首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Accounting Research最新文献

英文 中文
Disclosure, Patenting, and Trade Secrecy 信息披露、专利申请和商业秘密
IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12580
ARNOUD BOOT, VLADIMIR VLADIMIROV

Patent applications often reveal proprietary information to competitors, but does such disclosure harm firms or also benefit them? We develop and empirically support a theory showing that when firms patent enhancements to incumbent, nondisruptive technologies, they can cooperate more easily on these technologies, increasing their profitability. The downside of cooperating on nondisruptive technologies is that the investment in and commitment to disruptive technologies decline. To improve their commitment to disruptive technologies, some firms rely more on trade secrecy. We provide empirical support for these predictions. We document that after a patent reform that made information about patent applications widely accessible, firms cooperate more and charge higher markups. Furthermore, the nature of patented innovation has changed, with the proportion of nondisruptive patents increasing substantially. Finally, while some firms start patenting more, others patent less and rely more on trade secrecy, with the response depending on the attractiveness of firms' innovation prospects.

专利申请通常会向竞争对手披露专有信息,但这种披露会损害企业还是会使企业受益?我们提出并通过实证支持的理论表明,当企业为现有的非破坏性技术的改进申请专利时,它们可以更容易地在这些技术上进行合作,从而提高利润率。在非破坏性技术上合作的弊端在于,企业对破坏性技术的投资和投入会减少。为了提高对颠覆性技术的投入,一些企业更加依赖于商业机密。我们为这些预测提供了经验支持。根据我们的记录,在专利改革后,专利申请信息可被广泛获取,企业之间的合作更多,加价也更高。此外,专利创新的性质也发生了变化,非破坏性专利的比例大幅增加。最后,在一些企业开始更多申请专利的同时,另一些企业则减少了专利申请,并更多地依赖于商业机密,其反应取决于企业创新前景的吸引力。
{"title":"Disclosure, Patenting, and Trade Secrecy","authors":"ARNOUD BOOT,&nbsp;VLADIMIR VLADIMIROV","doi":"10.1111/1475-679X.12580","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-679X.12580","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Patent applications often reveal proprietary information to competitors, but does such disclosure harm firms or also benefit them? We develop and empirically support a theory showing that when firms patent enhancements to incumbent, nondisruptive technologies, they can cooperate more easily on these technologies, increasing their profitability. The downside of cooperating on nondisruptive technologies is that the investment in and commitment to disruptive technologies decline. To improve their commitment to disruptive technologies, some firms rely more on trade secrecy. We provide empirical support for these predictions. We document that after a patent reform that made information about patent applications widely accessible, firms cooperate more and charge higher markups. Furthermore, the nature of patented innovation has changed, with the proportion of nondisruptive patents increasing substantially. Finally, while some firms start patenting more, others patent less and rely more on trade secrecy, with the response depending on the attractiveness of firms' innovation prospects.</p>","PeriodicalId":48414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"63 1","pages":"5-56"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-679X.12580","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142486522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of Information in Building a More Sustainable Economy: A Supply and Demand Perspective 信息在建设更可持续的经济中的作用:供需视角
IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12581
HENRY L. FRIEDMAN, GAIZKA ORMAZABAL

Interest in sustainability information, from investors, managers, researchers, and others, has been expanding rapidly. We discuss recent advances and open questions related to sustainability reporting and disclosure through the lens of a supply and demand framework. Our discussion builds on prior research on financial reporting and highlights unique aspects of the provision of sustainability information.

投资者、管理者、研究人员等对可持续发展信息的兴趣一直在迅速增长。我们通过供需框架的视角,讨论与可持续发展报告和披露相关的最新进展和悬而未决的问题。我们的讨论建立在之前对财务报告的研究基础之上,并强调了提供可持续发展信息的独特方面。
{"title":"The Role of Information in Building a More Sustainable Economy: A Supply and Demand Perspective","authors":"HENRY L. FRIEDMAN,&nbsp;GAIZKA ORMAZABAL","doi":"10.1111/1475-679X.12581","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-679X.12581","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Interest in sustainability information, from investors, managers, researchers, and others, has been expanding rapidly. We discuss recent advances and open questions related to sustainability reporting and disclosure through the lens of a supply and demand framework. Our discussion builds on prior research on financial reporting and highlights unique aspects of the provision of sustainability information.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"62 5","pages":"1575-1609"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142448563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comply or Explain: Do Firms Opportunistically Claim Trade Secrets in Mandatory Environmental Disclosure Programs? 遵守还是解释?企业在强制性环境信息披露计划中是否伺机索取商业秘密?
IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12583
YILE (ANSON) JIANG

This paper studies whether firms opportunistically make proprietary claims in mandatory environmental disclosure programs with trade secret exemption rules. Examining the mandatory chemical disclosure program in the fracking industry, I find evidence of opportunistic withholding of information among operators that are less likely to have trade secrets. Specifically, I find that these operators claim fewer chemicals as trade secrets when the operating site is in close proximity to water quality monitors. This is only observed among publicly traded operators that face a higher cost of societal backlash when disclosing pollutant information. Further analyses suggest that these operators are concerned about external environmental monitoring, which deters them from opportunistic information withholding. Regarding public and private operators that are more likely to have trade secrets, I do not find strong evidence that their information withholding varies with the monitoring conditions.

本文研究了在有商业秘密豁免规则的强制性环境信息披露项目中,企业是否会伺机提出专有权主张。通过研究压裂行业的强制性化学品披露计划,我发现有证据表明,不太可能拥有商业秘密的经营者会伺机隐瞒信息。具体来说,我发现当作业地点靠近水质监测站时,这些经营者将较少的化学品列为商业机密。这种情况只出现在公开上市的运营商中,因为他们在披露污染物信息时面临的社会反弹成本较高。进一步的分析表明,这些经营者对外部环境监测存在顾虑,这使他们不敢投机取巧地隐瞒信息。至于更有可能拥有商业秘密的公共和私营运营商,我没有发现有力的证据表明他们的信息隐瞒会随着监测条件的变化而变化。
{"title":"Comply or Explain: Do Firms Opportunistically Claim Trade Secrets in Mandatory Environmental Disclosure Programs?","authors":"YILE (ANSON) JIANG","doi":"10.1111/1475-679X.12583","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-679X.12583","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper studies whether firms opportunistically make proprietary claims in mandatory environmental disclosure programs with trade secret exemption rules. Examining the mandatory chemical disclosure program in the fracking industry, I find evidence of opportunistic withholding of information among operators that are less likely to have trade secrets. Specifically, I find that these operators claim fewer chemicals as trade secrets when the operating site is in close proximity to water quality monitors. This is only observed among publicly traded operators that face a higher cost of societal backlash when disclosing pollutant information. Further analyses suggest that these operators are concerned about external environmental monitoring, which deters them from opportunistic information withholding. Regarding public and private operators that are more likely to have trade secrets, I do not find strong evidence that their information withholding varies with the monitoring conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"62 5","pages":"1755-1794"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-679X.12583","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142440356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring the Prevalence of Earnings Manipulations: A Novel Approach 衡量收益操纵的普遍性:一种新方法
IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12578
NICOLE L. CADE, JOSHUA L. GUNN, ALEX J. VANDENBERG

We provide prevalence estimates for five forms of earnings manipulation based on executives’ reports about their firms’ actual reporting practices. After preregistering our methods and analyses via the Journal of Accounting Research’s registration-based editorial process, we recruit nearly a thousand executives from firms listed in the Russell 3000 Index to participate in either a survey or a list experiment; the hallmark of the latter being additional privacy protections designed to promote honest disclosure about self-incriminating information. In our survey, 26.8% of executives disclose at least one form of earnings manipulation at their firm in the 2018–2023 period: 18.0% report changing an operational activity to meet a near-term earnings target at the expense of long-term value (i.e., real earnings management), 8.8% report intentionally obfuscating unfavorable information, 6.6% report manipulating accruals, 3.9% report withholding material information, and 0.0% report accounting fraud. Our list experiment produces an economically higher result in two cases, estimating that 29.9% of firms engaged in real earnings management and 12.4% committed accounting fraud over the same time period. We conclude that while a traditional survey can provide credible lower-bound estimates for the prevalence of many forms of earnings manipulation, list experiments encourage more honest disclosure in some cases.

我们根据高管对其公司实际报告做法的报告,对五种形式的盈利操纵行为进行了普遍性估计。在通过《会计研究期刊》基于注册的编辑流程预先注册我们的方法和分析后,我们招募了近千名来自罗素 3000 指数上市公司的高管参与调查或名单实验;后者的特点是额外的隐私保护,旨在促进诚实披露自证其罪的信息。在我们的调查中,26.8% 的高管披露了其公司在 2018-2023 年期间至少有一种形式的盈利操纵行为:18.0%的高管报告说,他们改变了一项运营活动,以牺牲长期价值来实现近期盈利目标(即真正的盈利管理);8.8%的高管报告说,他们有意混淆不利信息;6.6%的高管报告说,他们操纵了应计项目;3.9%的高管报告说,他们隐瞒了重要信息;0.0%的高管报告说,他们进行了会计欺诈。我们的列表实验在两种情况下得出了经济上更高的结果,估计同期有 29.9% 的公司进行了真实的收益管理,12.4% 的公司进行了会计欺诈。我们的结论是,虽然传统调查可以为多种形式的盈利操纵行为的普遍性提供可信的下限估计,但名单实验在某些情况下会鼓励更诚实的披露。
{"title":"Measuring the Prevalence of Earnings Manipulations: A Novel Approach","authors":"NICOLE L. CADE,&nbsp;JOSHUA L. GUNN,&nbsp;ALEX J. VANDENBERG","doi":"10.1111/1475-679X.12578","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-679X.12578","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We provide prevalence estimates for five forms of earnings manipulation based on executives’ reports about their firms’ actual reporting practices. After preregistering our methods and analyses via the <i>Journal of Accounting Research</i>’s registration-based editorial process, we recruit nearly a thousand executives from firms listed in the Russell 3000 Index to participate in either a survey or a list experiment; the hallmark of the latter being additional privacy protections designed to promote honest disclosure about self-incriminating information. In our survey, 26.8% of executives disclose at least one form of earnings manipulation at their firm in the 2018–2023 period: 18.0% report changing an operational activity to meet a near-term earnings target at the expense of long-term value (i.e., real earnings management), 8.8% report intentionally obfuscating unfavorable information, 6.6% report manipulating accruals, 3.9% report withholding material information, and 0.0% report accounting fraud. Our list experiment produces an economically higher result in two cases, estimating that 29.9% of firms engaged in real earnings management and 12.4% committed accounting fraud over the same time period. We conclude that while a traditional survey can provide credible lower-bound estimates for the prevalence of many forms of earnings manipulation, list experiments encourage more honest disclosure in some cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":48414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"63 1","pages":"113-164"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-679X.12578","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142386277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Discontinuous Distribution of Test Statistics Around Significance Thresholds in Empirical Accounting Studies 实证会计研究中检验统计量在显著性阈值附近的不连续分布
IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12579
XIN CHANG, HUASHENG GAO, WEI LI

Examining test statistics from articles in six leading accounting journals, we detect discontinuities in their distributions around conventional significance thresholds (p-values of 0.05 and 0.01) and find an unusual abundance of test statistics that are just significant. Further analysis reveals that these discontinuities are more prominent in studies with smaller samples and are more salient in experimental than in archival studies. The discontinuity discrepancy between experimental and archival studies relates to several proxies for researcher degrees of freedom. Nevertheless, this evidence does not imply that experimental research is more prone to questionable research practices than archival studies. Overall, our findings speak to the concern of whether accounting researchers could exercise undisclosed discretion to obtain and report statistically significant results. Based on our results, a healthy skepticism of some just-significant test statistics is warranted.

通过对六种主要会计期刊论文中的检验统计量进行研究,我们发现这些统计量的分布在常规显著性临界值(p 值为 0.05 和 0.01)附近存在不连续性,并发现大量检验统计量具有非同寻常的显著性。进一步的分析表明,这些不连续性在样本较小的研究中更为突出,在实验研究中比在档案研究中更为明显。实验研究与档案研究之间的不连续性差异与研究者自由度的几个代理变量有关。尽管如此,这些证据并不意味着实验研究比档案研究更容易出现有问题的研究实践。总体而言,我们的研究结果说明了人们对会计研究人员是否可以行使未公开的自由裁量权来获取和报告具有统计意义的结果的担忧。基于我们的研究结果,我们有理由对一些刚刚具有显著性的测试统计结果持健康的怀疑态度。
{"title":"Discontinuous Distribution of Test Statistics Around Significance Thresholds in Empirical Accounting Studies","authors":"XIN CHANG,&nbsp;HUASHENG GAO,&nbsp;WEI LI","doi":"10.1111/1475-679X.12579","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-679X.12579","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Examining test statistics from articles in six leading accounting journals, we detect discontinuities in their distributions around conventional significance thresholds (<i>p-</i>values of 0.05 and 0.01) and find an unusual abundance of test statistics that are just significant. Further analysis reveals that these discontinuities are more prominent in studies with smaller samples and are more salient in experimental than in archival studies. The discontinuity discrepancy between experimental and archival studies relates to several proxies for researcher degrees of freedom. Nevertheless, this evidence does not imply that experimental research is more prone to questionable research practices than archival studies. Overall, our findings speak to the concern of whether accounting researchers could exercise undisclosed discretion to obtain and report statistically significant results. Based on our results, a healthy skepticism of some just-significant test statistics is warranted.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"63 1","pages":"165-206"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142384049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Court Disclosures of Firms in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy 法院对处于破产保护程序中的公司的披露*
IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12576
Ilona Bastiaansen, Alina Lerman, Frank Murphy, Dushyant Vyas

Stakeholders in the Chapter 11 reorganization process face significant information uncertainty about the post-emergence prospects of the firm. The U.S. Bankruptcy Code requires a debtor to provide a disclosure statement containing “adequate information” about its financial status and a proposed reorganization plan but stops short of rigidly defining the adequacy standard. We document the heterogeneity in disclosure statement information across 16 distinct attributes and examine the variation in disclosures along several dimensions that reflect agency costs and coordination problems. We observe that Chapter 11 disclosure correlates more with claimant- and case-specific characteristics than pre-bankruptcy debtor characteristics. Our results illustrate the importance of institutional features in specific disclosure settings such as bankruptcy court filings. The research questions and methods of this study were registered via the Journal of Accounting Research’s registration-based editorial process.

在破产保护重组过程中,利益相关者在公司破产后的前景方面面临着巨大的信息不确定性。美国破产法》要求债务人提供一份包含有关其财务状况和拟议重组计划的 "充分信息 "的披露声明,但并未对充分性标准做出严格定义。我们记录了 16 个不同属性的披露声明信息的异质性,并从几个反映代理成本和协调问题的维度考察了披露信息的差异。我们发现,与破产前债务人的特征相比,第 11 章信息披露与索赔人和具体案件特征的相关性更大。我们的研究结果说明了机构特征在破产法院申请等特定披露环境中的重要性。本研究的研究问题和方法是通过《会计研究期刊》的注册编辑程序注册的。
{"title":"Court Disclosures of Firms in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy","authors":"Ilona Bastiaansen,&nbsp;Alina Lerman,&nbsp;Frank Murphy,&nbsp;Dushyant Vyas","doi":"10.1111/1475-679X.12576","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-679X.12576","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Stakeholders in the Chapter 11 reorganization process face significant information uncertainty about the post-emergence prospects of the firm. The U.S. Bankruptcy Code requires a debtor to provide a disclosure statement containing “adequate information” about its financial status and a proposed reorganization plan but stops short of rigidly defining the adequacy standard. We document the heterogeneity in disclosure statement information across 16 distinct attributes and examine the variation in disclosures along several dimensions that reflect agency costs and coordination problems. We observe that Chapter 11 disclosure correlates more with claimant- and case-specific characteristics than pre-bankruptcy debtor characteristics. Our results illustrate the importance of institutional features in specific disclosure settings such as bankruptcy court filings. The research questions and methods of this study were registered via the <i>Journal of Accounting Research</i>’s registration-based editorial process.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"63 1","pages":"57-112"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142317616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tax Policy Expectations and Investment 税收政策预期与投资
IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12577
John Gallemore, Stephan Hollander, Martin Jacob, Xiang Zheng

This paper examines how firms’ tax policy expectations (TPE) evolve around and relate to their investment responses to changes in tax policy. Using a text-based approach to measuring TPE, we find that two recent tax policy–changing events—namely, the 2016 U.S. presidential election and the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA)—spawned considerable between- and within-firm variation in TPE, with aggregate time-series patterns in TPE occasionally challenging prevailing assumptions in previous research. Further, we observe that event-induced TPE relate to investment both before and in response to the TCJA's passage in 2017, with offsetting associations between its first and second moments, and that these TPE moderate the TCJA's intended investment-stimulating effect. Furthermore, we document a difference between domestic and multinational firms in their TPE-investment response, with the former (latter) more likely to adjust the level (shift the country location) of their investment. Overall, our findings support the idea that TPE can impact investment behavior in the face of a tax policy change and suggest that our methodology can be used by future research to incorporate TPE into analyses of tax policy effects.

本文研究了企业的税收政策预期(TPE)如何围绕税收政策的变化而变化,以及与企业对税收政策变化的投资反应之间的关系。利用基于文本的方法来衡量 TPE,我们发现最近两个改变税收政策的事件--即 2016 年美国总统大选和《减税与就业法案》(TCJA)的颁布--在 TPE 方面产生了相当大的企业间和企业内差异,TPE 的总体时间序列模式偶尔会挑战以往研究中的普遍假设。此外,我们观察到,在 2017 年 TCJA 法案通过之前和通过之后,由事件引发的 TPE 与投资相关,在其第一和第二时刻之间存在相互抵消的关联,这些 TPE 缓和了 TCJA 预期的投资刺激效应。此外,我们还记录了国内企业和跨国企业在TPE-投资反应方面的差异,前者(后者)更有可能调整投资水平(转移国家位置)。总之,我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即面对税收政策变化,TPE 会影响投资行为,并表明我们的方法可用于未来的研究,将 TPE 纳入税收政策效应分析中。
{"title":"Tax Policy Expectations and Investment","authors":"John Gallemore,&nbsp;Stephan Hollander,&nbsp;Martin Jacob,&nbsp;Xiang Zheng","doi":"10.1111/1475-679X.12577","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-679X.12577","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This paper examines how firms’ tax policy expectations (TPE) evolve around and relate to their investment responses to changes in tax policy. Using a text-based approach to measuring TPE, we find that two recent tax policy–changing events—namely, the 2016 U.S. presidential election and the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA)—spawned considerable between- and within-firm variation in TPE, with aggregate time-series patterns in TPE occasionally challenging prevailing assumptions in previous research. Further, we observe that event-induced TPE relate to investment both before and in response to the TCJA's passage in 2017, with offsetting associations between its first and second moments, and that these TPE moderate the TCJA's intended investment-stimulating effect. Furthermore, we document a difference between domestic and multinational firms in their TPE-investment response, with the former (latter) more likely to adjust the level (shift the country location) of their investment. Overall, our findings support the idea that TPE can impact investment behavior in the face of a tax policy change and suggest that our methodology can be used by future research to incorporate TPE into analyses of tax policy effects.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"63 1","pages":"363-412"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142317570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Internalizing Peer Firm Product Market Concerns: Supply Chain Relations and M&A Activity 同行企业产品市场担忧的内部化:供应链关系与并购活动
IF 4.4 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.1111/1475-679x.12574
FARZANA AFRIN, JINHWAN KIM, SUGATA ROYCHOWDHURY, BENJAMIN P. YOST
We explore whether firms internalize the product market concerns of their economically linked peers by examining merger and acquisition decisions in the context of customer–supplier relations. Given the extensive transfer of capital, knowledge, and information between merging parties, we hypothesize that customers’ competition concerns discourage their suppliers from engaging in vertically conflicted transactions (i.e., acquisitions of their customers’ rivals or suppliers to those rivals). Consistent with our hypothesis, we find that suppliers are less likely to engage in such transactions when their customers are subject to higher product market competition. Moreover, the effect is more pronounced when suppliers and customers have greater relationship-specific investments and when customers face heightened proprietary information concerns. Using plausibly exogenous variation in common ownership between customers and their rivals as a shock to customers’ competition concerns, we conclude that the link between customers’ competition concerns and supplier acquisitions is likely causal. Our findings suggest that firms alter their investment and strategic decisions in response to the product market competition concerns of their economically related peers.
我们通过研究客户与供应商关系背景下的并购决策,来探讨企业是否将经济上有关联的同行对产品市场的担忧内部化。鉴于并购双方之间存在广泛的资本、知识和信息转移,我们假设客户对竞争的担忧会阻止其供应商参与纵向冲突交易(即收购客户的竞争对手或这些竞争对手的供应商)。与我们的假设相一致,我们发现,当供应商的客户面临更激烈的产品市场竞争时,供应商参与此类交易的可能性较低。此外,当供应商和客户拥有更多的特定关系投资以及当客户面临更多的专有信息担忧时,这种影响会更加明显。利用客户与其竞争对手之间共同所有权的合理外生变化作为对客户竞争担忧的冲击,我们得出结论,客户的竞争担忧与供应商收购之间可能存在因果关系。我们的研究结果表明,企业会因经济上相关的同行对产品市场竞争的担忧而改变其投资和战略决策。
{"title":"Internalizing Peer Firm Product Market Concerns: Supply Chain Relations and M&A Activity","authors":"FARZANA AFRIN, JINHWAN KIM, SUGATA ROYCHOWDHURY, BENJAMIN P. YOST","doi":"10.1111/1475-679x.12574","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12574","url":null,"abstract":"We explore whether firms internalize the product market concerns of their economically linked peers by examining merger and acquisition decisions in the context of customer–supplier relations. Given the extensive transfer of capital, knowledge, and information between merging parties, we hypothesize that customers’ competition concerns discourage their suppliers from engaging in vertically conflicted transactions (i.e., acquisitions of their customers’ rivals or suppliers to those rivals). Consistent with our hypothesis, we find that suppliers are less likely to engage in such transactions when their customers are subject to higher product market competition. Moreover, the effect is more pronounced when suppliers and customers have greater relationship-specific investments and when customers face heightened proprietary information concerns. Using plausibly exogenous variation in common ownership between customers and their rivals as a shock to customers’ competition concerns, we conclude that the link between customers’ competition concerns and supplier acquisitions is likely causal. Our findings suggest that firms alter their investment and strategic decisions in response to the product market competition concerns of their economically related peers.","PeriodicalId":48414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142236959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global Evolution of Environmental and Social Disclosure in Annual Reports 年度报告中环境和社会信息披露的全球演变*
IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12575
Yan Lin, Rui Shen, Jasmine Wang, Y. Julia Yu

We study environmental and social (E&S) disclosures in annual reports. Using the word embedding model to examine over 210,000 annual reports from 24,271 public firms in 30 international countries/regions between 2001 and 2020, we create an E&S dictionary that allows us to document trends in annual report E&S disclosure. Specifically, we find: (1) increases in length and boilerplate language and (2) decreases in specificity. Our results also suggest that E&S disclosure quality improves after the adoption of voluntary ESG reporting frameworks but deteriorates after disclosure mandates. Our findings provide systematic evidence on the evolution of E&S disclosure in annual reports over the past two decades and shed light on how voluntary and mandatory standards have shaped global E&S reporting practices.

我们研究了年度报告中的环境和社会(E&S)信息披露。我们使用单词嵌入模型研究了 2001 年至 2020 年间 30 个国际国家/地区 24 271 家上市公司的 210 000 多份年度报告,创建了一个 E&S 词典,使我们能够记录年度报告中 E&S 披露的趋势。具体来说,我们发现(1)篇幅和模板语言增加;(2)具体内容减少。我们的结果还表明,在采用自愿性 ESG 报告框架后,E&S 披露质量有所提高,但在强制披露后则有所下降。我们的研究结果为过去二十年中年度报告中环境和社会责任披露的演变提供了系统性证据,并阐明了自愿性和强制性标准是如何塑造全球环境和社会责任报告实践的。
{"title":"Global Evolution of Environmental and Social Disclosure in Annual Reports","authors":"Yan Lin,&nbsp;Rui Shen,&nbsp;Jasmine Wang,&nbsp;Y. Julia Yu","doi":"10.1111/1475-679X.12575","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-679X.12575","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We study environmental and social (E&amp;S) disclosures in annual reports. Using the word embedding model to examine over 210,000 annual reports from 24,271 public firms in 30 international countries/regions between 2001 and 2020, we create an E&amp;S dictionary that allows us to document trends in annual report E&amp;S disclosure. Specifically, we find: (1) increases in length and boilerplate language and (2) decreases in specificity. Our results also suggest that E&amp;S disclosure quality improves after the adoption of voluntary ESG reporting frameworks but deteriorates after disclosure mandates. Our findings provide systematic evidence on the evolution of E&amp;S disclosure in annual reports over the past two decades and shed light on how voluntary and mandatory standards have shaped global E&amp;S reporting practices.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"62 5","pages":"1941-1988"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142198029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sexism, Culture, and Firm Value: Evidence from the Harvey Weinstein Scandal and the #MeToo Movement 性别歧视、文化和公司价值:来自哈维-韦恩斯坦丑闻和 #MeToo 运动的证据
IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12573
KARL V. LINS, LUKAS ROTH, HENRI SERVAES, ANE TAMAYO

During the revelation of the Harvey Weinstein scandal and the reemergence of the #MeToo movement, firms with a nonsexist corporate culture, proxied by having women among the five highest-paid executives, earn excess returns of 1.3% relative to firms without female top executives. These returns are driven by changes in investor preferences toward firms with a nonsexist culture. Institutional ownership increases in firms with a nonsexist culture after the Weinstein/#MeToo events, particularly for investors with larger holdings and investors with a lower ESG focus ex ante. Firms without female top executives improve gender diversity after these events, particularly in more sexist states and in industries with few women executives. Our evidence attests to the value of having a nonsexist corporate culture and indicates that changes in societal norms toward women are permeating into capital markets and corporations.

在哈维-温斯坦(Harvey Weinstein)丑闻曝光和 #MeToo 运动再次兴起期间,拥有非性别歧视企业文化的公司(以五位薪酬最高的高管中有女性为代表),相对于没有女性高管的公司,获得了 1.3% 的超额回报。这些回报是由投资者对具有非性别歧视企业文化的偏好变化所驱动的。韦恩斯坦/#MeToo 事件发生后,拥有非性别歧视文化的公司的机构所有权增加,尤其是对于持股规模较大的投资者和事前对环境、社会和公司治理关注度较低的投资者而言。在这些事件发生后,没有女性高管的公司提高了性别多样性,尤其是在性别歧视较严重的国家和女性高管较少的行业。我们的证据证明了拥有非性别歧视企业文化的价值,并表明社会对女性规范的改变正在渗透到资本市场和企业中。
{"title":"Sexism, Culture, and Firm Value: Evidence from the Harvey Weinstein Scandal and the #MeToo Movement","authors":"KARL V. LINS,&nbsp;LUKAS ROTH,&nbsp;HENRI SERVAES,&nbsp;ANE TAMAYO","doi":"10.1111/1475-679X.12573","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1475-679X.12573","url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the revelation of the Harvey Weinstein scandal and the reemergence of the #MeToo movement, firms with a nonsexist corporate culture, proxied by having women among the five highest-paid executives, earn excess returns of 1.3% relative to firms without female top executives. These returns are driven by changes in investor preferences toward firms with a nonsexist culture. Institutional ownership increases in firms with a nonsexist culture after the Weinstein/#MeToo events, particularly for investors with larger holdings and investors with a lower ESG focus ex ante. Firms without female top executives improve gender diversity after these events, particularly in more sexist states and in industries with few women executives. Our evidence attests to the value of having a nonsexist corporate culture and indicates that changes in societal norms toward women are permeating into capital markets and corporations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"62 5","pages":"1989-2035"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-679X.12573","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142130639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Accounting Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1