首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Cognition and Development最新文献

英文 中文
Number Input in Mothers and Fathers of 9-Month-Olds 9 个月幼儿的母亲和父亲的数量输入
IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-01-14 DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2024.2303760
Kelly S. Mix, Angelica Alonso, Jung-Jung Lee, Milagros Urioste-Resta, Natasha Cabrera, Stephanie Reich
The present study examined patterns of number-related utterances and actions directed to 9-month-old infants by their parents. An ethnically and economically diverse sample of 86 families participa...
本研究考察了父母对 9 个月大的婴儿所做的与数字有关的言语和动作的模式。86个不同种族和经济背景的家庭参与了这项研究。
{"title":"Number Input in Mothers and Fathers of 9-Month-Olds","authors":"Kelly S. Mix, Angelica Alonso, Jung-Jung Lee, Milagros Urioste-Resta, Natasha Cabrera, Stephanie Reich","doi":"10.1080/15248372.2024.2303760","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2024.2303760","url":null,"abstract":"The present study examined patterns of number-related utterances and actions directed to 9-month-old infants by their parents. An ethnically and economically diverse sample of 86 families participa...","PeriodicalId":47680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139461979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Generic Language and Reporting Practices in Developmental Journals: Implications for Facilitating a More Representative Cognitive Developmental Science 发展期刊中的通用语言和报告实践:促进更具代表性的认知发展科学的意义
IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2023.2290504
J. DeJesus, Maureen A. Callanan, Valerie A. Umscheid, S. Gelman
{"title":"Generic Language and Reporting Practices in Developmental Journals: Implications for Facilitating a More Representative Cognitive Developmental Science","authors":"J. DeJesus, Maureen A. Callanan, Valerie A. Umscheid, S. Gelman","doi":"10.1080/15248372.2023.2290504","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2290504","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138961713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Age-Related Changes in Search Strategies in a Cancellation Task from Childhood to Adolescence 儿童期到青春期取消任务中搜索策略的年龄相关变化
IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2023.2284743
Alma Guilbert
Children are limited in visual search accuracy and this ability increases from childhood to adolescence. Developmental limitations in visual search could be related to children’s difficulties in ef...
儿童在视觉搜索的准确性上是有限的,这种能力从童年到青春期逐渐增强。视觉搜索方面的发育限制可能与儿童在阅读方面的困难有关。
{"title":"Age-Related Changes in Search Strategies in a Cancellation Task from Childhood to Adolescence","authors":"Alma Guilbert","doi":"10.1080/15248372.2023.2284743","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2284743","url":null,"abstract":"Children are limited in visual search accuracy and this ability increases from childhood to adolescence. Developmental limitations in visual search could be related to children’s difficulties in ef...","PeriodicalId":47680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138493971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Broadening Convenience Samples to Advance Theoretical Progress and Avoid Bias in Developmental Science 扩大便利样本促进理论进步避免发展科学偏差
2区 心理学 Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-11-12 DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2023.2270055
Sabine Doebel, Michael C. Frank
AbstractDiverse samples are valuable to the study of development, and to psychology more broadly. But convenience samples—typically recruited from local populations close to universities—are still the most widely used in developmental science, despite the fact that their use leads to a vast over-representation of Western, White, and high socio-economic status participants in our studies. Do convenience samples still have a place in our research? While diverse samples are crucial to advancing developmental science, policies designed to encourage recruitment of such samples may not always succeed in improving sample diversity in ways that will benefit our theories and reduce bias. Further, convenience samples are just, well, convenient – and because their costs are lower, they allow for faster and more precise research. We suggest three paths forward to resolve this tension: 1) use theory and observed variation to choose aspects of diversity to prioritize in a particular study; 2) use online methods as an important route to broaden which samples are convenient; and 3) work in teams to achieve “inconvenient” samples using many different convenience populations. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
摘要多样化的样本对发展研究乃至更广泛的心理学研究都是有价值的。但是便利样本——通常是从靠近大学的当地人群中招募的——仍然是发展科学中最广泛使用的样本,尽管在我们的研究中,它们的使用导致了西方、白人和高社会经济地位参与者的大量过度代表。方便样本在我们的研究中还有一席之地吗?虽然多样化的样本对于推进发展科学至关重要,但旨在鼓励招募此类样本的政策可能并不总是能够成功地以有利于我们的理论和减少偏见的方式改善样本多样性。此外,方便样本只是,嗯,方便——而且因为它们的成本更低,它们允许更快、更精确的研究。我们提出了三条解决这一矛盾的途径:1)利用理论和观察到的变化来选择在特定研究中优先考虑的多样性方面;2)将在线方法作为拓宽方便样本的重要途径;3)在团队中工作,使用许多不同的方便人群来获得“不方便”的样本。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
{"title":"Broadening Convenience Samples to Advance Theoretical Progress and Avoid Bias in Developmental Science","authors":"Sabine Doebel, Michael C. Frank","doi":"10.1080/15248372.2023.2270055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2270055","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractDiverse samples are valuable to the study of development, and to psychology more broadly. But convenience samples—typically recruited from local populations close to universities—are still the most widely used in developmental science, despite the fact that their use leads to a vast over-representation of Western, White, and high socio-economic status participants in our studies. Do convenience samples still have a place in our research? While diverse samples are crucial to advancing developmental science, policies designed to encourage recruitment of such samples may not always succeed in improving sample diversity in ways that will benefit our theories and reduce bias. Further, convenience samples are just, well, convenient – and because their costs are lower, they allow for faster and more precise research. We suggest three paths forward to resolve this tension: 1) use theory and observed variation to choose aspects of diversity to prioritize in a particular study; 2) use online methods as an important route to broaden which samples are convenient; and 3) work in teams to achieve “inconvenient” samples using many different convenience populations. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":47680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135038326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Parent-Report Diary Study of Young Children’s Prospective Memory Successes and Failures 幼儿前瞻记忆成功与失败的家长报告日记研究
2区 心理学 Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2023.2277930
Caitlin E. V. Mahy, Ege Kamber, Maria C. Conversano, Ulrich Mueller, Sascha Zuber
ABSTRACTAlthough laboratory studies have examined the development of children’s prospective memory (PM) and the factors that influence its performance, much less is known about children’s PM performance and development in their everyday life. The current study used an online parent diary report approach to examine American 2- to 6-year-olds’ PM successes and failures. In an initial session, 206 parents completed a series of questionnaires on their child’s memory and cognition. For the next four days, parents reported instances of PM successes and failures and answered questions about a number of task factors (task motivation, importance to the parent and child, who assigned the PM task, task typicality, and parental assistance). We found that: (1) parents reported children as young as 2 years old had PM successes in daily life and there were no age differences in the number of reported PM successes and failures, (2) parents reported more PM successes than failures, and (3) several factors influenced the likelihood of children’s success in everyday PM tasks, including child motivation and task importance to parents, whereas task typicality and parental assistance were related to PM failure. Finally, we explored the domains of PM successes and failures as well as the type of assistance that parents provided. These results are discussed in relation to past findings of children’s PM in laboratory and naturalistic settings. Parent diary-report methodology is a feasible and efficient alternative to naturalistic laboratory tasks to examine young children’s PM in everyday life. AcknowledgmentsCEVM wishes to acknowledge support from a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant and from an Early Ontario Researcher Award from the Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation, and Science. SZ acknowledges funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF; grant number: P400PS_199283).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2277930Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/p96w5/?view_only=9d0356b5f7ab4c45bdee7e8608e30132.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2015-03774]; Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science [ERA-17-13-118]; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung [P400PS_199283].
虽然实验室研究已经探讨了儿童前瞻记忆(PM)的发展及其影响因素,但对儿童前瞻记忆的表现及其在日常生活中的发展知之甚少。目前的研究使用在线父母日记报告的方法来检查美国2至6岁儿童的PM成功和失败。在最初的阶段,206名家长完成了一系列关于孩子记忆和认知的问卷调查。在接下来的四天里,父母报告了PM成功和失败的实例,并回答了关于许多任务因素的问题(任务动机,对父母和孩子的重要性,谁分配了PM任务,任务的典型性,以及父母的帮助)。我们发现:(1)父母报告的孩子在2岁时就在日常生活中获得了PM成功,并且报告的PM成功和失败的数量没有年龄差异;(2)父母报告的PM成功多于失败;(3)几个因素影响儿童在日常PM任务中成功的可能性,包括儿童动机和任务对父母的重要性,而任务典型性和父母协助与PM失败有关。最后,我们探讨了项目管理成功和失败的领域,以及父母提供的帮助类型。这些结果与过去在实验室和自然环境中儿童PM的发现有关。家长日记报告方法是一种可行和有效的替代自然实验室任务,以检查幼儿的PM在日常生活中。scevm希望感谢加拿大自然科学与工程研究委员会的发现基金和安大略省研究、创新和科学部的早期安大略省研究人员奖的支持。SZ承认瑞士国家科学基金会(SNSF)的资助;授权号:P400PS_199283)。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。补充材料本文的补充数据可在线访问https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2277930Data可用性声明支持本研究结果的数据可在开放科学框架:https://osf.io/p96w5/?view_only=9d0356b5f7ab4c45bdee7e8608e30132.Additional信息资助本工作得到加拿大自然科学与工程研究委员会[RGPIN-2015-03774]的支持;安大略省研究、创新和科学部[ERA-17-13-118];Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung [P400PS_199283]。
{"title":"A Parent-Report Diary Study of Young Children’s Prospective Memory Successes and Failures","authors":"Caitlin E. V. Mahy, Ege Kamber, Maria C. Conversano, Ulrich Mueller, Sascha Zuber","doi":"10.1080/15248372.2023.2277930","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2277930","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTAlthough laboratory studies have examined the development of children’s prospective memory (PM) and the factors that influence its performance, much less is known about children’s PM performance and development in their everyday life. The current study used an online parent diary report approach to examine American 2- to 6-year-olds’ PM successes and failures. In an initial session, 206 parents completed a series of questionnaires on their child’s memory and cognition. For the next four days, parents reported instances of PM successes and failures and answered questions about a number of task factors (task motivation, importance to the parent and child, who assigned the PM task, task typicality, and parental assistance). We found that: (1) parents reported children as young as 2 years old had PM successes in daily life and there were no age differences in the number of reported PM successes and failures, (2) parents reported more PM successes than failures, and (3) several factors influenced the likelihood of children’s success in everyday PM tasks, including child motivation and task importance to parents, whereas task typicality and parental assistance were related to PM failure. Finally, we explored the domains of PM successes and failures as well as the type of assistance that parents provided. These results are discussed in relation to past findings of children’s PM in laboratory and naturalistic settings. Parent diary-report methodology is a feasible and efficient alternative to naturalistic laboratory tasks to examine young children’s PM in everyday life. AcknowledgmentsCEVM wishes to acknowledge support from a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant and from an Early Ontario Researcher Award from the Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation, and Science. SZ acknowledges funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF; grant number: P400PS_199283).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2277930Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/p96w5/?view_only=9d0356b5f7ab4c45bdee7e8608e30132.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2015-03774]; Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science [ERA-17-13-118]; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung [P400PS_199283].","PeriodicalId":47680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135679440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Young Children’s Science Learning from Narrative Books: The Role of Text Cohesion and Caregivers’ Extratextual Talk 幼儿从叙事书中学习科学:语篇衔接与照顾者语外话语的作用
2区 心理学 Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2023.2267229
Hilary E. Miller-Goldwater, Melanie H. Hanft, Alissa G. Miller, Patricia J. Bauer
ABSTRACTOne way to support young children’s factual learning is through shared book reading (reading books with a knowledgeable other). Many books that teach factual content are narrative in structure, in which factual content is embedded within a fictional storyline. However, there are gaps in our understanding of factors influencing children’s factual learning from narrative books. In this experiment, 38 caregivers and their 4- to 5-year-old children from the Southeastern United States participated. Each caregiver read to their child two narrative books on science concepts. The books varied in their levels of cohesion (e.g. drawing connections between textual elements and providing details and comparisons). We coded caregivers’ extratextual talk while reading for the extent to which it emphasized science information (informational highlighted talk) or went beyond the text to provide further related information (informational elaborative talk). Children’s recall of the books’ science and story content was tested in free and probed recall formats. We found that children had higher recall of the story content, even though caregivers emphasized the science content through their highlighted extratextual talk. Caregivers used more elaborative extratextual talk with the low cohesion book, perhaps as compensation for the book’s lack of cohesion. However, children’s recall of the science content was most strongly predicted by the books’ cohesion and caregivers’ highlighted extratextual talk. These results emphasize the important role that books’ textual features and caregivers’ extratextual talk during book reading have on young children’s factual learning from narrative books. AcknowledgmentsWe give special appreciation to Britney Del Solar, Laura O’Hanlon, Jelena Pejic, and Rachel Shanahan, for help with transcriptions and coding as well as to other members of the Memory at Emory laboratory for their contributions to various stages of this research. We also thank the children and caregivers who participated in this research. Aspects of this work were presented at the 74th Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by the National Science Foundation award # 1911639 and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development award # F32 HD100176-02 to Hilary E. Miller-Goldwater.
摘要支持幼儿事实学习的一种方法是通过共享读书(与知识渊博的人一起读书)。许多教授事实内容的书都是叙事结构,其中事实内容嵌入虚构的故事情节中。然而,我们对影响儿童从叙事类书籍中进行事实学习的因素的认识还存在差距。在这项实验中,来自美国东南部的38名看护者和他们4到5岁的孩子参加了这项实验。每个看护人给孩子读两本关于科学概念的叙述书。这些书的衔接水平各不相同(例如,在文本元素之间建立联系,提供细节和比较)。我们在阅读时对看护者的语外谈话进行编码,以确定其强调科学信息(信息性高亮谈话)或超越文本提供进一步相关信息(信息性详细谈话)的程度。儿童对书籍的科学和故事内容的回忆以自由和探究的形式进行了测试。我们发现孩子们对故事内容有更高的回忆,即使照顾者通过他们突出的课外谈话来强调科学内容。看护者对低衔接的书进行了更详细的文本外对话,这可能是对书缺乏衔接的补偿。然而,儿童对科学内容的回忆最强烈地预测了书籍的凝聚力和照顾者强调的课外谈话。这些结果强调了书籍的文本特征和阅读过程中照顾者的语外对话对幼儿从叙事书籍中学习事实的重要作用。我们特别感谢Britney Del Solar、Laura O 'Hanlon、Jelena Pejic和Rachel Shanahan,感谢他们在转录和编码方面的帮助,也感谢Emory记忆实验室的其他成员在本研究的各个阶段所做的贡献。我们也感谢参与这项研究的儿童和照顾者。这项工作的各个方面在第74届儿童发展研究学会双年会上进行了介绍。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究得到了国家科学基金会奖# 1911639和尤尼斯·肯尼迪·施莱弗国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所奖# F32 HD100176-02给希拉里·e·米勒-戈德华特的支持。
{"title":"Young Children’s Science Learning from Narrative Books: The Role of Text Cohesion and Caregivers’ Extratextual Talk","authors":"Hilary E. Miller-Goldwater, Melanie H. Hanft, Alissa G. Miller, Patricia J. Bauer","doi":"10.1080/15248372.2023.2267229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2267229","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTOne way to support young children’s factual learning is through shared book reading (reading books with a knowledgeable other). Many books that teach factual content are narrative in structure, in which factual content is embedded within a fictional storyline. However, there are gaps in our understanding of factors influencing children’s factual learning from narrative books. In this experiment, 38 caregivers and their 4- to 5-year-old children from the Southeastern United States participated. Each caregiver read to their child two narrative books on science concepts. The books varied in their levels of cohesion (e.g. drawing connections between textual elements and providing details and comparisons). We coded caregivers’ extratextual talk while reading for the extent to which it emphasized science information (informational highlighted talk) or went beyond the text to provide further related information (informational elaborative talk). Children’s recall of the books’ science and story content was tested in free and probed recall formats. We found that children had higher recall of the story content, even though caregivers emphasized the science content through their highlighted extratextual talk. Caregivers used more elaborative extratextual talk with the low cohesion book, perhaps as compensation for the book’s lack of cohesion. However, children’s recall of the science content was most strongly predicted by the books’ cohesion and caregivers’ highlighted extratextual talk. These results emphasize the important role that books’ textual features and caregivers’ extratextual talk during book reading have on young children’s factual learning from narrative books. AcknowledgmentsWe give special appreciation to Britney Del Solar, Laura O’Hanlon, Jelena Pejic, and Rachel Shanahan, for help with transcriptions and coding as well as to other members of the Memory at Emory laboratory for their contributions to various stages of this research. We also thank the children and caregivers who participated in this research. Aspects of this work were presented at the 74th Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by the National Science Foundation award # 1911639 and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development award # F32 HD100176-02 to Hilary E. Miller-Goldwater.","PeriodicalId":47680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135778455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of a Naïve Theory of Superstition Naïve迷信理论的发展
2区 心理学 Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2023.2256871
Jacqueline D. Woolley, Paola A. Baca, Kelsey A. Kelley
ABSTRACTSuperstitious behaviors persist across time, culture, and age. Although often considered irrational and even potentially harmful, superstitions have recently been shown to have positive effects on stress levels, confidence, and ultimately, performance. However, it remains unclear how people conceive of superstitious behaviors, specifically, whether people attribute apparent superstitious efficacy to magical forces or to something else, such as reduced stress or increased confidence. In two studies we asked 6- to 9-year-old children and adults from the United States to rate how causally connected superstitious behaviors were to desired outcomes. In Study 1, participants provided open-ended responses to questions probing why they believed the actions were tied to the outcomes. Participants were more likely across ages to offer natural than magical explanations to explain the connection – this became more pronounced with age. In Study 2, half the stories did not permit a plausible natural explanation, thus any perceived causal relation could only be attributable to magic. Participants were asked how connected the superstitious behaviors were to the outcomes. We found significant differences in ratings of connectedness between stories that held plausible natural explanations and those that did not in our adult sample only. Our findings suggest that people recruit their naive psychology when reasoning about the efficacy of superstitious behaviors; however, children may also believe magic to be causally relevant.KEYWORDS: superstitionexplanationsnaive psychology magiccausality AcknowledgmentsData collection took place at the University of Texas at Austin. We thank the children who participated, their parents, the staff at the Children’s Research Center, and the following undergraduate students who helped with data collection, coding, entry, and reliability: Ruth Esther Apura, Silviya Bastola, Cameron Bates, Katherine Bos, Zachary Bricken, Emma Brunk, Ashlea Cooper, Amanda Cramer, Matthew Finch, Julia Fishkind, Avery Largent, Cloris Lu, Candice Ma, Ashley Missimo, Jacquelyn Olivarez, Ilerioluwa Olugboye, Claire Perkins, Fernanda Ramos, Muskan Shah, Madeline Young, and Jasmine Xu. Thanks are also due to Jenny Nisssel and members of the Imagination and Cognition lab for feedback on earlier drafts of the manuscript.Disclosure statementWe have reported all measures, conditions, and data exclusions, as well as how we have determined our sample sizes.Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study and the code used for analyses are openly available on OSF at https://osf.io/8q3xn/.
摘要迷信行为跨越时间、文化和年龄而持续存在。虽然迷信通常被认为是非理性的,甚至有潜在的危害,但最近的研究表明,迷信对压力水平、自信,最终对表现有积极的影响。然而,目前还不清楚人们是如何理解迷信行为的,具体来说,人们是将迷信的明显功效归因于神奇的力量,还是其他原因,比如减轻压力或增加信心。在两项研究中,我们要求来自美国的6到9岁的儿童和成人评估迷信行为与预期结果的因果关系。在研究1中,参与者对探究为什么他们认为行为与结果相关的问题提供了开放式的回答。不同年龄段的参与者更有可能给出自然的解释,而不是神奇的解释来解释这种联系——随着年龄的增长,这一点变得更加明显。在研究2中,一半的故事不允许一个合理的自然解释,因此任何可感知的因果关系只能归因于魔法。参与者被问及迷信行为与结果之间的联系。我们发现,仅在我们的成人样本中,包含合理自然解释的故事和不包含合理自然解释的故事在连通性评分上存在显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,人们在推理迷信行为的功效时招募了他们的天真心理;然而,孩子们也可能相信魔法是有因果关系的。关键词:迷信、解释、理性心理学、魔法、因果关系确认数据收集在德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校进行。我们感谢参与的孩子们,他们的父母,儿童研究中心的工作人员,以及以下帮助数据收集、编码、录入和可靠性的本科生:Ruth Esther Apura, Silviya Bastola, Cameron Bates, Katherine Bos, Zachary Bricken, Emma Brunk, Ashlea Cooper, Amanda Cramer, Matthew Finch, Julia Fishkind, Avery Largent, Cloris Lu, Candice Ma, Ashley Missimo, Jacquelyn Olivarez, Ilerioluwa Olugboye, Claire Perkins, Fernanda Ramos, Muskan Shah, Madeline Young和Jasmine Xu。还要感谢Jenny Nisssel和想象与认知实验室的成员对手稿早期草稿的反馈。披露声明我们已经报告了所有的测量、条件和数据排除,以及我们如何确定我们的样本量。数据可用性声明支持本研究结果的数据和用于分析的代码在OSF上是公开的,网址是https://osf.io/8q3xn/。
{"title":"Development of a Naïve Theory of Superstition","authors":"Jacqueline D. Woolley, Paola A. Baca, Kelsey A. Kelley","doi":"10.1080/15248372.2023.2256871","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2256871","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSuperstitious behaviors persist across time, culture, and age. Although often considered irrational and even potentially harmful, superstitions have recently been shown to have positive effects on stress levels, confidence, and ultimately, performance. However, it remains unclear how people conceive of superstitious behaviors, specifically, whether people attribute apparent superstitious efficacy to magical forces or to something else, such as reduced stress or increased confidence. In two studies we asked 6- to 9-year-old children and adults from the United States to rate how causally connected superstitious behaviors were to desired outcomes. In Study 1, participants provided open-ended responses to questions probing why they believed the actions were tied to the outcomes. Participants were more likely across ages to offer natural than magical explanations to explain the connection – this became more pronounced with age. In Study 2, half the stories did not permit a plausible natural explanation, thus any perceived causal relation could only be attributable to magic. Participants were asked how connected the superstitious behaviors were to the outcomes. We found significant differences in ratings of connectedness between stories that held plausible natural explanations and those that did not in our adult sample only. Our findings suggest that people recruit their naive psychology when reasoning about the efficacy of superstitious behaviors; however, children may also believe magic to be causally relevant.KEYWORDS: superstitionexplanationsnaive psychology magiccausality AcknowledgmentsData collection took place at the University of Texas at Austin. We thank the children who participated, their parents, the staff at the Children’s Research Center, and the following undergraduate students who helped with data collection, coding, entry, and reliability: Ruth Esther Apura, Silviya Bastola, Cameron Bates, Katherine Bos, Zachary Bricken, Emma Brunk, Ashlea Cooper, Amanda Cramer, Matthew Finch, Julia Fishkind, Avery Largent, Cloris Lu, Candice Ma, Ashley Missimo, Jacquelyn Olivarez, Ilerioluwa Olugboye, Claire Perkins, Fernanda Ramos, Muskan Shah, Madeline Young, and Jasmine Xu. Thanks are also due to Jenny Nisssel and members of the Imagination and Cognition lab for feedback on earlier drafts of the manuscript.Disclosure statementWe have reported all measures, conditions, and data exclusions, as well as how we have determined our sample sizes.Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study and the code used for analyses are openly available on OSF at https://osf.io/8q3xn/.","PeriodicalId":47680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136294672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What’s the Evidence Say? The Relation Between Evidential-Trust and Theory of Mind 证据是什么?证据信任与心理理论的关系
2区 心理学 Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-09-24 DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2023.2260874
Bartuğ Çelik, Nice Ergut, Jedediah W.P. Allen
ABSTRACTPrevious research has shown that linguistic cues such as mental and modal verbs can influence young children’s judgments about the reliability of informants. Further, certain languages include grammatical morphemes (i.e. evidential markers), which clarify the source of information coming from testimony (e.g., Bulgarian, Japanese, Turkish). Accordingly, the first aim of the current study is to examine whether Turkish-speaking children’s reliability judgments change based on evidential markers (i.e. the past-tense direct evidential marker, –DI, and the past-tense indirect evidential marker, –mIş). The literature has also investigated whether selective trust abilities are related to understanding the epistemic states of others (i.e., Theory of Mind). Therefore, the second aim is to examine the relation between selective trust based on evidential markers and ToM abilities by including a comprehensive ToM battery. Eighty-six Turkish-speaking preschool and elementary school children between the ages of 4 and 7, residing in a metropolitan city in Turkey, participated in a selective trust task based on evidential markers, a general language task, and a ToM battery. The results of the current study showed that after the age of 6, Turkish-speaking children start to selectively trust the informant using the past-tense direct evidential marker, –DI, over the past-tense indirect evidential marker, –mIş. Selective trust performance was related to receptive vocabulary but not to ToM abilities after controlling for participant gender and age. Overall, the results contribute to current discussions about children’s selective trust ability based on linguistic cues and its relation with ToM.KEYWORDS: selective trusttheory of mindevidential markersreliabilityTurkish AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank all of children and their parents who participated in this study as well as the preschools for helping with data collection. We would like to also thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and feedback. Lastly, many thanks to research assistants for their help conducting the study.AuthorshipNote that the first authorship is shared by B. Çelik. and N. Ergut. Data collection and data analyses were performed by B. Çelik and N. Ergut under the supervision of J.W.P Allen. All authors wrote the manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Data availability statementData can be made available on request.Notes1 There is also another evidential marker (–DIR) used for the present tense and allows speakers to make a logical deduction about facts and regularities (for more on the types of evidential markers in Turkish, see Aksu-Koç, Ögel-Balaban, & Alp, Citation2009).2 Note that the appearance-reality task was excluded from all analyses. See ToM results section for details.3 Two additional conditions were piloted for a second study in which the direct evidential marker was pitted against the indirect marker with a s
摘要已有研究表明,心理动词和情态动词等语言线索会影响幼儿对举报人可靠性的判断。此外,某些语言包括语法语素(即证据标记),以澄清来自证词的信息的来源(例如,保加利亚语、日语、土耳其语)。因此,本研究的第一个目的是检验说土耳其语的儿童的可靠性判断是否会根据证据标记(即过去时直接证据标记-DI和过去时间接证据标记- mi)而改变。文献还研究了选择性信任能力是否与理解他人的认知状态(即心智理论)有关。因此,第二个目的是通过包括一个全面的汤姆能力电池来检查基于证据标记的选择性信任与汤姆能力之间的关系。86名居住在土耳其某大城市的4至7岁的土耳其语学龄前和小学儿童参加了基于证据标记的选择性信任任务、一般语言任务和汤姆电池组。本研究结果表明,6岁以后,说土耳其语的儿童开始选择性地信任使用过去时直接证据标记-DI的举报人,而不是使用过去时间接证据标记- miu。在控制了被试性别和年龄后,选择性信任表现与接受性词汇有关,而与汤姆行为能力无关。总的来说,研究结果有助于当前关于儿童基于语言线索的选择性信任能力及其与认知能力的关系的讨论。我们要感谢所有参与本研究的儿童及其家长以及幼儿园对数据收集的帮助。我们还要感谢匿名评论者提供的有用的评论和反馈。最后,非常感谢研究助理对研究的帮助。作者注意,第一作者是B. Çelik。和N. Ergut。数据收集和数据分析由B. Çelik和N. Ergut在J.W.P Allen的指导下进行。所有的作者都写了手稿。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明可应要求提供数据。注1还有另一种用于现行时的证据标记(-DIR),它允许说话者对事实和规律进行逻辑推断(有关土耳其语证据标记的更多类型,参见Aksu-Koç, Ögel-Balaban, & Alp, Citation2009)注意,外观-现实任务被排除在所有分析之外。有关详细信息,请参阅ToM结果部分在第二项研究中,另外两种情况进行了试点,其中直接证据标记与有来源的间接标记(例如,“最好的朋友”)进行了对比。这两个条件都是在当前信任任务完成后执行的80名大学生也以调查的形式参与了证据信任任务。结果显示,成年人明显更倾向于使用-DI的直接证据举报人,而不是使用- miei的间接证据举报人,t(79) = 10.548, p < 0.001(即,与预期一致,成年人认为使用-DI的直接证据举报人比使用- miei的间接证据举报人更可靠)。
{"title":"What’s the Evidence Say? The Relation Between Evidential-Trust and Theory of Mind","authors":"Bartuğ Çelik, Nice Ergut, Jedediah W.P. Allen","doi":"10.1080/15248372.2023.2260874","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2260874","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPrevious research has shown that linguistic cues such as mental and modal verbs can influence young children’s judgments about the reliability of informants. Further, certain languages include grammatical morphemes (i.e. evidential markers), which clarify the source of information coming from testimony (e.g., Bulgarian, Japanese, Turkish). Accordingly, the first aim of the current study is to examine whether Turkish-speaking children’s reliability judgments change based on evidential markers (i.e. the past-tense direct evidential marker, –DI, and the past-tense indirect evidential marker, –mIş). The literature has also investigated whether selective trust abilities are related to understanding the epistemic states of others (i.e., Theory of Mind). Therefore, the second aim is to examine the relation between selective trust based on evidential markers and ToM abilities by including a comprehensive ToM battery. Eighty-six Turkish-speaking preschool and elementary school children between the ages of 4 and 7, residing in a metropolitan city in Turkey, participated in a selective trust task based on evidential markers, a general language task, and a ToM battery. The results of the current study showed that after the age of 6, Turkish-speaking children start to selectively trust the informant using the past-tense direct evidential marker, –DI, over the past-tense indirect evidential marker, –mIş. Selective trust performance was related to receptive vocabulary but not to ToM abilities after controlling for participant gender and age. Overall, the results contribute to current discussions about children’s selective trust ability based on linguistic cues and its relation with ToM.KEYWORDS: selective trusttheory of mindevidential markersreliabilityTurkish AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank all of children and their parents who participated in this study as well as the preschools for helping with data collection. We would like to also thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and feedback. Lastly, many thanks to research assistants for their help conducting the study.AuthorshipNote that the first authorship is shared by B. Çelik. and N. Ergut. Data collection and data analyses were performed by B. Çelik and N. Ergut under the supervision of J.W.P Allen. All authors wrote the manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Data availability statementData can be made available on request.Notes1 There is also another evidential marker (–DIR) used for the present tense and allows speakers to make a logical deduction about facts and regularities (for more on the types of evidential markers in Turkish, see Aksu-Koç, Ögel-Balaban, & Alp, Citation2009).2 Note that the appearance-reality task was excluded from all analyses. See ToM results section for details.3 Two additional conditions were piloted for a second study in which the direct evidential marker was pitted against the indirect marker with a s","PeriodicalId":47680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135924330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining Neural Dynamics During Dimensional Label Comprehension and Production as a Function of Dimensional Attention 检查在尺寸标签理解和生产过程中的神经动力学作为尺寸注意的函数
2区 心理学 Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2023.2256859
Hollis R. Heim, Kara Lowery, Rachel Eddings, Bhoomika Nikam, Anastasia Kerr-German, Aaron T. Buss
ABSTRACTPrevious research suggests that children’s ability to label visual features (e.g. “red”) and dimensions (e.g. “color”) impacts attention to visual dimensions. The goal of this study is to investigate variations in the quality of the neural system supporting dimensional label comprehension and production in relation to children’s dimensional attention skills. The current study recruited 3- to 4-year-old from the East Tennessee area to complete dimensional label tasks for color labels while recording functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in order to measure hemodynamic changes in left frontal, left parietal, and left temporal cortices previously implicated in dimensional attention. Different aspects of dimensional attention were evaluated using the dimensional priming task (measuring attentional stability), the dimensional change card sort (DCCS) task (measuring flexible dimensional attention), the triad classification task (measuring selective attention), and the matching task (measuring dimensional understanding). Dimensional label learning was measured using a color Production and color Comprehension task. Results indicated that the temporal cortex was activated during the dimensional label tasks. Further, we found that activation in parietal cortex during the dimensional label tasks increased with better performance on the dimensional attention tasks. On the other hand, activation in the temporal cortex and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex during the dimensional label tasks decreased with better performance on the dimensional attention tasks. These results suggest that dimensional attention skills can reveal variations in the quality of neural representations supporting dimensional label learning. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
先前的研究表明,儿童标记视觉特征(如“红色”)和维度(如“颜色”)的能力会影响对视觉维度的注意。本研究的目的是探讨支持维度标签理解和产生的神经系统质量的变化与儿童维度注意技能的关系。本研究从田纳西州东部地区招募了3- 4岁的儿童,让他们完成颜色标签的维度标签任务,同时记录功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS),以测量左额叶、左顶叶和左颞叶皮层先前与维度注意力有关的血流动力学变化。采用维度启动任务(测量注意稳定性)、维度变化卡排序任务(测量灵活维度注意)、三联分类任务(测量选择性注意)和匹配任务(测量维度理解)对维度注意的不同方面进行评价。维度标签学习使用颜色生产和颜色理解任务进行测量。结果表明,在维度标签任务中,颞叶皮层被激活。此外,我们发现在维度标签任务中,顶叶皮层的激活增加,在维度注意任务中表现更好。另一方面,在维度标签任务中,颞叶皮层和腹外侧前额叶皮层的激活减少,在维度注意任务中表现较好。这些结果表明,维度注意技能可以揭示支持维度标签学习的神经表征质量的变化。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明支持本研究结果的数据可应要求从通讯作者处获得。
{"title":"Examining Neural Dynamics During Dimensional Label Comprehension and Production as a Function of Dimensional Attention","authors":"Hollis R. Heim, Kara Lowery, Rachel Eddings, Bhoomika Nikam, Anastasia Kerr-German, Aaron T. Buss","doi":"10.1080/15248372.2023.2256859","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2256859","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPrevious research suggests that children’s ability to label visual features (e.g. “red”) and dimensions (e.g. “color”) impacts attention to visual dimensions. The goal of this study is to investigate variations in the quality of the neural system supporting dimensional label comprehension and production in relation to children’s dimensional attention skills. The current study recruited 3- to 4-year-old from the East Tennessee area to complete dimensional label tasks for color labels while recording functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in order to measure hemodynamic changes in left frontal, left parietal, and left temporal cortices previously implicated in dimensional attention. Different aspects of dimensional attention were evaluated using the dimensional priming task (measuring attentional stability), the dimensional change card sort (DCCS) task (measuring flexible dimensional attention), the triad classification task (measuring selective attention), and the matching task (measuring dimensional understanding). Dimensional label learning was measured using a color Production and color Comprehension task. Results indicated that the temporal cortex was activated during the dimensional label tasks. Further, we found that activation in parietal cortex during the dimensional label tasks increased with better performance on the dimensional attention tasks. On the other hand, activation in the temporal cortex and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex during the dimensional label tasks decreased with better performance on the dimensional attention tasks. These results suggest that dimensional attention skills can reveal variations in the quality of neural representations supporting dimensional label learning. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.","PeriodicalId":47680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136152619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Childhood Educators’ Math Anxiety and Its Relation to Their Pedagogic Actions in Swedish Preschools 瑞典学前教育工作者的数学焦虑及其与教学行为的关系
2区 心理学 Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2023.2256844
Laura Galeano, Christine Fawcett, Linda Forssman, Gustaf Gredebäck
Early childhood educators’ math anxiety and its relation to their frequency of pedagogic actions was examined through a questionnaire completed by 352 participants (aged 21–65) representative of the Swedish municipality where the study was conducted. Our sample contained 189 certified preschool teachers and 163 preschool caregivers who significantly differed in their ratings reported for math teaching anxiety. Results revealed that certified preschool teachers who reported higher levels of math anxiety also reported teaching and talking about mathematics content less frequently. When controlling for certified preschool teachers’ gender and age, years of work in preschools, and whether they work only with younger (1–3), older (4–6) or with both groups of children (1–6-year-old), certified preschool teachers’ general math anxiety and math teaching anxiety predicted their reported frequency of math teaching and frequency of conversations about numbers, patterns, and geometric concepts with peak strength in gatherings, excursions and situations designed to teach mathematics to preschool children. Preschool caregivers’ math anxiety measures and their reported frequency of pedagogic actions did not display statistically significant relations. Findings showed setting specific associations between certified preschool teachers general math anxiety, math teaching anxiety and their avoidance of mathematics content, highlighting the importance of early childhood educators’ awareness of math anxiety, its nature, and consequences for teaching practices.
研究人员通过一份问卷调查了儿童早期教育工作者的数学焦虑及其与教学行为频率的关系,352名参与者(年龄21-65岁)代表了瑞典市政当局进行了这项研究。我们的样本包含189名合格的幼儿教师和163名幼儿看护人,他们在数学教学焦虑方面的评分存在显著差异。结果显示,报告数学焦虑程度较高的合格幼儿园教师也报告说,教学和谈论数学内容的频率较低。当控制认证幼儿教师的性别和年龄,在幼儿园工作的年限,以及他们是否只与年龄较小的(1-3岁),年龄较大的(4-6岁)或两组儿童(1 - 6岁)一起工作时,认证幼儿教师的一般数学焦虑和数学教学焦虑预测了他们报告的数学教学频率以及在聚会中关于数字,模式和几何概念的谈话频率。为教学龄前儿童数学而设计的游览和情景。学龄前照顾者的数学焦虑测量和他们报告的教学行为频率没有显示统计学上显著的关系。研究结果显示,注册幼儿教师一般数学焦虑、数学教学焦虑和他们对数学内容的回避之间存在特定的关联,突出了幼儿教育者对数学焦虑的认识、数学焦虑的性质及其对教学实践的影响的重要性。
{"title":"Early Childhood Educators’ Math Anxiety and Its Relation to Their Pedagogic Actions in Swedish Preschools","authors":"Laura Galeano, Christine Fawcett, Linda Forssman, Gustaf Gredebäck","doi":"10.1080/15248372.2023.2256844","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2256844","url":null,"abstract":"Early childhood educators’ math anxiety and its relation to their frequency of pedagogic actions was examined through a questionnaire completed by 352 participants (aged 21–65) representative of the Swedish municipality where the study was conducted. Our sample contained 189 certified preschool teachers and 163 preschool caregivers who significantly differed in their ratings reported for math teaching anxiety. Results revealed that certified preschool teachers who reported higher levels of math anxiety also reported teaching and talking about mathematics content less frequently. When controlling for certified preschool teachers’ gender and age, years of work in preschools, and whether they work only with younger (1–3), older (4–6) or with both groups of children (1–6-year-old), certified preschool teachers’ general math anxiety and math teaching anxiety predicted their reported frequency of math teaching and frequency of conversations about numbers, patterns, and geometric concepts with peak strength in gatherings, excursions and situations designed to teach mathematics to preschool children. Preschool caregivers’ math anxiety measures and their reported frequency of pedagogic actions did not display statistically significant relations. Findings showed setting specific associations between certified preschool teachers general math anxiety, math teaching anxiety and their avoidance of mathematics content, highlighting the importance of early childhood educators’ awareness of math anxiety, its nature, and consequences for teaching practices.","PeriodicalId":47680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135436248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Cognition and Development
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1