Pub Date : 2022-09-08DOI: 10.1080/00167428.2022.2119854
Franklin Halprin
ABSTRACT Bear management in New Jersey is controversial. The Division of Fish and Wildlife’s policies have not reassured factions who oppose their tools, namely hunting, despite being informed by science. This study applies qualitative content analysis to 43 policy documents to understand how actors pursue policy objectives, and how they are shaped. I find that actors pursue their policy objectives by making hybrid arguments that, in addition to science, involve history, values, and institutional power. Thus, they make scientific claims—or claims to what the science might mean—that are incompatible with each other. This study identifies four ways in which this occurs: science gets framed, science gets applied to certain ends, science gets weaponized, and science gets minimized. Comprehending the ways in which these factors supplement and frame science could reduce conflict, improve communication, and build consensus.
{"title":"Hybrid Policy in New Jersey Bear Management Conflict","authors":"Franklin Halprin","doi":"10.1080/00167428.2022.2119854","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2022.2119854","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Bear management in New Jersey is controversial. The Division of Fish and Wildlife’s policies have not reassured factions who oppose their tools, namely hunting, despite being informed by science. This study applies qualitative content analysis to 43 policy documents to understand how actors pursue policy objectives, and how they are shaped. I find that actors pursue their policy objectives by making hybrid arguments that, in addition to science, involve history, values, and institutional power. Thus, they make scientific claims—or claims to what the science might mean—that are incompatible with each other. This study identifies four ways in which this occurs: science gets framed, science gets applied to certain ends, science gets weaponized, and science gets minimized. Comprehending the ways in which these factors supplement and frame science could reduce conflict, improve communication, and build consensus.","PeriodicalId":47939,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83543167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-29DOI: 10.1080/00167428.2022.2118600
William W. Doe, Kenneth E. Foote
ABSTRACT The U.S. is currently experiencing an unparalleled transformation of its commemorative landscapes. Statues and memorials that have stood for decades are being removed. In particular, memorials associated with the Confederacy from the American Civil War are being addressed. The case of commemoration of Confederate General Robert E. Lee at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, New York, offers a unique perspective on the difficulties of untangling the many legacies of the Civil War that are commemorated in the American landscape. Lee was a graduate of the Academy, a Superintendent, and had a distinguished career as an Army officer, before joining the Confederacy. He became its most prominent and honored General. The evolution of Lee’s landscape commemoration at West Point parallels significant historical events in American society and within the Army over more than 150 years. An examination of this evolution in a broader geographical and historical context is warranted.
{"title":"Robert E. Lee at West Point: Contested Landscapes and Legacies of the Civil War","authors":"William W. Doe, Kenneth E. Foote","doi":"10.1080/00167428.2022.2118600","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2022.2118600","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The U.S. is currently experiencing an unparalleled transformation of its commemorative landscapes. Statues and memorials that have stood for decades are being removed. In particular, memorials associated with the Confederacy from the American Civil War are being addressed. The case of commemoration of Confederate General Robert E. Lee at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, New York, offers a unique perspective on the difficulties of untangling the many legacies of the Civil War that are commemorated in the American landscape. Lee was a graduate of the Academy, a Superintendent, and had a distinguished career as an Army officer, before joining the Confederacy. He became its most prominent and honored General. The evolution of Lee’s landscape commemoration at West Point parallels significant historical events in American society and within the Army over more than 150 years. An examination of this evolution in a broader geographical and historical context is warranted.","PeriodicalId":47939,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86491884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-16DOI: 10.1080/00167428.2022.2107363
Russ Kirby
This monograph explores the many ways that the World Wide Web, cloud computing, and the Internet-of-things are forcing us to reframe our thinking about cartographies of the world around us. Like Aladdin’s lamp when gently rubbed, the genie is out, never to return to the world we knew before. While the author provides no explicit definition for the term “digital geographies,” it is commonly understood that digital geographies are produced using digital technologies that expand our prior understanding of the “real world,” and the cartographies and geographies thereof. Given the widening roles of social media as platforms for expression and influence, it seems quite worthwhile to explore how digital technologies are changing the way spatial representations of phenomena, both real and imagined, are displayed and used in contemporary society. This monograph follows in the footsteps of James Ash, Rob Kitchin, and Agnieszka Leszczynski’s edited volume on Digital Geographies, but rather than focusing on how digital technologies are transforming subfields of the discipline of geography, Jessica McLean examines the ways in which digital geographies contribute to larger themes reflecting the future of human society and planet Earth as a habitat for humans as well. Using primarily qualitative research methods, McLean provides separate chapters focusing on human rights and technology, digital rights and justice, indigenous peoples, changing climates and environments, greening and sustainability, the “digital Anthropocene,” feminism and digital spaces (with a special focus on the Australian context), and disability activism. Many of the chapters explore aspects of the “more-than-real,” a concept initially explored in the brief introduction to the monograph and interwoven through most of the chapters that follow. The book concludes with some broader thoughts about the more-than-real and its implications for our understanding of digital geographies. The author employed a variety of qualitative research methods to collect and analyze data about digital geographies, and how they are influencing lived experiences, transforming conversations and understandings of environments of populations. The author collected data through semistructured interviews, participant observation, content and discourse analysis of social media materials, and examination of digital archival material. A group of 15
这本专著探讨了万维网、云计算和物联网迫使我们重新构建我们对周围世界地图的思考的许多方式。就像轻轻摩擦阿拉丁的神灯一样，精灵消失了，再也不会回到我们以前熟悉的世界。虽然作者没有为“数字地理”一词提供明确的定义，但人们普遍认为，数字地理是使用数字技术产生的，它扩展了我们对“现实世界”及其制图和地理的先前理解。鉴于社交媒体作为表达和影响平台的作用日益扩大，探索数字技术如何改变当代社会中真实和想象现象的空间表现方式和使用方式似乎非常值得。这本专着遵循了James Ash, Rob Kitchin和Agnieszka Leszczynski编辑的数字地理学的脚步，但不是专注于数字技术如何改变地理学科的子领域，Jessica McLean研究了数字地理学如何为反映人类社会和地球作为人类栖息地的未来的更大主题做出贡献。麦克莱恩主要使用定性研究方法，提供了单独的章节，重点关注人权和技术、数字权利和正义、土著人民、气候和环境变化、绿化和可持续性、“数字人类世”、女权主义和数字空间(特别关注澳大利亚的背景)以及残疾人行动主义。许多章节探讨了“超越真实”的各个方面，这个概念最初在专著的简要介绍中探讨过，并在随后的大多数章节中交织在一起。这本书总结了一些更广泛的想法，关于超越现实及其对我们理解数字地理学的影响。作者采用了多种定性研究方法来收集和分析有关数字地理的数据，以及它们如何影响生活体验，改变人们对环境的对话和理解。作者通过半结构化访谈、参与式观察、社交媒体材料的内容与话语分析、数字档案材料的检验等方法收集数据。一组15人
{"title":"CHANGING DIGITAL GEOGRAPHIES: Technologies, Environments and People","authors":"Russ Kirby","doi":"10.1080/00167428.2022.2107363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2022.2107363","url":null,"abstract":"This monograph explores the many ways that the World Wide Web, cloud computing, and the Internet-of-things are forcing us to reframe our thinking about cartographies of the world around us. Like Aladdin’s lamp when gently rubbed, the genie is out, never to return to the world we knew before. While the author provides no explicit definition for the term “digital geographies,” it is commonly understood that digital geographies are produced using digital technologies that expand our prior understanding of the “real world,” and the cartographies and geographies thereof. Given the widening roles of social media as platforms for expression and influence, it seems quite worthwhile to explore how digital technologies are changing the way spatial representations of phenomena, both real and imagined, are displayed and used in contemporary society. This monograph follows in the footsteps of James Ash, Rob Kitchin, and Agnieszka Leszczynski’s edited volume on Digital Geographies, but rather than focusing on how digital technologies are transforming subfields of the discipline of geography, Jessica McLean examines the ways in which digital geographies contribute to larger themes reflecting the future of human society and planet Earth as a habitat for humans as well. Using primarily qualitative research methods, McLean provides separate chapters focusing on human rights and technology, digital rights and justice, indigenous peoples, changing climates and environments, greening and sustainability, the “digital Anthropocene,” feminism and digital spaces (with a special focus on the Australian context), and disability activism. Many of the chapters explore aspects of the “more-than-real,” a concept initially explored in the brief introduction to the monograph and interwoven through most of the chapters that follow. The book concludes with some broader thoughts about the more-than-real and its implications for our understanding of digital geographies. The author employed a variety of qualitative research methods to collect and analyze data about digital geographies, and how they are influencing lived experiences, transforming conversations and understandings of environments of populations. The author collected data through semistructured interviews, participant observation, content and discourse analysis of social media materials, and examination of digital archival material. A group of 15","PeriodicalId":47939,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72842516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-16DOI: 10.1080/00167428.2022.2107364
Joseph L. Scarpaci
{"title":"DECOLONIZING GEOGRAPHY: An Introduction","authors":"Joseph L. Scarpaci","doi":"10.1080/00167428.2022.2107364","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2022.2107364","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47939,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73283781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-16DOI: 10.1080/00167428.2022.2107362
D. Zoppolato
Since its launch, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the China-led economic and cultural development strategy, captured impressive media and scholarly attention and critiques. Whether for its ability to offer an alternative model of economic integration and cooperation—for the amount of fundings and financing mobilized—or for its open challenge to Western-led global governance institutions, BRI is now central in a wide array of academic disciplines, ranging from international relations via economics, law, public policy, to geography. The two books under review provide a critical and in-depth analysis of the BRI, particularly relevant for the readers of Geographical Review. Miller, senior Asia analyst at Gavekal Group, in the second edition of China’s Asian Dream published in 2019, assesses how China, with the BRI, attempts to regain centrality in the international order (Miller 2019). The second edition only slightly modifies the 2017 text by adding a short preface and including in the conclusion’s references to the Trump presidency and its position on China. The BRI focused, especially in the time frame analyzed by the author (2014–2015), on China’s quest for energy and natural resources. Whether securing access to energy and natural resources, or reducing geopolitical risks as in the case of the development of Gwadar and Kyaukphyu, energy plays a pivotal role in the BRI. The book, after offering a background to the BRI, moves the analysis to the focus of the Communist Party of China (CPC) on its western regions, in particular Xinjiang. The book is organized around Asian’s subregions and uncovers how the BRI is spreading in Central (chapter 2), South (chapter 5), and Southeast (chapter 3, 4, and 6) Asia. Miller connects the China’s “Go-West” policy with the rise of infrastructure financing as a key component of the international donor community where China is taking the lead. Chinese policy banks and stateowned enterprises are for the author the “real” actors behind the implementation of the BRI. The author skillfully combines interviews conducted during extensive travel in Asia, with insightful and rich geopolitical and geoeconomics observations. Local stories of people experiencing the materiality of Chinese power coupled with interviews with the Chinese expat community living in Asian countries shed light on the complexity of the BRI. Miller considers the BRI as the coronation of the economic resurgence of the country. For the CPC
{"title":"CHINA’S ASIAN DREAM: Empire Building along the New Silk RoadGEOCULTURAL POWER: China’s Quest to Revive the Silk Roads for the Twenty-First Century","authors":"D. Zoppolato","doi":"10.1080/00167428.2022.2107362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2022.2107362","url":null,"abstract":"Since its launch, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the China-led economic and cultural development strategy, captured impressive media and scholarly attention and critiques. Whether for its ability to offer an alternative model of economic integration and cooperation—for the amount of fundings and financing mobilized—or for its open challenge to Western-led global governance institutions, BRI is now central in a wide array of academic disciplines, ranging from international relations via economics, law, public policy, to geography. The two books under review provide a critical and in-depth analysis of the BRI, particularly relevant for the readers of Geographical Review. Miller, senior Asia analyst at Gavekal Group, in the second edition of China’s Asian Dream published in 2019, assesses how China, with the BRI, attempts to regain centrality in the international order (Miller 2019). The second edition only slightly modifies the 2017 text by adding a short preface and including in the conclusion’s references to the Trump presidency and its position on China. The BRI focused, especially in the time frame analyzed by the author (2014–2015), on China’s quest for energy and natural resources. Whether securing access to energy and natural resources, or reducing geopolitical risks as in the case of the development of Gwadar and Kyaukphyu, energy plays a pivotal role in the BRI. The book, after offering a background to the BRI, moves the analysis to the focus of the Communist Party of China (CPC) on its western regions, in particular Xinjiang. The book is organized around Asian’s subregions and uncovers how the BRI is spreading in Central (chapter 2), South (chapter 5), and Southeast (chapter 3, 4, and 6) Asia. Miller connects the China’s “Go-West” policy with the rise of infrastructure financing as a key component of the international donor community where China is taking the lead. Chinese policy banks and stateowned enterprises are for the author the “real” actors behind the implementation of the BRI. The author skillfully combines interviews conducted during extensive travel in Asia, with insightful and rich geopolitical and geoeconomics observations. Local stories of people experiencing the materiality of Chinese power coupled with interviews with the Chinese expat community living in Asian countries shed light on the complexity of the BRI. Miller considers the BRI as the coronation of the economic resurgence of the country. For the CPC","PeriodicalId":47939,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81332530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-08DOI: 10.1080/00167428.2021.1933778
Joseph L. Scarpaci
{"title":"TRACES OF J. B. JACKSON: The Man Who Taught Us To See Everyday America","authors":"Joseph L. Scarpaci","doi":"10.1080/00167428.2021.1933778","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2021.1933778","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47939,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82643563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-02DOI: 10.1080/00167428.2022.2085103
Andrew Bagwell, H. Brown, Carly Pugh, Kathleen Schroeder, Charles F. Weir, Quincy D. Williams
ABSTRACT This article explores how Community Based Organizations, in Watauga County, North Carolina, faced a food crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic and quickly came together to fill unprecedented local need for food assistance. Existing bodies of literature on Appalachia and resilience provide useful frameworks for disecting how the community reacted to events as they occurred in the Spring of 2020. Interviews with community leaders document their experiences in the early stages of the pandemic. We conclude that an already frayed social safety net contributed to the crises; but local leaders were able to respond because of their strong community ties and years of local experience. These community leaders explain that the food crisis caused by Covid-19 revealed deep cracks that have long existed in the food system.
{"title":"COMMUNITY FOOD RESILIENCE IN THE TIME OF COVID: AN EXAMPLE FROM AN APPALACHIAN COUNTY","authors":"Andrew Bagwell, H. Brown, Carly Pugh, Kathleen Schroeder, Charles F. Weir, Quincy D. Williams","doi":"10.1080/00167428.2022.2085103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2022.2085103","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores how Community Based Organizations, in Watauga County, North Carolina, faced a food crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic and quickly came together to fill unprecedented local need for food assistance. Existing bodies of literature on Appalachia and resilience provide useful frameworks for disecting how the community reacted to events as they occurred in the Spring of 2020. Interviews with community leaders document their experiences in the early stages of the pandemic. We conclude that an already frayed social safety net contributed to the crises; but local leaders were able to respond because of their strong community ties and years of local experience. These community leaders explain that the food crisis caused by Covid-19 revealed deep cracks that have long existed in the food system.","PeriodicalId":47939,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80145086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-02DOI: 10.1080/00167428.2022.2085104
A. Quandt, Phevee Paderes
ABSTRACT Resilience thinking is a common component in the planning and implementation of interventions in humanitarian activities, disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation, and food security. Attention to the concept of livelihood resilience specifically has grown in these sectors in order to improve households’ resilience to the impacts of climate change and other shocks. However, resilience is difficult to empirically measure and commonly-used approaches are top-down, expert-driven, and suffer from measurement-bias. To address these issues, in this paper we explore the contributions of geographers to this research, critique top-down objective measurements of resilience, highlight the benefits of employing subjective conceptualizations of resilience, and outline methods for measuring subjective resilience with participatory methods. By drawing from both objective and subjective methods of analysis we can expand upon the normative questions of “resilience of what, to what, and for whom” to include “resilience as defined and measured by whom” in future research and policy-making.
{"title":"LIVELIHOOD RESILIENCE AND GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE: TOWARD INTEGRATION OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE APPROACHES OF ANALYSIS","authors":"A. Quandt, Phevee Paderes","doi":"10.1080/00167428.2022.2085104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2022.2085104","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Resilience thinking is a common component in the planning and implementation of interventions in humanitarian activities, disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation, and food security. Attention to the concept of livelihood resilience specifically has grown in these sectors in order to improve households’ resilience to the impacts of climate change and other shocks. However, resilience is difficult to empirically measure and commonly-used approaches are top-down, expert-driven, and suffer from measurement-bias. To address these issues, in this paper we explore the contributions of geographers to this research, critique top-down objective measurements of resilience, highlight the benefits of employing subjective conceptualizations of resilience, and outline methods for measuring subjective resilience with participatory methods. By drawing from both objective and subjective methods of analysis we can expand upon the normative questions of “resilience of what, to what, and for whom” to include “resilience as defined and measured by whom” in future research and policy-making.","PeriodicalId":47939,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76225513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-24DOI: 10.1080/00167428.2022.2054341
Holly R. Barcus, William G. Moseley
ABSTRACT The key organizing theme for this special issue is “Sustaining Rural Systems: Rural Vitality in an Era of Globalization and Economic Nationalism.” The multiplicity of roles that rural communities play in economic and social systems are often overlooked in conversations about globalization and economic nationalism. Yet rural communities, economies and landscapes are closely tied to global industries, migrant flows and markets, while simultaneously subject to nationalist economic policies and strategies. These articles are drawn from the 2019 International Geographical Union Commission on the Sustainability of Rural Systems Colloquium and examine the interplay between rural places and the competing narratives of globalization and nationalism. The studies come from Croatia, Belgium, Australia, the USA, Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, Mexico, Italy and Spain. In each article, the authors seek to elucidate the nuanced ties between people and industries that are at once intensely local and simultaneously tied to regional and global processes. The articles challenge us to critically examine oversimplified messaging of highly complex systems and provide insights into processes of change at local scales across major global regions, highlighting the contemporary status of rural change through the lens of sustainability and set within current competing narratives of globalization and economic nationalism.
{"title":"SUSTAINING RURAL SYSTEMS: RURAL VITALITY IN AN ERA OF GLOBALIZATION AND ECONOMIC NATIONALISM","authors":"Holly R. Barcus, William G. Moseley","doi":"10.1080/00167428.2022.2054341","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2022.2054341","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The key organizing theme for this special issue is “Sustaining Rural Systems: Rural Vitality in an Era of Globalization and Economic Nationalism.” The multiplicity of roles that rural communities play in economic and social systems are often overlooked in conversations about globalization and economic nationalism. Yet rural communities, economies and landscapes are closely tied to global industries, migrant flows and markets, while simultaneously subject to nationalist economic policies and strategies. These articles are drawn from the 2019 International Geographical Union Commission on the Sustainability of Rural Systems Colloquium and examine the interplay between rural places and the competing narratives of globalization and nationalism. The studies come from Croatia, Belgium, Australia, the USA, Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, Mexico, Italy and Spain. In each article, the authors seek to elucidate the nuanced ties between people and industries that are at once intensely local and simultaneously tied to regional and global processes. The articles challenge us to critically examine oversimplified messaging of highly complex systems and provide insights into processes of change at local scales across major global regions, highlighting the contemporary status of rural change through the lens of sustainability and set within current competing narratives of globalization and economic nationalism.","PeriodicalId":47939,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84048273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-18DOI: 10.1080/00167428.2022.2072639
J. Bryson
{"title":"TOURISM, CULTURAL HERITAGE AND URBAN REGENERATION: Changing Spaces in Historical Places","authors":"J. Bryson","doi":"10.1080/00167428.2022.2072639","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2022.2072639","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47939,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84250755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：