首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Learning Disabilities最新文献

英文 中文
Teaching Constant Rate-of-Change Problem-Solving to Secondary Students With or at Risk of Learning Disabilities. 向有学习障碍或有学习障碍风险的中学生教授恒定变化率问题解决方法。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241254094
Kaitlin Bundock, Gregory Callan, Maryellen Brunson McClain, Chandler M Benney, David N Longhurst, Kristen R Rolf

Rate of change (i.e., slope) is a critical mathematics concept for success in everyday life, academics, and professional careers. Students with or at risk of learning disabilities struggle with solving rate-of-change problems, especially word problems. Interventions that incorporate representations and problem-solving strategies are effective for improving the word problem-solving performance of students with disabilities. This multiple-probe, multiple-baseline, single-case design study evaluated the effects of an intervention that included an integrated, concrete-representational-abstract teaching framework with an embedded problem-solving strategy (POD Check) on students' rate-of-change word problem-solving performance. The intervention was delivered virtually via video conferencing technology. Four middle- and high-school students with or at risk of mathematics learning disabilities in the U.S. Intermountain West region participated in the intervention. Results indicate evidence of a functional relation between the intervention and students' word problem-solving performance, and effects were maintained 2-4 weeks after the intervention. The findings of this study provide implications for mathematics intervention research and practice for students with learning disabilities.

变化率(即斜率)是日常生活、学业和职业成功的关键数学概念。有学习障碍或有学习障碍风险的学生在解决变化率问题,尤其是文字问题时非常吃力。结合表象和问题解决策略的干预措施可有效提高残疾学生解决文字问题的成绩。这项多探究、多基线、单案例设计的研究评估了一种干预措施对学生变化率文字问题解决能力的影响,这种干预措施包括一个综合的、具体-表象-抽象的教学框架,其中包含一种解决问题的策略(POD 检查)。该干预通过视频会议技术以虚拟方式进行。美国西部山区四名有或可能有数学学习障碍的初中和高中学生参与了干预。结果表明,干预与学生的单词问题解决能力之间存在功能关系,干预后 2-4 周,效果得以保持。本研究的结果为针对学习障碍学生的数学干预研究和实践提供了启示。
{"title":"Teaching Constant Rate-of-Change Problem-Solving to Secondary Students With or at Risk of Learning Disabilities.","authors":"Kaitlin Bundock, Gregory Callan, Maryellen Brunson McClain, Chandler M Benney, David N Longhurst, Kristen R Rolf","doi":"10.1177/00222194241254094","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194241254094","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rate of change (i.e., slope) is a critical mathematics concept for success in everyday life, academics, and professional careers. Students with or at risk of learning disabilities struggle with solving rate-of-change problems, especially word problems. Interventions that incorporate representations and problem-solving strategies are effective for improving the word problem-solving performance of students with disabilities. This multiple-probe, multiple-baseline, single-case design study evaluated the effects of an intervention that included an integrated, concrete-representational-abstract teaching framework with an embedded problem-solving strategy (POD Check) on students' rate-of-change word problem-solving performance. The intervention was delivered virtually via video conferencing technology. Four middle- and high-school students with or at risk of mathematics learning disabilities in the U.S. Intermountain West region participated in the intervention. Results indicate evidence of a functional relation between the intervention and students' word problem-solving performance, and effects were maintained 2-4 weeks after the intervention. The findings of this study provide implications for mathematics intervention research and practice for students with learning disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"210-224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141071933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concept-Focused and Procedure-Focused Instruction on the Algebra Performance of Grade 9 Students With and Without Mathematics Difficulty. 以概念为重点的教学和以程序为重点的教学对有数学困难和没有数学困难的九年级学生代数成绩的影响。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-18 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241249960
Jihyun Lee

Developing both conceptual and procedural knowledge is important for students' mathematics competence. This study examined whether U.S. Grade 9 general education mathematics teachers' self-reported use of concept-focused instruction (CFI) and procedure-focused instruction (PFI) were associated differently with ninth graders' algebra achievement after 2.5 years, depending on students' mathematics difficulty (MD) status. Data for this study were drawn from the High School Longitudinal Study for the years 2009-2010 and 2011-2012 (N = 19,104). Multiple regression analyses indicated that students with MD who participated in Grade 9 mathematics classrooms where teachers self-reported the use of less CFI and more PFI were more positively associated with having higher algebra achievement after 2.5 years. Conversely, students without MD in classrooms where mathematics teachers self-reported the use of more CFI and less PFI were positively associated with having higher algebra achievement after 2.5 years. However, this study's findings do not suggest that teachers should disregard CFI and provide only PFI when teaching students with MD. Because the data set did not include any variable to discover whether teachers provided sufficient support (i.e., evidence-based practices) for students with MD, who have more constraints in their cognitive skills compared to students without MD, to benefit from CFI, the findings of this study should be interpreted cautiously. Directions for future research and practical implications are discussed.

发展概念性和程序性知识对学生的数学能力非常重要。本研究考察了九年级普通教育数学教师自我报告的 "以概念为中心的教学(CFI)"和 "以程序为中心的教学(PFI)"的使用情况,是否会因学生的数学困难(MD)状况而与两年半后九年级学生的代数成绩产生不同的关联。本研究的数据来自 2009-2010 年和 2011-2012 年的高中纵向研究(N = 19104)。多元回归分析表明,在教师自我报告使用较少CFI和较多PFI的九年级数学课堂中,有MD的学生与2.5年后代数成绩的提高有更大的正相关。相反,在数学教师自我报告使用较多 CFI 和较少 PFI 的课堂中,没有患 MD 的学生与 2.5 年后代数成绩的提高呈正相关。然而,本研究的结果并不表明,教师在教授患有 MD 的学生时应忽略 CFI 而只提供 PFI。由于数据集没有包含任何变量来发现教师是否为患有 MD 的学生提供了足够的支持(即以证据为基础的实践),以让他们从 CFI 中获益。本文讨论了未来研究的方向和实际意义。
{"title":"Concept-Focused and Procedure-Focused Instruction on the Algebra Performance of Grade 9 Students With and Without Mathematics Difficulty.","authors":"Jihyun Lee","doi":"10.1177/00222194241249960","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194241249960","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Developing both conceptual and procedural knowledge is important for students' mathematics competence. This study examined whether U.S. Grade 9 general education mathematics teachers' self-reported use of concept-focused instruction (CFI) and procedure-focused instruction (PFI) were associated differently with ninth graders' algebra achievement after 2.5 years, depending on students' mathematics difficulty (MD) status. Data for this study were drawn from the High School Longitudinal Study for the years 2009-2010 and 2011-2012 (<i>N</i> = 19,104). Multiple regression analyses indicated that students with MD who participated in Grade 9 mathematics classrooms where teachers self-reported the use of less CFI and more PFI were more positively associated with having higher algebra achievement after 2.5 years. Conversely, students without MD in classrooms where mathematics teachers self-reported the use of more CFI and less PFI were positively associated with having higher algebra achievement after 2.5 years. However, this study's findings do not suggest that teachers should disregard CFI and provide only PFI when teaching students with MD. Because the data set did not include any variable to discover whether teachers provided sufficient support (i.e., evidence-based practices) for students with MD, who have more constraints in their cognitive skills compared to students without MD, to benefit from CFI, the findings of this study should be interpreted cautiously. Directions for future research and practical implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"192-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140960127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predicting Adolescent Arithmetic and Reading Dysfluency. 预测青少年算术和阅读障碍。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241275644
Tuire Koponen, Kenneth Eklund, Kaisa Aunola, Anna-Maija Poikkeus, Marja-Kristiina Lerkkanen, Minna Torppa

The long-term negative consequences of learning difficulties have been acknowledged. Nonetheless, research is still scarce regarding the prediction of adolescent difficulties in reading and arithmetic skills. The present study examines at which age phase and with what kind of constellation of parent- and child-related factors can adolescent difficulties in arithmetic and/or reading fluency be successfully predicted. A sample of Finnish children (N = 941) was followed from the onset of kindergarten (at age 6) through adolescence (ages 13-16). Children's cognitive skills were assessed in kindergarten, and arithmetic and reading fluency were examined in Grades 2, 4, 6, 7, and 9. Parents' self-report data were collected on their own learning difficulties and educational level. Scoring below the 16th percentile in both Grades 7 and 9 was set as the criterion for dysfluency either in reading (n = 87, 9.2%) or arithmetic (n = 84, 8.9%). Adolescent dysfluency in both domains was moderately predicted by parental measures and kindergarten cognitive skills. Although adding school-age fluency measures clearly increased both the predictability and specificity of models up to Grade 4 for both skills, knowledge of letters' names, counting, and visuospatial skills remained unique predictors of dysfluency in adolescence.

学习困难的长期负面影响已得到公认。然而,有关预测青少年阅读和算术技能困难的研究仍然很少。本研究探讨了在哪个年龄阶段以及与父母和儿童相关的因素组合可以成功预测青少年在算术和/或阅读流利性方面的困难。研究人员对芬兰儿童(941 人)进行了从幼儿园开始(6 岁)到青春期(13-16 岁)的抽样调查。在幼儿园对儿童的认知能力进行了评估,在二年级、四年级、六年级、七年级和九年级对算术和阅读流畅性进行了检查。此外,还收集了家长关于自身学习困难和教育水平的自我报告数据。七年级和九年级学生的阅读(87 人,9.2%)或算术(84 人,8.9%)得分均低于百分位数第 16 位,即为流利程度不良。青少年在这两个领域的流畅性障碍在一定程度上受父母的测量和幼儿园认知技能的影响。虽然增加学龄期流利度测量明显提高了四年级前两种技能模型的可预测性和特异性,但字母名称知识、计数和视觉空间技能仍然是青少年流利障碍的独特预测因素。
{"title":"Predicting Adolescent Arithmetic and Reading Dysfluency.","authors":"Tuire Koponen, Kenneth Eklund, Kaisa Aunola, Anna-Maija Poikkeus, Marja-Kristiina Lerkkanen, Minna Torppa","doi":"10.1177/00222194241275644","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194241275644","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The long-term negative consequences of learning difficulties have been acknowledged. Nonetheless, research is still scarce regarding the prediction of adolescent difficulties in reading and arithmetic skills. The present study examines at which age phase and with what kind of constellation of parent- and child-related factors can adolescent difficulties in arithmetic and/or reading fluency be successfully predicted. A sample of Finnish children (<i>N</i> = 941) was followed from the onset of kindergarten (at age 6) through adolescence (ages 13-16). Children's cognitive skills were assessed in kindergarten, and arithmetic and reading fluency were examined in Grades 2, 4, 6, 7, and 9. Parents' self-report data were collected on their own learning difficulties and educational level. Scoring below the 16th percentile in both Grades 7 and 9 was set as the criterion for dysfluency either in reading (<i>n</i> = 87, 9.2%) or arithmetic (<i>n</i> = 84, 8.9%). Adolescent dysfluency in both domains was moderately predicted by parental measures and kindergarten cognitive skills. Although adding school-age fluency measures clearly increased both the predictability and specificity of models up to Grade 4 for both skills, knowledge of letters' names, counting, and visuospatial skills remained unique predictors of dysfluency in adolescence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"163-178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11993818/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142308791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Prevalence of Specific Learning Difficulties in Higher Education: A Study of UK Universities Across 12 Academic Years. 高等教育中特殊学习困难的普遍性:跨越 12 个学年的英国大学研究。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-20 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241281479
Nicola Brunswick, Nathan J Wilson, Ian Kruger, Rebecca Chamberlain, I Christopher McManus

Specific learning and attention difficulties are often first identified in childhood, but they can cause lifelong academic and occupational challenges. We explored the prevalence of these difficulties and the representation of sex and ethnicity amongst all first-year students in United Kingdom (UK) higher education (HE) across 12 years-almost 5.7 million students-and compared course preferences and university destinations of those with and without difficulties. Students declaring learning/attention difficulties were more likely to be White or of Mixed ethnicity and least likely to be Asian. They were more likely to attend specialist HE institutions or newer universities, and more likely to study courses in creative arts and design, agriculture and architecture than law, languages, computer science, and mathematical sciences. The number of students declaring difficulties has increased year on year, in actual terms and as a proportion of the student body, suggesting that efforts to increase diversity and inclusion have been successful. However, differences remain between students with and without learning/attention difficulties in terms of ethnicity, subjects studied, and HE institutions attended, so more needs to be done to identify and address reasons for this. While this paper reports data from UK students, it addresses an international question and invites similar explorations of other national datasets.

特殊学习困难和注意力障碍通常在儿童时期就会被发现,但它们会给学生的学业和职业带来终生的挑战。我们调查了 12 年来英国高等教育中所有一年级新生--近 570 万名学生--中这些困难的发生率以及性别和种族的代表性,并比较了有困难和没有困难的学生的课程偏好和大学去向。宣称有学习/注意力障碍的学生更有可能是白人或混血儿,而亚裔的可能性最小。他们更有可能进入专业高等教育机构或较新的大学,更有可能学习创意艺术与设计、农业与建筑方面的课程,而不是法律、语言、计算机科学和数学科学方面的课程。无论是从实际人数还是从占学生总数的比例来看,申报有困难的学生人数都在逐年增加,这表明为提高多样性和包容性所做的努力取得了成功。然而,在种族、所学科目和就读高等院校方面,有学习/注意力障碍的学生与没有学习/注意力障碍的学生之间仍然存在差异,因此需要做更多的工作来确定和解决造成这种情况的原因。虽然本文报告的是英国学生的数据,但它解决的是一个国际性问题,并邀请对其他国家的数据集进行类似的探索。
{"title":"The Prevalence of Specific Learning Difficulties in Higher Education: A Study of UK Universities Across 12 Academic Years.","authors":"Nicola Brunswick, Nathan J Wilson, Ian Kruger, Rebecca Chamberlain, I Christopher McManus","doi":"10.1177/00222194241281479","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194241281479","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Specific learning and attention difficulties are often first identified in childhood, but they can cause lifelong academic and occupational challenges. We explored the prevalence of these difficulties and the representation of sex and ethnicity amongst all first-year students in United Kingdom (UK) higher education (HE) across 12 years-almost 5.7 million students-and compared course preferences and university destinations of those with and without difficulties. Students declaring learning/attention difficulties were more likely to be White or of Mixed ethnicity and least likely to be Asian. They were more likely to attend specialist HE institutions or newer universities, and more likely to study courses in creative arts and design, agriculture and architecture than law, languages, computer science, and mathematical sciences. The number of students declaring difficulties has increased year on year, in actual terms and as a proportion of the student body, suggesting that efforts to increase diversity and inclusion have been successful. However, differences remain between students with and without learning/attention difficulties in terms of ethnicity, subjects studied, and HE institutions attended, so more needs to be done to identify and address reasons for this. While this paper reports data from UK students, it addresses an international question and invites similar explorations of other national datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"179-191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do Children With Comorbid Reading and Mathematics Difficulties Experience More Internalizing Problems? 同时患有阅读和数学困难的儿童会经历更多的内化问题吗?
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-04-28 DOI: 10.1177/00222194251335313
Ana Paula Alves Vieira, George K. Georgiou, Yuliya Kotelnikova
We examined whether children with comorbid reading (RD) and mathematics (MD) difficulties experience more internalizing problems (anxiety, depression, somatic complaints, and social withdrawal) than children without comorbidity. In addition, we examined whether any significant group differences are due to differences between groups in attention. Thirty-three children with RD (51.5% female; M age = 10.80 years), 35 with MD (60.0% female; M age = 10.79 years), 37 with comorbid RDMD (45.9% female; M age = 10.79 years), and 42 chronological-age (CA) controls (64.3% female; M age = 10.82 years) were assessed on reading, mathematics, general cognitive ability, and attention tasks. Their teachers also rated their anxiety, depression, somatic complaints, and social withdrawal. Results of analyses of variance showed that children with comorbid RDMD exhibited significantly higher levels of anxiety and depression compared only to the CA controls. However, after controlling for attention, these group differences were no longer significant. These findings suggest that children with comorbid RDMD may be at greater risk for anxiety and depression, although attention difficulties likely contribute to these differences.
我们研究了患有阅读(RD)和数学(MD)共病的儿童是否比没有共病的儿童有更多的内化问题(焦虑、抑郁、躯体抱怨和社交退缩)。此外,我们检查了是否有任何显著的组间差异是由于组间的注意差异。RD患儿33例(女性51.5%;M年龄= 10.80岁),35例MD(女性60.0%;年龄10.79岁),37例合并RDMD(45.9%为女性;M年龄= 10.79岁),42例时间年龄(CA)对照(64.3%女性;(年龄= 10.82岁)在阅读、数学、一般认知能力和注意力任务方面进行评估。他们的老师还对他们的焦虑、抑郁、身体不适和社交退缩进行了评分。方差分析的结果显示,与CA对照组相比,合并rdd的儿童表现出明显更高的焦虑和抑郁水平。然而,在控制了注意力之后,这些组间差异不再显著。这些发现表明,尽管注意力困难可能是造成这些差异的原因之一,但患有rmdd合并症的儿童患焦虑和抑郁的风险可能更大。
{"title":"Do Children With Comorbid Reading and Mathematics Difficulties Experience More Internalizing Problems?","authors":"Ana Paula Alves Vieira, George K. Georgiou, Yuliya Kotelnikova","doi":"10.1177/00222194251335313","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194251335313","url":null,"abstract":"We examined whether children with comorbid reading (RD) and mathematics (MD) difficulties experience more internalizing problems (anxiety, depression, somatic complaints, and social withdrawal) than children without comorbidity. In addition, we examined whether any significant group differences are due to differences between groups in attention. Thirty-three children with RD (51.5% female; <jats:italic>M</jats:italic> <jats:sub>age</jats:sub> = 10.80 years), 35 with MD (60.0% female; <jats:italic>M</jats:italic> <jats:sub>age</jats:sub> = 10.79 years), 37 with comorbid RDMD (45.9% female; <jats:italic>M</jats:italic> <jats:sub>age</jats:sub> = 10.79 years), and 42 chronological-age (CA) controls (64.3% female; <jats:italic>M</jats:italic> <jats:sub>age</jats:sub> = 10.82 years) were assessed on reading, mathematics, general cognitive ability, and attention tasks. Their teachers also rated their anxiety, depression, somatic complaints, and social withdrawal. Results of analyses of variance showed that children with comorbid RDMD exhibited significantly higher levels of anxiety and depression compared only to the CA controls. However, after controlling for attention, these group differences were no longer significant. These findings suggest that children with comorbid RDMD may be at greater risk for anxiety and depression, although attention difficulties likely contribute to these differences.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143884364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying Emergent Bilinguals at Risk for Reading Difficulties: A Systematic Review of Criterion-Validity of Existing Assessments 识别有阅读困难风险的新兴双语者:现有评估标准效度的系统回顾
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-04-17 DOI: 10.1177/00222194251331533
Jialin Lai, Marianne Rice, Juan F. Quinonez-Beltran, Ramona T. Pittman, R. Malatesha Joshi
Existing language and literacy assessments have been widely validated and applied among monolingual students to identify those at risk for difficulties in reading, yet for emergent bilingual students (EBs), the effectiveness of current assessments to identify potential reading difficulties remains unknown. The present systematic review aimed to examine the criterion validity of assessments conducted among EBs to predict reading achievement in their second language (L2), in addition to the status quo of research methods (i.e., participant and assessment characteristics). A literature search yielded 23 studies that targeted preschool to fifth-grade EBs. Results suggest that decoding, reading fluency, and phonological awareness assessments presented close to satisfactory evidence of criterion validity, whereas assessments of other skills, such as reading comprehension, rapid automatized naming, letter knowledge, and verbal memory, showed weaker validity. Included studies showed homogenous profiles of EBs, indicating a lack of evidence for EBs from various language backgrounds. Existing assessments involved various domains of literacy, including code-related skills, oral language, and domain-general cognitive skills. These assessments also varied across aspects of standardization and language of administration. Limitations and suggestions for future research are discussed.
现有的语言和读写能力评估已经在单语学生中得到了广泛的验证和应用,以识别那些有阅读困难风险的学生,但对于新兴双语学生(EBs),目前的评估在识别潜在阅读困难方面的有效性仍然未知。本系统综述旨在检验在EBs中进行的预测其第二语言阅读成绩的评估的标准效度,以及研究方法的现状(即参与者和评估特征)。一项文献检索得出了23项针对学龄前至五年级EBs的研究。结果表明,解码、阅读流畅性和语音意识评估的效度接近令人满意的证据,而其他技能的评估,如阅读理解、快速自动命名、字母知识和言语记忆的效度较弱。纳入的研究显示,EBs的特征是同质的,这表明缺乏证据表明EBs来自不同的语言背景。现有的评估涉及读写能力的各个领域,包括代码相关技能、口头语言和领域一般认知技能。这些评估在标准化和行政语言方面也各不相同。讨论了今后研究的局限性和建议。
{"title":"Identifying Emergent Bilinguals at Risk for Reading Difficulties: A Systematic Review of Criterion-Validity of Existing Assessments","authors":"Jialin Lai, Marianne Rice, Juan F. Quinonez-Beltran, Ramona T. Pittman, R. Malatesha Joshi","doi":"10.1177/00222194251331533","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194251331533","url":null,"abstract":"Existing language and literacy assessments have been widely validated and applied among monolingual students to identify those at risk for difficulties in reading, yet for emergent bilingual students (EBs), the effectiveness of current assessments to identify potential reading difficulties remains unknown. The present systematic review aimed to examine the criterion validity of assessments conducted among EBs to predict reading achievement in their second language (L2), in addition to the status quo of research methods (i.e., participant and assessment characteristics). A literature search yielded 23 studies that targeted preschool to fifth-grade EBs. Results suggest that decoding, reading fluency, and phonological awareness assessments presented close to satisfactory evidence of criterion validity, whereas assessments of other skills, such as reading comprehension, rapid automatized naming, letter knowledge, and verbal memory, showed weaker validity. Included studies showed homogenous profiles of EBs, indicating a lack of evidence for EBs from various language backgrounds. Existing assessments involved various domains of literacy, including code-related skills, oral language, and domain-general cognitive skills. These assessments also varied across aspects of standardization and language of administration. Limitations and suggestions for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143841239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of Diagnostic Labels for Students With Learning Problems on Teachers’ Stereotypes and Performance Expectations 学习有问题学生的诊断标签对教师的成见和成绩预期的影响
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI: 10.1177/00222194251315187
Linda Kashikar, Timo Lüke, Michael Grosche
Labeling students with learning problems may change teachers’ evaluations of them. Our study examined whether the “Special Learning Needs” (SLN) and “Learning Disability” (LD) labels influenced teachers’ beliefs that the diagnosis was correct and activated a low-competence stereotype. We examined whether this stereotype lowered teachers’ performance expectations and teaching intentions. N = 413 general and special education teachers were randomly assigned to the control (no label) or one of the experimental groups (SLN/LD label). All teachers read the description of a fictitious student with learning problems. Only in the experimental groups was the student labeled with an LD or SLN. Results showed that both labels increased teachers’ acceptance of the diagnosis as accurate. However, the labels did not change teachers’ stereotypes of the fictitious student. The LD label lowered some of teachers’ long-term performance expectations, resulting in more track recommendations to a special school. Unexpectedly, the SLN label increased the intention to foster the student’s academic performance. Some performance expectations of special education teachers were lower than those of general education teachers, which did not manifest in different teaching intentions. The findings are discussed in the context of the Dilemma of Difference.
给有学习问题的学生贴标签可能会改变教师对他们的评价。我们的研究考察了 "特殊学习需要"(SLN)和 "学习障碍"(LD)标签是否会影响教师对诊断正确性的信念,并激活低能力的刻板印象。我们研究了这种刻板印象是否降低了教师的绩效预期和教学意图。N = 413 名普通和特殊教育教师被随机分配到对照组(无标签)或实验组(SLN/LD 标签)。所有教师都阅读了对一名有学习问题的虚构学生的描述。只有实验组的学生被贴上了 LD 或 SLN 标签。结果显示,这两种标签都提高了教师对诊断准确性的认可度。然而,标签并没有改变教师对虚构学生的刻板印象。LD 标签降低了一些教师对学生长期表现的期望,从而导致向特殊学校推荐更多的学生。出乎意料的是,SLN 标签增加了培养学生学业成绩的意愿。特殊教育教师的一些绩效预期低于普通教育教师,但这并没有表现为不同的教学意向。研究结果在 "差异困境 "的背景下进行了讨论。
{"title":"Effects of Diagnostic Labels for Students With Learning Problems on Teachers’ Stereotypes and Performance Expectations","authors":"Linda Kashikar, Timo Lüke, Michael Grosche","doi":"10.1177/00222194251315187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194251315187","url":null,"abstract":"Labeling students with learning problems may change teachers’ evaluations of them. Our study examined whether the “Special Learning Needs” (SLN) and “Learning Disability” (LD) labels influenced teachers’ beliefs that the diagnosis was correct and activated a low-competence stereotype. We examined whether this stereotype lowered teachers’ performance expectations and teaching intentions. <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 413 general and special education teachers were randomly assigned to the control (no label) or one of the experimental groups (SLN/LD label). All teachers read the description of a fictitious student with learning problems. Only in the experimental groups was the student labeled with an LD or SLN. Results showed that both labels increased teachers’ acceptance of the diagnosis as accurate. However, the labels did not change teachers’ stereotypes of the fictitious student. The LD label lowered some of teachers’ long-term performance expectations, resulting in more track recommendations to a special school. Unexpectedly, the SLN label increased the intention to foster the student’s academic performance. Some performance expectations of special education teachers were lower than those of general education teachers, which did not manifest in different teaching intentions. The findings are discussed in the context of the Dilemma of Difference.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143635666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Considerations for Intensifying Word-Problem Interventions for Students With MD: A Qualitative Umbrella Review of Relevant Meta-Analyses. 加强对患有 MD 的学生进行单词问题干预的考虑因素:相关 Meta 分析的定性总回顾。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-06 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241281293
Jonte A Myers, Tessa L Arsenault, Sarah R Powell, Bradley S Witzel, Emily Tanner, Terri D Pigott

Word problem-solving (WPS) poses a significant challenge for many students, particularly those with mathematics difficulties (MD), hindering their overall mathematical development. To improve WPS proficiency, providing individualized and intensive interventions is critical. This umbrella review examined 11 medium- to high-quality meta-analyses to identify intervention and participant characteristics, informed by the Taxonomy of Intervention Intensity (TII) framework, that consistently moderate WPS outcomes for students with MD. Our analysis identified four characteristics with consistent moderating effects: intervention model, number of treatment sessions, group size, and academic risk area. This result suggests that these variables are potential considerations when customizing and intensifying WPS interventions to maximize their effectiveness for students with MD. We discuss the implications of these findings for practice and research and acknowledge the limitations of our review.

文字解题(WPS)对许多学生,尤其是数学困难学生(MD)构成了巨大的挑战,阻碍了他们的整体数学发展。要提高 WPS 能力,提供个性化的强化干预措施至关重要。本综述对 11 项中高级荟萃分析进行了研究,以确定干预强度分类法(TII)框架下的干预和参与者特征,这些特征对有数学障碍的学生的 WPS 结果具有持续的调节作用。我们的分析确定了四个具有一致调节作用的特征:干预模式、治疗次数、小组规模和学业风险领域。这一结果表明,在定制和强化 WPS 干预措施以最大限度地提高其对患有 MD 的学生的有效性时,这些变量是潜在的考虑因素。我们讨论了这些发现对实践和研究的影响,并承认我们的综述存在局限性。
{"title":"Considerations for Intensifying Word-Problem Interventions for Students With MD: A Qualitative Umbrella Review of Relevant Meta-Analyses.","authors":"Jonte A Myers, Tessa L Arsenault, Sarah R Powell, Bradley S Witzel, Emily Tanner, Terri D Pigott","doi":"10.1177/00222194241281293","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194241281293","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Word problem-solving (WPS) poses a significant challenge for many students, particularly those with mathematics difficulties (MD), hindering their overall mathematical development. To improve WPS proficiency, providing individualized and intensive interventions is critical. This umbrella review examined 11 medium- to high-quality meta-analyses to identify intervention and participant characteristics, informed by the Taxonomy of Intervention Intensity (TII) framework, that consistently moderate WPS outcomes for students with MD. Our analysis identified four characteristics with consistent moderating effects: intervention model, number of treatment sessions, group size, and academic risk area. This result suggests that these variables are potential considerations when customizing and intensifying WPS interventions to maximize their effectiveness for students with MD. We discuss the implications of these findings for practice and research and acknowledge the limitations of our review.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"83-111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142592095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do Mathematics and Reading Skills Impact Student Science Outcomes? 数学和阅读能力会影响学生的科学成果吗?
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241263646
Christian T Doabler, Megan Rojo, Jenna A Gersib, Anna-Maria Fall, Maria A Longhi, Gail E Lovette, Greg Roberts, Jasmine Uy, Katharina Johnson, Shadi Ghafghazi, Jason B Phelps, Sarah R Powell, William J Therrien

Establishing validated science programs for students with or at risk for learning disabilities requires testing treatment effects and exploring differential response patterns. This study explored whether students' initial mathematics and reading skills influenced their treatment response to a whole-class, second-grade science program called Scientific Explorers (Sci2). The original Sci2 study employed a cluster randomized controlled design and included 294 U.S. students from 18 second-grade classrooms. Differential effects of the program by initial mathematics and reading skill levels were not observed for an interactive science assessment and a distal science outcome measure. However, based on initial reading skill levels, moderation results were found on a science vocabulary measure, suggesting the effects of Sci2 were greatest for students with higher initial reading skills. Similar results were found using initial mathematics skill levels as a predictor of differential response such that students with higher mathematics skills reaped stronger treatment effects on the vocabulary measure. Further, we found initial mathematics skills also influenced outcomes on the proximal science content assessment, where students with higher initial mathematics skills led to higher outcomes. Overall, findings suggest Sci2 produced robust effects for all students (g = 0.24-1.23), regardless of initial skill proficiencies. Implications for exploring differential response in science intervention research are discussed.

要为有学习障碍或有学习障碍风险的学生制定有效的科学课程,需要测试治疗效果并探索不同的反应模式。本研究探讨了学生最初的数学和阅读技能是否会影响他们对名为 "科学探索者"(Sci2)的二年级全班科学课程的治疗反应。最初的 Sci2 研究采用了分组随机对照设计,包括来自 18 个二年级班级的 294 名学生。在互动式科学评估和远距离科学结果测量中,没有观察到该课程对初始数学和阅读技能水平的不同影响。然而,根据最初的阅读技能水平,在科学词汇量测量中发现了调节结果,表明 Sci2 对最初阅读技能较高的学生的影响最大。使用初始数学技能水平作为差异反应的预测因子也发现了类似的结果,即数学技能较高的学生在词汇量测量上获得了更强的治疗效果。此外,我们还发现,初始数学技能也会影响近似科学内容评估的结果,初始数学技能较高的学生会获得更高的结果。总之,研究结果表明,无论初始技能熟练程度如何,Sci2 对所有学生都产生了强有力的效果(g = 0.24-1.23)。本文讨论了在科学干预研究中探索差异反应的意义。
{"title":"Do Mathematics and Reading Skills Impact Student Science Outcomes?","authors":"Christian T Doabler, Megan Rojo, Jenna A Gersib, Anna-Maria Fall, Maria A Longhi, Gail E Lovette, Greg Roberts, Jasmine Uy, Katharina Johnson, Shadi Ghafghazi, Jason B Phelps, Sarah R Powell, William J Therrien","doi":"10.1177/00222194241263646","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194241263646","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Establishing validated science programs for students with or at risk for learning disabilities requires testing treatment effects and exploring differential response patterns. This study explored whether students' initial mathematics and reading skills influenced their treatment response to a whole-class, second-grade science program called Scientific Explorers (Sci2). The original Sci2 study employed a cluster randomized controlled design and included 294 U.S. students from 18 second-grade classrooms. Differential effects of the program by initial mathematics and reading skill levels were not observed for an interactive science assessment and a distal science outcome measure. However, based on initial reading skill levels, moderation results were found on a science vocabulary measure, suggesting the effects of Sci2 were greatest for students with higher initial reading skills. Similar results were found using initial mathematics skill levels as a predictor of differential response such that students with higher mathematics skills reaped stronger treatment effects on the vocabulary measure. Further, we found initial mathematics skills also influenced outcomes on the proximal science content assessment, where students with higher initial mathematics skills led to higher outcomes. Overall, findings suggest Sci2 produced robust effects for all students (<i>g</i> = 0.24-1.23), regardless of initial skill proficiencies. Implications for exploring differential response in science intervention research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"128-143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829498/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141761748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Specificity, Co-Occurrence, and Growth: Math and Reading Skill Development in Children With Learning Disabilities 特异性、共现性和成长:学习障碍儿童的数学和阅读技能发展
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241312189
Katherine Helene Connors, Emily L. Guertin, Melissa Nichol, Joan M. Bosson-Heenan, Jeffrey R. Gruen, Jan C. Frijters
Learning disabilities are challenging to characterize because they evolve throughout development, frequently co-occur, and have varying domain specificity. Addressing these challenges, we analyzed longitudinal patterns of growth, co-occurrence, and specificity manifesting in the math and reading skills of children with and without learning disabilities. With a sample of 498 Grade 1 children followed for 5 years, we used linear mixed-effects models to explore group-level differences among children with math disability (MD), reading disability (RD), co-occurring disability, and no disability. Findings revealed: Math and reading trajectories of children with learning disabilities parallel those of children without disabilities. Skill growth slows over time, regardless of skill level, suggesting disability-related impairments will not resolve without intervention. Impairment levels and growth trajectories of children with co-occurring disabilities match the within-domain patterns of children with isolated disabilities, supporting a longitudinally maintained additive model of co-occurrence. MD and RD show varying specificity. MD impairments are domain-specific and become more pronounced over time. RD impairments impact both domains early, become more domain-specific over time, but maintain curriculum-contingent math deficits. Findings suggest early math intervention should balance linguistic and conceptual support, as the source of a child’s math difficulties may not be clear until well into elementary school.
学习障碍的特征是具有挑战性的,因为它们在整个开发过程中不断发展,经常共同发生,并且具有不同的领域特异性。为了应对这些挑战,我们分析了有学习障碍和没有学习障碍的儿童在数学和阅读技能方面的纵向增长模式、共现模式和特异性。以498名一年级儿童为样本,随访5年,采用线性混合效应模型探讨数学障碍(MD)、阅读障碍(RD)、共患障碍和无残疾儿童的群体水平差异。研究结果表明:学习障碍儿童的数学和阅读轨迹与非学习障碍儿童相似。无论技能水平如何,技能增长都会随着时间的推移而放缓,这表明,如果没有干预,与残疾相关的缺陷将无法解决。共发残疾儿童的损伤水平和生长轨迹与孤立性残疾儿童的域内模式相匹配,支持纵向维持共发的加性模型。MD和RD表现出不同的特异性。MD损伤是特定领域的,随着时间的推移会变得更加明显。认知障碍在早期就会影响到这两个领域,随着时间的推移会变得更加特定于领域,但会保持与课程相关的数学缺陷。研究结果表明,早期数学干预应该平衡语言和概念支持,因为孩子的数学困难的来源可能要到小学才会清楚。
{"title":"Specificity, Co-Occurrence, and Growth: Math and Reading Skill Development in Children With Learning Disabilities","authors":"Katherine Helene Connors, Emily L. Guertin, Melissa Nichol, Joan M. Bosson-Heenan, Jeffrey R. Gruen, Jan C. Frijters","doi":"10.1177/00222194241312189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194241312189","url":null,"abstract":"Learning disabilities are challenging to characterize because they evolve throughout development, frequently co-occur, and have varying domain specificity. Addressing these challenges, we analyzed longitudinal patterns of growth, co-occurrence, and specificity manifesting in the math and reading skills of children with and without learning disabilities. With a sample of 498 Grade 1 children followed for 5 years, we used linear mixed-effects models to explore group-level differences among children with math disability (MD), reading disability (RD), co-occurring disability, and no disability. Findings revealed: Math and reading trajectories of children with learning disabilities parallel those of children without disabilities. Skill growth slows over time, regardless of skill level, suggesting disability-related impairments will not resolve without intervention. Impairment levels and growth trajectories of children with co-occurring disabilities match the within-domain patterns of children with isolated disabilities, supporting a longitudinally maintained additive model of co-occurrence. MD and RD show varying specificity. MD impairments are domain-specific and become more pronounced over time. RD impairments impact both domains early, become more domain-specific over time, but maintain curriculum-contingent math deficits. Findings suggest early math intervention should balance linguistic and conceptual support, as the source of a child’s math difficulties may not be clear until well into elementary school.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143375306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Learning Disabilities
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1