Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation最新文献

Introduction: Aortic stenosis is a cause of mortality or morbidity. It complicates the selection and management of anesthetic procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, hemodynamic effects and postoperative outcome of unilateral spinal anesthesia in geriatric patients with hip fractures with moderate or severe aortic stenosis.

Material and method: A retrospective observational study was conducted on geriatric high-risk patients with cardiac conditions who underwent surgery for hip fractures under unilateral spinal anesthesia with low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine. The study period spanned from January 2018 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria were individuals with moderate to severe aortic stenosis, as defined by the American Heart Association Criteria. Data on demographic information, cardiac pathologies, hemodynamic data, data on motor and sensory block, perioperative complications, and mortality rates at 30th and 180th days were collected.

Results: Mortality rates at the 30th day and 180th day were 8.9% (n:4) and 24.4% (n:11), respectively. T6 level was predominantly obtained level of anesthesia (44.4%). Motor and sensory block formation times averaged 7.6 and 4.8 minutes, respectively. Surgical procedures were performed mostly within 1 hour (66.7%), and complications were rare (11.1% hypotension). Initial analgesic effect showed a rapid resolution, with 64.4% of patients requiring analgesic within the first hour postoperatively.

Conclusion: In elderly patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis scheduled for hip fracture surgery, we posit that unilateral spinal anesthesia with ultra-low dose is safe and effective option.

Introduction: Non-attendance with scheduled postoperative follow-up visits remains a common issue in orthopaedic clinical research. The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with loss to follow-up among elderly patients with hip-fracture postoperatively.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1-year post-surgery was performed on patients aged over 60 years who underwent hip-fracture surgery from January 2017 to March 2019. Based on their completion of the appointed follow-up schedule, the patients were classified into 2 groups: the Loss to Follow-up (LTFU) Group and the Follow-up (FU) Group. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Functional Recovery Score (FRS) questionnaires. Telephone interviews were conducted with patients lost to follow-up to determine the reasons for non-attendance. A comparative analysis of baseline characteristics between the 2 groups was implemented, with further exploration of statistical differences through logistic regression.

Results: A total of 992 patients met the inclusion criteria were included in this study, of which 189 patients, accounting for 19.1%, were lost to follow-up 1 year postoperatively. The mean age of the patients in the LTFU Group was 82.0 years, significantly higher than the 76.0 years observed in the FU Group (P < 0.001). The FRS for the LTFU Group was marginally higher than that of the FU group (84.0 vs 81.0), with no significant difference (P = 0.060). Logistic regression analysis identified several significant predictors of noncompliance, including advanced age at surgery, femoral neck fracture, hip arthroplasty, long distance from residence to hospital, and the reliance on urban-rural public transportation for reaching the hospital.

Conclusion: Postoperative follow-up loss was prevalent among elderly patients with hip fractures. Our study indicated a constellation of risk factors contributing to noncompliance, including advanced age, transportation difficulties, long travel distance, femoral neck fracture and hip arthroplasty surgery.

Introduction: Up to one-third of patients with fragility hip fractures are totally dependent in the year following the injury which leads to later morbidity and mortality. Understanding the related factors that affect patients' ambulation helps health care providers prepare for the treatment plans to improve their functional outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the factors associated with independent walking disability in the early postoperative period after fragility hip fractures.

Material and methods: This retrospective cohort study involved 394 patients with fragility hip fractures with either intertrochanteric, subtrochanteric, or femoral neck fractures from January 2018 to June 2023. The related factors including preoperative demographics, perioperative, and postoperative factors, were collected and analyzed. The endpoint was the independent walking disability of patients at 6 weeks after surgery.

Results: 110 patients (27.9%) were disabled, whereas 284 patients (72.1%) could walk independently at postoperative 6 weeks. The multivariable risk ratio regression analysis showed that patients with age ≥80 years (RR 1.65; 95% CI 1.21-2.25; P = 0.001), pre-fracture walking with the gait aid (RR 2.03; 95% CI 1.53-2.69; P < 0.001), having ≥2 underlying comorbidities (RR 1.63; 95% CI 1.19-2.23; P = 0.002), preoperative hypoalbuminemia (RR 1.74; 95% CI 1.32-2.29; P < 0.001), and presence of the postoperative medical complication (RR 2.04; 95% CI 1.37-3.02; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with independent walking disability at the early postoperative period of 6 weeks.

Conclusions: Post-hip fracture surgery patients with the presence of postoperative medical complication have the highest risk of independent walking disability. Health care providers should concentrate on high-risk patients, correct the modifiable factors, and minimize any postoperative complications to improve functional recovery and decrease morbidity related to non-ambulation after fragility hip fractures.

Introduction: Geriatric fracture is a pressing global health issue, marked by elevated mortality and morbidity rates and escalating health care costs. The evolving health care system from fee-for-service to quality-based reimbursement has led to externally driven reward and reimbursement systems that may not account for the complexity of caring for older adults with fracture.

Significance: The aim of this review is to highlight the need for a shift towards meaningful metrics that impact geriatric fracture care and to issue a call to action for all medical societies to advocate for national reimbursement and ranking systems that focus on metrics that truly matter.

Results: Traditional metrics, while easier to capture, may not necessarily represent high quality care and may even have unintentional adverse consequences. For example, the focus on reducing length of stay may lead to older patients being discharged too early, without adequately addressing pain, constipation, or delirium. In addition, a focus on mortality may miss the opportunity to deliver compassionate end-of-life care. Existing geriatric fracture care metrics have expanded beyond traditional metrics to include assessment by geriatricians, fracture prevention, and delirium assessments. However, there is a need to further consider and develop patient-focused metrics. The Age-Friendly Health Initiative (4 Ms), which includes Mobility, Medication, Mentation, and what Matters is an evidence-based framework for assessing and acting on critical issues in the care of older adults. Additional metrics that should be considered include an assessment of nutrition and secondary fracture prevention.

Conclusion: In the realm of geriatric fracture care, the metrics currently employed often revolve around adherence to established guidelines and are heavily influenced by financial considerations. It is crucial to shift the paradigm towards metrics that truly matter for geriatric fracture patients, recognizing the multifaceted nature of their care and the profound impact these fractures have on their lives.

Introduction: The surgical approach of hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures remains debated. The study objective was to compare in-hospital outcomes for geriatric displaced femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty based on surgical approach (direct lateral vs. posterior approach).

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included geriatric patients (≥60 y/o) admitted 7/1/2016-3/31/2020 treated with hemiarthroplasty. Outcomes included: operative time (incision to closure), length of stay (HLOS), and blood loss volume (mL). The Harding direct lateral approach was compared to the posterior approach; P < .05.

Results: There were 164 patients (59% direct lateral, 41% posterior). Patients treated with the direct lateral approach had an advanced directive (P = .03), dementia, (P = .03), or were functionally dependent (P = .03) more often than patients treated with the posterior approach. Time to surgery was comparable between groups (P = .52). The direct lateral approach was associated with a shorter operative time (2.3 vs. 2.8 h, P = .03), a longer HLOS (5.0 vs. 4.0 days, P < .01), and a lower median volume of blood loss (50 vs. 100 mL, P = .01), than the posterior approach, respectively. In a stratified analysis, for those who were not functionally dependent, did not have dementia or an advanced directive, the direct lateral approach led to a longer HLOS (P = .03) and shorter operative time (P = .04) than the posterior approach. Whereas among those who were functionally dependent, had dementia or had an advanced directive, the direct lateral approach led to less blood loss (P = .02) than the posterior approach.

Discussion: While those treated with the direct lateral approach lost significantly less blood, they had a significantly longer HLOS than those treated with the posterior approach. Comorbidities significantly modified outcomes, which may suggest their presence could assist with treatment decisions.

Conclusions: This study found neither approach, the direct lateral nor posterior, to be superior. Surgical approach could remain physician preference.

Introduction: Adherence to best practices for care of hip fracture patients is fundamental to decreasing morbidity and mortality in older adults. This includes timely transfer from the hospital to rehabilitation soon after their surgical care. Hospitals experience challenges in implementing several best practices. We examined the potential barriers associated with timely discharge for patients who underwent a hip fracture surgery in an academic hospital in Ontario, Canada.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional review of a local database. We used descriptive statistics to characterize individuals according to the time of discharge after surgery. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with delayed discharge (>6 days post-surgery).

Results: A total of 492 patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between September 2019 and August 2020 were included in the study. The odds of having a delayed discharge occurred when patients had a higher frailty score (odds ratios [OR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02;1.38), experienced an episode of delirium (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.35;4.79), or were non-weightbearing (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.07;8.43). Patients were less likely to have a delayed discharge when the surgery was on a weekend (OR .50, 95% CI .32;.79) compared to a weekday, patients had a total hip replacement (OR .28, 95% CI .10;.80) or dynamic hip screw fixation (OR .49, 95% CI .25;.98) compared to intramedullary nails, or patients who were discharged to long-term care (OR .05, 95% CI .02;.13), home (OR .26, 95% CI .15;.46), or transferred to another specialty in the hospital (OR .49, 95% CI .29;.84) compared to inpatient rehabilitation.

Conclusions: Clinical and organizational factors can operate as potential barriers to timely discharge after hip fracture surgery. Further research is needed to understand how to overcome these barriers and implement strategies to improve best practice for post-surgery hip fracture care.

Introduction: Elder abuse is a prevalent, though often overlooked and underreported, cause of musculoskeletal injury in the elderly population. The purpose of this review is to provide an updated overview of the prevalence of elder abuse, its association with musculoskeletal injuries, and the available resources to aid orthopaedic surgeons in early detection and intervention.

Significance: Improved training on this topic is needed throughout the medical education of orthopaedic surgeons to effectively recognize and address elder abuse. Our findings reveal an urgent need for increased awareness, education, and collaboration among healthcare professionals to address this significant public health concern. As the aging population continues to grow, understanding the connection between elder abuse and musculoskeletal injuries is essential for providing comprehensive care to older adults.

Results: This review offers practical recommendations for identifying individuals at risk of elder abuse and outlines strategies for intervention. Indicators of abuse range from obvious signs like dirty clothes, neglect, and unattended injuries from falls, to more subtle cues requiring careful observation and questioning, such as mental health symptoms and family histories of abuse.

Conclusion: By shedding light on this often-overlooked issue, this review advocates for a proactive approach to identifying and addressing elder abuse to safeguard the well-being and quality of life of older individuals.