首页 > 最新文献

Public Understanding of Science最新文献

英文 中文
A 30-nation investigation of lay heritability beliefs. 对 30 个国家的非专业遗传信仰进行调查。
IF 4.1 2区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI: 10.1177/09636625241245030
L. Ferris, M. Hornsey, J. Morosoli, T. Milfont, Fiona Kate Barlow
Lay beliefs about human trait heritability are consequential for cooperation and social cohesion, yet there has been no global characterisation of these beliefs. Participants from 30 countries (N = 6128) reported heritability beliefs for intelligence, personality, body weight and criminality, and transnational factors that could influence these beliefs were explored using public nation-level data. Globally, mean lay beliefs differ from published heritability (h2) estimated by twin studies, with a worldwide majority overestimating the heritability of personality and intelligence, and underestimating body weight and criminality. Criminality was seen as substantially less attributable to genes than other traits. People from countries with high infant mortality tended to ascribe greater heritability for most traits, relative to people from low infant mortality countries. This study provides the first systematic foray into worldwide lay heritability beliefs. Future research must incorporate diverse global perspectives to further contextualise and extend upon these findings.
人们对人类特质遗传性的信念对合作和社会凝聚力具有重要影响,但目前还没有关于这些信念的全球性描述。来自 30 个国家的参与者(N = 6128)报告了智力、性格、体重和犯罪的遗传性信念,并利用国家级公共数据探讨了可能影响这些信念的跨国因素。在全球范围内,非专业人士的平均看法与双胞胎研究估算的遗传率(h2)不同,全球大多数人高估了性格和智力的遗传率,低估了体重和犯罪率。与其他特征相比,犯罪的遗传率要低得多。与婴儿死亡率低的国家的人相比,婴儿死亡率高的国家的人往往认为大多数特征的遗传率更高。这项研究首次系统地探讨了世界范围内非专业人士对遗传率的看法。未来的研究必须纳入全球不同的视角,以进一步了解和扩展这些发现。
{"title":"A 30-nation investigation of lay heritability beliefs.","authors":"L. Ferris, M. Hornsey, J. Morosoli, T. Milfont, Fiona Kate Barlow","doi":"10.1177/09636625241245030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241245030","url":null,"abstract":"Lay beliefs about human trait heritability are consequential for cooperation and social cohesion, yet there has been no global characterisation of these beliefs. Participants from 30 countries (N = 6128) reported heritability beliefs for intelligence, personality, body weight and criminality, and transnational factors that could influence these beliefs were explored using public nation-level data. Globally, mean lay beliefs differ from published heritability (h2) estimated by twin studies, with a worldwide majority overestimating the heritability of personality and intelligence, and underestimating body weight and criminality. Criminality was seen as substantially less attributable to genes than other traits. People from countries with high infant mortality tended to ascribe greater heritability for most traits, relative to people from low infant mortality countries. This study provides the first systematic foray into worldwide lay heritability beliefs. Future research must incorporate diverse global perspectives to further contextualise and extend upon these findings.","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140654625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Going beyond political ideology: A computational analysis of civic trust in science. 超越政治意识形态:公民对科学信任的计算分析。
IF 4.1 2区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI: 10.1177/09636625241246076
Sangwon Lee, Marshall A Taylor, Saifuddin Ahmed, Won-Ki Moon
Numerous studies have been conducted to identify the factors that predict trust/distrust in science. However, most of these studies are based on closed-ended survey research, which does not allow researchers to gain a more nuanced understanding of the phenomenon. This study integrated survey analysis conducted within the United States with computational text analysis to reveal factors previously obscured by traditional survey methodologies. Even after controlling for political ideology-which has been the most significant explanatory factor in determining trust in science within a survey framework-we found those with concerns over boundary-crossing (i.e. concerns or perceptions that science overlaps with politics, the government, and funding) were less likely to trust science than their counterparts.
为了确定预测科学信任/不信任的因素,已经开展了大量研究。然而,这些研究大多基于封闭式调查研究,无法让研究人员对这一现象有更细致的了解。本研究将在美国进行的调查分析与计算文本分析相结合,揭示了之前被传统调查方法所掩盖的因素。在调查框架内,政治意识形态一直是决定科学信任度的最重要的解释因素,即使在控制了政治意识形态之后,我们发现那些对跨界问题(即担心或认为科学与政治、政府和资金重叠)有顾虑的人也比他们的同类人更不可能信任科学。
{"title":"Going beyond political ideology: A computational analysis of civic trust in science.","authors":"Sangwon Lee, Marshall A Taylor, Saifuddin Ahmed, Won-Ki Moon","doi":"10.1177/09636625241246076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241246076","url":null,"abstract":"Numerous studies have been conducted to identify the factors that predict trust/distrust in science. However, most of these studies are based on closed-ended survey research, which does not allow researchers to gain a more nuanced understanding of the phenomenon. This study integrated survey analysis conducted within the United States with computational text analysis to reveal factors previously obscured by traditional survey methodologies. Even after controlling for political ideology-which has been the most significant explanatory factor in determining trust in science within a survey framework-we found those with concerns over boundary-crossing (i.e. concerns or perceptions that science overlaps with politics, the government, and funding) were less likely to trust science than their counterparts.","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140665827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effect of experts on attitude change in public-facing political science: Scientific communication on term limits in the United States. 专家对面向公众的政治学态度转变的影响:美国关于任期限制的科学传播。
IF 4.1 2区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI: 10.1177/09636625241246084
Aaron M. Houck, Aaron S. King, J. B. Taylor
How can scientists best inform the public and change attitudes? Does the message or the messenger matter more? We test the effect of scientific expert messengers and messages in a preregistered, nationally representative survey experiment in the United States. Consistent with our hypotheses, scientists can move public attitudes in areas where knowledge is based on a non-ideological misperception to a greater extent than the same science-based message from another source. Although we focus on political science as a field and Congressional term limits in the United States as a topic area, our findings have broader implications for science communication with policymaking relevance given the persistence of misperceptions among the public across all natural and social science research fields.
科学家如何才能最好地向公众提供信息并改变态度?是信息更重要还是信使更重要?我们在美国进行了一项预先登记、具有全国代表性的调查实验,检验了科学专家信使和信息的效果。与我们的假设一致,在那些基于非意识形态误解的知识领域,科学家比来自其他来源的相同科学信息更能改变公众的态度。尽管我们将政治科学作为一个领域,并将美国国会任期限制作为一个主题领域,但鉴于公众对所有自然科学和社会科学研究领域的误解持续存在,我们的发现对科学传播具有更广泛的决策意义。
{"title":"The effect of experts on attitude change in public-facing political science: Scientific communication on term limits in the United States.","authors":"Aaron M. Houck, Aaron S. King, J. B. Taylor","doi":"10.1177/09636625241246084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241246084","url":null,"abstract":"How can scientists best inform the public and change attitudes? Does the message or the messenger matter more? We test the effect of scientific expert messengers and messages in a preregistered, nationally representative survey experiment in the United States. Consistent with our hypotheses, scientists can move public attitudes in areas where knowledge is based on a non-ideological misperception to a greater extent than the same science-based message from another source. Although we focus on political science as a field and Congressional term limits in the United States as a topic area, our findings have broader implications for science communication with policymaking relevance given the persistence of misperceptions among the public across all natural and social science research fields.","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140663953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Book review: Geoff Mulgan When Science Meets Power 书评杰夫-马尔甘:当科学遇到权力
IF 4.1 2区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI: 10.1177/09636625241248501
Birte Fähnrich
{"title":"Book review: Geoff Mulgan When Science Meets Power","authors":"Birte Fähnrich","doi":"10.1177/09636625241248501","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241248501","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140670406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Citizens and conspiratorial anti-science beliefs: Opposition versus support in 38 countries across Europe 公民与反科学阴谋论:欧洲 38 个国家的反对与支持情况
IF 4.1 2区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI: 10.1177/09636625241245371
Joop de Boer, Harry Aiking
This article aims to clarify citizens’ responses to conspiratorial anti-science beliefs (e.g. “The cure for cancer exists but is hidden from the public by commercial interests”). Based on Eurobarometer 95.2 (Spring 2021, 38 countries), we examine how public opposition or support for conspiratorial anti-science beliefs is related to individual- and country-level variables. There were large differences between the countries in their opposition or support. Controlling for artifacts, the individual-level variables showed associations with science-specific variables, for example, knowledge, preferred communication sources, social evaluations of scientists, attitude toward vaccines, and more general political (dis)satisfaction. At the country level, Affluence and Women’s representation were useful indicators for describing these differences. The conclusion is that the negativity of conspiratorial anti-science beliefs can be avoided by policies that highlight the rationality of science as a source of orientation and legitimation for change processes, and that are responsive to the needs of all citizens.
本文旨在阐明公民对反科学阴谋论(如 "癌症的治疗方法是存在的,但被商业利益所掩盖")的反应。基于欧洲晴雨表 95.2(2021 年春季,38 个国家),我们研究了公众对反科学阴谋论的反对或支持与个人和国家层面变量的关系。各国在反对或支持方面存在巨大差异。在控制人为因素的情况下,个人层面的变量显示出与科学特定变量的关联,例如,知识、偏好的交流渠道、对科学家的社会评价、对疫苗的态度以及更普遍的政治(不)满意度。在国家层面,富裕程度和妇女代表比例是描述这些差异的有用指标。结论是,如果政策能够强调科学的合理性,将其作为变革进程的方向和合法性的来源,并且能够满足所有公民的需求,那么就可以避免阴谋论反科学信仰的消极影响。
{"title":"Citizens and conspiratorial anti-science beliefs: Opposition versus support in 38 countries across Europe","authors":"Joop de Boer, Harry Aiking","doi":"10.1177/09636625241245371","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241245371","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to clarify citizens’ responses to conspiratorial anti-science beliefs (e.g. “The cure for cancer exists but is hidden from the public by commercial interests”). Based on Eurobarometer 95.2 (Spring 2021, 38 countries), we examine how public opposition or support for conspiratorial anti-science beliefs is related to individual- and country-level variables. There were large differences between the countries in their opposition or support. Controlling for artifacts, the individual-level variables showed associations with science-specific variables, for example, knowledge, preferred communication sources, social evaluations of scientists, attitude toward vaccines, and more general political (dis)satisfaction. At the country level, Affluence and Women’s representation were useful indicators for describing these differences. The conclusion is that the negativity of conspiratorial anti-science beliefs can be avoided by policies that highlight the rationality of science as a source of orientation and legitimation for change processes, and that are responsive to the needs of all citizens.","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140617519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Science on the mind: Examining question ordering effects when asking about science on large-scale surveys 心中的科学在大规模调查中询问科学问题时检验问题排序效应
IF 4.1 2区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.1177/09636625241237748
Cameron D. Mackey, Kimberly Rios, Christopher P. Scheitle, Katie E. Corcoran, Bernard D. DiGregorio
Previous research has examined people’s attitudes toward science and scientists, highlighting how religious identities, beliefs, or behavior shapes these attitudes. However, survey design choices have been previously shown to influence individuals’ attitudes toward religion and science. We investigated the extent to which question ordering (i.e. presenting questions about science before questions about religion or the paranormal) in a large-scale survey would influence respondents’ attitudes toward science and religion. Utilizing an experimental design, we found that responding to science questions first led to (1) more interest in science, (2) more confidence in the scientific community, (3) increased agreement that science is a way of knowing truth, (4) more confidence in responding to science knowledge items, (5) more agreement to scientific statements, and (6) more trust in scientists. We discuss the implications of question ordering when analyzing attitudes toward science and religion within the same surveys and future directions for research.
以往的研究考察了人们对科学和科学家的态度,强调了宗教身份、信仰或行为是如何影响这些态度的。然而,调查设计的选择以前也被证明会影响个人对宗教和科学的态度。我们研究了在大规模调查中,问题排序(即先提出有关科学的问题,再提出有关宗教或超自然现象的问题)会在多大程度上影响受访者对科学和宗教的态度。通过实验设计,我们发现首先回答科学问题会导致:(1)对科学更感兴趣;(2)对科学界更有信心;(3)更认同科学是认识真理的一种方式;(4)更有信心回答科学知识项目;(5)更认同科学声明;(6)更信任科学家。我们讨论了在同一调查中分析对科学和宗教的态度时问题排序的影响以及未来的研究方向。
{"title":"Science on the mind: Examining question ordering effects when asking about science on large-scale surveys","authors":"Cameron D. Mackey, Kimberly Rios, Christopher P. Scheitle, Katie E. Corcoran, Bernard D. DiGregorio","doi":"10.1177/09636625241237748","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241237748","url":null,"abstract":"Previous research has examined people’s attitudes toward science and scientists, highlighting how religious identities, beliefs, or behavior shapes these attitudes. However, survey design choices have been previously shown to influence individuals’ attitudes toward religion and science. We investigated the extent to which question ordering (i.e. presenting questions about science before questions about religion or the paranormal) in a large-scale survey would influence respondents’ attitudes toward science and religion. Utilizing an experimental design, we found that responding to science questions first led to (1) more interest in science, (2) more confidence in the scientific community, (3) increased agreement that science is a way of knowing truth, (4) more confidence in responding to science knowledge items, (5) more agreement to scientific statements, and (6) more trust in scientists. We discuss the implications of question ordering when analyzing attitudes toward science and religion within the same surveys and future directions for research.","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140577549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fuelling the climate and science 'denial machine' on social media: A case study of the Great Barrier Reef's 2021 'in danger' recommendation on Twitter, YouTube and Facebook. 社交媒体上的气候和科学“否认机器”火上浇油:推特、YouTube和脸书上对大堡礁2021年“危险”建议的案例研究。
IF 4.1 2区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-26 DOI: 10.1177/09636625231202117
Carly Lubicz-Zaorski, Maxine Newlands, Theresa Petray

Australian climate policy has been stifled by a network of free-market and extractive industry-advocating actors, yet there is little empirical evidence to show how these actors and information flows behave in online communication spaces during Australian environmental conflicts. Focusing on the UNESCO 2021 'in danger' recommendation for the Great Barrier Reef for 6 weeks, this mixed-methods study of Twitter, Facebook and YouTube uses social network analysis, including cluster analysis and in-depth close reading. We find that a small, yet significant, mix of ideologically aligned partisan actors are fuelling the 'denial machine' in Australia by co-opting a scientific report's findings to argue that the Great Barrier Reef has recovered, and to contest the need for climate action. This article offers insights into the central actors and tactics that could erode public support for Australian climate policy, with similarities to strategies already established in the United States. It also contributes to furthering multi-platform analyses.

澳大利亚的气候政策被自由市场和采掘业倡导者网络所扼杀,但几乎没有实证证据表明这些参与者和信息流在澳大利亚环境冲突期间在在线交流空间中的行为。这项针对推特、脸书和YouTube的混合方法研究围绕联合国教科文组织2021年大堡礁“危险”建议进行了为期6周的研究,使用了社交网络分析,包括聚类分析和深入细读。我们发现,少数但重要的意识形态一致的党派行为者正在助长澳大利亚的“否认机器”,他们选择了一份科学报告的发现来证明大堡礁已经恢复,并质疑采取气候行动的必要性。这篇文章深入了解了可能削弱公众对澳大利亚气候政策支持的核心参与者和策略,与美国已经制定的策略相似。它也有助于推进多平台分析。
{"title":"Fuelling the climate and science 'denial machine' on social media: A case study of the Great Barrier Reef's 2021 'in danger' recommendation on Twitter, YouTube and Facebook.","authors":"Carly Lubicz-Zaorski, Maxine Newlands, Theresa Petray","doi":"10.1177/09636625231202117","DOIUrl":"10.1177/09636625231202117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Australian climate policy has been stifled by a network of free-market and extractive industry-advocating actors, yet there is little empirical evidence to show how these actors and information flows behave in online communication spaces during Australian environmental conflicts. Focusing on the UNESCO 2021 'in danger' recommendation for the Great Barrier Reef for 6 weeks, this mixed-methods study of Twitter, Facebook and YouTube uses social network analysis, including cluster analysis and in-depth close reading. We find that a small, yet significant, mix of ideologically aligned partisan actors are fuelling the 'denial machine' in Australia by co-opting a scientific report's findings to argue that the Great Barrier Reef has recovered, and to contest the need for climate action. This article offers insights into the central actors and tactics that could erode public support for Australian climate policy, with similarities to strategies already established in the United States. It also contributes to furthering multi-platform analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10958753/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50163259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Science museum educators' views on object-based learning: The perceived importance of authenticity and touch. 科学博物馆教育工作者对基于对象的学习的看法:真实性和触觉的重要性。
IF 4.1 2区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-02 DOI: 10.1177/09636625231202617
Tirsa de Kluis, Sanne Romp, Anne M Land-Zandstra

Museum educators play an important role in mediating visitors' museum experiences. We investigated the perspectives of science museum educators on the role of touching authentic objects and replicas in visitors' learning experiences during educational activities. We used a mixed-methods approach including surveys with 49 museum educators and interviews with 12 museum educators from several countries in Europe. Our findings indicate the importance of context when presenting museum visitors with objects. Participating museum educators based their choices for including authentic objects or replicas in educational activities more often on narrative and context than on the authenticity status of an object. In addition, educators used various definitions of authenticity, which may hinder the discussion about the topic within the field.

博物馆教育工作者在调解游客的博物馆体验方面发挥着重要作用。我们调查了科学博物馆教育工作者对在教育活动中触摸真品和复制品在游客学习体验中的作用的看法。我们采用了混合方法,包括对49名博物馆教育工作者的调查和对来自欧洲几个国家的12名博物馆教育者的采访。我们的研究结果表明,在向博物馆游客展示物品时,背景的重要性。参与的博物馆教育工作者在选择将真品或复制品纳入教育活动时,更多的是基于叙事和背景,而不是基于物品的真实性状况。此外,教育工作者对真实性使用了各种定义,这可能会阻碍该领域内对该主题的讨论。
{"title":"Science museum educators' views on object-based learning: The perceived importance of authenticity and touch.","authors":"Tirsa de Kluis, Sanne Romp, Anne M Land-Zandstra","doi":"10.1177/09636625231202617","DOIUrl":"10.1177/09636625231202617","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Museum educators play an important role in mediating visitors' museum experiences. We investigated the perspectives of science museum educators on the role of touching authentic objects and replicas in visitors' learning experiences during educational activities. We used a mixed-methods approach including surveys with 49 museum educators and interviews with 12 museum educators from several countries in Europe. Our findings indicate the importance of context when presenting museum visitors with objects. Participating museum educators based their choices for including authentic objects or replicas in educational activities more often on narrative and context than on the authenticity status of an object. In addition, educators used various definitions of authenticity, which may hinder the discussion about the topic within the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10958754/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71427969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
1796 - An Introduction to Botany: The critical role of women in eighteenth-century science popularisation and the early promotion of science for young girls in Britain. 1796 - 《植物学入门》:妇女在十八世纪科学普及中的关键作用,以及英国早期对年轻女孩的科学推广。
IF 4.1 2区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-14 DOI: 10.1177/09636625231217015
Isabel Richards
{"title":"1796 - <i>An Introduction to Botany</i>: The critical role of women in eighteenth-century science popularisation and the early promotion of science for young girls in Britain.","authors":"Isabel Richards","doi":"10.1177/09636625231217015","DOIUrl":"10.1177/09636625231217015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10958745/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138812352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Work and the public understanding of science. 工作和公众对科学的理解。
IF 4.1 2区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-21 DOI: 10.1177/09636625231203478
Robert M Kunovich

This study examines whether engaging in science work and work that is substantively complex (e.g. requiring independent thought and judgment) is related to interest in science, science knowledge, and confidence in the scientific community in the United States. It also examines whether the conditions of work mediate the relationship between education and these science-related outcomes. Occupation-level data from O*NET are merged with survey data from the General Social Survey. Results indicate that science work is related to interest in science and science knowledge and that work complexity is related to confidence in the scientific community. Results offer only limited evidence of mediation-science work mediates the relationship between educational attainment and science knowledge but not the relationships involving interest or confidence. In sum, results indicate that the conditions of work are associated with science attitudes, and that researchers should examine these connections in future research.

这项研究考察了从事科学工作和实质上复杂的工作(例如需要独立思考和判断)是否与对科学的兴趣、科学知识和对美国科学界的信心有关。它还考察了工作条件是否调节了教育和这些与科学相关的结果之间的关系。O*NET的职业水平数据与综合社会调查的调查数据合并。结果表明,科学工作与对科学和科学知识的兴趣有关,工作复杂性与对科学界的信心有关。研究结果仅提供了有限的中介证据,科学工作中介了教育程度和科学知识之间的关系,但没有中介涉及兴趣或信心的关系。总之,研究结果表明,工作条件与科学态度有关,研究人员应该在未来的研究中检验这些联系。
{"title":"Work and the public understanding of science.","authors":"Robert M Kunovich","doi":"10.1177/09636625231203478","DOIUrl":"10.1177/09636625231203478","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines whether engaging in science work and work that is substantively complex (e.g. requiring independent thought and judgment) is related to interest in science, science knowledge, and confidence in the scientific community in the United States. It also examines whether the conditions of work mediate the relationship between education and these science-related outcomes. Occupation-level data from O*NET are merged with survey data from the General Social Survey. Results indicate that science work is related to interest in science and science knowledge and that work complexity is related to confidence in the scientific community. Results offer only limited evidence of mediation-science work mediates the relationship between educational attainment and science knowledge but not the relationships involving interest or confidence. In sum, results indicate that the conditions of work are associated with science attitudes, and that researchers should examine these connections in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10958755/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49683639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Public Understanding of Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1