首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Learning Disabilities最新文献

英文 中文
Exploring Predictors of Teachers' Sustained Use of Data-Based Instruction. 探索教师持续使用数据化教学的预测因素。
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241275636
Jechun An,Emma Shanahan,Seohyeon Choi,Kristen L McMaster
The purpose of this logistic regression study was to identify predictors of teacher-reported sustained use of data-based instruction (DBI) during the COVID-19 pandemic and assess the extent to which the identified predictors explained teachers' sustained use after completing programmatic support for intensive early writing instruction. We surveyed 58 teachers who participated in a professional development efficacy trial regarding their sustained use of DBI in writing. The model indicated a higher predicted probability of sustaining DBI for teachers who received the full treatment (tools, learning modules, and coaching for 20 weeks of intervention during their year of participation in the efficacy trial) compared to teachers in the control group who only received tools and learning modules at the end of their participation year. In addition, teachers who taught in-person were more likely to sustain compared to those who taught in remote or hybrid models, controlling for other variables. Furthermore, as the number of facilitators that teachers reported increased, teachers were more likely to sustain their use of DBI components, controlling for other variables. Further research could shed light on the relative impact of different types of facilitators and different levels of support.
这项逻辑回归研究的目的是确定在 COVID-19 大流行期间教师报告的持续使用基于数据的教学(DBI)的预测因素,并评估已确定的预测因素在多大程度上解释了教师在完成强化早期写作教学的项目支持后的持续使用情况。我们对 58 名参加专业发展效果试验的教师进行了调查,以了解他们在写作中持续使用 DBI 的情况。模型显示,与对照组的教师相比,接受了全面治疗(工具、学习模块以及在参与疗效试验的一年中为期 20 周的干预辅导)的教师持续使用 DBI 的预测概率更高,因为对照组的教师在参与试验的一年结束时只接受了工具和学习模块。此外,在控制其他变量的情况下,与采用远程或混合模式授课的教师相比,采用面对面授课的教师更有可能坚持下去。此外,在控制其他变量的情况下,随着教师所报告的促进者人数的增加,教师更有可能持续使用 DBI 组件。进一步的研究可以揭示不同类型的促进者和不同程度的支持的相对影响。
{"title":"Exploring Predictors of Teachers' Sustained Use of Data-Based Instruction.","authors":"Jechun An,Emma Shanahan,Seohyeon Choi,Kristen L McMaster","doi":"10.1177/00222194241275636","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194241275636","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this logistic regression study was to identify predictors of teacher-reported sustained use of data-based instruction (DBI) during the COVID-19 pandemic and assess the extent to which the identified predictors explained teachers' sustained use after completing programmatic support for intensive early writing instruction. We surveyed 58 teachers who participated in a professional development efficacy trial regarding their sustained use of DBI in writing. The model indicated a higher predicted probability of sustaining DBI for teachers who received the full treatment (tools, learning modules, and coaching for 20 weeks of intervention during their year of participation in the efficacy trial) compared to teachers in the control group who only received tools and learning modules at the end of their participation year. In addition, teachers who taught in-person were more likely to sustain compared to those who taught in remote or hybrid models, controlling for other variables. Furthermore, as the number of facilitators that teachers reported increased, teachers were more likely to sustain their use of DBI components, controlling for other variables. Further research could shed light on the relative impact of different types of facilitators and different levels of support.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"7 1","pages":"222194241275636"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142245394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring Instructional Interactions During Reading Instruction for Students Receiving Intervention in Middle School. 中学干预学生阅读教学互动的测量
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-14 DOI: 10.1177/00222194231211948
Scott K Baker, Patrick C Kennedy, Dean Richards, Nancy J Nelson, Hank Fien, Christian T Doabler

More than two-thirds of middle school students do not read proficiently. Research has shown that targeted interventions using explicit instruction methods can improve reading outcomes for struggling readers. A central feature of explicit instruction is the systematic implementation of instructional interactions, but it is not clear what specific instructional interaction practices lead to stronger outcomes for middle school readers. This study used a regression discontinuity design to compare the frequency and impact of instructional interactions experienced by U.S. eighth-grade students who received a targeted reading intervention (n = 1,461) with those who did not (n = 4,292). Results indicated that students who received intervention experienced far more instructional interactions with their teachers than did students who did not. However, the association between rates of interaction and student need in the intervention group was minimal, and the relationship between the rate of instructional interactions and reading growth was mixed. Implications for intervening with struggling students in the middle grades are discussed.

超过三分之二的中学生阅读不熟练。研究表明,使用明确的指导方法进行有针对性的干预可以改善困难读者的阅读效果。显性教学的一个核心特征是系统地实施教学互动,但目前尚不清楚哪些具体的教学互动实践能给中学读者带来更强的结果。本研究采用回归不连续设计来比较接受针对性阅读干预的八年级学生(n = 1461)和未接受针对性阅读干预的八年级学生(n = 4292)所经历的教学互动的频率和影响。结果表明,接受干预的学生比没有接受干预的学生与老师有更多的教学互动。然而,在干预组中,互动率和学生需求之间的联系是最小的,教学互动率和阅读增长之间的关系是混合的。本文讨论了干预中学挣扎学生的意义。
{"title":"Measuring Instructional Interactions During Reading Instruction for Students Receiving Intervention in Middle School.","authors":"Scott K Baker, Patrick C Kennedy, Dean Richards, Nancy J Nelson, Hank Fien, Christian T Doabler","doi":"10.1177/00222194231211948","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194231211948","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More than two-thirds of middle school students do not read proficiently. Research has shown that targeted interventions using explicit instruction methods can improve reading outcomes for struggling readers. A central feature of explicit instruction is the systematic implementation of instructional interactions, but it is not clear what specific instructional interaction practices lead to stronger outcomes for middle school readers. This study used a regression discontinuity design to compare the frequency and impact of instructional interactions experienced by U.S. eighth-grade students who received a targeted reading intervention (<i>n</i> = 1,461) with those who did not (<i>n</i> = 4,292). Results indicated that students who received intervention experienced far more instructional interactions with their teachers than did students who did not. However, the association between rates of interaction and student need in the intervention group was minimal, and the relationship between the rate of instructional interactions and reading growth was mixed. Implications for intervening with struggling students in the middle grades are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"303-316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"92156988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Does Visual Temporal Processing Affect Chinese Character Reading in Children With Dyslexia? From the Perspective of Inhibition. 视觉时间加工如何影响阅读障碍儿童的汉字阅读?从抑制的角度来看。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-09 DOI: 10.1177/00222194231207549
Rong-An Jhuo, Hsien-Ming Yang, Huang-Ju Tsai, Li-Chih Wang

Given that inhibition interacts with visual temporal processing (VTP), the past evidence regarding the influence of VTP on the Chinese character reading of children with dyslexia may not disclose the whole picture without considering inhibition. Thus, the present study is among the first to investigate VTP and cognitive inhibition as well as their relationships to Chinese character reading. We compared the performances of 62 Chinese-speaking children with dyslexia in primary school (n = 62, Mage = 11.36 years) on VTP and inhibition tasks to those in a chronological-age-matched group (CA; n = 62, Mage = 11.57 years) and reading-level-matched group (RL; n = 62, Mage = 8.98 years). The results revealed that children with dyslexia performed worse than both the CA-matched and RL-matched groups in VTP and inhibition after controlling for age, nonverbal intelligence, and attention. Moreover, the relationship between VTP and Chinese character reading was moderated by inhibition in children with dyslexia. VTP is positively related to Chinese character reading, but this relationship is observed only at higher levels of inhibition. Our results suggest that inhibition plays a potential role in VTP and Chinese character reading, especially for those with dyslexia whose proficiency in inhibition is not as intact as that of typically developing children.

鉴于抑制与视觉时间处理(VTP)相互作用,过去关于VTP对阅读障碍儿童汉字阅读的影响的证据可能无法在不考虑抑制的情况下揭示全貌。因此,本研究是最早研究VTP和认知抑制及其与汉字阅读的关系的研究之一。我们比较了62名小学语文阅读障碍儿童(n=62,Mage=11.36岁)在VTP和抑制任务上的表现,以及年龄匹配组(CA;n=62,Mage=11.57岁)和阅读水平匹配组(RL;n=62、Mage=8.98岁)的表现。结果显示,在控制了年龄、非语言智力和注意力后,阅读障碍儿童在VTP和抑制方面的表现比CA匹配组和RL匹配组都差。此外,阅读障碍儿童的VTP与汉字阅读之间的关系受到抑制的调节。VTP与汉字阅读呈正相关,但这种关系只有在较高的抑制水平下才能观察到。我们的研究结果表明,抑制在VTP和汉字阅读中发挥着潜在的作用,尤其是对于那些有阅读障碍的儿童,他们的抑制能力不如典型发育中的儿童。
{"title":"How Does Visual Temporal Processing Affect Chinese Character Reading in Children With Dyslexia? From the Perspective of Inhibition.","authors":"Rong-An Jhuo, Hsien-Ming Yang, Huang-Ju Tsai, Li-Chih Wang","doi":"10.1177/00222194231207549","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194231207549","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given that inhibition interacts with visual temporal processing (VTP), the past evidence regarding the influence of VTP on the Chinese character reading of children with dyslexia may not disclose the whole picture without considering inhibition. Thus, the present study is among the first to investigate VTP and cognitive inhibition as well as their relationships to Chinese character reading. We compared the performances of 62 Chinese-speaking children with dyslexia in primary school (<i>n</i> = 62, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 11.36 years) on VTP and inhibition tasks to those in a chronological-age-matched group (CA; <i>n</i> = 62, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 11.57 years) and reading-level-matched group (RL; <i>n</i> = 62, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 8.98 years). The results revealed that children with dyslexia performed worse than both the CA-matched and RL-matched groups in VTP and inhibition after controlling for age, nonverbal intelligence, and attention. Moreover, the relationship between VTP and Chinese character reading was moderated by inhibition in children with dyslexia. VTP is positively related to Chinese character reading, but this relationship is observed only at higher levels of inhibition. Our results suggest that inhibition plays a potential role in VTP and Chinese character reading, especially for those with dyslexia whose proficiency in inhibition is not as intact as that of typically developing children.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"317-332"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71522989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementation Drivers of Data-Based Instruction for Students With Intensive Learning Needs: A Systematic Review. 对有强烈学习需求的学生实施基于数据的教学的驱动因素:系统回顾。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-30 DOI: 10.1177/00222194231220070
Seohyeon Choi, Emma Shanahan, Bess Casey-Wilke, Jechun An, LeAnne Johnson

Despite decades of research efforts, data-based instruction (DBI) for students with intensive intervention needs are not being widely used in practice as anticipated, and many educators have difficulties in implementing it. This systematic review aimed to examine what kinds of implementation drivers and strategies have been used to support educators implementing DBI and what kinds of implementation outcomes researchers have measured. Eighteen studies were synthesized using the Implementation Drivers framework and Implementation Outcomes taxonomy and were quality appraised. We found that the majority of studies primarily used competency drivers to increase teachers' DBI expertise, while a limited number of studies focused on organizational and leadership drivers. Acceptability and fidelity were frequently assessed as implementation outcomes. We discussed the implications of the findings, including the need for researchers to incorporate implementation drivers and outcomes at diverse levels to best support educators' implementation of DBI, as well as the limitations of this review, such as the limited generalizability of the findings.

尽管经过几十年的研究,针对有强化干预需求的学生的基于数据的教学(DBI)并没有像预期的那样在实践中得到广泛应用,许多教育工作者在实施过程中遇到了困难。本系统性综述旨在研究有哪些实施驱动因素和策略被用于支持教育工作者实施 DBI,以及研究人员测量了哪些实施结果。我们使用 "实施驱动因素 "框架和 "实施结果 "分类法对 18 项研究进行了综合,并进行了质量评估。我们发现,大多数研究主要利用能力驱动因素来提高教师的 DBI 专业技能,而少数研究则侧重于组织和领导驱动因素。可接受性和忠实性经常被评估为实施成果。我们讨论了研究结果的意义,包括研究人员需要在不同层面纳入实施驱动因素和成果,以便为教育工作者实施 DBI 提供最佳支持,以及本综述的局限性,如研究结果的推广性有限。
{"title":"Implementation Drivers of Data-Based Instruction for Students With Intensive Learning Needs: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Seohyeon Choi, Emma Shanahan, Bess Casey-Wilke, Jechun An, LeAnne Johnson","doi":"10.1177/00222194231220070","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194231220070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite decades of research efforts, data-based instruction (DBI) for students with intensive intervention needs are not being widely used in practice as anticipated, and many educators have difficulties in implementing it. This systematic review aimed to examine what kinds of implementation drivers and strategies have been used to support educators implementing DBI and what kinds of implementation outcomes researchers have measured. Eighteen studies were synthesized using the Implementation Drivers framework and Implementation Outcomes taxonomy and were quality appraised. We found that the majority of studies primarily used competency drivers to increase teachers' DBI expertise, while a limited number of studies focused on organizational and leadership drivers. Acceptability and fidelity were frequently assessed as implementation outcomes. We discussed the implications of the findings, including the need for researchers to incorporate implementation drivers and outcomes at diverse levels to best support educators' implementation of DBI, as well as the limitations of this review, such as the limited generalizability of the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"291-302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139075555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Systematic Review of CBM Content in Practitioner-Focused Journals: Do We Talk About Instructional Decision-Making? 对以从业者为中心的期刊中建立信任机制内容的系统回顾:我们是否在谈论教学决策?
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-07 DOI: 10.1177/00222194231215031
Erica C Fry, Jessica R Toste, Beth R Feuer, Christine A Espin

Data-based decision-making (DBDM) using curriculum-based measurement (CBM) data has demonstrated effectiveness in improving academic achievement for students with or at risk for learning disability. Despite substantial evidence supporting DBDM, its use is not common practice for many educators, even those who regularly collect CBM data. One explanation for its lack of widespread use is that educators may not receive adequate training in the DBDM aspects of CBM. Espin et al. examined the extent to which DBDM is represented in CBM professional development (PD) materials and found that the topic was significantly underrepresented (12% to 14% of CBM PD material content) compared with other CBM topics. The purpose of this study was to conduct a conceptual replication of the Espin et al. systematic review through an analysis of CBM content in practitioner journal articles. The present review includes 29 practitioner articles coded to the four CBM categories used in the Espin et al. study: (a) general CBM information, (b) conducting CBM, (c) data-based decision-making, and (d) other. Results revealed a pattern similar to the one found by Espin et al. with approximately 18% of the content of practitioner articles on CBM devoted to the topic of decision-making. These findings strengthen the recommendation from Espin et al. for increased attention to DBDM in CBM training materials.

使用基于课程的测量(CBM)数据的基于数据的决策(DBDM)已经证明在提高有学习障碍或有学习障碍风险的学生的学习成绩方面是有效的。尽管有大量证据支持DBDM,但对于许多教育工作者来说,使用DBDM并不常见,即使是那些定期收集CBM数据的人。它没有得到广泛使用的一个解释是,教育工作者可能没有在CBM的DBDM方面接受足够的培训。Espin等人研究了DBDM在CBM专业发展(PD)材料中的代表程度,发现与其他CBM主题相比,该主题的代表性明显不足(占CBM PD材料含量的12%至14%)。本研究的目的是通过分析从业者期刊文章中的CBM内容,对Espin等人的系统综述进行概念性复制。本综述包括29篇从业人员文章,编码为Espin等人研究中使用的四个CBM类别:(a)一般CBM信息,(b)实施CBM, (c)基于数据的决策,以及(d)其他。结果显示了一种类似于Espin等人发现的模式,大约18%的CBM从业者文章的内容致力于决策主题。这些发现加强了Espin等人的建议,即在CBM培训材料中增加对DBDM的关注。
{"title":"A Systematic Review of CBM Content in Practitioner-Focused Journals: Do We Talk About Instructional Decision-Making?","authors":"Erica C Fry, Jessica R Toste, Beth R Feuer, Christine A Espin","doi":"10.1177/00222194231215031","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194231215031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data-based decision-making (DBDM) using curriculum-based measurement (CBM) data has demonstrated effectiveness in improving academic achievement for students with or at risk for learning disability. Despite substantial evidence supporting DBDM, its use is not common practice for many educators, even those who regularly collect CBM data. One explanation for its lack of widespread use is that educators may not receive adequate training in the DBDM aspects of CBM. Espin et al. examined the extent to which DBDM is represented in CBM professional development (PD) materials and found that the topic was significantly underrepresented (12% to 14% of CBM PD material content) compared with other CBM topics. The purpose of this study was to conduct a conceptual replication of the Espin et al. systematic review through an analysis of CBM content in practitioner journal articles. The present review includes 29 practitioner articles coded to the four CBM categories used in the Espin et al. study: (a) general CBM information, (b) conducting CBM, (c) data-based decision-making, and (d) other. Results revealed a pattern similar to the one found by Espin et al. with approximately 18% of the content of practitioner articles on CBM devoted to the topic of decision-making. These findings strengthen the recommendation from Espin et al. for increased attention to DBDM in CBM training materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"275-290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375907/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138499819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Family-Based Intervention for Early Elementary Students With Reading and Behavioral Difficulties: A Pilot Study. 对有阅读和行为障碍的小学低年级学生进行基于家庭的干预:试点研究。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241263649
Garrett J Roberts, Philip Capin, Anna Handy, Brooke Coté, Zaira Jimenez

We created and tested a family-based intervention with families of children in Grades 1 and 2 with reading and behavioral difficulties to investigate its impact on text comprehension. Developed with input from parents, reading experts, and behavior specialists, Family-RISE (Reading Intervention with Supports for Engagement) integrates evidence-based practices for enhancing students' knowledge of narrative texts with effective behavioral supports to maximize student engagement and minimize disruptive behaviors to help parents engage successfully in shared storybook reading. We assessed the effects of Family-RISE on children's narrative text comprehension using a multiple-baseline design. A functional relation was established between Family-RISE and narrative text comprehension, indicating Family-RISE substantially improved narrative text comprehension. Furthermore, nonoverlap of all pairs, Tau-U, and standard mean difference effect sizes were all considered large in favor of the intervention. Family members reported that the intervention was highly usable, feasible to implement, and socially valid. These findings underscore the promise of the Family-RISE intervention and the value of developing interventions that simultaneously support reading and behavior for children with co-occurring difficulties in these areas.

我们创建了一种以家庭为基础的干预措施,并对有阅读和行为障碍的一、二年级儿童的家庭进行了测试,以研究其对文本理解的影响。Family-RISE(Reading Intervention with Supports for Engagement)是在听取了家长、阅读专家和行为专家的意见后开发的,它将循证实践与有效的行为支持相结合,以提高学生对叙事文本的认识,从而最大限度地提高学生的参与度,减少破坏性行为,帮助家长成功地参与故事书的分享阅读。我们采用多基线设计评估了家庭-RISE 对儿童叙事文本理解能力的影响。结果表明,"家庭-RISE "与叙事文本理解之间存在功能关系,这表明 "家庭-RISE "大大提高了叙事文本的理解能力。此外,所有配对的非重叠效应、Tau-U效应和标准均差效应均被认为对干预措施有利。家庭成员表示,该干预措施可用性高、实施可行且具有社会有效性。这些研究结果强调了 "家庭-RISE "干预措施的前景,以及为在阅读和行为方面同时存在困难的儿童开发干预措施的价值。
{"title":"A Family-Based Intervention for Early Elementary Students With Reading and Behavioral Difficulties: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Garrett J Roberts, Philip Capin, Anna Handy, Brooke Coté, Zaira Jimenez","doi":"10.1177/00222194241263649","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194241263649","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We created and tested a family-based intervention with families of children in Grades 1 and 2 with reading and behavioral difficulties to investigate its impact on text comprehension. Developed with input from parents, reading experts, and behavior specialists, Family-RISE (Reading Intervention with Supports for Engagement) integrates evidence-based practices for enhancing students' knowledge of narrative texts with effective behavioral supports to maximize student engagement and minimize disruptive behaviors to help parents engage successfully in shared storybook reading. We assessed the effects of Family-RISE on children's narrative text comprehension using a multiple-baseline design. A functional relation was established between Family-RISE and narrative text comprehension, indicating Family-RISE substantially improved narrative text comprehension. Furthermore, nonoverlap of all pairs, Tau-<i>U</i>, and standard mean difference effect sizes were all considered large in favor of the intervention. Family members reported that the intervention was highly usable, feasible to implement, and socially valid. These findings underscore the promise of the Family-RISE intervention and the value of developing interventions that simultaneously support reading and behavior for children with co-occurring difficulties in these areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"222194241263649"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141876356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing Beliefs About Intrinsic and Extrinsic Determinants of SLD: Evaluating the Factor Structure of a Novel Instrument. 评估对 SLD 内在和外在决定因素的信念:评估新工具的因子结构。
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241263659
Courtenay A Barrett, Kathrin E Maki, Steven R Chesnut

Schools conduct comprehensive psychoeducational evaluations to identify students with specific learning disabilities (SLDs) and determine whether they qualify for special education services. This decision-making process is complex and research has documented many factors influencing SLD identification decisions. One such factor may be decision-makers' beliefs about the underlying causes of SLD, including intrinsic and extrinsic factors. However, no studies to date have examined the underlying factor structure of the responses to prompts about the causes of SLD from intrinsic and extrinsic perspectives. This study was conducted with a sample of 521 school psychologists as part of a larger study examining decision-making during SLD identification. Using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) to compare two theoretically plausible models, results suggested that a single latent factor best captured variability in responses to these prompts. Implications for assessing beliefs and how they impact the psychoeducational assessment process to identify SLDs are discussed, along with areas for future research.

学校会进行全面的心理教育评估,以识别有特殊学习障碍(SLD)的学生,并确定 他们是否有资格接受特殊教育服务。这一决策过程是复杂的,研究记录了许多影响 SLD 鉴定决策的因素。其中一个因素可能是决策者对 SLD 根本原因的看法,包括内在和外在因素。然而,迄今为止,还没有任何研究从内在和外在两个角度考察了对有关 SLD 原因的提示所做反应的潜在因素结构。本研究对 521 名学校心理学家进行了抽样调查,作为一项大型研究的一部分,该研究考察了在鉴别 SLD 过程中的决策问题。通过确证因子分析(CFA)对两个理论上可行的模型进行比较,结果表明,单一的潜在因子最能反映对这些提示的反应的差异性。本文讨论了评估信念的意义、信念如何影响心理教育评估过程以识别 SLD,以及未来的研究领域。
{"title":"Assessing Beliefs About Intrinsic and Extrinsic Determinants of SLD: Evaluating the Factor Structure of a Novel Instrument.","authors":"Courtenay A Barrett, Kathrin E Maki, Steven R Chesnut","doi":"10.1177/00222194241263659","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194241263659","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Schools conduct comprehensive psychoeducational evaluations to identify students with specific learning disabilities (SLDs) and determine whether they qualify for special education services. This decision-making process is complex and research has documented many factors influencing SLD identification decisions. One such factor may be decision-makers' beliefs about the underlying causes of SLD, including intrinsic and extrinsic factors. However, no studies to date have examined the underlying factor structure of the responses to prompts about the causes of SLD from intrinsic and extrinsic perspectives. This study was conducted with a sample of 521 school psychologists as part of a larger study examining decision-making during SLD identification. Using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) to compare two theoretically plausible models, results suggested that a single latent factor best captured variability in responses to these prompts. Implications for assessing beliefs and how they impact the psychoeducational assessment process to identify SLDs are discussed, along with areas for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"222194241263659"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141761747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do Mathematics and Reading Skills Impact Student Science Outcomes? 数学和阅读能力会影响学生的科学成果吗?
IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1177/00222194241263646
Christian T Doabler, Megan Rojo, Jenna A Gersib, Anna-Maria Fall, Maria A Longhi, Gail E Lovette, Greg Roberts, Jasmine Uy, Katharina Johnson, Shadi Ghafghazi, Jason B Phelps, Sarah R Powell, William J Therrien

Establishing validated science programs for students with or at risk for learning disabilities requires testing treatment effects and exploring differential response patterns. This study explored whether students' initial mathematics and reading skills influenced their treatment response to a whole-class, second-grade science program called Scientific Explorers (Sci2). The original Sci2 study employed a cluster randomized controlled design and included 294 students from 18 second-grade classrooms. Differential effects of the program by initial mathematics and reading skill levels were not observed for an interactive science assessment and a distal science outcome measure. However, based on initial reading skill levels, moderation results were found on a science vocabulary measure, suggesting the effects of Sci2 were greatest for students with higher initial reading skills. Similar results were found using initial mathematics skill levels as a predictor of differential response such that students with higher mathematics skills reaped stronger treatment effects on the vocabulary measure. Further, we found initial mathematics skills also influenced outcomes on the proximal science content assessment, where students with higher initial mathematics skills led to higher outcomes. Overall, findings suggest Sci2 produced robust effects for all students (g = 0.24-1.23), regardless of initial skill proficiencies. Implications for exploring differential response in science intervention research are discussed.

要为有学习障碍或有学习障碍风险的学生制定有效的科学课程,需要测试治疗效果并探索不同的反应模式。本研究探讨了学生最初的数学和阅读技能是否会影响他们对名为 "科学探索者"(Sci2)的二年级全班科学课程的治疗反应。最初的 Sci2 研究采用了分组随机对照设计,包括来自 18 个二年级班级的 294 名学生。在互动式科学评估和远距离科学结果测量中,没有观察到该课程对初始数学和阅读技能水平的不同影响。然而,根据最初的阅读技能水平,在科学词汇量测量中发现了调节结果,表明 Sci2 对最初阅读技能较高的学生的影响最大。使用初始数学技能水平作为差异反应的预测因子也发现了类似的结果,即数学技能较高的学生在词汇量测量上获得了更强的治疗效果。此外,我们还发现,初始数学技能也会影响近似科学内容评估的结果,初始数学技能较高的学生会获得更高的结果。总之,研究结果表明,无论初始技能熟练程度如何,Sci2 对所有学生都产生了强有力的效果(g = 0.24-1.23)。本文讨论了在科学干预研究中探索差异反应的意义。
{"title":"Do Mathematics and Reading Skills Impact Student Science Outcomes?","authors":"Christian T Doabler, Megan Rojo, Jenna A Gersib, Anna-Maria Fall, Maria A Longhi, Gail E Lovette, Greg Roberts, Jasmine Uy, Katharina Johnson, Shadi Ghafghazi, Jason B Phelps, Sarah R Powell, William J Therrien","doi":"10.1177/00222194241263646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194241263646","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Establishing validated science programs for students with or at risk for learning disabilities requires testing treatment effects and exploring differential response patterns. This study explored whether students' initial mathematics and reading skills influenced their treatment response to a whole-class, second-grade science program called Scientific Explorers (Sci2). The original Sci2 study employed a cluster randomized controlled design and included 294 students from 18 second-grade classrooms. Differential effects of the program by initial mathematics and reading skill levels were not observed for an interactive science assessment and a distal science outcome measure. However, based on initial reading skill levels, moderation results were found on a science vocabulary measure, suggesting the effects of Sci2 were greatest for students with higher initial reading skills. Similar results were found using initial mathematics skill levels as a predictor of differential response such that students with higher mathematics skills reaped stronger treatment effects on the vocabulary measure. Further, we found initial mathematics skills also influenced outcomes on the proximal science content assessment, where students with higher initial mathematics skills led to higher outcomes. Overall, findings suggest Sci2 produced robust effects for all students (<i>g</i> = 0.24-1.23), regardless of initial skill proficiencies. Implications for exploring differential response in science intervention research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"222194241263646"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141761748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reading Interventions for Students in Grades 3-12 With Significant Word Reading Difficulties. 3-12年级单词阅读困难学生的阅读干预。
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-08 DOI: 10.1177/00222194231207556
Alexis N Boucher, Bethany H Bhat, Nathan H Clemens, Sharon Vaughn, Katherine O'Donnell

Most students with reading difficulties struggle to read words. We examined intervention effects for students with significant word reading difficulties (SWRD; standard score of 80 on at least one pretest measure of word reading), which includes individuals with or at risk for dyslexia. We investigated: (a) What are the effects of reading interventions for students in Grades 3-12 with SWRD? and (b) What intervention features (i.e., instructional components and elements of dosage) are related to improved reading outcomes for the target population? A meta-analysis of 22 studies and 208 effect sizes revealed a statistically significant, positive, mean effect (g = 0.14, standard error [SE] = 0.04, p = .01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.04, 0.23]) of interventions for the target population. Subset analyses revealed positive, statistically significant intervention effects on measures of pseudoword reading (g = 0.38, SE = 0.07, p = .0003, 95% CI [0.21, 0.54]) and pseudoword reading fluency (g = 0.29, SE = 0.09, p = .010, 95% CI [0.09, 0.49]). Moderator analyses yielded statistically significant, positive effects associated with increased total hours of intervention, β = 0.003, SE = 0.0009, t(8.31) = 3.58, p = .007. Overall, findings indicate a need for interventions that improve generalized real-world reading for the target population.

大多数有阅读困难的学生很难读懂单词。我们研究了对有严重单词阅读困难的学生的干预效果(SWRD;至少一项单词阅读前测试的标准分为80),其中包括有阅读障碍或有阅读障碍风险的人。我们调查了:(a)阅读干预对3-12年级SWRD学生的影响是什么?以及(b)哪些干预特征(即指导成分和剂量要素)与目标人群阅读结果的改善有关?一项对22项研究和208个效应大小的荟萃分析显示,目标人群的干预措施具有统计学意义的阳性平均效应(g=0.14,标准误差[SE]=0.04,p=0.01,95%置信区间[CI]:[0.042])。子集分析显示,对假字阅读(g=0.38,SE=0.07,p=.0003,95%CI[0.21,0.54])和假字阅读流畅度(g=0.29,SE=0.09,p=.010,95%CI[0.09,0.49],SE=0.0009,t(8.31)=3.58,p=.007。总体而言,研究结果表明,需要采取干预措施,提高目标人群的普遍现实世界阅读能力。
{"title":"Reading Interventions for Students in Grades 3-12 With Significant Word Reading Difficulties.","authors":"Alexis N Boucher, Bethany H Bhat, Nathan H Clemens, Sharon Vaughn, Katherine O'Donnell","doi":"10.1177/00222194231207556","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194231207556","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most students with reading difficulties struggle to read words. We examined intervention effects for students with <i>significant</i> word reading difficulties (SWRD; standard score of 80 on at least one pretest measure of word reading), which includes individuals with or at risk for dyslexia. We investigated: (a) What are the effects of reading interventions for students in Grades 3-12 with SWRD? and (b) What intervention features (i.e., instructional components and elements of dosage) are related to improved reading outcomes for the target population? A meta-analysis of 22 studies and 208 effect sizes revealed a statistically significant, positive, mean effect (<i>g</i> = 0.14, standard error [<i>SE</i>] = 0.04, <i>p</i> = .01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.04, 0.23]) of interventions for the target population. Subset analyses revealed positive, statistically significant intervention effects on measures of pseudoword reading (<i>g</i> = 0.38, <i>SE</i> = 0.07, <i>p</i> = .0003, 95% CI [0.21, 0.54]) and pseudoword reading fluency (<i>g</i> = 0.29, <i>SE</i> = 0.09, <i>p</i> = .010, 95% CI [0.09, 0.49]). Moderator analyses yielded statistically significant, positive effects associated with increased total hours of intervention, β = 0.003, <i>SE</i> = 0.0009, <i>t</i>(8.31) = 3.58, <i>p</i> = .007. Overall, findings indicate a need for interventions that improve generalized real-world reading for the target population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"203-223"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71487553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Extended Time Accommodation and the Academic, Behavioral, and Psychological Outcomes of Students With Learning Disabilities. 延长住宿时间与学习障碍学生的学业、行为和心理成果》(Extended Time Accommodation and Academic, Behavioral, and Psychological Outcomes of Students With Learning Disabilities)。
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-30 DOI: 10.1177/00222194231195624
Xin Wei, Susu Zhang

This study analyzed performance, process, and survey data of eighth graders with learning disabilities (LDs) who took the 2017 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) digital math test. Compared with students with LDs who did not receive extended time accommodations (ETAs), students with LDs who received and used ETA scored significantly higher on the test, whereas students with LDs who received but did not use ETA scored significantly lower on the test. In addition, students with LDs in the two ETA groups reported a lower level of perceived time pressure and a higher level of math interest and enjoyment than their peers who did not receive ETA. For students with LDs who received ETA, optimal performance was achieved with 50% additional time, while their peers who did not receive ETA typically performed best when utilizing most of their allotted time. The analysis of process data revealed that students with LDs who used ETA performed more actions, had a higher number of revisits, used universal design digital tools more frequently, and performed better on time-consuming items than their peers who did not receive ETA at the same level of math performance.

本研究分析了有学习障碍(LDs)的八年级学生参加2017年美国国家教育进展评估(NAEP)数字数学考试的成绩、过程和调查数据。与未接受延长时间辅导(ETA)的学习障碍学生相比,接受并使用ETA的学习障碍学生的考试成绩明显较高,而接受但未使用ETA的学习障碍学生的考试成绩明显较低。此外,与未接受 ETA 的学生相比,两个 ETA 小组中的 LD 学生对时间压力的感知程度较低,对数学的兴趣和喜爱程度较高。对于接受 ETA 的有 LDs 的学生来说,50% 的额外时间可以达到最佳成绩,而没有接受 ETA 的学生通常在利用大部分分配时间时成绩最好。对过程数据的分析表明,在数学成绩相同的情况下,与未获得 ETA 的同学相比,使用 ETA 的有 LD 的学生做了更多的操作,有更多的重访次数,更频繁地使用通用设计数字工具,在耗时的项目上表现更好。
{"title":"Extended Time Accommodation and the Academic, Behavioral, and Psychological Outcomes of Students With Learning Disabilities.","authors":"Xin Wei, Susu Zhang","doi":"10.1177/00222194231195624","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194231195624","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study analyzed performance, process, and survey data of eighth graders with learning disabilities (LDs) who took the 2017 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) digital math test. Compared with students with LDs who did not receive extended time accommodations (ETAs), students with LDs who received and used ETA scored significantly higher on the test, whereas students with LDs who received but did not use ETA scored significantly lower on the test. In addition, students with LDs in the two ETA groups reported a lower level of perceived time pressure and a higher level of math interest and enjoyment than their peers who did not receive ETA. For students with LDs who received ETA, optimal performance was achieved with 50% additional time, while their peers who did not receive ETA typically performed best when utilizing most of their allotted time. The analysis of process data revealed that students with LDs who used ETA performed more actions, had a higher number of revisits, used universal design digital tools more frequently, and performed better on time-consuming items than their peers who did not receive ETA at the same level of math performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"242-254"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10113025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Learning Disabilities
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1