首页 > 最新文献

Educational Research Review最新文献

英文 中文
Establishing a dynamic understanding of factors that influence university students’ leadership approaches, perceptions, and skills through a systematic literature review 通过系统的文献综述,建立对影响大学生领导方法、观念和技能的因素的动态理解
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100570
Katherine K.W. Lee, Cecilia K.Y. Chan

Leadership skills are an important area of students’ development and a key learning outcome of their university education. This systematic review aims to identify, summarise, and map out the various factors that influence university students’ leadership approaches, perceptions, and beliefs, in order to establish a more comprehensive understanding of how development in these areas can be better targeted and nurtured. Drawing on 54 empirical journal articles identified in the search stage, two main themes were identified: student-centric attributes, and environmental and contextual elements. Ranging from students’ internal self-beliefs to their immediate social situations and wider sociocultural conventions, findings from this review reveal a dynamic set of different factors that interact with one another. The findings of this review raise important implications for efforts targeting students’ leadership skills development, including the need to cultivate students’ sense of leadership self-efficacy and raise awareness of harmful social stereotypes.

领导能力是学生发展的一个重要领域,也是大学教育的一个重要学习成果。本系统综述旨在识别、总结和绘制出影响大学生领导方法、观念和信念的各种因素,以便更全面地了解如何更好地定位和培养这些领域的发展。根据在搜索阶段确定的54篇实证期刊文章,确定了两个主要主题:以学生为中心的属性,以及环境和上下文因素。从学生的内在自我信念到他们当下的社会情境和更广泛的社会文化习俗,这一综述的发现揭示了一系列相互作用的动态不同因素。本研究的结果对学生领导技能的发展提出了重要的启示,包括培养学生的领导自我效能感和提高对有害社会刻板印象的认识。
{"title":"Establishing a dynamic understanding of factors that influence university students’ leadership approaches, perceptions, and skills through a systematic literature review","authors":"Katherine K.W. Lee,&nbsp;Cecilia K.Y. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100570","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100570","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Leadership skills are an important area of students’ development and a key learning outcome of their university education. This systematic review aims to identify, summarise, and map out the various factors that influence university students’ leadership approaches, perceptions, and beliefs, in order to establish a more comprehensive understanding of how development in these areas can be better targeted and nurtured. Drawing on 54 empirical journal articles identified in the search stage, two main themes were identified: student-centric attributes, and environmental and contextual elements. Ranging from students’ internal self-beliefs to their immediate social situations and wider sociocultural conventions, findings from this review reveal a dynamic set of different factors that interact with one another. The findings of this review raise important implications for efforts targeting students’ leadership skills development, including the need to cultivate students’ sense of leadership self-efficacy and raise awareness of harmful social stereotypes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100570"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138297704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The instructor presence effect and its moderators in instructional video: A series of meta-analyses 教学视频中的教师在场效应及其调节因素:一系列元分析
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100564
Maik Beege , Noah L. Schroeder , Steffi Heidig , Günter Daniel Rey , Sascha Schneider

Researchers disagree on the extent to which social cues in instructional videos influence learning and learning-relevant outcomes and processes. The instructor presence effect states that visible instructors in instructional videos lead to increased social presence and higher scores in subjective ratings like motivation, social presence, or affect, but do not improve learning outcomes. In contrast, the Cognitive-Affective-Social Theory of Learning in digital Environments outlines how social cues not only enhance social, emotional, and motivational processes, but they also potentially promote learning outcomes. We conducted a series of meta-analyses to explore the effects of instructor presence in instructional videos on retention, transfer, social presence, motivation, cognitive load, affect, and visual dwell time. The meta-analyses include 35 studies, which contained 46 pair-wise comparisons and 6339 participants. Results revealed a small, statistically significant positive effect of including a visual instructor on retention outcomes, but no significant effect on transfer performance. A visible instructor also significantly enhanced social presence, affective, and motivational ratings. Furthermore, we found that a visible instructor significantly reduced dwell time on relevant visual material but also reduced subjective perception of extraneous cognitive load. Significant moderator effects could be found regarding prior knowledge, the instructional domain as well as the size of the instructor.

研究人员对教学视频中的社会线索在多大程度上影响学习和学习相关的结果和过程存在分歧。导师在场效应表明,教学视频中可见的导师会增加社交在场感,并在动机、社交在场感或情感等主观评级中获得更高的分数,但不会改善学习结果。相比之下,数字环境中学习的认知-情感-社会理论概述了社会线索如何不仅增强社会、情感和动机过程,而且可能促进学习结果。我们进行了一系列元分析,以探索教学视频中教师在场对保留、转移、社交在场、动机、认知负荷、影响和视觉停留时间的影响。荟萃分析包括35项研究,其中包括46项配对比较和6339名参与者。结果显示,包括视觉教练对保留结果的积极影响很小,具有统计学意义,但对转移表现没有显著影响。一个可见的教练也显著提高了社会存在感、情感和动机评分。此外,我们发现,可视教练显著减少了对相关视觉材料的停留时间,但也减少了对外部认知负荷的主观感知。在先验知识、教学领域以及教师规模方面可以发现显著的调节效应。
{"title":"The instructor presence effect and its moderators in instructional video: A series of meta-analyses","authors":"Maik Beege ,&nbsp;Noah L. Schroeder ,&nbsp;Steffi Heidig ,&nbsp;Günter Daniel Rey ,&nbsp;Sascha Schneider","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100564","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100564","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Researchers disagree on the extent to which social cues in instructional videos influence learning and learning-relevant outcomes and processes. The instructor presence effect states that visible instructors in instructional videos lead to increased social presence and higher scores in subjective ratings like motivation, social presence, or affect, but do not improve learning outcomes. In contrast, the Cognitive-Affective-Social Theory of Learning in digital Environments outlines how social cues not only enhance social, emotional, and motivational processes, but they also potentially promote learning outcomes. We conducted a series of meta-analyses to explore the effects of instructor presence in instructional videos on retention, transfer, social presence, motivation, cognitive load, affect, and visual dwell time. The meta-analyses include 35 studies, which contained 46 pair-wise comparisons and 6339 participants. Results revealed a small, statistically significant positive effect of including a visual instructor on retention outcomes, but no significant effect on transfer performance. A visible instructor also significantly enhanced social presence, affective, and motivational ratings. Furthermore, we found that a visible instructor significantly reduced dwell time on relevant visual material but also reduced subjective perception of extraneous cognitive load. Significant moderator effects could be found regarding prior knowledge, the instructional domain as well as the size of the instructor.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100564"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X2300057X/pdfft?md5=ca6ecd608f5ce1da63d802a9438968cd&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X2300057X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71511194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prerequisites for teachers’ technology use in formative assessment practices: A systematic review 教师在形成性评估实践中使用技术的先决条件:系统回顾
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100568
Kristin Børte , Sølvi Lillejord , Jessica Chan , Barbara Wasson , Samuel Greiff

While researchers promote the interactive learning potential of digital tools, studies reveal that teachers adapt technology to existing practice instead of using the tools' potential for student active learning. Researchers also argue that formative assessment enhances students' learning, while studies find formative assessment difficult to implement. To investigate these paradoxes and better understand how teachers use digital tools in formative assessment and with what result, we conducted a systematic review of teachers' technology use in formative assessment practices in primary and secondary education. Systematic searches identified 22 relevant articles that are included in the review. We found unclear definitions of formative assessment across studies and document challenges teachers encounter when they use technology for formative assessment purposes. We conclude with three prerequisites for teachers' successful technology use in formative assessment practices: 1) clear definitions of formative assessment, 2) alignment between digital tools and pedagogical practice, and 3) data literacy to examine and interpret information and use this to improve students’ learning. The review also documents knowledge gaps in current research.

虽然研究人员提倡数字工具的互动学习潜力,但研究表明,教师使技术适应现有的实践,而不是利用工具的潜力来促进学生的主动学习。研究者也认为形成性评价能促进学生的学习,然而研究发现形成性评价难以实施。为了调查这些矛盾并更好地理解教师如何在形成性评估中使用数字工具以及产生了什么结果,我们对教师在中小学教育形成性评估实践中使用技术进行了系统回顾。系统检索确定了综述中包含的22篇相关文章。我们发现研究中形成性评估的定义不明确,教师在使用技术进行形成性评估时遇到的文件挑战。我们总结了教师在形成性评估实践中成功使用技术的三个先决条件:1)形成性评估的明确定义,2)数字工具与教学实践之间的一致性,以及3)检查和解释信息并使用它来改善学生学习的数据素养。该综述还记录了当前研究中的知识缺口。
{"title":"Prerequisites for teachers’ technology use in formative assessment practices: A systematic review","authors":"Kristin Børte ,&nbsp;Sølvi Lillejord ,&nbsp;Jessica Chan ,&nbsp;Barbara Wasson ,&nbsp;Samuel Greiff","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100568","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100568","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While researchers promote the interactive learning potential of digital tools, studies reveal that teachers adapt technology to existing practice instead of using the tools' potential for student active learning. Researchers also argue that formative assessment enhances students' learning, while studies find formative assessment difficult to implement. To investigate these paradoxes and better understand how teachers use digital tools in formative assessment and with what result, we conducted a systematic review of teachers' technology use in formative assessment practices in primary and secondary education. Systematic searches identified 22 relevant articles that are included in the review. We found unclear definitions of formative assessment across studies and document challenges teachers encounter when they use technology for formative assessment purposes. We conclude with three prerequisites for teachers' successful technology use in formative assessment practices: 1) clear definitions of formative assessment, 2) alignment between digital tools and pedagogical practice, and 3) data literacy to examine and interpret information and use this to improve students’ learning. The review also documents knowledge gaps in current research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100568"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X23000611/pdfft?md5=04acfa9dd7d6d20a9ae340815680ca5f&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X23000611-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72365727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of functional literacy interventions for adults 成人功能性读写干预有效性的荟萃分析
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100569
Juliane Kindl, Wolfgang Lenhard

A significant portion of the working-age population has only rudimentary literacy skills. Many people who are functionally illiterate have problems to perform basic daily tasks and to participate in society. Given the paucity of research, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of adult literacy interventions using a three-level meta-regression analysis, controlling for potential moderators of effectiveness. The literature search included empirical studies with a control group design in English, French, German, Portuguese, and Spanish. 39 controlled primary studies met the inclusion criteria, including 236 effect sizes. There was a small but significant main effect on participants' literacy level (g = 0.22). Interventions with a lower frequency of weekly sessions were more effective than more intensive approaches. No significant effect on effectiveness was found for total duration, context, language of instruction, teacher-student ratio, computer use, or initial literacy level of participants. As a large proportion of the primary studies were found to be at high risk of bias, more reliable primary studies are needed to support the findings and provide a more nuanced view of the effectiveness of interventions. Nevertheless, this review provides promising evidence that adults with low literacy skills can benefit from literacy interventions.

相当一部分适龄劳动人口只有基本的识字能力。许多功能性文盲在执行基本的日常任务和参与社会方面存在问题。鉴于研究的缺乏,本研究的目的是利用三水平元回归分析来评估成人识字干预的效果,控制潜在的效果调节因子。文献检索包括以英语、法语、德语、葡萄牙语和西班牙语为对照设计的实证研究。39项对照初级研究符合纳入标准,包括236个效应量。受试者的识字水平有小而显著的主效应(g = 0.22)。每周治疗频率较低的干预措施比更密集的方法更有效。总体持续时间、教学环境、教学语言、师生比例、计算机使用情况或参与者的初始识字水平对有效性没有显著影响。由于大部分初步研究被发现存在高偏倚风险,因此需要更可靠的初步研究来支持这些发现,并对干预措施的有效性提供更细致入微的看法。然而,这篇综述提供了有希望的证据,表明读写能力低的成年人可以从读写干预中受益。
{"title":"A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of functional literacy interventions for adults","authors":"Juliane Kindl,&nbsp;Wolfgang Lenhard","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100569","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100569","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>A significant portion of the working-age population has only rudimentary literacy skills. Many people who are functionally illiterate have problems to perform basic daily tasks and to participate in society. Given the paucity of research, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of adult literacy interventions using a three-level meta-regression analysis, controlling for potential moderators of effectiveness. The literature search included empirical studies with a control group design in English, French, German, Portuguese, and Spanish. 39 controlled primary studies met the inclusion criteria, including 236 effect sizes. There was a small but significant main effect on participants' literacy level (</span><em>g</em><span> = 0.22). Interventions with a lower frequency of weekly sessions were more effective than more intensive approaches. No significant effect on effectiveness was found for total duration, context, language of instruction, teacher-student ratio, computer use, or initial literacy level of participants. As a large proportion of the primary studies were found to be at high risk of bias, more reliable primary studies are needed to support the findings and provide a more nuanced view of the effectiveness of interventions. Nevertheless, this review provides promising evidence that adults with low literacy skills can benefit from literacy interventions.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100569"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72365824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What makes peer collaborative problem solving productive or unproductive: A qualitative systematic review 是什么让同伴协作解决问题富有成效或毫无成效:一个定性的系统回顾
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100567
Aleksandar Baucal , Smiljana Jošić , Ivana Stepanović Ilić , Marina Videnović , Jovan Ivanović , Ksenija Krstić

Global demands for collaborative problem solving (CPS) have sparked investigations of peer collaboration in the educational context. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and systematize research findings on (a) characteristics of productive and unproductive face-to-face (f2f) or synchronous CPS via digital devices among adolescents in the educational context, (b) training and scaffolding modalities enabling adolescents to engage in productive CPS, and (c) ways of supporting productive CPS by using digital resources. We conducted a thematic analysis of 160 selected papers from a larger corpus and identified six main themes, that is, groups of characteristics of CPS: socio-cognitive aspects; socio-emotional aspects; the quality of task/problem-solving strategies; regulation of group activity oriented towards the task; regulation of group activity oriented towards group members; and participant engagement in CPS. We found that in efforts to contribute to successful CPS, adults (teachers/researchers) can moderate peer interaction in three ways, by focusing on either cognitive processes, group discussions, or classroom management. Regarding the third goal, we identified two major roles of digital resources in adolescent CPS. The first role pertained to ICT as a source of relevant knowledge or a tool for problem solving and the other role was related to peer collaboration and ICT as a tool for scaffolding collaboration. All characteristics that emerged in this review are discussed and concluding comments refer to educational implications.

全球对协作解决问题(CPS)的需求引发了对教育背景下同伴协作的调查。本系统综述的目的是确定并系统化以下方面的研究成果:(a)在教育背景下通过数字设备在青少年中进行生产性和非生产性面对面(f2f)或同步CPS的特征,(b)使青少年能够参与生产性CPS的培训和脚手架模式,以及(c)通过使用数字资源支持生产性CPS的方法。我们从一个较大的语料库中选择了160篇论文进行了专题分析,并确定了六个主题,即CPS的特征组:社会认知方面;socio-emotional方面;任务/问题解决策略的质量;以任务为导向的群体活动调控以群体成员为中心的群体活动调控;以及参与CPS的程度。我们发现,在努力为成功的CPS做出贡献的过程中,成年人(教师/研究人员)可以通过三种方式调节同伴互动,通过关注认知过程,小组讨论或课堂管理。关于第三个目标,我们确定了数字资源在青少年CPS中的两个主要角色。第一个作用涉及信通技术作为相关知识的来源或解决问题的工具,另一个作用涉及对等协作和信通技术作为支架式协作的工具。本文讨论了本综述中出现的所有特征,结论性评论涉及教育意义。
{"title":"What makes peer collaborative problem solving productive or unproductive: A qualitative systematic review","authors":"Aleksandar Baucal ,&nbsp;Smiljana Jošić ,&nbsp;Ivana Stepanović Ilić ,&nbsp;Marina Videnović ,&nbsp;Jovan Ivanović ,&nbsp;Ksenija Krstić","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100567","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100567","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Global demands for collaborative problem solving (CPS) have sparked investigations of peer collaboration in the educational context. The aim of this </span>systematic review<span> was to identify and systematize research findings on (a) characteristics of productive and unproductive face-to-face (f2f) or synchronous CPS via digital devices among adolescents in the educational context, (b) training and scaffolding modalities enabling adolescents to engage in productive CPS, and (c) ways of supporting productive CPS by using digital resources. We conducted a thematic analysis of 160 selected papers from a larger corpus and identified six main themes, that is, groups of characteristics of CPS: socio-cognitive aspects; socio-emotional aspects; the quality of task/problem-solving strategies; regulation of group activity oriented towards the task; regulation of group activity oriented towards group members; and participant engagement in CPS. We found that in efforts to contribute to successful CPS, adults (teachers/researchers) can moderate peer interaction<span> in three ways, by focusing on either cognitive processes, group discussions, or classroom management. Regarding the third goal, we identified two major roles of digital resources in adolescent CPS. The first role pertained to ICT as a source of relevant knowledge or a tool for problem solving and the other role was related to peer collaboration and ICT as a tool for scaffolding collaboration. All characteristics that emerged in this review are discussed and concluding comments refer to educational implications.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100567"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138293432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conceptualizing mentoring in higher education: A systematic literature review 高等教育中师徒关系的概念化:系统文献综述
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100565
Wendy Nuis, Mien Segers, Simon Beausaert

Mentoring has nowadays become a prevalent educational practice in higher education, as it allows for personalized learning trajectories and competence-based education. However, the effectiveness of mentoring programs is difficult to measure due to a lack of conceptual clarity about the mentoring concept and the broad variety of measurements used. Therefore, a systematic literature review was conducted to conceptualize mentoring by looking at the definitions, characteristics, and measurements. A total of 106 studies were reviewed and a summative content analysis was applied. The results of this study are three-fold. First, a synthesis and integration of existing definitions resulted in a newly developed, holistic definition of mentoring. Second, evidence-based characteristics of mentoring are discussed that give insights into how to design and implement mentoring programs. Third, an overview of existing mentoring measures is presented, and a subsequent in-depth analysis shows their alignment with the proposed conceptualization on mentoring.

导师制已成为当今高等教育中普遍的教育实践,因为它允许个性化的学习轨迹和基于能力的教育。然而,师徒计划的有效性是难以衡量的,因为缺乏关于师徒概念的概念清晰度和广泛的测量方法。因此,进行了系统的文献回顾,通过查看定义、特征和度量来概念化指导。本文对106项研究进行了综述,并采用了总结性内容分析。这项研究的结果有三个方面。首先,对现有定义的综合和集成产生了一个新的、全面的指导定义。其次,讨论了师徒关系的循证特征,为如何设计和实施师徒关系提供了启示。第三,概述了现有的指导措施,随后的深入分析显示了它们与建议的指导概念化的一致性。
{"title":"Conceptualizing mentoring in higher education: A systematic literature review","authors":"Wendy Nuis,&nbsp;Mien Segers,&nbsp;Simon Beausaert","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100565","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100565","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mentoring has nowadays become a prevalent educational practice in higher education, as it allows for personalized learning trajectories and competence-based education. However, the effectiveness of mentoring programs is difficult to measure due to a lack of conceptual clarity about the mentoring concept and the broad variety of measurements used. Therefore, a systematic literature review was conducted to conceptualize mentoring by looking at the definitions, characteristics, and measurements. A total of 106 studies were reviewed and a summative content analysis was applied. The results of this study are three-fold. First, a synthesis and integration of existing definitions resulted in a newly developed, holistic definition of mentoring. Second, evidence-based characteristics of mentoring are discussed that give insights into how to design and implement mentoring programs. Third, an overview of existing mentoring measures is presented, and a subsequent in-depth analysis shows their alignment with the proposed conceptualization on mentoring.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100565"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X23000581/pdfft?md5=d0b16acdf4c3532bf74cb8cc3e1a0b42&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X23000581-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138293450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Academic underachievement and its motivational and self-regulated learning correlates: A meta-analytic review of 80 years of research 学业成绩不佳与自我概念、动机和自我调节因素:80年研究的元分析综述
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100566
Carlton J. Fong , Erika A. Patall , Kate E. Snyder , Meagan A. Hoff , Sara J. Jones , Robin E. Zuniga-Ortega

Academic underachievement, the discrepancy between students' academic potential and performance, remains both an educational problem and a mystery after nearly a century of research. Of enduring interest has been identifying factors behind underachievement, one of which relates to students’ motivation and self-regulated learning. To explore the state of known research, we conducted a systematic and meta-analytic review of the past 80 years of empirical research comparing underachieving and non-underachieving students on various motivational and self-regulated learning correlates. Based on 1044 effect sizes from 125 studies (156 unique samples, N = 56,640 students), our overall meta-analytic findings suggested that underachieving students tend to have higher external locus of control (g = 0.30) and lower levels of competence beliefs (g = −0.48), autonomous motivation and task values (g = −0.48), self-regulated learning strategies (g = −0.59), and mastery goals (g = −0.39) relative to non-underachieving students. Differences in competence beliefs between underachieving and non-underachieving students were moderated by grade level and underachievement identification method. Implications for the theoretical bases for academic underachievement and the educational practices to reverse or prevent underachievement are discussed.

学业成绩不佳,即学生的学业潜力和学业表现之间的差距,在近一个世纪的研究之后,仍然是一个教育问题和谜。长久以来的兴趣一直是找出成绩不佳背后的因素,其中之一与学生的动机和自我调节学习有关。为了探索已知研究的现状,我们对过去80年的实证研究进行了系统和荟萃分析,比较了学习成绩不佳和非学习成绩不佳学生在各种动机和自我调节学习相关因素上的差异。基于1044效应大小从125年开始研究(156独特的样本,N = 56640名学生),我们的整体整合的研究结果表明,学习成绩不良的学生往往有更高的外部控制点(0.30 g = )和低水平的能力信念(g = −0.48),自主动机和任务值(g = −0.48),自主学习策略(g = −0.59),和掌握目标(g = −0.39)相对于non-underachieving学生。成绩差生与非成绩差生的能力信念差异受年级和成绩差生识别方法的调节。讨论了学业成绩不佳的理论基础和扭转或预防学业成绩不佳的教育实践的启示。
{"title":"Academic underachievement and its motivational and self-regulated learning correlates: A meta-analytic review of 80 years of research","authors":"Carlton J. Fong ,&nbsp;Erika A. Patall ,&nbsp;Kate E. Snyder ,&nbsp;Meagan A. Hoff ,&nbsp;Sara J. Jones ,&nbsp;Robin E. Zuniga-Ortega","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100566","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100566","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Academic underachievement, the discrepancy between students' academic potential and performance, remains both an educational problem and a mystery after nearly a century of research. Of enduring interest has been identifying factors behind underachievement, one of which relates to students’ motivation and self-regulated learning. To explore the state of known research, we conducted a systematic and meta-analytic review of the past 80 years of empirical research comparing underachieving and non-underachieving students on various motivational and self-regulated learning correlates. Based on 1044 effect sizes from 125 studies (156 unique samples, </span><em>N</em><span> = 56,640 students), our overall meta-analytic findings suggested that underachieving students tend to have higher external locus of control (</span><em>g</em> = 0.30) and lower levels of competence beliefs (<em>g</em><span> = −0.48), autonomous motivation and task values (</span><em>g</em> = −0.48), self-regulated learning strategies (<em>g</em> = −0.59), and mastery goals (<em>g</em> = −0.39) relative to non-underachieving students. Differences in competence beliefs between underachieving and non-underachieving students were moderated by grade level and underachievement identification method. Implications for the theoretical bases for academic underachievement and the educational practices to reverse or prevent underachievement are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100566"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72365731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thirty years of conceptual change research in biology – A review and meta-analysis of intervention studies 生物学概念变化研究三十年——干预研究综述和荟萃分析
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100556
Vesta Aleknavičiūtė , Erno Lehtinen , Ilona Södervik

As students learn biology at different levels of education, their tenacious and inaccurate prior conceptions pose a challenge to conceptual change. Educators and researchers have developed a variety of interventions to address these misinterpretations and promote the achievement of current scientific understanding. Despite an ever-growing body of literature, no study has been conducted to date that examines the quality of interventions or their effectiveness in terms of conceptual change. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies conducted in the field of biology in order to gain insight into this phenomenon. According to the results, evolution and photosynthesis are the most common topics investigated. Overall, the results of the meta-analysis indicate that conceptual change interventions result in large effects on conceptual understanding of biological topics when compared with traditional teaching, with refutational text being the most effective single type of intervention. However, the most effective interventions dealt with more simplified phenomena, such as the cardiovascular system of the human body. It was found that the effect sizes were strongly influenced by the number of participants in the samples, as well as publication bias. A striking number of the studies reported only superficial learning outcomes, such as knowledge enrichment rather than knowledge restructuring. It is possible to use the results of this study to inform instructional choices and to carry out further research.

当学生在不同的教育水平上学习生物学时,他们顽强而不准确的先验观念对观念的转变构成了挑战。教育工作者和研究人员已经制定了各种干预措施来解决这些误解,并促进实现当前的科学理解。尽管文献数量不断增加,但迄今为止,还没有进行任何研究来检验干预措施的质量或其在概念变化方面的有效性。为了深入了解这一现象,我们对生物学领域的干预研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。根据研究结果,进化和光合作用是最常见的研究主题。总体而言,荟萃分析的结果表明,与传统教学相比,概念改变干预对生物主题的概念理解产生了很大影响,反驳性文本是最有效的单一干预类型。然而,最有效的干预措施涉及更简单的现象,例如人体的心血管系统。研究发现,样本中参与者的数量以及发表偏倚对效应大小有很大影响。大量研究只报告了表面的学习结果,比如知识丰富而不是知识重组。利用这项研究的结果可以为教学选择提供信息,并进行进一步的研究。
{"title":"Thirty years of conceptual change research in biology – A review and meta-analysis of intervention studies","authors":"Vesta Aleknavičiūtė ,&nbsp;Erno Lehtinen ,&nbsp;Ilona Södervik","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100556","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100556","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As students learn biology at different levels of education, their tenacious and inaccurate prior conceptions pose a challenge to conceptual change. Educators and researchers have developed a variety of interventions to address these misinterpretations and promote the achievement of current scientific understanding. Despite an ever-growing body of literature, no study has been conducted to date that examines the quality of interventions or their effectiveness in terms of conceptual change. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies conducted in the field of biology in order to gain insight into this phenomenon. According to the results, evolution and photosynthesis are the most common topics investigated. Overall, the results of the meta-analysis indicate that conceptual change interventions result in large effects on conceptual understanding of biological topics when compared with traditional teaching, with refutational text being the most effective single type of intervention. However, the most effective interventions dealt with more simplified phenomena, such as the cardiovascular system of the human body. It was found that the effect sizes were strongly influenced by the number of participants in the samples, as well as publication bias. A striking number of the studies reported only superficial learning outcomes, such as knowledge enrichment rather than knowledge restructuring. It is possible to use the results of this study to inform instructional choices and to carry out further research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100556"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50165295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
How do physical or sensory early childhood education and care environment factors affect children's social and emotional development? A systematic scoping review 身体或感官的幼儿教育和护理环境因素如何影响儿童的社会和情感发展?系统的范围界定审查
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100555
Andrea Tamblyn , Yihan Sun , Tamara May , Maria Evangelou , Nicci Godsman , Claire Blewitt , Helen Skouteris

The aim of this systematic scoping review was to provide an overview of the physical and sensory environment factors that are related to three to six-year-old children's social and emotional development in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) settings across different pedagogical contexts. A systematic literature search was conducted in PsycINFO, Medline and ERIC. 8378 studies were screened from 2000 to 2021. A total of 589 studies were screened at full text stage, and 20 studies were included. Eleven studies reported a physical environment factor, and one study reported a sensory environment factor that was related to children's positive social and emotional competence outcomes. Eight studies reported a physical environment factor, and three studies reported a sensory environment factor that was negatively related to a social and emotional competence outcome. Three studies reported on long-term developmental implications provided by the ECEC environment. The physical and sensory environment overlaps with the social context in which it is embedded to contribute to children's early education experiences. Future research is needed to define optimal environmental conditions and embed physical and sensory environment research in social and emotional development programs.

这项系统的范围界定审查的目的是概述在不同的教学背景下,与三至六岁儿童在幼儿教育和护理(ECEC)环境中的社会和情感发展相关的物理和感官环境因素。在PsycINFO、Medline和ERIC进行了系统的文献检索。从2000年到2021年,共筛选了8378项研究。全文阶段共筛选了589项研究,包括20项研究。11项研究报告了一个物理环境因素,一项研究报告的感觉环境因素与儿童积极的社会和情感能力结果有关。八项研究报告了物理环境因素,三项研究报告的感觉环境因素与社会和情感能力结果呈负相关。三项研究报告了欧共体环境对长期发展的影响。物理和感官环境与社会环境重叠,在社会环境中,它有助于儿童的早期教育体验。未来的研究需要确定最佳环境条件,并将物理和感官环境研究纳入社会和情感发展计划。
{"title":"How do physical or sensory early childhood education and care environment factors affect children's social and emotional development? A systematic scoping review","authors":"Andrea Tamblyn ,&nbsp;Yihan Sun ,&nbsp;Tamara May ,&nbsp;Maria Evangelou ,&nbsp;Nicci Godsman ,&nbsp;Claire Blewitt ,&nbsp;Helen Skouteris","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100555","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100555","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this systematic scoping review was to provide an overview of the physical and sensory environment factors that are related to three to six-year-old children's social and emotional development in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) settings across different pedagogical contexts. A systematic literature search was conducted in PsycINFO, Medline and ERIC. 8378 studies were screened from 2000 to 2021. A total of 589 studies were screened at full text stage, and 20 studies were included. Eleven studies reported a physical environment factor, and one study reported a sensory environment factor that was related to children's positive social and emotional competence outcomes. Eight studies reported a physical environment factor, and three studies reported a sensory environment factor that was negatively related to a social and emotional competence outcome. Three studies reported on long-term developmental implications provided by the ECEC environment. The physical and sensory environment overlaps with the social context in which it is embedded to contribute to children's early education experiences. Future research is needed to define optimal environmental conditions and embed physical and sensory environment research in social and emotional development programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100555"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50165308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Students’ feedback seeking behaviour in undegraduate education: A scoping review 本科教育中学生的反馈寻求行为:一个范围审查
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100549
Martijn J.M. Leenknecht, David Carless

Feedback seeking in the organisational field has attracted sustained attention but seems relatively under-exploited in higher education. This scoping review aims to synthesize empirical research on feedback seeking in undergraduate education to develop a comprehensive understanding of students’ feedback seeking strategies and motivations, and related antecedents and outcomes. The method involved consultations with an expert panel, and a scoping review of 42 studies identified through rigorous search procedures. The key findings discuss learning enhancement, impression management and ego-based motives for feedback seeking; direct inquiry, indirect inquiry and monitoring strategies; and potential for feedback seeking outcomes to relate to high achievement. Broader implications focus on the interdependence between feedback seeking and feedback literacy; and the potential for cross-fertilisation of insights between research in organisations, medical education and broader higher education. Implications for practice focus on training and supporting student feedback seeking within psychologically safe learning environments.

组织领域的反馈寻求吸引了持续的关注,但在高等教育领域似乎相对未得到充分利用。本研究旨在综合本科教育中反馈寻求的实证研究,以全面了解学生的反馈寻求策略和动机,以及相关的前因和结果。该方法包括与专家小组协商,并通过严格的搜索程序对42项研究进行范围审查。主要研究结果讨论了学习增强、印象管理和反馈寻求的自我动机;直接查询、间接查询及监控策略;以及寻求与高成就相关的反馈结果的潜力。更广泛的影响集中在反馈寻求和反馈素养之间的相互依存;以及组织研究、医学教育和更广泛的高等教育之间的见解交叉融合的潜力。对实践的启示侧重于训练和支持学生在心理安全的学习环境中寻求反馈。
{"title":"Students’ feedback seeking behaviour in undegraduate education: A scoping review","authors":"Martijn J.M. Leenknecht, David Carless","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100549","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100549","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Feedback seeking in the organisational field has attracted sustained attention but seems relatively under-exploited in higher education. This scoping review aims to synthesize empirical research on feedback seeking in undergraduate education to develop a comprehensive understanding of students’ feedback seeking strategies and motivations, and related antecedents and outcomes. The method involved consultations with an expert panel, and a scoping review of 42 studies identified through rigorous search procedures. The key findings discuss learning enhancement, impression management and ego-based motives for feedback seeking; direct inquiry, indirect inquiry and monitoring strategies; and potential for feedback seeking outcomes to relate to high achievement. Broader implications focus on the interdependence between feedback seeking and feedback literacy; and the potential for cross-fertilisation of insights between research in organisations, medical education and broader higher education. Implications for practice focus on training and supporting student feedback seeking within psychologically safe learning environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"22 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50165518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Educational Research Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1