Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-09DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000710
Megan Bowers, Irene J Higginson, Matthew Maddocks
Purpose of review: To explore the contributions of recent qualitative literature in progressing understanding of the experiences of cancer cachexia, and its management, from the perspectives of patients and unpaid/family carers.
Recent findings: Challenges with conducting everyday activities, maintaining independence, and continuing usual roles within the family are sources of distress. Patients and carers value individualization, flexibility, and carer involvement in physical activity/exercise interventions. In psychosocial/educational interventions that were positively perceived, the opportunity to talk about cachexia was appreciated, leading to improved health literacy, awareness about nutrition, and relationships with food. However, the general patient and carer experience around clinical acknowledgement and management of cachexia remains poor.
Summary: Eating-related distress and conflicts, lack of understanding about cachexia, and the visibility of weight loss remain recurring themes amongst literature on experiences of cancer cachexia. Studies exploring preferences for, and experiences of, interventions have primarily focused on physical activity or exercise. Psychosocial/educational and physical activity/exercise interventions are valued and perceived to alleviate some of the key quality of life issues amongst patients with cancer cachexia and their unpaid/family carers.
{"title":"Patient and carer experiences of cancer cachexia and its management.","authors":"Megan Bowers, Irene J Higginson, Matthew Maddocks","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000710","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000710","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To explore the contributions of recent qualitative literature in progressing understanding of the experiences of cancer cachexia, and its management, from the perspectives of patients and unpaid/family carers.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Challenges with conducting everyday activities, maintaining independence, and continuing usual roles within the family are sources of distress. Patients and carers value individualization, flexibility, and carer involvement in physical activity/exercise interventions. In psychosocial/educational interventions that were positively perceived, the opportunity to talk about cachexia was appreciated, leading to improved health literacy, awareness about nutrition, and relationships with food. However, the general patient and carer experience around clinical acknowledgement and management of cachexia remains poor.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Eating-related distress and conflicts, lack of understanding about cachexia, and the visibility of weight loss remain recurring themes amongst literature on experiences of cancer cachexia. Studies exploring preferences for, and experiences of, interventions have primarily focused on physical activity or exercise. Psychosocial/educational and physical activity/exercise interventions are valued and perceived to alleviate some of the key quality of life issues amongst patients with cancer cachexia and their unpaid/family carers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"132-137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141564883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000716
Iain Phillips, Lise Nottelmann, Mark Stares
Purpose of review: Comprehensive supportive care interventions for patients with lung cancer are being investigated in a range of ways, including: early palliative care, prehabilitation and rehabilitation. We review recent literature on supportive care and propose a traffic light system to individualise comprehensive supportive care. Green for those very likely to receive anti-cancer treatment, red for those very unlikely to receive anti-cancer treatment and orange where the chance of accessing treatment is uncertain. Comprehensive supportive care can be individualised based on the group a particular patient is in.
Recent findings: Lung cancer outcomes are improving with the availability of increasingly efficacious treatments; however, treatment rates for advanced disease remain low. In this review, we discuss how person-centred outcomes could be improved, how outcomes can be prognosticated and how the 'host' can be staged as well as the cancer. Recent data suggests that early comprehensive supportive care improves quality of life, reduces time spent in hospital and may affect survival.
Summary: Comprehensive supportive care is likely to improve quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer. Further work is needed to see if it can improve treatment rates and survival.
{"title":"A traffic light approach for treatment and supportive care stratification in lung cancer.","authors":"Iain Phillips, Lise Nottelmann, Mark Stares","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000716","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000716","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Comprehensive supportive care interventions for patients with lung cancer are being investigated in a range of ways, including: early palliative care, prehabilitation and rehabilitation. We review recent literature on supportive care and propose a traffic light system to individualise comprehensive supportive care. Green for those very likely to receive anti-cancer treatment, red for those very unlikely to receive anti-cancer treatment and orange where the chance of accessing treatment is uncertain. Comprehensive supportive care can be individualised based on the group a particular patient is in.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Lung cancer outcomes are improving with the availability of increasingly efficacious treatments; however, treatment rates for advanced disease remain low. In this review, we discuss how person-centred outcomes could be improved, how outcomes can be prognosticated and how the 'host' can be staged as well as the cancer. Recent data suggests that early comprehensive supportive care improves quality of life, reduces time spent in hospital and may affect survival.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Comprehensive supportive care is likely to improve quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer. Further work is needed to see if it can improve treatment rates and survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":"18 3","pages":"154-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141876437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-08DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000709
Trude R Balstad, Marianne Bråtveit, Tora S Solheim, Lisa Heide Koteng, Asta Bye, Rasmus Dahl Jakobsen, Bente Schødt-Osmo, Siv Hilde Fjeldstad, Marianne Erichsen, Ola Magne Vagnildhaug, Ingvild Paur, Inger Ottestad
Purpose of review: Accurate assessment of dietary intake, especially energy and protein intake, is crucial for optimizing nutritional care and outcomes in patients with cancer. Validation of dietary assessment methods is necessary to ensure accuracy, but the validity of these methods in patients with cancer, and especially in those with cancer cachexia, is uncertain. Validating nutritional intake is complex because of the variety of dietary methods, lack of a gold standard method, and diverse validation measures. Here, we review the literature on validations of dietary intake methods in patients with cancer, including those with cachexia, and highlight the gap between current validation efforts and the need for accurate dietary assessment methods in this population.
Recent findings: We analyzed eight studies involving 1479 patients with cancer to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of 24-hour recalls, food records, and food frequency questionnaires in estimating energy and protein intake. We discuss validation methods, including comparison with biomarkers, indirect calorimetry, and relative validation of dietary intake methods.
Summary: Few have validated dietary intake methods against objective markers in patients with cancer. While food records and 24-hour recalls show potential accuracy for energy and protein intake, this may be compromised in hypermetabolic patients. Additionally, under- and overreporting of intake may be less frequent, and the reliability of urinary nitrogen as a protein intake marker in patients with cachexia needs further investigation. Accurate dietary assessment is important for enhancing nutritional care outcomes in cachexia trials, requiring validation at multiple time points throughout the cancer trajectory.
{"title":"Validity of dietary intake methods in cancer cachexia.","authors":"Trude R Balstad, Marianne Bråtveit, Tora S Solheim, Lisa Heide Koteng, Asta Bye, Rasmus Dahl Jakobsen, Bente Schødt-Osmo, Siv Hilde Fjeldstad, Marianne Erichsen, Ola Magne Vagnildhaug, Ingvild Paur, Inger Ottestad","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000709","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000709","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Accurate assessment of dietary intake, especially energy and protein intake, is crucial for optimizing nutritional care and outcomes in patients with cancer. Validation of dietary assessment methods is necessary to ensure accuracy, but the validity of these methods in patients with cancer, and especially in those with cancer cachexia, is uncertain. Validating nutritional intake is complex because of the variety of dietary methods, lack of a gold standard method, and diverse validation measures. Here, we review the literature on validations of dietary intake methods in patients with cancer, including those with cachexia, and highlight the gap between current validation efforts and the need for accurate dietary assessment methods in this population.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>We analyzed eight studies involving 1479 patients with cancer to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of 24-hour recalls, food records, and food frequency questionnaires in estimating energy and protein intake. We discuss validation methods, including comparison with biomarkers, indirect calorimetry, and relative validation of dietary intake methods.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Few have validated dietary intake methods against objective markers in patients with cancer. While food records and 24-hour recalls show potential accuracy for energy and protein intake, this may be compromised in hypermetabolic patients. Additionally, under- and overreporting of intake may be less frequent, and the reliability of urinary nitrogen as a protein intake marker in patients with cachexia needs further investigation. Accurate dietary assessment is important for enhancing nutritional care outcomes in cachexia trials, requiring validation at multiple time points throughout the cancer trajectory.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"145-153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141564884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-11DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000715
Johan Nyberg, Rikard Rosenbacke, Elinor Ben-Menachem
Purpose of review: Several innovative digital technologies have begun to be applied to diagnosing and treating migraine. We reviewed the potential benefits and opportunities from delivering migraine care through comprehensive digital clinics.
Recent findings: There are increasing applications of digitization to migraine diagnosis and management, including e-diaries, and patient self-management, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital care delivery appears to better engage chronic migraine sufferers who may struggle to present to physical clinics.
Summary: Digital clinics appear to be a promising treatment modality for patients with chronic migraine. They potentially minimize travel time, shorten waiting periods, improve usability, and increase access to neurologists. Additionally, they have the potential to provide care at a much lower cost than traditional physical clinics. However, the current state of evidence mostly draws on case-reports, suggesting a need for future randomized trials comparing digital interventions with standard care pathways.
{"title":"Digital clinics for diagnosing and treating migraine.","authors":"Johan Nyberg, Rikard Rosenbacke, Elinor Ben-Menachem","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000715","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000715","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Several innovative digital technologies have begun to be applied to diagnosing and treating migraine. We reviewed the potential benefits and opportunities from delivering migraine care through comprehensive digital clinics.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There are increasing applications of digitization to migraine diagnosis and management, including e-diaries, and patient self-management, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital care delivery appears to better engage chronic migraine sufferers who may struggle to present to physical clinics.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Digital clinics appear to be a promising treatment modality for patients with chronic migraine. They potentially minimize travel time, shorten waiting periods, improve usability, and increase access to neurologists. Additionally, they have the potential to provide care at a much lower cost than traditional physical clinics. However, the current state of evidence mostly draws on case-reports, suggesting a need for future randomized trials comparing digital interventions with standard care pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"107-112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141591800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-05-27DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000706
Taichi Goto, Leorey N Saligan
Purpose of review: This focused, narrative review mostly describes our team's investigations into the potential inflammatory mechanisms that contribute to the development of cancer-related gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis and its associated symptoms. This review summarizes details of our clinical and preclinical findings to test the role of inflammation in the development and occurrence of these cancer-related conditions.
Recent findings: GI mucositis (GIM) is a common, distressing condition reported by cancer patients. GIM is often clustered with other behaviors including fatigue, pain, anorexia, depression, and diarrhea. It is hypothesized that there is a common biologic mechanism underpinning this symptom cluster. Our multi-platform investigations revealed that GIM and its associated cluster of behaviors may be triggered by local inflammation spreading systemically causing pro-inflammatory-mediated toxicities, leading to alterations in immune, metabolic, and nervous system functions and activities. For example, behavioral toxicities related to local irradiation for non-metastatic cancer may be triggered by mGluR5 activation influencing prolonged T cell as well as NF-κB transcription factor activities. Thus, interventions targeting inflammation and associated pathways may be a reasonable strategy to alleviate GIM and its symptom cluster.
Summary: GIM may be a sign of a broader systemic inflammatory response triggered by cancer or its treatment. Addressing GIM and its associated symptoms primarily involves supportive care strategies focused on relieving symptoms, promoting healing, and preventing complications.
{"title":"Mechanistic insights into behavioral clusters associated with cancer-related systemic inflammatory response.","authors":"Taichi Goto, Leorey N Saligan","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000706","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000706","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This focused, narrative review mostly describes our team's investigations into the potential inflammatory mechanisms that contribute to the development of cancer-related gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis and its associated symptoms. This review summarizes details of our clinical and preclinical findings to test the role of inflammation in the development and occurrence of these cancer-related conditions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>GI mucositis (GIM) is a common, distressing condition reported by cancer patients. GIM is often clustered with other behaviors including fatigue, pain, anorexia, depression, and diarrhea. It is hypothesized that there is a common biologic mechanism underpinning this symptom cluster. Our multi-platform investigations revealed that GIM and its associated cluster of behaviors may be triggered by local inflammation spreading systemically causing pro-inflammatory-mediated toxicities, leading to alterations in immune, metabolic, and nervous system functions and activities. For example, behavioral toxicities related to local irradiation for non-metastatic cancer may be triggered by mGluR5 activation influencing prolonged T cell as well as NF-κB transcription factor activities. Thus, interventions targeting inflammation and associated pathways may be a reasonable strategy to alleviate GIM and its symptom cluster.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>GIM may be a sign of a broader systemic inflammatory response triggered by cancer or its treatment. Addressing GIM and its associated symptoms primarily involves supportive care strategies focused on relieving symptoms, promoting healing, and preventing complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"161-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141176417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000708
Aminah Jatoi, Barry Laird
{"title":"In support of rigor and reproducibility in cancer cachexia research.","authors":"Aminah Jatoi, Barry Laird","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000708","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000708","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":"18 3","pages":"118-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141876438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000714
Thomas J Craig, Paul Farquhar-Smith
Purpose of review: Mirogabalin is a novel gabapentinoid medication for the treatment of neuropathic pain. The purpose of this review is to discuss current evidence for its use. Gabapentinoids are widely prescribed for neuropathic pain. Mirogabalin offers theoretical advantages over traditional gabapentinoids due to its specificity for the α2δ-1 subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels. It is theorised that this specificity may reduce adverse drug reactions by minimising binding to the α2δ-2 subunit which is responsible for many of the gabapentinoid side effects.
Recent findings: Mirogabalin's slower dissociation from the α2δ-1 compared with α2δ-2, and its higher potency may also impart an efficacy benefit over traditional gabapentinoids. These theoretical advantages of mirogabalin remain inconclusive in clinical practice, with mixed evidence regarding mirogabalin versus traditional gabapentinoids. Some studies suggest a reduced side effect profile yet, others fail to demonstrate significant differences. Regarding efficacy, mirogabalin may be superior to placebo for several neuropathic pain syndromes, but evidence of widespread benefit over traditional gabapentinoids is currently lacking.
Summary: Mirogabalin offers theoretical promise, but large, independent studies are required to further assess its performance versus traditional gabapentinoids.
{"title":"Mirogabalin: a novel gabapentinoid or another false dawn?","authors":"Thomas J Craig, Paul Farquhar-Smith","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000714","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000714","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Mirogabalin is a novel gabapentinoid medication for the treatment of neuropathic pain. The purpose of this review is to discuss current evidence for its use. Gabapentinoids are widely prescribed for neuropathic pain. Mirogabalin offers theoretical advantages over traditional gabapentinoids due to its specificity for the α2δ-1 subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels. It is theorised that this specificity may reduce adverse drug reactions by minimising binding to the α2δ-2 subunit which is responsible for many of the gabapentinoid side effects.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Mirogabalin's slower dissociation from the α2δ-1 compared with α2δ-2, and its higher potency may also impart an efficacy benefit over traditional gabapentinoids. These theoretical advantages of mirogabalin remain inconclusive in clinical practice, with mixed evidence regarding mirogabalin versus traditional gabapentinoids. Some studies suggest a reduced side effect profile yet, others fail to demonstrate significant differences. Regarding efficacy, mirogabalin may be superior to placebo for several neuropathic pain syndromes, but evidence of widespread benefit over traditional gabapentinoids is currently lacking.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Mirogabalin offers theoretical promise, but large, independent studies are required to further assess its performance versus traditional gabapentinoids.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":"18 3","pages":"113-117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141876439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-04-30DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000704
Andrea Stringer
{"title":"The systemic outcomes of gastrointestinal mucositis: host-microbe interaction leading to systemic inflammatory responses.","authors":"Andrea Stringer","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000704","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000704","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":"18 2","pages":"71-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140960481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2024-12-22DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000690
Amara Naseer, Fiona Goode, Tia Doyle
Purpose of review: Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a devasting complication of radiation therapy (RT), especially in head and neck cancers (HNC), and is still poorly understood. The aim of this review is to report its incidence and consider the risk factors associated with ORN to highlight prevention strategies to decrease its incidence.
Recent findings: The average incidence of ORN is between 2% and 23%, with incidence decreasing in more recent years with the introduction of modern RT technology and better oral health care. Smoking, diabetes mellitus, oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancers, pre- and post-RT dental extractions and a total radiation dose of over 60 Gy were all identified as risk factors for ORN. In prevention, strategies were mainly structured around minimising risk factors or targeting possible mechanisms of ORN's pathophysiology.
Summary: At present, the controversy surrounding the risk factors and pathogenesis of ORN makes it difficult to establish a set of prevention guidelines for its incidence. In order to achieve this, more research examining its aetiology must be conducted as well as a universal staging system within which ORN may be classified.
{"title":"Osteoradionecrosis - an old problem with new consequences.","authors":"Amara Naseer, Fiona Goode, Tia Doyle","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000690","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000690","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a devasting complication of radiation therapy (RT), especially in head and neck cancers (HNC), and is still poorly understood. The aim of this review is to report its incidence and consider the risk factors associated with ORN to highlight prevention strategies to decrease its incidence.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The average incidence of ORN is between 2% and 23%, with incidence decreasing in more recent years with the introduction of modern RT technology and better oral health care. Smoking, diabetes mellitus, oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancers, pre- and post-RT dental extractions and a total radiation dose of over 60 Gy were all identified as risk factors for ORN. In prevention, strategies were mainly structured around minimising risk factors or targeting possible mechanisms of ORN's pathophysiology.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>At present, the controversy surrounding the risk factors and pathogenesis of ORN makes it difficult to establish a set of prevention guidelines for its incidence. In order to achieve this, more research examining its aetiology must be conducted as well as a universal staging system within which ORN may be classified.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139089132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2024-12-27DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000686
Emily Keit, Ronica Nanda, Peter A S Johnstone
Purpose of review: Thirty-day mortality (30DM) is an emerging consideration for determining whether terminally ill adult patients may benefit from palliative radiotherapy (RT). However, the efficacy and ethics of delivering palliative RT at the end of life (EOL) in children are seldom discussed and not well-established.
Recent findings: Palliative RT is perhaps underutilized among patients ≤21 years old with rates as low as 11%. While effective when delivered early, clinical benefit decreases when administered within the last 30 days of life. Pediatric 30DM rates vary widely between institutions (0.7-30%), highlighting the need for standardized practices. Accurate prognosis estimation remains challenging and prognostic models specific to palliative pediatric patients are limited. Discordance between provider and patient/parent perceptions of prognosis further complicates decision-making.
Summary: RT offers effective symptom control in pediatric patients when administered early. However, delivering RT within the last 30 days of life may provide limited clinical benefit and hinder optimal EOL planning and care. Early referral for palliative RT, preferably with fewer fractions (five or fewer), along with multidisciplinary supportive care, optimizes the likelihood of maintaining patients' quality of life. Prognosis estimation remains difficult, and improving patient and family understanding is crucial. Further research is needed to refine prognostic models and enhance patient-centered care.
{"title":"Thirty-day mortality as a metric for palliative radiotherapy in pediatric patients.","authors":"Emily Keit, Ronica Nanda, Peter A S Johnstone","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000686","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000686","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Thirty-day mortality (30DM) is an emerging consideration for determining whether terminally ill adult patients may benefit from palliative radiotherapy (RT). However, the efficacy and ethics of delivering palliative RT at the end of life (EOL) in children are seldom discussed and not well-established.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Palliative RT is perhaps underutilized among patients ≤21 years old with rates as low as 11%. While effective when delivered early, clinical benefit decreases when administered within the last 30 days of life. Pediatric 30DM rates vary widely between institutions (0.7-30%), highlighting the need for standardized practices. Accurate prognosis estimation remains challenging and prognostic models specific to palliative pediatric patients are limited. Discordance between provider and patient/parent perceptions of prognosis further complicates decision-making.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>RT offers effective symptom control in pediatric patients when administered early. However, delivering RT within the last 30 days of life may provide limited clinical benefit and hinder optimal EOL planning and care. Early referral for palliative RT, preferably with fewer fractions (five or fewer), along with multidisciplinary supportive care, optimizes the likelihood of maintaining patients' quality of life. Prognosis estimation remains difficult, and improving patient and family understanding is crucial. Further research is needed to refine prognostic models and enhance patient-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"65-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139089133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}