首页 > 最新文献

Developmental Science最新文献

英文 中文
No Evidence for Curiosity-Driven Information Selection Advantage in Infants’ Novel Word Learning 没有证据表明好奇心驱动的信息选择优势在婴儿新单词学习中的作用
IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-11-28 DOI: 10.1111/desc.70101
Marina Bazhydai, Malcolm K. Y. Wong, Elena Constanze Altmann, Samuel David Jones, Gert Westermann

The cognitive mechanisms and benefits of active learning in early child development are poorly understood. The current study investigated 20–23-month-old infants’ curiosity-driven information selection in a novel word learning task, designed to identify any potential advantage for active learning over passive learning. In a gaze-contingent eye-tracking paradigm, infants in one condition were given the opportunity to structure their own information seeking to actively create word learning opportunities for themselves, while infants in two other conditions engaged in learning novel words passively. Infants’ learning of word-object associations was compared across active and passive learning paradigms. The results indicate no advantage of active information selection on retention of novel words above and beyond passive learning, with infants across all conditions retaining novel words above chance. This study provides a crucial insight advancing our understanding of early word learning, and of the mechanisms and benefits of active, curiosity-based learning in infants.

Summary

  • We investigated the effect of active, curiosity-driven word learning, as compared to passive word learning, on infants’ label recognition.
  • Infants’ self-motivated information selection was tested using a novel word learning task in a gaze-contingent eye-tracking paradigm.
  • Self-motivated information selection had no effect on early word learning above and beyond passive learning, with infants across all conditions retaining novel words above chance.
  • This provides novel insights into infants’ active and passive learning for language acquisition.
儿童早期发展中主动学习的认知机制和益处尚不清楚。目前的研究调查了20 - 23个月大的婴儿在一个新单词学习任务中的好奇心驱动的信息选择,旨在确定主动学习比被动学习的任何潜在优势。在注视偶然眼动追踪范式中,一种情况下的婴儿有机会构建自己的信息,寻求积极地为自己创造单词学习机会,而另外两种情况下的婴儿则被动地学习新单词。比较了婴儿在主动学习范式和被动学习范式下的词-物联想学习。结果表明,主动信息选择在新单词的记忆上并没有比被动学习更有优势,在所有条件下,婴儿对新单词的记忆都高于偶然。这项研究提供了一个重要的见解,促进我们对早期单词学习的理解,以及对婴儿主动的、基于好奇心的学习的机制和好处的理解。我们研究了主动的、好奇心驱动的单词学习,与被动的单词学习相比,对婴儿标签识别的影响。采用一种新颖的词汇学习任务,在注视条件下进行了婴儿自我激励信息选择的测试。在被动学习之外,自我激励信息选择对早期单词学习没有影响,在所有条件下,婴儿都能以高于偶然的机会记住新单词。这为婴儿语言习得的主动和被动学习提供了新的见解。
{"title":"No Evidence for Curiosity-Driven Information Selection Advantage in Infants’ Novel Word Learning","authors":"Marina Bazhydai,&nbsp;Malcolm K. Y. Wong,&nbsp;Elena Constanze Altmann,&nbsp;Samuel David Jones,&nbsp;Gert Westermann","doi":"10.1111/desc.70101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.70101","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The cognitive mechanisms and benefits of active learning in early child development are poorly understood. The current study investigated 20–23-month-old infants’ curiosity-driven information selection in a novel word learning task, designed to identify any potential advantage for active learning over passive learning. In a gaze-contingent eye-tracking paradigm, infants in one condition were given the opportunity to structure their own information seeking to actively create word learning opportunities for themselves, while infants in two other conditions engaged in learning novel words passively. Infants’ learning of word-object associations was compared across active and passive learning paradigms. The results indicate no advantage of active information selection on retention of novel words above and beyond passive learning, with infants across all conditions retaining novel words above chance. This study provides a crucial insight advancing our understanding of early word learning, and of the mechanisms and benefits of active, curiosity-based learning in infants.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Summary</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>We investigated the effect of active, curiosity-driven word learning, as compared to passive word learning, on infants’ label recognition.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Infants’ self-motivated information selection was tested using a novel word learning task in a gaze-contingent eye-tracking paradigm.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Self-motivated information selection had no effect on early word learning above and beyond passive learning, with infants across all conditions retaining novel words above chance.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>This provides novel insights into infants’ active and passive learning for language acquisition.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.70101","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145626812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Choosing the One Who Sees You: Emotional Responsiveness as a Cue in Children's Help-Seeking 选择一个看到你的人:情感反应作为儿童寻求帮助的线索。
IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1111/desc.70095
Minji Kim, Jeewon Jeon, Gerardo Ramirez, Daeun Park

Prior research has explored children's help-seeking tendencies in relation to the characteristics of help providers with a primary focus on the helper's competencies. In the current study, we propose that acknowledging a child's emotions without judgment, referred to as emotional validation, is another cue that guides children's help-seeking behavior. In Study 1, we surveyed mothers of children aged 3–6 years (N = 200) and found that their tendency to validate their children's emotions was positively associated with the children's help-seeking behavior, particularly among older children (5–6 years). In Study 2, a randomized experiment with children aged 3–6 years (N = 68) tested the causal effect of emotional validation on help-seeking behaviors. When presented with a challenging task, older children (5–6 years) were more likely to seek help from an emotion-validating adult than an emotion-invalidating adult. This pattern was not observed in younger children (3–4 years). These findings underscore the fact that by around the age of 5, children begin to integrate emotional validation into their social evaluations, using it as a critical cue in deciding whom to approach for help. This developmental shift highlights the role of emotional validation in fostering supportive relationships and promoting adaptive help-seeking behaviors.

Summary

  • Preschoolers are selective when choosing whom to seek help from.
  • Children prefer to seek help from an emotionally validating responder.
  • This preference was particularly evident among older preschoolers (ages 5–6), but not among younger ones (ages 3–4).
先前的研究探讨了儿童的求助倾向与帮助提供者的特征之间的关系,主要关注帮助者的能力。在目前的研究中,我们提出,不加评判地承认孩子的情绪,即情感确认,是指导孩子寻求帮助行为的另一个线索。在研究1中,我们调查了3-6岁儿童的母亲(N = 200),发现她们对孩子情绪的认同倾向与孩子的求助行为呈正相关,尤其是在大一点的孩子(5-6岁)中。研究2采用3 ~ 6岁儿童(N = 68)的随机实验,检验了情绪验证对求助行为的因果效应。当面对一项具有挑战性的任务时,年龄较大的孩子(5-6岁)更有可能向情绪认同的成年人寻求帮助,而不是情绪否定的成年人。在年龄较小的儿童(3-4岁)中未观察到这种模式。这些发现强调了这样一个事实,即到5岁左右,孩子们开始将情感认可融入到他们的社会评估中,并将其作为决定向谁寻求帮助的关键线索。这种发展转变强调了情感确认在培养支持性关系和促进适应性寻求帮助行为方面的作用。学龄前儿童在选择向谁寻求帮助时是有选择性的。孩子们更喜欢从情感上认可的回应者那里寻求帮助。这种偏好在年龄较大的学龄前儿童(5-6岁)中尤为明显,但在年龄较小的儿童(3-4岁)中则不明显。
{"title":"Choosing the One Who Sees You: Emotional Responsiveness as a Cue in Children's Help-Seeking","authors":"Minji Kim,&nbsp;Jeewon Jeon,&nbsp;Gerardo Ramirez,&nbsp;Daeun Park","doi":"10.1111/desc.70095","DOIUrl":"10.1111/desc.70095","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Prior research has explored children's help-seeking tendencies in relation to the characteristics of help providers with a primary focus on the helper's competencies. In the current study, we propose that acknowledging a child's emotions without judgment, referred to as emotional validation, is another cue that guides children's help-seeking behavior. In Study 1, we surveyed mothers of children aged 3–6 years (<i>N</i> = 200) and found that their tendency to validate their children's emotions was positively associated with the children's help-seeking behavior, particularly among older children (5–6 years). In Study 2, a randomized experiment with children aged 3–6 years (<i>N</i> = 68) tested the causal effect of emotional validation on help-seeking behaviors. When presented with a challenging task, older children (5–6 years) were more likely to seek help from an emotion-validating adult than an emotion-invalidating adult. This pattern was not observed in younger children (3–4 years). These findings underscore the fact that by around the age of 5, children begin to integrate emotional validation into their social evaluations, using it as a critical cue in deciding whom to approach for help. This developmental shift highlights the role of emotional validation in fostering supportive relationships and promoting adaptive help-seeking behaviors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Summary</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Preschoolers are selective when choosing whom to seek help from.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Children prefer to seek help from an emotionally validating responder.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>This preference was particularly evident among older preschoolers (ages 5–6), but not among younger ones (ages 3–4).</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.70095","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145606897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Computationally Probing the Role of Time-Limited Neuronal Plasticity in Early Visual Development 计算探索时间限制神经元可塑性在早期视觉发育中的作用
IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-11-22 DOI: 10.1111/desc.70099
Marin Vogelsang, Lukas Vogelsang, Pawan Sinha
<div> <section> <p>In the first months or years of life, newborns learn to perceive their environment at a remarkable pace. This capacity is often attributed to heightened neuronal plasticity that diminishes over time. While this decline in plasticity could be seen as constituting a mere biological constraint, we ask whether it might, in fact, serve an adaptive function. A natural consequence of time-limited plasticity is the preservation of sensory processing mechanisms formed early in life. Emerging evidence has supported the “adaptive initial degradation” hypothesis, which posits that early experience with degraded sensory inputs, such as blurred or color-reduced vision, helps instantiate important sensory mechanisms subserving robust perception later in life. Here, we employ deep neural networks as computational models to systematically probe how developmental improvements in visual fidelity interact with diminishing plasticity, modeled via decreasing learning rates. Across both acuity and color domains, we find that time-limited plasticity yields modest performance gains and helps stabilize early-formed representations. However, these improvements remain surprisingly modest. Further analysis of the networks’ internal representations also reveals that earlier layers stabilize sooner than deeper layers, loosely paralleling findings from biological development. Overall, our results suggest that while declining plasticity can confer small benefits, it is not the primary force behind the more pronounced advantages of commencing visual experience with degraded inputs. These insights refine the “adaptive initial degradation” hypothesis and, more broadly, underscore how computational modeling can shed light on longstanding questions in developmental neuroscience.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Summary</h3> <div> <ul> <li>Time-limited neuronal plasticity is often viewed as a mere biological constraint. However, might it provide adaptive advantages by preserving sensory mechanisms learned early in development?</li> <li>Simulations with initially degraded sensory inputs reveal modest performance gains when modeling time-limited plasticity as decreasing learning rates.</li> <li>Despite these gains, plasticity reductions contribute less than the benefits conferred by starting with degraded inputs, refining the “adaptive initial degradation” hypothesis.</li> <li>These results underscore the utility of computational models to illuminate questions in developmental neuroscience and point to interesting future research avenues.</li> </ul> </div> </section>
在生命的最初几个月或几年里,新生儿以惊人的速度学习感知环境。这种能力通常归因于随着时间的推移而减弱的神经元可塑性的增强。虽然这种可塑性的下降可以被视为仅仅是一种生物限制,但我们想知道,它是否实际上具有适应功能。有时间限制的可塑性的一个自然结果是保存了生命早期形成的感觉处理机制。新出现的证据支持“适应性初始退化”假说,该假说认为,早期感官输入退化的经历,如视觉模糊或颜色减少,有助于实例化重要的感官机制,为以后的生活提供强大的感知。在这里,我们采用深度神经网络作为计算模型,系统地探索视觉保真度的发展改善如何与可塑性的减少相互作用,通过降低学习率来建模。在敏锐度和颜色域,我们发现时间限制的可塑性产生适度的性能提升,并有助于稳定早期形成的表征。然而,这些改善仍然令人惊讶地温和。对网络内部表征的进一步分析也表明,较早的层比较深的层稳定得更快,这与生物发育的发现大致相似。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,虽然可塑性下降可以带来小的好处,但它并不是以退化输入开始视觉体验的更明显优势背后的主要力量。这些见解完善了“适应性初始退化”假说,更广泛地说,强调了计算建模如何能够阐明发育神经科学中长期存在的问题。时间限制的神经元可塑性通常被视为一种单纯的生物学限制。然而,它是否可以通过保存在发育早期习得的感觉机制来提供适应性优势呢?模拟最初退化的感官输入显示适度的性能增益建模时,有限的可塑性学习率下降。尽管有这些收益,可塑性减少的贡献不如从退化的投入开始所带来的好处,完善了“适应性初始退化”假说。这些结果强调了计算模型在阐明发育神经科学问题方面的效用,并指出了有趣的未来研究途径。
{"title":"Computationally Probing the Role of Time-Limited Neuronal Plasticity in Early Visual Development","authors":"Marin Vogelsang,&nbsp;Lukas Vogelsang,&nbsp;Pawan Sinha","doi":"10.1111/desc.70099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.70099","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;In the first months or years of life, newborns learn to perceive their environment at a remarkable pace. This capacity is often attributed to heightened neuronal plasticity that diminishes over time. While this decline in plasticity could be seen as constituting a mere biological constraint, we ask whether it might, in fact, serve an adaptive function. A natural consequence of time-limited plasticity is the preservation of sensory processing mechanisms formed early in life. Emerging evidence has supported the “adaptive initial degradation” hypothesis, which posits that early experience with degraded sensory inputs, such as blurred or color-reduced vision, helps instantiate important sensory mechanisms subserving robust perception later in life. Here, we employ deep neural networks as computational models to systematically probe how developmental improvements in visual fidelity interact with diminishing plasticity, modeled via decreasing learning rates. Across both acuity and color domains, we find that time-limited plasticity yields modest performance gains and helps stabilize early-formed representations. However, these improvements remain surprisingly modest. Further analysis of the networks’ internal representations also reveals that earlier layers stabilize sooner than deeper layers, loosely paralleling findings from biological development. Overall, our results suggest that while declining plasticity can confer small benefits, it is not the primary force behind the more pronounced advantages of commencing visual experience with degraded inputs. These insights refine the “adaptive initial degradation” hypothesis and, more broadly, underscore how computational modeling can shed light on longstanding questions in developmental neuroscience.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Summary&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;div&gt;\u0000 &lt;ul&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;Time-limited neuronal plasticity is often viewed as a mere biological constraint. However, might it provide adaptive advantages by preserving sensory mechanisms learned early in development?&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;Simulations with initially degraded sensory inputs reveal modest performance gains when modeling time-limited plasticity as decreasing learning rates.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;Despite these gains, plasticity reductions contribute less than the benefits conferred by starting with degraded inputs, refining the “adaptive initial degradation” hypothesis.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;These results underscore the utility of computational models to illuminate questions in developmental neuroscience and point to interesting future research avenues.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 &lt;/ul&gt;\u0000 &lt;/div&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.70099","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145581194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Role of Bilingualism in the Neuroanatomical Differences in Children With Reading Disability (dyslexia) 双语在阅读障碍儿童神经解剖学差异中的作用。
IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-11-17 DOI: 10.1111/desc.70086
Alison K. Schug, Guinevere F. Eden

The left-hemisphere language cortex is known to be structurally aberrant in developmental dyslexia (also referred to as reading disability, RD). However, studies have not addressed the neuroanatomical bases of dyslexia in bilinguals, even though bilingualism is common, and the bilingual experience is thought to alter the language cortex. This raises the question of whether current brain-based models of dyslexia are applicable to bilinguals. We employed a factorial analysis with participants from the ABCD Study (total N = 268, aged 9–10 years), comparing Bilinguals with RD, Bilingual Controls, Monolinguals with RD, and Monolingual Controls on gray matter volume (GMV) and cortical thickness (CT). RD was determined for reading in English. We included only cultural early bilinguals of Spanish and English; these are prevalent in the United States and represent a homogeneous group of bilinguals who learned their languages early in their home environment. Both main effects analyses (RD vs. Control; Bilingual vs. Monolingual) yielded results for GMV and, to a lesser extent for CT, and the effects for bilingualism were more pronounced than those for dyslexia. Importantly, the interaction analysis revealed no exponential effect, indicating that the neuroanatomical signature of dyslexia is not compounded by experience-dependent plasticity associated with early bilingualism. Our results suggest that brain-based models of dyslexia derived from monolinguals can be generalized to early bilinguals. They also reveal no differences in left-hemisphere language cortex in dyslexia (main effects analysis of RD vs. Controls), suggesting that prior results of GMV and CT differences in these regions from smaller studies may not have been robust.

Summary

  • Neuroanatomical aberrations in dyslexia have been reported in left-hemisphere language cortex, but this work is based primarily on monolingual participants.
  • We tested for the first time if aberrations of gray matter volume and cortical thickness in reading disability (RD) are magnified by a dual language-experience.
  • An ANOVA of Bilinguals with and without RD and Monolinguals with and without RD resulted in no exponential effect of bilingual experience.
  • The main effect for RD revealed no differences in left language cortex and far fewer regions than those revealed by the main effect of bilingualism.
在发展性阅读障碍(也称为阅读障碍,RD)中,左半球语言皮层在结构上是异常的。然而,尽管双语很常见,而且双语经历被认为会改变语言皮层,但研究并没有解决双语者阅读障碍的神经解剖学基础。这就提出了一个问题,即当前基于大脑的阅读障碍模型是否适用于双语者。我们对ABCD研究的参与者(总N = 268,年龄9-10岁)进行了因子分析,比较了双语组、双语对照组、单语组和单语对照组在灰质体积(GMV)和皮质厚度(CT)方面的差异。RD被确定为英语阅读。我们只包括西班牙语和英语的文化早期双语者;这些在美国很普遍,代表了一个同质的双语群体,他们在家庭环境中很早就学会了语言。两种主要效应分析(RD vs. Control;双语vs.单语)都对GMV和CT产生了结果,对双语的影响比对阅读障碍的影响更明显,但对CT的影响较小。重要的是,相互作用分析显示没有指数效应,这表明阅读障碍的神经解剖学特征并没有与早期双语相关的经验依赖可塑性相结合。我们的研究结果表明,源自单语者的基于大脑的阅读障碍模型可以推广到早期双语者。他们还发现,阅读障碍患者的左半球语言皮层没有差异(RD与对照组的主要效应分析),这表明,先前在这些区域的GMV和CT差异研究结果可能不太可靠。摘要:阅读障碍患者的左半球语言皮层有神经解剖学畸变的报道,但这项工作主要是基于单语参与者。我们首次测试了阅读障碍(RD)的灰质体积和皮质厚度的畸变是否被双重语言体验放大。对双语者和非双语者、单语者和非双语者进行方差分析发现,双语体验没有指数效应。RD的主效应在左语言皮质上没有差异,而且远少于双语主效应所显示的区域。
{"title":"Role of Bilingualism in the Neuroanatomical Differences in Children With Reading Disability (dyslexia)","authors":"Alison K. Schug,&nbsp;Guinevere F. Eden","doi":"10.1111/desc.70086","DOIUrl":"10.1111/desc.70086","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The left-hemisphere language cortex is known to be structurally aberrant in developmental dyslexia (also referred to as reading disability, RD). However, studies have not addressed the neuroanatomical bases of dyslexia in bilinguals, even though bilingualism is common, and the bilingual experience is thought to alter the language cortex. This raises the question of whether current brain-based models of dyslexia are applicable to bilinguals. We employed a factorial analysis with participants from the ABCD Study (total <i>N</i> = 268, aged 9–10 years), comparing Bilinguals with RD, Bilingual Controls, Monolinguals with RD, and Monolingual Controls on gray matter volume (GMV) and cortical thickness (CT). RD was determined for reading in English. We included only cultural early bilinguals of Spanish and English; these are prevalent in the United States and represent a homogeneous group of bilinguals who learned their languages early in their home environment. Both main effects analyses (RD vs. Control; Bilingual vs. Monolingual) yielded results for GMV and, to a lesser extent for CT, and the effects for bilingualism were more pronounced than those for dyslexia. Importantly, the interaction analysis revealed no exponential effect, indicating that the neuroanatomical signature of dyslexia is not compounded by experience-dependent plasticity associated with early bilingualism. Our results suggest that brain-based models of dyslexia derived from monolinguals can be generalized to early bilinguals. They also reveal no differences in left-hemisphere language cortex in dyslexia (main effects analysis of RD vs. Controls), suggesting that prior results of GMV and CT differences in these regions from smaller studies may not have been robust.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Summary</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Neuroanatomical aberrations in dyslexia have been reported in left-hemisphere language cortex, but this work is based primarily on monolingual participants.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>We tested for the first time if aberrations of gray matter volume and cortical thickness in reading disability (RD) are magnified by a dual language-experience.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>An ANOVA of Bilinguals with and without RD and Monolinguals with and without RD resulted in no exponential effect of bilingual experience.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The main effect for RD revealed no differences in left language cortex and far fewer regions than those revealed by the main effect of bilingualism.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145543397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Children and Young Adults Factor Merit Into Their Judgments of Gender-Based Science Resource Inequalities 儿童和青少年对基于性别的科学资源不平等的判断中会考虑绩效因素。
IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-11-16 DOI: 10.1111/desc.70096
Marley B. Forbes, Riley N. Sims, Melanie Killen
<div> <section> <p>Inequalities in access to important resources and opportunities between social groups persist throughout societies worldwide. Social psychological research has shown that adults often use meritocratic beliefs to justify the existence of such inequalities. Yet, the developmental origins of meritocratic beliefs have yet to be fully explored. This study investigated how children and young adults (<i>N</i> = 144; 5- to 6-year-olds, <i>M</i> = 5.83, <i>SD</i> = 0.97; 9- to 11-year-olds, <i>M</i> = 10.74, <i>SD</i> = 0.68; 18- to 22-year-olds, <i>M</i> = 19.92, <i>SD</i> = 1.10) factored information about merit into their moral judgments and reasoning about science education resource inequalities between groups of girls and boys. Confirming our hypotheses, participants overall judged inequalities that disadvantaged high-merit groups more negatively than inequalities that disadvantaged low-merit groups, regardless of which gender group was disadvantaged. Further, exploratory analyses revealed age-related differences in judgments of inequalities that disadvantaged girls, but not boys. Whereas all age groups judged inequalities that disadvantaged boys more negatively when boys were described as high-merit compared to low-merit, only older children judged inequalities that disadvantaged girls more negatively when girls were described as high-merit compared to low-merit. Age-related differences also emerged for participants’ reasoning about inequalities, such that older children were more likely to reason about merit, and less likely to reason about equality, compared to both younger children and young adults. These novel findings offer insights into how concerns for merit shape individuals’ moral judgments of social inequalities throughout childhood and young adulthood.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Summary</h3> <div> <ul> <li>Overall, children and young adults judged inequalities of science resources that disadvantaged high-merit groups more negatively than inequalities that disadvantaged low-merit groups.</li> <li>More positive judgments of inequalities were associated with a lower likelihood of reasoning about equality and a higher likelihood of reasoning about merit.</li> <li>Older children were more likely to reason about merit and less likely to reason about equality compared to both younger children and young adults.</li> <li>Exploratory analyses showed age-related differences in the extent to which participants factored merit into their judgments of inequalities that disadvantaged girls, but not boys.</li> </ul> </div> </sect
在获得重要资源和机会方面,社会群体之间的不平等现象在世界各地的社会中仍然存在。社会心理学研究表明,成年人经常用精英主义信仰来为这种不平等的存在辩护。然而,精英主义信仰的发展起源尚未得到充分探索。本研究调查了儿童和青少年(N = 144; 5- 6岁,M = 5.83, SD = 0.97; 9- 11岁,M = 10.74, SD = 0.68; 18- 22岁,M = 19.92, SD = 1.10)在对男女群体之间科学教育资源不平等的道德判断和推理中如何考虑美德信息。证实了我们的假设,无论哪个性别群体处于劣势,参与者总体上对弱势高绩效群体的不平等比弱势低绩效群体的不平等更消极。进一步,探索性分析揭示了与年龄相关的对不平等判断的差异,这种差异不利于女孩,而不利于男孩。当男孩被描述为高人一等而不是低人一等时,所有年龄组的孩子对弱势男孩的不平等更有负面评价,只有年龄较大的孩子对弱势女孩的不平等更有负面评价,当女孩被描述为高人一等而不是低人一等时。与年龄相关的差异也出现在参与者对不平等的推理上,例如,与年幼的孩子和年轻人相比,年龄较大的孩子更有可能推理优点,而不太可能推理平等。这些新颖的发现为我们提供了关于个人在童年和青年时期对社会不平等的道德判断是如何形成的见解。摘要:总体而言,儿童和年轻人对高水平群体的科学资源不平等的评价比低水平群体的不平等更消极。对不平等的更积极的判断与更低的关于平等的推理可能性和更高的关于优点的推理可能性相关。与年幼的孩子和年轻人相比,年龄较大的孩子更倾向于考虑优点,而不太可能考虑平等。探索性分析显示,参与者在对不平等的判断中考虑优点的程度与年龄有关,这对女孩不利,但对男孩没有影响。
{"title":"Children and Young Adults Factor Merit Into Their Judgments of Gender-Based Science Resource Inequalities","authors":"Marley B. Forbes,&nbsp;Riley N. Sims,&nbsp;Melanie Killen","doi":"10.1111/desc.70096","DOIUrl":"10.1111/desc.70096","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Inequalities in access to important resources and opportunities between social groups persist throughout societies worldwide. Social psychological research has shown that adults often use meritocratic beliefs to justify the existence of such inequalities. Yet, the developmental origins of meritocratic beliefs have yet to be fully explored. This study investigated how children and young adults (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 144; 5- to 6-year-olds, &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt; = 5.83, &lt;i&gt;SD&lt;/i&gt; = 0.97; 9- to 11-year-olds, &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt; = 10.74, &lt;i&gt;SD&lt;/i&gt; = 0.68; 18- to 22-year-olds, &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt; = 19.92, &lt;i&gt;SD&lt;/i&gt; = 1.10) factored information about merit into their moral judgments and reasoning about science education resource inequalities between groups of girls and boys. Confirming our hypotheses, participants overall judged inequalities that disadvantaged high-merit groups more negatively than inequalities that disadvantaged low-merit groups, regardless of which gender group was disadvantaged. Further, exploratory analyses revealed age-related differences in judgments of inequalities that disadvantaged girls, but not boys. Whereas all age groups judged inequalities that disadvantaged boys more negatively when boys were described as high-merit compared to low-merit, only older children judged inequalities that disadvantaged girls more negatively when girls were described as high-merit compared to low-merit. Age-related differences also emerged for participants’ reasoning about inequalities, such that older children were more likely to reason about merit, and less likely to reason about equality, compared to both younger children and young adults. These novel findings offer insights into how concerns for merit shape individuals’ moral judgments of social inequalities throughout childhood and young adulthood.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Summary&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;div&gt;\u0000 &lt;ul&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;Overall, children and young adults judged inequalities of science resources that disadvantaged high-merit groups more negatively than inequalities that disadvantaged low-merit groups.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;More positive judgments of inequalities were associated with a lower likelihood of reasoning about equality and a higher likelihood of reasoning about merit.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;Older children were more likely to reason about merit and less likely to reason about equality compared to both younger children and young adults.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;Exploratory analyses showed age-related differences in the extent to which participants factored merit into their judgments of inequalities that disadvantaged girls, but not boys.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 &lt;/ul&gt;\u0000 &lt;/div&gt;\u0000 &lt;/sect","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12620542/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145533863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Development of Audio-Tactile Spatial Integration: Unraveling Vision's Contribution 听觉-触觉空间整合的发展:揭示视觉的贡献。
IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-11-14 DOI: 10.1111/desc.70094
Alessia Tonelli, Irene Senna, Maria Bianca Amadeo, Walter Setti, Nicola Domenici, Sabrina Signorini, Elena Cocchi, Giuseppina Giammari, Sandra Strazzer, Francesca Tinelli, Paola Camicione, Massimiliano Serafino, Monica Gori

Vision is considered the dominant sense for spatial perception. Yet, how vision contributes to its refinement in other modalities remains unclear. Consequently, we investigated the development of audio-tactile spatial integration using a localization task in which participants had to determine the position of auditory, tactile, and audio-tactile stimuli and the influence of visual experience in this process. We tested sighted and blind children at different ages. We found that in sighted children, tactile spatial perception stabilizes earlier than the auditory one, and optimal audio-tactile integration is achieved only after 12 years-of-age. Conversely, blind children showed higher uni-sensory precisions from a younger age, although multisensory performance exhibited minimal improvement through age. Overall, our findings suggest that optimal audio-tactile spatial integration develops late during childhood and that vision might play a pivotal role in this process, that is, the absence of vision prompts earlier development of other sensory modalities when processing bodily stimuli.

Summary

  • Sighted children achieve optimal audio-tactile spatial integration only after 12 years, aligning bimodal precision with MLE predictions in adolescence.
  • Blind children show superior early uni-modal sensory localization precision compared to sighted peers.
  • Tactile precision stabilizes earlier than auditory in sighted children, whereas blind children show the opposite developmental trajectory for localization.
视觉被认为是空间感知的主导感觉。然而,视觉如何促进其在其他形式的改进仍不清楚。因此,我们通过定位任务研究了听觉-触觉空间整合的发展,在定位任务中,参与者必须确定听觉、触觉和听觉-触觉刺激的位置,以及视觉经验在这一过程中的影响。我们测试了不同年龄的视力正常和失明儿童。我们发现,在视力正常的儿童中,触觉空间知觉比听觉空间知觉稳定得更早,并且在12岁之后才达到最佳的听觉-触觉整合。相反,盲童从小就表现出更高的单感官精确性,尽管随着年龄的增长,多感官表现的改善微乎其微。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,最佳的听觉-触觉空间整合在儿童时期发展较晚,视觉可能在这一过程中发挥关键作用,也就是说,在处理身体刺激时,视觉的缺失会促进其他感觉模式的早期发展。摘要:视力正常的儿童只有在12岁后才能达到最佳的听觉-触觉空间整合,这与青春期MLE预测的双峰精度一致。盲童早期单模感觉定位精度优于正常儿童。视力儿童的触觉精度比听觉稳定得早,而盲童的定位发展轨迹则相反。
{"title":"The Development of Audio-Tactile Spatial Integration: Unraveling Vision's Contribution","authors":"Alessia Tonelli,&nbsp;Irene Senna,&nbsp;Maria Bianca Amadeo,&nbsp;Walter Setti,&nbsp;Nicola Domenici,&nbsp;Sabrina Signorini,&nbsp;Elena Cocchi,&nbsp;Giuseppina Giammari,&nbsp;Sandra Strazzer,&nbsp;Francesca Tinelli,&nbsp;Paola Camicione,&nbsp;Massimiliano Serafino,&nbsp;Monica Gori","doi":"10.1111/desc.70094","DOIUrl":"10.1111/desc.70094","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Vision is considered the dominant sense for spatial perception. Yet, how vision contributes to its refinement in other modalities remains unclear. Consequently, we investigated the development of audio-tactile spatial integration using a localization task in which participants had to determine the position of auditory, tactile, and audio-tactile stimuli and the influence of visual experience in this process. We tested sighted and blind children at different ages. We found that in sighted children, tactile spatial perception stabilizes earlier than the auditory one, and optimal audio-tactile integration is achieved only after 12 years-of-age. Conversely, blind children showed higher uni-sensory precisions from a younger age, although multisensory performance exhibited minimal improvement through age. Overall, our findings suggest that optimal audio-tactile spatial integration develops late during childhood and that vision might play a pivotal role in this process, that is, the absence of vision prompts earlier development of other sensory modalities when processing bodily stimuli.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Summary</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Sighted children achieve optimal audio-tactile spatial integration only after 12 years, aligning bimodal precision with MLE predictions in adolescence.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Blind children show superior early uni-modal sensory localization precision compared to sighted peers.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Tactile precision stabilizes earlier than auditory in sighted children, whereas blind children show the opposite developmental trajectory for localization.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.70094","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145514527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Functional Connectivity Alterations in Developmental Dyslexia: A Meta-Analysis of Task-Based and Resting-State fMRI Studies 发展性阅读障碍的功能连接改变:基于任务和静息状态fMRI研究的meta分析。
IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-11-12 DOI: 10.1111/desc.70093
Junzhe Wang, Yang Yang, Jinqiu Liu, Huan Ren, Hong-Yan Bi

Developmental dyslexia (DD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder that significantly affects academic learning and social development. Although numerous brain regions have been implicated in DD under both task-based and resting-state conditions, dysfunctions in large-scale functional coordination across brain systems in DD remains poorly understood. Using AES-SDM, we conducted a meta-analysis of seed-based whole-brain functional connectivity (FC) studies, including 12 task-based studies with 226 dyslexics and 232 age-matched controls, and 7 resting-state studies with 120 dyslexics and 145 controls. Results revealed consistently reduced FC between the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and the left fusiform gyrus (FFG) in dyslexics compared with age-matched controls across both task and resting states, suggesting a core neural pathway underlying DD. In addition, task-specific abnormalities were identified, including hypoconnectivity between the left IFG and the right cerebellum, and hyperconnectivity between the left IFG and the bilateral angular gyrus (AG), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and left thalamus. By contrast, resting-state analyses identified additional hypoconnectivity between the left FFG and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). Together, these findings suggest that DD is associated with widespread disruption in functional integration across the brain, shedding new light on its neural mechanisms of DD and pointing to potential connectivity-based biomarkers for diagnosis.

Summary

  • Dyslexics exhibited consistent hypoconnectivity between the left inferior frontal gyrus and the left fusiform gyrus across both task and resting conditions.
  • Under the task condition, dyslexics showed specific hypoconnectivity between the left inferior frontal gyrus and the right cerebellum, and hyperconnectivity with the bilateral angular gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and left thalamus.
  • Under the resting condition, dyslexics showed specific hypoconnectivity between the left fusiform gyrus and the posterior cingulate cortex.
发展性阅读障碍(DD)是一种普遍存在的神经发育障碍,严重影响学术学习和社会发展。尽管在任务型和静息状态条件下,许多大脑区域都与DD有关,但DD中跨脑系统的大规模功能协调功能障碍仍然知之甚少。使用AES-SDM,我们对基于种子的全脑功能连接(FC)研究进行了meta分析,包括12项基于任务的研究,涉及226名阅读障碍患者和232名年龄匹配的对照,以及7项静息状态研究,涉及120名阅读障碍患者和145名对照。结果显示,在任务和静息状态下,与年龄匹配的对照组相比,失读症患者的左侧额下回(IFG)和左侧梭状回(FFG)之间的FC持续减少,这表明DD背后存在核心神经通路。此外,我们还发现了任务特异性异常,包括左侧额下回与右侧小脑之间的低连接,以及左侧额下回与双侧角回(AG)、前扣带皮层(ACC)、左额下回与右小脑之间的高连接。左丘脑。相比之下,静息状态分析发现左侧FFG和后扣带皮层(PCC)之间存在额外的低连通性。总之,这些发现表明,DD与整个大脑功能整合的广泛破坏有关,为DD的神经机制提供了新的思路,并指出了基于连接的潜在诊断生物标志物。摘要:阅读障碍患者在任务和休息条件下均表现出左额下回和左梭状回之间的连接不足。在任务条件下,阅读障碍患者表现出左侧额下回与右侧小脑之间的特异性连通性低,而与双侧角回、前扣带皮层和左侧丘脑之间的特异性连通性高。在静息状态下,阅读障碍患者表现出左梭状回与后扣带皮层之间的特异性连通性低下。
{"title":"Functional Connectivity Alterations in Developmental Dyslexia: A Meta-Analysis of Task-Based and Resting-State fMRI Studies","authors":"Junzhe Wang,&nbsp;Yang Yang,&nbsp;Jinqiu Liu,&nbsp;Huan Ren,&nbsp;Hong-Yan Bi","doi":"10.1111/desc.70093","DOIUrl":"10.1111/desc.70093","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Developmental dyslexia (DD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder that significantly affects academic learning and social development. Although numerous brain regions have been implicated in DD under both task-based and resting-state conditions, dysfunctions in large-scale functional coordination across brain systems in DD remains poorly understood. Using AES-SDM, we conducted a meta-analysis of seed-based whole-brain functional connectivity (FC) studies, including 12 task-based studies with 226 dyslexics and 232 age-matched controls, and 7 resting-state studies with 120 dyslexics and 145 controls. Results revealed consistently reduced FC between the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and the left fusiform gyrus (FFG) in dyslexics compared with age-matched controls across both task and resting states, suggesting a core neural pathway underlying DD. In addition, task-specific abnormalities were identified, including hypoconnectivity between the left IFG and the right cerebellum, and hyperconnectivity between the left IFG and the bilateral angular gyrus (AG), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and left thalamus. By contrast, resting-state analyses identified additional hypoconnectivity between the left FFG and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). Together, these findings suggest that DD is associated with widespread disruption in functional integration across the brain, shedding new light on its neural mechanisms of DD and pointing to potential connectivity-based biomarkers for diagnosis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Summary</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Dyslexics exhibited consistent hypoconnectivity between the left inferior frontal gyrus and the left fusiform gyrus across both task and resting conditions.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Under the task condition, dyslexics showed specific hypoconnectivity between the left inferior frontal gyrus and the right cerebellum, and hyperconnectivity with the bilateral angular gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and left thalamus.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Under the resting condition, dyslexics showed specific hypoconnectivity between the left fusiform gyrus and the posterior cingulate cortex.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145507611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interrogating Early Word Knowledge: Factors That Influence the Alignment Between Caregiver-Report and Experimental Measures 询问早期单词知识:影响护理者报告与实验测量之间一致性的因素。
IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-11-11 DOI: 10.1111/desc.70088
Haley Weaver, Jenny R. Saffran

Questions about early word knowledge pervade the literature on both typical and atypical language trajectories. To determine which words an infant knows, researchers have relied on two types of measures—caregiver-report and eye-gaze behavior. When these measures are compared, however, their results frequently fail to converge, making it difficult to ascertain whether a given infant knows a given set of words. What are the reasons for these misalignments in gold-standard tasks that are designed to investigate the same underlying construct, and can convergent validity be improved? The current study was designed to investigate multiple methodological features of caregiver-report and looking-while-listening (LWL) tasks hypothesized to contribute to their alignment. American English-learning infants (18–20 months; N = 52) completed an LWL task assessing their understanding of eight early-acquired words. Caregivers reported their child's knowledge of the same eight words, as well as their confidence in their responses and the amount of time they spend with their child. Overall, caregivers’ reports of word knowledge did not predict infants’ eye-gaze behavior. However, the measures were more likely to be aligned when caregivers reported higher confidence in their responses. Caregivers’ reports about both the target and the distractor word on each trial were related to infants’ eye-gaze behavior, suggesting that LWL tasks capture knowledge about the labels of both objects tested, not just the label of the target object. The results suggest several critical methodological modifications that could be implemented to improve the measurement validity of both caregiver-report and eye-gaze measures of word comprehension.

Summary

  • This study provides novel insights to improve the validity of infant vocabulary measurement by highlighting factors that explain differences between caregivers' reports and eye-gaze behavior.
  • Caregivers’ reports of individual word knowledge failed to converge with infants’ eye-gaze behavior during a looking-while-listening (LWL) task.
  • Caregivers’ reports of individual word knowledge aligned more strongly with their infant's eye-gaze behavior when caregivers reported more confidence in their responses.
  • Caregivers’ reports of both the target and the distractor words predicted infants’ eye gaze behavior.
关于早期词汇知识的问题在典型和非典型语言轨迹的文献中普遍存在。为了确定婴儿知道哪些单词,研究人员依靠两种测量方法——看护者报告和眼睛注视行为。然而,当这些测量进行比较时,他们的结果往往不能收敛,这使得很难确定一个给定的婴儿是否知道一组给定的单词。在设计用于调查相同底层结构的金标准任务中,这些偏差的原因是什么?收敛有效性是否可以改进?当前的研究旨在调查照顾者报告和边看边听(LWL)任务的多种方法特征,假设有助于他们的一致性。美国英语学习婴儿(18-20个月;N = 52)完成了一项LWL任务,评估他们对8个早期习得单词的理解。照顾者报告了他们的孩子对这八个单词的认识,以及他们对自己的回答的信心和他们和孩子在一起的时间。总的来说,看护者对单词知识的报告并不能预测婴儿的注视行为。然而,当护理人员对他们的回答有更高的信心时,这些措施更有可能一致。在每个实验中,看护者对目标词和干扰词的报告都与婴儿的注视行为有关,这表明LWL任务捕获了关于被测试物体的标签的知识,而不仅仅是目标物体的标签。研究结果表明,可以实施几个关键的方法修改,以提高护理者报告和眼睛注视测量单词理解的有效性。摘要:本研究为提高婴儿词汇测量的有效性提供了新的见解,强调了解释照顾者报告和注视行为之间差异的因素。在看-听(LWL)任务中,照顾者对个体词汇知识的报告与婴儿的眼睛注视行为不一致。当看护者对自己的回答更有信心时,他们所报告的个人词汇知识与婴儿的注视行为更紧密地联系在一起。看护者对目标词和干扰词的报告都能预测婴儿的注视行为。
{"title":"Interrogating Early Word Knowledge: Factors That Influence the Alignment Between Caregiver-Report and Experimental Measures","authors":"Haley Weaver,&nbsp;Jenny R. Saffran","doi":"10.1111/desc.70088","DOIUrl":"10.1111/desc.70088","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Questions about early word knowledge pervade the literature on both typical and atypical language trajectories. To determine which words an infant knows, researchers have relied on two types of measures—caregiver-report and eye-gaze behavior. When these measures are compared, however, their results frequently fail to converge, making it difficult to ascertain whether a given infant knows a given set of words. What are the reasons for these misalignments in gold-standard tasks that are designed to investigate the same underlying construct, and can convergent validity be improved? The current study was designed to investigate multiple methodological features of caregiver-report and looking-while-listening (LWL) tasks hypothesized to contribute to their alignment. American English-learning infants (18–20 months; <i>N</i> = 52) completed an LWL task assessing their understanding of eight early-acquired words. Caregivers reported their child's knowledge of the same eight words, as well as their confidence in their responses and the amount of time they spend with their child. Overall, caregivers’ reports of word knowledge did not predict infants’ eye-gaze behavior. However, the measures were more likely to be aligned when caregivers reported higher confidence in their responses. Caregivers’ reports about both the target and the distractor word on each trial were related to infants’ eye-gaze behavior, suggesting that LWL tasks capture knowledge about the labels of both objects tested, not just the label of the target object. The results suggest several critical methodological modifications that could be implemented to improve the measurement validity of both caregiver-report and eye-gaze measures of word comprehension.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Summary</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>This study provides novel insights to improve the validity of infant vocabulary measurement by highlighting factors that explain differences between caregivers' reports and eye-gaze behavior.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Caregivers’ reports of individual word knowledge failed to converge with infants’ eye-gaze behavior during a looking-while-listening (LWL) task.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Caregivers’ reports of individual word knowledge aligned more strongly with their infant's eye-gaze behavior when caregivers reported more confidence in their responses.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Caregivers’ reports of both the target and the distractor words predicted infants’ eye gaze behavior.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.70088","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145490312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Videos and Vocabulary: How Digital Media Use Impacts the Types of Words Children Know 视频和词汇:数字媒体的使用如何影响孩子们认识的词汇类型。
IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-11-10 DOI: 10.1111/desc.70091
Sarah C. Kucker, Rachel F. Barr, Lynn K. Perry

The last decade has seen an exponential rise in children's digital media use, as well as growing evidence that it is associated with changes in children's vocabulary. However, while high rates of low-quality digital media have been associated with lower amounts of words a child says, little work has examined whether digital media alters the types of words a child knows. Here, we explore whether differences in the amount of digital media exposure are associated with differences in the composition of children's vocabulary. The current study surveyed 388 caregivers of children 17–30 months (M = 23.9 months) on their children's productive vocabulary and technology use. Multiple regression models predicted the proportion of words children knew in different semantic categories based on the time they spent watching videos/TV, controlling for total noun vocabulary size, age, and income. Increased video watching was associated with producing a smaller proportion of body part words and more people and furniture words, but not other semantic categories. Increased video watching was not associated with differences in shape- or material-based nouns. The results suggest that differences in children's video watching are associated with differences in overall vocabulary size, but also with the particular types of words children know. This may have implications for supporting children's future language in a technology-filled world.

Summary

  • Digital media exposure has been associated with changes in children's vocabularies. However, little work examines whether the media alters the types of words a child learns.
  • The current study explores whether differences in the amount of digital media exposure are associated with differences in the composition of children's vocabulary.
  • Increased video watching was associated with producing fewer body part words, more people, and more furniture words, but no difference in shape- or material-based nouns.
  • The results suggest that differences in children's video watching are associated with differences in overall vocabulary size, but also with the types of words children know.
过去十年,儿童使用数字媒体呈指数级增长,越来越多的证据表明,这与儿童词汇的变化有关。然而,尽管高比例的低质量数字媒体与孩子说的单词量减少有关,但很少有研究调查数字媒体是否会改变孩子认识的单词类型。在这里,我们探讨数字媒体曝光量的差异是否与儿童词汇构成的差异有关。本研究调查了388名17-30个月(M = 23.9个月)儿童的看护人,调查了他们孩子的生产性词汇和技术使用情况。多元回归模型根据儿童观看视频/电视的时间,控制名词总词汇量、年龄和收入,预测儿童在不同语义类别中所知道的单词比例。观看视频的时间越长,产生的身体部位词的比例越小,产生的人和家具词的比例越高,但其他语义类别的词则没有。视频观看时间的增加与基于形状或材料的名词的差异无关。研究结果表明,儿童观看视频的时间差异与总体词汇量的差异有关,但也与儿童所知道的特定类型的词汇有关。这可能对在一个充满技术的世界里支持孩子们未来的语言有影响。摘要:接触数字媒体与儿童词汇量的变化有关。然而,很少有人研究媒体是否会改变孩子学习的词汇类型。目前的研究探讨了数字媒体曝光量的差异是否与儿童词汇构成的差异有关。观看视频的时间越长,产生的身体部位词就越少,产生的人越多,产生的家具词就越多,而形状或材料相关的名词则没有什么不同。研究结果表明,儿童观看视频的时间差异与总体词汇量的差异有关,但也与儿童认识的词汇类型有关。
{"title":"Videos and Vocabulary: How Digital Media Use Impacts the Types of Words Children Know","authors":"Sarah C. Kucker,&nbsp;Rachel F. Barr,&nbsp;Lynn K. Perry","doi":"10.1111/desc.70091","DOIUrl":"10.1111/desc.70091","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The last decade has seen an exponential rise in children's digital media use, as well as growing evidence that it is associated with changes in children's vocabulary. However, while high rates of low-quality digital media have been associated with lower <i>amounts</i> of words a child says, little work has examined whether digital media alters <i>the types</i> of words a child knows. Here, we explore whether differences in the amount of digital media exposure are associated with differences in the composition of children's vocabulary. The current study surveyed 388 caregivers of children 17–30 months (<i>M</i> = 23.9 months) on their children's productive vocabulary and technology use. Multiple regression models predicted the proportion of words children knew in different semantic categories based on the time they spent watching videos/TV, controlling for total noun vocabulary size, age, and income. Increased video watching was associated with producing a smaller proportion of body part words and more people and furniture words, but not other semantic categories. Increased video watching was not associated with differences in shape- or material-based nouns. The results suggest that differences in children's video watching are associated with differences in overall vocabulary size, but also with the particular types of words children know. This may have implications for supporting children's future language in a technology-filled world.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Summary</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Digital media exposure has been associated with changes in children's vocabularies. However, little work examines whether the media alters the <i>types</i> of words a child learns.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The current study explores whether differences in the amount of digital media exposure are associated with differences in the composition of children's vocabulary.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Increased video watching was associated with producing fewer body part words, more people, and more furniture words, but no difference in shape- or material-based nouns.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The results suggest that differences in children's video watching are associated with differences in overall vocabulary size, but also with the types of words children know.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12602769/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145490314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diversity as the Fuel of Theory: Demographic Biases in CHILDES and Its Commentaries 多样性是理论的燃料:《柴尔德》及其评论中的人口统计学偏差。
IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-11-10 DOI: 10.1111/desc.70092
Camila Scaff, Georgia Loukatou, Alejandrina Cristia, Naomi Havron
<p>We are grateful to the authors of the six commentaries on our analysis of demographic biases in the CHILDES database. The commentaries unanimously celebrate CHILDES’ contributions, as do we. CHILDES is a remarkable resource, foundational for cross-linguistic and theoretical advances in child language research and still holding extraordinary untapped potential. MacWhinney and Snow (<span>2025</span>) and Christiansen and McCauley (<span>2025</span>) argue that CHILDES corpora, even if biased, have proven repeatedly to be theoretically important: either as “edge cases” for universal claims, or as proof-of-concept data. Christiansen and McCauley (<span>2025</span>) further propose a comparative approach in which computational models are tested with different grain sizes across languages and demographics to mitigate biases.</p><p>At the same time, the commentaries reaffirm our invitation to reflect on the effects of systematic demographic biases. Omane et al. (<span>2025</span>) highlight the near-total invisibility of Africa, despite its immense linguistic and cultural diversity, reminding us that “normal” is defined differently across contexts: In much of Africa, multilingualism and allomaternal care are the rule rather than the exception. Even as one of the most diverse resources available, CHILDES still predominantly represents English-speaking, urban, highly educated, nuclear, monolingual families.</p><p>Several commentators stress the importance of intersectionality with multilingualism as a clear example. As Omane et al. (<span>2025</span>), Gökşun and Aktan-Erciyes (<span>2025</span>), and Marchman and Weisleder (<span>2025</span>) note, CHILDES bilingual corpora overrepresent high SES, Western, urban centers, whereas most of the world's bilinguals do not grow up in such environments. They emphasize that diversity must be pursued across intersecting dimensions (SES, urbanization, family structure), rather than treated separately. A fundamental question then, as presented by Kidd and Garcia (<span>2025</span>), is whether demographic variables merely influence trajectories (e.g., vocabulary size, rate of growth) or whether they affect the <i>mechanisms</i> of acquisition themselves.</p><p>Moving forward, progress will require systematic metadata collection, a move away from convenience sampling (Kidd and Garcia <span>2025</span>), purposive sampling targeting underrepresented realities (Omane et al. <span>2025</span>), and denser recordings that capture a broader slice of daily life (Marchman and Weisleder <span>2025</span>). It will also require finding solutions to ethical challenges and the shortage of support and funding of institutional agencies, as well as developing heuristics for making the most informed decisions from the data that we can collect (Havron et al. <span>2022</span>; Hellwig et al. <span>2023</span>).</p><p>We can only thank Brian MacWhinney and Catherine Snow for their revolutionary initiative 40 years ago. As they no
我们感谢对我们对CHILDES数据库中人口统计偏差分析的六篇评论的作者。评论一致赞扬CHILDES的贡献,我们也一样。CHILDES是一个重要的资源,为儿童语言研究的跨语言和理论进展奠定了基础,并且仍然具有巨大的未开发潜力。MacWhinney和Snow(2025)以及Christiansen和McCauley(2025)认为,CHILDES语料库,即使有偏见,也被反复证明在理论上是重要的:要么作为普遍主张的“边缘案例”,要么作为概念验证数据。Christiansen和McCauley(2025)进一步提出了一种比较方法,在这种方法中,计算模型在不同语言和人口统计学的不同粒度下进行测试,以减轻偏见。与此同时,评论再次邀请我们反思系统性人口偏见的影响。Omane等人(2025)强调,尽管非洲有着巨大的语言和文化多样性,但非洲几乎完全被忽视,这提醒我们,在不同的背景下,“正常”的定义是不同的:在非洲的大部分地区,使用多种语言和异母护理是普遍现象,而不是例外。即使是最多样化的可用资源之一,CHILDES仍然主要代表说英语的城市、受过高等教育的核心、单语家庭。一些评论家强调交叉性的重要性,多语使用就是一个明显的例子。正如Omane等人(2025)、Gökşun和aktanerciyes(2025)以及Marchman和Weisleder(2025)所指出的,CHILDES双语语料库过多地代表了高SES、西方、城市中心,而世界上大多数双语者并不是在这样的环境中长大的。他们强调必须在相互交叉的方面(社会经济地位、城市化、家庭结构)追求多样性,而不是单独对待。基德和加西亚(Kidd and Garcia, 2025)提出的一个基本问题是,人口变量是否仅仅影响轨迹(如词汇量、增长速度),还是影响习得机制本身。展望未来,进步将需要系统的元数据收集,远离方便的抽样(Kidd和Garcia 2025),有目的的抽样针对代表性不足的现实(Omane等人2025),以及捕捉更广泛日常生活片段的密集记录(Marchman和Weisleder 2025)。它还需要找到解决伦理挑战和机构机构支持和资金短缺的解决方案,以及开发启发式方法,以便从我们可以收集的数据中做出最明智的决策(Havron et al. 2022; Hellwig et al. 2023)。我们只能感谢Brian MacWhinney和Catherine Snow在40年前提出的革命性倡议。正如他们在评论中指出的那样,看到取得如此大的进展令人振奋。记录和拥抱人类的多样性是一项需要重新承诺的任务。在科学领域的多样性倡议面临削减,边缘化群体的研究机会正在减少的时候,记住多样性不是对理论的威胁,而是它的燃料,这一点至关重要:因此,语言习得理论必须将人口变化不仅视为语境修饰,而且视为机制层面变化的潜在驱动因素。变异说明了使语言学习成为人类普遍成就的共同过程。作者声明无利益冲突。数据共享不适用于本文,因为在当前研究中没有生成或分析数据集。
{"title":"Diversity as the Fuel of Theory: Demographic Biases in CHILDES and Its Commentaries","authors":"Camila Scaff,&nbsp;Georgia Loukatou,&nbsp;Alejandrina Cristia,&nbsp;Naomi Havron","doi":"10.1111/desc.70092","DOIUrl":"10.1111/desc.70092","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;We are grateful to the authors of the six commentaries on our analysis of demographic biases in the CHILDES database. The commentaries unanimously celebrate CHILDES’ contributions, as do we. CHILDES is a remarkable resource, foundational for cross-linguistic and theoretical advances in child language research and still holding extraordinary untapped potential. MacWhinney and Snow (&lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) and Christiansen and McCauley (&lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) argue that CHILDES corpora, even if biased, have proven repeatedly to be theoretically important: either as “edge cases” for universal claims, or as proof-of-concept data. Christiansen and McCauley (&lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) further propose a comparative approach in which computational models are tested with different grain sizes across languages and demographics to mitigate biases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At the same time, the commentaries reaffirm our invitation to reflect on the effects of systematic demographic biases. Omane et al. (&lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) highlight the near-total invisibility of Africa, despite its immense linguistic and cultural diversity, reminding us that “normal” is defined differently across contexts: In much of Africa, multilingualism and allomaternal care are the rule rather than the exception. Even as one of the most diverse resources available, CHILDES still predominantly represents English-speaking, urban, highly educated, nuclear, monolingual families.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Several commentators stress the importance of intersectionality with multilingualism as a clear example. As Omane et al. (&lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;), Gökşun and Aktan-Erciyes (&lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;), and Marchman and Weisleder (&lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;) note, CHILDES bilingual corpora overrepresent high SES, Western, urban centers, whereas most of the world's bilinguals do not grow up in such environments. They emphasize that diversity must be pursued across intersecting dimensions (SES, urbanization, family structure), rather than treated separately. A fundamental question then, as presented by Kidd and Garcia (&lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;), is whether demographic variables merely influence trajectories (e.g., vocabulary size, rate of growth) or whether they affect the &lt;i&gt;mechanisms&lt;/i&gt; of acquisition themselves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Moving forward, progress will require systematic metadata collection, a move away from convenience sampling (Kidd and Garcia &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;), purposive sampling targeting underrepresented realities (Omane et al. &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;), and denser recordings that capture a broader slice of daily life (Marchman and Weisleder &lt;span&gt;2025&lt;/span&gt;). It will also require finding solutions to ethical challenges and the shortage of support and funding of institutional agencies, as well as developing heuristics for making the most informed decisions from the data that we can collect (Havron et al. &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;/span&gt;; Hellwig et al. &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We can only thank Brian MacWhinney and Catherine Snow for their revolutionary initiative 40 years ago. As they no","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12602765/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145490302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Developmental Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1