentina, Guatemala, Rwanda, Iraq, the former Yugoslavia, and the United States, I admire the care that the editors and authors have taken not to oversimplify what can be a highly complex investigatory process from a legal, forensic, and psycho-social perspective. Forty years ago, my colleague forensic anthropologist Clyde Snow advocated that the search for the disappeared must be conducted for three reasons: to locate, identify, and return the remains of the disappeared to family members [End Page 739] for proper burial; to gather evidence to hold perpetrators accountable; and to set the historical record straight. While Snow's objectives still hold true today, it must also be recognized that the quest to equate truth to identification and justice to perpetrator accountability can be both distinctive and challenging. As the book's editors, Smith and Klinker—who also are co-authors of the 2020 Bournemouth Protocol on Mass Grave Protection and Investigations—caution there is no such thing as a "standard" or "typical" mass grave.2 Each site is "highly context-specific" and "the way in which sites are handled will necessarily vary accordingly."3 So, what are the factors that can determine how a mass grave site will be located and investigated? To begin with, perpetrators often make every effort to hide mass graves, and with the passage of time, vegetation can spread and make locating the sites even more difficult. Access to mass graves can also be delayed during and after armed conflicts. For example, during our investigations of mass graves in the former Yugoslavia in the early 1990s, Snow and I were accompanied by United Nations deminers to sweep potential mass grave sites for explosive ordnance, including bobby traps and landmines. (This practice became a standard operating procedure during the mass graves investigations in the former Yugoslavia for years to come.) On one occasion Serb forces expelled our team, comprised of forensic scientists from around the world, from a mass grave in ea
{"title":"Mass Graves, Truth and Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Investigation of Mass Graves eds. by Ellie Smith & Melanie Klinker (review)","authors":"Eric Stover","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910498","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910498","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Mass Graves, Truth and Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Investigation of Mass Graves eds. by Ellie Smith & Melanie Klinker Eric Stover (bio) Ellie Smith & Melanie Klinker eds., Mass Graves, Truth and Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Investigation of Mass Graves (Edward Elgar Publishing 2023), ISBN 9781800882379, 186 pages. Ellie Smith and Melanie Klinker, a researcher and law professor respectively at Bournemouth University, have edited an excellent volume on how forensic scientists, judges, and court investigations have conducted mass grave investigations and interacted with families of the disappeared since the early 1980s. The volume offers an interdisciplinary examination of all states of a mass graves investigation from discovery of a site to the process of investigation and the conduct of commemoration activities.1 As someone who has been a participant or close observer of forensic investigations of mass graves in Argentina, Guatemala, Rwanda, Iraq, the former Yugoslavia, and the United States, I admire the care that the editors and authors have taken not to oversimplify what can be a highly complex investigatory process from a legal, forensic, and psycho-social perspective. Forty years ago, my colleague forensic anthropologist Clyde Snow advocated that the search for the disappeared must be conducted for three reasons: to locate, identify, and return the remains of the disappeared to family members [End Page 739] for proper burial; to gather evidence to hold perpetrators accountable; and to set the historical record straight. While Snow's objectives still hold true today, it must also be recognized that the quest to equate truth to identification and justice to perpetrator accountability can be both distinctive and challenging. As the book's editors, Smith and Klinker—who also are co-authors of the 2020 Bournemouth Protocol on Mass Grave Protection and Investigations—caution there is no such thing as a \"standard\" or \"typical\" mass grave.2 Each site is \"highly context-specific\" and \"the way in which sites are handled will necessarily vary accordingly.\"3 So, what are the factors that can determine how a mass grave site will be located and investigated? To begin with, perpetrators often make every effort to hide mass graves, and with the passage of time, vegetation can spread and make locating the sites even more difficult. Access to mass graves can also be delayed during and after armed conflicts. For example, during our investigations of mass graves in the former Yugoslavia in the early 1990s, Snow and I were accompanied by United Nations deminers to sweep potential mass grave sites for explosive ordnance, including bobby traps and landmines. (This practice became a standard operating procedure during the mass graves investigations in the former Yugoslavia for years to come.) On one occasion Serb forces expelled our team, comprised of forensic scientists from around the world, from a mass grave in ea","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"86 7-8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910489
Jean Connolly Carmalt
ABSTRACT: This article contributes to literature on economic and social rights by examining how everyday places and spaces translate structural inequalities into individualized violations of international norms. Drawing on data from a participatory action research project in New York called The Legal Disruption Project (LDP), it argues for new models of knowledge production that bridge gaps between the experiences of marginalized populations and human rights practitioners. The LDP demonstrates how centering the voices of affected communities can contribute substantive insights to effective remedies for human rights violations. In particular, the article suggests potential for explicitly spatial remedies defined through participatory processes of community engagement.
{"title":"Human Rights, Remedy, and Everyday Geographies of Injustice: Perspectives from a Participatory Action Research Project","authors":"Jean Connolly Carmalt","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910489","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910489","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: This article contributes to literature on economic and social rights by examining how everyday places and spaces translate structural inequalities into individualized violations of international norms. Drawing on data from a participatory action research project in New York called The Legal Disruption Project (LDP), it argues for new models of knowledge production that bridge gaps between the experiences of marginalized populations and human rights practitioners. The LDP demonstrates how centering the voices of affected communities can contribute substantive insights to effective remedies for human rights violations. In particular, the article suggests potential for explicitly spatial remedies defined through participatory processes of community engagement.","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"86 1-4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910494
Muneeb Khan, Yen-Chiang Chang
Reviewed by: International Human Rights Law and Destitution: An Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Perspective by Luke D. Graham Muneeb Khan (bio) and Yen-Chiang Chang (bio) Luke D. Graham, International Human Rights Law and Destitution: An Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Perspective (Routledge 2022) ISBN: 9781032074726, 192 pages. The issue of destitution has long been a concern for anti-poverty advocates, policy-makers, and researchers. While there is a general understanding of the experience of destitution, there has been a lack of attention given to its relationship with the denial of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ESCR). The book International Human Rights Law and Destitution: An Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Perspective, authored by Luke D. Graham, explores destitution from a human rights-based perspective, specifically focusing on ESCR. The book provides a novel understanding and definition of destitution based on the realization of ESCR, highlighting the nexus between destitution and the denial of these rights. The book applies this definition to a United Kingdom (UK) case study to demonstrate how destitution manifests and provides recommendations for addressing destitution through the realization of these rights. The book comprises six chapters, with each chapter providing an in-depth analysis of different aspects of destitution through the application of a multidisciplinary legal research methodology. Chapter 1 establishes the context by introducing the concept of destitution and highlighting its distinctions from poverty and extreme poverty. The author emphasizes the importance of an ESCR perspective and offers an outline of the book's structure. The chapter examines human rights-based definitions of poverty and extreme poverty, underscoring the absence of a similar definition for destitution. It argues that destitution entails meeting basic needs independently, without relying on charity, and posits that destitution is separate from poverty and extreme poverty. This initial chapter serves as a strong foundation, effectively introducing key concepts and themes, while presenting a fresh definition of destitution within the framework of human rights. The author's meticulous research and insightful analysis contribute to a novel perspective in the realm of human rights. Chapter 2 delves into the foundational concepts that determine the necessary level of rights realization to prevent destitution. The author argues that this level is shaped by three key ideas: firstly, reliance on charitable assistance hinders meeting the destitution threshold; secondly, destitution can arise even if only one component right falls short of the destitution threshold; and finally, the destitution threshold encompasses a universal minimum component while also requiring context-specific determinations. Although the chapter effectively underscores the importance of a human rights-based approach to address destitution, the author could furt
《国际人权法与贫困:经济、社会和文化权利的视角》,作者:Luke D. Graham,《国际人权法与贫困:经济、社会和文化权利的视角》(Routledge出版社,2022),ISBN: 9781032074726, 192页。长期以来,贫困问题一直是反贫困倡导者、政策制定者和研究人员关注的问题。虽然对贫困的经历有一般的了解,但对其与剥夺经济、社会和文化权利的关系却缺乏注意。Luke D. Graham撰写的《国际人权法与贫困:经济、社会和文化权利视角》一书从基于人权的角度探讨了贫困问题,特别关注了经济、社会和文化权利。这本书在实现经济、社会和文化权利的基础上提供了对贫困的全新理解和定义,强调了贫困与剥夺这些权利之间的联系。本书将这一定义应用于英国的一个案例研究,以展示贫困是如何体现的,并提供了通过实现这些权利来解决贫困的建议。本书包括六章,每章通过应用多学科法律研究方法对贫困的不同方面进行深入分析。第一章通过介绍贫困的概念并强调其与贫困和极端贫困的区别来建立背景。作者强调了ESCR视角的重要性,并提供了本书结构的大纲。本章审查了基于人权的贫困和极端贫困的定义,强调缺乏对贫困的类似定义。它认为,贫困需要独立满足基本需求,而不依赖慈善,并假设贫困与贫困和极端贫困是分开的。这第一章是一个坚实的基础,有效地介绍了关键概念和主题,同时在人权框架内提出了贫困的新定义。作者细致的研究和深刻的分析为人权领域提供了全新的视角。第二章探讨了确定权利实现的必要水平以防止贫困的基本概念。作者认为,这一水平是由三个关键思想形成的:第一,对慈善援助的依赖阻碍了达到贫困门槛;第二,即使只有一项组成权利达不到贫困门槛,也会产生贫困;最后,贫困门槛包括一个普遍的最低组成部分,同时也需要具体情况的确定。虽然本章有效地强调了以人权为基础的方法解决贫困问题的重要性,但作者可以通过纳入案例研究来进一步加强讨论,以说明三个关键思想。第三章错综复杂地探讨了贫困门槛框架,细致地考察了每个单独的组成部分权利。通过将贫困门槛应用于每一项权利,出现了一种普遍适用的对贫困的理解,这种理解植根于与每一项具体权利相关的最低核心义务。分析超出了最低限度的核心义务,深入探讨了这些权利所固有的更广泛的规范本质。这一全面的探索为每一项组成权利确立了具体情况下的贫困门槛,有助于对贫困进行基于人权的定义,而不仅仅是权利没有实现。但是,如果在人权框架内纳入贫穷和极端贫穷的现有定义,并探讨权利的有形性理论及其与组成部分权利的联系,最终加强解决与贫困有关的问题,讨论本来可以进一步丰富。第四章深入探讨了紧缩问题及其与英国日益加剧的贫困之间的关系。研究了紧缩对社会保障政策的深远影响,并将与社会保障有关的因素确定为贫困的主要催化剂。作者细致地评估了过去十年社会保障政策的转变及其累积后果,最终得出结论:英国的紧缩政策本质上延续了贫困。本章全面分析了紧缩对英国贫困的影响,强调了以人权为中心的社会政策方法的必要性。作者对紧缩、贫困和慈善服务优先于……的审查和批评。
{"title":"International Human Rights Law and Destitution: An Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Perspective by Luke D. Graham (review)","authors":"Muneeb Khan, Yen-Chiang Chang","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910494","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910494","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: International Human Rights Law and Destitution: An Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Perspective by Luke D. Graham Muneeb Khan (bio) and Yen-Chiang Chang (bio) Luke D. Graham, International Human Rights Law and Destitution: An Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Perspective (Routledge 2022) ISBN: 9781032074726, 192 pages. The issue of destitution has long been a concern for anti-poverty advocates, policy-makers, and researchers. While there is a general understanding of the experience of destitution, there has been a lack of attention given to its relationship with the denial of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ESCR). The book International Human Rights Law and Destitution: An Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Perspective, authored by Luke D. Graham, explores destitution from a human rights-based perspective, specifically focusing on ESCR. The book provides a novel understanding and definition of destitution based on the realization of ESCR, highlighting the nexus between destitution and the denial of these rights. The book applies this definition to a United Kingdom (UK) case study to demonstrate how destitution manifests and provides recommendations for addressing destitution through the realization of these rights. The book comprises six chapters, with each chapter providing an in-depth analysis of different aspects of destitution through the application of a multidisciplinary legal research methodology. Chapter 1 establishes the context by introducing the concept of destitution and highlighting its distinctions from poverty and extreme poverty. The author emphasizes the importance of an ESCR perspective and offers an outline of the book's structure. The chapter examines human rights-based definitions of poverty and extreme poverty, underscoring the absence of a similar definition for destitution. It argues that destitution entails meeting basic needs independently, without relying on charity, and posits that destitution is separate from poverty and extreme poverty. This initial chapter serves as a strong foundation, effectively introducing key concepts and themes, while presenting a fresh definition of destitution within the framework of human rights. The author's meticulous research and insightful analysis contribute to a novel perspective in the realm of human rights. Chapter 2 delves into the foundational concepts that determine the necessary level of rights realization to prevent destitution. The author argues that this level is shaped by three key ideas: firstly, reliance on charitable assistance hinders meeting the destitution threshold; secondly, destitution can arise even if only one component right falls short of the destitution threshold; and finally, the destitution threshold encompasses a universal minimum component while also requiring context-specific determinations. Although the chapter effectively underscores the importance of a human rights-based approach to address destitution, the author could furt","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"85 5-6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910492
Mia Jeronimus
ABSTRACT: The case of Dutch women imprisoned in Japanese internment camps in Java, 1941-45, is a little known chapter within the well-known context of the Second World War. This article deciphers the possibilities of their experience by examining two temporally distinct sets of sources from the women's perspectives. The first comprises a series of ego-documents and interviews written during the war and just after it, and the second is a collection of sources from the 1990s onwards, in the form of memoir, oral history, and children's testimonies spoken in front of the Japanese Embassy in The Hague in 2005. In the spaces and inconsistencies between these two sets of testimony a diverse and complex picture of female experience is found across three predominant themes: motherhood, female community, and sexual assault. Each section is an insight into how agency is sought when agency is denied, how the women held themselves, organized themselves, and supported and fought against one another within a regime indifferent to whether they lived or died.
{"title":"Suffering and Survival: The Experience of Dutch Women in Japanese Internment Camps in Java, 1941–45","authors":"Mia Jeronimus","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910492","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910492","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: The case of Dutch women imprisoned in Japanese internment camps in Java, 1941-45, is a little known chapter within the well-known context of the Second World War. This article deciphers the possibilities of their experience by examining two temporally distinct sets of sources from the women's perspectives. The first comprises a series of ego-documents and interviews written during the war and just after it, and the second is a collection of sources from the 1990s onwards, in the form of memoir, oral history, and children's testimonies spoken in front of the Japanese Embassy in The Hague in 2005. In the spaces and inconsistencies between these two sets of testimony a diverse and complex picture of female experience is found across three predominant themes: motherhood, female community, and sexual assault. Each section is an insight into how agency is sought when agency is denied, how the women held themselves, organized themselves, and supported and fought against one another within a regime indifferent to whether they lived or died.","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"85 11-12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910497
Don Selby
Reviewed by: Border Humanitarians: Gendered Order and Insecurity on the Thai-Burmese Frontier by Adam P. Saltsman Don Selby (bio) Adam P. Saltsman, Border Humanitarians: Gendered Order and Insecurity on the Thai-Burmese Frontier (Syracuse University Press 2022), ISBN 9780815637639, 288 pages. Adam P. Saltsman's Border Humanitarians is a welcome addition to scholarship that takes both a critical and ethnographic approach to understanding humanitarian practices. The research underpinning this work extended for the better part of a decade, and Saltsman conducted a significant portion of it while working with an international humanitarian organization in the border province of Mae Sot, Thailand. Consisting of five chapters, plus its introduction and conclusion, it explores the work of humanitarian [End Page 734] work on gender-based violence among Burmese migrants in Mae Sot. A stage-setting introduction describes the area along the Moei River where migration into Mae Sot occurs, the labor camps and makeshift communities that have arisen there, and the variegated migrant neighborhoods, communities, and congregations that live in the area. It also sets out the book's theoretical ambitions: Border Humanitarians brings together the threads of geographic theorizing on bordering and borderscapes and scholarship on performativity, political subjectivity, and positionality in relation to gender and gender violence in contexts of dispossession in the deployment of the idea of gendered positionalities.1 In addition, Saltsman argues for the methodological value of reflexive ethnography, and of close attention to the ordering force of discourse at sites of humanitarian intervention. The second chapter provides the political-economic history (both colonial and post-colonial) shaping the emergence of borders, and of labor migration with respect to these borders. Borderlands, and the sorts of exploitation and politicaleconomic possibility they provide are not simply given, here, but are produced by capital flows and the history of political maneuvering among colonial powers. In chapter three the voices of Burmese migrants make their appearance. Participant observation seems to have been impossible in work camps and the precarious, make-shift neighborhoods cobbled together by Burmese migrants, leaving a certain ethnographic depth unrealizable. Interviews with migrants, however, were possible and do important work to develop a picture of migrants' palpable insecurity and constraint in Thailand, and how the immediacy of their vulnerability contributes to the circulation of "conservative notions of home and culture" among Burmese in Mae Sot.2 These notions play an important role in perpetuating conservative understandings of femininity and masculinity, which feed, in their turn, gender-based violence among Burmese migrants. As Saltsman explains it, this chapter: centered on how precarious work, the challenges of displacement, and gender traditions intersect in a mutua
Adam P. Saltsman,《边境人道主义者:泰缅边境的性别秩序和不安全》(Syracuse University Press 2022), ISBN 9780815637639, 288页。Adam P. Saltsman的《边境人道主义者》是一个受欢迎的学术补充,它采用批判和民族志的方法来理解人道主义实践。支撑这项工作的研究持续了近十年的时间,Saltsman在泰国边境省份湄索(Mae Sot)与一个国际人道主义组织合作时进行了相当大的一部分研究。本书由五章组成,再加上引言和结语,探讨了湄索缅甸移民中基于性别的暴力的人道主义工作。舞台布景介绍了茂依河沿岸移民进入美索的地区,在那里出现的劳改营和临时社区,以及居住在该地区的各种移民社区、社区和会众。它还阐述了本书的理论抱负:《边境人道主义者》汇集了边界和边界景观的地理理论线索,以及在部署性别地位观念的剥夺背景下与性别和性别暴力有关的表演性、政治主体性和位置性的学术研究此外,Saltsman还论证了反思性民族志的方法论价值,以及对人道主义干预现场话语秩序力量的密切关注。第二章提供了政治经济史(包括殖民时期和后殖民时期)对边界产生的影响,以及与这些边界相关的劳动力迁移。《边疆》,以及它们所提供的各种剥削和政治经济可能性,在这里不是简单地给定的,而是由资本流动和殖民大国之间的政治操纵历史所产生的。第三章,缅甸移民的声音出现了。在工作营地和由缅甸移民拼凑而成的不稳定的临时社区中,参与者的观察似乎是不可能的,这使得某种民族志的深度无法实现。然而,对移民的采访是可能的,并且做了重要的工作,以发展移民在泰国明显的不安全感和限制的画面,以及他们的脆弱性如何直接促成梅梭缅甸人中“家庭和文化的保守观念”的传播。2这些观念在延续对女性和男性气质的保守理解方面发挥了重要作用,反过来又助长了缅甸移民中的性别暴力。正如Saltsman所解释的那样,这一章的重点是:不稳定的工作、流离失所的挑战和性别传统如何在缅甸移民的家庭和社区空间中以一种相互构成的方式相交,而不是在工厂车间或田地里。移徙者关于工作场所外暴力的叙述为考虑经济生产和剥夺如何渗透到他们社会生活的各个方面提供了一个重要的角度第四章标志着向一种更接近于民族志实地工作的研究形式的转变。在这一章中,Saltsman提出了他第一个关于反思性方法论的持续案例,因为这一实地工作的地点是他工作的全球北方人道主义组织。作为贯穿本章的反身性的要素,他强调了其他几个关键的分析概念,包括位置性、表演性、知识建构、性别话语的生产和流通以及集合。这一章关注的是“人道主义及其逻辑在表演上的再现和主张”的方式。这包括,首先他自己作为研究负责人的地位,他必须以捐助者和非政府组织主管能够理解的方式描述研究小组的发现。其次是一名美国援助工作者对性别暴力的定义的愤怒断言,这似乎是从世界卫生组织(World Health Organization)关于这一主题的文献中撕下来的,这不仅导致了克伦人、缅甸人和泰国人之间的讨论被关闭,而且引发了Saltsman本人对她的干预的一种监督。最后,研究小组使用专业化、抽象的语言来描述他们的移民对话者之间的暴力行为。通过这些焦点,他看到话语是如何产生的……
{"title":"Border Humanitarians: Gendered Order and Insecurity on the Thai-Burmese Frontier by Adam P. Saltsman (review)","authors":"Don Selby","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910497","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910497","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Border Humanitarians: Gendered Order and Insecurity on the Thai-Burmese Frontier by Adam P. Saltsman Don Selby (bio) Adam P. Saltsman, Border Humanitarians: Gendered Order and Insecurity on the Thai-Burmese Frontier (Syracuse University Press 2022), ISBN 9780815637639, 288 pages. Adam P. Saltsman's Border Humanitarians is a welcome addition to scholarship that takes both a critical and ethnographic approach to understanding humanitarian practices. The research underpinning this work extended for the better part of a decade, and Saltsman conducted a significant portion of it while working with an international humanitarian organization in the border province of Mae Sot, Thailand. Consisting of five chapters, plus its introduction and conclusion, it explores the work of humanitarian [End Page 734] work on gender-based violence among Burmese migrants in Mae Sot. A stage-setting introduction describes the area along the Moei River where migration into Mae Sot occurs, the labor camps and makeshift communities that have arisen there, and the variegated migrant neighborhoods, communities, and congregations that live in the area. It also sets out the book's theoretical ambitions: Border Humanitarians brings together the threads of geographic theorizing on bordering and borderscapes and scholarship on performativity, political subjectivity, and positionality in relation to gender and gender violence in contexts of dispossession in the deployment of the idea of gendered positionalities.1 In addition, Saltsman argues for the methodological value of reflexive ethnography, and of close attention to the ordering force of discourse at sites of humanitarian intervention. The second chapter provides the political-economic history (both colonial and post-colonial) shaping the emergence of borders, and of labor migration with respect to these borders. Borderlands, and the sorts of exploitation and politicaleconomic possibility they provide are not simply given, here, but are produced by capital flows and the history of political maneuvering among colonial powers. In chapter three the voices of Burmese migrants make their appearance. Participant observation seems to have been impossible in work camps and the precarious, make-shift neighborhoods cobbled together by Burmese migrants, leaving a certain ethnographic depth unrealizable. Interviews with migrants, however, were possible and do important work to develop a picture of migrants' palpable insecurity and constraint in Thailand, and how the immediacy of their vulnerability contributes to the circulation of \"conservative notions of home and culture\" among Burmese in Mae Sot.2 These notions play an important role in perpetuating conservative understandings of femininity and masculinity, which feed, in their turn, gender-based violence among Burmese migrants. As Saltsman explains it, this chapter: centered on how precarious work, the challenges of displacement, and gender traditions intersect in a mutua","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"84 6-7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910491
Gauthier de Beco
ABSTRACT: This article argues that adopting the lens of disability may provide a way forward for the revival of human rights. It shows how it is disability that draws attention to resource deprivation that hampers the enjoyment of human rights. It does so by focusing on two novel aspects of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD): the general principle of participation and the adoption of a rights-based approach to dealing with disability. To illustrate this view, it uses as example the impact the restrictions have had on disabled people during the Covid-19 pandemic.
{"title":"The Revival of Human Rights: A New Perspective on Human Rights Through the Lens of Disability","authors":"Gauthier de Beco","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910491","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910491","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: This article argues that adopting the lens of disability may provide a way forward for the revival of human rights. It shows how it is disability that draws attention to resource deprivation that hampers the enjoyment of human rights. It does so by focusing on two novel aspects of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD): the general principle of participation and the adoption of a rights-based approach to dealing with disability. To illustrate this view, it uses as example the impact the restrictions have had on disabled people during the Covid-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"82 11-12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a910487
Hans Ingvar Roth
ABSTRACT: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was the result of almost two years of work from several participants and organizations before its adoption in the United Nations on December 10, 1948. The Declaration is one of the world's most famous and translated documents even though its principles and moral insights are far from realized around the world today. Although it was a collaborative work with many authors involved, some writers played significant roles in a special way. This article aims to present and analyze the contributions of two of the main drafters, namely the philosopher and diplomat Charles Malik (1906-1987) from Lebanon and the philosopher and diplomat P.C. Chang (1892-1957) from the Republic of China. Malik and Chang were the only philosophers in the drafting team, and they were all-rounded intellectuals and educators. In contrast to Chang and Malik, several of the other writers of the UDHR were lawyers or politicians. Chang and Malik came from different philosophical traditions. Chang had the pragmatist philosopher John Dewey as his tutor at Columbia in the beginning of the 1920s. Malik studied for the philosophers Alfred North Whitehead at Harvard and Martin Heidegger in Freiburg during the 1930s. The philosophical differences between Chang and Malik created fruitful dialogues between the two drafters. This article explores how the educational backgrounds and the previous professions of Chang and Malik influenced the character of the UDHR.
{"title":"P.C. Chang and Charles Malik: The Two Philosophers of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights","authors":"Hans Ingvar Roth","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a910487","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a910487","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was the result of almost two years of work from several participants and organizations before its adoption in the United Nations on December 10, 1948. The Declaration is one of the world's most famous and translated documents even though its principles and moral insights are far from realized around the world today. Although it was a collaborative work with many authors involved, some writers played significant roles in a special way. This article aims to present and analyze the contributions of two of the main drafters, namely the philosopher and diplomat Charles Malik (1906-1987) from Lebanon and the philosopher and diplomat P.C. Chang (1892-1957) from the Republic of China. Malik and Chang were the only philosophers in the drafting team, and they were all-rounded intellectuals and educators. In contrast to Chang and Malik, several of the other writers of the UDHR were lawyers or politicians. Chang and Malik came from different philosophical traditions. Chang had the pragmatist philosopher John Dewey as his tutor at Columbia in the beginning of the 1920s. Malik studied for the philosophers Alfred North Whitehead at Harvard and Martin Heidegger in Freiburg during the 1930s. The philosophical differences between Chang and Malik created fruitful dialogues between the two drafters. This article explores how the educational backgrounds and the previous professions of Chang and Malik influenced the character of the UDHR.","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"30 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136103244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2023.a903341
{"title":"Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.a903341","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.a903341","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135931305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}