Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-03-24DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2025.2481268
Lushna M Mehra, Alexander M Kallen, Miracle Potter, Nikhila S Udupa, Chloe P Bryen, Therese S Kemper, Natalie J Sachs-Ericsson, Thomas E Joiner
Objective: Several studies have identified therapist cultural humility as an important predictor of client psychotherapy outcomes, yet most have been conducted cross-sectionally, retrospectively, and/or with inconsistent assessment of other related therapy process constructs. Here, we bridge this gap by examining early treatment ratings of therapist cultural humility, multicultural competence, working alliance, and client-centered treatment approaches as prospective predictors of client functioning in an active community clinic.
Method: Fifty participants (56% women, 10% gender diverse; 44% ethnoracially diverse), aged 18-69, rated these factors within 12 weeks of intake in a community mental health clinic. Therapists assessed client functioning at pre-treatment screening, diagnostic feedback, and treatment termination.
Results: Multilevel modeling analyses indicated clients rating higher therapist cultural humility in early treatment had the largest improvements in therapist-rated functioning from pre-treatment to termination. Notably, the association between therapist cultural humility and client functioning at termination was moderated by ethnoracial status, with higher cultural humility ratings predicting better client functioning at termination solely for ethnoracially diverse clients.
Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of integrating cultural humility instruction in training programs and therapeutic standards to promote mental health equity.
{"title":"Therapist cultural humility in early psychotherapy: A catalyst for improved client functioning at treatment termination.","authors":"Lushna M Mehra, Alexander M Kallen, Miracle Potter, Nikhila S Udupa, Chloe P Bryen, Therese S Kemper, Natalie J Sachs-Ericsson, Thomas E Joiner","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2481268","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2481268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several studies have identified therapist cultural humility as an important predictor of client psychotherapy outcomes, yet most have been conducted cross-sectionally, retrospectively, and/or with inconsistent assessment of other related therapy process constructs. Here, we bridge this gap by examining early treatment ratings of therapist cultural humility, multicultural competence, working alliance, and client-centered treatment approaches as prospective predictors of client functioning in an active community clinic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Fifty participants (56% women, 10% gender diverse; 44% ethnoracially diverse), aged 18-69, rated these factors within 12 weeks of intake in a community mental health clinic. Therapists assessed client functioning at pre-treatment screening, diagnostic feedback, and treatment termination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multilevel modeling analyses indicated clients rating higher therapist cultural humility in early treatment had the largest improvements in therapist-rated functioning from pre-treatment to termination. Notably, the association between therapist cultural humility and client functioning at termination was moderated by ethnoracial status, with higher cultural humility ratings predicting better client functioning at termination solely for ethnoracially diverse clients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underscore the importance of integrating cultural humility instruction in training programs and therapeutic standards to promote mental health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"287-307"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143701755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-03-05DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2025.2469256
M Onsjö, U Axberg, O Hultmann, J Strand
Objective: Exposure to family violence in childhood significantly increases the risk of developing severe psychiatric and physiological illnesses. Trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (TF-CBT) effectively addresses trauma-related symptoms and improves overall well-being. However, knowledge of the persistence of these positive effects over time, facilitating factors, and why some children are not benefited remains limited. Furthermore, little attention has been paid to exploring children's subjective experiences. This study aimed to investigate long-term changes in trauma-related symptoms among children and youths who underwent TF-CBT due to family violence. Nine participants (M age = 16,6 years, range = 14-23; 7 girls and 2 boys) were assessed and interviewed four to five years after TF-CBT treatment.
Methods: The study adopted a mixed-method approach, integrating quantitative and qualitative methods.
Results: While most participants still reported being affected by the violence, most had benefited from treatment, with improvements lasting over the years. However, for those who did not report decreased symptoms, trauma symptoms persisted, accompanied by additional severe mental health problems.
Conclusions: The findings underscore the importance of providing effective trauma-focused treatments such as TF-CBT and highlight the need for enhanced safety measures and parental interventions for children who do not benefit from treatment.
{"title":"A mixed-methods evaluation of long-term outcomes after trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy for children subjected to family violence.","authors":"M Onsjö, U Axberg, O Hultmann, J Strand","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2469256","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2469256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Exposure to family violence in childhood significantly increases the risk of developing severe psychiatric and physiological illnesses. Trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (TF-CBT) effectively addresses trauma-related symptoms and improves overall well-being. However, knowledge of the persistence of these positive effects over time, facilitating factors, and why some children are not benefited remains limited. Furthermore, little attention has been paid to exploring children's subjective experiences. This study aimed to investigate long-term changes in trauma-related symptoms among children and youths who underwent TF-CBT due to family violence. Nine participants (<i>M</i> age = 16,6 years, range = 14-23; 7 girls and 2 boys) were assessed and interviewed four to five years after TF-CBT treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study adopted a mixed-method approach, integrating quantitative and qualitative methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While most participants still reported being affected by the violence, most had benefited from treatment, with improvements lasting over the years. However, for those who did not report decreased symptoms, trauma symptoms persisted, accompanied by additional severe mental health problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings underscore the importance of providing effective trauma-focused treatments such as TF-CBT and highlight the need for enhanced safety measures and parental interventions for children who do not benefit from treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"324-338"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143568558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-04-15DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2025.2481604
Mathea Fretheim Walle, Maria Härter Langvik, Reidar Schei Jessen, Line Indrevoll Stänicke
Objective: This study aims to review and synthesise qualitative studies of the subjective experiences of clinicians working with adolescents (11-18 years of age) who self-harm.
Method: We conducted a systematic literature search and included 14 studies in a meta-synthesis, applying Noblit and Hare's (1988) [Meta-ethnography - synthesizing qualitative studies. SAGE Publications] seven analytical steps for meta-ethnography.
Results: The meta-synthesis resulted in three meta-themes that narrate a process of the emotional experiences of being in a professional relationship with adolescents who self-harm: (1) "Sharing the pain - The relationship as a vehicle to help, understand, and protect"; (2) "Carrying the pain - Self-harm evokes strong feelings"; and (3) "Tolerating the pain - To show a way out".
Conclusion: Working with self-harm may represent a challenging balance for clinicians between exploring the pain in the therapeutic relationship, while also managing their own ability to tolerate the difficult emotions in this work.
{"title":"Sharing, carrying, and tolerating the pain - A meta-synthesis of clinicians' experiences from working with adolescents who self-harm.","authors":"Mathea Fretheim Walle, Maria Härter Langvik, Reidar Schei Jessen, Line Indrevoll Stänicke","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2481604","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2481604","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to review and synthesise qualitative studies of the subjective experiences of clinicians working with adolescents (11-18 years of age) who self-harm.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature search and included 14 studies in a meta-synthesis, applying Noblit and Hare's (1988) [<i>Meta-ethnography - synthesizing qualitative studies</i>. SAGE Publications] seven analytical steps for meta-ethnography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-synthesis resulted in three meta-themes that narrate a process of the emotional experiences of being in a professional relationship with adolescents who self-harm: (1) \"Sharing the pain - The relationship as a vehicle to help, understand, and protect\"; (2) \"Carrying the pain - Self-harm evokes strong feelings\"; and (3) \"Tolerating the pain - To show a way out\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Working with self-harm may represent a challenging balance for clinicians between exploring the pain in the therapeutic relationship, while also managing their own ability to tolerate the difficult emotions in this work.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"339-352"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144064932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-05-05DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2025.2491477
Linda Severinsen, Jan Reidar Stiegler, Helene Amundsen Nissen-Lie, Ben Shahar, Thomas Bjerregaard Bertelsen, Rune Zahl-Olsen
Objective: Emotion-focused skills training for parents (EFST) is a parental guidance intervention aimed at strengthening emotional bonds between parent and child and improve children's mental health. In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), EFST was compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in a Norwegian public outpatient clinic for child and adolescent mental health. The hypothesis was that EFST would be equal or superior to TAU in effectiveness on remission of diagnoses and symptomatic change for children.
Method: Seventy-two clients were randomly assigned to an EFST intervention or an integrative family-based intervention (TAU). The main outcome measure was the semi-structured diagnostic interview Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS-PL), administered at pretreatment and after three months. The secondary outcome was the DSM-IV version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Bayesian statistical methods, including clinically informed priors, were used to compare the effectiveness of the two interventions.
Results: Forty-four percent (15 of 34 clients) attained diagnostic remission in the EFST condition compared to 26 percent (10 of 38 clients) in TAU. The proportion of symptomatic decline was equivalent in both conditions.
Conclusion: The results support the hypothesis that EFST was equal or superior to TAU in effectiveness in a public outpatient setting.
{"title":"Effectiveness of emotion-focused skills training (EFST) for parents: A randomized controlled trial investigating remission of mental health diagnosis and symptom reduction in children.","authors":"Linda Severinsen, Jan Reidar Stiegler, Helene Amundsen Nissen-Lie, Ben Shahar, Thomas Bjerregaard Bertelsen, Rune Zahl-Olsen","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2491477","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2491477","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Emotion-focused skills training for parents (EFST) is a parental guidance intervention aimed at strengthening emotional bonds between parent and child and improve children's mental health. In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), EFST was compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in a Norwegian public outpatient clinic for child and adolescent mental health. The hypothesis was that EFST would be equal or superior to TAU in effectiveness on remission of diagnoses and symptomatic change for children.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Seventy-two clients were randomly assigned to an EFST intervention or an integrative family-based intervention (TAU). The main outcome measure was the semi-structured diagnostic interview Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS-PL), administered at pretreatment and after three months. The secondary outcome was the DSM-IV version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Bayesian statistical methods, including clinically informed priors, were used to compare the effectiveness of the two interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four percent (15 of 34 clients) attained diagnostic remission in the EFST condition compared to 26 percent (10 of 38 clients) in TAU. The proportion of symptomatic decline was equivalent in both conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results support the hypothesis that EFST was equal or superior to TAU in effectiveness in a public outpatient setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"372-383"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144051597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-04-19DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2025.2488019
Nina R Schwarzbach, Rink Hoekstra, Anika Poppe, Theo K Bouman, Gerdina H M Pijnenborg
Objective: In this review, we explore challenges and factors related to the scientist-practitioner gap in psychotherapy.
Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature and conducted a qualitative thematic analysis describing the science-to-practice gap. We summarized various definitions and identified themes related to the science-to-practice gap in psychotherapy.
Results: Specific to psychotherapists, factors such as more scientific education, a cognitive-behavioral school orientation, and personal preferences reduce the gap. Moreover, as contextual factors, institutional support, incentives for employing evidence-based interventions, and supportive working environments foster more adherence to the principles of Evidence-Based Mental Health (EBMH). There are concerns about the validity and applicability of research evidence for clinical practice, including criticism of rigid research methodology that neglects the individuality of the therapeutic relationship, patients, and treatment complexity. Various epistemological assumptions influence the gap between science and practice. In addition to identifying strategies for bridging the gap, such as dialogue and collaboration between scientists and practitioners, we included a historical examination of the codes showing the trends of different themes over time.
Conclusion: We encourage dialogue between research and practice, a discussion on research priorities, clinical perspectives, diverse methodologies, individualized treatments, therapist practices, and policy incentives.
{"title":"When theory and therapy part ways-A scoping review of the science-to-practice gap.","authors":"Nina R Schwarzbach, Rink Hoekstra, Anika Poppe, Theo K Bouman, Gerdina H M Pijnenborg","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2488019","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2488019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this review, we explore challenges and factors related to the scientist-practitioner gap in psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed the literature and conducted a qualitative thematic analysis describing the science-to-practice gap. We summarized various definitions and identified themes related to the science-to-practice gap in psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Specific to psychotherapists, factors such as more scientific education, a cognitive-behavioral school orientation, and personal preferences reduce the gap. Moreover, as contextual factors, institutional support, incentives for employing evidence-based interventions, and supportive working environments foster more adherence to the principles of Evidence-Based Mental Health (EBMH). There are concerns about the validity and applicability of research evidence for clinical practice, including criticism of rigid research methodology that neglects the individuality of the therapeutic relationship, patients, and treatment complexity. Various epistemological assumptions influence the gap between science and practice. In addition to identifying strategies for bridging the gap, such as dialogue and collaboration between scientists and practitioners, we included a historical examination of the codes showing the trends of different themes over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We encourage dialogue between research and practice, a discussion on research priorities, clinical perspectives, diverse methodologies, individualized treatments, therapist practices, and policy incentives.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"421-441"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144051620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-19DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2026.2615388
Vera Békés, Katie Aafjes-van Doorn
Objective: Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) offer scalable solutions to traditional barriers in mental healthcare. Acceptability of DMHIs might differ among patients with differing level of symptoms and relational difficulties. This study investigated how a person's psychological profile, including their level of mental health symptoms, epistemic trust, and attachment security, predicts their acceptance of AI-based interventions (avatars, chatbots) versus human-delivered teletherapy.
Method: Using cluster analysis on survey data from 1,612 (potential) patients and clinicians recruited via Prolifc, we identified three distinct psychological profiles: "Avoidant-not trusting," "Secure-trusting-healthy," and "Young-anxious-ambivalent-symptomatic."
Results: Results showed a paradoxical pattern: Individuals in the two most vulnerable clusters ("Avoidant-not trusting" and "Young-anxious-ambivalent-symptomatic") demonstrated significantly higher acceptance of AI-based DMHIs. In contrast, the psychologically healthier "Secure-trusting-healthy" cluster showed the lowest AI-based DMHI acceptance and the highest acceptance of teletherapy. Also, having therapy experience as provider or patient was associated with lower AI acceptance in general.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that AI-based interventions may be uniquely suited to reach individuals who struggle with human-to-human therapeutic relationships, thereby serving as a critical entry point to care for those who need it most. However, those vulnerable people might also miss out on the relational learning that takes place in human-based therapies.
{"title":"The most vulnerable are prone to use AI therapists: The role of attachment, epistemic trust, and mental health symptoms in acceptance of digital mental health interventions.","authors":"Vera Békés, Katie Aafjes-van Doorn","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2026.2615388","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2026.2615388","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) offer scalable solutions to traditional barriers in mental healthcare. Acceptability of DMHIs might differ among patients with differing level of symptoms and relational difficulties. This study investigated how a person's psychological profile, including their level of mental health symptoms, epistemic trust, and attachment security, predicts their acceptance of AI-based interventions (avatars, chatbots) versus human-delivered teletherapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using cluster analysis on survey data from 1,612 (potential) patients and clinicians recruited via Prolifc, we identified three distinct psychological profiles: \"Avoidant-not trusting,\" \"Secure-trusting-healthy,\" and \"Young-anxious-ambivalent-symptomatic.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed a paradoxical pattern: Individuals in the two most vulnerable clusters (\"Avoidant-not trusting\" and \"Young-anxious-ambivalent-symptomatic\") demonstrated significantly higher acceptance of AI-based DMHIs. In contrast, the psychologically healthier \"Secure-trusting-healthy\" cluster showed the lowest AI-based DMHI acceptance and the highest acceptance of teletherapy. Also, having therapy experience as provider or patient was associated with lower AI acceptance in general.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that AI-based interventions may be uniquely suited to reach individuals who struggle with human-to-human therapeutic relationships, thereby serving as a critical entry point to care for those who need it most. However, those vulnerable people might also miss out on the relational learning that takes place in human-based therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145998920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-18DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2026.2615383
S S Høgenhaug, S V Steffensen, M T Kongerslev, M F Larsen, A E Christensen, G Kjaersdam Telléus
Objective: Alliance rupture frequency and absence of repair are associated with poorer therapeutic outcomes. Prior research suggests different diagnoses may show distinct rupture patterns, with personality disorder (PD) treatments often displaying higher rupture rates compared to other diagnosis. Evidence, however, remains insufficient to inform clinical practice. This study aimed to expand knowledge on frequency of rupture markers and use of repair strategies across diagnoses and examine their relationship to outcome.
Method: In a naturalistic setting, 392 video-recorded sessions from nine PD and seven anxiety disorder (AD) treatments were rated with the Rupture Resolution Rating System. Outcome was assessed with the Symptom Checklist (SCL-92), and mixed-effect models compared groups across timepoints.
Results: No statistically significant differences were revealed between the groups in the comparison of frequency of rupture markers and repair strategy use. A trend toward more patient-initiated confrontation rupture markers in PD was observed. Higher patient-initiated rupture marker frequency correlated with greater symptom severity on five SCL-92 subscales somatization, anxiety, phobia, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism but not with the global severity index.
Conclusion: Findings indicate that patient-initiated rupture marker frequency is linked to treatment outcome. Frequency of rupture markers and repair strategy use might vary individually in naturalistic clinical settings, but the limited sample size warrant further study.
{"title":"Frequencies of rupture markers and use of repair strategies and their relationship to psychotherapy outcomes in naturalistic clinical settings: A comparative study of personality disorders and anxiety disorders.","authors":"S S Høgenhaug, S V Steffensen, M T Kongerslev, M F Larsen, A E Christensen, G Kjaersdam Telléus","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2026.2615383","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2026.2615383","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Alliance rupture frequency and absence of repair are associated with poorer therapeutic outcomes. Prior research suggests different diagnoses may show distinct rupture patterns, with personality disorder (PD) treatments often displaying higher rupture rates compared to other diagnosis. Evidence, however, remains insufficient to inform clinical practice. This study aimed to expand knowledge on frequency of rupture markers and use of repair strategies across diagnoses and examine their relationship to outcome.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a naturalistic setting, 392 video-recorded sessions from nine PD and seven anxiety disorder (AD) treatments were rated with the Rupture Resolution Rating System. Outcome was assessed with the Symptom Checklist (SCL-92), and mixed-effect models compared groups across timepoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were revealed between the groups in the comparison of frequency of rupture markers and repair strategy use. A trend toward more patient-initiated confrontation rupture markers in PD was observed. Higher patient-initiated rupture marker frequency correlated with greater symptom severity on five SCL-92 subscales somatization, anxiety, phobia, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism but not with the global severity index.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings indicate that patient-initiated rupture marker frequency is linked to treatment outcome. Frequency of rupture markers and repair strategy use might vary individually in naturalistic clinical settings, but the limited sample size warrant further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145999522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2025.2610380
Onur Özmen, Gülşah Kemer
Objective: This study explored relational dynamics within a supervisory relationship, focusing on power, multicultural considerations, and parallel processes. Method: Guided by Gadamerian philosophical hermeneutics, the exploration relied on an iterative, reflexive engagement with eight recorded supervision sessions to interpret how these dynamics unfolded across time. Reflexive thematic analysis was used within a hermeneutic framework to identify relational patterns, and the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure served as an additional interpretive layer, providing the supervisor's professional perspective on supervisee personality tendencies. Results: Findings highlighted consistently fluctuating power negotiations, relationally embedded meanings shaping safety and disclosure, and tentative parallel processes that reflected patterns described in the supervisee's site supervision and client work. These dynamics appeared as interpretive layers rather than fixed mechanisms, emerging through the dialogical flow of supervision. Conclusion: The study offers process-level insights into how relational dynamics take shape within lived supervision, illustrating the value of hermeneutic inquiry for understanding supervision as an unfolding interpersonal experience. Implications for supervisors include attending to relational patterns as tentative cues for deeper inquiry.
{"title":"Monitoring power in context: A hermeneutic exploration of relational dynamics in counseling and psychotherapy supervision.","authors":"Onur Özmen, Gülşah Kemer","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2610380","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2610380","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study explored relational dynamics within a supervisory relationship, focusing on power, multicultural considerations, and parallel processes. <b>Method:</b> Guided by Gadamerian philosophical hermeneutics, the exploration relied on an iterative, reflexive engagement with eight recorded supervision sessions to interpret how these dynamics unfolded across time. Reflexive thematic analysis was used within a hermeneutic framework to identify relational patterns, and the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure served as an additional interpretive layer, providing the supervisor's professional perspective on supervisee personality tendencies. <b>Results:</b> Findings highlighted consistently fluctuating power negotiations, relationally embedded meanings shaping safety and disclosure, and tentative parallel processes that reflected patterns described in the supervisee's site supervision and client work. These dynamics appeared as interpretive layers rather than fixed mechanisms, emerging through the dialogical flow of supervision. <b>Conclusion:</b> The study offers process-level insights into how relational dynamics take shape within lived supervision, illustrating the value of hermeneutic inquiry for understanding supervision as an unfolding interpersonal experience. Implications for supervisors include attending to relational patterns as tentative cues for deeper inquiry.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-05DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2025.2610377
Dana Tzur Bitan
AbstractPsychotherapy expectations are considered one of the common factors influencing therapeutic success. Two broad dimensions of psychotherapy expectations have been identified: expectations about treatment benefits (outcome expectations/OEs) and expectations about the therapy process (treatment expectations/TEs). Both dimensions have been previously investigated; however, the evidence of TEs has been restricted by methodological limitations and the lack of an overarching theory to guide in-depth investigations. This state of affairs likely contributes to an ongoing under-estimation of expectation effects in psychotherapy, which tend to lag behind current knowledge about placebo effects. The aim of this paper is to present the rationale for adopting a "lay theory of psychotherapy" approach as a conceptual model for TEs. Based on its theoretical assumptions, it is suggested that these lay theories of psychotherapy can be operationalized as individuals' change process expectations, or what individuals view as the expected mechanism producing therapeutic change. Core components of lay theories and their operationalization as change process expectations are discussed, including their associations with process, role, and duration expectations, their dynamics, their associations with OEs, and their predictive effect on therapy outcomes. A review of literature supporting this model is presented, as well as directions for future research assessing its validity.
{"title":"Reframing treatment expectations: a lay theory perspective for understanding individuals' beliefs about psychotherapy.","authors":"Dana Tzur Bitan","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2610377","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2610377","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Abstract</b>Psychotherapy expectations are considered one of the common factors influencing therapeutic success. Two broad dimensions of psychotherapy expectations have been identified: expectations about treatment benefits (outcome expectations/OEs) and expectations about the therapy process (treatment expectations/TEs). Both dimensions have been previously investigated; however, the evidence of TEs has been restricted by methodological limitations and the lack of an overarching theory to guide in-depth investigations. This state of affairs likely contributes to an ongoing under-estimation of expectation effects in psychotherapy, which tend to lag behind current knowledge about placebo effects. The aim of this paper is to present the rationale for adopting a \"lay theory of psychotherapy\" approach as a conceptual model for TEs. Based on its theoretical assumptions, it is suggested that these lay theories of psychotherapy can be operationalized as individuals' change process expectations, or what individuals view as the expected mechanism producing therapeutic change. Core components of lay theories and their operationalization as change process expectations are discussed, including their associations with process, role, and duration expectations, their dynamics, their associations with OEs, and their predictive effect on therapy outcomes. A review of literature supporting this model is presented, as well as directions for future research assessing its validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145901359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-05DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2025.2609990
Frank J Don, Ellen Driessen, Jaap Peen, Jan Spijker, Henricus L Van, Jack J M Dekker
Objective: It is unclear whether cognitive reactivity (CR), an indicator of depression vulnerability, is reduced after cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), as theorized. It is also unclear whether baseline CR and dysfunctional attitudes (DA) are associated with treatment outcome in CBT for depression. This study aims to examine these questions and assess if these effects are specific to CBT for depression.
Method: Depressed adult outpatients (n = 159) randomized to 16 sessions CBT or short-term psychodynamic supportive therapy (SPSP) completed measures of depression severity and CR at baseline and post-treatment (week 22), DA at week 5, and depression severity at baseline, week 5 and 10, and post-treatment. Mixed-model analyses were applied to estimate CR change and the moderating effect of DA and CR on depression levels at post-treatment.
Results: CR decreased significantly with a medium effect size. CR was negatively associated with post-treatment depression levels. DA was inconsistently associated with treatment outcome. We found no indications that these findings were specific to CBT.
Conclusion: CR decreases in both CBT and SPSP, broadening treatment options. CR, and possibly DA, appear to be prognostic factors for treatment outcome, potentially indicating the need to consider additional or alternativetreatment.
{"title":"Cognitive reactivity and dysfunctional attitudes in cognitive behavioral and psychodynamic therapy for adult depression.","authors":"Frank J Don, Ellen Driessen, Jaap Peen, Jan Spijker, Henricus L Van, Jack J M Dekker","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2609990","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2609990","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is unclear whether cognitive reactivity (CR), an indicator of depression vulnerability, is reduced after cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), as theorized. It is also unclear whether baseline CR and dysfunctional attitudes (DA) are associated with treatment outcome in CBT for depression. This study aims to examine these questions and assess if these effects are specific to CBT for depression.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Depressed adult outpatients (n = 159) randomized to 16 sessions CBT or short-term psychodynamic supportive therapy (SPSP) completed measures of depression severity and CR at baseline and post-treatment (week 22), DA at week 5, and depression severity at baseline, week 5 and 10, and post-treatment. Mixed-model analyses were applied to estimate CR change and the moderating effect of DA and CR on depression levels at post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CR decreased significantly with a medium effect size. CR was negatively associated with post-treatment depression levels. DA was inconsistently associated with treatment outcome. We found no indications that these findings were specific to CBT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CR decreases in both CBT and SPSP, broadening treatment options. CR, and possibly DA, appear to be prognostic factors for treatment outcome, potentially indicating the need to consider additional or alternativetreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145901374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}