Pub Date : 2021-07-27DOI: 10.1177/14624745211031298
Federico Luis Abiuso
Between the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the City of Buenos Aires (Argentina) had a significant demographic growth due to the strong weight of the migratory component. This article focuses on describing the theoretical frameworks deployed by criminologists and related experts to “racialize” the links between immigration and crime in Archivos de Criminología, Medicina Legal, Psiquiatría y Ciencias Afines, a journal published between 1902 and 1913. In so doing, and inspired by the Southern criminology proposals and reflections, I propose to analyze the criminological travels related to the Italian Positive School, to detail the grounds the thematic links between immigration and crime were based on and, in turn, to empirically illustrate different arguments around criminology as a Northern discipline.
{"title":"Travels of Italian Positive School around the racialization of immigration-crime nexus","authors":"Federico Luis Abiuso","doi":"10.1177/14624745211031298","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211031298","url":null,"abstract":"Between the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the City of Buenos Aires (Argentina) had a significant demographic growth due to the strong weight of the migratory component. This article focuses on describing the theoretical frameworks deployed by criminologists and related experts to “racialize” the links between immigration and crime in Archivos de Criminología, Medicina Legal, Psiquiatría y Ciencias Afines, a journal published between 1902 and 1913. In so doing, and inspired by the Southern criminology proposals and reflections, I propose to analyze the criminological travels related to the Italian Positive School, to detail the grounds the thematic links between immigration and crime were based on and, in turn, to empirically illustrate different arguments around criminology as a Northern discipline.","PeriodicalId":47626,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14624745211031298","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46932267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-26DOI: 10.1177/14624745211035031
L. George Sheppard, Rosemary Ricciardelli
{"title":"David Maguire, Male, Failed, Jailed: Masculinities and ‘Revolving Door’ Imprisonment in the UK","authors":"L. George Sheppard, Rosemary Ricciardelli","doi":"10.1177/14624745211035031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211035031","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47626,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14624745211035031","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48330854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-23DOI: 10.1177/14624745211034568
Shakirah E Hudani
In this article I make the argument that the prison in post-genocide Rwanda is an architectural artefact and a problem-space around which to examine the transitional dilemmas of the post-genocide period. I examine the changing punitive architecture of incarceration in Rwanda’s capital and in secondary urban areas. Looking at the space of the prison in relation to the changing city, I posit that through the penal production of space, the state reconfigures logics of punitive practices and urban governmentality. Changing logics of incarceration are evident in Rwanda today in the deconcentration of the capital, Kigali, to make way for an urban masterplanned order. In analyzing this shift in the visibility of the penal order in Rwanda over time, I contend that the prison constructs the city through its punitive and surveillance-based logic, as much as the city constitutes the prison as a spatially segregated edifice. I examine two sets of governmental spaces and practices that have run through different eras of Rwanda’s colonial, post-independence and post-genocide periods: (a) the prison and punishment, and (b) the reordering of the capital city and urban planning.
{"title":"Carceral urbanism: Reconstructing the architecture of punitive space in post-genocide Rwanda","authors":"Shakirah E Hudani","doi":"10.1177/14624745211034568","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211034568","url":null,"abstract":"In this article I make the argument that the prison in post-genocide Rwanda is an architectural artefact and a problem-space around which to examine the transitional dilemmas of the post-genocide period. I examine the changing punitive architecture of incarceration in Rwanda’s capital and in secondary urban areas. Looking at the space of the prison in relation to the changing city, I posit that through the penal production of space, the state reconfigures logics of punitive practices and urban governmentality. Changing logics of incarceration are evident in Rwanda today in the deconcentration of the capital, Kigali, to make way for an urban masterplanned order. In analyzing this shift in the visibility of the penal order in Rwanda over time, I contend that the prison constructs the city through its punitive and surveillance-based logic, as much as the city constitutes the prison as a spatially segregated edifice. I examine two sets of governmental spaces and practices that have run through different eras of Rwanda’s colonial, post-independence and post-genocide periods: (a) the prison and punishment, and (b) the reordering of the capital city and urban planning.","PeriodicalId":47626,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14624745211034568","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44861115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-23DOI: 10.1177/14624745211029362
G. Gonzalez
Social support is often cited as among the most important factors in successful adjustment to prison, reentry, and overall desistance. Yet, few studies have sought to explore the impact of familial social support on incarcerated persons’ experiences in solitary confinement. Analyzing the narratives of men housed in isolation units in one Northwestern state, the present study identifies the variety of experiences they have with social support during isolation, particularly focusing on the prison’s role in structuring relationships between incarcerated persons and their loved ones. Findings reveal that standard communication restrictions in solitary confinement have disparate impacts on differently situated persons living in prisons. Those who are able to maintain familial attachments are able to cope with isolation, first, by maintaining roles in prosocial webs, and second, by accessing material and emotional support, advocacy, and psychological stability. In spite of these benefits, policies and procedures in solitary confinement exacerbate the imprisonment experience and yield negative consequences for prison life, health, family, and prison operations.
{"title":"Who has the power? Manipulating and reclaiming social support in solitary confinement","authors":"G. Gonzalez","doi":"10.1177/14624745211029362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211029362","url":null,"abstract":"Social support is often cited as among the most important factors in successful adjustment to prison, reentry, and overall desistance. Yet, few studies have sought to explore the impact of familial social support on incarcerated persons’ experiences in solitary confinement. Analyzing the narratives of men housed in isolation units in one Northwestern state, the present study identifies the variety of experiences they have with social support during isolation, particularly focusing on the prison’s role in structuring relationships between incarcerated persons and their loved ones. Findings reveal that standard communication restrictions in solitary confinement have disparate impacts on differently situated persons living in prisons. Those who are able to maintain familial attachments are able to cope with isolation, first, by maintaining roles in prosocial webs, and second, by accessing material and emotional support, advocacy, and psychological stability. In spite of these benefits, policies and procedures in solitary confinement exacerbate the imprisonment experience and yield negative consequences for prison life, health, family, and prison operations.","PeriodicalId":47626,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14624745211029362","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46405380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-23DOI: 10.1177/14624745211034554
Daniel LaChance
violent, mentally and physically healthier than others also keeping them from using or dealing drugs in order to maintain parental relationship and protect their children. Through observation of mother-child interactions both inside and outside, Rahimipour Anaraki reveals that the repressive power exercised in prison also affects children of incarcerated mothers. Regulations and disciplines to structure inmate’s life in prison were applied to children as well, including the bedtimes, mealtimes, television rules and rules about what could be done in one’s cell. Children had no play area, they had to stay on the unit with their mothers. Interviews with women in prison are moving, especially mothers who are on death row and had to give up their children either to their families or to caregivers. The book reveals that patterns in the control of prisoners both before and after the revolution have persistently relied on the body. Policies such as methadone maintenance treatment and the presence of children keep the bodies and spirits of the prisoners controllable and dependable. But usually there are no rehabilitation programs or supporting educational programs, or they are too poorly equipped and unsuitable to heal the delinquent past of the prisoners or remedy the problems of poverty. Although these prisoners (contrary to political prisoners) are not tortured, the pain they suffer is no less significant. The author argues, and well demonstrates, that prison reflects society. Prisoners are differentiated according to their wealth, power, social capital, gender, sexuality and are not treated equally. For example, violent criminals, especially drug traffickers, are kings of prison with their palaces inside the prison. They are respected by other prisoners and even recruit their novice young men as petty servants. Homosexuality is stigmatized in prison like in society, but the stigma of female homosexuality is even more acute. Prison in Iran. A Known Unknown is a welcome and rare attempt to study ‘ordinary’ prisons and prisoners in Iran. Through her investigations, observations and interviews Rahimipour Anaraki has successfully depicted the sufferings of prisoners, especially women’s and children’s, as a reflection of a society in which social inequalities are paramount and where prison’s raison d’être is not to educate but to punish, not to integrate but to exclude.
{"title":"Ashley T Rubin, The Deviant Prison: Philadelphia’s Eastern State Penitentiary and The Origins of America’s Modern Penal System, 1829–1913","authors":"Daniel LaChance","doi":"10.1177/14624745211034554","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211034554","url":null,"abstract":"violent, mentally and physically healthier than others also keeping them from using or dealing drugs in order to maintain parental relationship and protect their children. Through observation of mother-child interactions both inside and outside, Rahimipour Anaraki reveals that the repressive power exercised in prison also affects children of incarcerated mothers. Regulations and disciplines to structure inmate’s life in prison were applied to children as well, including the bedtimes, mealtimes, television rules and rules about what could be done in one’s cell. Children had no play area, they had to stay on the unit with their mothers. Interviews with women in prison are moving, especially mothers who are on death row and had to give up their children either to their families or to caregivers. The book reveals that patterns in the control of prisoners both before and after the revolution have persistently relied on the body. Policies such as methadone maintenance treatment and the presence of children keep the bodies and spirits of the prisoners controllable and dependable. But usually there are no rehabilitation programs or supporting educational programs, or they are too poorly equipped and unsuitable to heal the delinquent past of the prisoners or remedy the problems of poverty. Although these prisoners (contrary to political prisoners) are not tortured, the pain they suffer is no less significant. The author argues, and well demonstrates, that prison reflects society. Prisoners are differentiated according to their wealth, power, social capital, gender, sexuality and are not treated equally. For example, violent criminals, especially drug traffickers, are kings of prison with their palaces inside the prison. They are respected by other prisoners and even recruit their novice young men as petty servants. Homosexuality is stigmatized in prison like in society, but the stigma of female homosexuality is even more acute. Prison in Iran. A Known Unknown is a welcome and rare attempt to study ‘ordinary’ prisons and prisoners in Iran. Through her investigations, observations and interviews Rahimipour Anaraki has successfully depicted the sufferings of prisoners, especially women’s and children’s, as a reflection of a society in which social inequalities are paramount and where prison’s raison d’être is not to educate but to punish, not to integrate but to exclude.","PeriodicalId":47626,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14624745211034554","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42069086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-12DOI: 10.1177/14624745211020818
E. Aizpurua, M. Rogan
Despite the increasing focus on prison inspection and monitoring bodies in international law and policy, little is known about their operations in practice. This study contributes to fill this gap by examining how countries of the European Union (EU) have responded to these demands, paying special attention to one of the central tasks of these bodies: the making of recommendations. To do so, we used data from the first EU-wide survey of prison oversight bodies, with responses from all Member States. Our findings reveal that recommendations-making is a key part of the work of these bodies. They also provide evidences that the approach to dialogue between these bodies and prison authorities advocated in the legislation is taking place on the ground.
{"title":"Rights protection in prisons: Understanding recommendations-making by prison inspection and monitoring bodies in the European Union","authors":"E. Aizpurua, M. Rogan","doi":"10.1177/14624745211020818","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211020818","url":null,"abstract":"Despite the increasing focus on prison inspection and monitoring bodies in international law and policy, little is known about their operations in practice. This study contributes to fill this gap by examining how countries of the European Union (EU) have responded to these demands, paying special attention to one of the central tasks of these bodies: the making of recommendations. To do so, we used data from the first EU-wide survey of prison oversight bodies, with responses from all Member States. Our findings reveal that recommendations-making is a key part of the work of these bodies. They also provide evidences that the approach to dialogue between these bodies and prison authorities advocated in the legislation is taking place on the ground.","PeriodicalId":47626,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14624745211020818","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47756495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-09DOI: 10.1177/14624745211023457
Spencer J Weinreich
This essay revisits Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon, perhaps the foundational figure of the study of the prison, to recover a dimension of the project wholly omitted in Michel Foucault’s canonical reading in Discipline and Punish. Nowhere does Foucault mention Bentham’s insistence that the prison be run by a private contractor. With Bentham's penal theory characteristically derived from his account of human psychology, the contract and private profit are essential to the functioning of the Panopticon, because they align the jailer's duty with their self-interest. Bentham built profit and market imperatives into the fabric of the Panopticon, always envisioned as a place of economic production. The contract-Panopticon and its political economy are vital antecedents to the neoliberal penality theorized by Loïc Wacquant and Bernard E. Harcourt, even as they problematize the statism inherited from Foucault and the chronological implications of the prefix “neo.” Bentham was only the theorist of a marketization of governance pervasive in his own time and ever since, raising the question of whether punishment has ever been a purely state function.
本文重访了杰里米·边沁的圆形监狱，也许是监狱研究的基础人物，以恢复米歇尔·福柯的经典阅读《纪律与惩罚》中完全遗漏的项目的一个维度。福柯没有提到边沁坚持监狱由私人承包商经营。边沁的刑罚理论主要来源于他对人类心理学的描述，契约和私人利润对圆形监狱的运作至关重要，因为它们将狱卒的责任与他们的自身利益联系在一起。边沁将利润和市场法则融入到圆形监狱的结构中，圆形监狱一直被设想为经济生产的场所。契约式的圆形监狱及其政治经济学是Loïc Wacquant和Bernard E. Harcourt提出的新自由主义刑罚理论的重要先驱，即使他们对继承自福柯的国家主义和前缀“neo”的年代含义提出了质疑。边沁只是在他的时代和以后普遍存在的治理市场化的理论家，提出了惩罚是否曾经是纯粹的国家功能的问题。
{"title":"Panopticon, Inc.: Jeremy Bentham, contract management, and (neo)liberal penality","authors":"Spencer J Weinreich","doi":"10.1177/14624745211023457","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211023457","url":null,"abstract":"This essay revisits Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon, perhaps the foundational figure of the study of the prison, to recover a dimension of the project wholly omitted in Michel Foucault’s canonical reading in Discipline and Punish. Nowhere does Foucault mention Bentham’s insistence that the prison be run by a private contractor. With Bentham's penal theory characteristically derived from his account of human psychology, the contract and private profit are essential to the functioning of the Panopticon, because they align the jailer's duty with their self-interest. Bentham built profit and market imperatives into the fabric of the Panopticon, always envisioned as a place of economic production. The contract-Panopticon and its political economy are vital antecedents to the neoliberal penality theorized by Loïc Wacquant and Bernard E. Harcourt, even as they problematize the statism inherited from Foucault and the chronological implications of the prefix “neo.” Bentham was only the theorist of a marketization of governance pervasive in his own time and ever since, raising the question of whether punishment has ever been a purely state function.","PeriodicalId":47626,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14624745211023457","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42637428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-06DOI: 10.1177/14624745211035837
M. Cracknell
The Offender Rehabilitation Act (ORA) 2014 has extended post-release supervision to all individuals serving short sentences in England and Wales – a cohort who previously faced neglect within the criminal justice system. This empirical study uses a case study approach to explore the resettlement experiences of individuals subject to this new legislation, understanding how individuals circulate and re-cycle between a range of services and agencies in the community, further illuminating upon the reality of repeat ‘revolving door’ imprisonment. Drawing upon Cohen's ‘net widening’ analogy, this article posits that collectively the array of services involved in an individual's resettlement form a ‘resettlement net’, which segregates individuals in the community through control and surveillance functions, extending the carceral boundary of the prison firmly into the community. Welfare-orientated organisations become compelled to ‘braid’ welfare responses alongside penal functions in order to operate within the resettlement net. This article also explores some of the difficulties that individuals experience as they navigate the resettlement net, including informal forms of exclusion, and the wear and tear of the net, which undermines the rhetoric of care envisioned by this legislation, and drives individuals deeper into the mesh of carceral control.
{"title":"The resettlement net: ‘revolving door’ imprisonment and carceral (re)circulation","authors":"M. Cracknell","doi":"10.1177/14624745211035837","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211035837","url":null,"abstract":"The Offender Rehabilitation Act (ORA) 2014 has extended post-release supervision to all individuals serving short sentences in England and Wales – a cohort who previously faced neglect within the criminal justice system. This empirical study uses a case study approach to explore the resettlement experiences of individuals subject to this new legislation, understanding how individuals circulate and re-cycle between a range of services and agencies in the community, further illuminating upon the reality of repeat ‘revolving door’ imprisonment. Drawing upon Cohen's ‘net widening’ analogy, this article posits that collectively the array of services involved in an individual's resettlement form a ‘resettlement net’, which segregates individuals in the community through control and surveillance functions, extending the carceral boundary of the prison firmly into the community. Welfare-orientated organisations become compelled to ‘braid’ welfare responses alongside penal functions in order to operate within the resettlement net. This article also explores some of the difficulties that individuals experience as they navigate the resettlement net, including informal forms of exclusion, and the wear and tear of the net, which undermines the rhetoric of care envisioned by this legislation, and drives individuals deeper into the mesh of carceral control.","PeriodicalId":47626,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47391990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.1177/14624745211029370
Timothy Griffin
The author compared American criminologists’ stated reasons for death penalty support or opposition with those of the general public as reported by Gallup pollsters. While experts were overwhelmingly more likely to oppose capital punishment, the rationale for opposition or support were largely comparable for both groups, albeit with some potentially informative differences. As is the case with the general public, the most common reasons for experts' opposition are moral beliefs, concerns about system errors, and the unfair application of the death penalty. Similarly, among the small minority of experts who expressed (often qualified) support for the death penalty, the favored rationale is simple retributive justice—exactly as is the case with the general public. The results show that, not only is opposition to the death penalty among experts not absolute, but the underlying rationale of expert dissenters is arguably a partial bridge to greater public-expert symbiosis on this highly contentious and divisive issue. The radical “newsmaking criminology” contribution of these findings and their ramifications is that the entirety of expert perspective is arguably as consistent with disciplined retention of the death penalty as it is with strict abolition. Future research could reveal even more expert sympathy for retributive thinking, and thus greater affinity with public views, than might be assumed.
{"title":"Comparing expert versus general public rationale for death penalty support and opposition: Is expert perspective on capital punishment consistent with “disciplined retention”?","authors":"Timothy Griffin","doi":"10.1177/14624745211029370","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211029370","url":null,"abstract":"The author compared American criminologists’ stated reasons for death penalty support or opposition with those of the general public as reported by Gallup pollsters. While experts were overwhelmingly more likely to oppose capital punishment, the rationale for opposition or support were largely comparable for both groups, albeit with some potentially informative differences. As is the case with the general public, the most common reasons for experts' opposition are moral beliefs, concerns about system errors, and the unfair application of the death penalty. Similarly, among the small minority of experts who expressed (often qualified) support for the death penalty, the favored rationale is simple retributive justice—exactly as is the case with the general public. The results show that, not only is opposition to the death penalty among experts not absolute, but the underlying rationale of expert dissenters is arguably a partial bridge to greater public-expert symbiosis on this highly contentious and divisive issue. The radical “newsmaking criminology” contribution of these findings and their ramifications is that the entirety of expert perspective is arguably as consistent with disciplined retention of the death penalty as it is with strict abolition. Future research could reveal even more expert sympathy for retributive thinking, and thus greater affinity with public views, than might be assumed.","PeriodicalId":47626,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44448596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.1177/1462474520953676
William Bülow, Netanel Dagan
Retributivism is one of the most prevalent theories in contemporary penal theory. However, despite its popularity it is frequently argued that too little attention has been paid to the implications of retributivism for prison management and prison life, including prison visits and furlough. More so, it has been questioned both whether the various forms of retributivism found in the philosophical literature on criminal punishment have anything to say about what prison life ought to be like and whether they are able to criticize deeply contested rules and practices, such as those that deny inmates contact with family-members for the sake of prison discipline. In this paper, we argue that prison visits and furlough have a crucial role in a prison system based on retributivist principles. In particular, we argue that the communicative theory of punishment has important theoretical resources for proving a strong and compelling rationale for both furlough and visitation on retributivist grounds. Besides exploring this rationale, we also discuss the practical implications of this view for the penal policy.
{"title":"From rehabilitation to penal communication: The role of furlough and visitation within a retributivist framework","authors":"William Bülow, Netanel Dagan","doi":"10.1177/1462474520953676","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520953676","url":null,"abstract":"Retributivism is one of the most prevalent theories in contemporary penal theory. However, despite its popularity it is frequently argued that too little attention has been paid to the implications of retributivism for prison management and prison life, including prison visits and furlough. More so, it has been questioned both whether the various forms of retributivism found in the philosophical literature on criminal punishment have anything to say about what prison life ought to be like and whether they are able to criticize deeply contested rules and practices, such as those that deny inmates contact with family-members for the sake of prison discipline. In this paper, we argue that prison visits and furlough have a crucial role in a prison system based on retributivist principles. In particular, we argue that the communicative theory of punishment has important theoretical resources for proving a strong and compelling rationale for both furlough and visitation on retributivist grounds. Besides exploring this rationale, we also discuss the practical implications of this view for the penal policy.","PeriodicalId":47626,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1462474520953676","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47370558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：