Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-27DOI: 10.1037/fam0001411
Carolyn A Albright, Gregory M Fosco, Mark E Feinberg, Carlie J Sloan, Shichen Fang
This study evaluated two pathways that may help explain changes in parent mental health during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. One pathway, the preexisting vulnerability pathway, considered whether family relationship quality prior to the COVID-19 pandemic predicted parent mental health during the pandemic. The second, the family disruption pathway, considered deterioration in family relationship quality as predictive of declines in parent mental health during the pandemic. We measured family relationship quality in terms of family cohesion, conflict, and routines and predicted parent anxiety, depression, and hostility. All models included financial strain and child externalizing behavior as covariates. The sample included 204 parents who completed one survey prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, a second survey after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in May 2020, and a third survey 2 weeks after the initial survey was sent. Analyses utilized a model-building approach where separate structural equation models were calculated for each family dimension and covariate and significant findings were integrated into a single model. Results supported the preexisting vulnerabilities and disruption hypotheses. Pre-COVID-19 family conflict, financial strain, and child externalizing problems were risks for parent mental health problems. Disruption effects were evident, such that increases in family conflict and increases in financial strain each predicted worse parent mental health. Family cohesion, routines, and social support did not predict parent's mental health outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
这项研究评估了两种可能有助于解释COVID-19大流行最初几个月父母心理健康变化的途径。一条途径,即既存在的脆弱性途径,考虑了COVID-19大流行之前的家庭关系质量是否能预测大流行期间父母的心理健康状况。第二种是家庭破裂途径,认为家庭关系质量的恶化预示着大流行期间父母心理健康状况的下降。我们从家庭凝聚力、冲突和常规方面衡量家庭关系质量,并预测父母的焦虑、抑郁和敌意。所有模型都包括经济压力和儿童外化行为作为协变量。样本包括204名家长,他们在COVID-19大流行之前完成了一次调查,在2020年5月COVID-19大流行爆发后完成了第二次调查,并在首次调查发出两周后完成了第三次调查。分析采用模型构建方法,其中为每个家庭维度计算单独的结构方程模型,并将协变量和重要发现整合到单个模型中。结果支持先前存在的脆弱性和中断假设。covid -19前的家庭冲突、经济压力和儿童外化问题是父母心理健康问题的风险。破坏效应很明显,比如家庭冲突的增加和经济压力的增加都预示着父母的心理健康状况会恶化。家庭凝聚力、日常生活和社会支持不能预测父母的心理健康结果。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Family vulnerability, disruption, and parent mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Carolyn A Albright, Gregory M Fosco, Mark E Feinberg, Carlie J Sloan, Shichen Fang","doi":"10.1037/fam0001411","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fam0001411","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated two pathways that may help explain changes in parent mental health during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. One pathway, the preexisting vulnerability pathway, considered whether family relationship quality prior to the COVID-19 pandemic predicted parent mental health during the pandemic. The second, the family disruption pathway, considered deterioration in family relationship quality as predictive of declines in parent mental health during the pandemic. We measured family relationship quality in terms of family cohesion, conflict, and routines and predicted parent anxiety, depression, and hostility. All models included financial strain and child externalizing behavior as covariates. The sample included 204 parents who completed one survey prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, a second survey after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in May 2020, and a third survey 2 weeks after the initial survey was sent. Analyses utilized a model-building approach where separate structural equation models were calculated for each family dimension and covariate and significant findings were integrated into a single model. Results supported the preexisting vulnerabilities and disruption hypotheses. Pre-COVID-19 family conflict, financial strain, and child externalizing problems were risks for parent mental health problems. Disruption effects were evident, such that increases in family conflict and increases in financial strain each predicted worse parent mental health. Family cohesion, routines, and social support did not predict parent's mental health outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"49-60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12614447/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145379297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-09-11DOI: 10.1037/fam0001402
Jingyi Wang, Julianna R Calabrese, Minjung Kim, Sarah J Schoppe-Sullivan
Coparenting relationships play an important role in shaping marital satisfaction, parenting behavior, and children's social-emotional adjustment. Coparenting relationship quality can be measured via parent self-report and direct observation. Each method has its strengths and weaknesses, providing different perspectives on coparenting relationships. However, most studies rely on one method-typically mother report-to assess coparenting quality, yielding an incomplete picture of coparenting dynamics. The present study obtained maternal reports, paternal reports, and observations of coparenting relationships in 160 dual-earner different-sex parent families (86% White, 88% married) with infants. Latent profile analysis was conducted to identify patterns in coparenting relationships and their associations with child and family functioning. Four distinct coparenting relationship profiles were identified: high-convergent (42%), high-reported, moderate-observed (34%), moderate-high-reported, mother less positive, low-observed (13%), and moderate-reported, father less positive, moderate-high observed (11%). Profile membership was associated with parents' marital satisfaction, positive parental engagement, and children's social-emotional adjustment. Overall, families in the high-convergent profile had the best family and child outcomes. Even though parents in the high-reported, moderate-observed profile perceived their coparenting relationships just as positively, these families experienced greater risk for compromised family functioning and child adjustment compared to families in the high-convergent profile. Obtaining observations and fathers' reports of coparenting in addition to mothers' reports appears desirable to understand the roles of coparenting in family functioning, particularly in children's social-emotional adjustment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
亲子关系在塑造婚姻满意度、父母行为和孩子的社会情感适应方面起着重要作用。亲子关系质量可以通过父母自我报告和直接观察来衡量。每种方法都有其优点和缺点,为父母关系提供了不同的视角。然而,大多数研究依赖于一种方法——通常是母亲报告——来评估父母养育的质量,产生了一幅不完整的父母养育动态图景。本研究收集了160个不同性别的双职工家庭(白人占86%,已婚占88%)的母亲报告、父亲报告,以及对有婴儿的父母关系的观察。进行了潜在剖面分析,以确定模式的父母关系及其与儿童和家庭功能的关联。确定了四种不同的亲子关系概况:高趋同(42%),高报告,中等观察(34%),中-高报告,母亲不积极,低观察(13%),中等报告,父亲不积极,中等-高观察(11%)。档案成员与父母的婚姻满意度、积极的父母参与和儿童的社会情绪适应有关。总体而言,高度趋同的家庭拥有最好的家庭和儿童成果。尽管高报告、中等观察的父母认为他们的亲子关系同样积极,但与高趋同的家庭相比,这些家庭在家庭功能和孩子适应方面面临更大的风险。除了母亲的报告之外,还需要获得父亲对父母养育子女的观察和报告,以了解父母养育子女在家庭功能中的作用,特别是在儿童的社会情感适应方面。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Coparenting from multiple perspectives and associations with child and family functioning.","authors":"Jingyi Wang, Julianna R Calabrese, Minjung Kim, Sarah J Schoppe-Sullivan","doi":"10.1037/fam0001402","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fam0001402","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coparenting relationships play an important role in shaping marital satisfaction, parenting behavior, and children's social-emotional adjustment. Coparenting relationship quality can be measured via parent self-report and direct observation. Each method has its strengths and weaknesses, providing different perspectives on coparenting relationships. However, most studies rely on one method-typically mother report-to assess coparenting quality, yielding an incomplete picture of coparenting dynamics. The present study obtained maternal reports, paternal reports, and observations of coparenting relationships in 160 dual-earner different-sex parent families (86% White, 88% married) with infants. Latent profile analysis was conducted to identify patterns in coparenting relationships and their associations with child and family functioning. Four distinct coparenting relationship profiles were identified: high-convergent (42%), high-reported, moderate-observed (34%), moderate-high-reported, mother less positive, low-observed (13%), and moderate-reported, father less positive, moderate-high observed (11%). Profile membership was associated with parents' marital satisfaction, positive parental engagement, and children's social-emotional adjustment. Overall, families in the high-convergent profile had the best family and child outcomes. Even though parents in the high-reported, moderate-observed profile perceived their coparenting relationships just as positively, these families experienced greater risk for compromised family functioning and child adjustment compared to families in the high-convergent profile. Obtaining observations and fathers' reports of coparenting in addition to mothers' reports appears desirable to understand the roles of coparenting in family functioning, particularly in children's social-emotional adjustment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"152-158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145034354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-16DOI: 10.1037/fam0001415
Bonnie Woodward, Molly R Franz, Lauren M Laifer, Rebecca L Brock
The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic posed significant challenges for families, particularly those with young children, due to rapid shifts in routines and increased responsibilities. Corresponding increases in psychological aggression were documented. The present study examined interparental emotional intimacy and trust prior to pandemic onset as a resource facilitating successful coparenting and reducing risk for psychological aggression during the first 6 months of the pandemic in a sample of 146 couples parenting preschool-age children. Results suggest that prepandemic interparental emotional intimacy was a protective factor that promoted high quality coparenting during the first 6 months of the pandemic which, in turn, was associated with a lower probability of psychological aggression enacted toward mothers. Further, prepandemic intimacy predicted lower frequency of psychological aggression toward mothers and fathers independent of coparenting. Taken together, results point to emotional intimacy as an important interpersonal regulatory resource that supported healthy adjustment and coparenting and predicted lower risk of psychological aggression in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Programs designed to promote trust and closeness between partners and enhance the coparenting relationship may be important to facilitate family resilience during times of significant stress and adjustment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
COVID-19大流行的爆发给家庭,特别是有幼儿的家庭带来了重大挑战,因为日常生活发生了迅速变化,责任增加了。相应的,心理攻击性的增加也被记录在案。本研究以146对养育学龄前儿童的夫妇为样本,调查了在大流行爆发前父母之间的情感亲密和信任,作为一种资源,有助于在大流行爆发的前6个月成功地养育子女,并降低心理攻击的风险。结果表明,大流行前父母之间的情感亲密是一个保护因素,在大流行的前6个月促进了高质量的亲子关系,而这反过来又与对母亲实施心理攻击的可能性较低有关。此外,大流行前的亲密关系预示着对父母独立的心理攻击频率较低。综上所述,研究结果表明,情感亲密是一种重要的人际调节资源,支持健康的适应和亲子关系,并预测在COVID-19大流行背景下心理攻击的风险较低。旨在促进伴侣之间的信任和亲密关系以及加强亲子关系的项目对于促进家庭在重大压力和调整时期的恢复能力可能很重要。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Interparental processes mitigating risk for psychological aggression during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Bonnie Woodward, Molly R Franz, Lauren M Laifer, Rebecca L Brock","doi":"10.1037/fam0001415","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fam0001415","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic posed significant challenges for families, particularly those with young children, due to rapid shifts in routines and increased responsibilities. Corresponding increases in psychological aggression were documented. The present study examined interparental emotional intimacy and trust prior to pandemic onset as a resource facilitating successful coparenting and reducing risk for psychological aggression during the first 6 months of the pandemic in a sample of 146 couples parenting preschool-age children. Results suggest that prepandemic interparental emotional intimacy was a protective factor that promoted high quality coparenting during the first 6 months of the pandemic which, in turn, was associated with a lower probability of psychological aggression enacted toward mothers. Further, prepandemic intimacy predicted lower frequency of psychological aggression toward mothers and fathers independent of coparenting. Taken together, results point to emotional intimacy as an important interpersonal regulatory resource that supported healthy adjustment and coparenting and predicted lower risk of psychological aggression in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Programs designed to promote trust and closeness between partners and enhance the coparenting relationship may be important to facilitate family resilience during times of significant stress and adjustment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"61-71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12640185/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145309552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-04-07DOI: 10.1037/fam0001329
Francesca Lionetti, Maria Spinelli, Guy Bosmans, Giulio D'Urso, Mirco Fasolo, Michael Pluess
Parents are everyday exposed to intense sensory and emotional stimuli. Hence, it is reasonable that the individual trait of Environmental Sensitivity (ES), capturing individual differences in sensitivity and responsivity to stimuli, holds important implications for parenting. Available evidence suggests that a higher sensitivity to stimuli in parents is mainly a risk factor, but studies are limited for the majority to self-report measures of parenting. Across two independent observational studies involving Italian parents, we investigated the role of ES in parenting during the first year of a child life. In Study 1 (N = 41 mothers and infants tracked from 3 to 9 months), a higher ES initially linked to slightly higher parental intrusiveness at 3 months but shifted to less intrusive behaviors by 9 months. No other ES-parenting associations emerged. In Study 2 (N = 55 mothers of children aged 3 months old), findings showed that a higher ES was associated with less attuned parenting behaviors and more parental stress only in the copresence of parental adverse childhood experiences, with a vulnerability effect. In the same sample, a higher ES was associated with more adaptive parental responses to the child, particularly when respiratory sinus arrhythmia, capturing physiological self-regulation, was higher. To conclude, ES was not related to worse parental competences, but rather it made mothers more receptive to environmental (adverse childhood experiences) and inner physiological (respiratory sinus arrhythmia) factors, for better and for worse. We discuss implications for parenting programs and new direction of studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Is environmental sensitivity relevant to understand parenting? Observational studies with mothers of young children.","authors":"Francesca Lionetti, Maria Spinelli, Guy Bosmans, Giulio D'Urso, Mirco Fasolo, Michael Pluess","doi":"10.1037/fam0001329","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fam0001329","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parents are everyday exposed to intense sensory and emotional stimuli. Hence, it is reasonable that the individual trait of Environmental Sensitivity (ES), capturing individual differences in sensitivity and responsivity to stimuli, holds important implications for parenting. Available evidence suggests that a higher sensitivity to stimuli in parents is mainly a risk factor, but studies are limited for the majority to self-report measures of parenting. Across two independent observational studies involving Italian parents, we investigated the role of ES in parenting during the first year of a child life. In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 41 mothers and infants tracked from 3 to 9 months), a higher ES initially linked to slightly higher parental intrusiveness at 3 months but shifted to less intrusive behaviors by 9 months. No other ES-parenting associations emerged. In Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 55 mothers of children aged 3 months old), findings showed that a higher ES was associated with less attuned parenting behaviors and more parental stress only in the copresence of parental adverse childhood experiences, with a vulnerability effect. In the same sample, a higher ES was associated with more adaptive parental responses to the child, particularly when respiratory sinus arrhythmia, capturing physiological self-regulation, was higher. To conclude, ES was not related to worse parental competences, but rather it made mothers more receptive to environmental (adverse childhood experiences) and inner physiological (respiratory sinus arrhythmia) factors, for better and for worse. We discuss implications for parenting programs and new direction of studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"12-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143804571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-01-20DOI: 10.1037/fam0001299
Saliha B Selman, Rebecca Distefano, Janean E Dilworth-Bart, Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
Although a large body of research has documented the importance of routines for children's development, the role of developmental timing of routines has received less attention. The present study examined how use of routines across the preschool period is linked to children's socioemotional adjustment. We used Year 3 and Year 5 data from the Future of Families and Child Wellbeing Study (N = 2,353; 48% female). Child routines were measured through maternal reports of routines, including household chores, play, mealtime, and bedtime. Latent profile analysis revealed four groups based on timing and number of routines: stable-high, increasing, decreasing, and stable-low. In Year 5, parents reported on children's attentional, externalizing, and internalizing problems and social skills. Latent transition analysis indicated that most children (n = 1,782; 75%) maintained the same profiles over time. Regression analyses showed that profiles were differentially related to outcomes. After controlling for a set of confounding variables, children in the stable-high group had significantly lower attentional, externalizing, and internalizing problems than the decrease routines group (βs range from .23 to .40, p < .05). These findings contribute to the understanding of how routines are associated with child functioning and highlight the potential importance of the continued use of routines across early childhood. Children who had consistently high routines demonstrated better adjustment compared to those whose routines decreased across the preschool period. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Child routines across preschool and associations with socioemotional adjustment.","authors":"Saliha B Selman, Rebecca Distefano, Janean E Dilworth-Bart, Jeanne Brooks-Gunn","doi":"10.1037/fam0001299","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fam0001299","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although a large body of research has documented the importance of routines for children's development, the role of developmental timing of routines has received less attention. The present study examined how use of routines across the preschool period is linked to children's socioemotional adjustment. We used Year 3 and Year 5 data from the Future of Families and Child Wellbeing Study (<i>N</i> = 2,353; 48% female). Child routines were measured through maternal reports of routines, including household chores, play, mealtime, and bedtime. Latent profile analysis revealed four groups based on timing and number of routines: stable-high, increasing, decreasing, and stable-low. In Year 5, parents reported on children's attentional, externalizing, and internalizing problems and social skills. Latent transition analysis indicated that most children (<i>n</i> = 1,782; 75%) maintained the same profiles over time. Regression analyses showed that profiles were differentially related to outcomes. After controlling for a set of confounding variables, children in the stable-high group had significantly lower attentional, externalizing, and internalizing problems than the decrease routines group (βs range from .23 to .40, <i>p</i> < .05). These findings contribute to the understanding of how routines are associated with child functioning and highlight the potential importance of the continued use of routines across early childhood. Children who had consistently high routines demonstrated better adjustment compared to those whose routines decreased across the preschool period. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"25-36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276931/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marilyn A Cornish, Shilpa R Maddikunta, Cassandra J Grey, Aleah J Horton, Latifat O Cabirou
As with all types of relationships, romantic relationships will involve at least occasional instances of interpersonal harm. When one partner commits a transgression against the other, how they respond next may influence whether the situation resolves or escalates. Research has identified three main response patterns to interpersonal transgressions-self-forgiveness, self-exoneration, and self-condemnation-each with potential relationship consequences that may either support or hinder the relationship. We examined these three response tendencies with romantic partners to understand their dyadic effect on relationship quality. In our sample of 216 adults in 108 heterosexual romantic relationships of at least 1 year, we found actor and partner effects for both trait self-forgiveness and trait self-exoneration. One partner's level of trait self-forgiveness positively predicted both their own and their partner's relationship quality, and the level of trait self-exoneration negatively predicted both their own and their partner's relationship quality. Self-condemnation was not a significant predictor in our model. We did not find any sex differences in our models. We discuss the implications of these findings for couples counseling and other contexts. We also discuss the potentially complicated nature of self-condemnation in relationship functioning, addressing ways it could both help and hinder some aspects of the relationship. Overall, this study highlights the potential benefits of promoting self-forgiveness and reducing self-exoneration tendencies on relationship quality for both partners in romantic relationships where one partner has transgressed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Trait responses after interpersonal offending: A dyadic examination of effects on romantic relationship quality.","authors":"Marilyn A Cornish, Shilpa R Maddikunta, Cassandra J Grey, Aleah J Horton, Latifat O Cabirou","doi":"10.1037/fam0001448","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fam0001448","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As with all types of relationships, romantic relationships will involve at least occasional instances of interpersonal harm. When one partner commits a transgression against the other, how they respond next may influence whether the situation resolves or escalates. Research has identified three main response patterns to interpersonal transgressions-self-forgiveness, self-exoneration, and self-condemnation-each with potential relationship consequences that may either support or hinder the relationship. We examined these three response tendencies with romantic partners to understand their dyadic effect on relationship quality. In our sample of 216 adults in 108 heterosexual romantic relationships of at least 1 year, we found actor and partner effects for both trait self-forgiveness and trait self-exoneration. One partner's level of trait self-forgiveness positively predicted both their own and their partner's relationship quality, and the level of trait self-exoneration negatively predicted both their own and their partner's relationship quality. Self-condemnation was not a significant predictor in our model. We did not find any sex differences in our models. We discuss the implications of these findings for couples counseling and other contexts. We also discuss the potentially complicated nature of self-condemnation in relationship functioning, addressing ways it could both help and hinder some aspects of the relationship. Overall, this study highlights the potential benefits of promoting self-forgiveness and reducing self-exoneration tendencies on relationship quality for both partners in romantic relationships where one partner has transgressed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Father-Toddler Interaction Multiaxial Assessment (FTI-MAXA), designed to evaluate and rate the quality of father-toddler interaction. Two trained raters assessed 105 children aged 13-40 months (27.28 ± 6.7) and their fathers using a Likert-type scale (1 = very poor, 5 = very good) across 10 items: physical involvement, affective expressiveness, pleasure, responsiveness, reciprocity, joint attention, nonintrusiveness, adaptive flexibility, support, and acceptance. Each father and child pair was rated on three dimensions: involvement, reciprocity, and flexibility-acceptance. In addition, Brief Infant/Toddler Social Emotional Assessment Scale (BITSEA), Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC), Parent-Infant Relationship Global Assessment Scale, Brief Symptom Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, and Child Attachment Pattern were applied to the fathers. The internal consistency of FTI-MAXA total scores-of both scorers-was found to be excellent (Cronbach's α was .92, .96 for fathers and .98, .98 for children). Interpersonal reliability of FTI-MAXA scores was excellent for fathers and children (p < .001). FTI-MAXA-father subscores were negatively correlated with the child's ABC-total scores and positively correlated with BITSEA-competence scores. FTI-MAXA-child subscores showed positive correlation with BITSEA-competence scores and negative correlation with ABC scores. These findings underscore the validity and reliability of the FTI-MAXA, which offers dependable global ratings of father-toddler interactions in a laboratory setting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Development, reliability, and validity of Father-Toddler Interaction Multiaxial Assessment Scale.","authors":"Koray Karabekiroğlu, Ayhan Cöngöloğlu, Berkan Şahin, Merve Çıkılı-Uytun, Esra Yurumez, Şermin Yalın-Sapmaz, Didem Öztop, Berna Gündüz-Çıtır, Aylin Deniz Uzun-Çakır, Burak Çakır, Hatice Gülşen, Burcu Akın-Sarı, Yasemin Taş-Torun, Gülsüm Yitik-Tonkaz, Cansu Çobanoğlu-Osmanlı, Bedia Sultan Önal, Burçin Özlem Ateş, Oya Güleşen-Kapan, Hazal Selin Soyugür, Mustafa Dinçer, Hande Ayraler-Taner, Hatice Aksu, Elif Pekmezci-Yazgı, Hakan Öğütlü, Damla Eyüboğlu, Yusuf Yasin Gümüş, Miraç Barış Usta","doi":"10.1037/fam0001433","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fam0001433","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Father-Toddler Interaction Multiaxial Assessment (FTI-MAXA), designed to evaluate and rate the quality of father-toddler interaction. Two trained raters assessed 105 children aged 13-40 months (27.28 ± 6.7) and their fathers using a Likert-type scale (1 = <i>very poor,</i> 5 <i>= very good</i>) across 10 items: physical involvement, affective expressiveness, pleasure, responsiveness, reciprocity, joint attention, nonintrusiveness, adaptive flexibility, support, and acceptance. Each father and child pair was rated on three dimensions: involvement, reciprocity, and flexibility-acceptance. In addition, Brief Infant/Toddler Social Emotional Assessment Scale (BITSEA), Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC), Parent-Infant Relationship Global Assessment Scale, Brief Symptom Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, and Child Attachment Pattern were applied to the fathers. The internal consistency of FTI-MAXA total scores-of both scorers-was found to be excellent (Cronbach's α was .92, .96 for fathers and .98, .98 for children). Interpersonal reliability of FTI-MAXA scores was excellent for fathers and children (<i>p</i> < .001). FTI-MAXA-father subscores were negatively correlated with the child's ABC-total scores and positively correlated with BITSEA-competence scores. FTI-MAXA-child subscores showed positive correlation with BITSEA-competence scores and negative correlation with ABC scores. These findings underscore the validity and reliability of the FTI-MAXA, which offers dependable global ratings of father-toddler interactions in a laboratory setting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yan Li, Jallu Lindblom, Mervi Vänskä, Raija-Leena Punamäki, Philipp Kanske, Marjo Flykt
This preregistered study examined bidirectional associations between parental psychological distress (PD) and relationship quality (RQ) from pregnancy to children's adolescence, assessing both within-individual and cross-partner effects, and testing the strength and gender differences in these associations. Previous studies have analyzed the links between parental PD and RQ, but research covering the whole range of active parenting years in both parents is limited. Moreover, prior research has primarily focused on relationship intimacy, often overlooking autonomy and the balance between the two. This longitudinal study involved 375 intact Finnish couples who answered questionnaires on PD and RQ during pregnancy, postpartum, and the child's middle childhood and late adolescence. The associations between PD and RQ were assessed with random intercept cross-lagged panel models based on both sum and balance scores of intimacy and autonomy, and individual scales. At the state level, PD was associated with higher overall RQ (i.e., a combination of intimacy and autonomy) and higher autonomy at unique parenting stages. However, PD predicted lower intimacy and less relationship enmeshment (i.e., a combination of more autonomy than intimacy) during early parenting years. PD predicted RQ more than the reverse and fathers' RQ was more strongly predicted by mothers' distress than the corresponding prediction from fathers to mothers. At the trait level, PD and RQ showed consistently negative associations. Our findings highlight the importance of understanding how PD shapes RQ over time, emphasizing the dynamic interplay between autonomy and intimacy in family relationships throughout the parenting years. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Psychological distress and partnership quality in parents: A 20-year longitudinal study.","authors":"Yan Li, Jallu Lindblom, Mervi Vänskä, Raija-Leena Punamäki, Philipp Kanske, Marjo Flykt","doi":"10.1037/fam0001446","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fam0001446","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This preregistered study examined bidirectional associations between parental psychological distress (PD) and relationship quality (RQ) from pregnancy to children's adolescence, assessing both within-individual and cross-partner effects, and testing the strength and gender differences in these associations. Previous studies have analyzed the links between parental PD and RQ, but research covering the whole range of active parenting years in both parents is limited. Moreover, prior research has primarily focused on relationship intimacy, often overlooking autonomy and the balance between the two. This longitudinal study involved 375 intact Finnish couples who answered questionnaires on PD and RQ during pregnancy, postpartum, and the child's middle childhood and late adolescence. The associations between PD and RQ were assessed with random intercept cross-lagged panel models based on both sum and balance scores of intimacy and autonomy, and individual scales. At the state level, PD was associated with higher overall RQ (i.e., a combination of intimacy and autonomy) and higher autonomy at unique parenting stages. However, PD predicted lower intimacy and less relationship enmeshment (i.e., a combination of more autonomy than intimacy) during early parenting years. PD predicted RQ more than the reverse and fathers' RQ was more strongly predicted by mothers' distress than the corresponding prediction from fathers to mothers. At the trait level, PD and RQ showed consistently negative associations. Our findings highlight the importance of understanding how PD shapes RQ over time, emphasizing the dynamic interplay between autonomy and intimacy in family relationships throughout the parenting years. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146054640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ana Ortin-Peralta, Beverlin Rosario-Williams, Ateret P Frank Brauner, Aimee M Starr, Sajel Arya
This study examined cross-sectional and prospective differences in mental health and family functioning among caregivers aware of their child's self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs), caregivers unaware of their child's SITBs, and caregivers of children without SITBs. Data were drawn from an epidemiological U.S. sample of children (ages 9-10) and their caregivers who participated in three yearly assessments as part of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study (N = 11,303, 47.6% female). Caregivers reported on their own mental health problems and SITBs, their child's SITBs, and family conflict. Children reported on their own SITBs, family conflict, parental monitoring, and parental acceptance. Compared to caregivers of children without SITBs (81%), both aware (9.9%) and unaware (9.1%) caregivers reported more externalizing problems at baseline. Their children reported more family conflict and lower parental monitoring and acceptance across assessments. Relative to unaware caregivers and caregivers of children without SITBs, aware caregivers reported elevated internalizing problems at baseline and greater odds of engaging in SITBs at baseline and follow-up. Compared to children of unaware caregivers, children of aware caregivers reported lower family conflict and higher parental monitoring and acceptance at baseline. In contrast, aware caregivers reported higher family conflict at baseline and 1 year later compared to unaware caregivers. Overall, caregivers of children with SITBs, whether aware or unaware, experienced more mental health problems and long-term effects on family functioning. Aware caregivers also reported higher SITB risk. Family-based interventions with a focus on caregivers' mental health may help reduce children's SITBs and family suffering. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Impact of children's self-harm on caregivers' mental health and family functioning.","authors":"Ana Ortin-Peralta, Beverlin Rosario-Williams, Ateret P Frank Brauner, Aimee M Starr, Sajel Arya","doi":"10.1037/fam0001427","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fam0001427","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined cross-sectional and prospective differences in mental health and family functioning among caregivers aware of their child's self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs), caregivers unaware of their child's SITBs, and caregivers of children without SITBs. Data were drawn from an epidemiological U.S. sample of children (ages 9-10) and their caregivers who participated in three yearly assessments as part of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study (<i>N</i> = 11,303, 47.6% female). Caregivers reported on their own mental health problems and SITBs, their child's SITBs, and family conflict. Children reported on their own SITBs, family conflict, parental monitoring, and parental acceptance. Compared to caregivers of children without SITBs (81%), both aware (9.9%) and unaware (9.1%) caregivers reported more externalizing problems at baseline. Their children reported more family conflict and lower parental monitoring and acceptance across assessments. Relative to unaware caregivers and caregivers of children without SITBs, aware caregivers reported elevated internalizing problems at baseline and greater odds of engaging in SITBs at baseline and follow-up. Compared to children of unaware caregivers, children of aware caregivers reported lower family conflict and higher parental monitoring and acceptance at baseline. In contrast, aware caregivers reported higher family conflict at baseline and 1 year later compared to unaware caregivers. Overall, caregivers of children with SITBs, whether aware or unaware, experienced more mental health problems and long-term effects on family functioning. Aware caregivers also reported higher SITB risk. Family-based interventions with a focus on caregivers' mental health may help reduce children's SITBs and family suffering. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146054647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lara Stas, William L Cook, Leila Van Imschoot, Tom Loeys
The study of dyadic data has become essential to understanding family relationships. While directed dyadic data capture a person's relationship to a partner, resulting in two scores per dyad, undirected dyadic data measure something that is common to two people using a single score, for example, the distance two people stand from each other while conversing. This article introduces a modification of the family social relations model specifically developed for undirected data, a new framework to analyze undirected data for distinguishable dyad members. The model allows researchers to determine the contribution of individual-, dyadic-, and family-level components on undirected measures. We illustrate the model using data on shared family meals among dyad members in 99 two-parent two-child families. The analysis reveals that factors at all three levels of analysis determine how often two family members share a meal, but characteristics of the family as a group are most important. We also introduce an innovative approach to estimating the family factor, one that allows different dyadic scores to be affected differently by the family climate. Finally, we introduce an online app that implements the analysis of the family social relations model for undirected data, minimizing the need for confirmatory factor analysis skills. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Introducing the social relations model for undirected data.","authors":"Lara Stas, William L Cook, Leila Van Imschoot, Tom Loeys","doi":"10.1037/fam0001440","DOIUrl":"10.1037/fam0001440","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study of dyadic data has become essential to understanding family relationships. While directed dyadic data capture a person's relationship to a partner, resulting in two scores per dyad, undirected dyadic data measure something that is common to two people using a single score, for example, the distance two people stand from each other while conversing. This article introduces a modification of the family social relations model specifically developed for undirected data, a new framework to analyze undirected data for distinguishable dyad members. The model allows researchers to determine the contribution of individual-, dyadic-, and family-level components on undirected measures. We illustrate the model using data on shared family meals among dyad members in 99 two-parent two-child families. The analysis reveals that factors at all three levels of analysis determine how often two family members share a meal, but characteristics of the family as a group are most important. We also introduce an innovative approach to estimating the family factor, one that allows different dyadic scores to be affected differently by the family climate. Finally, we introduce an online app that implements the analysis of the family social relations model for undirected data, minimizing the need for confirmatory factor analysis skills. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146054583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}