A systematic review and meta-analysis examined the overall concordance between the results of direct assessment and adult report in assessing 2- to 5-year-olds’ learning and developmental competencies, and the possible moderators of the relation. The review included 48 studies published between 2000 and 2021, conducted in 21 different countries and regions, with 81 % of the participants from high-income contexts. More studies used both direct assessment and adult report to measure early learning after 2010 compared to before. These studies varied in terms of the respondents of the adult report, the age of the participants, the developmental domains assessed, the measurement tools, and the analytical methods used. The meta-analysis included 43 of these studies and 103 effect sizes. Analysis from the correlated and hierarchical effects model revealed a moderate correlation (r = .45, 95 % CI [.39, .50]) between direct assessment and adult report. Moderator analyses suggested that correlations between adult report and direct assessment were higher for younger children than for older children, and for the Literacy and Math domains than for other domains. Furthermore, child age and domains showed interactive effects on the concordance when assessing Language and Communication as well as Literacy. When controlling for child age, parent report showed a higher correlation with direct assessment in assessing Language and Communication than teacher report. However, there were no significant differences between parent report and teacher report in their correlations with direct assessment for the other developmental domains. Implications of the findings for research and practice are provided.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
