首页 > 最新文献

Nurse Education in Practice最新文献

英文 中文
The effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation training in emergency and critical care nursing education for undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis 高保真度模拟训练在本科护生急危护理教育中的有效性:系统回顾与meta分析
IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104731
Jinfang Wang , Jie Sun , Jie Song , Na Li , Kaili Lv , Kexin Pu

Aim

This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) training for teaching emergency and critical care nursing to undergraduate students, assessing outcomes in terms of knowledge scores, skill performance and critical thinking competency.

Background

HFS training is a significant teaching method to enhance the emergency response capabilities of nursing students. However, a comprehensive conclusion regarding its application in emergency and critical care nursing education is lacking.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Method

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and SinoMed for eligible articles published in English or Chinese from inception until December 31, 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies using Cochrane RoB 1 and JBI tools. A systematic review and meta-analysis were then performed using Review Manager 5.4.

Results

Following PRISMA guidelines, 11 studies were included after rigorous screening. The meta-analysis showed that HFS training significantly improved undergraduate nursing students' theoretical knowledge scores [SMD = 1.76, 95 % CI (1.03, 2.49), P < 0.001] and retention, as well as operational skill scores [SMD = 1.51, 95 % CI (1.22, 1.80), P < 0.001] and retention. However, the effect of HFS on improving students' critical thinking ability and its retention remains inconclusive.

Conclusions

HFS training can significantly improve undergraduate nursing students' knowledge, skills and their retention in the context of emergency and critical care nursing. Its impact on critical thinking requires further verification. Future studies should include more rigorous randomized controlled trials.
目的评价高保真模拟(high-fidelity simulation, HFS)训练在本科急危护理教学中的效果,从知识得分、技能表现和批判性思维能力三个方面评估效果。背景dhfs培训是提高护生应急能力的重要教学手段。然而,对其在急危护理教育中的应用还缺乏全面的结论。设计系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法检索PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL、Embase、CNKI、VIP、万方数据和中国医学信息网,检索自开刊至2024年12月31日期间发表的符合条件的中英文文章。两名研究人员独立筛选文献,提取数据,并使用Cochrane RoB 1和JBI工具评估纳入研究的质量。然后使用review Manager 5.4进行系统评价和荟萃分析。结果遵循PRISMA指南,经过严格筛选,纳入了11项研究。meta分析显示,HFS培训显著提高了本科护生的理论知识得分[SMD = 1.76,95 % CI (1.03, 2.49), P <; 0.001]和操作技能得分[SMD = 1.51,95 % CI (1.22, 1.80), P <; 0.001]和保留率。然而,HFS对学生批判性思维能力的提高和保持的效果还没有定论。结论shfs培训能显著提高本科护生在急危重症护理情境下的知识、技能和记忆力。它对批判性思维的影响需要进一步验证。未来的研究应包括更严格的随机对照试验。
{"title":"The effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation training in emergency and critical care nursing education for undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Jinfang Wang ,&nbsp;Jie Sun ,&nbsp;Jie Song ,&nbsp;Na Li ,&nbsp;Kaili Lv ,&nbsp;Kexin Pu","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104731","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104731","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) training for teaching emergency and critical care nursing to undergraduate students, assessing outcomes in terms of knowledge scores, skill performance and critical thinking competency.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>HFS training is a significant teaching method to enhance the emergency response capabilities of nursing students. However, a comprehensive conclusion regarding its application in emergency and critical care nursing education is lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We searched PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and SinoMed for eligible articles published in English or Chinese from inception until December 31, 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies using Cochrane RoB 1 and JBI tools. A systematic review and meta-analysis were then performed using Review Manager 5.4.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Following PRISMA guidelines, 11 studies were included after rigorous screening. The meta-analysis showed that HFS training significantly improved undergraduate nursing students' theoretical knowledge scores [SMD = 1.76, 95 % CI (1.03, 2.49), P &lt; 0.001] and retention, as well as operational skill scores [SMD = 1.51, 95 % CI (1.22, 1.80), P &lt; 0.001] and retention. However, the effect of HFS on improving students' critical thinking ability and its retention remains inconclusive.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>HFS training can significantly improve undergraduate nursing students' knowledge, skills and their retention in the context of emergency and critical care nursing. Its impact on critical thinking requires further verification. Future studies should include more rigorous randomized controlled trials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 104731"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146026277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Virtual clinical simulation as a pedagogical strategy in healthcare learning: Evidence and gap map 虚拟临床模拟作为医疗保健学习的教学策略:证据和差距图。
IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2026-01-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104713
Monica Motta Lino , Jamille Costa Engler , Joice Cristina Guesser , Luiza Sheyla Evenni Porfirio Will Castro , Janaina da Silva Flôr , Felipa Rafaela Amadigi , Mônica Oliveira Batista Oriá , Amina Regina Silva , Desiree A. Díaz

Aim

To map and characterize, systematically, the volume, scope and distribution of systematic review evidence on virtual clinical simulation in healthcare education, describing the educational outcomes assessed, the contexts and modalities where virtual simulations have been implemented and the main evidence gaps identified.

Background

Virtual clinical simulations are increasingly used to support healthcare education and training. However, existing evidence on their effectiveness remains fragmented, with variations in methodological quality and scope.

Design

Evidence and Gap Map (EGM) following Campbell Collaboration Guidance.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across nine databases and two gray literature sources. Eligible studies included systematic reviews examining healthcare professionals or students using virtual simulations. Data were extracted using the PICOS framework and reviewed independently by two researchers. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2 and confidence in findings was appraised using CERQual.

Results

A total of 118 reviews met inclusion criteria: 91 systematic, 25 scoping and 2 umbrella reviews. Most were published within the past four years and originated from high-income countries. We identified seven categories across the results: (1) Learning and Knowledge Acquisition; (2) User Perception; (3) Development of Technical Skills; (4) Simulation Performance; (5) Development of Practical Skills; (6) Transfer to Real Clinical Practice; and (7) Program Effectiveness. More than half of the systematic reviews were rated as low or critically low quality, with only 10 % achieving high methodological rigour.

Conclusions

Virtual clinical simulations demonstrate potential to enhance learning outcomes in healthcare education. However, evidence is limited by uneven methodological quality, concentration in high-income settings and a lack of research on emerging technologies and long-term educational impacts. Future high-quality, comparative studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base.
目的:系统地绘制和描述医疗保健教育中虚拟临床模拟的系统评价证据的数量、范围和分布,描述评估的教育成果、实施虚拟模拟的背景和模式,以及确定的主要证据差距。背景:虚拟临床模拟越来越多地用于支持医疗保健教育和培训。然而,关于其有效性的现有证据仍然零散,方法质量和范围各不相同。设计:证据和差距图(EGM)遵循坎贝尔合作指南。方法:系统检索9个数据库和2个灰色文献来源。符合条件的研究包括使用虚拟模拟检查医疗保健专业人员或学生的系统综述。使用PICOS框架提取数据,并由两名研究人员独立审查。使用AMSTAR-2评估方法学质量,使用CERQual评估结果的可信度。结果:共有118篇评价符合纳入标准:系统评价91篇,范围评价25篇,总括性评价2篇。这些研究大多是在过去4年里发表的,来自高收入国家。我们在结果中确定了七个类别:(1)学习和知识获取;(2)用户感知;(3)技术技能的发展;(4)仿真性能;(5)实践技能的培养;(6)转入真正的临床实践;(7)项目有效性。超过一半的系统评价被评为低质量或极低质量,只有10% %达到高方法严谨性。结论:虚拟临床模拟显示了提高医疗保健教育学习成果的潜力。然而,证据受到方法质量参差不齐、集中在高收入环境以及缺乏对新兴技术和长期教育影响的研究的限制。未来需要高质量的比较研究来加强证据基础。
{"title":"Virtual clinical simulation as a pedagogical strategy in healthcare learning: Evidence and gap map","authors":"Monica Motta Lino ,&nbsp;Jamille Costa Engler ,&nbsp;Joice Cristina Guesser ,&nbsp;Luiza Sheyla Evenni Porfirio Will Castro ,&nbsp;Janaina da Silva Flôr ,&nbsp;Felipa Rafaela Amadigi ,&nbsp;Mônica Oliveira Batista Oriá ,&nbsp;Amina Regina Silva ,&nbsp;Desiree A. Díaz","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104713","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104713","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To map and characterize, systematically, the volume, scope and distribution of systematic review evidence on virtual clinical simulation in healthcare education, describing the educational outcomes assessed, the contexts and modalities where virtual simulations have been implemented and the main evidence gaps identified.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Virtual clinical simulations are increasingly used to support healthcare education and training. However, existing evidence on their effectiveness remains fragmented, with variations in methodological quality and scope.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Evidence and Gap Map (EGM) following Campbell Collaboration Guidance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted across nine databases and two gray literature sources. Eligible studies included systematic reviews examining healthcare professionals or students using virtual simulations. Data were extracted using the PICOS framework and reviewed independently by two researchers. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2 and confidence in findings was appraised using CERQual.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 118 reviews met inclusion criteria: 91 systematic, 25 scoping and 2 umbrella reviews. Most were published within the past four years and originated from high-income countries. We identified seven categories across the results: (1) Learning and Knowledge Acquisition; (2) User Perception; (3) Development of Technical Skills; (4) Simulation Performance; (5) Development of Practical Skills; (6) Transfer to Real Clinical Practice; and (7) Program Effectiveness. More than half of the systematic reviews were rated as low or critically low quality, with only 10 % achieving high methodological rigour.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Virtual clinical simulations demonstrate potential to enhance learning outcomes in healthcare education. However, evidence is limited by uneven methodological quality, concentration in high-income settings and a lack of research on emerging technologies and long-term educational impacts. Future high-quality, comparative studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 104713"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146020238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Student-led midwifery clinics as an innovative practice placement model: A mixed method evaluation 学生主导的助产诊所作为一种创新的实习安置模式:一种混合方法评估。
IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2026-01-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104727
Amanda Gaye Carter , Marnie Icim , Nikki Tickle , Hannah McCallum , Valerie Slavin

Aim

Explore the experiences of pre-registration midwifery students undertaking midwifery practice experience within a university facilitated student-led midwifery clinic and compare their experiences with students within traditional placement models.

Background

Availability of midwifery placements and current student attrition limits the ability to increase midwifery graduates. To retain and prepare students for their future role as midwives, students require high quality and positive midwifery practice experiences.

Design

Mixed method descriptive design including a cross-sectional survey and focus group.

Methods

Midwifery students (n = 146) attending one South East Queensland University in Australia were invited to participate and complete the Clinical Practice Environment scale of the Midwifery Students' Experience of Practice tool (MidSTEP). Results were compared between students who completed placement in a traditional model and those who experienced placement in a student-led clinic. In addition, a focus group was held with seven of the 14 students that experienced placement in the student-led midwifery clinic.

Results

Students rated 15 of the 16 items in the Clinical Practice Environment scale of MidSTEP statistically significantly higher when placed with the student-led midwifery clinic (n = 14) compared with students in traditional placement models (n = 68). Thematic analysis using Braun and Clarke’s six stages revealed four themes: 1) Enhanced continuity relationships; 2) A safe space; 3) Alignment with midwifery philosophy; 4) Taking the lead.

Conclusions

Student-led midwifery clinics can optimise student learning, increase placements opportunities and increase student confidence in midwifery practice. In addition, being supervised by an Endorsed midwife facilitates students to experience the full scope of midwifery practice.
目的:探讨预注册助产学学生在大学助产诊所进行助产实践的经历,并将他们的经历与传统安置模式下的学生进行比较。背景:助产实习的可用性和目前的学生流失限制了增加助产毕业生的能力。为了留住和培养学生成为未来的助产士,学生需要高质量和积极的助产实践经验。设计:混合方法描述性设计,包括横断面调查和焦点小组。方法:邀请澳大利亚一所东南昆士兰大学的助产学学生(n = 146)参与并完成助产学学生实践体验工具(MidSTEP)的临床实践环境量表。结果比较了在传统模式中完成安置的学生和在学生主导的诊所中经历安置的学生。此外,14名学生中有7名在学生主导的助产诊所实习。结果:与传统安置模式(n = 68)的学生相比,在学生主导的助产诊所安置的学生对MidSTEP临床实践环境量表16个项目中的15个项目的评分有统计学意义上的提高(n = 14)。运用Braun和Clarke的六个阶段理论进行主题分析,揭示了四个主题:1)增强的连续性关系;2)安全空间;3)与助产理念一致;4)带头。结论:学生主导的助产诊所可以优化学生的学习,增加实习机会,提高学生对助产实践的信心。此外,由认可助产士监督,有助于学生体验助产实践的全部范围。
{"title":"Student-led midwifery clinics as an innovative practice placement model: A mixed method evaluation","authors":"Amanda Gaye Carter ,&nbsp;Marnie Icim ,&nbsp;Nikki Tickle ,&nbsp;Hannah McCallum ,&nbsp;Valerie Slavin","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104727","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104727","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Explore the experiences of pre-registration midwifery students undertaking midwifery practice experience within a university facilitated student-led midwifery clinic and compare their experiences with students within traditional placement models.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Availability of midwifery placements and current student attrition limits the ability to increase midwifery graduates. To retain and prepare students for their future role as midwives, students require high quality and positive midwifery practice experiences.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Mixed method descriptive design including a cross-sectional survey and focus group.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Midwifery students (n = 146) attending one South East Queensland University in Australia were invited to participate and complete the Clinical Practice Environment scale of the Midwifery Students' Experience of Practice tool (MidSTEP). Results were compared between students who completed placement in a traditional model and those who experienced placement in a student-led clinic. In addition, a focus group was held with seven of the 14 students that experienced placement in the student-led midwifery clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Students rated 15 of the 16 items in the Clinical Practice Environment scale of MidSTEP statistically significantly higher when placed with the student-led midwifery clinic (n = 14) compared with students in traditional placement models (n = 68). Thematic analysis using Braun and Clarke’s six stages revealed four themes: 1) Enhanced continuity relationships; 2) A safe space; 3) Alignment with midwifery philosophy; 4) Taking the lead.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Student-led midwifery clinics can optimise student learning, increase placements opportunities and increase student confidence in midwifery practice. In addition, being supervised by an Endorsed midwife facilitates students to experience the full scope of midwifery practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 104727"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146012946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Innovative strategies in oncology education for undergraduate students: A rapid systematic review 本科肿瘤学教育的创新策略:快速系统综述
IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104723
Susana Miguel , Helga Martins , José Moreira

Aim

This rapid review was to inform the innovative strategies for teaching oncology to undergraduate nursing students.

Background

Oncology nursing education has become a priority owing to the increasing demand for specialized, person-centered care. Oncology care is recognized as a complex and challenging area in clinical practice and in education, requiring students to possess not only technical knowledge but also communication skills, empathy and decision-making abilities in delicate situations.

Design

A rapid systematic review was conducted in April 2025.

Methods

Four databases were searched: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and SCOPUS. The included studies focused on innovative teaching strategies, in undergraduate oncology nursing education, were primary research and were written in English or Portuguese. The review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Study quality assessed using JBI guidelines.

Results

Twenty-eight studies published between 1992 and 2025 were included in this review. The identified strategies comprised technological innovations (n = 15), such as clinical simulations, online educational programs and virtual reality; and non-technological approaches (n = 13), including case study analysis, concept mapping and multidisciplinary educational programs.

Conclusions

The integration of technological and non-technological strategies has shown itself is beneficial. A combined approach enables students to develop a broad and diverse set of competencies in oncology, promoting a more complete and effective educational experience.
目的对护理本科学生肿瘤学教学的创新策略进行综述。背景:由于对专业化、以人为本的护理需求的增加,口腔护理教育已成为一个优先事项。肿瘤护理在临床实践和教育中都被认为是一个复杂而具有挑战性的领域,不仅需要学生具备技术知识,还需要学生具备在微妙情况下的沟通技巧、同理心和决策能力。DesignA于2025年4月进行了快速系统审查。方法检索PubMed、Web of Science、the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature、SCOPUS等数据库。纳入的研究侧重于肿瘤学本科护理教育的创新教学策略,为初级研究,以英语或葡萄牙语撰写。按照JBI指南评估的系统评价和荟萃分析研究质量的首选报告项目进行评价。结果本综述纳入了1992年至2025年间发表的28项研究。确定的策略包括技术创新(n = 15),如临床模拟、在线教育计划和虚拟现实;以及非技术方法(n = 13),包括案例研究分析、概念映射和多学科教育计划。结论技术与非技术策略的结合是有益的。综合方法使学生在肿瘤学方面发展广泛和多样化的能力,促进更完整和有效的教育体验。
{"title":"Innovative strategies in oncology education for undergraduate students: A rapid systematic review","authors":"Susana Miguel ,&nbsp;Helga Martins ,&nbsp;José Moreira","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104723","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104723","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This rapid review was to inform the innovative strategies for teaching oncology to undergraduate nursing students.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Oncology nursing education has become a priority owing to the increasing demand for specialized, person-centered care. Oncology care is recognized as a complex and challenging area in clinical practice and in education, requiring students to possess not only technical knowledge but also communication skills, empathy and decision-making abilities in delicate situations.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A rapid systematic review was conducted in April 2025.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four databases were searched: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and SCOPUS. The included studies focused on innovative teaching strategies, in undergraduate oncology nursing education, were primary research and were written in English or Portuguese. The review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Study quality assessed using JBI guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-eight studies published between 1992 and 2025 were included in this review. The identified strategies comprised technological innovations (n = 15), such as clinical simulations, online educational programs and virtual reality; and non-technological approaches (n = 13), including case study analysis, concept mapping and multidisciplinary educational programs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The integration of technological and non-technological strategies has shown itself is beneficial. A combined approach enables students to develop a broad and diverse set of competencies in oncology, promoting a more complete and effective educational experience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 104723"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145979068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effectiveness of AI-based conversational agents in nursing education: A systematic review 基于人工智能的会话代理在护理教育中的有效性:系统回顾
IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104728
Jinseon Go , Yaeji Lee

Aim

Comprehensive evaluation of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs and NRCTs, respectively) on the effectiveness of AI-driven conversational agents in nursing education.

Background

AI-based conversational agents are innovative educational tools enhancing nursing students’ learning outcomes. However, evaluation of their educational effectiveness remains limited.

Design

Systematic review.

Methods

Three Korean database (RISS, KCI, DBpia) and three international database (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science) were searched from March 13, 2025 to April 25, 2025, to identify studies investigating the impact through either RCTs or NRCTs. Quality was appraised using Risk of Bias 2 for RCTs and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-I for NRCTs. Educational outcomes were analyzed based on Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model and Bloom’s taxonomy.

Results

A total of seven studies were reviewed. Four assessed Level 1 (reaction) and all seven assessed Level 2 (learning) as per Kirkpatrick’s model. Affective outcomes were confidence, self-directed learning, motivation and self-efficacy and cognitive outcomes were knowledge, clinical reasoning, critical thinking, problem-solving and learning achievement. Five studies demonstrated significant improvements in both cognitive and affective educational outcomes.

Conclusion

Conversational agents effectively enhanced cognitive and affective competencies in nursing students. Learner-initiated interactions were applied primarily in practice-oriented education, whereas system-initiated ones, in theoretical learning. Therefore, aligning interaction modes and feedback levels with educational purposes and content is essential to maximize learning outcomes. However, evaluation of long-term effects of conversational agent-based education and its impact at the organizational level is limited. Future research should adopt longitudinal and rigorously designed RCTs to provide robust evidence of educational effectiveness.
综合评价人工智能驱动会话代理在护理教育中的有效性的随机对照试验和非随机对照试验(分别为rct和NRCTs)。基于人工智能的会话代理是提高护理学生学习成果的创新教育工具。然而,对其教育效果的评价仍然有限。DesignSystematic审查。方法检索2025年3月13日至2025年4月25日期间的3个韩国数据库(RISS、KCI、DBpia)和3个国际数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science),筛选通过rct或nrct调查影响的研究。随机对照试验的偏倚风险为2,非随机对照试验的偏倚风险为1。根据Kirkpatrick的评价模型和Bloom的分类法对教育成果进行了分析。结果共回顾了7项研究。根据柯克帕特里克的模型,4人评估1级(反应),7人评估2级(学习)。情感结果为自信、自主学习、动机和自我效能,认知结果为知识、临床推理、批判性思维、解决问题和学习成绩。五项研究表明,认知和情感教育成果都有显著改善。结论会话代理能有效提高护生的认知能力和情感能力。学习者发起的互动主要应用于以实践为导向的教育,而系统发起的互动则主要应用于理论学习。因此,将互动模式和反馈水平与教育目的和内容相一致,对于最大限度地提高学习效果至关重要。然而,对会话主体教育的长期效果及其在组织层面上的影响的评估是有限的。未来的研究应采用纵向和严格设计的随机对照试验,以提供有力的证据证明教育的有效性。
{"title":"The effectiveness of AI-based conversational agents in nursing education: A systematic review","authors":"Jinseon Go ,&nbsp;Yaeji Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104728","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104728","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Comprehensive evaluation of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs and NRCTs, respectively) on the effectiveness of AI-driven conversational agents in nursing education.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>AI-based conversational agents are innovative educational tools enhancing nursing students’ learning outcomes. However, evaluation of their educational effectiveness remains limited.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Three Korean database (RISS, KCI, DBpia) and three international database (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science) were searched from March 13, 2025 to April 25, 2025, to identify studies investigating the impact through either RCTs or NRCTs. Quality was appraised using Risk of Bias 2 for RCTs and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-I for NRCTs. Educational outcomes were analyzed based on Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model and Bloom’s taxonomy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of seven studies were reviewed. Four assessed Level 1 (reaction) and all seven assessed Level 2 (learning) as per Kirkpatrick’s model. Affective outcomes were confidence, self-directed learning, motivation and self-efficacy and cognitive outcomes were knowledge, clinical reasoning, critical thinking, problem-solving and learning achievement. Five studies demonstrated significant improvements in both cognitive and affective educational outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Conversational agents effectively enhanced cognitive and affective competencies in nursing students. Learner-initiated interactions were applied primarily in practice-oriented education, whereas system-initiated ones, in theoretical learning. Therefore, aligning interaction modes and feedback levels with educational purposes and content is essential to maximize learning outcomes. However, evaluation of long-term effects of conversational agent-based education and its impact at the organizational level is limited. Future research should adopt longitudinal and rigorously designed RCTs to provide robust evidence of educational effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 104728"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145978372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of a transformative learning program on cultural competence of Chinese nurses in a tertiary hospital: A randomized controlled trial study 转型学习计划对三级医院中国护士文化能力的影响:一项随机对照试验研究。
IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104725
Lingzhi Zhang , Acharaporn Sripusananpan , Cai Duanying , Patraporn Bhatarasakoon

Aim

To evaluate the effect of a transformative learning program on enhancing nurses’ cultural competence in a Chinese tertiary hospital.

Background

Cultural competence underpins high-quality nursing care in diverse health care settings; however, evidence on transformative learning approaches to enhance cultural competency in China, where cultural diversity has grown substantially, remains limited.

Design

Parallel group randomized controlled trial.

Methods

One hundred and forty nurses were randomized to the experimental group (n = 70) and the control group (n = 70). The experimental group underwent a nine-week intervention grounded in Leininger’s Culture Care Theory and Mezirow’s Transformative Learning Theory, whereas the control group received standard education. Cultural competence was assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention and 12 weeks post-intervention using the Chinese Cultural Competence Inventory for Nurses.

Results

Of 132 completers, the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher overall competence than the control group (p < 0.05), with significant improvements in the domains of knowledge, skills, respect and understanding, while no significant difference was observed for cultural awareness.

Conclusions

The program effectively enhanced overall and multiple dimensions of cultural competence, supporting transformative learning as a valuable strategy in nurse education and professional development.
目的:评价转型学习项目对提高三级医院护士文化能力的效果。背景:在不同的医疗保健环境中,文化能力是高质量护理的基础;然而,在文化多样性显著增长的中国,关于通过变革性学习方法提高文化能力的证据仍然有限。设计:平行组随机对照试验。方法:140名护士随机分为实验组(n = 70)和对照组(n = 70)。实验组接受了以莱宁格的文化关怀理论和梅齐罗的变革学习理论为基础的为期9周的干预,而对照组接受的是标准教育。文化能力在基线、干预后立即和干预后12周使用中国护士文化能力量表进行评估。结果:在132名完成者中,实验组表现出显著高于对照组的整体能力(p )。结论:该计划有效地提高了整体和多个维度的文化能力,支持变革学习作为护士教育和专业发展的一种有价值的策略。
{"title":"Effect of a transformative learning program on cultural competence of Chinese nurses in a tertiary hospital: A randomized controlled trial study","authors":"Lingzhi Zhang ,&nbsp;Acharaporn Sripusananpan ,&nbsp;Cai Duanying ,&nbsp;Patraporn Bhatarasakoon","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104725","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104725","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate the effect of a transformative learning program on enhancing nurses’ cultural competence in a Chinese tertiary hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cultural competence underpins high-quality nursing care in diverse health care settings; however, evidence on transformative learning approaches to enhance cultural competency in China, where cultural diversity has grown substantially, remains limited.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Parallel group randomized controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>One hundred and forty nurses were randomized to the experimental group (n = 70) and the control group (n = 70). The experimental group underwent a nine-week intervention grounded in Leininger’s Culture Care Theory and Mezirow’s Transformative Learning Theory, whereas the control group received standard education. Cultural competence was assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention and 12 weeks post-intervention using the Chinese Cultural Competence Inventory for Nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 132 completers, the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher overall competence than the control group (p &lt; 0.05), with significant improvements in the domains of knowledge, skills, respect and understanding, while no significant difference was observed for cultural awareness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The program effectively enhanced overall and multiple dimensions of cultural competence, supporting transformative learning as a valuable strategy in nurse education and professional development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 104725"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146012920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparison of transition experiences and practice readiness of newly licensed nurses with in-person and virtual residency training: A national observational study 通过面对面和虚拟住院医师培训,比较新注册护士的过渡经验和实践准备:一项全国观察性研究
IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104721
Kari A. Mastro , Nicholas A. Giordano , Rosemary Polomano , Beth A. Smith , Karyn Book , James Ballinghoff , Colleen Mattioni

Aim

This study aims to compare the experiences of newly licensed nurses who completed either in-person or virtual Vizient/AACN Nurse Residency Programs™ at a national level.

Background

Nurse residency programs are known to improve retention and intention to stay yet few studies demonstrate a comparison of comprehensive longitudinal survey outcomes with representative samples of nurse-reported outcomes between in-person and virtual formats.

Design

Observational, comparative, longitudinal study

Methods

This study analyzed Vizient/AACN Nurse Residency Program™ longitudinal data from a national United States sample (N = 3153). Linear mixed-effects models examined differences in stand ard nurse-reported outcomes (e.g., Casey-Fink Survey) over time between March 2019 pre-pand emic hires receiving in person training and March 2020 pand emic hires when virtual training occurred.

Results

No statistically significant differences in Casey-Fink Survey Composite scores were observed between nurses in the 2019 and 2020 cohorts when adjusting for time, degree, GPA and previous degree (p = 0.210). The 2020 virtual cohort reported marginally lower Dissatisfaction (p = 0.020) and Leadership scores (p < 0.001), yet slightly higher Commitment scores (p = 0.040), compared with the 2019 new hires. On average, 2020 new hires reported more favorable feedback regarding their preceptors, however, they indicated lower scores for peer interactions and support.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that virtual nurse residency programs can achieve comparable outcomes to traditional in-person formats and may provide a scalable option for rural or resource-limited settings. Future studies should explore long-term retention outcomes and strategies to improve peer engagement in virtual environments.
目的本研究旨在比较在全国范围内完成现场或虚拟Vizient/AACN护士住院培训计划™的新执业护士的经验。众所周知,护士实习计划可以提高留校率和留校意愿,但很少有研究表明,在面对面和虚拟形式之间,综合纵向调查结果与护士报告结果的代表性样本进行了比较。设计:观察性、比较性、纵向研究方法本研究分析了来自美国全国样本的Vizient/AACN护士住院医师计划™的纵向数据(N = 3153)。线性混合效应模型检查了2019年3月接受现场培训的疫情前雇员和2020年3月接受虚拟培训的疫情前雇员之间的长期差异和护士报告的结果(例如Casey-Fink调查)。结果2019年和2020年队列护士在调整时间、学历、GPA和既往学历后,Casey-Fink调查综合评分差异无统计学意义(p = 0.210)。与2019年的新员工相比,2020年的虚拟队列报告的不满意度(p = 0.020)和领导力得分(p <; 0.001)略低,但承诺得分(p = 0.040)略高。平均而言,2020年的新员工对他们的导师有更积极的反馈,然而,他们在同伴互动和支持方面的得分较低。这些发现表明,虚拟护士住院医师项目可以达到与传统面对面形式相当的效果,并可能为农村或资源有限的环境提供可扩展的选择。未来的研究应该探索长期留存的结果和策略,以提高虚拟环境中的同伴参与度。
{"title":"A comparison of transition experiences and practice readiness of newly licensed nurses with in-person and virtual residency training: A national observational study","authors":"Kari A. Mastro ,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Giordano ,&nbsp;Rosemary Polomano ,&nbsp;Beth A. Smith ,&nbsp;Karyn Book ,&nbsp;James Ballinghoff ,&nbsp;Colleen Mattioni","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104721","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104721","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aims to compare the experiences of newly licensed nurses who completed either in-person or virtual Vizient/AACN Nurse Residency Programs™ at a national level.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nurse residency programs are known to improve retention and intention to stay yet few studies demonstrate a comparison of comprehensive longitudinal survey outcomes with representative samples of nurse-reported outcomes between in-person and virtual formats.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Observational, comparative, longitudinal study</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study analyzed Vizient/AACN Nurse Residency Program™ longitudinal data from a national United States sample (N = 3153). Linear mixed-effects models examined differences in stand ard nurse-reported outcomes (e.g., Casey-Fink Survey) over time between March 2019 pre-pand emic hires receiving in person training and March 2020 pand emic hires when virtual training occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No statistically significant differences in Casey-Fink Survey Composite scores were observed between nurses in the 2019 and 2020 cohorts when adjusting for time, degree, GPA and previous degree (<em>p</em> = 0.210). The 2020 virtual cohort reported marginally lower Dissatisfaction (<em>p</em> = 0.020) and Leadership scores (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), yet slightly higher Commitment scores (<em>p</em> = 0.040), compared with the 2019 new hires. On average, 2020 new hires reported more favorable feedback regarding their preceptors, however, they indicated lower scores for peer interactions and support.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings suggest that virtual nurse residency programs can achieve comparable outcomes to traditional in-person formats and may provide a scalable option for rural or resource-limited settings. Future studies should explore long-term retention outcomes and strategies to improve peer engagement in virtual environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 104721"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145978359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial intelligence-enhanced clinical reasoning in nurse practitioners: A systematic review 人工智能增强护士临床推理:系统综述
IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104724
Su-Ying Yu , Hui-Ping Lin , Ying-Mai Kung , Shu-Ching Chen

Aims

This systematic review aimed to synthesize the current evidence on artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced clinical reasoning among nurse practitioners (NPs).

Background

NPs require strong clinical reasoning skills and AI–based tools may support the development of these competencies; however, empirical evidence regarding their effectiveness remains limited. The strengthened literature review clearly identifies a critical gap, the absence of a prior systematic review specifically examining AI-enhanced clinical reasoning among NPs and will provid a strong rationale for the present review.

Design

Systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

Methods

Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase and CINAHL through July 2025. Of the 429 records retrieved, 13 met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies examined AI interventions targeting clinical reasoning among NPs. Risk of bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists and Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Data were extracted on study design, population, AI application domain, outcomes and quality appraisal.

Results

Thirteen studies were included: seven quantitative quasi-experimental, intervention validation, or retrospective cohort studies; three qualitative studies; and three systematic reviews. AI applications ranged from real-time monitoring and decision-support systems to simulation platforms and large language models, which supported clinical reasoning domains such as data gathering, hypothesis generation, diagnostic justification and reflective judgment. Quantitative studies showed improvements in diagnostic accuracy, consistency, efficiency and data collection, while qualitative studies found that NPs view AI as a supportive tool that enhances diagnostic reasoning and patient-centered care, while emphasizing the need for transparency, interpretability and workflow integration.

Conclusions

AI tools may strengthen NPs’ clinical reasoning by improving diagnostic accuracy, decision consistency and care efficiency, but their safe use requires rigorous validation, standardized evaluation, ethical safeguards and digital literacy training. Limitations include heterogeneous AI applications across professional groups and a predominance of simulation-based evidence over real-world clinical evaluations.
本系统综述旨在综合当前关于护士从业人员(NPs)中人工智能(AI)增强临床推理的证据。np需要很强的临床推理能力,基于人工智能的工具可以支持这些能力的发展;然而,关于其有效性的经验证据仍然有限。加强的文献综述清楚地发现了一个关键的空白,即缺乏先前专门研究人工智能增强临床推理的系统综述,并将为本综述提供有力的理论依据。按照PRISMA 2020指南进行系统审查。方法于2025年7月在PubMed、Embase和CINAHL中进行检索。在检索到的429条记录中,有13条符合纳入标准。符合条件的研究检查了针对NPs临床推理的人工智能干预措施。使用关键评估技能项目清单和乔安娜布里格斯研究所工具评估偏倚风险。从研究设计、人口、人工智能应用领域、结果和质量评价等方面提取数据。结果纳入13项研究:7项定量准实验、干预验证或回顾性队列研究;三个定性研究;还有三个系统的评价。从实时监测和决策支持系统到仿真平台和大型语言模型,人工智能应用范围广泛,支持数据收集、假设生成、诊断论证和反思判断等临床推理领域。定量研究表明,在诊断准确性、一致性、效率和数据收集方面有所改善,而定性研究发现,np将人工智能视为一种支持工具,可以增强诊断推理和以患者为中心的护理,同时强调透明度、可解释性和工作流程集成的必要性。结论ai工具可以通过提高诊断准确性、决策一致性和护理效率来加强NPs的临床推理能力,但其安全使用需要严格的验证、标准化的评估、道德保障和数字素养培训。局限性包括跨专业群体的异构人工智能应用,以及基于模拟的证据优于现实世界的临床评估。
{"title":"Artificial intelligence-enhanced clinical reasoning in nurse practitioners: A systematic review","authors":"Su-Ying Yu ,&nbsp;Hui-Ping Lin ,&nbsp;Ying-Mai Kung ,&nbsp;Shu-Ching Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104724","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104724","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This systematic review aimed to synthesize the current evidence on artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced clinical reasoning among nurse practitioners (NPs).</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>NPs require strong clinical reasoning skills and AI–based tools may support the development of these competencies; however, empirical evidence regarding their effectiveness remains limited. The strengthened literature review clearly identifies a critical gap, the absence of a prior systematic review specifically examining AI-enhanced clinical reasoning among NPs and will provid a strong rationale for the present review.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase and CINAHL through July 2025. Of the 429 records retrieved, 13 met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies examined AI interventions targeting clinical reasoning among NPs. Risk of bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists and Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Data were extracted on study design, population, AI application domain, outcomes and quality appraisal.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirteen studies were included: seven quantitative quasi-experimental, intervention validation, or retrospective cohort studies; three qualitative studies; and three systematic reviews. AI applications ranged from real-time monitoring and decision-support systems to simulation platforms and large language models, which supported clinical reasoning domains such as data gathering, hypothesis generation, diagnostic justification and reflective judgment. Quantitative studies showed improvements in diagnostic accuracy, consistency, efficiency and data collection, while qualitative studies found that NPs view AI as a supportive tool that enhances diagnostic reasoning and patient-centered care, while emphasizing the need for transparency, interpretability and workflow integration.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AI tools may strengthen NPs’ clinical reasoning by improving diagnostic accuracy, decision consistency and care efficiency, but their safe use requires rigorous validation, standardized evaluation, ethical safeguards and digital literacy training. Limitations include heterogeneous AI applications across professional groups and a predominance of simulation-based evidence over real-world clinical evaluations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 104724"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145979069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Construction of a competency evaluation index system for geriatric nursing positions in the context of new medical science: A Delphi study 新医学背景下老年护理岗位胜任力评价指标体系构建:德尔菲研究
IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104714
Shuyue Mu, Rongrong Wang, Xiangnan Wang, Yaqi Zhuang, Wenling Qiu, Guiyu Qu

Aim

To construct a competency evaluation index system for geriatric nursing positions in the context of new medical science.

Background

The new medical discipline is centered on the concept of population health, aiming to establish a comprehensive health service system that incorporates preventive measures, treatment and wellness strategies. It deeply integrates advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence and data science to achieve the digital and intelligent transformation of healthcare services. This places greater demands on the professional competence of nurses working in geriatric care positions. However, the precise competencies that nurses in China's geriatric care settings currently possess to meet the demands of high-quality elderly care remain unclear.

Design

A Delphi study.

Methods

Based on the onion model as a theoretical foundation, this study has preliminarily constructed a draft competency framework through evidence-based integration and behavioral event interviews. Two rounds of Delphi expert consultations were conducted with 19 specialists to revise and refine the indicator system.

Results

The evaluation indicator system comprises four primary indicators, 14 secondary indicators and 51 tertiary indicators, which include professionalism, theoretical knowledge, skills and personal characteristics. The response rates for the two rounds of expert questionnaires were 95 % and 89 %, respectively. The expert authority coefficients for the two rounds were 0.93 and 0.89, respectively.

Conclusion

The indicator system is scientifically sound and reliable, closely aligned with core characteristics such as digital intelligence and interdisciplinary integration. This provides a practical reference point for future development of geriatric care curricula and optimization of talent cultivation programs.
目的构建新医学背景下老年护理岗位胜任力评价指标体系。这门新的医学学科以人口健康的概念为中心,旨在建立一个综合的卫生服务体系,包括预防措施、治疗和健康策略。深度融合人工智能、数据科学等先进技术,实现医疗服务数字化、智能化转型。这对在老年护理岗位上工作的护士的专业能力提出了更高的要求。然而,目前中国老年护理机构的护士是否具备满足高质量老年护理需求的确切能力尚不清楚。设计Delphi研究。方法以洋葱模型为理论基础,通过循证整合和行为事件访谈,初步构建了初步的胜任力框架。与19名专家进行了两轮德尔菲专家咨询,对指标体系进行了修订和完善。结果评价指标体系包括4个一级指标、14个二级指标和51个三级指标,包括专业素养、理论知识、技能和个人特征。两轮专家问卷的回复率分别为95 %和89 %。两轮的专家权威系数分别为0.93和0.89。结论该指标体系科学健全、可靠,与数字化智能化、跨学科融合等核心特征紧密结合。这为今后老年护理课程的发展和人才培养方案的优化提供了实践参考点。
{"title":"Construction of a competency evaluation index system for geriatric nursing positions in the context of new medical science: A Delphi study","authors":"Shuyue Mu,&nbsp;Rongrong Wang,&nbsp;Xiangnan Wang,&nbsp;Yaqi Zhuang,&nbsp;Wenling Qiu,&nbsp;Guiyu Qu","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104714","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104714","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To construct a competency evaluation index system for geriatric nursing positions in the context of new medical science.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>The new medical discipline is centered on the concept of population health, aiming to establish a comprehensive health service system that incorporates preventive measures, treatment and wellness strategies. It deeply integrates advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence and data science to achieve the digital and intelligent transformation of healthcare services. This places greater demands on the professional competence of nurses working in geriatric care positions. However, the precise competencies that nurses in China's geriatric care settings currently possess to meet the demands of high-quality elderly care remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A Delphi study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Based on the onion model as a theoretical foundation, this study has preliminarily constructed a draft competency framework through evidence-based integration and behavioral event interviews. Two rounds of Delphi expert consultations were conducted with 19 specialists to revise and refine the indicator system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The evaluation indicator system comprises four primary indicators, 14 secondary indicators and 51 tertiary indicators, which include professionalism, theoretical knowledge, skills and personal characteristics. The response rates for the two rounds of expert questionnaires were 95 % and 89 %, respectively. The expert authority coefficients for the two rounds were 0.93 and 0.89, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The indicator system is scientifically sound and reliable, closely aligned with core characteristics such as digital intelligence and interdisciplinary integration. This provides a practical reference point for future development of geriatric care curricula and optimization of talent cultivation programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 104714"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145978369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enhancing student nurses’ cultural competence in the care of transgender individuals: An integrative review of educational approaches 提高学生护士在跨性别个体护理中的文化能力:教育方法的综合回顾
IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104720
Jane Mary Hager

Objective

This integrative review aimed to synthesise and critically examine educational strategies in improving cultural competence among pre-registration student nurses when caring for transgender patients. It also sought to inform future educational development and identify gaps for further research.

Background

The 2021 UK Census identified at least 262,000 individuals (0.5 % of the population) as transgender, though this is likely underestimated due to stigma and underreporting. Despite evolving public attitudes, 16 % of respondents in a 2019 survey admitted prejudice towards transgender people. The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC, 2018) emphasises dignified, non-discriminatory care for all, yet many LGBTQ+ individuals report negative healthcare experiences. Research consistently highlights gaps in education for healthcare professionals, affecting their confidence and ability to provide competent care for transgender individuals.

Design

An integrative review design was adopted, enabling the synthesis of diverse evidence sources to explore educational strategies that enhance cultural competence in pre-registration nursing curricula.

Methods

Using Whittemore and Knafl’s (2005) integrative review framework and Joanna Briggs Institute (2024) mixed-methods guidance, nine studies were synthesised. A constant comparison approach enabled integration of qualitative and quantitative findings.

Results

No single educational strategy emerged as most effective. However, multi-method approaches, especially those involving active learning were consistently linked to improvements in knowledge, attitudes and skills

Conclusion

Findings highlight the need for a standardised, comprehensive approach to cultural competence education in nursing curricula. Integrating such content has the potential to improve care quality, reducing health disparities and ensuring equitable, person-centred care for transgender individuals.
目的本综述旨在综合并批判性地考察在护理跨性别患者时提高预注册学生护士文化能力的教育策略。它还试图为未来的教育发展提供信息,并确定进一步研究的差距。2021年英国人口普查确定至少有26.2万人(占人口的0.5% %)是跨性别者,尽管由于污名和漏报,这一数字可能被低估了。尽管公众态度不断变化,但在2019年的一项调查中,16% 的受访者承认对跨性别者存在偏见。护理和助产委员会(NMC, 2018)强调为所有人提供有尊严的、非歧视的护理,但许多LGBTQ+ 个人报告了负面的医疗保健经历。研究一直强调医疗保健专业人员的教育差距,影响了他们为跨性别者提供合格护理的信心和能力。设计采用综合评价设计,综合多种证据来源,探讨提高注册前护理课程文化能力的教育策略。方法采用Whittemore and Knafl(2005)的综合综述框架和Joanna Briggs Institute(2024)的混合方法指导,对9项研究进行综合。不断比较的方法使定性和定量的研究结果得以整合。结果没有一种教育策略是最有效的。然而,多方法方法,特别是那些涉及主动学习的方法,始终与知识、态度和技能的改善有关。结论:研究结果强调了在护理课程中建立标准化、全面的文化能力教育方法的必要性。整合这些内容有可能提高护理质量,减少健康差距,并确保为跨性别者提供公平、以人为本的护理。
{"title":"Enhancing student nurses’ cultural competence in the care of transgender individuals: An integrative review of educational approaches","authors":"Jane Mary Hager","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104720","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104720","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This integrative review aimed to synthesise and critically examine educational strategies in improving cultural competence among pre-registration student nurses when caring for transgender patients. It also sought to inform future educational development and identify gaps for further research.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>The 2021 UK Census identified at least 262,000 individuals (0.5 % of the population) as transgender, though this is likely underestimated due to stigma and underreporting. Despite evolving public attitudes, 16 % of respondents in a 2019 survey admitted prejudice towards transgender people. The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC, 2018) emphasises dignified, non-discriminatory care for all, yet many LGBTQ+ individuals report negative healthcare experiences. Research consistently highlights gaps in education for healthcare professionals, affecting their confidence and ability to provide competent care for transgender individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>An integrative review design was adopted, enabling the synthesis of diverse evidence sources to explore educational strategies that enhance cultural competence in pre-registration nursing curricula.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using Whittemore and Knafl’s (2005) integrative review framework and Joanna Briggs Institute (2024) mixed-methods guidance, nine studies were synthesised. A constant comparison approach enabled integration of qualitative and quantitative findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No single educational strategy emerged as most effective. However, multi-method approaches, especially those involving active learning were consistently linked to improvements in knowledge, attitudes and skills</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings highlight the need for a standardised, comprehensive approach to cultural competence education in nursing curricula. Integrating such content has the potential to improve care quality, reducing health disparities and ensuring equitable, person-centred care for transgender individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 104720"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145978371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Nurse Education in Practice
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1