{"title":"Issue Information / Dans ce numéro","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/cag.70050","DOIUrl":"10.1111/cag.70050","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47619,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cag.70050","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145761157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper critically examines how data availability and algorithmic constraints reshape research design, relevance, and outcomes in GIScience. Through a case study of automated curb ramp detection in Seattle, Washington, I demonstrate how the limitations of data, tools, and computational frameworks frequently shape the ambitions of early-stage geographic inquiry. While GeoAI and machine learning offer new possibilities for spatial analysis, they also embed assumptions, value hierarchies, and technical limitations that influence what questions can be asked and what answers can be obtained. Using a random forest model and open-source LiDAR and imagery data, I show how data sparsity, class imbalance, and aspatial training techniques complicate both accuracy and utility. Drawing on visual methods and explainable AI, I interrogate how the algorithm “learned” patterns and where it failed, revealing that AI-identified relevance often diverges from socially meaningful goals. I argue for a reflexive approach to GeoAI—one that embraces error, foregrounds relevance, and resists the allure of algorithmic objectivity. The paper ultimately calls for centering research relevance alongside reproducibility and replicability in spatial data science, advocating for humility in the face of technological complexity.
{"title":"A humble proposal for GeoAI: Epistemology, methodology, and relevance in curb ramp classification","authors":"Shiloh L. Deitz","doi":"10.1111/cag.70043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.70043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>This paper critically examines how data availability and algorithmic constraints reshape research design, relevance, and outcomes in GIScience. Through a case study of automated curb ramp detection in Seattle, Washington, I demonstrate how the limitations of data, tools, and computational frameworks frequently shape the ambitions of early-stage geographic inquiry. While GeoAI and machine learning offer new possibilities for spatial analysis, they also embed assumptions, value hierarchies, and technical limitations that influence what questions can be asked and what answers can be obtained. Using a random forest model and open-source LiDAR and imagery data, I show how data sparsity, class imbalance, and aspatial training techniques complicate both accuracy and utility. Drawing on visual methods and explainable AI, I interrogate how the algorithm “learned” patterns and where it failed, revealing that AI-identified relevance often diverges from socially meaningful goals. I argue for a reflexive approach to GeoAI—one that embraces error, foregrounds relevance, and resists the allure of algorithmic objectivity. The paper ultimately calls for centering research relevance alongside reproducibility and replicability in spatial data science, advocating for humility in the face of technological complexity</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":47619,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien","volume":"69 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Howard Ramos, Christine Taylhardat, Mark C. J. Stoddart
The 2020s have seen increasing environmental change and it is nearly impossible to deny that human actions are driving it. Individual-level actions are important for mitigating environmental change and facilitating adaptation. However, there is debate over the relationship between perceptions of the risks of environmental change and taking pro-environmental actions that can mitigate them. Few studies examine how perceptions of environmental change influence perceptions of the most effective actions to mitigate environmental change, a mediating step between perception and action. This paper examines these relationships and finds that people are most likely to perceive environmental changes they can experience firsthand, in natural bodies of water and green spaces. It also finds that those who perceive change may be more sceptical of symbolic flagship behaviours than those who are less aware of environmental changes. Findings identify leverage points where environmental education can be most effective in translating perception to pro-environmental action.
{"title":"Perceptions of environmental change and beliefs in the effectiveness of pro-environmental actions","authors":"Howard Ramos, Christine Taylhardat, Mark C. J. Stoddart","doi":"10.1111/cag.70044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>The 2020s have seen increasing environmental change and it is nearly impossible to deny that human actions are driving it. Individual-level actions are important for mitigating environmental change and facilitating adaptation. However, there is debate over the relationship between perceptions of the risks of environmental change and taking pro-environmental actions that can mitigate them. Few studies examine how perceptions of environmental change influence perceptions of the most effective actions to mitigate environmental change, a mediating step between perception and action. This paper examines these relationships and finds that people are most likely to perceive environmental changes they can experience firsthand, in natural bodies of water and green spaces. It also finds that those who perceive change may be more sceptical of symbolic flagship behaviours than those who are less aware of environmental changes. Findings identify leverage points where environmental education can be most effective in translating perception to pro-environmental action.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":47619,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien","volume":"69 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cag.70044","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The cactus hunters: Desire and extinction in the illicit succulent trade By Jared D. Margulies, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 2023. 392 pages. $34.99 (paperback). ISBN: 9781517913991","authors":"Zoë A. Meletis","doi":"10.1111/cag.70042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.70042","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47619,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien","volume":"69 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145469561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gender and toilets are intimately connected. According to the United Nations (UN), access to sanitation, inclusive of toilets, within public spaces is a human right, and tied to the Sustainable Development Goals to achieve gender equality. A framework was developed to assess the provision of toilets in public spaces and includes five criteria: availability; accessibility; affordability; quality and safety; and acceptability, privacy and dignity. The framework links access to sanitation/public toilets and gendered rights. Canada lacks good quality public toilets in most places, including public parks, and there is no research on how Canadian cities consider the needs of women and transgender and gender-diverse people for public toilets in their parks and recreation master plans. Therefore, we undertook a content analysis of parks and recreation master plans of Canadian municipalities using the UN framework. We did so to understand if decision makers consider gendered access to sanitation in public parks, and whether cities are meeting their human rights obligation on toilets as determined by the UN. Our results found there is a planning gap around gendered access to public toilets in planning policies and many municipalities are not meeting their human rights obligations to access to sanitation and gender equality.
{"title":"Gender, toilets, and the planning gap: A United Nations framework analysis of Canadian municipal parks policies","authors":"Shawna Lewkowitz, Jason Gilliland, Stephanie Coen","doi":"10.1111/cag.70036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.70036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Gender and toilets are intimately connected. According to the United Nations (UN), access to sanitation, inclusive of toilets, within public spaces is a human right, and tied to the Sustainable Development Goals to achieve gender equality. A framework was developed to assess the provision of toilets in public spaces and includes five criteria: availability; accessibility; affordability; quality and safety; and acceptability, privacy and dignity. The framework links access to sanitation/public toilets and gendered rights. Canada lacks good quality public toilets in most places, including public parks, and there is no research on how Canadian cities consider the needs of women and transgender and gender-diverse people for public toilets in their parks and recreation master plans. Therefore, we undertook a content analysis of parks and recreation master plans of Canadian municipalities using the UN framework. We did so to understand if decision makers consider gendered access to sanitation in public parks, and whether cities are meeting their human rights obligation on toilets as determined by the UN. Our results found there is a planning gap around gendered access to public toilets in planning policies and many municipalities are not meeting their human rights obligations to access to sanitation and gender equality</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":47619,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien","volume":"69 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cag.70036","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145407256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}