International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology最新文献

英文中文

Meta-analysis 荟萃分析

IF 5.5 2区心理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI: 10.1080/1750984X.2021.1966824

M. Hagger

ABSTRACT The sheer volume of available research and shifts toward evidence-based practice has led researchers and practitioners in sport and exercise psychology to rely increasingly on meta-analyses to summarize current knowledge, provide future research directions, and inform policy and practice. These issues highlight the imperative of precision and integrity in the conduct of meta-analyses in the discipline. This review provides a summary of meta-analytic methods relevant to sport and exercise psychology, identifies important issues and advances in meta-analytic methods, and provides best practice guidelines for meta-analysts to consider when synthesizing research in the discipline. In Part I, I provide an overview of the basic principles of meta-analysis and direct readers to accessible, non-technical treatments of the topic. In Part II, I introduce several key issues in meta-analysis and summarize the latest advances in each: effective assessment of heterogeneity; testing for moderators; dealing with dependency; evaluating publication bias and tracking down ‘fugitive literature’; and assessing sample size in meta-analysis. I also cover two emerging topics: testing theories using meta-analysis and open science and transparency practices in meta-analysis. I conclude the discussion of each issue by providing best practice guidelines, and refer the reader to further accessible texts to augment knowledge and understanding.

摘要：大量可用的研究和向循证实践的转变，导致运动和锻炼心理学的研究人员和从业者越来越依赖元分析来总结当前知识，提供未来的研究方向，并为政策和实践提供信息。这些问题突出了在学科中进行荟萃分析时准确性和完整性的必要性。这篇综述总结了与运动和锻炼心理学相关的元分析方法，确定了元分析方法的重要问题和进展，并为元分析师在综合该学科的研究时提供了最佳实践指南。在第一部分中，我概述了荟萃分析的基本原则，并引导读者了解该主题的可访问的、非技术性的处理方法。在第二部分中，我介绍了荟萃分析中的几个关键问题，并总结了每个问题的最新进展：异质性的有效评估；主持人测试；处理依赖性问题；评估出版偏见并追踪“逃亡文学”；以及在荟萃分析中评估样本量。我还涵盖了两个新兴的主题：使用荟萃分析的测试理论和荟萃分析中的开放科学和透明度实践。我通过提供最佳实践指南来结束对每个问题的讨论，并向读者介绍更多可访问的文本，以增加知识和理解。

{"title":"Meta-analysis","authors":"M. Hagger","doi":"10.1080/1750984X.2021.1966824","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1966824","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The sheer volume of available research and shifts toward evidence-based practice has led researchers and practitioners in sport and exercise psychology to rely increasingly on meta-analyses to summarize current knowledge, provide future research directions, and inform policy and practice. These issues highlight the imperative of precision and integrity in the conduct of meta-analyses in the discipline. This review provides a summary of meta-analytic methods relevant to sport and exercise psychology, identifies important issues and advances in meta-analytic methods, and provides best practice guidelines for meta-analysts to consider when synthesizing research in the discipline. In Part I, I provide an overview of the basic principles of meta-analysis and direct readers to accessible, non-technical treatments of the topic. In Part II, I introduce several key issues in meta-analysis and summarize the latest advances in each: effective assessment of heterogeneity; testing for moderators; dealing with dependency; evaluating publication bias and tracking down ‘fugitive literature’; and assessing sample size in meta-analysis. I also cover two emerging topics: testing theories using meta-analysis and open science and transparency practices in meta-analysis. I conclude the discussion of each issue by providing best practice guidelines, and refer the reader to further accessible texts to augment knowledge and understanding.","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"15 1","pages":"120 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49198362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Systematic review methods 系统评价方法

IF 5.5 2区心理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI: 10.1080/1750984X.2021.1966823

K. Gunnell, V. J. Belcourt, J. Tomasone, L. Weeks

ABSTRACT Increasingly, sport and exercise psychology researchers are using systematic review methods to examine the evidence on a particular topic. Unfortunately, not all systematic reviews are created equal and the methodological quality of the review will depend on the quality of the methods used in the review process. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of essential methods and resources used in systematic reviews that serve to increase transparency, replicability, robustness, ethics, and translation of results. To achieve our purpose, we describe aspects of the systematic review process including best standards for planning and conducting a systematic review, coherence, literature searches, article screening, data extraction, reporting guidelines, open science practices, publication ethics, and disseminating results. In providing an overview of these methods for systematic reviews, we highlight relevant literature, resources, and examples from the sport and exercise psychology literature. Finally, we offer nine guidelines to follow to enhance systematic review methods used in sport and exercise psychology.

越来越多的运动和运动心理学研究人员正在使用系统综述方法来检查特定主题的证据。不幸的是，并不是所有的系统评审都是平等的，评审的方法学质量将取决于评审过程中使用的方法的质量。本文的目的是概述系统评价中使用的基本方法和资源，这些方法和资源有助于增加结果的透明度、可复制性、稳健性、伦理和翻译。为了达到我们的目的，我们描述了系统评价过程的各个方面，包括计划和实施系统评价的最佳标准、一致性、文献检索、文章筛选、数据提取、报告指南、开放科学实践、出版伦理和传播结果。在为系统综述提供这些方法的概述时，我们强调了相关的文献、资源和运动和运动心理学文献中的例子。最后，我们提供了九项指导方针，以加强在运动和运动心理学中使用的系统评价方法。

引用次数: 2

The relationship between self-talk and affective processes in sports: a scoping review 体育运动中自我对话与情感过程的关系:一个范围综述

IF 5.5 2区心理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2021.2021543

Julian Fritsch, Katharina Feil, Darko Jekauc, Alexander T. Latinjak, Antonis Hatzigeorgiadis

ABSTRACT

A perspective on self-talk introduced in the literature distinguishes between organic self-talk and strategic self-talk. Based on this perspective, the purpose of the present scoping review was to (a) give a comprehensive overview of studies investigating the relationship between organic self-talk and affective processes and (b) review the effectiveness of strategic self-talk to regulate affective processes. A systematic search was conducted with the databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus. As a result, 44 articles with 46 relevant studies were included for an in-depth analysis. Thirty studies focused on organic self-talk and 15 on strategic self-talk, while one study focused on both. With regard to organic self-talk, the results indicate a relatively consistent concurrence of the valence of self-talk and affective processes. In addition, various functions of self-talk relate to emotion regulation. For strategic self-talk, intervention studies, which were limited to the regulation of anxiety, revealed mixed effects. Based on the results, we discuss how the integration of various established theories in sport psychology in the new self-talk perspective might facilitate a more systematic approach when studying the relationship between self-talk and affective processes.

文献中引入的自我对话视角将自我对话分为有机自我对话和策略自我对话。基于这一观点，本研究的目的是(a)对有机自我对话与情感过程之间关系的研究进行全面概述，(b)回顾战略性自我对话调节情感过程的有效性。系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、PsycINFO和SPORTDiscus数据库。因此，纳入44篇文章和46项相关研究进行深入分析。30项研究关注有机自我对话，15项研究关注战略自我对话，还有一项研究关注两者。在有机自言自语方面，结果表明自言自语的效价与情感过程具有相对一致的一致性。此外，自言自语的各种功能都与情绪调节有关。对于策略性自我对话，干预研究(仅限于对焦虑的调节)显示出混合效果。在此基础上，我们讨论了在新的自我对话视角下，如何整合运动心理学中各种已建立的理论，从而在研究自我对话与情感过程之间的关系时提供更系统的方法。

{"title":"The relationship between self-talk and affective processes in sports: a scoping review","authors":"Julian Fritsch, Katharina Feil, Darko Jekauc, Alexander T. Latinjak, Antonis Hatzigeorgiadis","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2021.2021543","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2021.2021543","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTA perspective on self-talk introduced in the literature distinguishes between organic self-talk and strategic self-talk. Based on this perspective, the purpose of the present scoping review was to (a) give a comprehensive overview of studies investigating the relationship between organic self-talk and affective processes and (b) review the effectiveness of strategic self-talk to regulate affective processes. A systematic search was conducted with the databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus. As a result, 44 articles with 46 relevant studies were included for an in-depth analysis. Thirty studies focused on organic self-talk and 15 on strategic self-talk, while one study focused on both. With regard to organic self-talk, the results indicate a relatively consistent concurrence of the valence of self-talk and affective processes. In addition, various functions of self-talk relate to emotion regulation. For strategic self-talk, intervention studies, which were limited to the regulation of anxiety, revealed mixed effects. Based on the results, we discuss how the integration of various established theories in sport psychology in the new self-talk perspective might facilitate a more systematic approach when studying the relationship between self-talk and affective processes.","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138517822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Youth sport dropout according to the Process-Person-Context-Time model: a systematic review 基于过程-人-情境-时间模型的青少年体育辍学:系统回顾

IF 5.5 2区心理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2021.2012817

Kylie Moulds, S. Galloway, S. Abbott, S. Cobley

引用次数: 6

Scoping reviews and rapid reviews 范围审查和快速审查

IF 5.5 2区心理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI: 10.1080/1750984X.2021.1964095

C. Sabiston, Madison F. Vani, Melissa de Jonge, Amy E. Nesbitt

ABSTRACT Scoping reviews and rapid reviews are intentional approaches to systematically synthesize research. In sport and exercise psychology, scoping reviews can summarize information to describe what is known on a relevant topic. Rapid reviews offer accelerated knowledge synthesis through a streamlined timely and cost-effective approach that is directed and guided by stakeholders. Both scoping and rapid reviews are used to synthesize the literature, and also to describe and assess conceptual, theoretical, and methodological trends, identify gaps in research and practice, and inform future sport and exercise psychology research and practice directions. We offer evidence-based and field-specific guidelines to conduct scoping reviews and rapid reviews. These types of syntheses in sport and exercise psychology are important for advancing research and practice and highlight the value of collaborations with key stakeholders. Our guidelines will help with the uniformity and dependability of scoping and rapid reviews while also advancing the impact and value of this type of research.

范围审查和快速审查是系统地综合研究的有意方法。在运动和运动心理学中，范围界定评论可以总结信息来描述相关主题的已知内容。快速审查通过由利益攸关方指导和指导的精简、及时和具有成本效益的方法，加速了知识的综合。范围界定和快速回顾都用于综合文献，也用于描述和评估概念、理论和方法趋势，确定研究和实践中的差距，并为未来的体育和运动心理学研究和实践方向提供信息。我们提供基于证据和特定领域的指导方针来进行范围审查和快速审查。这些类型的运动和运动心理学的综合对于推进研究和实践非常重要，并突出了与关键利益相关者合作的价值。我们的指南将有助于范围界定和快速审查的一致性和可靠性，同时也提高了这类研究的影响和价值。

引用次数: 12

Introduction to IRSEP special issue: research review methodologies in sport and exercise psychology IRSEP特刊简介:运动与运动心理学的研究回顾方法

IF 5.5 2区心理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI: 10.1080/1750984X.2021.2014101

P. Coffee, D. Tod

On behalf of the Associate Editors and the Editorial Board, we are excited to introduce an IRSEP Special Issue on Research Review Methodologies in Sport and Exercise Psychology. We dedicate this special issue to Prof. Aidan Moran. Aidan’s research, writings, and books are hugely influential, and he was a tremendous influence in bringing modern cognitive psychology concepts to sport psychology models and theories, especially in the areas of imagery and attention. The conceptual contribution of his work, his insistence on critical consideration of all theoretical perspectives, his methodological rigour, and the clarity of his writing will ensure that his work remains relevant for many years to come. It is no coincidence that these scientific principles are foundational to the Aims and Scope of the journal he founded in 2006, IRSEP. The purpose of this special issue was to build upon the success of IRSEP by providing a substantial resource on research review methodologies to further develop the quality, variety, and rigour of review manuscripts in sport and exercise psychology. The special issue comprises 12 articles across research review methodologies/topics. Each article in the special issue is comprised of two main parts, addressing methods/topic and practice:

我们很高兴代表副主编和编委会介绍一期关于运动和锻炼心理学研究综述方法的IRSEP特刊。我们将这期特刊献给艾丹·莫兰教授。艾丹的研究、著作和书籍都具有巨大的影响力，他在将现代认知心理学概念引入体育心理学模型和理论方面，特别是在意象和注意力领域，产生了巨大的影响。他的作品在概念上的贡献，他对所有理论观点的批判性思考的坚持，他方法论的严谨性，以及他的写作的清晰性，将确保他的作品在未来的许多年里仍然具有相关性。这些科学原理是他于2006年创办的《IRSEP》杂志目标和范围的基础，这绝非巧合。本期特刊的目的是在IRSEP成功的基础上，提供大量的研究综述方法资源，以进一步提高运动和锻炼心理学综述手稿的质量、多样性和严谨性。特刊包括12篇涉及研究综述方法/主题的文章。特刊中的每一篇文章都由两个主要部分组成，涉及方法/主题和实践：

{"title":"Introduction to IRSEP special issue: research review methodologies in sport and exercise psychology","authors":"P. Coffee, D. Tod","doi":"10.1080/1750984X.2021.2014101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.2014101","url":null,"abstract":"On behalf of the Associate Editors and the Editorial Board, we are excited to introduce an IRSEP Special Issue on Research Review Methodologies in Sport and Exercise Psychology. We dedicate this special issue to Prof. Aidan Moran. Aidan’s research, writings, and books are hugely influential, and he was a tremendous influence in bringing modern cognitive psychology concepts to sport psychology models and theories, especially in the areas of imagery and attention. The conceptual contribution of his work, his insistence on critical consideration of all theoretical perspectives, his methodological rigour, and the clarity of his writing will ensure that his work remains relevant for many years to come. It is no coincidence that these scientific principles are foundational to the Aims and Scope of the journal he founded in 2006, IRSEP. The purpose of this special issue was to build upon the success of IRSEP by providing a substantial resource on research review methodologies to further develop the quality, variety, and rigour of review manuscripts in sport and exercise psychology. The special issue comprises 12 articles across research review methodologies/topics. Each article in the special issue is comprised of two main parts, addressing methods/topic and practice:","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"15 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49129405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Citation network analysis 引文网络分析

IF 5.5 2区心理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI: 10.1080/1750984X.2021.1989705

Colin D. McLaren, M. Bruner

ABSTRACT Knowledge is socially constructed, and one way that researchers convey knowledge is through citation practices within research texts to illustrate the foundation upon which current research is designed and results interpreted. Citation network analysis (CNA) is a review method that seeks to map the scientific structure of a field of research as a function of citation practices. Generally speaking, research texts that receive more citations from others symbolizes a degree of prominence to a field of study; however, the more common approaches to synthesizing research in the form of a review (e.g. meta-analyses, systematic reviews) are not able to capture these underlying metrics. Given that CNA is relatively new to the field of sport and exercise psychology, we first provide an overview of the method, including a brief review of network theory, existing research in the field of sport and exercise psychology, and some of the important limitations to consider. Then, we offer a series of guidelines to direct CNA reviews from the conception of a research question to the visualization of a citation network. Finally, we conclude the review with an overview of recent methodological advancements with potential to expand research questions and benefit future citation network research.

知识是社会建构的，研究人员传达知识的一种方式是通过研究文本中的引用实践来说明当前研究设计和结果解释的基础。引文网络分析(Citation network analysis, CNA)是一种综述方法，旨在将某一研究领域的科学结构映射为引文实践的函数。一般来说，研究文本被他人引用的次数越多，表明该研究领域的突出程度越高;然而，以综述的形式综合研究的更常见的方法(例如荟萃分析，系统综述)无法捕获这些潜在的指标。鉴于CNA在运动和运动心理学领域相对较新，我们首先对该方法进行概述，包括对网络理论、运动和运动心理学领域现有研究的简要回顾，以及一些需要考虑的重要局限性。然后，我们提供了一系列指导CNA综述从研究问题的概念到引文网络的可视化的指导方针。最后，我们总结了最近的方法进展，这些进展可能会扩大研究问题，并有利于未来的引文网络研究。

{"title":"Citation network analysis","authors":"Colin D. McLaren, M. Bruner","doi":"10.1080/1750984X.2021.1989705","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1989705","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Knowledge is socially constructed, and one way that researchers convey knowledge is through citation practices within research texts to illustrate the foundation upon which current research is designed and results interpreted. Citation network analysis (CNA) is a review method that seeks to map the scientific structure of a field of research as a function of citation practices. Generally speaking, research texts that receive more citations from others symbolizes a degree of prominence to a field of study; however, the more common approaches to synthesizing research in the form of a review (e.g. meta-analyses, systematic reviews) are not able to capture these underlying metrics. Given that CNA is relatively new to the field of sport and exercise psychology, we first provide an overview of the method, including a brief review of network theory, existing research in the field of sport and exercise psychology, and some of the important limitations to consider. Then, we offer a series of guidelines to direct CNA reviews from the conception of a research question to the visualization of a citation network. Finally, we conclude the review with an overview of recent methodological advancements with potential to expand research questions and benefit future citation network research.","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"15 1","pages":"179 - 198"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48577143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

Complex interventions 复杂的干预措施

IF 5.5 2区心理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI: 10.1080/1750984X.2021.2001838

Geoff Bates

ABSTRACT Methods of analysis in systematic reviews of interventions continue to develop as authors seek to answer questions about not only whether interventions work, but how and why they work. As our knowledge improves about how complexity in intervention design, implementation and context explains the variation in the association between interventions and outcomes, systematic reviewers increasingly seek to understand this complexity. This article explores how authors of systematic reviews can through their analysis provide the evidence that supports our understanding of how sport and exercise psychology interventions are intended to work and how complexity in the interventions themselves and in the environment they are introduced into may explain the variation in their impacts. It identifies key methods and tools to support reviewers to understand and analyse complexity in interventions, illustrated with examples from sport and exercise psychology. While complexity can be challenging to incorporate into an analysis of interventions in a systematic review, it is an important step for reviewers to take to make sense of large and complex bodies of evidence and to inform the efficient development and adaptation of interventions.

干预措施系统综述中的分析方法不断发展，因为作者不仅试图回答干预措施是否有效的问题，而且还试图回答干预措施如何有效以及为什么有效的问题。随着我们对干预措施设计、实施和背景的复杂性如何解释干预措施与结果之间关联的变化的认识的提高，系统审稿人越来越多地寻求理解这种复杂性。本文探讨了系统综述的作者如何通过他们的分析提供证据，支持我们理解运动和运动心理学干预是如何起作用的，以及干预本身和干预所处环境的复杂性如何解释其影响的变化。它确定了关键的方法和工具，以支持审稿人理解和分析干预措施的复杂性，并举例说明了体育和运动心理学。虽然在系统评价中将复杂性纳入对干预措施的分析可能具有挑战性，但对于审稿人来说，理解大量复杂的证据并为有效制定和适应干预措施提供信息是重要的一步。

{"title":"Complex interventions","authors":"Geoff Bates","doi":"10.1080/1750984X.2021.2001838","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.2001838","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Methods of analysis in systematic reviews of interventions continue to develop as authors seek to answer questions about not only whether interventions work, but how and why they work. As our knowledge improves about how complexity in intervention design, implementation and context explains the variation in the association between interventions and outcomes, systematic reviewers increasingly seek to understand this complexity. This article explores how authors of systematic reviews can through their analysis provide the evidence that supports our understanding of how sport and exercise psychology interventions are intended to work and how complexity in the interventions themselves and in the environment they are introduced into may explain the variation in their impacts. It identifies key methods and tools to support reviewers to understand and analyse complexity in interventions, illustrated with examples from sport and exercise psychology. While complexity can be challenging to incorporate into an analysis of interventions in a systematic review, it is an important step for reviewers to take to make sense of large and complex bodies of evidence and to inform the efficient development and adaptation of interventions.","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"15 1","pages":"30 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47043980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 506

Realist review 现实主义评论

IF 5.5 2区心理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2021.1969674

Rebecca Hunter, Trish Gorely, Michelle Beattie, Kevin Harris

ABSTRACT

In the field of sport and exercise psychology, the systematic review is still considered by many, to be the gold standard literature review. However, reviews like these, which judge whether an intervention works or not, can leave many unanswered questions. When it comes to complex social interventions, failing to suggest reasons for an intervention’s efficacy, often means practitioners struggle to successfully implement research findings in the real world. This lack of detail has led many to question the utility of systematic reviews when examining behaviour change interventions in complex social environments. Realist reviews are increasing in popularity because they go beyond asking if an intervention works, to look for theories as to why a programme worked, who it worked for and in what context it worked. However, despite the growing popularity of realist reviews, there is still limited application of this approach across the sport and exercise sciences. This paper aims to increase awareness regarding the utility of realist research by offering an introduction to realist review and an explanation of the steps involved.

在体育与运动心理学领域，系统综述仍然被许多人认为是文献综述的金标准。然而，像这样的评估，判断干预是否有效，可能会留下许多悬而未决的问题。当涉及到复杂的社会干预时，如果不能说明干预效果的原因，往往意味着从业者很难在现实世界中成功地实施研究结果。这种细节的缺乏导致许多人质疑在复杂社会环境中检查行为改变干预措施时系统评价的效用。现实主义评论越来越受欢迎，因为它们超越了询问干预措施是否有效的范畴，而是寻找有关一个项目为什么有效、对谁有效以及在什么背景下有效的理论。然而，尽管现实主义评论越来越受欢迎，但这种方法在体育和运动科学中的应用仍然有限。本文旨在通过介绍现实主义评论和解释所涉及的步骤，提高人们对现实主义研究效用的认识。

{"title":"Realist review","authors":"Rebecca Hunter, Trish Gorely, Michelle Beattie, Kevin Harris","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2021.1969674","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2021.1969674","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn the field of sport and exercise psychology, the systematic review is still considered by many, to be the gold standard literature review. However, reviews like these, which judge whether an intervention works or not, can leave many unanswered questions. When it comes to complex social interventions, failing to suggest reasons for an intervention’s efficacy, often means practitioners struggle to successfully implement research findings in the real world. This lack of detail has led many to question the utility of systematic reviews when examining behaviour change interventions in complex social environments. Realist reviews are increasing in popularity because they go beyond asking if an intervention works, to look for theories as to why a programme worked, who it worked for and in what context it worked. However, despite the growing popularity of realist reviews, there is still limited application of this approach across the sport and exercise sciences. This paper aims to increase awareness regarding the utility of realist research by offering an introduction to realist review and an explanation of the steps involved.","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138517812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 74

From simulation to motor execution: a review of the impact of dynamic motor imagery on performance 从模拟到运动执行:动态运动意象对运动表现影响的综述

IF 5.5 2区心理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Pub Date : 2021-12-10 DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2021.2007539

A. Guillot, F. Rienzo, Cornelia Frank, U. Debarnot, Tadhg MacIntyre

引用次数: 8

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀