Journal for Healthcare Quality最新文献

Abstract: Physical therapy (PT) in inpatient settings is a limited and valuable resource. Inappropriate PT consultation is costly and can lead to delays in care and discharge planning. Baseline data at an academic hospital revealed that approximately one in four PT consults were inappropriate (n = 29,230) across all services, as defined by an activity measure post-acute care "6-Clicks" basic mobility score of >22. Our interdisciplinary quality improvement team used the Six Sigma methodology to address this problem. We performed a root-cause analysis that identified high-impact root causes and implemented two targeted interventions: (1) A modified electronic health record PT order with clinical-decision support, and (2) nursing role change to assume PT-ordering responsibility. The rate of inappropriate PT consults decreased from 23.9% to <10% postintervention across all inpatient units, with the nursing role change reaching statistical significance (p < .0019). Our multifaceted intervention contributed to a significant reduction in unnecessary PT consults, expediting evaluation of patients qualifying for skilled inpatient therapy.

Abstract: Symptoms of urgent maternal warning signs (UMWS) may occur during pregnancy or after delivery and may have lasting effects or indicate a life-threatening situation if left untreated. The state department of health sponsored a quality improvement project (QIP) to broaden the reach of UMWS education beyond traditional clinical settings, to public health settings where prenatal and postpartum women are seen. Specifically, the QIP implemented process changes to provide education (written and verbal) and resources to individuals receiving services from Women, Infants, and Children clinics during pregnancy and up to 12 weeks postpartum. Clinics submitted participant-level data although the Research Electronic Data Capture secure data portal. The key results indicated an increase in both written and verbal education. In addition, the project monitored referrals made specific to conditions identified through project-specific data collection and the provision of UMWS education.

Introduction: Penicillin allergy is the most commonly reported drug allergy in the United States. Patients labeled with penicillin allergy are at risk of receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics for surgical site infection prophylaxis, which can lead to increased antibiotic resistance, higher morbidity, suboptimal antibiotic therapy, and higher medical costs. This study aimed to determine the true prevalence of penicillin allergy among surgical patients and to decrease the unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent urogynecologic surgery in 2017. In 2018, a quality initiative was started, and all patients reporting penicillin allergies were offered antibiotic allergy testing as part of their preoperative testing.

Results: In 2017, 15% of patients reported penicillin allergy and 52% of them received surgical prophylaxis with broad-spectrum antibiotics. In 2018, 463 patients underwent surgery, 55 of whom reported penicillin allergy and were offered penicillin allergy testing. 35 (64%) agreed to proceed with testing, and of those tested, 33 (94%) tested negative for penicillin allergy.

Conclusions: 94% of patients with stated penicillin allergy who consented to allergy testing proved to have negative test. Penicillin allergy testing should be considered as part of preoperative management.

Abstract: Diabetes and hyperglycemia are associated with an increased risk of in-hospital complications that lead to longer lengths of stay, increased morbidity, higher mortality, and risk of readmission. Diabetes care and education specialists (DCESs) working in hospital settings are uniquely prepared and credentialed to serve as content experts to facilitate change and implement processes and programs to improve glycemic-related outcomes. A recent survey of DCESs explored the topic of productivity and clinical metrics. Outcomes highlighted the need to better evaluate the impact and value of inpatient DCESs, advocate for the role, and to expand diabetes care and education teams to optimize outcomes. The purpose of this article was to recommend strategies and metrics that can be used to quantify the work of inpatient DCESs and describe how such metrics can help to show the value of the inpatient DCES and assist in making a business case for the role.

Purpose: A primary cause of hospital readmission is medication-related problems (MRPs). Polypharmacy patients taking multiple medications concurrently experience an increased likelihood of MRPs and high occurrence of readmissions to the hospital within 30 days. This study assessed the ability of a pharmacist-led transition of care program to decrease readmissions in polypharmacy patients by evaluating and rectifying MRPs.

Methods: Over 16 months, patients admitted onto the medicine ward service with ≥10 home medications ( n = 536) received medication management interventions from a clinical pharmacist including admission interview, medication reconciliation and consultation, and postdischarge phone follow-up. Admitted patients taking fewer than 10 home medications during the same time served as the control group and received routine standard of care ( n = 2317).

Results: The polypharmacy group who received the pharmacist-led intervention had a statistically significantly lower 30-day readmission rate (8.8%) compared with patients in the control group (12.4%; X 2 = 5.63, p = .01). Patients receiving pharmacist intervention were 33% less likely to be readmitted within 30 days of discharge compared with the control group (odds ratio = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.49-0.94). All patients had at least one medication-related discrepancy.

Conclusion: This pharmacy-led transition of care program can effectively reduce readmission rates through resolution of medication-related problems.

Background: Delays in operating room (OR) first-case start times can cause additional costs for hospitals, healthcare team frustration and delay in patient care. Here, a novel process improvement strategy to improving first-case start times is presented.

Methods: First case in room start times were recorded for ORs at an academic medical center. Three interventions-automatic preoperative orders, dot phrases to permit re-creation of unavailable consent forms, and improved H&P linking to the surgical encounter-were implemented to target documentation-related delays. Monthly percentages of first-case on-time starts (FCOTS) and time saved were compared with the "preintervention" time period, and total cost savings were estimated.

Results: During the first 3-months after implementation of the interventions, the percentage of FCOTS improved from an average of 36.7%-52.7%. Total time savings across all ORs over the same time period was found to be 55.63 hours, which is estimated to have saved a total of $121,834.52 over the 3-month interventional period.

Conclusions: By implementing multiple quality improvement interventions, delays to first start in room OR cases can be meaningfully reduced. Quality improvement protocols targeted toward root causes of OR delays can be a significant driver to reduce healthcare costs.

Introduction: Quality improvement (QI) is a useful methodology for improving healthcare, often through iterative changes. There is no prior review on the application of QI in physical therapy (PT).

Purpose and relevance: To characterize and evaluate the quality of the QI literature in PT.

Methods: We searched four electronic databases from inception through September 1, 2022. Included publications focused on QI and included the practice of PT. Quality was assessed using the 16-point QI Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) appraisal tool.

Results: Seventy studies were included in the review, 60 of which were published since 2014 with most ( n = 47) from the United States. Acute care ( n = 41) was the most prevalent practice setting. Twenty-two studies (31%) did not use QI models or approaches and only nine studies referenced Revised Standards for QI Reporting Excellence guidelines. The median QI-MQCS score was 12 (range 7-15).

Conclusions/implications: Quality improvement publications in the PT literature are increasing, yet there is a paucity of QI studies pertaining to most practice settings and a lack of rigor in project design and reporting. Many studies were of low-to-moderate quality and did not meet minimum reporting standards. We recommend use of models, frameworks, and reporting guidelines to improve methodologic rigor and reporting.

Background: Low-value care is healthcare leading to no or little clinical benefit for the patient. The best (combinations of) interventions to reduce low-value care are unclear.

Purpose: To provide an overview of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating deimplementation strategies, to quantify the effectiveness and describe different combinations of strategies.

Methods: Analysis of 121 RCTs (1990-2019) evaluating a strategy to reduce low-value care, identified by a systematic review. Deimplementation strategies were described and associations between strategy characteristics and effectiveness explored.

Results: Of 109 trials comparing deimplementation to usual care, 75 (69%) reported a significant reduction of low-value healthcare practices. Seventy-three trials included in a quantitative analysis showed a median relative reduction of 17% (IQR 7%-42%). The effectiveness of deimplementation strategies was not associated with the number and types of interventions applied.

Conclusions and implications: Most deimplementation strategies achieved a considerable reduction of low-value care. We found no signs that a particular type or number of interventions works best for deimplementation. Future deimplementation studies should map relevant contextual factors, such as the workplace culture or economic factors. Interventions should be tailored to these factors and provide details regarding sustainability of the effect.

Abstract: This mixed-methods study aims to understand what the perceptions of leaders and healthcare professionals are regarding causes of disparities, cultural competence, and motivation before launching a disparity reduction project in hypertension care, contrasting perceptions in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), and in a non-FQHC system. We interviewed leaders of six participating primary care systems and surveyed providers and staff. FQHC respondents reported more positive cultural competence attitudes and behavior, higher motivation to implement the project, and less concern about barriers to caring for disadvantaged patients than those in the non-FQHC practices; however, egalitarian beliefs were similar among all. Qualitative analysis suggested that the organizational missions of the FQHCs reflect their critical role in serving vulnerable populations. All system leaders were aware of the challenges of provider care to underserved groups, but comprehensive initiatives to address social determinants of health and improve cultural competence were still needed in both system types. The study provides insights into the perceptions and motivations of primary care organizational leaders and providers who are interested in improving chronic care. It also offers an example for care disparity programs to understand commitment and values of the participants for tailoring interventions and setting baseline for progress.

Abstract: The incidence of medication administration errors (MAEs) and associated patient harm continue to plague hospitals worldwide. Moreover, there is a lack of evidence to address this problem, especially in Africa. This research synthesis was intended to provide current evidence to decrease the incidence of MAEs in Africa. Standardized search criteria were used to identify primary studies that reported the incidence and/or predictors of MAEs in Africa. Included studies met specifications and were validated with a quality-appraisal tool. The pooled incidence of MAEs in African hospitals was estimated to be 0.56 (CI: 0.4324-0.6770) with a 0.13-0.93 prediction interval. The primary estimates were highly heterogeneous. Most MAEs are explained by system failure and patient factors. The contribution of system factors can be minimized through adequate and ongoing training of nurses on the aspects of safe medication administration. In addition, ensuring the availability of drug use guidelines in hospitals, and minimizing disruptions during the medication process can decrease the incidence of MAEs in Africa.