Pub Date : 2023-01-31DOI: 10.1007/s11251-023-09618-8
Demian Scherer, Annika Verkühlen, S. Dutke
{"title":"Effects of related decorative pictures on learning and metacognition","authors":"Demian Scherer, Annika Verkühlen, S. Dutke","doi":"10.1007/s11251-023-09618-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09618-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47990,"journal":{"name":"Instructional Science","volume":"51 1","pages":"571 - 594"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46886828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-25DOI: 10.1007/s11251-023-09617-9
Einat Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. Haataja, M. Hannula, Enrique Garcia Moreno-Esteva
{"title":"What can eye-tracking, combined with discourse analysis, teach us about the ineffectiveness of a group of students solving a geometric problem?","authors":"Einat Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. Haataja, M. Hannula, Enrique Garcia Moreno-Esteva","doi":"10.1007/s11251-023-09617-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09617-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47990,"journal":{"name":"Instructional Science","volume":"51 1","pages":"363 - 396"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45587841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-23DOI: 10.1007/s11251-022-09609-1
K. Šeďová, Martin Sedlácek
{"title":"How vocal and silent forms of participation in combination relate to student achievement","authors":"K. Šeďová, Martin Sedlácek","doi":"10.1007/s11251-022-09609-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09609-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47990,"journal":{"name":"Instructional Science","volume":"51 1","pages":"343 - 361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42157988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-14DOI: 10.1007/s11251-022-09608-2
O. Atias, A. Baram‐Tsabari, Y. Kali, Ayelet Shavit
{"title":"In pursuit of mutual benefits in school-based citizen science: who wins what in a win-win situation?","authors":"O. Atias, A. Baram‐Tsabari, Y. Kali, Ayelet Shavit","doi":"10.1007/s11251-022-09608-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09608-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47990,"journal":{"name":"Instructional Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47867649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-11DOI: 10.1007/s11251-022-09614-4
Teeba Obaid, J. Nesbit, Ahmad Mahmoody Ghaidary, Misha Jain, Shiva Hajian
{"title":"Explanatory inferencing in simulation-based discovery learning: sequence analysis using the edit distance median string","authors":"Teeba Obaid, J. Nesbit, Ahmad Mahmoody Ghaidary, Misha Jain, Shiva Hajian","doi":"10.1007/s11251-022-09614-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09614-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47990,"journal":{"name":"Instructional Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46346579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-06DOI: 10.1007/s11251-022-09610-8
Amanda M. Cottone, Susan A. Yoon, Jooeun Shim, B. Coulter, Stacey Carman
{"title":"Evaluating the apt epistemic processes of data literacy in elementary school students","authors":"Amanda M. Cottone, Susan A. Yoon, Jooeun Shim, B. Coulter, Stacey Carman","doi":"10.1007/s11251-022-09610-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09610-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47990,"journal":{"name":"Instructional Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43613565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1007/s11251-022-09607-3
C. Matuk, M. Linn
{"title":"Students’ perceptions of the impacts of peer ideas in inquiry learning","authors":"C. Matuk, M. Linn","doi":"10.1007/s11251-022-09607-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09607-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47990,"journal":{"name":"Instructional Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45243073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
As science and technology create an ecosystem that is becoming increasingly more knowledge-intensive, complex, and interconnected, the next generation science standards include systems thinking and systems modeling among 21st skills that should be fostered. We examined the effect of an online cross-disciplinary learning process on the development of systems thinking and modeling skills among engineering students and engineering and science teachers. The study, which used quantitative and qualitative tools, included 55 participants who performed four food-related learning assignments and created conceptual models in Object-Process Methodology. Their responses to online assignments were analyzed along with their perceptions, captured via a reflection questionnaire. The online learning process in this study effectively enhanced systems thinking and modeling skills of all learners, including those with no relevant background. One main conclusion that extends beyond the online learning was that imparting the basics of systems thinking and conceptual modeling skills can be achieved even within a short period of time-less than one semester. The contribution of the study is the formation of theoretical and practical frameworks for the integration of an cross-disciplinary model-based systems engineering online assignments into engineering and science curricula.
{"title":"Fostering engineering and science students' and teachers' systems thinking and conceptual modeling skills.","authors":"Roee Peretz, Marina Tal, Effrat Akiri, Dov Dori, Yehudit Judy Dori","doi":"10.1007/s11251-023-09625-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11251-023-09625-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As science and technology create an ecosystem that is becoming increasingly more knowledge-intensive, complex, and interconnected, the next generation science standards include systems thinking and systems modeling among 21st skills that should be fostered. We examined the effect of an online cross-disciplinary learning process on the development of systems thinking and modeling skills among engineering students and engineering and science teachers. The study, which used quantitative and qualitative tools, included 55 participants who performed four food-related learning assignments and created conceptual models in Object-Process Methodology. Their responses to online assignments were analyzed along with their perceptions, captured via a reflection questionnaire. The online learning process in this study effectively enhanced systems thinking and modeling skills of all learners, including those with no relevant background. One main conclusion that extends beyond the online learning was that imparting the basics of systems thinking and conceptual modeling skills can be achieved even within a short period of time-less than one semester. The contribution of the study is the formation of theoretical and practical frameworks for the integration of an cross-disciplinary model-based systems engineering online assignments into engineering and science curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":47990,"journal":{"name":"Instructional Science","volume":"51 3","pages":"509-543"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012308/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9840543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1007/s11251-022-09606-4
Louise Maddens, Fien Depaepe, Annelies Raes, Jan Elen
In order to design learning environments that foster students' research skills, one can draw on instructional design models for complex learning, such as the 4C/ID model (in: van Merriënboer and Kirschner, Ten steps to complex learning, Routledge, London, 2018). However, few attempts have been undertaken to foster students' motivation towards learning complex skills in environments based on the 4C/ID model. This study explores the effects of providing autonomy, competence and relatedness support (in Deci and Ryan, Psychol Inquiry 11(4): 227-268, https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01, 2000) in a 4C/ID based online learning environment on upper secondary school behavioral sciences students' cognitive and motivational outcomes. Students' cognitive outcomes are measured by means of a research skills test consisting of short multiple choice and short answer items (in order to assess research skills in a broad way), and a research skills task in which students are asked to integrate their skills in writing a research proposal (in order to assess research skills in an integrative manner). Students' motivational outcomes are measured by means of students' autonomous and controlled motivation, and students' amotivation. A pretest-intervention-posttest design was set up in order to compare 233 upper secondary school behavioral sciences students' outcomes among (1) a 4C/ID based online learning environment condition, and (2) an identical condition additively providing support for students' need satisfaction. Both learning environments proved equally effective in improving students' scores on the research skills test. Students in the need supportive condition scored higher on the research skills task compared to their peers in the baseline condition. Students' autonomous and controlled motivation were not affected by the intervention. Although, unexpectedly, students' amotivation increased in both conditions, students' amotivation was lower in the need supportive condition compared to students in the baseline condition. Theoretical relationships were established between students' need satisfaction, students' motivation (autonomous, controlled, and amotivation), and students' cognitive outcomes. These findings are discussed taking into account the COVID-19 affected setting in which the study took place.
为了设计培养学生研究技能的学习环境,可以借鉴复杂学习的教学设计模型,如4C/ID模型(见:van Merriënboer和Kirschner,《Ten steps to complex learning》,Routledge, London, 2018)。然而,很少有人尝试在基于4C/ID模型的环境中培养学生学习复杂技能的动机。本研究探讨了在基于4C/ID的网络学习环境中提供自主性、能力和相关性支持对高中行为科学学生认知和动机结果的影响(见Deci和Ryan,《心理探究》11(4):227-268,https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01, 2000)。学生的认知结果是通过研究技能测试来衡量的,包括简短的多项选择和简短的回答项目(为了以广泛的方式评估研究技能),以及研究技能任务,其中要求学生将他们的技能整合到撰写研究计划中(为了以综合的方式评估研究技能)。学生的动机效果通过学生的自主动机和控制动机和学生的动机来衡量。采用前测-干预-后测设计,对233名高中行为科学学生在(1)基于4C/ID的在线学习环境条件和(2)相同条件下添加需求满足支持条件下的学习成绩进行比较。事实证明,这两种学习环境在提高学生研究技能测试成绩方面同样有效。与基线条件下的同龄人相比,需要支持条件下的学生在研究技能任务上得分更高。学生的自主动机和控制动机不受干预的影响。出乎意料的是,在两种情况下,学生的动机都有所增加,但与基线条件下的学生相比,需求支持条件下的学生动机较低。建立了学生需求满足、学生动机(自主动机、控制动机和动机动机)与学生认知结果之间的理论关系。考虑到研究发生的受COVID-19影响的环境,对这些发现进行了讨论。
{"title":"Fostering students' motivation towards learning research skills: the role of autonomy, competence and relatedness support.","authors":"Louise Maddens, Fien Depaepe, Annelies Raes, Jan Elen","doi":"10.1007/s11251-022-09606-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09606-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to design learning environments that foster students' research skills, one can draw on instructional design models for complex learning, such as the 4C/ID model (in: van Merriënboer and Kirschner, Ten steps to complex learning, Routledge, London, 2018). However, few attempts have been undertaken to foster students' <i>motivation</i> towards learning complex skills in environments based on the 4C/ID model. This study explores the effects of providing autonomy, competence and relatedness support (in Deci and Ryan, Psychol Inquiry 11(4): 227-268, https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01, 2000) in a 4C/ID based online learning environment on upper secondary school behavioral sciences students' cognitive and motivational outcomes. Students' cognitive outcomes are measured by means of a research skills test consisting of short multiple choice and short answer items (in order to assess research skills in a broad way), and a research skills task in which students are asked to integrate their skills in writing a research proposal (in order to assess research skills in an integrative manner). Students' motivational outcomes are measured by means of students' autonomous and controlled motivation, and students' amotivation. A pretest-intervention-posttest design was set up in order to compare 233 upper secondary school behavioral sciences students' outcomes among (1) a 4C/ID based online learning environment condition, and (2) an identical condition additively providing support for students' need satisfaction. Both learning environments proved equally effective in improving students' scores on the research skills test. Students in the need supportive condition scored higher on the research skills task compared to their peers in the baseline condition. Students' autonomous and controlled motivation were not affected by the intervention. Although, unexpectedly, students' amotivation increased in both conditions, students' amotivation was lower in the need supportive condition compared to students in the baseline condition. Theoretical relationships were established between students' need satisfaction, students' motivation (autonomous, controlled, and amotivation), and students' cognitive outcomes. These findings are discussed taking into account the COVID-19 affected setting in which the study took place.</p>","PeriodicalId":47990,"journal":{"name":"Instructional Science","volume":"51 1","pages":"165-199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9786465/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10658807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2023-02-28DOI: 10.1007/s11251-023-09623-x
Suzan van Brussel, Miranda Timmermans, Peter Verkoeijen, Fred Paas
Open-mindedness is defined as one's willingness and ability to consider opposing beliefs and perspectives and give them a serious, impartial consideration by setting aside one's commitment towards one's own beliefs and perspectives. Learning to prepare and teach open-minded lessons is a crucial skill for student teachers because it fosters an atmosphere in which pupils feel free to express their own views and to learn about the views of others. The aim of this experiment was to examine which instructional strategy best supports student teachers' learning to prepare an open-minded citizenship education lesson. Therefore, participants (n = 176) processed an instruction on how to prepare an open-minded citizenship education lesson through learning by teaching on video, preparing to teach, or re-study (control condition), and as a post-test designed a lesson plan. We examined the completeness and accuracy of the explanations of the instructional content, feelings of social presence and arousal, open-mindedness levels, the completeness and accuracy of the lesson plans, and the conceptual knowledge of the instructional content. In addition, the lesson plans were graded on overall quality. Results showed that all participants scored higher on open-mindedness as measured with the Actively Open-minded Thinking scale after the experiment than before the experiment. Participants in the control condition prepared significantly more accurate and complete open-minded lessons than participants in the other two conditions, suggesting they have gained better understanding of the instructional content. There were no significant differences between the conditions on the other outcome measures.
{"title":"Comparing instructional strategies to support student teachers' learning to prepare an open-minded citizenship education lesson.","authors":"Suzan van Brussel, Miranda Timmermans, Peter Verkoeijen, Fred Paas","doi":"10.1007/s11251-023-09623-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11251-023-09623-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open-mindedness is defined as one's willingness and ability to consider opposing beliefs and perspectives and give them a serious, impartial consideration by setting aside one's commitment towards one's own beliefs and perspectives. Learning to prepare and teach open-minded lessons is a crucial skill for student teachers because it fosters an atmosphere in which pupils feel free to express their own views and to learn about the views of others. The aim of this experiment was to examine which instructional strategy best supports student teachers' learning to prepare an open-minded citizenship education lesson. Therefore, participants (<i>n</i> = 176) processed an instruction on how to prepare an open-minded citizenship education lesson through learning by teaching on video, preparing to teach, or re-study (control condition), and as a post-test designed a lesson plan. We examined the completeness and accuracy of the explanations of the instructional content, feelings of social presence and arousal, open-mindedness levels, the completeness and accuracy of the lesson plans, and the conceptual knowledge of the instructional content. In addition, the lesson plans were graded on overall quality. Results showed that all participants scored higher on open-mindedness as measured with the Actively Open-minded Thinking scale after the experiment than before the experiment. Participants in the control condition prepared significantly more accurate and complete open-minded lessons than participants in the other two conditions, suggesting they have gained better understanding of the instructional content. There were no significant differences between the conditions on the other outcome measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47990,"journal":{"name":"Instructional Science","volume":"51 3","pages":"451-473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971685/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9840078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}