首页 > 最新文献

Educational Research Review最新文献

英文 中文
School-based teaching for democracy: A systematic review of teaching methods in quantitative intervention studies 基于学校的民主教学:定量干预研究中教学方法的系统回顾
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100511
Jip Y. Teegelbeckers , Hessel Nieuwelink , Ron J. Oostdam

Effective teaching for democracy requires an understanding of the teaching methods and educational characteristics that are effective in interventions. In order to address this requirement, we conducted a systematic literature review. We used an extensive search syntax and snowballing method that allowed us to find n = 2093 unique publications. After a screening process, we have included 54 interventions in 51 different quantitative effect studies written between 2010 and 2020. We categorized these interventions into five types of teaching methods: instruction, small-group work, assignments, projects, and democratic decision-making. We analyzed what the educational characteristics (i.e., subject matter, classroom interaction, classroom management) of these interventions were and for which democratic competences (i.e., knowledge, attitude, skill, behavior) they were effective. Our results show that teaching methods have differential effects on democratic competences. We also discuss the robustness of these results. Our study shows that there is still much to be gained in terms of research designs, the conceptualization of democratic competences, and the description of teaching methods.

有效的民主教学需要了解有效干预的教学方法和教育特征。为了满足这一要求,我们进行了系统的文献综述。我们使用了广泛的搜索语法和滚雪球方法,使我们能够找到n=2093个独特的出版物。经过筛选,我们在2010年至2020年间撰写的51项不同的定量效果研究中纳入了54项干预措施。我们将这些干预措施分为五种类型的教学方法:指导、小组作业、作业、项目和民主决策。我们分析了这些干预措施的教育特征(即主题、课堂互动、课堂管理),以及它们对哪些民主能力(即知识、态度、技能、行为)有效。我们的研究结果表明,教学方法对民主能力有不同的影响。我们还讨论了这些结果的稳健性。我们的研究表明,在研究设计、民主能力的概念化和教学方法的描述方面仍有很多收获。
{"title":"School-based teaching for democracy: A systematic review of teaching methods in quantitative intervention studies","authors":"Jip Y. Teegelbeckers ,&nbsp;Hessel Nieuwelink ,&nbsp;Ron J. Oostdam","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100511","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100511","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Effective teaching for democracy requires an understanding of the teaching methods and educational characteristics that are effective in interventions. In order to address this requirement, we conducted a systematic literature review. We used an extensive search syntax and snowballing method that allowed us to find <em>n</em> = 2093 unique publications. After a screening process, we have included 54 interventions in 51 different quantitative effect studies written between 2010 and 2020. We categorized these interventions into five types of teaching methods: instruction, small-group work, assignments, projects, and democratic decision-making. We analyzed what the educational characteristics (i.e., subject matter, classroom interaction, classroom management) of these interventions were and for which democratic competences (i.e., knowledge, attitude, skill, behavior) they were effective. Our results show that teaching methods have differential effects on democratic competences. We also discuss the robustness of these results. Our study shows that there is still much to be gained in terms of research designs, the conceptualization of democratic competences, and the description of teaching methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100511"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Or is that just your opinion?“: Incorporating faculty of color into the foundational literature on learner-centered classrooms—A review “或者这只是你的观点吗?”:将有色人种纳入以学习者为中心的课堂基础文献——综述
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100512
Derisa Grant

Learner-centered classrooms are cooperative learning spaces in which instructors intentionally incorporate the needs, experiences, and feedback of students in order to design course objectives, materials, and assessments. This paper is concerned with the question: To what extent does the literature on learner-centered classrooms address the unique teaching challenges of faculty of color in higher education? Through a review of the foundational literature on learner-centered classrooms and scholarship on faculty of color's teaching experiences, as well as the incorporation of personal vignettes, the author argues that scholarship on learner-centered classrooms in higher education excludes faculty of color epistemologically, or as sources of knowledge about learner-centered classrooms, and experientially, as practitioners enacting learner-centered pedagogical practice. In fact, many recommendations in the literature on learner-centered classrooms directly contradict scholarship on the experiences, challenges, and best practices of faculty of color. This paper ends with directions for future research and practice.

以学习者为中心的课堂是一种合作学习空间,教师有意将学生的需求、经验和反馈纳入其中,以设计课程目标、材料和评估。本文关注的问题是:关于以学习者为中心的课堂的文献在多大程度上解决了高等教育中有色人种教师独特的教学挑战?通过对以学习者为中心的课堂的基础文献和关于有色人种教师教学经历的学术研究的回顾,以及个人小插曲的结合,作者认为,高等教育中以学习者为主的课堂的学术研究在认识论上排除了有色人种教师,从经验上讲,作为实施以学习者为中心的教学实践的实践者。事实上,文献中关于以学习者为中心的课堂的许多建议与关于有色人种教师的经验、挑战和最佳实践的学术研究直接矛盾。本文最后提出了今后研究和实践的方向。
{"title":"“Or is that just your opinion?“: Incorporating faculty of color into the foundational literature on learner-centered classrooms—A review","authors":"Derisa Grant","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100512","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100512","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Learner-centered classrooms are cooperative learning spaces in which instructors intentionally incorporate the needs, experiences, and feedback of students in order to design course objectives, materials, and assessments. This paper is concerned with the question: To what extent does the literature on learner-centered classrooms address the unique teaching challenges of faculty of color in higher education? Through a review of the foundational literature on learner-centered classrooms and scholarship on faculty of color's teaching experiences, as well as the incorporation of personal vignettes, the author argues that scholarship on learner-centered classrooms in higher education excludes faculty of color <em>epistemologically</em>, or as sources of knowledge about learner-centered classrooms, and <em>experientially</em>, as practitioners enacting learner-centered pedagogical practice. In fact, many recommendations in the literature on learner-centered classrooms directly contradict scholarship on the experiences, challenges, and best practices of faculty of color. This paper ends with directions for future research and practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100512"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Synthesizing research evidence on self-regulated learning and academic achievement in online and blended learning environments: A scoping review 综合在线和混合学习环境中自我调节学习和学业成绩的研究证据:范围界定综述
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100510
Zhihong Xu , Yingying Zhao , Jeffrey Liew , Xuan Zhou , Ashlynn Kogut

The present study synthesizes research evidence on self-regulated learning (SRL) and academic achievement in online and blended learning environments from intervention and cross-sectional studies. We examined 163 studies conducted in various countries and different learning contexts in terms of study characteristics, methodology, and SRL features. The current study found that SRL in the online and blended learning contexts has been an important topic and has received increased attention. The results revealed the importance of SRL for improving students' academic performance in the STEM field. It also demonstrated that the majority of the studies adopted multiple SRL strategies throughout mixed phases. This study confirmed the effectiveness of SRL on academic achievement in online or blended learning. However, the present study also identified that research on children's and adolescents' SRL strategies in online learning contexts is urgently needed and most of the available research did not focus on the preparatory and planning phases of SRL which are extremely important.

本研究综合了来自干预和横断面研究的关于在线和混合学习环境中自我调节学习(SRL)和学术成就的研究证据。我们对163项在不同国家和不同学习背景下进行的研究进行了研究,包括研究特征、方法和SRL特征。目前的研究发现,在线和混合学习环境中的SRL已经成为一个重要的话题,并受到越来越多的关注。研究结果揭示了SRL对提高学生在STEM领域的学习成绩的重要性。研究还表明,大多数研究在混合阶段采用了多种SRL策略。本研究证实了SRL对在线或混合学习中学业成绩的有效性。然而,本研究还发现,迫切需要对儿童和青少年在在线学习环境中的SRL策略进行研究,而且大多数现有研究都没有关注SRL的准备和规划阶段,这一阶段非常重要。
{"title":"Synthesizing research evidence on self-regulated learning and academic achievement in online and blended learning environments: A scoping review","authors":"Zhihong Xu ,&nbsp;Yingying Zhao ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Liew ,&nbsp;Xuan Zhou ,&nbsp;Ashlynn Kogut","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100510","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100510","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study synthesizes research evidence on self-regulated learning (SRL) and academic achievement in online and blended learning environments from intervention and cross-sectional studies. We examined 163 studies conducted in various countries and different learning contexts in terms of study characteristics, methodology, and SRL features. The current study found that SRL in the online and blended learning contexts has been an important topic and has received increased attention. The results revealed the importance of SRL for improving students' academic performance in the STEM field. It also demonstrated that the majority of the studies adopted multiple SRL strategies throughout mixed phases. This study confirmed the effectiveness of SRL on academic achievement in online or blended learning. However, the present study also identified that research on children's and adolescents' SRL strategies in online learning contexts is urgently needed and most of the available research did not focus on the preparatory and planning phases of SRL which are extremely important.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100510"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Uncovering important 21st-century skills for sustainable career development of social sciences graduates: A systematic review 揭示21世纪社会科学毕业生可持续职业发展的重要技能:系统综述
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100528
Ayşegül Karaca-Atik, Marieke Meeuwisse, Marjan Gorgievski, Guus Smeets

Background

Teaching 21st-century skills is widely recognized as an important task of higher education. However, an overview of which skills students need to obtain a sustainable career is missing. Using the Framework for 21st Century Learning (P21, 2019a) and the model of sustainable careers (de Vos et al., 2020), we aimed to take stock of current knowledge on which 21st-century skills are considered important for social sciences students’ sustainable career development and how these skills contribute to their career sustainability.

Methods

For this systematic review, we searched EconLit, ERIC, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS), PsycINFO, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, and Web of Science on May 28, 2021. We selected peer-reviewed empirical articles that were published between 2003 and 2019 and addressed graduates' and employers' perspectives on the skills needed for social sciences graduates’ career sustainability. Twelve articles met all our selection criteria and were included for a thematic analysis after quality appraisal.

Results

The included articles operationalized the career sustainability of social sciences graduates mostly in terms of finding a job and maintaining employment, to a lesser extent as high job performance, job satisfaction, and work engagement. Communication and problem solving skills were most frequently reported by both social sciences graduates and employers as crucial for a sustainable career. In addition, critical thinking, initiative and self-direction, and social and cross-cultural skills were also reported as important skills. None of the studies investigated mechanisms that would explain how these skills would exactly contribute to social science graduates’ career sustainability.

Discussion

The results of this review showed that studies to date have addressed only a limited number of career sustainability indicators. Moreover, explanatory mechanisms have largely been ignored. This is an important gap in the literature that future studies would need to address by building on the existing sustainable career development models.

背景21世纪技能教学被广泛认为是高等教育的一项重要任务。然而,缺少对学生获得可持续职业所需技能的概述。利用《21世纪学习框架》(P212019a)和可持续职业模型(de Vos et al.,2020),我们旨在评估当前的知识,在这些知识上,21世纪的技能被认为对社会科学学生的可持续职业发展很重要,以及这些技能如何有助于他们的职业可持续性。方法在2021年5月28日检索EconLit、ERIC、国际社会科学参考书目(IBSS)、PsycINFO、Scopus、社会学文摘和Web of Science。我们选择了2003年至2019年间发表的同行评审的实证文章,探讨了毕业生和雇主对社会科学毕业生职业可持续性所需技能的看法。12篇文章符合我们的所有选择标准,并在质量评估后纳入主题分析。结果纳入的文章主要从找工作和维持就业的角度来操作社会科学毕业生的职业可持续性,在较小程度上是高工作绩效、工作满意度和工作敬业度。社会科学毕业生和雇主最常报告说,沟通和解决问题的技能对可持续职业至关重要。此外,批判性思维、主动性和自我指导以及社交和跨文化技能也被报告为重要技能。没有一项研究调查了解释这些技能如何对社会科学毕业生的职业可持续性做出确切贡献的机制。讨论这项审查的结果表明,迄今为止的研究只涉及数量有限的职业可持续性指标。此外,解释机制在很大程度上被忽视了。这是文献中的一个重要空白,未来的研究需要在现有可持续职业发展模型的基础上加以解决。
{"title":"Uncovering important 21st-century skills for sustainable career development of social sciences graduates: A systematic review","authors":"Ayşegül Karaca-Atik,&nbsp;Marieke Meeuwisse,&nbsp;Marjan Gorgievski,&nbsp;Guus Smeets","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100528","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100528","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Teaching 21st-century skills is widely recognized as an important task of higher education. However, an overview of which skills students need to obtain a sustainable career is missing. Using the Framework for 21st Century Learning (P21, 2019a) and the model of sustainable careers (de Vos et al., 2020), we aimed to take stock of current knowledge on which 21st-century skills are considered important for social sciences students’ sustainable career development and how these skills contribute to their career sustainability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>For this systematic review, we searched EconLit, ERIC, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS), PsycINFO, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, and Web of Science on May 28, 2021. We selected peer-reviewed empirical articles that were published between 2003 and 2019 and addressed graduates' and employers' perspectives on the skills needed for social sciences graduates’ career sustainability. Twelve articles met all our selection criteria and were included for a thematic analysis after quality appraisal.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The included articles operationalized the career sustainability of social sciences graduates mostly in terms of finding a job and maintaining employment, to a lesser extent as high job performance, job satisfaction, and work engagement. Communication and problem solving skills were most frequently reported by both social sciences graduates and employers as crucial for a sustainable career. In addition, critical thinking, initiative and self-direction, and social and cross-cultural skills were also reported as important skills. None of the studies investigated mechanisms that would explain how these skills would exactly contribute to social science graduates’ career sustainability.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The results of this review showed that studies to date have addressed only a limited number of career sustainability indicators. Moreover, explanatory mechanisms have largely been ignored. This is an important gap in the literature that future studies would need to address by building on the existing sustainable career development models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100528"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
A systematic literature review of K-12 environmental Citizen Science (CS) initiatives: Unveiling the CS pedagogical and participatory aspects contributing to students’ environmental citizenship K-12环境公民科学(CS)倡议的系统文献综述:揭示有助于学生环境公民意识的CS教学和参与方面
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100525
Demetra Hadjichambi , Andreas Ch. Hadjichambis , Anastasia Adamou , Yiannis Georgiou

Environmental Citizen Science (CS) initiatives have been largely embraced in K-12 education, as they are often hypothesized to improve students' knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviours to act as “environmental citizens” according to the notion of Environmental Citizenship (EC). However, the potential of environmental CS initiatives to promote Education for Environmental Citizenship (EEC) has not been systematically explored. At the same time, environmental CS initiatives for educational purposes are highly heterogenous and learning is enacted in diverse ways, according to the participatory and the pedagogical components underpinning each initiative. To address the complexity of the field, this review study adopts the PRISMA methodology to synthesize thirty-four empirical studies (n = 34) retrieved from a systematic review of the literature covering the last two decades (2000–2020). The reviewed environmental CS initiatives were subjected to a content analysis to identify their impact on students' EC (e.g., EC competences, actions, outcomes), as well as to unveil the CS initiatives' constitutional components in terms of (a) Participation (e.g., types of students' contributions, level of data collection, frequency of students' participation, modes of student engagement, forms of students’ involvement), and (b) Pedagogy (e.g., learning goals, educational contexts, learning mechanisms, EEC pedagogy). Our analysis shed light to the three territories (Participation, Pedagogy, Environmental Citizenship) underpinning the reviewed CS initiatives as well as to their interrelations. We reflect on these findings, and we provide directions for future research to guide the development of more successful environmental CS initiatives in K-12 education, serving as a vehicle for EC.

环境公民科学(CS)倡议在K-12教育中得到了广泛的支持,因为根据环境公民(EC)的概念,这些倡议通常被假设为提高学生的知识、技能、态度和行为,以充当“环境公民”。然而,尚未系统地探讨环境公民制度倡议促进环境公民教育(EEC)的潜力。与此同时,出于教育目的的环境CS倡议是高度异质的,根据每项倡议的参与性和教学组成部分,学习是以不同的方式实施的。为了解决该领域的复杂性,本综述研究采用PRISMA方法综合了34项实证研究(n=34),这些研究是从过去二十年(2000-2020)的文献系统综述中检索到的。对审查的环境CS举措进行内容分析,以确定其对学生EC的影响(例如,EC能力、行动、结果),以及公布CS倡议在以下方面的组成部分:(a)参与(例如,学生的贡献类型、数据收集水平、学生参与的频率、学生参与模式、学生参与形式)和(b)教育学(例如,学习目标、教育背景、学习机制、EEC教育学)。我们的分析揭示了支持审查的CS倡议的三个领域(参与、教育学、环境公民)及其相互关系。我们反思了这些发现,并为未来的研究提供了方向,以指导在K-12教育中制定更成功的环境CS倡议,作为EC的载体。
{"title":"A systematic literature review of K-12 environmental Citizen Science (CS) initiatives: Unveiling the CS pedagogical and participatory aspects contributing to students’ environmental citizenship","authors":"Demetra Hadjichambi ,&nbsp;Andreas Ch. Hadjichambis ,&nbsp;Anastasia Adamou ,&nbsp;Yiannis Georgiou","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100525","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100525","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Environmental Citizen Science (CS) initiatives have been largely embraced in K-12 education, as they are often hypothesized to improve students' knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviours to act as “environmental citizens” according to the notion of Environmental Citizenship (EC). However, the potential of environmental CS initiatives to promote Education for Environmental Citizenship (EEC) has not been systematically explored. At the same time, environmental CS initiatives for educational purposes are highly heterogenous and learning is enacted in diverse ways, according to the participatory and the pedagogical components underpinning each initiative. To address the complexity of the field, this review study adopts the PRISMA methodology to synthesize thirty-four empirical studies (<em>n</em><span> = 34) retrieved from a systematic review<span> of the literature covering the last two decades (2000–2020). The reviewed environmental CS initiatives were subjected to a content analysis to identify their impact on students' EC (e.g., EC competences, actions, outcomes), as well as to unveil the CS initiatives' constitutional components in terms of (a) Participation (e.g., types of students' contributions, level of data collection, frequency of students' participation, modes of student engagement, forms of students’ involvement), and (b) Pedagogy (e.g., learning goals, educational contexts, learning mechanisms, EEC pedagogy). Our analysis shed light to the three territories (Participation, Pedagogy, Environmental Citizenship) underpinning the reviewed CS initiatives as well as to their interrelations. We reflect on these findings, and we provide directions for future research to guide the development of more successful environmental CS initiatives in K-12 education, serving as a vehicle for EC.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100525"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Effects of learner-generated outlining and instructor-provided outlining on learning from text: A meta-analysis 学习者生成的大纲和教师提供的大纲对文本学习的影响:一项荟萃分析
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100538
Héctor R. Ponce , Richard E. Mayer , Ester E. Méndez

Learning from printed text is a central academic task that may be challenging for students. Two ways to improve learning from text are to encourage learners to engage in generative learning strategies while reading, such as constructing an outline, or for instructors to include effective instructional design features, such as providing an outline with the text. A meta-analysis of studies comparing a group that was asked to generate an outline while reading a text to a control group that was not asked to outline found an average effect size of g+ = 0.59 on memory tests, g+ = 0.59 on comprehension tests, and g+ = 0.52 on writing assignments favoring learner-generated outlining. A meta-analysis of studies comparing a group that read a text containing an outline with a control group that read the same text without an outline found an effect size of g+ = 0.61 for memory tests and g+ = 0.34 for comprehension tests favoring instructor-provided outlining. Overall, there is encouraging evidence for the effectiveness of outlining as a generative learning strategy and for the effectiveness of outlining as an instructional design feature based on signaling, consistent with generative learning theory.

从印刷文本中学习是一项核心的学术任务,对学生来说可能具有挑战性。提高从文本中学习的两种方法是鼓励学习者在阅读时参与生成性学习策略,例如构建大纲,或者让教师包括有效的教学设计功能,例如为文本提供大纲。一项荟萃分析研究将一组被要求在阅读文本时生成提纲的组与一组未被要求生成提纲的对照组进行了比较,结果发现,在记忆测试中,平均效应大小为g+=0.59,在理解测试中,g+=0.49,在写作作业中,g++=0.52有利于学习者生成提纲。一项荟萃分析研究将阅读包含大纲的文本的组与阅读不包含大纲的同一文本的对照组进行了比较,发现记忆测试的效果大小为g+=0.61,理解测试的效果尺寸为g+=0.034,有利于教师提供的大纲。总体而言,有令人鼓舞的证据表明,大纲作为一种生成性学习策略是有效的,大纲作为基于信号的教学设计特征也是有效的,符合生成性学习理论。
{"title":"Effects of learner-generated outlining and instructor-provided outlining on learning from text: A meta-analysis","authors":"Héctor R. Ponce ,&nbsp;Richard E. Mayer ,&nbsp;Ester E. Méndez","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100538","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100538","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Learning from printed text is a central academic task that may be challenging for students. Two ways to improve learning from text are to encourage learners to engage in generative learning strategies while reading, such as constructing an outline, or for instructors to include effective instructional design features, such as providing an outline with the text. A meta-analysis of studies comparing a group that was asked to generate an outline while reading a text to a control group that was not asked to outline found an average effect size of <em>g+</em> = 0.59 on memory tests, <em>g+</em> = 0.59 on comprehension tests, and <em>g+</em> = 0.52 on writing assignments favoring learner-generated outlining. A meta-analysis of studies comparing a group that read a text containing an outline with a control group that read the same text without an outline found an effect size of <em>g+</em> = 0.61 for memory tests and <em>g+</em> = 0.34 for comprehension tests favoring instructor-provided outlining. Overall, there is encouraging evidence for the effectiveness of outlining as a generative learning strategy and for the effectiveness of outlining as an instructional design feature based on signaling, consistent with generative learning theory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100538"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50165907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Let's talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction 让我们谈谈证据——基于调查和直接指导相结合的情况
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100536
Ton de Jong , Ard W. Lazonder , Clark A. Chinn , Frank Fischer , Janice Gobert , Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver , Ken R. Koedinger , Joseph S. Krajcik , Eleni A. Kyza , Marcia C. Linn , Margus Pedaste , Katharina Scheiter , Zacharias C. Zacharia

Many studies investigating inquiry learning in science domains have appeared over the years. Throughout this period, inquiry learning has been regularly criticized by scholars who favor direct instruction over inquiry learning. In this vein, Zhang, Kirschner, Cobern, and Sweller (2022) recently asserted that direct instruction is overall superior to inquiry-based instruction and reproached policy makers for ignoring this fact. In the current article we reply to this assertion and the premises on which it is based. We review the evidence and argue that a more complete and correct interpretation of the literature demonstrates that inquiry-based instruction produces better overall results for acquiring conceptual knowledge than does direct instruction. We show that this conclusion holds for controlled, correlational, and program-based studies. We subsequently argue that inquiry-based and direct instruction each have their specific virtues and disadvantages and that the effectiveness of each approach depends on moderating factors such as the learning goal, the domain involved, and students' prior knowledge and other student characteristics. Furthermore, inquiry-based instruction is most effective when supplemented with guidance that can be personalized based on these moderating factors and can even involve providing direct instruction. Therefore, we posit that a combination of inquiry and direct instruction may often be the best approach to support student learning. We conclude that policy makers rightfully advocate inquiry-based instruction, particularly when students’ investigations are supplemented with direct instruction at appropriate junctures.

多年来,科学领域出现了许多研究探究性学习的研究。在这一时期,研究性学习经常受到学者的批评,他们倾向于直接指导而不是研究性学习。在这种情况下,张、Kirschner、Cobern和Sweller(2022)最近断言,直接指导总体上优于基于探究的指导,并指责政策制定者忽视了这一事实。在当前的文章中,我们对这一断言及其所基于的前提进行了回复。我们回顾了证据,认为对文献的更完整和正确的解释表明,与直接教学相比,基于探究的教学在获得概念知识方面产生了更好的整体结果。我们证明,这一结论适用于对照研究、相关研究和基于程序的研究。随后,我们认为,基于探究的教学和直接教学各有其优缺点,每种方法的有效性取决于调节因素,如学习目标、所涉及的领域、学生的先验知识和其他学生特征。此外,基于探究的教学在辅以基于这些调节因素的个性化指导时最为有效,甚至可以包括提供直接指导。因此,我们认为,探究和直接教学相结合可能是支持学生学习的最佳方法。我们的结论是,政策制定者理所当然地提倡基于探究的教学,特别是当学生的调查在适当的时候辅以直接教学时。
{"title":"Let's talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction","authors":"Ton de Jong ,&nbsp;Ard W. Lazonder ,&nbsp;Clark A. Chinn ,&nbsp;Frank Fischer ,&nbsp;Janice Gobert ,&nbsp;Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver ,&nbsp;Ken R. Koedinger ,&nbsp;Joseph S. Krajcik ,&nbsp;Eleni A. Kyza ,&nbsp;Marcia C. Linn ,&nbsp;Margus Pedaste ,&nbsp;Katharina Scheiter ,&nbsp;Zacharias C. Zacharia","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100536","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100536","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many studies investigating inquiry learning in science domains have appeared over the years. Throughout this period, inquiry learning has been regularly criticized by scholars who favor direct instruction over inquiry learning. In this vein, Zhang, Kirschner, Cobern, and Sweller (2022) recently asserted that direct instruction is overall superior to inquiry-based instruction and reproached policy makers for ignoring this fact. In the current article we reply to this assertion and the premises on which it is based. We review the evidence and argue that a more complete and correct interpretation of the literature demonstrates that inquiry-based instruction produces better overall results for acquiring conceptual knowledge than does direct instruction. We show that this conclusion holds for controlled, correlational, and program-based studies. We subsequently argue that inquiry-based and direct instruction each have their specific virtues and disadvantages and that the effectiveness of each approach depends on moderating factors such as the learning goal, the domain involved, and students' prior knowledge and other student characteristics. Furthermore, inquiry-based instruction is most effective when supplemented with guidance that can be personalized based on these moderating factors and can even involve providing direct instruction. Therefore, we posit that a combination of inquiry and direct instruction may often be the best approach to support student learning. We conclude that policy makers rightfully advocate inquiry-based instruction, particularly when students’ investigations are supplemented with direct instruction at appropriate junctures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100536"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50165911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Effectiveness of relationships and sex education: A systematic review of terminology, content, pedagogy, and outcomes 关系和性教育的有效性:对术语、内容、教学法和结果的系统综述
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100527
Lisa van Leent , Kerryann Walsh , Claire Moran , Kirstine Hand , Sally French

This paper presents a systematic review on published research on universal school-based relationships and sex education for children aged 4–18 years. The review excludes papers focused solely on targeted cohorts, specific content areas and approaches such as abstinence-only education. Systematic searches were conducted with 5007 papers identified and following three rounds of screening, 134 papers were included in this review. The review sought to identify the terms used to describe sex education, the content included in programs or curriculum, the approaches forming the basis for implementation, the methods used to evaluate programs including the outcomes assessed. We conclude that the terms used in the field are vast, the content varied, approaches were wide-ranging, methods numerous and claims to effectiveness fluctuated and at times contrasted. Future research should seek to identify consistency in terminology and content, identify pedagogical approaches that are fully described building on the field of expertise in education, and engage highly rigorous methods and expertise in evaluation. The field of sex education must be recognized socially and institutionally so that appropriate funding and resources can be distributed to achieve the depth and breadth of knowledge required to progress the field. The implications of this impact on children's access to and ability to develop knowledge, skills, behaviours and critical thinking about themselves and their relationships.

本文系统回顾了已发表的关于4-18岁儿童普遍学校关系和性教育的研究。该综述排除了仅关注目标人群、特定内容领域和方法(如纯禁欲教育)的论文。对5007篇论文进行了系统检索,经过三轮筛选,134篇论文被纳入本综述。该审查试图确定用于描述性教育的术语、项目或课程中包含的内容、构成实施基础的方法、用于评估项目的方法,包括评估的结果。我们得出的结论是,该领域使用的术语广泛,内容多样,方法广泛,方法众多,对有效性的主张起伏不定,有时甚至形成对比。未来的研究应寻求确定术语和内容的一致性,确定在教育专业知识领域充分描述的教学方法,并在评估中采用高度严格的方法和专业知识。性教育领域必须得到社会和制度的承认,以便能够分配适当的资金和资源,以实现该领域进步所需的知识的深度和广度。这种影响对儿童获得知识、技能、行为和对自己及其关系的批判性思维的机会和能力的影响。
{"title":"Effectiveness of relationships and sex education: A systematic review of terminology, content, pedagogy, and outcomes","authors":"Lisa van Leent ,&nbsp;Kerryann Walsh ,&nbsp;Claire Moran ,&nbsp;Kirstine Hand ,&nbsp;Sally French","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100527","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100527","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents a systematic review on published research on universal school-based relationships and sex education for children aged 4–18 years. The review excludes papers focused solely on targeted cohorts, specific content areas and approaches such as abstinence-only education. Systematic searches were conducted with 5007 papers identified and following three rounds of screening, 134 papers were included in this review. The review sought to identify the terms used to describe sex education, the content included in programs or curriculum, the approaches forming the basis for implementation, the methods used to evaluate programs including the outcomes assessed. We conclude that the terms used in the field are vast, the content varied, approaches were wide-ranging, methods numerous and claims to effectiveness fluctuated and at times contrasted. Future research should seek to identify consistency in terminology and content, identify pedagogical approaches that are fully described building on the field of expertise in education, and engage highly rigorous methods and expertise in evaluation. The field of sex education must be recognized socially and institutionally so that appropriate funding and resources can be distributed to achieve the depth and breadth of knowledge required to progress the field. The implications of this impact on children's access to and ability to develop knowledge, skills, behaviours and critical thinking about themselves and their relationships.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100527"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
On the role of linguistic features for comprehension and learning from STEM texts. A meta-analysis 论语言特征在STEM文本理解和学习中的作用。荟萃分析
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100533
Anselm R. Strohmaier , Timo Ehmke , Hendrik Härtig , Dominik Leiss

Learning from texts is an important part of STEM education, but linguistic text features can affect comprehension and learning. We synthesized 45 experimental studies that investigated the effect of linguistic modifications on STEM text comprehension and learning, with a total of N = 6477 learners. In a meta-regression, we distinguished between eight categories of linguistic modifications and several other moderators, including prior knowledge. We found a small positive mean effect of linguistic modifications (g = 0.15). In line with previous research, the results showed that learners with low content prior knowledge benefited more from linguistic modifications. Personalization and increasing clarity and elaboration had positive effects, while reducing complexity and increasing cohesion did not have significant effects. This study highlights the potential and limits of linguistic modifications in STEM texts and provides implications for educational practice.

从文本中学习是STEM教育的重要组成部分,但语言文本特征会影响理解和学习。我们综合了45项实验研究,调查了语言修饰对STEM文本理解和学习的影响,共有6477名学习者。在元回归中,我们区分了八类语言修饰和其他几个调节因子,包括先验知识。我们发现语言修饰的正均值效应很小(g=0.15)。与之前的研究一致,结果表明,具有低内容先验知识的学习者从语言修饰中受益更多。个性化、增加清晰度和精细化产生了积极影响,而减少复杂性和增加凝聚力没有产生显著影响。这项研究强调了STEM文本中语言修饰的潜力和局限性,并为教育实践提供了启示。
{"title":"On the role of linguistic features for comprehension and learning from STEM texts. A meta-analysis","authors":"Anselm R. Strohmaier ,&nbsp;Timo Ehmke ,&nbsp;Hendrik Härtig ,&nbsp;Dominik Leiss","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100533","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100533","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Learning from texts is an important part of STEM education, but linguistic text features can affect comprehension and learning. We synthesized 45 experimental studies that investigated the effect of linguistic modifications on STEM text comprehension and learning, with a total of </span><em>N</em><span> = 6477 learners. In a meta-regression, we distinguished between eight categories of linguistic modifications and several other moderators, including prior knowledge. We found a small positive mean effect of linguistic modifications (</span><em>g</em> = 0.15). In line with previous research, the results showed that learners with low content prior knowledge benefited more from linguistic modifications. Personalization and increasing clarity and elaboration had positive effects, while reducing complexity and increasing cohesion did not have significant effects. This study highlights the potential and limits of linguistic modifications in STEM texts and provides implications for educational practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100533"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50172660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The myth of contextual interference learning benefit in sports practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis 体育实践中情境干扰学习益处的神话:系统综述和荟萃分析
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100537
Achraf Ammar , Khaled Trabelsi , Mohamed Ali Boujelbane , Omar Boukhris , Jordan M. Glenn , Hamdi Chtourou , Wolfgang I. Schöllhorn

The contextual interference (CI) model hypothesizes random practice (high CI) leads to inferior acquisition, but superior retention and transfer capabilities compared to blocked practice (low CI). These phenomena are well established in laboratory settings. However, the transfer to applied settings, particularly in sports practice is still under discussion. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the possible generalisability of the CI phenomenon in sports-based contexts with regard to performance outcomes. Up to April 16th, 2022, five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Taylor & Francis, and SciELO) were used to search for relevant studies investigating differences between blocked and random schedules at post-acquisition, retention, and/or transfer tests. Using the PICOS criteria, a total of 933 records were screened. Outcomes evaluating the acquisition, retention, and/or transfer performances in sports skills in healthy participants were included. The quality of the selected studies was scored using the PEDro scale. Thirty-seven studies were selected, of which twenty-seven were of good quality and the remaining ten were rated as fair quality. Out of 205 overall pooled outcomes, only 43 performance outcomes (21%) agreed with the CI phenomenon after the acquisition (18 out of 103), retention (19 out of 84), and/or transfer (6 out of 36) phases. No statistically significant overall difference between blocked and random practice was detected at post-acquisition (effect size (ES) = 0.1, p = 0.154), retention (ES = −0.159, p = 0.141) or transfer testing (ES = −0.243, p = 0.071). The subgroup analysis showed inferior acquisition and superior retention following random practice only in individuals aged 20–24 years (ES = 0.282, p = 0.030 during the acquisition, and ES = −0.405, p = 0.011 during retention), with no difference at transfer testing for this specific age group. No similar significant effects have been concurrently identified during both acquisition and retention phases in any of the remaining subgroups (e.g., examined based on experience level, sports, skills, and testing protocol categories). The present results suggest CI effects can only be confirmed under very limited conditions, which seriously challenges the extension of CI effects to the sport context in general. Problematic conclusions for children's learning are discussed, as well as future research strategies to better understand counterintuitive learning approaches.

情境干扰(CI)模型假设随机练习(高CI)导致较差的习得,但与封闭练习(低CI)相比,具有较高的保留和转移能力。这些现象在实验室环境中得到了很好的证实。然而,转移到应用环境,特别是在体育实践中,仍在讨论中。这项系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估CI现象在基于体育的环境中对表现结果的可能普遍性。截至2022年4月16日,使用五个电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Taylor&;Francis和SciELO)搜索相关研究,调查获取后、保留和/或转移测试中阻断和随机时间表之间的差异。使用PICOS标准,共筛选了933份记录。包括评估健康参与者运动技能的获得、保留和/或转移表现的结果。使用PEDro量表对所选研究的质量进行评分。选择了37项研究,其中27项质量良好,其余10项质量尚可。在205个总体汇总结果中,只有43个绩效结果(21%)与收购(103个中的18个)、保留(84个中的19个)和/或转移(36个中的6个)阶段后的CI现象一致。在采集后,阻断和随机实践之间没有检测到统计学上显著的总体差异(效应大小(ES)=0.1、p=0.154),保留(ES=−0.159,p=0.141)或转移测试(ES=–0.243,p=0.071)。亚组分析显示,随机实践后,仅在20-24岁的个体中获得较差和保留较好(获得期间ES=0.282,p=0.030,保留期间ES=−0.405,p=0.011),在该特定年龄组的转移测试中没有差异。在任何剩余的亚组中,在获得和保留阶段都没有同时发现类似的显著影响(例如,根据经验水平、运动、技能和测试方案类别进行检查)。目前的结果表明,CI效应只能在非常有限的条件下得到证实,这严重挑战了CI效应在一般体育环境中的推广。讨论了儿童学习的问题结论,以及未来更好地理解违反直觉的学习方法的研究策略。
{"title":"The myth of contextual interference learning benefit in sports practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Achraf Ammar ,&nbsp;Khaled Trabelsi ,&nbsp;Mohamed Ali Boujelbane ,&nbsp;Omar Boukhris ,&nbsp;Jordan M. Glenn ,&nbsp;Hamdi Chtourou ,&nbsp;Wolfgang I. Schöllhorn","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100537","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100537","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The contextual interference (CI) model hypothesizes random practice (high CI) leads to inferior acquisition, but superior retention and transfer capabilities compared to blocked practice (low CI). These phenomena are well established in laboratory settings. However, the transfer to applied settings, particularly in sports practice is still under discussion. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the possible generalisability of the CI phenomenon in sports-based contexts with regard to performance outcomes. Up to April 16th, 2022, five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Taylor &amp; Francis, and SciELO) were used to search for relevant studies investigating differences between blocked and random schedules at post-acquisition, retention, and/or transfer tests. Using the PICOS criteria, a total of 933 records were screened. Outcomes evaluating the acquisition, retention, and/or transfer performances in sports skills in healthy participants were included. The quality of the selected studies was scored using the PEDro scale. Thirty-seven studies were selected, of which twenty-seven were of good quality and the remaining ten were rated as fair quality. Out of 205 overall pooled outcomes, only 43 performance outcomes (21%) agreed with the CI phenomenon after the acquisition (18 out of 103), retention (19 out of 84), and/or transfer (6 out of 36) phases. No statistically significant overall difference between blocked and random practice was detected at post-acquisition (effect size (</span><em>ES)</em> = 0.1, <em>p</em> = 0.154), retention (<em>ES</em> = −0.159, <em>p</em> = 0.141) or transfer testing (<em>ES</em> = −0.243, <em>p</em> = <em>0</em>.071). The subgroup analysis showed inferior acquisition and superior retention following random practice only in individuals aged 20–24 years (<em>ES</em> = 0.282, <em>p</em> = 0.030 during the acquisition, and <em>ES</em> = −0.405, <em>p</em> = 0.011 during retention), with no difference at transfer testing for this specific age group. No similar significant effects have been concurrently identified during both acquisition and retention phases in any of the remaining subgroups (e.g., examined based on experience level, sports, skills, and testing protocol categories). The present results suggest CI effects can only be confirmed under very limited conditions, which seriously challenges the extension of CI effects to the sport context in general. Problematic conclusions for children's learning are discussed, as well as future research strategies to better understand counterintuitive learning approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100537"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50165905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Educational Research Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1