Psychology of Violence最新文献

英文中文

Group psychological abuse perpetration: Development and validation of a measure using classical and modern test theory. 群体心理虐待的实施:古典与现代测试理论的发展与验证。

2区心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Psychology of Violence

Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1037/vio0000455

Omar Saldaña, Emma Antelo, Álvaro Rodríguez-Carballeira

引用次数: 0

Coercive control in police reports of intimate partner violence: Conceptual definition and association with recidivism. 警察报告中关于亲密伴侣暴力的强制控制:概念定义及其与累犯的关系。

2区心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Psychology of Violence

Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1037/vio0000457

N. Zoe Hilton, Angela W. Eke, Soyeon Kim, Elke Ham

引用次数: 0

Do violent attitude measures assess evaluative attitudes toward violence? 暴力态度测量是否能评估对暴力的评价态度?

2区心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Psychology of Violence

Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1037/vio0000470

Kevin L. Nunes, Chloe I. Pedneault, Chantal A. Hermann, Julia M. Fraser

引用次数: 0

Sexual and Gender Minority Men's Bystander Behaviors and Barriers in Response to Witnessing Minor Sexual Aggression. 性与性别少数群体男性在目睹未成年人性侵犯时的旁观行为与障碍。

IF 2.4 2区心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Psychology of Violence

Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-11 DOI: 10.1037/vio0000475

Tiffany L Marcantonio, Ruschelle M Leone, Andrew M O'Neil, Kristen N Jozkowski

Objective: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) men experience sexual assault victimization. Encouraging people to become involved when they witness high-risk sexual situations as a prosocial bystander is one preventative mechanism to address sexual assault victimization. However, research assessing the extent that SGM men will intervene when they witness a concerning male-to-male sexual situation and barriers that prevent intervention is lacking. We sought to address these gaps.

Method: SGM men (n = 323, M_age = 39.4, range 18-77) completed a web-administered survey. Participants were asked if they had witnessed a high-risk sexual situation and, if so, to describe how they intervened; if they did not intervene, they were asked to explain why not. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Nearly 50% (n = 157) of participants reported witnessing a situation that may require intervention, of those men 40% reported involvement. When SGM men intervened, their behaviors included direct and indirect verbal and nonverbal strategies. Reasons for not intervening included not appraising the situation as risky, not viewing it as their responsibility to intervene, or lacking the self-efficacy to act.

Conclusion: SGM men reported similar barriers to intervention that heterosexual young adults encounter. Participants also provided a variety of intervention tactics that could be included in bystander intervention initiatives to increase their effectiveness and inclusivity. Additional efforts are needed to modify intervention initiatives at both the individual and community level.

目的：性与性别少数群体（SGM）男性会遭受性侵犯。鼓励人们在目睹高风险的性状况时以亲社会旁观者的身份参与其中，是解决性侵犯受害问题的一种预防机制。然而，目前还缺乏研究来评估 SGM 男性在目睹令人担忧的男男性行为时会在多大程度上进行干预，以及阻碍干预的障碍。我们试图填补这些空白：SGM 男性（n = 323，年龄 = 39.4，18-77 岁之间）完成了一项网络调查。调查询问参与者是否目睹过高风险的性状况，如果目睹过，请描述他们是如何干预的；如果没有干预，请解释原因。数据采用主题分析法进行分析：近 50%（n = 157）的参与者报告说目睹了可能需要干预的情况，其中 40% 的男性报告说参与了干预。当 SGM 男性进行干预时，他们的行为包括直接和间接的语言和非语言策略。不干预的原因包括不认为情况有风险、不认为干预是自己的责任或缺乏采取行动的自我效能感：结论：SGM 男性报告的干预障碍与异性恋青年遇到的障碍相似。参与者还提供了各种干预策略，可将其纳入旁观者干预措施，以提高其有效性和包容性。还需要做出更多努力，在个人和社区层面修改干预措施。

{"title":"Sexual and Gender Minority Men's Bystander Behaviors and Barriers in Response to Witnessing Minor Sexual Aggression.","authors":"Tiffany L Marcantonio, Ruschelle M Leone, Andrew M O'Neil, Kristen N Jozkowski","doi":"10.1037/vio0000475","DOIUrl":"10.1037/vio0000475","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) men experience sexual assault victimization. Encouraging people to become involved when they witness high-risk sexual situations as a prosocial bystander is one preventative mechanism to address sexual assault victimization. However, research assessing the extent that SGM men will intervene when they witness a concerning male-to-male sexual situation and barriers that prevent intervention is lacking. We sought to address these gaps.Method: SGM men (n = 323, Mage = 39.4, range 18-77) completed a web-administered survey. Participants were asked if they had witnessed a high-risk sexual situation and, if so, to describe how they intervened; if they did not intervene, they were asked to explain why not. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.Results: Nearly 50% (n = 157) of participants reported witnessing a situation that may require intervention, of those men 40% reported involvement. When SGM men intervened, their behaviors included direct and indirect verbal and nonverbal strategies. Reasons for not intervening included not appraising the situation as risky, not viewing it as their responsibility to intervene, or lacking the self-efficacy to act.Conclusion: SGM men reported similar barriers to intervention that heterosexual young adults encounter. Participants also provided a variety of intervention tactics that could be included in bystander intervention initiatives to increase their effectiveness and inclusivity. Additional efforts are needed to modify intervention initiatives at both the individual and community level.","PeriodicalId":47876,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Violence","volume":"13 4","pages":"319-328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358722/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9865663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

(Mis)Perceptions of bystander behaviors and approval: The role of gender-specific perceived norms. （Mis）对旁观者行为的感知和认可：特定性别感知规范的作用。

IF 2.4 2区心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Psychology of Violence

Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-10 DOI: 10.1037/vio0000468

Laura C Wolter, Lucy E Napper

Objective: The current study examines college students' perceptions of same-gender and opposite gender peer norms for bystander behaviors in drinking contexts, as well as the association between perceived norms and participants' willingness to intervene and actual behavior.

Method: Participants completed an online survey assessing bystander-related perceived norms, willingness, and behavior. A subset of participants also completed a measure of bystander behavior 4-months later.

Results: The results indicated a divergent pattern of normative misperceptions for descriptive and injunctive norms, in which participants overestimated descriptive norms and underestimated injunctive norms. Further, participants who perceived greater perceived injunctive norms reported greater willingness to intervene in the future. While those who perceived that their peers intervened more frequently were more likely to have engaged in bystander behavior at baseline and the four-month follow-up.

Conclusions: Results also suggest that the role of gender-specific norms is complex and dependent on participants' own gender. The results indicate the potential value of developing norms-based interventions addressing bystander behaviors and implications for the types of normative misperceptions to target.

目的：本研究考察了大学生对饮酒环境中旁观者行为的同性和异性同伴规范的感知，以及感知规范与参与者干预意愿和实际行为之间的关系。方法：参与者完成了一项在线调查，评估与旁观者相关的感知规范、意愿和行为。一部分参与者在4个月后完成了对旁观者行为的测量。结果：研究结果表明，参与者对描述性规范和禁令性规范存在不同的规范误解模式，其中参与者高估了描述性规范，低估了禁令性规范。此外，感知到更强的禁令规范的参与者报告说，他们更愿意在未来进行干预。而那些认为同龄人干预频率更高的人更有可能在基线和四个月的随访中参与旁观者行为。结论：结果还表明，特定性别规范的作用是复杂的，取决于参与者自己的性别。研究结果表明，制定基于规范的干预措施，解决旁观者行为的潜在价值，以及对所针对的规范误解类型的影响。

{"title":"(Mis)Perceptions of bystander behaviors and approval: The role of gender-specific perceived norms.","authors":"Laura C Wolter, Lucy E Napper","doi":"10.1037/vio0000468","DOIUrl":"10.1037/vio0000468","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The current study examines college students' perceptions of same-gender and opposite gender peer norms for bystander behaviors in drinking contexts, as well as the association between perceived norms and participants' willingness to intervene and actual behavior.Method: Participants completed an online survey assessing bystander-related perceived norms, willingness, and behavior. A subset of participants also completed a measure of bystander behavior 4-months later.Results: The results indicated a divergent pattern of normative misperceptions for descriptive and injunctive norms, in which participants overestimated descriptive norms and underestimated injunctive norms. Further, participants who perceived greater perceived injunctive norms reported greater willingness to intervene in the future. While those who perceived that their peers intervened more frequently were more likely to have engaged in bystander behavior at baseline and the four-month follow-up.Conclusions: Results also suggest that the role of gender-specific norms is complex and dependent on participants' own gender. The results indicate the potential value of developing norms-based interventions addressing bystander behaviors and implications for the types of normative misperceptions to target.","PeriodicalId":47876,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Violence","volume":"13 4","pages":"329-337"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506847/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41113742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

When does technology use within dating relationships cross the line? A thematic analysis of semistructured interviews with young adults. 什么时候科技在约会关系中的使用会越界?对年轻人半结构化访谈的主题分析。