Journal of Homosexuality最新文献

A scoping review was conducted using international databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, PubMed, Embase, and EBSCOhost, covering studies since 2009. Sixty-three articles focusing on gender-based violence (GBV) among 2SLGBTQIA+ university students and emergent adults were analyzed, incorporating climate change-related vulnerabilities that exacerbate GBV risks for marginalized students. Key factors were categorized into bullying, violence, and victimization; intersectionality; lack of awareness; disclosure of violence; and well-being and mental health implications. The findings reveal that discrimination, lack of support, and structural inequalities heighten vulnerability to GBV, compounded by climate-induced stressors such as displacement and resource scarcity. Practical implications include integrating intersectional approaches, tailored mental health support, climate resilience strategies, and anti-discrimination training into institutional policies, while public policy should strengthen safety nets, improve housing and healthcare access, and address compounded risks for marginalized groups during climate crises. Social work should prioritize culturally competent, trauma-informed interventions and foster community resilience. The study identifies critical research gaps, emphasizing the need to expand beyond US-focused studies to explore global intersections of GBV, climate change, and marginalized identities. These findings underscore the urgency of comprehensive strategies to mitigate GBV risks and enhance resilience for 2SLGBTQIA+ students.

This study explores how nonbinary individuals manage minority stress within the predominantly binary society of Switzerland. Utilizing social identity theory and minority stress theory, along with thematic analysis of focus group interviews with 16 nonbinary individuals and 14 social identity maps, the study found three concentric circles of social groups: circle 1 (family, partners, friends), circle 2 (coworkers, LGBTIQA+ communities), and circle 3 (the public, media, Swiss institutions). Participants primarily felt affirmed and supported by circles 1 and 2. They reported feeling less support from circle 3 and engaged in cautious social monitoring to anticipate potential discrimination. They found discrimination from close social groups (circle 1) more distressing than from emotionally distant ones (circle 2 or 3). Our study also examined strategies employed by nonbinary participants, including monitoring others and their trans-friendliness before coming out, educating others, taking actions to make institutions more inclusive, disengaging from invalidating individuals, groups, or institutions, and searching for affirmative environments. However, these coping strategies often entail significant mental workload and exhaustion. We conclude with participant-generated recommendations to enhance nonbinary inclusion in society, politics, and healthcare. The findings underscore the need for broader societal awareness and support to mitigate minority stress experienced by nonbinary individuals.

By developing its first Feminist International Assistance policy, Canada has positioned itself as an international feminist and diverse SOGIESC rights leader. However, the scarcity of references to sexual orientations, gender identities and expressions, and sex characteristics (SOGIESC) has raised questions on how these concepts were included in such a policy. This case study's objective is to better understand how Canadian policies play a role in including and normalizing diverse SOGIESC at the global level. We used documentary research, observations, and interviews to respond to that question. An abductive analysis was conducted, integrating a socio-ecological approach with emerging themes from the data. All socio-ecological levels were mobilized by Canadian actions toward SOGIESC normalization. Public policies were informed by a human rights-based approach and inclusive language. Canadian norms toward SOGIESC rights were conveyed within international communities by building bridges, positioning Canada as a political broker, while organizational resources remained limited. Individuals and their interpersonal skills were central in creating allyship through firsthand experiences. The importance of transpartisanship and stronger coordination of soft power emerged as new and practical strategies responding to inclusion and normalization challenges. These strategies could represent important interactive spaces and leaders, in a context of rising conservative right-wing coalitions.

Environmental contexts likely influence the extent to which LGBTQIA+ individuals, compared to their cisgender, heterosexual counterparts, experience poorer physical, mental, and behavioral health outcomes. This case study was conducted within a non-affirming, religiously affiliated university. A Qualtrics-hosted survey was completed by 596 students, of whom 63% identified as White, 37% as BIPOC, and 36% as LGBTQIA+. We examined perceptions of LGBTQIA+ college non-responsiveness and LGBTQIA+ stigma as mediators between LGBTQIA+ identity and affective well-being, and the role of BIPOC identity as a moderator of this effect. Consistent with existing literature, LGBTQIA+ students reported lower affective well-being (B = -0.236, p < 0.001) and perceived greater college non-responsiveness (B = 1.255, p < 0.001) and stigma (B = 1.226, p < 0.001) than their cis-hetero counterparts. College non-responsiveness mediated the relationship between LGBTQIA+ identity and affective well-being; however, this effect was not moderated by BIPOC identity. Conversely, LGBTQIA+ stigma did not serve as a parallel mediator. Compared to their BIPOC peers, White LGBTQIA+ students perceived greater LGBTQIA+ stigma. We conclude with recommendations for the university to revise policies and cultivate a more LGBTQIA+-affirming culture, and we advise those who counsel prospective students to share these findings with their clients.

This commentary critically evaluates Decaro et al.'s study on inclusive sexualities education for queer individuals with multi-minority identities in Italy and the Netherlands. While the study highlights systemic inadequacies and advocates for intersectional frameworks, it must address broader identity dimensions and actionable reforms. This critique emphasizes methodological limitations, the need for cross-cultural parity, and alternative policy pathways, including digital education tools. By broadening the scope and proposing systemic changes, this commentary aims to advance transformative practices in inclusive sexuality education.

This article offers a critical commentary on research concerning minority stress and resilience among LGBTQ+ students in education, utilizing Meyer's minority stress theory. This article challenges the primary approach through an in-depth analysis, proposing an expansion that includes intersectional and community perspectives. In addition to identifying distal and proximal stressors, this article recommends structural interventions in schools to create a more inclusive environment that supports the well-being of minority students.

This article critiques an educational intervention aimed at teaching heterosexual university students in Nigeria about homophobia, heterosexual privilege, and LGB inclusion. While positive outcomes were observed, including increased awareness and empathy toward LGB individuals, the article highlights challenges in altering deeply ingrained attitudes and the limitations of the methods used. The critique also addresses the assumption that awareness alone can prompt attitudinal change and emphasizes the need for structural and intersectional approaches to foster more sustainable change.

This cross-cultural comparative study sought to estimate levels of media trust and perceived media stress and model the associations of these perceptions with coping self-efficacy, positive thinking, and negativity toward heterosexual individuals and society. A total of 1,153 self-identified LGBTQ+ individuals from three countries (Philippines, Hungary, Iran) where LGBTQ+ rights are restricted by governmental actions completed an online survey. Media trust was higher among Filipinos compared to Hungarians and Iranians. Perceived media stress was the highest in the Iranian sample. Mediation models revealed that lower media trust was associated with higher perceived media stress among Filipinos and Hungarians. When coping was added to the model, higher perceived media stress was associated with higher perceived ability to cope with negative attitudes toward LGBTQ+ people among Filipinos, which, in turn, was associated with more positive thinking. By contrast, higher perceived media stress was negatively associated with coping ability among Hungarians, though coping ability remained a predictor of positive thinking. Findings suggest that LGBTQ+ perceptions of the local media-regarding its trustworthiness and distressing nature-can be associated with individuals' self-assessment of coping abilities, relationships with heterosexuals and society, and positive outlook on life. However, the nature of these associations may be culture-specific.

ChatGPT has significantly influenced healthcare, yet its impact on patient education regarding gender-affirmation surgery (GAS) remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate ChatGPT's utility in providing medical information to patients seeking GAS. In the first part of the study, we collected questions from the "Ask a Surgeon" forum hosted by the American Society of Plastic Surgery and compared responses from verified physicians on the forum to those generated by ChatGPT. We found that ChatGPT's responses were significantly more complex across five readability metrics but had significantly higher DISCERN and PEMAT scores compared to physician responses, indicating superior reliability, quality, and understandability. In the second part of our study, ChatGPT was queried using ten frequently asked questions to simulate a patient's experience seeking treatment information. ChatGPT's responses were generally detailed and on-topic, emphasized the importance of consulting a healthcare provider, and highlighted the psychological and emotional factors associated with GAS. Overall, ChatGPT showed promise as an effective tool for patient education in GAS. It provides clear, private information, correctly emphasizes the psychosocial needs of this patient population, and consistently advises consultation with healthcare professionals. However, its high reading level and lack of transparent references raise concerns about its implementation.

This study critiques the development of the CommTrans Questionnaire, designed to assess communication preferences for transgender and gender-diverse individuals in healthcare. The critique highlights methodology and participant engagement limitations, suggesting a more inclusive approach that considers intersectional experiences and participatory design. By adopting a broader perspective and including further validation, this review aims to enhance the effectiveness of the CommTrans Questionnaire as an adaptable tool for patient-centered communication in clinical settings.