Biodata Mining最新文献

Background and objective: Accurate identification and prioritization of driver-mutations in cancer is critical for effective patient management. Despite the presence of numerous bioinformatic algorithms for estimating mutation pathogenicity, there is significant variation in their assessments. This inconsistency is evident even for well-established cancer driver mutations. This study aims to develop an ensemble machine learning approach to evaluate the performance (rank) of pathogenic and conservation scoring algorithms (PCSAs) based on their ability to distinguish pathogenic driver mutations from benign passenger (non-driver) mutations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC).

Methods: The study used a dataset from 502 HNSC patients, classifying mutations based on 299 known high-confidence cancer driver genes. Missense somatic mutations in driver genes were treated as driver mutations, while non-driver mutations were randomly selected from other genes. Each mutation was annotated with 41 PCSAs. Three machine learning algorithms-logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machine-along with recursive feature elimination, were used to rank these PCSAs. The final ranking of the PCSAs was determined using rank-average-sort and rank-sum-sort methods.

Results: The random forest algorithm emerged as the top performer among the three tested ML algorithms, with an AUC-ROC of 0.89, compared to 0.83 for the other two, in distinguishing pathogenic driver mutations from benign passenger mutations using all 41 PCSAs. The top 11 PCSAs were selected based on the first quintile cut-off from the final rank-sum distribution. Classifiers built using these top 11 PCSAs (DEOGEN2, Integrated_fitCons, MVP, etc.) demonstrated significantly higher performance (p-value < 2.22e-16) compared to those using the remaining 30 PCSAs across all three ML algorithms, in separating pathogenic driver from benign passenger mutations. The top PCSAs demonstrated strong performance on a validation cohort including independent HNSC and other cancer types: breast, lung, and colorectal - reflecting its consistency, robustness and generalizability.

Conclusions: The ensemble machine learning approach effectively evaluates the performance of PCSAs based on their ability to differentiate pathogenic drivers from benign passenger mutations in HNSC and other cancer types. Notably, some well-known PCSAs performed poorly, underscoring the importance of data-driven selection over relying solely on popularity.

Background: The mechanistic pathways that give rise to the extreme symptoms exhibited by rare disease patients are complex, heterogeneous, and difficult to discern. Understanding these mechanisms is critical for developing treatments that address the underlying causes of diseases rather than merely the presenting symptoms. Moreover, the same dysfunctional series of interrelated symptoms implicated in rare recessive diseases may also lead to milder and potentially preventable symptoms in carriers in the general population. Seizures are a common and extreme phenotype that can result from diverse and often elusive pathways in patients with ultrarare or undiagnosed disorders.

Methods: In this pilot study, we present an approach to understand the underlying pathways leading to seizures in patients from the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) by analyzing aggregated genotype and phenotype data from the UK Biobank (UKB). Specifically, we look for enriched phenotypes across UKB participants who harbor rare variants in the same gene known or suspected to be causally implicated in a UDN patient's recessively manifesting disorder. Analyzing these milder but related associated phenotypes in UKB participants can provide insight into the disease-causing mechanisms at play in rare disease UDN patients.

Results: We present six vignettes of undiagnosed patients experiencing seizures as part of their recessive genetic condition. For each patient, we analyze a gene of interest: MPO, P2RX7, SQSTM1, COL27A1, PIGQ, or CACNA2D2, and find relevant symptoms associated with UKB participants. We discuss the potential mechanisms by which the digestive, skeletal, circulatory, and immune system abnormalities found in the UKB patients may contribute to the severe presentations exhibited by UDN patients. We find that in our set of rare disease patients, seizures may result from diverse, multi-step pathways that involve multiple body systems.

Conclusions: Analyses of large-scale population cohorts such as the UKB can be a critical tool to further our understanding of rare diseases in general. Continued research in this area could lead to more precise diagnostics and personalized treatment strategies for patients with rare and undiagnosed conditions.

Background: Understanding the molecular properties of chemical compounds is essential for identifying potential candidates or ensuring safety in drug discovery. However, exploring the vast chemical space is time-consuming and costly, necessitating the development of time-efficient and cost-effective computational methods. Recent advances in deep learning approaches have offered deeper insights into molecular structures. Leveraging this progress, we developed a novel multi-view learning model.

Results: We introduce a graph-integrated model that captures both local and global structural features of chemical compounds. In our model, graph attention layers are employed to effectively capture essential local structures by jointly considering atom and bond features, while multi-head attention layers extract important global features. We evaluated our model on nine MoleculeNet datasets, encompassing both classification and regression tasks, and compared its performance with state-of-the-art methods. Our model achieved an average area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.822 and a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 1.133, representing a 3% improvement in AUROC and a 7% improvement in RMSE over state-of-the-art models in extensive seed testing.

Conclusion: MultiChem highlights the importance of integrating both local and global structural information in predicting molecular properties, while also assessing the stability of the models across multiple datasets using various random seed values.

Implementation: The codes are available at https://github.com/DMnBI/MultiChem .

Background: With recent advances in single cell technology, high-throughput methods provide unique insight into disease mechanisms and more importantly, cell type origin. Here, we used multi-omics data to understand how genetic variants from genome-wide association studies influence development of disease. We show in principle how to use genetic algorithms with normal, matching pairs of single-nucleus RNA- and ATAC-seq, genome annotations, and protein-protein interaction data to describe the genes and cell types collectively and their contribution to increased risk.

Results: We used genetic algorithms to measure fitness of gene-cell set proposals against a series of objective functions that capture data and annotations. The highest information objective function captured protein-protein interactions. We observed significantly greater fitness scores and subgraph sizes in foreground vs. matching sets of control variants. Furthermore, our model reliably identified known targets and ligand-receptor pairs, consistent with prior studies.

Conclusions: Our findings suggested that application of genetic algorithms to association studies can generate a coherent cellular model of risk from a set of susceptibility variants. Further, we showed, using breast cancer as an example, that such variants have a greater number of physical interactions than expected due to chance.

Biomedical datasets are the mainstays of computational biology and health informatics projects, and can be found on multiple data platforms online or obtained from wet-lab biologists and physicians. The quality and the trustworthiness of these datasets, however, can sometimes be poor, producing bad results in turn, which can harm patients and data subjects. To address this problem, policy-makers, researchers, and consortia have proposed diverse regulations, guidelines, and scores to assess the quality and increase the reliability of datasets. Although generally useful, however, they are often incomplete and impractical. The guidelines of Datasheets for Datasets, in particular, are too numerous; the requirements of the Kaggle Dataset Usability Score focus on non-scientific requisites (for example, including a cover image); and the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) sets forth sparse and general data governance requirements, which we tailored to datasets for biomedical AI. Against this backdrop, we introduce our new Venus score to assess the data quality and trustworthiness of biomedical datasets. Our score ranges from 0 to 10 and consists of ten questions that anyone developing a bioinformatics, medical informatics, or cheminformatics dataset should answer before the release. In this study, we first describe the EU AI Act, Datasheets for Datasets, and the Kaggle Dataset Usability Score, presenting their requirements and their drawbacks. To do so, we reverse-engineer the weights of the influential Kaggle Score for the first time and report them in this study. We distill the most important data governance requirements into ten questions tailored to the biomedical domain, comprising the Venus score. We apply the Venus score to twelve datasets from multiple subdomains, including electronic health records, medical imaging, microarray and bulk RNA-seq gene expression, cheminformatics, physiologic electrogram signals, and medical text. Analyzing the results, we surface fine-grained strengths and weaknesses of popular datasets, as well as aggregate trends. Most notably, we find a widespread tendency to gloss over sources of data inaccuracy and noise, which may hinder the reliable exploitation of data and, consequently, research results. Overall, our results confirm the applicability and utility of the Venus score to assess the trustworthiness of biomedical data.

This survey explores the transformative impact of foundation models (FMs) in artificial intelligence, focusing on their integration with federated learning (FL) in biomedical research. Foundation models such as ChatGPT, LLaMa, and CLIP, which are trained on vast datasets through methods including unsupervised pretraining, self-supervised learning, instructed fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning from human feedback, represent significant advancements in machine learning. These models, with their ability to generate coherent text and realistic images, are crucial for biomedical applications that require processing diverse data forms such as clinical reports, diagnostic images, and multimodal patient interactions. The incorporation of FL with these sophisticated models presents a promising strategy to harness their analytical power while safeguarding the privacy of sensitive medical data. This approach not only enhances the capabilities of FMs in medical diagnostics and personalized treatment but also addresses critical concerns about data privacy and security in healthcare. This survey reviews the current applications of FMs in federated settings, underscores the challenges, and identifies future research directions including scaling FMs, managing data diversity, and enhancing communication efficiency within FL frameworks. The objective is to encourage further research into the combined potential of FMs and FL, laying the groundwork for healthcare innovations.

Background: Epistasis, the phenomenon where the effect of one gene (or variant) is masked or modified by one or more other genes, significantly contributes to the phenotypic variance of complex traits. Traditionally, epistasis has been modeled using the Cartesian epistatic model, a multiplicative approach based on standard statistical regression. However, a recent study investigating epistasis in obesity-related traits has identified potential limitations of the Cartesian epistatic model, revealing that it likely only detects a fraction of the genetic interactions occurring in natural systems. In contrast, the exclusive-or (XOR) epistatic model has shown promise in detecting a broader range of epistatic interactions and revealing more biologically relevant functions associated with interacting variants. To investigate whether the XOR epistatic model also forms distinct network structures compared to the Cartesian model, we applied network science to examine genetic interactions underlying body mass index (BMI) in rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Results: Our comparative analysis of XOR and Cartesian epistatic models in rats reveals distinct topological characteristics. The XOR model exhibits enhanced sensitivity to epistatic interactions between the network communities found in the Cartesian epistatic network, facilitating the identification of novel trait-related biological functions via community-based enrichment analysis. Additionally, the XOR network features triangle network motifs, indicative of higher-order epistatic interactions. This research also evaluates the impact of linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based edge pruning on network-based epistasis analysis, finding that LD-based edge pruning may lead to increased network fragmentation, which may hinder the effectiveness of network analysis for the investigation of epistasis. We confirmed through network permutation analysis that most XOR and Cartesian epistatic networks derived from the data display distinct structural properties compared to randomly shuffled networks.

Conclusions: Collectively, these findings highlight the XOR model's ability to uncover meaningful biological associations and higher-order epistasis derived from lower-order network topologies. The introduction of community-based enrichment analysis and motif-based epistatic discovery emphasize network science as a critical approach for advancing epistasis research and understanding complex genetic architectures.

Pathway analysis is a powerful approach for elucidating insights from gene expression data and associating such changes with cellular phenotypes. The overarching objective of pathway research is to identify critical molecular drivers within a cellular context and uncover novel signaling networks from groups of relevant biomolecules. In this work, we present PathSingle, a Python-based pathway analysis tool tailored for single-cell data analysis. PathSingle employs a unique graph-based algorithm to enable the classification of diverse cellular states, such as T cell subtypes. Designed to be open-source, extensible, and computationally efficient, PathSingle is available at https://github.com/zurkin1/PathSingle under the MIT license. This tool provides researchers with a versatile framework for uncovering biologically meaningful insights from high-dimensional single-cell transcriptomics data, facilitating a deeper understanding of cellular regulation and function.