The efficacy of surgical intervention for traumatic rib fractures in improving clinical outcomes remains a subject of considerable debate. Over the past decade, the adoption of surgical stabilization for rib fractures (SSRF) has increased substantially. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature published over the past 20 years, with the objective of comparing the clinical outcomes of adult patients with multiple traumatic rib fractures who underwent SSRF, relative to those treated conservatively. We searched six online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Sino-American Clinical Trials Database) for literature published between June 2004 and June 2024. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) tool were employed to assess methodological quality, and relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate the outcome measures. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, while the secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (HLOS), ICU length of stay (ILOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), and the incidence of pneumonia. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the effects of fracture type, age, timing of surgical fixation, and study design on treatment outcomes. A total of 47 studies involving 1,078,795 patients were included, consisting of three randomized controlled trials and 44 case–control studies. The results demonstrated that patients who underwent SSRF experienced better outcomes than those receiving conservative treatment in terms of all-cause mortality. However, SSRF was not superior to conservative treatment regarding HLOS, ILOS, or health care costs. Subgroup analyses revealed that the SSRF group had a lower incidence of pneumonia and shorter DMV in patients with flail chest, and patients older than 60 years may also benefit from SSRF, Furthermore, those who underwent SSRF within 72 h had shorter HLOS and DMV compared to those treated conservatively. SSRF reduces mortality in patients with multiple rib fractures compared to conservative management, particularly in those with flail chest and in patients over 60 years of age. It also offers benefits in terms of pneumonia incidence and DMV for patients with flail chest. Early SSRF may significantly reduce HLOS and DMV. However, careful screening of appropriate candidates is crucial to maximize the benefits of SSRF.
外伤性肋骨骨折的手术干预在改善临床结果方面的有效性仍然是一个相当有争议的话题。在过去的十年中,采用手术稳定治疗肋骨骨折(SSRF)已经大大增加。本研究对过去20年发表的文献进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,目的是比较多发外伤性肋骨骨折成人患者接受SSRF治疗与保守治疗的临床结果。我们检索了6个在线数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library和中美临床试验数据库),检索了2004年6月至2024年6月间发表的文献。采用Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2)和Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS)工具评估方法学质量,计算具有95%置信区间(CI)的相对风险(RR)来评估结果测量。主要结局为全因死亡率,次要结局包括住院时间(HLOS)、ICU住院时间(ILOS)、机械通气时间(DMV)和肺炎发生率。进行亚组分析以评估骨折类型、年龄、手术固定时间和研究设计对治疗结果的影响。共纳入47项研究,涉及1,078,795例患者,包括3项随机对照试验和44项病例对照研究。结果表明,在全因死亡率方面,接受SSRF治疗的患者比接受保守治疗的患者有更好的结果。然而,在HLOS、ILOS或医疗费用方面,SSRF并不优于保守治疗。亚组分析显示,SSRF组连枷胸患者的肺炎发生率较低,DMV较短,年龄大于60岁的患者也可能受益于SSRF。此外,与保守治疗的患者相比,在72小时内接受SSRF治疗的患者HLOS和DMV较短。与保守治疗相比,SSRF降低了多发肋骨骨折患者的死亡率,尤其是连枷胸患者和60岁以上患者。它还为连枷胸患者提供肺炎发病率和DMV方面的益处。早期SSRF可显著降低HLOS和DMV。然而,仔细筛选合适的候选人对于最大化SSRF的益处至关重要。
{"title":"Clinical outcome analysis for surgical fixation versus conservative treatment on rib fractures: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis","authors":"Penglong Zhao, Qiyue Ge, Haotian Zheng, Jing Luo, Xiaobin Song, Liwen Hu","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00581-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00581-y","url":null,"abstract":"The efficacy of surgical intervention for traumatic rib fractures in improving clinical outcomes remains a subject of considerable debate. Over the past decade, the adoption of surgical stabilization for rib fractures (SSRF) has increased substantially. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature published over the past 20 years, with the objective of comparing the clinical outcomes of adult patients with multiple traumatic rib fractures who underwent SSRF, relative to those treated conservatively. We searched six online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Sino-American Clinical Trials Database) for literature published between June 2004 and June 2024. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) tool were employed to assess methodological quality, and relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate the outcome measures. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, while the secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (HLOS), ICU length of stay (ILOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), and the incidence of pneumonia. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the effects of fracture type, age, timing of surgical fixation, and study design on treatment outcomes. A total of 47 studies involving 1,078,795 patients were included, consisting of three randomized controlled trials and 44 case–control studies. The results demonstrated that patients who underwent SSRF experienced better outcomes than those receiving conservative treatment in terms of all-cause mortality. However, SSRF was not superior to conservative treatment regarding HLOS, ILOS, or health care costs. Subgroup analyses revealed that the SSRF group had a lower incidence of pneumonia and shorter DMV in patients with flail chest, and patients older than 60 years may also benefit from SSRF, Furthermore, those who underwent SSRF within 72 h had shorter HLOS and DMV compared to those treated conservatively. SSRF reduces mortality in patients with multiple rib fractures compared to conservative management, particularly in those with flail chest and in patients over 60 years of age. It also offers benefits in terms of pneumonia incidence and DMV for patients with flail chest. Early SSRF may significantly reduce HLOS and DMV. However, careful screening of appropriate candidates is crucial to maximize the benefits of SSRF.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"79 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143125289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study aimed to identify risk factors for rebleeding within 180 days post-discharge in blunt splenic injury patients managed without splenectomy or embolization. A retrospective analysis was conducted using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. Adult patients aged ≥ 18 years with blunt splenic injury (ICD-9-CM codes 865.01–865.09) from 2000 to 2012 were included. Patients who died, underwent splenectomy (ICD-9-OP codes 41.5, 41.42,41.43, and 41.95) or transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) (ICD-9-OP codes 39.79 and 99.29) on the first admission were excluded. The primary endpoint was rebleeding, which was identified if patients underwent splenectomy or TAE at 180 days after discharge. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors, which were validated in a separate cohort. Of 6,140 patients, 80 (1.302%) experienced rebleeding within 180 days. Five significant risk factors were identified: age < 54 years (aOR 3.129, p = 0.014), male sex (aOR 2.691, p = 0.010), non-traffic accident-induced injury (aOR 2.459, p = 0.006), ISS ≥ 16 (aOR 2.130, p = 0.021), and congestive heart failure (aOR 6.014, p = 0.006). We generate Delayed Splenic Bleeding System (DSBS). Patients with > 2 points had significantly higher rebleeding rates (risk-identifying cohort: 2.2% vs. 0.6%, OR 3.790, p < 0.001; validation cohort: 2.6% vs. 0.8%, OR 3.129, p = 0.022). Age < 54 years, male, non-traffic accident-induced injury, ISS ≥ 16, and congestive heart failure are risk factors of rebleeding within 180 days after discharge from treating blunt splenic injury without splenectomy or embolization. Despite limitations, this study underscores large-scale data’s role in identifying risks which can aid clinicians in prioritizing additional interventions during NOM.
本研究旨在确定未经脾切除术或栓塞治疗的钝性脾损伤患者出院后180天内再出血的危险因素。本研究采用台湾全民健保研究资料库进行回顾性分析。纳入2000 - 2012年年龄≥18岁的成人钝性脾损伤患者(ICD-9-CM代码865.01-865.09)。排除首次入院时死亡、行脾切除术(ICD-9-OP代码41.5、41.42、41.43和41.95)或经导管动脉栓塞(ICD-9-OP代码39.79和99.29)的患者。主要终点是再出血,如果患者在出院后180天接受脾切除术或TAE,则确定再出血。多变量逻辑回归用于确定危险因素,并在单独的队列中进行验证。在6140例患者中,80例(1.302%)在180天内再次出血。确定了5个显著的危险因素:2岁时再出血率显著升高(风险识别队列:2.2% vs. 0.6%, OR 3.790, p < 0.001;验证队列:2.6% vs. 0.8%, OR 3.129, p = 0.022)。年龄< 54岁,男性,非交通事故性损伤,ISS≥16,充血性心力衰竭是钝性脾损伤未经脾切除术或栓塞治疗出院后180天内再出血的危险因素。尽管存在局限性,但该研究强调了大规模数据在识别风险方面的作用,这可以帮助临床医生在NOM期间优先考虑额外的干预措施。
{"title":"Risk factors of 180-day rebleeding after management of blunt splenic injury without surgery and embolization: a national database study","authors":"Chung-Yen Chen, Hung-Yu Lin, Pie-Wen Hsieh, Yi-Kai Huang, Po-Chin Yu, Jian-Han Chen","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00586-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00586-7","url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to identify risk factors for rebleeding within 180 days post-discharge in blunt splenic injury patients managed without splenectomy or embolization. A retrospective analysis was conducted using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. Adult patients aged ≥ 18 years with blunt splenic injury (ICD-9-CM codes 865.01–865.09) from 2000 to 2012 were included. Patients who died, underwent splenectomy (ICD-9-OP codes 41.5, 41.42,41.43, and 41.95) or transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) (ICD-9-OP codes 39.79 and 99.29) on the first admission were excluded. The primary endpoint was rebleeding, which was identified if patients underwent splenectomy or TAE at 180 days after discharge. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors, which were validated in a separate cohort. Of 6,140 patients, 80 (1.302%) experienced rebleeding within 180 days. Five significant risk factors were identified: age < 54 years (aOR 3.129, p = 0.014), male sex (aOR 2.691, p = 0.010), non-traffic accident-induced injury (aOR 2.459, p = 0.006), ISS ≥ 16 (aOR 2.130, p = 0.021), and congestive heart failure (aOR 6.014, p = 0.006). We generate Delayed Splenic Bleeding System (DSBS). Patients with > 2 points had significantly higher rebleeding rates (risk-identifying cohort: 2.2% vs. 0.6%, OR 3.790, p < 0.001; validation cohort: 2.6% vs. 0.8%, OR 3.129, p = 0.022). Age < 54 years, male, non-traffic accident-induced injury, ISS ≥ 16, and congestive heart failure are risk factors of rebleeding within 180 days after discharge from treating blunt splenic injury without splenectomy or embolization. Despite limitations, this study underscores large-scale data’s role in identifying risks which can aid clinicians in prioritizing additional interventions during NOM.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143125206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00573-4
Antonio Pesce, Rosario Lombardo, Antonio Di Cataldo, Gaetano La Greca
<p><i>Dear Editor</i>,</p><p>We enjoyed reading the article by Toro A et al. [1], in which the authors reported a preliminary experience with a new technique to avoid subtotal cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. We would like to raise some interesting points and comments.</p><p>The authors reported that only three patients have undergone this technique in the last two years; this is a very small sample size for a trauma center service. Moreover, in the results section, the authors stated that “in the last 2 years from January 2019 to December 2021”, but this time interval spans three years, not two.</p><p>The original French technique is characterized by four-ports insertion. We would like to inquire why the authors used three ports in acute cholecystitis, where laparoscopic surgery is undoubtedly more challenging. However, it has been demonstrated that there isn’t any significant clinical benefit in using fewer than four-ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to the standard four-ports approach during elective procedures. In emergency settings, the presence of dense fibrosis and inflammation of the hepatoduodenal ligament, as well as diffuse cholecysto-omental and cholecysto-duodeno-colic adhesions, may hinder proper exposure of the hepatocystic triangle when using only three ports. This increases the risk of iatrogenic biliary, vascular, and visceral injuries. In our opinion, under these specific conditions, the use of a fourth trocar is helpful to pull the gallbladder fundus upwards and facilitate wide exposure of the hepatocystic triangle, ensuring the safe dissection of Calot’s triangle [2]. Moreover, the three ports approach may lead to subsequent medico-legal litigations in case of biliary iatrogenic injuries. Neverthless, while a four-port approach may offer better exposure, particularly in this specific technique and generally in difficult cases, experienced surgeons may opt for a three-port approach if they are confident in their ability to handle challenging intraoperative situations. In such cases as patients with transhepatic percutaneous cholecystostomy, the three-port approach may be useful and sufficient without the need for a fourth trocar. Surgeons should feel empowered to adapt their approach based on intraoperative findings and should not hesitate to add an additional port at any time if they encounter difficulties during dissection.</p><p>Another technical comment is related to trocars’ size: the authors used two 5-mm operative trocars. Using a 5-mm clips applicator on an inflamed and edematous cystic duct in acute cholecystitis can indeed pose some challenges and risks, such as difficulties in performing a reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy where the use of a linear endostapler might be necessary. There is also a risk that the clips may not securely close the cystic duct due to the tissue’s condition, potentially leading to postoperative cystic duct leakage. One important point to emphasize is that the endostap
尊敬的编辑:我们很高兴阅读Toro A等人的文章,在这篇文章中,作者报告了一种新技术的初步经验,以避免急性胆囊炎的胆囊次全切除术。我们想提出一些有趣的观点和意见。作者报告说,在过去两年中,只有三名患者接受了这种技术;这对创伤中心来说是一个很小的样本。此外,在结果部分,作者表示“从2019年1月到2021年12月的过去两年”,但这个时间间隔是三年,而不是两年。最初的法国技术的特点是四端口插入。我们想知道为什么作者在急性胆囊炎中使用三个端口,腹腔镜手术无疑更具挑战性。然而,已经证明,在选择性手术中,与标准四孔入路相比,使用少于四孔的腹腔镜胆囊切除术没有任何显著的临床益处。在紧急情况下,肝十二指肠韧带存在致密纤维化和炎症,以及弥漫性胆囊-网膜粘连和胆囊-十二指肠-结肠粘连,当仅使用三个端口时,可能会妨碍正确暴露肝囊三角。这增加了医源性胆道、血管和内脏损伤的风险。我们认为,在这些特殊情况下,使用第四套管针有助于将胆囊底向上拉,方便肝囊三角的广泛暴露,确保Calot三角[2]的安全剥离。此外,在胆道医源性损伤的情况下,三口入路可能导致随后的医学法律诉讼。然而,虽然四孔入路可以提供更好的暴露,特别是在这种特殊的技术中,通常在困难的情况下,经验丰富的外科医生可能会选择三孔入路,如果他们对自己处理术中困难情况的能力有信心。在经肝经皮胆囊造瘘患者中,三孔入路可能是有用且足够的,不需要第四个套管针。外科医生应该感到有权根据术中发现调整入路,如果在解剖过程中遇到困难,应毫不犹豫地随时增加额外的端口。另一个技术评论与套管针的尺寸有关:作者使用了两个5毫米的手术套管针。在急性胆囊炎中,在发炎和水肿的胆囊管上使用5mm夹子确实会带来一些挑战和风险,例如在进行重建胆囊次全切除术时,可能需要使用线性内吻合器。由于组织状况,夹子可能无法安全地关闭囊管,这也有可能导致术后囊管泄漏。需要强调的一点是,内吻合器在某些危急情况下是一种有用的工具,但只有在正确识别解剖结构后才应考虑和使用,以尽量减少医源性胆道和血管损伤的风险。急性胆囊炎的胆囊炎症通常会影响胆囊壁的所有层,因此我们不理解在这种技术中将外层与内层分离的基本原理。然而,在坏疽性胆囊炎中,炎症可扩展到胆囊管-胆囊管交界处,使胆囊管闭合变得困难,并造成胆道泄漏的高风险。此外,我们认为Toro A等人所描述的内粘膜-肌肉层与外浆膜层的完全分离仅具有理论基础。它不可行,也不实用,而且与已经描述的其他技术选择(包括世界各地外科医生在严重急性胆囊炎[3]病例中常用的抢救性胆囊次全切除术)相比更为复杂。我们认为,在考虑其广泛采用之前,需要通过更大规模的研究进一步验证该技术。另一个问题是关于Toro A和同事的建议,即使用单极钩横向切割整个胆囊壁。这是一个众所周知的事实,也是熟练外科医生的共同经验,单极能量的弥漫性热效应导致所有组织凝固和收缩,不可避免地导致被作者描述为“外部浆膜和内部肌肉层”的层融合。因此,建议使用冷剪刀切割胆囊壁,对不同层进行锋利的横切,希望能够按照建议识别和分离它们。我们认为,文章中描述的技术在使用单极钩时存在胆囊漏斗穿孔的高风险,特别是在胆囊壁坏死的区域。 在厚壁胆囊粘附于十二指肠或胆总管外侧的情况下,浆膜下剥离可能是一种更好的挽救策略。然而,应使用“鸭嘴”钳进行钝性剥离,以清除漏斗囊蒂周围的脂肪和纤维组织,或使用具有水剥离效果的冲洗和吸引。我们也不理解从“胆囊内壁”内部识别胆囊管的意义,因为我们不知道胆囊内壁和外壁的区别。我们只熟悉胆囊的前壁或后壁,最多也就是胆壁的内层和外层。我们强调这些看似“不寻常”或闻所未闻的定义,如“胆囊内壁”和“前血管”,因为它们可能不幸导致对胆囊解剖的混淆,特别是对年轻的外科医生和住院医生。在解剖学和超声检查中,胆囊壁由两层组成:内部低回声层(肌层)和外部高回声层(浆膜层)。因此,“内胆壁”一词可能具有误导性。此外,术语“前血管”也令人困惑。它指的是什么?有时,囊性动脉可能有一个前浅支,它可以不同程度地靠近囊管,和一个后深支,通常平行于胆囊床。在Pesce A et al.[5]的文章中,对囊性动脉最常见的解剖变异进行了清晰的描述,如单囊性动脉起源于右肝动脉,存在两条动脉分支(浅分支和深分支),单短囊性动脉起源于caterpillar右肝动脉,单长囊性动脉不是来自右肝动脉穿过肝总管前,双囊性动脉/副囊性动脉,囊性动脉在马斯卡尼淋巴结的前部比后部多见,胆囊床后外侧缘有一条恒定的血管,囊性动脉来自胃十二指肠动脉,经过卡洛三角外。因此,我们认为,在急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,正确而深入的血管解剖学知识是必不可少的。这项技术的确切适应症尚不清楚;根据东京指南,三名接受治疗的患者表现为II级中度急性胆囊炎。在Toro A等人的手稿图2中,清晰地描述了一例坏疽性急性胆囊炎。此外,囊管看起来很容易辨认,似乎可以安全地切开。此外,这种技术并不新颖;它类似于炎性厚壁胆囊的浆膜下夹层,并伴有胆囊底部周围的夹层。在2020年,Nassar AH等人已经提出并分析了可能的抢救策略,因为解剖学或病理学上的困难,实现安全的批判性观点具有挑战性。讨论部分描述和提出的四种次全腹腔镜胆囊切除术,正是Strasberg S等人在2016年描述的“开窗”和“重构”两种技术,其变体与剩余胆囊附着在肝脏上的数量有关。另一个评论是由于没有提及ICG(吲哚菁绿)实时成像,以更好地了解肝外胆道系统的术中解剖,并确保夹层安全远离mcelmoyle危险区域[7]的关键结构。当处理困难的急性胆囊炎时,特别是在有严重炎症、纤维化或解剖扭曲的情况下,进行胆囊次全切除术可能是全胆囊切除术更安全的选择。虽然这种方法可以防止危险的并发症,如胆道损伤,但它可能导致胆道瘘或残余结石的存在。在这种情况下,患者可能需要内窥镜治疗、再次手术和长期住院,这可能导致医疗法律问题。虽然可以减少胆囊次全切除术的数量,但很少转为开放手术。然而,决定必须仔细权衡,并根据个别患者的情况和术中发现量身定制的方法。在本研究中没有生成或分析数据集。Toro A, Rapisarda M, Maugeri D, Terrasi A, Gallo L, Ansaloni L, Catena F, Di Carlo I.急性胆囊炎:如何避免胆囊次全切除术的初步结果。中华外科杂志,2014;19(1):6。https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00534-x.Article PubMed PubMed Central谷歌学者Gurusamy KS, Vaughan J, Rossi M, Davidson BR。腹腔镜胆囊切除术中少于4个孔与4个孔比较。Cochrane Database system Rev. 2014年2月20日;2014(2):CD007109。https://doi。 org/10.1002/14651858.CD007109。[2] di Cataldo A, Perrotti S, Latino R, La Greca G.为什么胆囊次全切除术比过去更频繁?中国生物医学工程学报;2009;31(4):674 - 674。https://doi.org/10.1097/XC
{"title":"Acute cholecystitis and subtotal cholecystectomy","authors":"Antonio Pesce, Rosario Lombardo, Antonio Di Cataldo, Gaetano La Greca","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00573-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00573-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Dear Editor</i>,</p><p>We enjoyed reading the article by Toro A et al. [1], in which the authors reported a preliminary experience with a new technique to avoid subtotal cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. We would like to raise some interesting points and comments.</p><p>The authors reported that only three patients have undergone this technique in the last two years; this is a very small sample size for a trauma center service. Moreover, in the results section, the authors stated that “in the last 2 years from January 2019 to December 2021”, but this time interval spans three years, not two.</p><p>The original French technique is characterized by four-ports insertion. We would like to inquire why the authors used three ports in acute cholecystitis, where laparoscopic surgery is undoubtedly more challenging. However, it has been demonstrated that there isn’t any significant clinical benefit in using fewer than four-ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to the standard four-ports approach during elective procedures. In emergency settings, the presence of dense fibrosis and inflammation of the hepatoduodenal ligament, as well as diffuse cholecysto-omental and cholecysto-duodeno-colic adhesions, may hinder proper exposure of the hepatocystic triangle when using only three ports. This increases the risk of iatrogenic biliary, vascular, and visceral injuries. In our opinion, under these specific conditions, the use of a fourth trocar is helpful to pull the gallbladder fundus upwards and facilitate wide exposure of the hepatocystic triangle, ensuring the safe dissection of Calot’s triangle [2]. Moreover, the three ports approach may lead to subsequent medico-legal litigations in case of biliary iatrogenic injuries. Neverthless, while a four-port approach may offer better exposure, particularly in this specific technique and generally in difficult cases, experienced surgeons may opt for a three-port approach if they are confident in their ability to handle challenging intraoperative situations. In such cases as patients with transhepatic percutaneous cholecystostomy, the three-port approach may be useful and sufficient without the need for a fourth trocar. Surgeons should feel empowered to adapt their approach based on intraoperative findings and should not hesitate to add an additional port at any time if they encounter difficulties during dissection.</p><p>Another technical comment is related to trocars’ size: the authors used two 5-mm operative trocars. Using a 5-mm clips applicator on an inflamed and edematous cystic duct in acute cholecystitis can indeed pose some challenges and risks, such as difficulties in performing a reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy where the use of a linear endostapler might be necessary. There is also a risk that the clips may not securely close the cystic duct due to the tissue’s condition, potentially leading to postoperative cystic duct leakage. One important point to emphasize is that the endostap","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143071393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-29DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00568-1
Giacomo Sermonesi, Riccardo Bertelli, Fredric M. Pieracci, Zsolt J. Balogh, Raul Coimbra, Joseph M. Galante, Andreas Hecker, Dieter Weber, Zachary M. Bauman, Susan Kartiko, Bhavik Patel, SarahAnn S. Whitbeck, Thomas W. White, Kevin N. Harrell, Daniele Perrina, Alessia Rampini, Brian Tian, Francesco Amico, Solomon G. Beka, Luigi Bonavina, Marco Ceresoli, Lorenzo Cobianchi, Federico Coccolini, Yunfeng Cui, Francesca Dal Mas, Belinda De Simone, Isidoro Di Carlo, Salomone Di Saverio, Agron Dogjani, Andreas Fette, Gustavo P. Fraga, Carlos Augusto Gomes, Jim S. Khan, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick, Vitor F. Kruger, Ari Leppäniemi, Andrey Litvin, Andrea Mingoli, David Costa Navarro, Eliseo Passera, Michele Pisano, Mauro Podda, Emanuele Russo, Boris Sakakushev, Domenico Santonastaso, Massimo Sartelli, Vishal G. Shelat, Edward Tan, Imtiaz Wani, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Walter L. Biffl, Ian Civil, Rifat Latifi, Ingo Marzi, Edoardo Picetti, Manos Pikoulis, Vanni Agnoletti, Francesca Bravi, Carlo Vall..
<p><b>Correction to: World Journal of Emergency Surgery (2024) 19:33</b></p><p><b>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2</b>.</p><p>The original publication of this article [1] contained an incorrect affiliation for author Imtiaz Wani. The incorrect and correct information is listed in this correction article; the original article has been updated.</p><p>Incorrect</p><p>Imtiaz Wani</p><p>43. Department of Surgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India</p><p>Correct</p><p>Imtiaz Wani</p><p>43. Government Gousia Hospital, Srinagar, India</p><ol data-track-component="outbound reference" data-track-context="references section"><li data-counter="1."><p>Sermonesi G, Bertelli R, Pieracci FM. et al. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2024;19(33). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2.</p></li></ol><p>Download references<svg aria-hidden="true" focusable="false" height="16" role="img" width="16"><use xlink:href="#icon-eds-i-download-medium" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"></use></svg></p><h3>Authors and Affiliations</h3><ol><li><p>Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy</p><p>Giacomo Sermonesi, Riccardo Bertelli, Daniele Perrina, Alessia Rampini, Emanuele Russo, Domenico Santonastaso, Vanni Agnoletti, Carlo Vallicelli & Fausto Catena</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA</p><p>Fredric M. Pieracci & Ernest E. Moore</p></li><li><p>Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia</p><p>Zsolt J. Balogh</p></li><li><p>Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA, USA</p><p>Raul Coimbra</p></li><li><p>Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA</p><p>Joseph M. Galante</p></li><li><p>Emergency Medicine Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany</p><p>Andreas Hecker</p></li><li><p>Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia</p><p>Dieter Weber</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA</p><p>Zachary M. Bauman</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA</p><p>Susan Kartiko</p></li><li><p>Division of Trauma, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD, Australia</p><p>Bhavik Patel</p></li><li><p>Chest Wall Injury Society, Salt Lake City, UT, USA</p><p>SarahAnn S. Whitbeck</p></li><li><p>Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA</p><p>Thomas W. White</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN, USA</p><p>Kevin N. Ha
Correction to:World Journal of Emergency Surgery (2024) 19:33https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2.The 本文[1]最初发表时,作者Imtiaz Wani的单位有误。本更正文章列出了错误和正确的信息;原文已更新。IncorrectImtiaz Wani43.印度斯利那加,Sheri-Kashmir 医学院外科系CorrectImtiaz Wani43.Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper.2024; 19(33). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2.下载参考文献作者和工作单位意大利切塞纳 Maurizio Bufalini 医院普通和急诊外科、麻醉和重症监护室贾科莫-塞莫内西、里卡多-贝尔泰利、达尼埃莱-佩里纳、阿莱西亚-兰皮尼、埃马纽埃尔-鲁索、多梅尼科-桑托纳斯塔索、万尼-阿格诺莱蒂、卡罗-瓦利切利& 福斯托-卡泰纳美国科罗拉多大学医学院外科系美国科罗拉多州丹佛市弗雷德里克-M.Pieracci & Ernest E. Moore澳大利亚新南威尔士州纽卡斯尔市约翰-亨特医院和纽卡斯尔大学创伤学系Zsolt J. Balogh美国加利福尼亚州莫雷诺谷河滨大学卫生系统医疗中心比较效果和临床结果研究中心Aaul Coimbra美国加利福尼亚州萨克拉门托市加利福尼亚大学戴维斯分校外科创伤和急症护理外科Joseph M. Galante美国加利福尼亚州萨克拉门托市加利福尼亚大学戴维斯分校外科创伤和急症护理外科急诊医学系M.Galante德国吉森大学医院普外科和胸外科急诊医学部Andreas Hecker澳大利亚珀斯皇家医院创伤外科Dieter Weber美国内布拉斯加州奥马哈市内布拉斯加大学医学中心外科Zachary M. Bauman美国内布拉斯加州奥马哈市内布拉斯加大学医学中心外科Department of Surgery.BaumanDepartment of Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USASusan KartikoDivision of Trauma, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD, AustraliaBhavik PatelChest Wall Injury Society, Salt Lake City, UT, USASarahAnn S.WhitbeckIntermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USAThomas W. WhiteDepartment of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN, USAKevin N. HarrellDepartment of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, SingaporeBrian TianDiscipline of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, Newcastle, NSW, AustraliaFrancesco AmicoEthiopian Air Force Hospital, Bishoftu, Oromia, EthiopiaSolomon G. BekaDepartment of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.贝卡意大利米兰米兰大学 IRCCS Policlinico San Donato 外科学系路易吉-博纳维纳意大利蒙扎米兰比可卡大学医学和外科学系普通外科和急诊外科马可-切雷索利意大利帕维亚帕维亚大学 Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo 外科学系洛伦佐-科比安奇&;Luca AnsaloniCollegium Medicum, University of Social Sciences, Lodz, PolandLorenzo Cobianchi &;Francesca Dal Mas意大利比萨,比萨大学医院普通、急诊和创伤外科Federico Coccolini天津医科大学南开临床医学院天津南开医院外科,天津、意大利里米尼 Infermi 医院微创急诊和普通外科 Belinda De Simone 外科科学和先进技术系、意大利卡塔尼亚卡塔尼亚大学 Cannizzaro 医院普外科Isidoro Di Carlo 意大利马尔凯大区圣贝内德托德尔特龙托医院普外科Salomone Di Saverio 地拉那医科大学普外科阿尔巴尼亚地拉那Agron DogjaniPediatric Surgery,Children's Care Center,SRH Klinikum Suhl,Suhl,Thueringen,GermanyAndreas FetteDivision of Trauma Surgery,School of Medical Sciences,University of Campinas,Campinas,BrazilGustavo P.Fraga & Vitor F. KrugerFaculdade de Medicina, SUPREMA, Hospital Universitario Terezinha de Jesus de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, BrazilCarlos Augusto GomesDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UKJim S. KhanDepartments of Surgery and Countermanship, Portsmouth, UKJim S. KrugerFaculdade de Medicina, SUPREMA.KirkpatrickAbdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandAri LeppäniemiDepartment of Surgical Diseases No.
{"title":"Correction: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper","authors":"Giacomo Sermonesi, Riccardo Bertelli, Fredric M. Pieracci, Zsolt J. Balogh, Raul Coimbra, Joseph M. Galante, Andreas Hecker, Dieter Weber, Zachary M. Bauman, Susan Kartiko, Bhavik Patel, SarahAnn S. Whitbeck, Thomas W. White, Kevin N. Harrell, Daniele Perrina, Alessia Rampini, Brian Tian, Francesco Amico, Solomon G. Beka, Luigi Bonavina, Marco Ceresoli, Lorenzo Cobianchi, Federico Coccolini, Yunfeng Cui, Francesca Dal Mas, Belinda De Simone, Isidoro Di Carlo, Salomone Di Saverio, Agron Dogjani, Andreas Fette, Gustavo P. Fraga, Carlos Augusto Gomes, Jim S. Khan, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick, Vitor F. Kruger, Ari Leppäniemi, Andrey Litvin, Andrea Mingoli, David Costa Navarro, Eliseo Passera, Michele Pisano, Mauro Podda, Emanuele Russo, Boris Sakakushev, Domenico Santonastaso, Massimo Sartelli, Vishal G. Shelat, Edward Tan, Imtiaz Wani, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Walter L. Biffl, Ian Civil, Rifat Latifi, Ingo Marzi, Edoardo Picetti, Manos Pikoulis, Vanni Agnoletti, Francesca Bravi, Carlo Vall..","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00568-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00568-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Correction to: World Journal of Emergency Surgery (2024) 19:33</b></p><p><b>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2</b>.</p><p>The original publication of this article [1] contained an incorrect affiliation for author Imtiaz Wani. The incorrect and correct information is listed in this correction article; the original article has been updated.</p><p>Incorrect</p><p>Imtiaz Wani</p><p>43. Department of Surgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India</p><p>Correct</p><p>Imtiaz Wani</p><p>43. Government Gousia Hospital, Srinagar, India</p><ol data-track-component=\"outbound reference\" data-track-context=\"references section\"><li data-counter=\"1.\"><p>Sermonesi G, Bertelli R, Pieracci FM. et al. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2024;19(33). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2.</p></li></ol><p>Download references<svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-download-medium\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></p><h3>Authors and Affiliations</h3><ol><li><p>Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy</p><p>Giacomo Sermonesi, Riccardo Bertelli, Daniele Perrina, Alessia Rampini, Emanuele Russo, Domenico Santonastaso, Vanni Agnoletti, Carlo Vallicelli & Fausto Catena</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA</p><p>Fredric M. Pieracci & Ernest E. Moore</p></li><li><p>Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia</p><p>Zsolt J. Balogh</p></li><li><p>Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA, USA</p><p>Raul Coimbra</p></li><li><p>Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA</p><p>Joseph M. Galante</p></li><li><p>Emergency Medicine Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany</p><p>Andreas Hecker</p></li><li><p>Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia</p><p>Dieter Weber</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA</p><p>Zachary M. Bauman</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA</p><p>Susan Kartiko</p></li><li><p>Division of Trauma, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD, Australia</p><p>Bhavik Patel</p></li><li><p>Chest Wall Injury Society, Salt Lake City, UT, USA</p><p>SarahAnn S. Whitbeck</p></li><li><p>Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA</p><p>Thomas W. White</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN, USA</p><p>Kevin N. Ha","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143054997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-27DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00569-0
Chien-Hung Liao, David A. Spain, Chih-Chi Chen, Chi-Tung Cheng, Wei-Cheng Lin, Dong-Ru Ho, Heng-Fu Lin, Fausto Catena
Intrabdominal pressure (IAP) is an important parameter. Elevated IAP can reduce visceral perfusion, lead to intraabdominal hypertension, and result in life-threatening abdominal compartment syndrome. While ingestible capsular devices have been used for various abdominal diagnoses, their application in continuous IAP monitoring remains unproven. We conducted a prospective clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of IAP measurement using a digital capsule PressureDOT, an ingestible capsule equipped with wireless transmission capability and a pressure sensor, then compared its reliability with conventional intravesical method. Patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic surgeries were recruited. During surgery, we created pneumoperitoneum by inflating CO2 into the peritoneal cavity and IAP was simultaneously monitored using both the ingestible capsules and intravesical measurements from Foley catheter. We assessed the feasibility of signal transmission and the accuracy of pressure measurements. Six patients were enrolled in this pilot study. No adverse events were reported, and the average first-intake time was within 24 h. All capsules were successfully expelled, with an average excretion time of 81 h. In the summarized data, the mean IAPdot is 0.6 mmHg lower than the IAPivp, with a standard deviation of 1.68 mmHg. However, capsule measurements showed excellent correlation with intravesical IAP measurements, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.916 (95% CI: 0.8821–0.9320). Our study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of using digital capsules for continuous IAP monitoring, providing the agreement between IAP measurements from digital capsules and conventional intravesical measurement within a near-normal pressure.
{"title":"Feasibility and accuracy of continuous intraabdominal pressure monitoring with a capsular device in human pilot trial","authors":"Chien-Hung Liao, David A. Spain, Chih-Chi Chen, Chi-Tung Cheng, Wei-Cheng Lin, Dong-Ru Ho, Heng-Fu Lin, Fausto Catena","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00569-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00569-0","url":null,"abstract":"Intrabdominal pressure (IAP) is an important parameter. Elevated IAP can reduce visceral perfusion, lead to intraabdominal hypertension, and result in life-threatening abdominal compartment syndrome. While ingestible capsular devices have been used for various abdominal diagnoses, their application in continuous IAP monitoring remains unproven. We conducted a prospective clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of IAP measurement using a digital capsule PressureDOT, an ingestible capsule equipped with wireless transmission capability and a pressure sensor, then compared its reliability with conventional intravesical method. Patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic surgeries were recruited. During surgery, we created pneumoperitoneum by inflating CO2 into the peritoneal cavity and IAP was simultaneously monitored using both the ingestible capsules and intravesical measurements from Foley catheter. We assessed the feasibility of signal transmission and the accuracy of pressure measurements. Six patients were enrolled in this pilot study. No adverse events were reported, and the average first-intake time was within 24 h. All capsules were successfully expelled, with an average excretion time of 81 h. In the summarized data, the mean IAPdot is 0.6 mmHg lower than the IAPivp, with a standard deviation of 1.68 mmHg. However, capsule measurements showed excellent correlation with intravesical IAP measurements, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.916 (95% CI: 0.8821–0.9320). Our study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of using digital capsules for continuous IAP monitoring, providing the agreement between IAP measurements from digital capsules and conventional intravesical measurement within a near-normal pressure.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143044100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-23DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00580-z
Hassan Elbiss, Shamsa Al Awar, Jamal Koteesh, Howaida Khair, Sara Maki, Dana H. Abdalla, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the leading preventable causes of maternal morbidity and mortality causing one-fourth of all maternal deaths. We aimed to study the role of uterine artery embolization (UAE) in controlling PPH and its impact on the need for hysterectomy. We studied patients who were diagnosed with primary PPH between February 2012 and March 2020 at Al Ain Hospital, United Arab Emirates. We studied the characteristics and outcomes of those undergoing interventional radiology via UAE. Logistic regression analysis was done to define the factors that predict the need for emergency UAE. Out of 79 patients who had elective (n = 53) or emergency (n = 26) embolization, the placenta previa accreta (69.8% vs. 23.1%) and placenta previa (24.4% vs. 3.8%) were the common indications for elective versus emergency UAE (p < 0.001). The indication for UAE was the most significant factor for predicting an emergency procedure (p = 0.002) with placenta previa being significantly different from other indications (p < 0.001). Bleeding stopped in 78/79 patients (success rate of 98.7%) following UAE. Those who failed stopping of the bleeding were similar between the elective and emergency IR, (1/53 (1.9%) compared with 0/26 (0%), p = 0.99 Fisher’s Exact test). Overall, eight patients (10%) had hysterectomy, one of them was needed as the final solution to stop bleeding. There were no maternal deaths. Interventional radiological UAE is very efficient in controlling postpartum hemorrhage. It should be recommended as the first line of treatment for significant bleeding when expertise and facilities are available. It increases survival, reduces hysterectomy rate, without a difference if done as an emergency or elective procedure.
{"title":"Uterine artery embolization in the management of postpartum hemorrhage","authors":"Hassan Elbiss, Shamsa Al Awar, Jamal Koteesh, Howaida Khair, Sara Maki, Dana H. Abdalla, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00580-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00580-z","url":null,"abstract":"Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the leading preventable causes of maternal morbidity and mortality causing one-fourth of all maternal deaths. We aimed to study the role of uterine artery embolization (UAE) in controlling PPH and its impact on the need for hysterectomy. We studied patients who were diagnosed with primary PPH between February 2012 and March 2020 at Al Ain Hospital, United Arab Emirates. We studied the characteristics and outcomes of those undergoing interventional radiology via UAE. Logistic regression analysis was done to define the factors that predict the need for emergency UAE. Out of 79 patients who had elective (n = 53) or emergency (n = 26) embolization, the placenta previa accreta (69.8% vs. 23.1%) and placenta previa (24.4% vs. 3.8%) were the common indications for elective versus emergency UAE (p < 0.001). The indication for UAE was the most significant factor for predicting an emergency procedure (p = 0.002) with placenta previa being significantly different from other indications (p < 0.001). Bleeding stopped in 78/79 patients (success rate of 98.7%) following UAE. Those who failed stopping of the bleeding were similar between the elective and emergency IR, (1/53 (1.9%) compared with 0/26 (0%), p = 0.99 Fisher’s Exact test). Overall, eight patients (10%) had hysterectomy, one of them was needed as the final solution to stop bleeding. There were no maternal deaths. Interventional radiological UAE is very efficient in controlling postpartum hemorrhage. It should be recommended as the first line of treatment for significant bleeding when expertise and facilities are available. It increases survival, reduces hysterectomy rate, without a difference if done as an emergency or elective procedure.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143020690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-20DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00578-7
Jin Young Lee, Seheon Kim, Jin Bong Ye, Jin Suk Lee, Younghoon Sul
Trauma surgery is a fundamental aspect of medicine. According to the 2023 mortality report from Statistics Korea, external factors such as intentional self-harm and transportation incidents are leading causes of death among individuals aged 10 to 30, accounting for 7.9% of overall mortality. Despite advances in the field, specialization has hindered comprehensive trauma care. In South Korea, regional trauma centers have been established to meet critical trauma management needs; however, challenges remain, including a shortage of trauma surgeons and inefficient resource utilization. The reluctance of surgical residents to pursue trauma training exacerbates the scarcity of qualified specialists. Trauma surgeons often bear extensive responsibilities, which limits their ability to perform prompt interventions. Acute Care Surgery (ACS) offers a model to integrate trauma and non-trauma surgical care, enabling hospitals to implement effective protocols for urgent cases and improving patient outcomes. Research indicates that ACS enhances emergency surgical management, increases training opportunities for residents, and improves job satisfaction among participating surgeons. Integrating ACS into South Korea’s healthcare system is essential to optimize resource allocation and improve emergency care, ultimately leading to enhanced public health outcomes.
{"title":"Integrating acute care surgery in South Korea: enhancing trauma and non-trauma emergency care","authors":"Jin Young Lee, Seheon Kim, Jin Bong Ye, Jin Suk Lee, Younghoon Sul","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00578-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00578-7","url":null,"abstract":"Trauma surgery is a fundamental aspect of medicine. According to the 2023 mortality report from Statistics Korea, external factors such as intentional self-harm and transportation incidents are leading causes of death among individuals aged 10 to 30, accounting for 7.9% of overall mortality. Despite advances in the field, specialization has hindered comprehensive trauma care. In South Korea, regional trauma centers have been established to meet critical trauma management needs; however, challenges remain, including a shortage of trauma surgeons and inefficient resource utilization. The reluctance of surgical residents to pursue trauma training exacerbates the scarcity of qualified specialists. Trauma surgeons often bear extensive responsibilities, which limits their ability to perform prompt interventions. Acute Care Surgery (ACS) offers a model to integrate trauma and non-trauma surgical care, enabling hospitals to implement effective protocols for urgent cases and improving patient outcomes. Research indicates that ACS enhances emergency surgical management, increases training opportunities for residents, and improves job satisfaction among participating surgeons. Integrating ACS into South Korea’s healthcare system is essential to optimize resource allocation and improve emergency care, ultimately leading to enhanced public health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142990061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-10DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00576-9
Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi, Arda Isik, Fausto Rosa, Diego Visconti, Taras Nechay, Sharfuddin Chowdhury, Abdourahmane Ndong, Tushar S. Mishra, Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi, Francesco Piscioneri, Edward C.T.H. Tan
Around five billion people globally lack access to safe, timely, and affordable surgical facilities and care in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Global initiatives have been launched, including efforts led by organizations. Also, regional efforts have shed light on the unique challenges faced by different areas within LMICs. Despite these efforts, many countries still face significant challenges, including inadequate infrastructure, limited availability of trained surgical personnel, lack of essential medical equipment, and insufficient financial resources allocated to healthcare and their related possible factors. Here is that we aim to identify the progress made in areas such as capacity building, training programs, infrastructure development, and policy reforms, as well as highlight the gaps that persist, providing a foundation for future research. Such a comprehensive scoping review will be crucial to enhance surgical care services and ultimately improve health outcomes in LMICs. A comprehensive literature search up to November 2024 will be conducted across six major databases. PubMed, Scopus, Ovoid, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) database. The methodology will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. The first version of this project will not include a quality appraisal.
在低收入和中等收入国家,全球约有50亿人无法获得安全、及时和负担得起的手术设施和护理。全球倡议已经启动,包括由各组织领导的努力。此外,区域努力揭示了中低收入国家不同地区面临的独特挑战。尽管作出了这些努力,但许多国家仍然面临重大挑战,包括基础设施不足、训练有素的外科人员有限、缺乏基本医疗设备、分配给保健及其相关可能因素的财政资源不足。我们的目标是确定在能力建设、培训计划、基础设施发展和政策改革等领域取得的进展,并强调仍然存在的差距,为未来的研究奠定基础。这种全面的范围审查对于加强外科护理服务并最终改善中低收入国家的健康结果至关重要。截止到2024年11月,将在6个主要数据库中进行全面的文献检索。PubMed、Scopus、Ovoid、Web of Science、Cochrane Central、CNKI数据库。方法将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)清单的首选报告项目。这个项目的第一个版本将不包括质量评估。
{"title":"Global perspectives in acute and emergency general surgery in low and middle-income countries: a WSES project protocol for scoping review on global surgery","authors":"Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi, Arda Isik, Fausto Rosa, Diego Visconti, Taras Nechay, Sharfuddin Chowdhury, Abdourahmane Ndong, Tushar S. Mishra, Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi, Francesco Piscioneri, Edward C.T.H. Tan","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00576-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00576-9","url":null,"abstract":"Around five billion people globally lack access to safe, timely, and affordable surgical facilities and care in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Global initiatives have been launched, including efforts led by organizations. Also, regional efforts have shed light on the unique challenges faced by different areas within LMICs. Despite these efforts, many countries still face significant challenges, including inadequate infrastructure, limited availability of trained surgical personnel, lack of essential medical equipment, and insufficient financial resources allocated to healthcare and their related possible factors. Here is that we aim to identify the progress made in areas such as capacity building, training programs, infrastructure development, and policy reforms, as well as highlight the gaps that persist, providing a foundation for future research. Such a comprehensive scoping review will be crucial to enhance surgical care services and ultimately improve health outcomes in LMICs. A comprehensive literature search up to November 2024 will be conducted across six major databases. PubMed, Scopus, Ovoid, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) database. The methodology will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. The first version of this project will not include a quality appraisal.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142940300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-10DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00574-x
Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Isabella Van-Londoño, Antonio Pesce
Empirical antibiotic therapy is often initiated during the hospital stay while awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This approach is generally justified in patients with moderate (Tokyo II) and severe (Tokyo III) acute cholecystitis, where organ dysfunction occurs as a result of the inflammatory or infectious process. However, there is no clear consensus regarding the use of antibiotics in patients with mild (Tokyo I) cholecystitis. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative antibiotic use on outcomes in patients with acute cholecystitis. A systematic review of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane was conducted following the PRISMA methodology. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies evaluating the use or non-use of preoperative antibiotics in patients with acute cholecystitis. Eligible studies were required to provide at least one of the following datasets: postoperative complication rate, postoperative infectious complication rate, or positive culture rate. The synthesis reports were prepared using the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) framework. A total of 622 articles were initially identified, of which 2 met the inclusion criteria. These two articles included 331 patients. They reported higher rates of postoperative complications and bacterobilia in the group that received preoperative antibiotics; however, the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Based on current evidence, no recommendation can be made regarding the therapeutic use of antibiotics in mild acute cholecystitis while awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
{"title":"Pre-operative antibiotics in patients with acute mild cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it really useful? A systematic review","authors":"Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Isabella Van-Londoño, Antonio Pesce","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00574-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00574-x","url":null,"abstract":"Empirical antibiotic therapy is often initiated during the hospital stay while awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This approach is generally justified in patients with moderate (Tokyo II) and severe (Tokyo III) acute cholecystitis, where organ dysfunction occurs as a result of the inflammatory or infectious process. However, there is no clear consensus regarding the use of antibiotics in patients with mild (Tokyo I) cholecystitis. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative antibiotic use on outcomes in patients with acute cholecystitis. A systematic review of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane was conducted following the PRISMA methodology. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies evaluating the use or non-use of preoperative antibiotics in patients with acute cholecystitis. Eligible studies were required to provide at least one of the following datasets: postoperative complication rate, postoperative infectious complication rate, or positive culture rate. The synthesis reports were prepared using the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) framework. A total of 622 articles were initially identified, of which 2 met the inclusion criteria. These two articles included 331 patients. They reported higher rates of postoperative complications and bacterobilia in the group that received preoperative antibiotics; however, the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Based on current evidence, no recommendation can be made regarding the therapeutic use of antibiotics in mild acute cholecystitis while awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142940358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-07DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00572-5
Charles Dupuy, Thibault Martinez, Olivier Duranteau, Tobias Gauss, Natacha Kapandji, Jean Pasqueron, Mathilde Holleville, Georges Abi Abdallah, Anatole Harrois, Véronique Ramonda, Delphine Huet-Garrigue, Théophane Doublet, Marc Leone, Vincent Legros, Julien Pottecher, Gérard Audibert, Ingrid Millot, Benjamin Popoff, Benjamin Cohen, Fanny Vardon-Bounes, Mathieu Willig, Pierre Gosset, Emilie Angles, Nouchan Mellati, Nicolas Higel, Mathieu Boutonnet, Pierre Pasquier
To reduce the number of deaths caused by exsanguination, the initial management of severe trauma aims to prevent, if not limit, the lethal triad, which consists of acidosis, coagulopathy, and hypothermia. Recently, several studies have suggested adding hypocalcemia to the lethal triad to form the lethal diamond, but the evidence supporting this change is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the lethal triad and lethal diamond for their respective associations with 24-h mortality in severe trauma patients receiving transfusion. We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients in TraumaBase®, a French database (2011–2023). The patients included in this study were all trauma patients who had received transfusions of at least 1 unit of red blood cells (RBCs) within the first 6 h of hospital admission and for whom ionized calcium measurements were available. Hypocalcemia was defined as an ionized calcium level < 1.1 mmol/L. A total of 2141 severe trauma patients were included (median age: 39, interquartile range [IQR]: 26–57; median injury severity score: 27, IQR: 17–41). Patients primarily presented with blunt trauma (81.7%), and a 24-h mortality rate of 16.1% was observed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed no significant difference in the association with 24-h mortality between the lethal diamond (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.71) and the lethal triad (AUC: 0.72) (p = 0.26). The strength of the association with 24-h mortality was similar between the lethal triad and the lethal diamond, with Cramer’s V values of 0.29 and 0.28, respectively. This study revealed no significant difference between the lethal triad and the lethal diamond in terms of their respective associations with 24-h mortality in severe trauma patients requiring transfusion. These results raise questions about the independent role of hypocalcemia in early mortality.
{"title":"Comparison of the lethal triad and the lethal diamond in severe trauma patients: a multicenter cohort","authors":"Charles Dupuy, Thibault Martinez, Olivier Duranteau, Tobias Gauss, Natacha Kapandji, Jean Pasqueron, Mathilde Holleville, Georges Abi Abdallah, Anatole Harrois, Véronique Ramonda, Delphine Huet-Garrigue, Théophane Doublet, Marc Leone, Vincent Legros, Julien Pottecher, Gérard Audibert, Ingrid Millot, Benjamin Popoff, Benjamin Cohen, Fanny Vardon-Bounes, Mathieu Willig, Pierre Gosset, Emilie Angles, Nouchan Mellati, Nicolas Higel, Mathieu Boutonnet, Pierre Pasquier","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00572-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00572-5","url":null,"abstract":"To reduce the number of deaths caused by exsanguination, the initial management of severe trauma aims to prevent, if not limit, the lethal triad, which consists of acidosis, coagulopathy, and hypothermia. Recently, several studies have suggested adding hypocalcemia to the lethal triad to form the lethal diamond, but the evidence supporting this change is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the lethal triad and lethal diamond for their respective associations with 24-h mortality in severe trauma patients receiving transfusion. We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients in TraumaBase®, a French database (2011–2023). The patients included in this study were all trauma patients who had received transfusions of at least 1 unit of red blood cells (RBCs) within the first 6 h of hospital admission and for whom ionized calcium measurements were available. Hypocalcemia was defined as an ionized calcium level < 1.1 mmol/L. A total of 2141 severe trauma patients were included (median age: 39, interquartile range [IQR]: 26–57; median injury severity score: 27, IQR: 17–41). Patients primarily presented with blunt trauma (81.7%), and a 24-h mortality rate of 16.1% was observed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed no significant difference in the association with 24-h mortality between the lethal diamond (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.71) and the lethal triad (AUC: 0.72) (p = 0.26). The strength of the association with 24-h mortality was similar between the lethal triad and the lethal diamond, with Cramer’s V values of 0.29 and 0.28, respectively. This study revealed no significant difference between the lethal triad and the lethal diamond in terms of their respective associations with 24-h mortality in severe trauma patients requiring transfusion. These results raise questions about the independent role of hypocalcemia in early mortality.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142934875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}