Pub Date : 2022-07-13DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2022.2095657
Jolan Kegelaers, P. Wylleman, S. Defruyt, Lynn Praet, N. Stambulova, M. Torregrossa, G. Kenttä, K. De Brandt
{"title":"The mental health of student-athletes: a systematic scoping review","authors":"Jolan Kegelaers, P. Wylleman, S. Defruyt, Lynn Praet, N. Stambulova, M. Torregrossa, G. Kenttä, K. De Brandt","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2022.2095657","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2022.2095657","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49058785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-07DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2022.2092884
E. Mosley, S. Laborde
{"title":"A scoping review of heart rate variability in sport and exercise psychology","authors":"E. Mosley, S. Laborde","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2022.2092884","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2022.2092884","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48317316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-13DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2022.2081929
Leslie Podlog, Ross Wadey, Jeff Caron, John J. Fraser, Andreas Ivarsson, John Heil, Stefanie Podlog, Tallie Casucci
ABSTRACT
Psychological readiness to return to sport (RTS) after injury is a critical and timely area of research that has received significant research attention of late. Although research on psychological readiness to RTS has burgeoned in recent years, there remains a lack of conceptual clarity on what psychological readiness is. As such, our aims in this review of the state of the art (consistent with the typology of Grant and Booth) are threefold. First, we articulate key conceptual issues and questions regarding the nature of psychological readiness and offer a preliminary nomothetic definition of the construct. Based on the definition, we advance several hypotheses for testing in future research. Second, we discuss research examining correlates of psychological readiness and, third, we look at empirical work focused on outcomes of psychological readiness. Our review draws upon literature spanning various disciplines and cultures/languages.
{"title":"Psychological readiness to return to sport following injury: a state-of-the-art review","authors":"Leslie Podlog, Ross Wadey, Jeff Caron, John J. Fraser, Andreas Ivarsson, John Heil, Stefanie Podlog, Tallie Casucci","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2022.2081929","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2022.2081929","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p><p>Psychological readiness to return to sport (RTS) after injury is a critical and timely area of research that has received significant research attention of late. Although research on psychological readiness to RTS has burgeoned in recent years, there remains a lack of conceptual clarity on what psychological readiness is. As such, our aims in this review of the state of the art (consistent with the typology of Grant and Booth) are threefold. First, we articulate key conceptual issues and questions regarding the nature of psychological readiness and offer a preliminary nomothetic definition of the construct. Based on the definition, we advance several hypotheses for testing in future research. Second, we discuss research examining correlates of psychological readiness and, third, we look at empirical work focused on outcomes of psychological readiness. Our review draws upon literature spanning various disciplines and cultures/languages.</p>","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138517811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-17DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2022.2070861
M. Bruner, Colin D. McLaren, Jordan T. Sutcliffe, L. Gardner, S. Vella
{"title":"Conceptualizing and measuring positive youth development in sport: a scoping review","authors":"M. Bruner, Colin D. McLaren, Jordan T. Sutcliffe, L. Gardner, S. Vella","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2022.2070861","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2022.2070861","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48701762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-04-22DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2022.2062678
André Nicklas, R. Rein, B. Noël, Stefanie Klatt
{"title":"A meta-analysis on immediate effects of attentional focus on motor tasks performance","authors":"André Nicklas, R. Rein, B. Noël, Stefanie Klatt","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2022.2062678","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2022.2062678","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48853076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-16DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2022.2051151
Alyson J. Crozier, M. Carmichael, Jessica R. Townsend, Joe M. Bingham, Brad J. Stenner
{"title":"Norms in sport: a scoping review","authors":"Alyson J. Crozier, M. Carmichael, Jessica R. Townsend, Joe M. Bingham, Brad J. Stenner","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2022.2051151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2022.2051151","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44657362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-22DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2022.2042839
Mariane F. B. Bacelar, J. Parma, William M. Murrah, Matthew W. Miller
{"title":"Meta-analyzing enhanced expectancies on motor learning: positive effects but methodological concerns","authors":"Mariane F. B. Bacelar, J. Parma, William M. Murrah, Matthew W. Miller","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2022.2042839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2022.2042839","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44642740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-19DOI: 10.1080/1750984X.2022.2028305
N. Holt, Kurtis Pankow, I. Ormond, Helene Jørgensen, Colin J. Deal, Shannon R. Pynn
ABSTRACT The purposes of this paper were to (a) describe and assess the use of grounded theory methodology (GTM) in sport psychology over the past 11 years and (b) provide some guidance for best practices moving forward. Following a brief summary of the history of GTM, we present the results of a rapid review of seven sport psychology journals from 2009 to 2021. A total of 35 articles that made claims regarding the use of GTM as a methodology were retained. The retained articles were assessed using 11 criteria. Overall, the methodological completeness of GTM studies in sport psychology appears to have improved over the past decade. Twenty-two of the 35 articles met all, or all but one, of the criteria. Thirteen articles did not meet two or more of the criteria. In terms of areas for improvement, the least widely reported procedures were theoretical sampling (reported in 22 of 35 studies), theoretical saturation (22 of 35 studies), and assessment of theory (22 of 35 studies). Furthermore, the sophisticated positioning of theoretical sensitivity was sometimes lacking in the articles. We discuss ways in which researchers can increase the conceptual and theoretical sophistication of methodologically sound GTM studies.
{"title":"Grounded theory","authors":"N. Holt, Kurtis Pankow, I. Ormond, Helene Jørgensen, Colin J. Deal, Shannon R. Pynn","doi":"10.1080/1750984X.2022.2028305","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2022.2028305","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purposes of this paper were to (a) describe and assess the use of grounded theory methodology (GTM) in sport psychology over the past 11 years and (b) provide some guidance for best practices moving forward. Following a brief summary of the history of GTM, we present the results of a rapid review of seven sport psychology journals from 2009 to 2021. A total of 35 articles that made claims regarding the use of GTM as a methodology were retained. The retained articles were assessed using 11 criteria. Overall, the methodological completeness of GTM studies in sport psychology appears to have improved over the past decade. Twenty-two of the 35 articles met all, or all but one, of the criteria. Thirteen articles did not meet two or more of the criteria. In terms of areas for improvement, the least widely reported procedures were theoretical sampling (reported in 22 of 35 studies), theoretical saturation (22 of 35 studies), and assessment of theory (22 of 35 studies). Furthermore, the sophisticated positioning of theoretical sensitivity was sometimes lacking in the articles. We discuss ways in which researchers can increase the conceptual and theoretical sophistication of methodologically sound GTM studies.","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"15 1","pages":"199 - 225"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42665879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-02DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2022.2031252
Lara H. Mossman, G. Slemp, Kelsey J. Lewis, R. Colla, P. O’Halloran
Drawing from self-determination theory (SDT) and a database of 1,320 correlations across 131 independent samples ( N = 38,844), we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of coach autonomy support in sport and exercise settings. Results showed autonomy support was strongly positively associated with athlete well-being and negatively associated with distress. Consistent with SDT, meta-analyzed correlations were strongest for autonomous forms of athlete motivation ( ρ = .39) and weaker for controlled forms of motivation (introjected regulation ρ = .16, external regulation ρ = − .01), and negative with amotivation ( ρ = − .19). We found strong positive associations between autonomy support and athlete basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness and very strong associations between autonomy support and other climate or behavioral supports for athlete basic psychological needs: competence support; relatedness support; structure; involvement; and task- involving climates. E ff ects were not moderated by culture, with collectivist and individualist cultures generally yielding e ff ects in the strong range ( ρ ≥ .35), providing support for the assumption within SDT of universal bene fi ts of autonomy support. E ff ects were also not moderated across types of sport. We discuss implications of the review and suggest coach autonomy support is consistent with environments supporting autonomous motivation, basic psychological needs, and well-being. intrinsic motivation), less related to external regulation, and negatively associated with amotivation. support will exhibit main e ff ect associations consistent with SDT propositions: positive with basic needs, well-being, and negatively with ill-being and need frustration. We expect that autonomy support will predict all three basic needs — not just autonomy — because self-governed behaviors made possible by autonomy support allow people to seek out and fi nd ful fi lment across all three needs, including competence and relatedness (Bartholomew al., Ryan &
{"title":"Autonomy support in sport and exercise settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Lara H. Mossman, G. Slemp, Kelsey J. Lewis, R. Colla, P. O’Halloran","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2022.2031252","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2022.2031252","url":null,"abstract":"Drawing from self-determination theory (SDT) and a database of 1,320 correlations across 131 independent samples ( N = 38,844), we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of coach autonomy support in sport and exercise settings. Results showed autonomy support was strongly positively associated with athlete well-being and negatively associated with distress. Consistent with SDT, meta-analyzed correlations were strongest for autonomous forms of athlete motivation ( ρ = .39) and weaker for controlled forms of motivation (introjected regulation ρ = .16, external regulation ρ = − .01), and negative with amotivation ( ρ = − .19). We found strong positive associations between autonomy support and athlete basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness and very strong associations between autonomy support and other climate or behavioral supports for athlete basic psychological needs: competence support; relatedness support; structure; involvement; and task- involving climates. E ff ects were not moderated by culture, with collectivist and individualist cultures generally yielding e ff ects in the strong range ( ρ ≥ .35), providing support for the assumption within SDT of universal bene fi ts of autonomy support. E ff ects were also not moderated across types of sport. We discuss implications of the review and suggest coach autonomy support is consistent with environments supporting autonomous motivation, basic psychological needs, and well-being. intrinsic motivation), less related to external regulation, and negatively associated with amotivation. support will exhibit main e ff ect associations consistent with SDT propositions: positive with basic needs, well-being, and negatively with ill-being and need frustration. We expect that autonomy support will predict all three basic needs — not just autonomy — because self-governed behaviors made possible by autonomy support allow people to seek out and fi nd ful fi lment across all three needs, including competence and relatedness (Bartholomew al., Ryan &","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46442296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-02DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2022.2028306
S. Vella, Elizabeth C Mayland, M. Schweickle, Jordan T. Sutcliffe, Desmond McEwan, C. Swann
There has been a rapid proliferation of empirical research on the relationship between sport participation and mental health. As a result of this movement, there has been an increased focus on the constructs that can predict or explain mental health outcomes in sport. Psychological safety in sport is among the constructs surfaced in the movement. Despite this, there is a considerable lack of conceptual clarity regarding how to define psychological safety and how it can be fostered in sport. As such, the aim of this study was to provide conceptual clarity of the term psychological safety in the context of sport. To achieve this aim, we first systematically searched for all currently available studies that have discussed psychological safety in a sport context. Then, a concept analysis approach was applied wherein the definitions, attributes, antecedents, and consequences were thematically analysed across 67 studies. As a result of this synthesis, psychological safety in sport was conceptualised as a continuous, group level construct that is perceived (and reported) at an individual level. We also provide a descriptive model of psychological safety in sport that we hope lends clarity and debate to the field moving forward.
{"title":"Psychological safety in sport: a systematic review and concept analysis","authors":"S. Vella, Elizabeth C Mayland, M. Schweickle, Jordan T. Sutcliffe, Desmond McEwan, C. Swann","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2022.2028306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2022.2028306","url":null,"abstract":"There has been a rapid proliferation of empirical research on the relationship between sport participation and mental health. As a result of this movement, there has been an increased focus on the constructs that can predict or explain mental health outcomes in sport. Psychological safety in sport is among the constructs surfaced in the movement. Despite this, there is a considerable lack of conceptual clarity regarding how to define psychological safety and how it can be fostered in sport. As such, the aim of this study was to provide conceptual clarity of the term psychological safety in the context of sport. To achieve this aim, we first systematically searched for all currently available studies that have discussed psychological safety in a sport context. Then, a concept analysis approach was applied wherein the definitions, attributes, antecedents, and consequences were thematically analysed across 67 studies. As a result of this synthesis, psychological safety in sport was conceptualised as a continuous, group level construct that is perceived (and reported) at an individual level. We also provide a descriptive model of psychological safety in sport that we hope lends clarity and debate to the field moving forward.","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48569211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号