首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Learning Disabilities最新文献

英文 中文
Dysgraphia Differs Between Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder and/or Reading Disorder. 发育协调障碍和/或阅读障碍儿童的书写障碍存在差异。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI: 10.1177/00222194231223528
Caroline Jolly, Marianne Jover, Jérémy Danna

Handwriting deficits, or dysgraphia, are present in several neurodevelopmental disorders. To investigate whether dysgraphia differs according to the associated disorder, we performed a detailed analysis of handwriting in a group of French children with developmental coordination disorders (DCD), reading disorder (RD), or comorbid RD and DCD. Handwriting deficits were investigated at the product (quality of the trace) and the process (movement that generates the trace) levels. Nineteen children with singular RD (among which eight with dysgraphia), 13 children with singular DCD (among which seven with dysgraphia), 16 children with comorbid RD+DCD (among which 11 with dysgraphia), and 20 typically developing children, age 7 to 12, performed the BHK (Brave Handwriting Kinder) test, a standardized assessment of handwriting, on a graphic tablet. Developmental coordination disorders primarily affected handwriting quality, while RD affected slowness and, to a lesser extent, quality. Children with RD, solely or comorbid with DCD, wasted time by lifting and stopping the pen when writing. The comorbidity added to but did not worsen, handwriting difficulties. These results reflect distinct motor impairments and/or strategies in children with DCD or RD. We identified subtypes of dysgraphia and advocated for a fine-grained analysis of the writing process and the assessment of motor and reading skills when studying dysgraphia.

在多种神经发育障碍中都存在笔迹缺陷或书写障碍。为了研究书写障碍是否因相关疾病而有所不同,我们对患有发育协调障碍(DCD)、阅读障碍(RD)或合并有阅读障碍和发育协调障碍的儿童的笔迹进行了详细分析。我们从产品(痕迹的质量)和过程(产生痕迹的动作)两个层面对手写缺陷进行了研究。19 名患有单发 RD 的儿童(其中 8 名患有书写障碍)、13 名患有单发 DCD 的儿童(其中 7 名患有书写障碍)、16 名患有合并 RD+DCD 的儿童(其中 11 名患有书写障碍)和 20 名 7 至 12 岁发育正常的儿童在图形板上进行了 BHK(勇敢手写幼儿园)测试,这是一项标准化的手写评估。发育协调障碍主要影响书写质量,而 RD 则影响书写速度,其次才是书写质量。患有 RD 的儿童,无论是单独患有还是合并患有发育障碍,在书写时都会因为提笔和停笔而浪费时间。合并症加重了书写困难,但并未使其恶化。这些结果反映出患有 DCD 或 RD 的儿童存在不同的运动障碍和/或策略。我们确定了书写障碍的亚型,并主张在研究书写障碍时对书写过程进行精细分析,并对运动和阅读技能进行评估。
{"title":"Dysgraphia Differs Between Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder and/or Reading Disorder.","authors":"Caroline Jolly, Marianne Jover, Jérémy Danna","doi":"10.1177/00222194231223528","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194231223528","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Handwriting deficits, or dysgraphia, are present in several neurodevelopmental disorders. To investigate whether dysgraphia differs according to the associated disorder, we performed a detailed analysis of handwriting in a group of French children with developmental coordination disorders (DCD), reading disorder (RD), or comorbid RD and DCD. Handwriting deficits were investigated at the product (quality of the trace) and the process (movement that generates the trace) levels. Nineteen children with singular RD (among which eight with dysgraphia), 13 children with singular DCD (among which seven with dysgraphia), 16 children with comorbid RD+DCD (among which 11 with dysgraphia), and 20 typically developing children, age 7 to 12, performed the BHK (Brave Handwriting Kinder) test, a standardized assessment of handwriting, on a graphic tablet. Developmental coordination disorders primarily affected handwriting quality, while RD affected slowness and, to a lesser extent, quality. Children with RD, solely or comorbid with DCD, wasted time by lifting and stopping the pen when writing. The comorbidity added to but did not worsen, handwriting difficulties. These results reflect distinct motor impairments and/or strategies in children with DCD or RD. We identified subtypes of dysgraphia and advocated for a fine-grained analysis of the writing process and the assessment of motor and reading skills when studying dysgraphia.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"397-410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139571724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Community Data Sharing Resource: The LDbase Data Repository. 社区数据共享资源:LDbase 数据库。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241254091
Sara A Hart, Christopher Schatschneider, Tara Reynolds, Favenzio Calvo

The purpose of this invited paper is to show the learning disabilities field what LDbase is, why it's important for the field, what it offers the field, and examples of how you can leverage LDbase in your own work.

这篇特邀论文的目的是向学习障碍领域展示 LDbase 是什么、为什么它对该领域很重要、它能为该领域提供什么,并举例说明如何在自己的工作中利用 LDbase。
{"title":"A Community Data Sharing Resource: The LDbase Data Repository.","authors":"Sara A Hart, Christopher Schatschneider, Tara Reynolds, Favenzio Calvo","doi":"10.1177/00222194241254091","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194241254091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this invited paper is to show the learning disabilities field what LDbase is, why it's important for the field, what it offers the field, and examples of how you can leverage LDbase in your own work.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"411-416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542900/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141162257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Empowering Schools to Implement Effective Research-Based Reading Remediation Delivers Long-Lasting Improvements to Children's Reading Trajectories. 让学校有能力实施有效的、以研究为基础的阅读补救措施,从而长期改善儿童的阅读轨迹。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-27 DOI: 10.1177/00222194231215016
Erin J Panda, Trisha Woehrle, Jan C Frijters, Rhonda Moules, Sonia Zolis, Edie Edwards, Karen A Steinbach, Maria De Palma, Maureen W Lovett

There is a wide gap between what research evidence identifies as effective reading intervention and what is currently offered in schools. This effectiveness study reports the results of a long-term research/school system partnership that is implementing reading intervention for children with reading difficulties in Canadian community schools. In Study 1, growth-curve analyses revealed significant long-term shifts in the reading trajectories of children (n = 731) from Kindergarten to Grade 5 as a function of receiving the Empower™ Reading: Decoding and Spelling intervention. Long-term outcomes were higher in children who received intervention in Grade 2 than in Grade 3, supporting the benefit of earlier intervention. In Study 2, we compare reading outcomes before and after children participated in school system-led intervention (Empower™ Reading, n = 341) to results from previously reported researcher-led intervention and business-as-usual controls. Children in both school system-led and researcher-led interventions showed greater improvement than controls on standardized measures of decoding and reading comprehension. Among school system participants, greater gains were seen for those with stronger reading skills at pre-test. Findings demonstrate successful school system implementation of research-originated and validated reading intervention. Researcher/school system partnerships may be integral in closing the research-practice gap.

研究证据表明,有效的阅读干预措施与学校目前提供的干预措施之间存在很大差距。本有效性研究报告介绍了一项长期研究/学校系统合作项目的成果,该项目针对社区学校中有阅读困难的儿童实施阅读干预。在研究 1 中,成长曲线分析表明,从幼儿园到五年级,儿童(n = 731)的阅读轨迹在接受 Empower™ Reading:解码和拼写干预。与三年级相比,在二年级接受干预的儿童的长期成果更高,这证明了早期干预的益处。在研究 2 中,我们将儿童在参加学校系统主导的干预(Empower™ Reading,n = 341)前后的阅读结果与之前报告的研究人员主导的干预结果和 "一切照旧 "的对照结果进行了比较。与对照组相比,参加学校系统主导型干预和研究人员主导型干预的儿童在解码和阅读理解的标准化测量方面都取得了更大的进步。在学校系统参与者中,那些在测试前阅读能力较强的儿童取得了更大的进步。研究结果表明,学校系统成功实施了由研究人员发起并经过验证的阅读干预措施。研究人员与学校系统的合作可能是缩小研究与实践差距不可或缺的一部分。
{"title":"Empowering Schools to Implement Effective Research-Based Reading Remediation Delivers Long-Lasting Improvements to Children's Reading Trajectories.","authors":"Erin J Panda, Trisha Woehrle, Jan C Frijters, Rhonda Moules, Sonia Zolis, Edie Edwards, Karen A Steinbach, Maria De Palma, Maureen W Lovett","doi":"10.1177/00222194231215016","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194231215016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a wide gap between what research evidence identifies as effective reading intervention and what is currently offered in schools. This effectiveness study reports the results of a long-term research/school system partnership that is implementing reading intervention for children with reading difficulties in Canadian community schools. In Study 1, growth-curve analyses revealed significant long-term shifts in the reading trajectories of children (<i>n</i> = 731) from Kindergarten to Grade 5 as a function of receiving the Empower™ Reading: Decoding and Spelling intervention. Long-term outcomes were higher in children who received intervention in Grade 2 than in Grade 3, supporting the benefit of earlier intervention. In Study 2, we compare reading outcomes before and after children participated in school system-led intervention (Empower™ Reading, <i>n</i> = 341) to results from previously reported researcher-led intervention and business-as-usual controls. Children in both school system-led and researcher-led interventions showed greater improvement than controls on standardized measures of decoding and reading comprehension. Among school system participants, greater gains were seen for those with stronger reading skills at pre-test. Findings demonstrate successful school system implementation of research-originated and validated reading intervention. Researcher/school system partnerships may be integral in closing the research-practice gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"350-370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139040752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Low Literacy Levels Among U.S. Adults and Difficult Ballot Propositions. 美国成年人的低识字率与困难的投票提案。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241249958
Rebecca L Parker

High-level literacy skills are required for full participation in the democratic process through voting. Consequently, adults with low-level literacy skills are at a disadvantage. This work investigated the disparity between the readability of U.S. ballot propositions for year 2022 state elections and grade level reading estimates (≤eighth grade) for adults. Educational attainment was also examined. Propositions (n = 140) from 38 states were included. Mean readability was 18 (range 7.0-64.0). Only four measures (3%) fell within range of national estimates for adult reading ability. Thirty-nine percent of adults completed high school or less, yet 74% of ballots were written well above a high school reading level. There is a discrepancy between the literacy skills of the average voter and the readability of most propositions. The findings of this study have important implications for individuals with learning disabilities. Policy changes and educational support efforts should be initiated.

通过投票充分参与民主进程需要较高的识字能力。因此,识字水平低的成年人处于不利地位。这项研究调查了 2022 年各州选举中美国选票提案的可读性与成年人年级阅读水平估计值(≤ 八年级)之间的差距。同时还考察了受教育程度。包括来自 38 个州的提案(n = 140)。平均可读性为 18(范围为 7.0-64.0)。只有四项测量(3%)在全国成人阅读能力估计范围之内。39%的成年人完成了高中或高中以下教育,但 74% 的选票书写水平远高于高中阅读水平。普通选民的识字能力与大多数提案的可读性之间存在差异。这项研究的结果对有学习障碍的个人具有重要意义。应启动政策变革和教育支持工作。
{"title":"Low Literacy Levels Among U.S. Adults and Difficult Ballot Propositions.","authors":"Rebecca L Parker","doi":"10.1177/00222194241249958","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194241249958","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-level literacy skills are required for full participation in the democratic process through voting. Consequently, adults with low-level literacy skills are at a disadvantage. This work investigated the disparity between the readability of U.S. ballot propositions for year 2022 state elections and grade level reading estimates (≤eighth grade) for adults. Educational attainment was also examined. Propositions (<i>n</i> = 140) from 38 states were included. Mean readability was 18 (range 7.0-64.0). Only four measures (3%) fell within range of national estimates for adult reading ability. Thirty-nine percent of adults completed high school or less, yet 74% of ballots were written well above a high school reading level. There is a discrepancy between the literacy skills of the average voter and the readability of most propositions. The findings of this study have important implications for individuals with learning disabilities. Policy changes and educational support efforts should be initiated.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"339-349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perpetuating the Gaps: 21st-Century Skills in Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Typically Developing Peers. 差距持续存在:21世纪学习障碍学生及其正常同龄人的技能。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-14 DOI: 10.1177/00222194231211947
Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum, Israel Rachevski

This study examined whether there are differences between Israeli students with learning disabilities (LD) and their typically developing peers with regard to their 21st-century skills according to their self-report and whether the differences between the two groups are greater in postsecondary education than in high school-an aim that had not been examined in depth in previous research. Findings suggest that overall (beyond type of learner), in most skills, postsecondary education students reported higher scores than high school students on questionnaires designed for self-assessment of 21st-century skills. Second, students with LD exhibited lower scores in most 21st-century skills than their peers. Third, a comparison of the gaps in 21st-century skills between students with LD and their peers in each of the examined educational settings (i.e., high school vs postsecondary education) revealed that some of the gaps expand over the years, resulting in differences in additional skills. Results are discussed in the context of educational environment and its role in cultivating 21st-century skills and preparing students for integration into the labor market.

本研究考察了学习障碍学生(LD)与正常发展的同龄人之间在21世纪技能方面的自我报告是否存在差异,以及两组之间的差异是否在中学后教育中比在高中时更大——这一目标在以前的研究中没有深入研究。研究结果表明,总体而言(超越学习者类型),在大多数技能中,高等教育学生在为21世纪技能自我评估而设计的问卷上的得分高于高中生。其次,在大多数21世纪技能方面,LD学生的得分低于同龄人。第三,在每一种受调查的教育环境(即高中与高等教育)中,对LD学生与同龄人在21世纪技能方面的差距进行比较显示,一些差距随着时间的推移而扩大,导致其他技能的差异。结果在教育环境及其在培养21世纪技能和为学生融入劳动力市场做准备方面的作用的背景下进行了讨论。
{"title":"Perpetuating the Gaps: 21st-Century Skills in Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Typically Developing Peers.","authors":"Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum, Israel Rachevski","doi":"10.1177/00222194231211947","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194231211947","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined whether there are differences between Israeli students with learning disabilities (LD) and their typically developing peers with regard to their 21st-century skills according to their self-report and whether the differences between the two groups are greater in postsecondary education than in high school-an aim that had not been examined in depth in previous research. Findings suggest that overall (beyond type of learner), in most skills, postsecondary education students reported higher scores than high school students on questionnaires designed for self-assessment of 21st-century skills. Second, students with LD exhibited lower scores in most 21st-century skills than their peers. Third, a comparison of the gaps in 21st-century skills between students with LD and their peers in each of the examined educational settings (i.e., high school vs postsecondary education) revealed that some of the gaps expand over the years, resulting in differences in additional skills. Results are discussed in the context of educational environment and its role in cultivating 21st-century skills and preparing students for integration into the labor market.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"371-383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528966/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92156989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Primary School Teachers' Adaptations for Struggling Writers: Survey Study of Grade 1 to 6 Teachers in Australia. 小学教师对挣扎作家的适应:澳大利亚一至六年级教师调查研究。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-13 DOI: 10.1177/00222194231211946
Anabela Malpique, Deborah Pino-Pasternak, Debora Valcan, Mustafa Asil

Two hundred ninety-eight primary teachers (88% female) from across all Australian states and territories reported on the frequency with which they implemented instructional adaptations for struggling writers in their classrooms. They also rated their preparation and self-efficacy for teaching writing. The majority of participating teachers indicated they provided additional instruction on spelling, capitalization and punctuation, and sentence construction at least once a week or more often. Teachers further reported implementing additional minilessons and reteaching strategies and skills, as well as extra instruction on grammar, handwriting, text structure, revising, and planning on a monthly basis or more often. The majority of teachers reported never or only once a year using adaptations to support digital writing. The frequency with which teachers provided extra instruction on spelling, handwriting, text structure, revising, and computer use differed by grade. Only teachers' perceived efficacy to teach writing made a unique and statistically significant contribution to predicting the use of instructional adaptations for writing and adaptations to support digital writing after controlling for teacher and classroom variables.

来自澳大利亚各州和地区的298名小学教师(88%为女性)报告了他们在课堂上为挣扎的作家实施教学调整的频率。他们还评估了自己在写作教学方面的准备工作和自我效能。大多数参与调查的教师表示,他们每周至少一次或更频繁地提供拼写、大写、标点和句子结构方面的额外指导。教师们还报告说,他们每月或更频繁地实施了额外的小课,重新教授策略和技能,以及语法、手写、文本结构、修改和计划方面的额外指导。大多数教师报告说从未或每年只有一次使用适应工具来支持数字写作。教师在拼写、书写、文本结构、修改和计算机使用方面提供额外指导的频率因年级而异。在控制了教师和课堂变量后,只有教师对写作教学的感知效能对预测写作教学适应和支持数字写作的适应的使用做出了独特的、统计上显著的贡献。
{"title":"Primary School Teachers' Adaptations for Struggling Writers: Survey Study of Grade 1 to 6 Teachers in Australia.","authors":"Anabela Malpique, Deborah Pino-Pasternak, Debora Valcan, Mustafa Asil","doi":"10.1177/00222194231211946","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194231211946","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two hundred ninety-eight primary teachers (88% female) from across all Australian states and territories reported on the frequency with which they implemented instructional adaptations for struggling writers in their classrooms. They also rated their preparation and self-efficacy for teaching writing. The majority of participating teachers indicated they provided additional instruction on spelling, capitalization and punctuation, and sentence construction at least once a week or more often. Teachers further reported implementing additional minilessons and reteaching strategies and skills, as well as extra instruction on grammar, handwriting, text structure, revising, and planning on a monthly basis or more often. The majority of teachers reported never or only once a year using adaptations to support digital writing. The frequency with which teachers provided extra instruction on spelling, handwriting, text structure, revising, and computer use differed by grade. Only teachers' perceived efficacy to teach writing made a unique and statistically significant contribution to predicting the use of instructional adaptations for writing and adaptations to support digital writing after controlling for teacher and classroom variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"384-396"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528971/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92156990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Prevalence of Specific Learning Difficulties in Higher Education: A Study of UK Universities Across 12 Academic Years. 高等教育中特殊学习困难的普遍性:跨越 12 个学年的英国大学研究。
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-10-20 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241281479
Nicola Brunswick,Nathan J Wilson,Ian Kruger,Rebecca Chamberlain,I Christopher McManus
Specific learning and attention difficulties are often first identified in childhood, but they can cause lifelong academic and occupational challenges. We explored the prevalence of these difficulties and the representation of sex and ethnicity amongst all first-year students in UK higher education across 12 years-almost 5.7 million students-and compared course preferences and University destinations of those with and without difficulties. Students declaring learning/attention difficulties were more likely to be White or of Mixed ethnicity and least likely to be Asian. They were more likely to attend specialist HE institutions or newer universities, and more likely to study courses in creative arts and design, agriculture and architecture than law, languages, computer science, and mathematical sciences. The number of students declaring difficulties has increased year on year, in actual terms and as a proportion of the student body, suggesting that efforts to increase diversity and inclusion have been successful. However, differences remain between students with and without learning/attention difficulties in terms of ethnicity, subjects studied, and HE institutions attended, so more needs to be done to identify and address reasons for this. While this paper reports data from UK students, it addresses an international question and invites similar explorations of other national datasets.
特殊学习困难和注意力障碍通常在儿童时期就会被发现,但它们会给学生的学业和职业带来终生的挑战。我们调查了 12 年来英国高等教育中所有一年级新生--近 570 万名学生--中这些困难的发生率以及性别和种族的代表性,并比较了有困难和没有困难的学生的课程偏好和大学去向。宣称有学习/注意力障碍的学生更有可能是白人或混血儿,而亚裔的可能性最小。他们更有可能进入专业高等教育机构或较新的大学,更有可能学习创意艺术与设计、农业与建筑方面的课程,而不是法律、语言、计算机科学和数学科学方面的课程。无论是从实际人数还是从占学生总数的比例来看,申报有困难的学生人数都在逐年增加,这表明为提高多样性和包容性所做的努力取得了成功。然而,在种族、所学科目和就读高等院校方面,有学习/注意力障碍的学生与没有学习/注意力障碍的学生之间仍然存在差异,因此需要做更多的工作来确定和解决造成这种情况的原因。虽然本文报告的是英国学生的数据,但它解决的是一个国际性问题,并邀请对其他国家的数据集进行类似的探索。
{"title":"The Prevalence of Specific Learning Difficulties in Higher Education: A Study of UK Universities Across 12 Academic Years.","authors":"Nicola Brunswick,Nathan J Wilson,Ian Kruger,Rebecca Chamberlain,I Christopher McManus","doi":"10.1177/00222194241281479","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194241281479","url":null,"abstract":"Specific learning and attention difficulties are often first identified in childhood, but they can cause lifelong academic and occupational challenges. We explored the prevalence of these difficulties and the representation of sex and ethnicity amongst all first-year students in UK higher education across 12 years-almost 5.7 million students-and compared course preferences and University destinations of those with and without difficulties. Students declaring learning/attention difficulties were more likely to be White or of Mixed ethnicity and least likely to be Asian. They were more likely to attend specialist HE institutions or newer universities, and more likely to study courses in creative arts and design, agriculture and architecture than law, languages, computer science, and mathematical sciences. The number of students declaring difficulties has increased year on year, in actual terms and as a proportion of the student body, suggesting that efforts to increase diversity and inclusion have been successful. However, differences remain between students with and without learning/attention difficulties in terms of ethnicity, subjects studied, and HE institutions attended, so more needs to be done to identify and address reasons for this. While this paper reports data from UK students, it addresses an international question and invites similar explorations of other national datasets.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"2 1","pages":"222194241281479"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142486257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Prevalence of Specific Learning Difficulties in Higher Education: A Study of UK Universities Across 12 Academic Years. 高等教育中特殊学习困难的普遍性:跨越 12 个学年的英国大学研究。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-10-20 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241281479
Nicola Brunswick, Nathan J Wilson, Ian Kruger, Rebecca Chamberlain, I Christopher McManus

Specific learning and attention difficulties are often first identified in childhood, but they can cause lifelong academic and occupational challenges. We explored the prevalence of these difficulties and the representation of sex and ethnicity amongst all first-year students in UK higher education across 12 years-almost 5.7 million students-and compared course preferences and University destinations of those with and without difficulties. Students declaring learning/attention difficulties were more likely to be White or of Mixed ethnicity and least likely to be Asian. They were more likely to attend specialist HE institutions or newer universities, and more likely to study courses in creative arts and design, agriculture and architecture than law, languages, computer science, and mathematical sciences. The number of students declaring difficulties has increased year on year, in actual terms and as a proportion of the student body, suggesting that efforts to increase diversity and inclusion have been successful. However, differences remain between students with and without learning/attention difficulties in terms of ethnicity, subjects studied, and HE institutions attended, so more needs to be done to identify and address reasons for this. While this paper reports data from UK students, it addresses an international question and invites similar explorations of other national datasets.

特殊学习困难和注意力障碍通常在儿童时期就会被发现,但它们会给学生的学业和职业带来终生的挑战。我们调查了 12 年来英国高等教育中所有一年级新生--近 570 万名学生--中这些困难的发生率以及性别和种族的代表性,并比较了有困难和没有困难的学生的课程偏好和大学去向。宣称有学习/注意力障碍的学生更有可能是白人或混血儿,而亚裔的可能性最小。他们更有可能进入专业高等教育机构或较新的大学,更有可能学习创意艺术与设计、农业与建筑方面的课程,而不是法律、语言、计算机科学和数学科学方面的课程。无论是从实际人数还是从占学生总数的比例来看,申报有困难的学生人数都在逐年增加,这表明为提高多样性和包容性所做的努力取得了成功。然而,在种族、所学科目和就读高等院校方面,有学习/注意力障碍的学生与没有学习/注意力障碍的学生之间仍然存在差异,因此需要做更多的工作来确定和解决造成这种情况的原因。虽然本文报告的是英国学生的数据,但它解决的是一个国际性问题,并邀请对其他国家的数据集进行类似的探索。
{"title":"The Prevalence of Specific Learning Difficulties in Higher Education: A Study of UK Universities Across 12 Academic Years.","authors":"Nicola Brunswick, Nathan J Wilson, Ian Kruger, Rebecca Chamberlain, I Christopher McManus","doi":"10.1177/00222194241281479","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194241281479","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Specific learning and attention difficulties are often first identified in childhood, but they can cause lifelong academic and occupational challenges. We explored the prevalence of these difficulties and the representation of sex and ethnicity amongst all first-year students in UK higher education across 12 years-almost 5.7 million students-and compared course preferences and University destinations of those with and without difficulties. Students declaring learning/attention difficulties were more likely to be White or of Mixed ethnicity and least likely to be Asian. They were more likely to attend specialist HE institutions or newer universities, and more likely to study courses in creative arts and design, agriculture and architecture than law, languages, computer science, and mathematical sciences. The number of students declaring difficulties has increased year on year, in actual terms and as a proportion of the student body, suggesting that efforts to increase diversity and inclusion have been successful. However, differences remain between students with and without learning/attention difficulties in terms of ethnicity, subjects studied, and HE institutions attended, so more needs to be done to identify and address reasons for this. While this paper reports data from UK students, it addresses an international question and invites similar explorations of other national datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"222194241281479"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Global and Local Patterns of Reading-Related Cognitive and Ecological Variables in Chinese First-Grade Children: A Cross-Sectional Network Analysis. 中国一年级儿童与阅读相关的认知和生态变量的全球和地方模式:横断面网络分析
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241283198
Ziqian Wei, Lei Wang, Zhengye Xu, Lirong Luo, Xinyong Zhang, Ning Li, Duo Liu

In the current study, we tested a network model of reading difficulty by using state-of-the-art psychological network analysis. Four hundred and fifty-three Chinese first-grade children (about 38% female, mean age = 7.00, SD = 0.41) were divided into good (n = 154), competent (n = 147), and struggling readers (n = 152) based on their scores of Chinese character reading. The Extended Bayesian Information Criterion graphical lasso (EBICglasso) method was applied to estimate cross-sectional networks for the three groups. Each network included four cognitive nodes (homophone awareness, morphological structure awareness, phonological awareness, and vocabulary) and two ecological nodes (family socioeconomic status and the number of books at home). Chronological age and nonverbal intelligence were also included in the estimated networks. The global (i.e., global structure and global connectivity) and local patterns (i.e., the most important edges and nodes) in each network were reported. The network comparison results showed that global connectivity was significantly lower among struggling readers than for good readers, implying that a holistic impairment of bidirectional connections among multiple variables relates to the difficulty in learning to read. The theoretical and empirical implications and the significance of applying the network approach to reading research are discussed.

在本研究中,我们利用最先进的心理网络分析法测试了阅读困难的网络模型。我们根据 453 名一年级中国儿童(约 38%为女性,平均年龄 = 7.00,SD = 0.41)的汉字阅读得分,将他们分为良好阅读者(n = 154)、胜任阅读者(n = 147)和阅读困难者(n = 152)。研究人员采用扩展贝叶斯信息标准图形套索(EBICglasso)方法估计了三个组别的横截面网络。每个网络包括四个认知节点(同音字意识、形态结构意识、语音意识和词汇量)和两个生态节点(家庭社会经济地位和家中书籍数量)。估计的网络中还包括年龄和非语言智力。报告了每个网络的全局(即全局结构和全局连通性)和局部模式(即最重要的边和节点)。网络比较结果显示,阅读困难者的全局连通性明显低于阅读良好者,这意味着多个变量之间的双向连通性整体受损与阅读学习困难有关。本文讨论了将网络方法应用于阅读研究的理论和实证意义。
{"title":"The Global and Local Patterns of Reading-Related Cognitive and Ecological Variables in Chinese First-Grade Children: A Cross-Sectional Network Analysis.","authors":"Ziqian Wei, Lei Wang, Zhengye Xu, Lirong Luo, Xinyong Zhang, Ning Li, Duo Liu","doi":"10.1177/00222194241283198","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194241283198","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the current study, we tested a network model of reading difficulty by using state-of-the-art psychological network analysis. Four hundred and fifty-three Chinese first-grade children (about 38% female, mean age = 7.00, <i>SD</i> = 0.41) were divided into good (<i>n</i> = 154), competent (<i>n</i> = 147), and struggling readers (<i>n</i> = 152) based on their scores of Chinese character reading. The Extended Bayesian Information Criterion graphical lasso (EBICglasso) method was applied to estimate cross-sectional networks for the three groups. Each network included four cognitive nodes (homophone awareness, morphological structure awareness, phonological awareness, and vocabulary) and two ecological nodes (family socioeconomic status and the number of books at home). Chronological age and nonverbal intelligence were also included in the estimated networks. The global (i.e., global structure and global connectivity) and local patterns (i.e., the most important edges and nodes) in each network were reported. The network comparison results showed that global connectivity was significantly lower among struggling readers than for good readers, implying that a holistic impairment of bidirectional connections among multiple variables relates to the difficulty in learning to read. The theoretical and empirical implications and the significance of applying the network approach to reading research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"222194241283198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142394318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predicting Adolescent Arithmetic and Reading Dysfluency. 预测青少年算术和阅读障碍。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241275644
Tuire Koponen, Kenneth Eklund, Kaisa Aunola, Anna-Maija Poikkeus, Marja-Kristiina Lerkkanen, Minna Torppa

The long-term negative consequences of learning difficulties have been acknowledged. Nonetheless, research is still scarce regarding the prediction of adolescent difficulties in reading and arithmetic skills. The present study examines at which age phase and with what kind of constellation of parent- and child-related factors can adolescent difficulties in arithmetic and/or reading fluency be successfully predicted. A sample of Finnish children (N = 941) was followed from the onset of kindergarten (at age 6) through adolescence (ages 13-16). Children's cognitive skills were assessed in kindergarten, and arithmetic and reading fluency were examined in Grades 2, 4, 6, 7, and 9. Parents' self-report data were collected on their own learning difficulties and educational level. Scoring below the 16th percentile in both Grades 7 and 9 was set as the criterion for dysfluency either in reading (N = 87, 9.2%) or arithmetic (N = 84, 8.9%). Adolescent dysfluency in both domains was moderately predicted by parental measures and kindergarten cognitive skills. Although adding school-age fluency measures clearly increased both the predictability and specificity of models up to Grade 4 for both skills, knowledge of letters' names, counting, and visuospatial skills remained unique predictors of dysfluency in adolescence.

学习困难的长期负面影响已得到公认。然而,有关预测青少年阅读和算术技能困难的研究仍然很少。本研究探讨了在哪个年龄阶段以及与父母和儿童相关的因素组合可以成功预测青少年在算术和/或阅读流利性方面的困难。研究人员对芬兰儿童(941 人)进行了从幼儿园开始(6 岁)到青春期(13-16 岁)的抽样调查。在幼儿园对儿童的认知能力进行了评估,在二年级、四年级、六年级、七年级和九年级对算术和阅读流畅性进行了检查。此外,还收集了家长关于自身学习困难和教育水平的自我报告数据。七年级和九年级学生的阅读(87 人,9.2%)或算术(84 人,8.9%)得分均低于百分位数第 16 位,即为流利程度不良。青少年在这两个领域的流畅性障碍在一定程度上受父母的测量和幼儿园认知技能的影响。虽然增加学龄期流利度测量明显提高了四年级前两种技能模型的可预测性和特异性,但字母名称知识、计数和视觉空间技能仍然是青少年流利障碍的独特预测因素。
{"title":"Predicting Adolescent Arithmetic and Reading Dysfluency.","authors":"Tuire Koponen, Kenneth Eklund, Kaisa Aunola, Anna-Maija Poikkeus, Marja-Kristiina Lerkkanen, Minna Torppa","doi":"10.1177/00222194241275644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194241275644","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The long-term negative consequences of learning difficulties have been acknowledged. Nonetheless, research is still scarce regarding the prediction of adolescent difficulties in reading and arithmetic skills. The present study examines at which age phase and with what kind of constellation of parent- and child-related factors can adolescent difficulties in arithmetic and/or reading fluency be successfully predicted. A sample of Finnish children (<i>N</i> = 941) was followed from the onset of kindergarten (at age 6) through adolescence (ages 13-16). Children's cognitive skills were assessed in kindergarten, and arithmetic and reading fluency were examined in Grades 2, 4, 6, 7, and 9. Parents' self-report data were collected on their own learning difficulties and educational level. Scoring below the 16th percentile in both Grades 7 and 9 was set as the criterion for dysfluency either in reading (<i>N</i> = 87, 9.2%) or arithmetic (<i>N</i> = 84, 8.9%). Adolescent dysfluency in both domains was moderately predicted by parental measures and kindergarten cognitive skills. Although adding school-age fluency measures clearly increased both the predictability and specificity of models up to Grade 4 for both skills, knowledge of letters' names, counting, and visuospatial skills remained unique predictors of dysfluency in adolescence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"222194241275644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142308791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Learning Disabilities
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1