首页 > 最新文献

World Journal of Emergency Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Accuracy of diagnostic tests in cardiac injury after blunt chest trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 钝性胸外伤后心脏损伤诊断试验的准确性:系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2023-05-27 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00504-9
Ioannis Panagiotis Kyriazidis, Dominik A Jakob, Juliana Alexandra Hernández Vargas, Oscar H Franco, Elias Degiannis, Patrick Dorn, Sjaak Pouwels, Bijendra Patel, Ian Johnson, Christopher John Houdlen, Graham S Whiteley, Marion Head, Anil Lala, Haroon Mumtaz, J Agustin Soler, Katie Mellor, David Rawaf, Ahmed R Ahmed, Suhaib J S Ahmad, Aristomenis Exadaktylos

Introduction: The diagnosis of cardiac contusion, caused by blunt chest trauma, remains a challenge due to the non-specific symptoms it causes and the lack of ideal tests to diagnose myocardial damage. A cardiac contusion can be life-threatening if not diagnosed and treated promptly. Several diagnostic tests have been used to evaluate the risk of cardiac complications, but the challenge of identifying patients with contusions nevertheless remains.

Aim of the study: To evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic tests for detecting blunt cardiac injury (BCI) and its complications, in patients with severe chest injuries, who are assessed in an emergency department or by any front-line emergency physician.

Methods: A targeted search strategy was performed using Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases from 1993 up to October 2022. Data on at least one of the following diagnostic tests: electrocardiogram (ECG), serum creatinine phosphokinase-MB level (CPK-MB), echocardiography (Echo), Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) or Cardiac troponin T (cTnT). Diagnostic tests for cardiac contusion were evaluated for their accuracy in meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 and the QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess bias of the studies.

Results: This systematic review yielded 51 studies (n = 5,359). The weighted mean incidence of myocardial injuries after sustaining a blunt force trauma stood at 18.3% of cases. Overall weighted mean mortality among patients with blunt cardiac injury was 7.6% (1.4-36.4%). Initial ECG, cTnI, cTnT and transthoracic echocardiography TTE all showed high specificity (> 80%), but lower sensitivity (< 70%). TEE had a specificity of 72.1% (range 35.8-98.2%) and sensitivity of 86.7% (range 40-99.2%) in diagnosing cardiac contusion. CK-MB had the lowest diagnostic odds ratio of 3.598 (95% CI: 1.832-7.068). Normal ECG accompanied by normal cTnI showed a high sensitivity of 85% in ruling out cardiac injuries.

Conclusion: Emergency physicians face great challenges in diagnosing cardiac injuries in patients following blunt trauma. In the majority of cases, joint use of ECG and cTnI was a pragmatic and cost-effective approach to rule out cardiac injuries. In addition, TEE may be highly accurate in identifying cardiac injuries in suspected cases.

钝性胸部外伤引起的心挫伤的诊断仍然是一个挑战,因为它引起的非特异性症状和缺乏理想的检测来诊断心肌损伤。如果不及时诊断和治疗,心脏挫伤可能危及生命。一些诊断测试已被用于评估心脏并发症的风险,但识别挫伤患者的挑战仍然存在。研究目的:评估在急诊科或任何一线急诊医生评估的严重胸部损伤患者中,检测钝性心脏损伤(BCI)及其并发症的诊断试验的准确性。方法:采用Ovid MEDLINE和Embase数据库,从1993年至2022年10月进行针对性检索。至少一项以下诊断检查的数据:心电图(ECG)、血清肌酸酐磷酸激酶- mb水平(CPK-MB)、超声心动图(Echo)、心肌肌钙蛋白I (cTnI)或心肌肌钙蛋白T (cTnT)。在荟萃分析中评估心挫伤诊断试验的准确性。使用I2评估异质性,并使用QUADAS-2工具评估研究的偏倚。结果:本系统综述共纳入51项研究(n = 5359)。钝器外伤后心肌损伤的加权平均发生率为18.3%。钝性心脏损伤患者的总体加权平均死亡率为7.6%(1.4-36.4%)。初步心电图、cTnI、cTnT和经胸超声心动图TTE均显示高特异性(> 80%),但敏感性较低(结论:急诊医师对钝性创伤后心脏损伤的诊断面临很大挑战)。在大多数情况下,联合使用ECG和cTnI是一种实用且经济有效的方法来排除心脏损伤。此外,TEE在识别疑似病例的心脏损伤方面可能非常准确。
{"title":"Accuracy of diagnostic tests in cardiac injury after blunt chest trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ioannis Panagiotis Kyriazidis,&nbsp;Dominik A Jakob,&nbsp;Juliana Alexandra Hernández Vargas,&nbsp;Oscar H Franco,&nbsp;Elias Degiannis,&nbsp;Patrick Dorn,&nbsp;Sjaak Pouwels,&nbsp;Bijendra Patel,&nbsp;Ian Johnson,&nbsp;Christopher John Houdlen,&nbsp;Graham S Whiteley,&nbsp;Marion Head,&nbsp;Anil Lala,&nbsp;Haroon Mumtaz,&nbsp;J Agustin Soler,&nbsp;Katie Mellor,&nbsp;David Rawaf,&nbsp;Ahmed R Ahmed,&nbsp;Suhaib J S Ahmad,&nbsp;Aristomenis Exadaktylos","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00504-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00504-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diagnosis of cardiac contusion, caused by blunt chest trauma, remains a challenge due to the non-specific symptoms it causes and the lack of ideal tests to diagnose myocardial damage. A cardiac contusion can be life-threatening if not diagnosed and treated promptly. Several diagnostic tests have been used to evaluate the risk of cardiac complications, but the challenge of identifying patients with contusions nevertheless remains.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic tests for detecting blunt cardiac injury (BCI) and its complications, in patients with severe chest injuries, who are assessed in an emergency department or by any front-line emergency physician.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A targeted search strategy was performed using Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases from 1993 up to October 2022. Data on at least one of the following diagnostic tests: electrocardiogram (ECG), serum creatinine phosphokinase-MB level (CPK-MB), echocardiography (Echo), Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) or Cardiac troponin T (cTnT). Diagnostic tests for cardiac contusion were evaluated for their accuracy in meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> and the QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess bias of the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This systematic review yielded 51 studies (n = 5,359). The weighted mean incidence of myocardial injuries after sustaining a blunt force trauma stood at 18.3% of cases. Overall weighted mean mortality among patients with blunt cardiac injury was 7.6% (1.4-36.4%). Initial ECG, cTnI, cTnT and transthoracic echocardiography TTE all showed high specificity (> 80%), but lower sensitivity (< 70%). TEE had a specificity of 72.1% (range 35.8-98.2%) and sensitivity of 86.7% (range 40-99.2%) in diagnosing cardiac contusion. CK-MB had the lowest diagnostic odds ratio of 3.598 (95% CI: 1.832-7.068). Normal ECG accompanied by normal cTnI showed a high sensitivity of 85% in ruling out cardiac injuries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Emergency physicians face great challenges in diagnosing cardiac injuries in patients following blunt trauma. In the majority of cases, joint use of ECG and cTnI was a pragmatic and cost-effective approach to rule out cardiac injuries. In addition, TEE may be highly accurate in identifying cardiac injuries in suspected cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225099/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9678209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Complex duodenal fistulae: a surgical nightmare. 复杂十二指肠瘘管:手术噩梦。
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2023-05-19 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00503-w
Ari Leppäniemi, Matti Tolonen, Panu Mentula

Introduction: A common feature of external duodenal fistulae is the devastating effect of the duodenal content rich in bile and pancreatic juice on nearby tissues with therapy-resistant local and systemic complications. This study analyzes the results of different management options with emphasis on successful fistula closure rates.

Methods: A retrospective single academic center study of adult patients treated for complex duodenal fistulas over a 17-year period with descriptive and univariate analyses was performed.

Results: Fifty patients were identified. First line treatment was surgical in 38 (76%) cases and consisted of resuture or resection with anastomosis combined with duodenal decompression and periduodenal drainage in 36 cases, rectus muscle patch, and surgical decompression with T-tube in one each. Fistula closure rate was 29/38 (76%). In 12 cases, the initial management was nonoperative with or without percutaneous drainage. The fistula was closed without surgery in 5/6 patients (1 patient died with persistent fistula). Among the remaining 6 patients eventually operated, fistula closure was achieved in 4 cases. There was no difference in successful fistula closure rates among initially operatively versus nonoperatively managed patients (29/38 vs. 9/12, p = 1.000). However, when considering eventually failed nonoperative management in 7/12 patients, there was a significant difference in the fistula closure rate (29/38 vs. 5/12, p = 0.036). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 20/50 (40%).

Conclusions: Surgical closure combined with duodenal decompression in complex duodenal leaks offers the best chance of successful outcome. In selected cases, nonoperative management can be tried, accepting that some patients may require surgery later.

导言:十二指肠外瘘的一个共同特征是富含胆汁和胰液的十二指肠内容物对附近组织的破坏性影响,并伴有治疗抵抗性的局部和全身并发症。本研究分析了不同治疗方案的结果,重点是成功的瘘管闭合率。方法:对17年来治疗复杂十二指肠瘘的成人患者进行回顾性研究,并进行描述性和单变量分析。结果:共发现50例患者。一线治疗38例(76%)为手术治疗,36例为再缝合或吻合切除联合十二指肠减压和十二指肠周围引流,1例为直肌贴片,1例为t管手术减压。瘘管闭合率为29/38(76%)。在12例中,最初的治疗方法是非手术,有或没有经皮引流。6例患者中有5例未手术关闭瘘管(1例因瘘管持续存在而死亡)。其余6例患者最终手术,其中4例瘘口闭合。初始手术与非手术治疗患者的瘘管闭合成功率无差异(29/38 vs. 9/12, p = 1.000)。然而,当考虑到7/12患者最终失败的非手术治疗时,瘘管关闭率有显著差异(29/38 vs. 5/12, p = 0.036)。住院总死亡率为20/50(40%)。结论:手术封闭联合十二指肠减压治疗复杂的十二指肠渗漏是获得成功的最佳机会。在选定的病例中,可以尝试非手术治疗,接受一些患者可能需要手术治疗。
{"title":"Complex duodenal fistulae: a surgical nightmare.","authors":"Ari Leppäniemi,&nbsp;Matti Tolonen,&nbsp;Panu Mentula","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00503-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00503-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A common feature of external duodenal fistulae is the devastating effect of the duodenal content rich in bile and pancreatic juice on nearby tissues with therapy-resistant local and systemic complications. This study analyzes the results of different management options with emphasis on successful fistula closure rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single academic center study of adult patients treated for complex duodenal fistulas over a 17-year period with descriptive and univariate analyses was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients were identified. First line treatment was surgical in 38 (76%) cases and consisted of resuture or resection with anastomosis combined with duodenal decompression and periduodenal drainage in 36 cases, rectus muscle patch, and surgical decompression with T-tube in one each. Fistula closure rate was 29/38 (76%). In 12 cases, the initial management was nonoperative with or without percutaneous drainage. The fistula was closed without surgery in 5/6 patients (1 patient died with persistent fistula). Among the remaining 6 patients eventually operated, fistula closure was achieved in 4 cases. There was no difference in successful fistula closure rates among initially operatively versus nonoperatively managed patients (29/38 vs. 9/12, p = 1.000). However, when considering eventually failed nonoperative management in 7/12 patients, there was a significant difference in the fistula closure rate (29/38 vs. 5/12, p = 0.036). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 20/50 (40%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical closure combined with duodenal decompression in complex duodenal leaks offers the best chance of successful outcome. In selected cases, nonoperative management can be tried, accepting that some patients may require surgery later.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199491/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9679619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
WSES consensus guidelines on sigmoid volvulus management. 乙状结肠扭转治疗的WSES共识指南。
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00502-x
Brian W C A Tian, Gabriele Vigutto, Edward Tan, Harry van Goor, Cino Bendinelli, Fikri Abu-Zidan, Rao Ivatury, Boris Sakakushev, Isidoro Di Carlo, Gabriele Sganga, Ronald V Maier, Raul Coimbra, Ari Leppäniemi, Andrey Litvin, Dimitrios Damaskos, Richard Ten Broek, Walter Biffl, Salomone Di Saverio, Belinda De Simone, Marco Ceresoli, Edoardo Picetti, Joseph Galante, Giovanni D Tebala, Solomon Gurmu Beka, Luigi Bonavina, Yunfeng Cui, Jim Khan, Enrico Cicuttin, Francesco Amico, Inaba Kenji, Andreas Hecker, Luca Ansaloni, Massimo Sartelli, Ernest E Moore, Yoram Kluger, Mario Testini, Dieter Weber, Vanni Agnoletti, Nicola De' Angelis, Federico Coccolini, Ibrahima Sall, Fausto Catena

Sigmoid volvulus is a common surgical emergency, especially in elderly patients. Patients can present with a wide range of clinical states: from asymptomatic, to frank peritonitis secondary to colonic perforation. These patients generally need urgent treatment, be it endoscopic decompression of the colon or an upfront colectomy. The World Society of Emergency Surgery united a worldwide group of international experts to review the current evidence and propose a consensus guidelines on the management of sigmoid volvulus.

乙状结肠扭转是一种常见的外科急症,尤其是在老年患者中。患者可以表现出广泛的临床状态:从无症状到继发于结肠穿孔的明显腹膜炎。这些患者通常需要紧急治疗,无论是内镜下结肠减压还是预先结肠切除术。世界急诊外科学会联合了一个世界范围内的国际专家小组,审查了目前的证据,并就乙状结肠扭转的治疗提出了共识指南。
{"title":"WSES consensus guidelines on sigmoid volvulus management.","authors":"Brian W C A Tian,&nbsp;Gabriele Vigutto,&nbsp;Edward Tan,&nbsp;Harry van Goor,&nbsp;Cino Bendinelli,&nbsp;Fikri Abu-Zidan,&nbsp;Rao Ivatury,&nbsp;Boris Sakakushev,&nbsp;Isidoro Di Carlo,&nbsp;Gabriele Sganga,&nbsp;Ronald V Maier,&nbsp;Raul Coimbra,&nbsp;Ari Leppäniemi,&nbsp;Andrey Litvin,&nbsp;Dimitrios Damaskos,&nbsp;Richard Ten Broek,&nbsp;Walter Biffl,&nbsp;Salomone Di Saverio,&nbsp;Belinda De Simone,&nbsp;Marco Ceresoli,&nbsp;Edoardo Picetti,&nbsp;Joseph Galante,&nbsp;Giovanni D Tebala,&nbsp;Solomon Gurmu Beka,&nbsp;Luigi Bonavina,&nbsp;Yunfeng Cui,&nbsp;Jim Khan,&nbsp;Enrico Cicuttin,&nbsp;Francesco Amico,&nbsp;Inaba Kenji,&nbsp;Andreas Hecker,&nbsp;Luca Ansaloni,&nbsp;Massimo Sartelli,&nbsp;Ernest E Moore,&nbsp;Yoram Kluger,&nbsp;Mario Testini,&nbsp;Dieter Weber,&nbsp;Vanni Agnoletti,&nbsp;Nicola De' Angelis,&nbsp;Federico Coccolini,&nbsp;Ibrahima Sall,&nbsp;Fausto Catena","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00502-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00502-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sigmoid volvulus is a common surgical emergency, especially in elderly patients. Patients can present with a wide range of clinical states: from asymptomatic, to frank peritonitis secondary to colonic perforation. These patients generally need urgent treatment, be it endoscopic decompression of the colon or an upfront colectomy. The World Society of Emergency Surgery united a worldwide group of international experts to review the current evidence and propose a consensus guidelines on the management of sigmoid volvulus.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186802/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9679609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
The unrestricted global effort to complete the COOL trial. 完成COOL试验的无限制全球努力。
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2023-05-11 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00500-z
Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Federico Coccolini, Matti Tolonen, Samuel Minor, Fausto Catena, Emanuel Gois, Christopher J Doig, Michael D Hill, Luca Ansaloni, Massimo Chiarugi, Dario Tartaglia, Orestis Ioannidis, Michael Sugrue, Elif Colak, S Morad Hameed, Hanna Lampela, Vanni Agnoletti, Jessica L McKee, Naisan Garraway, Massimo Sartelli, Chad G Ball, Neil G Parry, Kelly Voght, Lisa Julien, Jenna Kroeker, Derek J Roberts, Peter Faris, Corina Tiruta, Ernest E Moore, Lee Anne Ammons, Elissavet Anestiadou, Cino Bendinelli, Konstantinos Bouliaris, Rosemarry Carroll, Marco Ceresoli, Francesco Favi, Angela Gurrado, Joao Rezende-Neto, Arda Isik, Camilla Cremonini, Silivia Strambi, Georgios Koukoulis, Mario Testini, Sandy Trpcic, Alessandro Pasculli, Erika Picariello, Fikri Abu-Zidan, Ademola Adeyeye, Goran Augustin, Felipe Alconchel, Yuksel Altinel, Luz Adriana Hernandez Amin, José Manuel Aranda-Narváez, Oussama Baraket, Walter L Biffl, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Luigi Bonavina, Giuseppe Brisinda, Luca Cardinali, Andrea Celotti, Mohamed Chaouch, Maria Chiarello, Gianluca Costa, Nicola de'Angelis, Nicolo De Manzini, Samir Delibegovic, Salomone Di Saverio, Belinda De Simone, Vincent Dubuisson, Pietro Fransvea, Gianluca Garulli, Alessio Giordano, Carlos Gomes, Firdaus Hayati, Jinjian Huang, Aini Fahriza Ibrahim, Tan Jih Huei, Ruhi Fadzlyana Jailani, Mansoor Khan, Alfonso Palmieri Luna, Manu L N G Malbrain, Sanjay Marwah, Paul McBeth, Andrei Mihailescu, Alessia Morello, Francesk Mulita, Valentina Murzi, Ahmad Tarmizi Mohammad, Simran Parmar, Ajay Pak, Michael Pak-Kai Wong, Desire Pantalone, Mauro Podda, Caterina Puccioni, Kemal Rasa, Jianan Ren, Francesco Roscio, Antonio Gonzalez-Sanchez, Gabriele Sganga, Maximilian Scheiterle, Mihail Slavchev, Dmitry Smirnov, Lorenzo Tosi, Anand Trivedi, Jaime Andres Gonzalez Vega, Maciej Waledziak, Sofia Xenaki, Desmond Winter, Xiuwen Wu, Andee Dzulkarnean Zakaria, Zaidi Zakaria
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) has an increasing incidence with mortality rates over 80% in some settings. Mortality typically results from disruption of the gastrointestinal tract, progressive and self-perpetuating bio-mediator generation, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ failure. A further therapeutic option may be open abdomen (OA) management with negative peritoneal pressure therapy (NPPT) to remove inflammatory ascites and attenuate the systemic damage from SCIAS, although there are definite risks of leaving the abdomen open whenever it might possibly be closed. This potential therapeutic paradigm is the rationale being assessed in the Closed Or Open after Laparotomy (COOL trial) ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095 ). Initially, the COOL trial received Industry sponsorship; however, this funding mandated the use of a specific trademarked and expensive NPPT device in half of the patients allocated to the intervention (open) arm. In August 2022, the 3 M/Acelity Corporation without consultation but within the terms of the contract canceled the financial support of the trial. Although creating financial difficulty, there is now no restriction on specific NPPT devices and removing a cost-prohibitive intervention creates an opportunity to expand the COOL trial to a truly global basis. This document describes the evolution of the COOL trial, with a focus on future opportunities for global growth of the study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The COOL trial is the largest prospective randomized controlled trial examining the random allocation of SCIAS patients intra-operatively to either formal closure of the fascia or the use of the OA with an application of an NPPT dressing. Patients are eligible if they have free uncontained intraperitoneal contamination and physiologic derangements exemplified by septic shock OR severely adverse predicted clinical outcomes. The primary outcome is intended to definitively inform global practice by conclusively evaluating 90-day survival. Initial recruitment has been lower than hoped but satisfactory, and the COOL steering committee and trial investigators intend with increased global support to continue enrollment until recruitment ensures a definitive answer.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>OA is mandated in many cases of SCIAS such as the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome associated with closure, or a planned second look as for example part of "damage control"; however, improved source control (locally and systemically) is the most uncertain indication for an OA. The COOL trial seeks to expand potential sites and proceed with the evaluation of NPPT agnostic to device, to properly examine the hypothesis that this treatment attenuates systemic damage and improves survival. This approach will not affect internal validity and should improve the external validity of any observed results of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Trial registrat
背景:严重并发症腹腔内脓毒症(SCIAS)的发病率不断上升,在某些情况下死亡率超过80%。死亡通常由胃肠道破坏、进行性和自我延续的生物介质产生、全身性炎症和多器官衰竭引起。另一种治疗选择可能是采用腹腔负压疗法(NPPT)进行开腹(OA)治疗,以消除炎症性腹水并减轻SCIAS的全身损伤,尽管在可能关闭的情况下保持腹部开放存在一定的风险。这种潜在的治疗模式是在剖腹手术后闭合或打开(COOL试验)中评估的基本原理(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095)。最初,COOL试验获得了行业赞助;然而,这笔资金要求在分配到干预(开放)组的一半患者中使用特定的商标和昂贵的NPPT设备。2022年8月,3m /Acelity公司未经协商,但在合同条款内取消了对试验的财政支持。虽然造成了财政困难,但现在对特定的NPPT设备没有限制,并且取消了成本高昂的干预措施,这为将COOL试验扩大到真正的全球基础创造了机会。本文件描述了COOL试验的发展,重点是该研究在全球发展的未来机会。方法:COOL试验是最大的前瞻性随机对照试验,检查术中随机分配SCIAS患者进行正式关闭筋膜或使用OA并应用NPPT敷料。如果患者有游离的不受控制的腹腔污染和生理紊乱,例如感染性休克或严重不良的预测临床结果,则符合条件。主要结果旨在通过最终评估90天生存率来明确告知全球实践。最初的招募人数低于预期,但令人满意,COOL指导委员会和试验研究人员打算在全球范围内获得更多支持,继续招募,直到招募确保了明确的答案。讨论:OA在许多SCIAS病例中是强制性的,例如与闭合相关的腹部隔室综合征的风险,或计划的第二次检查,例如“损害控制”的一部分;然而,改进的源代码控制(局部的和系统的)是OA最不确定的指示。COOL试验旨在扩大潜在的部位,并继续评估与设备无关的NPPT,以适当地检验这种治疗减轻全身损伤和提高生存率的假设。这种方法不会影响内部效度,并应提高干预的任何观察结果的外部效度。试验注册:美国国立卫生研究院(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095)。
{"title":"The unrestricted global effort to complete the COOL trial.","authors":"Andrew W Kirkpatrick,&nbsp;Federico Coccolini,&nbsp;Matti Tolonen,&nbsp;Samuel Minor,&nbsp;Fausto Catena,&nbsp;Emanuel Gois,&nbsp;Christopher J Doig,&nbsp;Michael D Hill,&nbsp;Luca Ansaloni,&nbsp;Massimo Chiarugi,&nbsp;Dario Tartaglia,&nbsp;Orestis Ioannidis,&nbsp;Michael Sugrue,&nbsp;Elif Colak,&nbsp;S Morad Hameed,&nbsp;Hanna Lampela,&nbsp;Vanni Agnoletti,&nbsp;Jessica L McKee,&nbsp;Naisan Garraway,&nbsp;Massimo Sartelli,&nbsp;Chad G Ball,&nbsp;Neil G Parry,&nbsp;Kelly Voght,&nbsp;Lisa Julien,&nbsp;Jenna Kroeker,&nbsp;Derek J Roberts,&nbsp;Peter Faris,&nbsp;Corina Tiruta,&nbsp;Ernest E Moore,&nbsp;Lee Anne Ammons,&nbsp;Elissavet Anestiadou,&nbsp;Cino Bendinelli,&nbsp;Konstantinos Bouliaris,&nbsp;Rosemarry Carroll,&nbsp;Marco Ceresoli,&nbsp;Francesco Favi,&nbsp;Angela Gurrado,&nbsp;Joao Rezende-Neto,&nbsp;Arda Isik,&nbsp;Camilla Cremonini,&nbsp;Silivia Strambi,&nbsp;Georgios Koukoulis,&nbsp;Mario Testini,&nbsp;Sandy Trpcic,&nbsp;Alessandro Pasculli,&nbsp;Erika Picariello,&nbsp;Fikri Abu-Zidan,&nbsp;Ademola Adeyeye,&nbsp;Goran Augustin,&nbsp;Felipe Alconchel,&nbsp;Yuksel Altinel,&nbsp;Luz Adriana Hernandez Amin,&nbsp;José Manuel Aranda-Narváez,&nbsp;Oussama Baraket,&nbsp;Walter L Biffl,&nbsp;Gian Luca Baiocchi,&nbsp;Luigi Bonavina,&nbsp;Giuseppe Brisinda,&nbsp;Luca Cardinali,&nbsp;Andrea Celotti,&nbsp;Mohamed Chaouch,&nbsp;Maria Chiarello,&nbsp;Gianluca Costa,&nbsp;Nicola de'Angelis,&nbsp;Nicolo De Manzini,&nbsp;Samir Delibegovic,&nbsp;Salomone Di Saverio,&nbsp;Belinda De Simone,&nbsp;Vincent Dubuisson,&nbsp;Pietro Fransvea,&nbsp;Gianluca Garulli,&nbsp;Alessio Giordano,&nbsp;Carlos Gomes,&nbsp;Firdaus Hayati,&nbsp;Jinjian Huang,&nbsp;Aini Fahriza Ibrahim,&nbsp;Tan Jih Huei,&nbsp;Ruhi Fadzlyana Jailani,&nbsp;Mansoor Khan,&nbsp;Alfonso Palmieri Luna,&nbsp;Manu L N G Malbrain,&nbsp;Sanjay Marwah,&nbsp;Paul McBeth,&nbsp;Andrei Mihailescu,&nbsp;Alessia Morello,&nbsp;Francesk Mulita,&nbsp;Valentina Murzi,&nbsp;Ahmad Tarmizi Mohammad,&nbsp;Simran Parmar,&nbsp;Ajay Pak,&nbsp;Michael Pak-Kai Wong,&nbsp;Desire Pantalone,&nbsp;Mauro Podda,&nbsp;Caterina Puccioni,&nbsp;Kemal Rasa,&nbsp;Jianan Ren,&nbsp;Francesco Roscio,&nbsp;Antonio Gonzalez-Sanchez,&nbsp;Gabriele Sganga,&nbsp;Maximilian Scheiterle,&nbsp;Mihail Slavchev,&nbsp;Dmitry Smirnov,&nbsp;Lorenzo Tosi,&nbsp;Anand Trivedi,&nbsp;Jaime Andres Gonzalez Vega,&nbsp;Maciej Waledziak,&nbsp;Sofia Xenaki,&nbsp;Desmond Winter,&nbsp;Xiuwen Wu,&nbsp;Andee Dzulkarnean Zakaria,&nbsp;Zaidi Zakaria","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00500-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00500-z","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) has an increasing incidence with mortality rates over 80% in some settings. Mortality typically results from disruption of the gastrointestinal tract, progressive and self-perpetuating bio-mediator generation, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ failure. A further therapeutic option may be open abdomen (OA) management with negative peritoneal pressure therapy (NPPT) to remove inflammatory ascites and attenuate the systemic damage from SCIAS, although there are definite risks of leaving the abdomen open whenever it might possibly be closed. This potential therapeutic paradigm is the rationale being assessed in the Closed Or Open after Laparotomy (COOL trial) ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095 ). Initially, the COOL trial received Industry sponsorship; however, this funding mandated the use of a specific trademarked and expensive NPPT device in half of the patients allocated to the intervention (open) arm. In August 2022, the 3 M/Acelity Corporation without consultation but within the terms of the contract canceled the financial support of the trial. Although creating financial difficulty, there is now no restriction on specific NPPT devices and removing a cost-prohibitive intervention creates an opportunity to expand the COOL trial to a truly global basis. This document describes the evolution of the COOL trial, with a focus on future opportunities for global growth of the study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The COOL trial is the largest prospective randomized controlled trial examining the random allocation of SCIAS patients intra-operatively to either formal closure of the fascia or the use of the OA with an application of an NPPT dressing. Patients are eligible if they have free uncontained intraperitoneal contamination and physiologic derangements exemplified by septic shock OR severely adverse predicted clinical outcomes. The primary outcome is intended to definitively inform global practice by conclusively evaluating 90-day survival. Initial recruitment has been lower than hoped but satisfactory, and the COOL steering committee and trial investigators intend with increased global support to continue enrollment until recruitment ensures a definitive answer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Discussion: &lt;/strong&gt;OA is mandated in many cases of SCIAS such as the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome associated with closure, or a planned second look as for example part of \"damage control\"; however, improved source control (locally and systemically) is the most uncertain indication for an OA. The COOL trial seeks to expand potential sites and proceed with the evaluation of NPPT agnostic to device, to properly examine the hypothesis that this treatment attenuates systemic damage and improves survival. This approach will not affect internal validity and should improve the external validity of any observed results of the intervention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Trial registrat","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173926/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9680455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Trauma deaths of hospitalized patients in Abu Dhabi Emirate: a retrospective descriptive study. 阿布扎比酋长国住院病人创伤死亡:一项回顾性描述性研究。
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00501-y
David O Alao, Arif Alper Cevik, Fikri M Abu-Zidan

Aim: To study the epidemiology and pattern of trauma-related deaths of hospitalized patients in Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates, in order to improve trauma management and injury prevention.

Methods: The Abu Dhabi Trauma Registry prospectively collects data of all hospitalized trauma patients from seven major trauma centres in Abu Dhabi Emirate. We studied all patients who died on arrival or after admission to these hospitals from January 2014 to December 2019.

Results: There were 453 deaths constituting 13.5% of all trauma deaths in the Abu Dhabi Emirate. The median (IQR) age of the patients was 33 (25-45) years, and 82% were males. 85% of the deaths occurred in the emergency department (ED) and the intensive care unit (ICU). Motor vehicle collision (63.8%) was the leading cause of death. 45.5% of the patients had head injury. Two of the seven hospitals admitted around 50% of all patients but accounted for only 25.8% of the total deaths (p < 0.001). Those who died in the ward (7%) were significantly older, median (IQR) age: of 65.5 (31.75-82.25) years, (p < 0.001), 34.4% of them were females (p = 0.09). The median (IQR) GCS of those who died in the ward was 15 (5.75-15) compared with 3 (3-3) for those who died in ED and ICU (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Death from trauma predominantly affects young males with motor traffic collision as the leading cause. Over 85% of in-hospital deaths occur in the ICU and ED, mainly from head injuries. Injury prevention of traffic collisions through enforcement of law and improved hospital care in the ED and ICU will reduce trauma death.

目的:了解阿拉伯联合酋长国阿布扎比酋长国住院患者创伤相关死亡的流行病学和模式,以提高创伤管理和损伤预防水平。方法:阿布扎比创伤登记处前瞻性地收集了阿布扎比酋长国七个主要创伤中心的所有住院创伤患者的数据。我们研究了2014年1月至2019年12月期间抵达这些医院时或入院后死亡的所有患者。结果:阿布扎比酋长国有453例死亡,占所有创伤死亡的13.5%。患者的中位(IQR)年龄为33岁(25-45岁),82%为男性。85%的死亡发生在急诊科(ED)和重症监护病房(ICU)。机动车碰撞(63.8%)是主要死亡原因。45.5%的患者有头部损伤。7家医院中的2家接收了约50%的患者,但仅占总死亡人数的25.8% (p结论:创伤死亡主要发生在年轻男性中,机动车交通碰撞是主要原因。超过85%的院内死亡发生在ICU和ED,主要是头部受伤。通过执法和改善急诊科和ICU的医院护理来预防交通碰撞伤害,将减少创伤性死亡。
{"title":"Trauma deaths of hospitalized patients in Abu Dhabi Emirate: a retrospective descriptive study.","authors":"David O Alao,&nbsp;Arif Alper Cevik,&nbsp;Fikri M Abu-Zidan","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00501-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00501-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To study the epidemiology and pattern of trauma-related deaths of hospitalized patients in Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates, in order to improve trauma management and injury prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Abu Dhabi Trauma Registry prospectively collects data of all hospitalized trauma patients from seven major trauma centres in Abu Dhabi Emirate. We studied all patients who died on arrival or after admission to these hospitals from January 2014 to December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 453 deaths constituting 13.5% of all trauma deaths in the Abu Dhabi Emirate. The median (IQR) age of the patients was 33 (25-45) years, and 82% were males. 85% of the deaths occurred in the emergency department (ED) and the intensive care unit (ICU). Motor vehicle collision (63.8%) was the leading cause of death. 45.5% of the patients had head injury. Two of the seven hospitals admitted around 50% of all patients but accounted for only 25.8% of the total deaths (p < 0.001). Those who died in the ward (7%) were significantly older, median (IQR) age: of 65.5 (31.75-82.25) years, (p < 0.001), 34.4% of them were females (p = 0.09). The median (IQR) GCS of those who died in the ward was 15 (5.75-15) compared with 3 (3-3) for those who died in ED and ICU (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Death from trauma predominantly affects young males with motor traffic collision as the leading cause. Over 85% of in-hospital deaths occur in the ICU and ED, mainly from head injuries. Injury prevention of traffic collisions through enforcement of law and improved hospital care in the ED and ICU will reduce trauma death.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148441/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9414720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The new timing in acute care surgery (new TACS) classification: a WSES Delphi consensus study. 急诊外科手术新时机(新TACS)分类:一项WSES Delphi共识研究。
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00499-3
Belinda De Simone, Yoram Kluger, Ernest E Moore, Massimo Sartelli, Fikri M Abu-Zidan, Federico Coccolini, Luca Ansaloni, Giovanni D Tebala, Salomone Di Saverio, Isidoro Di Carlo, Boris E Sakakushev, Luigi Bonavina, Michael Sugrue, Joseph M Galante, Rao Ivatury, Edoardo Picetti, Mircea Chirica, Imtiaz Wani, Miklosh Bala, Ibrahima Sall, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Vishal G Shelat, Emmanouil Pikoulis, Ari Leppäniemi, Edward Tan, Richard P G Ten Broek, Solomon Gurmu Beka, Andrey Litvin, Elie Chouillard, Raul Coimbra, Yunfeng Cui, Nicola De' Angelis, Gabriele Sganga, Philip F Stahel, Vanni Agnoletti, Alessia Rampini, Mario Testini, Francesca Bravi, Ronald V Maier, Walter L Biffl, Fausto Catena

Background: Timely access to the operating room for emergency general surgery (EGS) indications remains a challenge across the globe, largely driven by operating room availability and staffing constraints. The "timing in acute care surgery" (TACS) classification was previously published to introduce a new tool to triage the timely and appropriate access of EGS patients to the operating room. However, the clinical and operational effectiveness of the TACS classification has not been investigated in subsequent validation studies. This study aimed to improve the TACS classification and provide further consensus around the appropriate use of the new TACS classification through a standardized Delphi approach with international experts.

Methods: This is a validation study of the new TACS by a selected international panel of experts using the Delphi method. The TACS questionnaire was designed as a web-based survey. The consensus agreement level was established to be ≥ 75%. The collective consensus agreement was defined as the sum of the percentage of the highest Likert scale levels (4-5) out of all participants. Surgical emergency diseases and correlated clinical scenarios were defined for each of the proposed classes. Subsequent rounds were carried out until a definitive level of consensus was reached. Frequencies and percentages were calculated to determine the degree of agreement for each surgical disease.

Results: Four polling rounds were carried out. The new TACS classification provides 6 colour-code classes correlated to a precise timing to surgery, defined scenarios and surgical condition. The WHITE colour-code class was introduced to rapidly (within a week) reschedule cancelled or postponed surgical procedures. Haemodynamic stability is the main tool to stratify patients for immediate surgery or not in the presence of sepsis/septic shock. Fifty-one surgical diseases were included in the different colour-code classes of priority.

Conclusion: The new TACS classification is a comprehensive, simple, clear and reproducible triage system which can be used to assess the severity of the patient and the surgical disease, to reduce the time to access to the operating room, and to manage the emergency surgical patients within a "safe" timeframe. By including well-defined surgical diseases in the different colour-code classes of priority, validated through a Delphi consensus, the new TACS improves communication among surgeons, between surgeons and anaesthesiologists and decreases conflicts and waste and waiting time in accessing the operating room for emergency surgical patients.

背景:在全球范围内,急诊普通外科(EGS)指征的及时进入手术室仍然是一个挑战,主要受手术室可用性和人员配备限制的驱动。“急性护理手术时机”(TACS)分类此前已发布,旨在引入一种新工具,对EGS患者及时、适当地进入手术室进行分类。然而,TACS分类的临床和操作有效性尚未在随后的验证研究中进行调查。本研究旨在通过与国际专家的标准化德尔菲法,改进TACS分类,并就新TACS分类的适当使用提供进一步的共识。方法:这是一项新的TACS的验证研究,由选定的国际专家小组使用德尔菲法。TACS问卷设计为基于网络的调查。一致同意水平为≥75%。集体共识协议被定义为所有参与者中李克特量表最高水平(4-5)的百分比之和。外科急诊疾病和相关的临床情况被定义为每一个建议的类别。随后进行了几轮谈判,直到达成了明确的协商一致意见。计算频率和百分比以确定每种外科疾病的一致程度。结果:进行了四轮投票。新的TACS分类提供了6种颜色编码,与手术的精确时间、定义的场景和手术条件相关。白色代码班被引入到快速(在一周内)重新安排取消或推迟的外科手术。血流动力学稳定性是判定患者是否存在败血症/感染性休克时立即手术的主要工具。51种外科疾病被列入不同颜色编码的优先类别。结论:新的TACS分类是一种全面、简单、清晰、可重复的分诊系统,可用于评估患者和外科疾病的严重程度,减少进入手术室的时间,在“安全”的时间内管理急诊外科患者。通过德尔福共识(Delphi consensus)验证,以不同颜色编码的优先级包括定义明确的外科疾病,新的TACS改善了外科医生之间、外科医生和麻醉师之间的沟通,减少了急诊外科患者进入手术室的冲突、浪费和等待时间。
{"title":"The new timing in acute care surgery (new TACS) classification: a WSES Delphi consensus study.","authors":"Belinda De Simone,&nbsp;Yoram Kluger,&nbsp;Ernest E Moore,&nbsp;Massimo Sartelli,&nbsp;Fikri M Abu-Zidan,&nbsp;Federico Coccolini,&nbsp;Luca Ansaloni,&nbsp;Giovanni D Tebala,&nbsp;Salomone Di Saverio,&nbsp;Isidoro Di Carlo,&nbsp;Boris E Sakakushev,&nbsp;Luigi Bonavina,&nbsp;Michael Sugrue,&nbsp;Joseph M Galante,&nbsp;Rao Ivatury,&nbsp;Edoardo Picetti,&nbsp;Mircea Chirica,&nbsp;Imtiaz Wani,&nbsp;Miklosh Bala,&nbsp;Ibrahima Sall,&nbsp;Andrew W Kirkpatrick,&nbsp;Vishal G Shelat,&nbsp;Emmanouil Pikoulis,&nbsp;Ari Leppäniemi,&nbsp;Edward Tan,&nbsp;Richard P G Ten Broek,&nbsp;Solomon Gurmu Beka,&nbsp;Andrey Litvin,&nbsp;Elie Chouillard,&nbsp;Raul Coimbra,&nbsp;Yunfeng Cui,&nbsp;Nicola De' Angelis,&nbsp;Gabriele Sganga,&nbsp;Philip F Stahel,&nbsp;Vanni Agnoletti,&nbsp;Alessia Rampini,&nbsp;Mario Testini,&nbsp;Francesca Bravi,&nbsp;Ronald V Maier,&nbsp;Walter L Biffl,&nbsp;Fausto Catena","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00499-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00499-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely access to the operating room for emergency general surgery (EGS) indications remains a challenge across the globe, largely driven by operating room availability and staffing constraints. The \"timing in acute care surgery\" (TACS) classification was previously published to introduce a new tool to triage the timely and appropriate access of EGS patients to the operating room. However, the clinical and operational effectiveness of the TACS classification has not been investigated in subsequent validation studies. This study aimed to improve the TACS classification and provide further consensus around the appropriate use of the new TACS classification through a standardized Delphi approach with international experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a validation study of the new TACS by a selected international panel of experts using the Delphi method. The TACS questionnaire was designed as a web-based survey. The consensus agreement level was established to be ≥ 75%. The collective consensus agreement was defined as the sum of the percentage of the highest Likert scale levels (4-5) out of all participants. Surgical emergency diseases and correlated clinical scenarios were defined for each of the proposed classes. Subsequent rounds were carried out until a definitive level of consensus was reached. Frequencies and percentages were calculated to determine the degree of agreement for each surgical disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four polling rounds were carried out. The new TACS classification provides 6 colour-code classes correlated to a precise timing to surgery, defined scenarios and surgical condition. The WHITE colour-code class was introduced to rapidly (within a week) reschedule cancelled or postponed surgical procedures. Haemodynamic stability is the main tool to stratify patients for immediate surgery or not in the presence of sepsis/septic shock. Fifty-one surgical diseases were included in the different colour-code classes of priority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new TACS classification is a comprehensive, simple, clear and reproducible triage system which can be used to assess the severity of the patient and the surgical disease, to reduce the time to access to the operating room, and to manage the emergency surgical patients within a \"safe\" timeframe. By including well-defined surgical diseases in the different colour-code classes of priority, validated through a Delphi consensus, the new TACS improves communication among surgeons, between surgeons and anaesthesiologists and decreases conflicts and waste and waiting time in accessing the operating room for emergency surgical patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147354/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9418885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Unlocking the potential of TIPS placement as a bridge to elective and emergency surgery in cirrhotic patients: a meta-analysis and future directions for endovascular resuscitation in acute care surgery. 释放TIPS作为肝硬化患者选择性和紧急手术的桥梁的潜力:一项荟萃分析和急性护理手术血管内复苏的未来方向
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2023-04-17 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00498-4
Ramiro Manzano-Nunez, Alba Jimenez-Masip, Julian Chica-Yanten, Abdelaziz Ibn-Abdelouahab, Massimo Sartelli, Nicola de'Angelis, Ernest E Moore, Alberto F García

Background: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined the evidence on transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as a bridge to elective and emergency surgery in cirrhotic patients. We aimed to assess the perioperative characteristics, management approaches, and outcomes of this intervention, which is used to achieve portal decompression and enable the safe performance of elective and emergent surgery.

Methods: MEDLINE and Scopus were searched for studies reporting the outcomes of cirrhotic patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery with preoperative TIPS. The risk of bias was evaluated using the methodological index for non-randomized studies of interventions, and the JBI critical appraisal tool for case reports. The outcomes of interest were: 1. Surgery after TIPS; 2. Mortality; 3. Perioperative transfusions; and 4. Postoperative liver-related events. A DerSimonian and Laird (random-effects) model was used to perform the meta-analyses in which the overall (combined) effect estimate was presented in the form of an odds ratio (summary statistic).

Results: Of 426 patients (from 27 articles), 256 (60.1%) underwent preoperative TIPS. Random effects MA showed significantly lower odds of postoperative ascites with preoperative TIPS (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.72; I2 = 0%). There were no significant differences in 90-day mortality (3 studies: OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.33-1.77; I2 = 18.2%), perioperative transfusion requirement (3 studies: OR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.28-2,84; I2 = 70.1%), postoperative hepatic encephalopathy (2 studies: OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.35-2.69; I2 = 0%), and postoperative ACLF (3 studies: OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.15-6.8, I2 = 78.9%).

Conclusions: Preoperative TIPS appears safe in cirrhotic patients who undergo elective and emergency surgery and may have a potential role in postoperative ascites control. Future randomized clinical trials should test these preliminary results.

背景:在这篇系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们研究了经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)作为肝硬化患者择期和急诊手术的桥梁的证据。我们的目的是评估这种干预的围手术期特征、管理方法和结果,这种干预用于实现门静脉减压,并使选择性和紧急手术能够安全进行。方法:检索MEDLINE和Scopus中关于肝硬化患者择期和急诊手术术前TIPS的研究结果。使用干预措施的非随机研究的方法学指数和病例报告的JBI关键评估工具来评估偏倚风险。感兴趣的结果是:1。TIPS后手术;2. 死亡率;3.围手术期输血;和4。术后肝脏相关事件。使用DerSimonian和Laird(随机效应)模型进行meta分析,其中总体(组合)效应估计以优势比(汇总统计量)的形式呈现。结果:426例患者(来自27篇文章)中,256例(60.1%)接受了术前TIPS。随机效应MA显示术前TIPS术后腹水发生率显著低于术前TIPS (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.72;i2 = 0%)。90天死亡率无显著差异(3项研究:OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.33-1.77;I2 = 18.2%),围手术期输血需求(3项研究:OR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.28-2,84;I2 = 70.1%),术后肝性脑病(2项研究:OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.35-2.69;I2 = 0%)和术后ACLF(3项研究:OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.15-6.8, I2 = 78.9%)。结论:对于接受选择性和紧急手术的肝硬化患者,术前TIPS似乎是安全的,并可能在术后腹水控制中发挥潜在作用。未来的随机临床试验应该检验这些初步结果。
{"title":"Unlocking the potential of TIPS placement as a bridge to elective and emergency surgery in cirrhotic patients: a meta-analysis and future directions for endovascular resuscitation in acute care surgery.","authors":"Ramiro Manzano-Nunez,&nbsp;Alba Jimenez-Masip,&nbsp;Julian Chica-Yanten,&nbsp;Abdelaziz Ibn-Abdelouahab,&nbsp;Massimo Sartelli,&nbsp;Nicola de'Angelis,&nbsp;Ernest E Moore,&nbsp;Alberto F García","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00498-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00498-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined the evidence on transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as a bridge to elective and emergency surgery in cirrhotic patients. We aimed to assess the perioperative characteristics, management approaches, and outcomes of this intervention, which is used to achieve portal decompression and enable the safe performance of elective and emergent surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and Scopus were searched for studies reporting the outcomes of cirrhotic patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery with preoperative TIPS. The risk of bias was evaluated using the methodological index for non-randomized studies of interventions, and the JBI critical appraisal tool for case reports. The outcomes of interest were: 1. Surgery after TIPS; 2. Mortality; 3. Perioperative transfusions; and 4. Postoperative liver-related events. A DerSimonian and Laird (random-effects) model was used to perform the meta-analyses in which the overall (combined) effect estimate was presented in the form of an odds ratio (summary statistic).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 426 patients (from 27 articles), 256 (60.1%) underwent preoperative TIPS. Random effects MA showed significantly lower odds of postoperative ascites with preoperative TIPS (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.72; I2 = 0%). There were no significant differences in 90-day mortality (3 studies: OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.33-1.77; I2 = 18.2%), perioperative transfusion requirement (3 studies: OR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.28-2,84; I2 = 70.1%), postoperative hepatic encephalopathy (2 studies: OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.35-2.69; I2 = 0%), and postoperative ACLF (3 studies: OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.15-6.8, I2 = 78.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative TIPS appears safe in cirrhotic patients who undergo elective and emergency surgery and may have a potential role in postoperative ascites control. Future randomized clinical trials should test these preliminary results.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111768/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9468412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Correction: Early management of isolated severe traumatic brain injury patients in a hospital without neurosurgical capabilities: a consensus and clinical recommendations of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). 更正:在没有神经外科手术能力的医院对孤立性严重创伤性脑损伤患者的早期处理:世界急诊外科学会(WSES)的共识和临床建议。
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2023-04-06 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00489-5
Edoardo Picetti, Fausto Catena, Fikri Abu-Zidan, Luca Ansaloni, Rocco A Armonda, Miklosh Bala, Zsolt J Balogh, Alessandro Bertuccio, Walt L Biffl, Pierre Bouzat, Andras Buki, Davide Cerasti, Randall M Chesnut, Giuseppe Citerio, Federico Coccolini, Raul Coimbra, Carlo Coniglio, Enrico Fainardi, Deepak Gupta, Jennifer M Gurney, Gregory W J Hawryluk, Raimund Helbok, Peter J A Hutchinson, Corrado Iaccarino, Angelos Kolias, Ronald W Maier, Matthew J Martin, Geert Meyfroidt, David O Okonkwo, Frank Rasulo, Sandro Rizoli, Andres Rubiano, Juan Sahuquillo, Valerie G Sams, Franco Servadei, Deepak Sharma, Lori Shutter, Philip F Stahel, Fabio S Taccone, Andrew Udy, Tommaso Zoerle, Vanni Agnoletti, Francesca Bravi, Belinda De Simone, Yoram Kluger, Costanza Martino, Ernest E Moore, Massimo Sartelli, Dieter Weber, Chiara Robba
{"title":"Correction: Early management of isolated severe traumatic brain injury patients in a hospital without neurosurgical capabilities: a consensus and clinical recommendations of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES).","authors":"Edoardo Picetti,&nbsp;Fausto Catena,&nbsp;Fikri Abu-Zidan,&nbsp;Luca Ansaloni,&nbsp;Rocco A Armonda,&nbsp;Miklosh Bala,&nbsp;Zsolt J Balogh,&nbsp;Alessandro Bertuccio,&nbsp;Walt L Biffl,&nbsp;Pierre Bouzat,&nbsp;Andras Buki,&nbsp;Davide Cerasti,&nbsp;Randall M Chesnut,&nbsp;Giuseppe Citerio,&nbsp;Federico Coccolini,&nbsp;Raul Coimbra,&nbsp;Carlo Coniglio,&nbsp;Enrico Fainardi,&nbsp;Deepak Gupta,&nbsp;Jennifer M Gurney,&nbsp;Gregory W J Hawryluk,&nbsp;Raimund Helbok,&nbsp;Peter J A Hutchinson,&nbsp;Corrado Iaccarino,&nbsp;Angelos Kolias,&nbsp;Ronald W Maier,&nbsp;Matthew J Martin,&nbsp;Geert Meyfroidt,&nbsp;David O Okonkwo,&nbsp;Frank Rasulo,&nbsp;Sandro Rizoli,&nbsp;Andres Rubiano,&nbsp;Juan Sahuquillo,&nbsp;Valerie G Sams,&nbsp;Franco Servadei,&nbsp;Deepak Sharma,&nbsp;Lori Shutter,&nbsp;Philip F Stahel,&nbsp;Fabio S Taccone,&nbsp;Andrew Udy,&nbsp;Tommaso Zoerle,&nbsp;Vanni Agnoletti,&nbsp;Francesca Bravi,&nbsp;Belinda De Simone,&nbsp;Yoram Kluger,&nbsp;Costanza Martino,&nbsp;Ernest E Moore,&nbsp;Massimo Sartelli,&nbsp;Dieter Weber,&nbsp;Chiara Robba","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00489-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00489-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080738/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9260916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Risk factors for the leakage of the repair of duodenal wounds: a secondary analysis of the Panamerican Trauma Society multicenter retrospective review. 十二指肠伤口修复渗漏的风险因素:对泛美创伤协会多中心回顾性研究的二次分析。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2023-04-04 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00494-8
Alberto García, Alvaro I Sanchez, Paula Ferrada, Luke Wolfe, Juan Duchesne, Gustavo P Fraga, Elizabeth Benjamin, Andre Campbell, Carlos Morales, Bruno M Pereira, Marcelo Ribeiro, Martha Quiodettis, Gregory Peck, Juan C Salamea, Vitor F Kruger, Rao Ivatury, Thomas Scalea
{"title":"Risk factors for the leakage of the repair of duodenal wounds: a secondary analysis of the Panamerican Trauma Society multicenter retrospective review.","authors":"Alberto García, Alvaro I Sanchez, Paula Ferrada, Luke Wolfe, Juan Duchesne, Gustavo P Fraga, Elizabeth Benjamin, Andre Campbell, Carlos Morales, Bruno M Pereira, Marcelo Ribeiro, Martha Quiodettis, Gregory Peck, Juan C Salamea, Vitor F Kruger, Rao Ivatury, Thomas Scalea","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00494-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13017-023-00494-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074841/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9781909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emergency administration of fibrinogen concentrate for haemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis. 纤维蛋白原浓缩物对出血的紧急管理:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2023-03-30 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00497-5
Yuki Itagaki, Mineji Hayakawa, Yuki Takahashi, Satoshi Hirano, Kazuma Yamakawa

Introduction: The occurrence of massive haemorrhages in various emergency situations increases the need for blood transfusions and increases the risk of mortality. Fibrinogen concentrate (FC) use may increase plasma fibrinogen levels more rapidly than fresh-frozen product or cryoprecipitate use. Previous several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have not effectively demonstrated FC efficacy in significantly improving the risk of mortality and reducing transfusion requirements. In this study, we investigated the use of FC for haemorrhages in emergency situations.

Methods and analysis: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included controlled trials, but excluded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in elective surgeries. The study population consisted of patients with haemorrhages in emergency situations, and the intervention was emergency supplementation of FC. The control group was administered with ordinal transfusion or placebo. The primary and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and the amount of transfusion and thrombotic events, respectively. The electronic databases searched included MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

Results: Nine RCTs in the qualitative synthesis with a total of 701 patients were included. Results showed a slight increase in in-hospital mortality with FC treatment (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.64-2.39, p = 0.52) with very low certainty of the evidence. There was no reduction in the use of red blood cells (RBC) transfusion in the first 24 h after admission with FC treatment (mean difference [MD] 0.0 Unit in the FC group, 95% CI - 0.99-0.98, p = 0.99) with very low certainty of the evidence. However, the use of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion significantly increased in the first 24 h after admission with FC treatment (MD 2.61 Unit higher in the FC group, 95% CI 0.07-5.16, p = 0.04). The occurrence of thrombotic events did not significantly differ with FC treatment.

Conclusions: The present study indicates that the use of FC may result in a slight increase in in-hospital mortality. While FC did not appear to reduce the use of RBC transfusion, it likely increased the use of FFP transfusion and may result in a large increase in platelet concentrate transfusion. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the unbalanced severity in the patient population, high heterogeneity, and risk of bias.

在各种紧急情况下大出血的发生增加了对输血的需求,并增加了死亡的风险。使用纤维蛋白原浓缩物(FC)可能比使用新鲜冷冻产品或冷冻沉淀更快地增加血浆纤维蛋白原水平。以前的一些系统综述和荟萃分析并没有有效地证明FC在显著提高死亡率风险和减少输血需求方面的功效。在这项研究中,我们调查了在紧急情况下使用FC治疗出血。方法和分析:在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们纳入了对照试验,但排除了择期手术的随机对照试验(rct)。研究人群为急诊出血患者,干预措施为紧急补充FC。对照组给予常规输血或安慰剂。主要和次要结局分别是住院死亡率、输血量和血栓事件。检索的电子数据库包括MEDLINE (PubMed)、Web of Science和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials。结果:定性综合纳入9项rct,共纳入701例患者。结果显示,FC治疗的住院死亡率略有增加(RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.64-2.39, p = 0.52),证据的确定性非常低。在接受FC治疗入院后的前24小时内,红细胞(RBC)输血的使用没有减少(FC组的平均差异[MD] 0.0个单位,95% CI - 0.99-0.98, p = 0.99),证据的确定性非常低。然而,新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)输血的使用在FC治疗入院后的前24小时内显著增加(FC组的MD高2.61单位,95% CI 0.07-5.16, p = 0.04)。血栓事件的发生与FC治疗没有显著差异。结论:本研究表明,FC的使用可能导致住院死亡率的轻微增加。虽然FC似乎没有减少红细胞输血的使用,但它可能增加了FFP输血的使用,并可能导致血小板浓缩物输血的大量增加。然而,由于患者群体的严重程度不平衡、高异质性和偏倚风险,结果应谨慎解释。
{"title":"Emergency administration of fibrinogen concentrate for haemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yuki Itagaki,&nbsp;Mineji Hayakawa,&nbsp;Yuki Takahashi,&nbsp;Satoshi Hirano,&nbsp;Kazuma Yamakawa","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00497-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00497-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The occurrence of massive haemorrhages in various emergency situations increases the need for blood transfusions and increases the risk of mortality. Fibrinogen concentrate (FC) use may increase plasma fibrinogen levels more rapidly than fresh-frozen product or cryoprecipitate use. Previous several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have not effectively demonstrated FC efficacy in significantly improving the risk of mortality and reducing transfusion requirements. In this study, we investigated the use of FC for haemorrhages in emergency situations.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included controlled trials, but excluded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in elective surgeries. The study population consisted of patients with haemorrhages in emergency situations, and the intervention was emergency supplementation of FC. The control group was administered with ordinal transfusion or placebo. The primary and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and the amount of transfusion and thrombotic events, respectively. The electronic databases searched included MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine RCTs in the qualitative synthesis with a total of 701 patients were included. Results showed a slight increase in in-hospital mortality with FC treatment (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.64-2.39, p = 0.52) with very low certainty of the evidence. There was no reduction in the use of red blood cells (RBC) transfusion in the first 24 h after admission with FC treatment (mean difference [MD] 0.0 Unit in the FC group, 95% CI - 0.99-0.98, p = 0.99) with very low certainty of the evidence. However, the use of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion significantly increased in the first 24 h after admission with FC treatment (MD 2.61 Unit higher in the FC group, 95% CI 0.07-5.16, p = 0.04). The occurrence of thrombotic events did not significantly differ with FC treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study indicates that the use of FC may result in a slight increase in in-hospital mortality. While FC did not appear to reduce the use of RBC transfusion, it likely increased the use of FFP transfusion and may result in a large increase in platelet concentrate transfusion. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the unbalanced severity in the patient population, high heterogeneity, and risk of bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061696/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9412966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1