Psychotherapy Research最新文献

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the implementation of suicide-focused treatments delivered via a hybrid telemental health (TMH) and in-person format.

Method: This study was conducted at four university counseling centers (UCCs) across the United States. Treatment-seeking clients were recruited from their local UCCs and participated in adaptive treatment strategies (ATSs) involving Treatment as Usual (TAU), Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS), and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT). Implementation outcomes, including appropriateness, acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, safety, and client satisfaction, were assessed. UCC clinicians participated in qualitative interviews focused on implementation of TMH for clients presenting with suicidal ideation (SI).

Results: Overall, treatments delivered via hybrid format were reported to be appropriate, acceptable, feasible, and satisfactory by clinicians and clients. Implementation of TMH was reported to be equivalent to in-person treatment across multiple measurement methods.

Conclusion: Results from this study demonstrate that TMH is an implementable treatment modality for addressing suicidality, particularly for college students presenting to UCCs with SI. This study has implications for real-world clinical settings planning to offer hybrid treatment modalities to address SI.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04728815.

Objective: With meta-analytically estimated rates of about 25%, dropout in psychotherapies is a major concern for individuals, clinicians, and the healthcare system at large. To be able to counteract dropout in psychotherapy, accurate insights about its predictors are needed.

Method: We compared logistic regression models with two machine learning algorithms (elastic net regressions and gradient boosting machines) in the prediction of therapy dropout in two large inpatient samples (N = 1,691 and N = 12,473) using baseline and initial process variables reported by patients and therapists.

Results: Predictive accuracies of the two machine learning algorithms were similar and higher than for logistic regressions: Therapy dropout could be predicted with an AUC of .73 and .83 for Sample 1 and 2, respectively. The initial evaluation of patients' motivation and the therapeutic alliance rated by the respective therapist were the most important predictors of dropout.

Conclusions: Therapy dropout in naturalistic inpatient settings can be predicted to a considerable degree by using baseline indicators and therapists' first impressions. Feature selection via regularization leads to higher predictive performances whereas non-linear or interaction effects are dispensable. The most promising point of intervention to reduce therapy dropouts seems to be patients' motivation and the therapeutic alliance.

Background: The move from inconsistent and problematic autobiographical narrative to a more coherent and reality-based narrative construction of the Self has been discussed as potential mechanism of change in psychotherapies for personality disorders. So far, little empirical evidence exists that demonstrates in a time-dependent design the role of narrative construction in the treatment of borderline personality disorder, in particular when it comes to understanding the integration of body-related information from the affective system with the autobiographical narrative. The present study aims at demonstrating change in emotion-based narrative markers over brief psychiatric treatment and to assess the impact of these changes on subsequent symptom change. Methods: A total of N = 57 clients with borderline personality disorder were assessed at three timepoint over the course of four months of brief psychiatric treatment, within the context of a secondary process-outcome analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Symptom change was assessed using the OQ-45.2 and emotion-narrative change was assessed using the Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System to code client's in-session speech in terms of problem, transition and change markers. Results: All three emotion-based marker categories evidenced significant changes in the assumed direction. The reduction in problem emotion-based narrative markers (e.g., empty story telling) between session 1 and 5 into the treatment predicted the symptom reduction assessed between session 5 and 10. Conclusions: Emotion-based narrative construction may be a suitable method to study the pathway of change toward a more coherent and reality-based narrative construction of the Self-in-interaction-with-the-Other. Reduction of emotion-based problem-marker may be a promising candidate for a mechanism of change in treatments for personality disorders which should be tested in a time-dependent controlled design.

Objective: This umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluates the effectiveness of Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) across various populations and settings.

Method: A total of 25 systematic reviews, including 15 meta-analyses, were analyzed. Reviews were included if they used systematic search methods and quality assessments and focused on the effectiveness of SFBT as a therapeutic approach.

Results: SFBT demonstrated significant positive outcomes across different issues, settings, and cultural contexts, with no evidence of harm. High confidence in evidence of effectiveness was established for depression, overall mental health, and progress towards individual goals for the adult population. In addition, findings indicated mainly moderate confidence in evidence of SFBT effectiveness for a wide variety of outcomes for all age groups. No difference was found in the confidence in the evidence by world region, though Western and Eastern studies researched some different aspects.

Conclusion: SFBT is an effective therapeutic approach for various psychological, social, school, medical, couple, or self-related issues. Further research with rigorous methodologies and comprehensive reporting is needed to strengthen the confidence in these findings and provide evidence for the brevity of the intervention.

Objective: Worldwide, the numbers of refugees and displaced people being exposed to traumatic and inhumane experiences are escalating, resulting in an enhanced need for appropriate psychological management of trauma in this at-risk group. This study explores therapists' perspectives on and preparedness for supporting adult refugees with trauma-related interventions.

Method: Therapists (N = 17), with varying ranges of experiences supporting adult refugee clients, were recruited nationally, and participated in semi-structured interviews, exploring their experiences and preparedness for therapeutically supporting refugee clients with trauma-related interventions. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. A Patient Public Involvement (PPI) approach was embedded within this study.

Results: Five major themes were developed throughout the analysis: (i) Therapists' Fears and Apprehensions in Meeting Client Complexities, (ii) Preparation and Support for Competency Development, (iii) Adjusting Preconceptions of the Nature of Therapeutic Work, (iv) Humanity Within the Therapeutic Relationship, and (v) Balancing Therapeutic Meaningfulness and Hardships.

Conclusion: Therapist training must reflect trauma-informed care and inter-cultural awareness to allow therapists to feel better prepared within mainstream and specialist services. Further, therapists' well-being needs to be prioritized to prevent vicarious trauma, burn-out and ultimately, improve interventions for clients.

Objective: To investigate the attitudes of mental health professionals towards Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) in Eastern and Western cultures.

Method: Two samples of American (N = 455) and Chinese (N = 505) mental health professionals completed the prevalent Monitoring and Feedback Attitudes Scale (MFA). We tested the measure's psychometric characteristics, measurement invariance, and latent mean difference across cultures.

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) found a two-factor structure of the MFA within both cohorts. The MFA subscales showed excellent internal consistency in both the Chinese and American samples. The MFA demonstrated partial scalar invariance between the two cultural groups, supporting the comparison of latent means among Chinese and American professionals. Chinese professionals perceived greater harm from ROM than their American counterparts.

Conclusions: The findings show that the MFA is a valid tool to evaluate and compare the US and Chinese mental health professionals' attitudes toward ROM, suggesting that the measure may be useful in both Eastern and Western cultures.

Objective: Systemic Therapy conceives mental health symptoms in the context of social systems. Previous meta-analyses on Systemic Therapy focused on symptoms. This meta-analysis aims to focus on family system functioning while including all types of outcomes.

Method: We conducted a systematic literature research in multiple databases (PsycInfo, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central). We included RCT-studies on adults with psychiatric diagnoses, which compared Systemic Therapy with active psychosocial control. The literature research resulted in 171 coded effect sizes of 32 RCTs. We conducted a random-effects three-level meta-analysis. We categorized outcomes into symptoms of patients, family system functioning, further secondary outcomes of patients, and psychopathology of family members.

Results: The results show a small significant overall effect size of g = .30 (CI: .15-.45, p < .001, k = 171, s = 32) for all outcomes. Systemic Therapy revealed small effect sizes with regard to family system functioning (g = .34, z = 3.51, p = .0004, k = 26, s = 12), symptoms (g = .30, z = 3.74, p = .0002, k = 73, s = 29), and further secondary outcomes (g = .32, z = 3.83, p = .0001, k = 63, s = 19). The effect sizes for psychopathology of family system members were reported rarely (k = 9, s = 6).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows the potential relevance of investigating family system functioning as a primary outcome for Systemic Therapy.

Objective: Psychodynamic child psychotherapy is an evidence-based approach for a range of child mental health difficulties and needs to constantly adapt to meet the needs of children. This study is the first to investigate whether the use of mentalization-based interventions (i.e., a focus on promoting attention control, emotion regulation, and explicit mentalization) predicted a good therapeutic outcome in online psychodynamic child therapy sessions conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The sample included 51 Turkish children (M_age = 7.43, 49% girls) with mixed emotional and behavioral problems. Independent raters coded 203 sessions from different phases in each child's treatment using the Mentalization-Based Treatment for Children Adherence Scale (MBT-CAS). Results: Multilevel modeling analyses showed children with higher emotional lability benefited more from attention control interventions compared to those with lower emotional lability. Discussion: Interventions that focus on developing the basic building blocks of mentalizing may be effective components of therapeutic action for online delivery of psychodynamic child psychotherapy, especially for children with greater emotional lability.

Objective: This study investigated the relationship between therapeutic techniques and session impact, by examining the replicability of findings observed in a university-based training clinic (Boswell et al., 2010) in another practice-oriented setting: private practice.

Method: N = 8 therapists completed session-level assessments of their technique use for N = 38 clients. The same client sample completed session-level assessments of session outcome. Technique-outcome associations were examined with multilevel models.

Results: As in Boswell et al., common factors were associated with positive session impact. For clients who received higher average common factor techniques (relative to their own therapist's caseload), session impact was the poorest in sessions with higher behavioral change techniques use (relative to the client's own average). Moreover, clients with the lowest average common factor techniques (relative to their therapist's caseload) reported better session impact in sessions that involved a higher degree of session-level behavioral change techniques (relative to their own average).

Conclusion: In line with Boswell et al., therapists should be mindful of the consistency of their routine technique use between- and within-clients, and this can be aided through collection of their own practice-oriented data.