首页 > 最新文献

Social Science & Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Exploring heuristics and assessing their impact in discrete choice experiments: a proof-of-principle 探索启发式并评估其在离散选择实验中的影响:原理证明。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119044
Stella M. Marceta , Nicholas V.R. Smeele , Joffre D. Swait , Jorien Veldwijk

Objectives

Using Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs), healthcare researchers can model population, patient, staff or provider preferences and choices. DCEs are rooted in Random Utility Theory (RUT), assuming that respondents are fully rational and process all provided information when choosing the alternative that maximizes their attribute-based utility. However, these behavioral premises do not always reflect observed behavior in choice experiments. The often complex, uncertain, and emotion-laden choice scenarios in health contexts can prompt heuristic-based simplifications, violating RUT assumptions. Although heuristics are recognized as behavioral violations relative to the normative RUT-based perspective, their impact is rarely modeled and limited guidance exists on how to do so.

Methods

Using three existing DCE studies, we demonstrate how researchers can identify and assess the impact of common RUT-violating heuristics in applied DCE studies. A structured interview guide and rating instrument were developed to identify heuristics a priori, based on clinician and researcher input. Latent-Class Models with restricted parameters were pre-specified to estimate heuristic impacts vis-à-vis preference heterogeneity.

Results

Our sensitivity analyses showed that up to 22% of the respondents likely applied particular heuristics. This impacted study results: For example, accounting for dominant decision-making (i.e., a class in which respondents ignored any attributes other than the risk of side effects), increased respondents’ average willingness-to-pay for antibiotics with a low contribution to antibiotic resistance by 15,63 Euros per treatment.

Conclusions

Ignoring heuristics that violate RUT assumptions biases preference estimates, marginal rates of substitution and uptake predictions in DCEs. We recommend assessing the likely presence and impact of heuristics in sensitivity analyses of future DCEs to ensure robustness and accuracy of results.
目的:使用离散选择实验(DCEs),医疗保健研究人员可以模拟人群、患者、工作人员或提供者的偏好和选择。dce根植于随机效用理论(RUT),假设受访者是完全理性的,并在选择最大化其基于属性的效用的替代方案时处理所有提供的信息。然而,这些行为前提并不总是反映选择实验中观察到的行为。在健康环境中,通常复杂、不确定和充满情感的选择场景会促使基于启发式的简化,违反常规假设。尽管启发式被认为是相对于规范的基于rut的观点的行为违规,但它们的影响很少被建模,并且关于如何这样做的指导也很有限。方法:利用三项现有的DCE研究,我们展示了研究人员如何识别和评估在应用DCE研究中常见的违反rut的启发式方法的影响。基于临床医生和研究人员的输入,开发了一个结构化的访谈指南和评级工具来识别先验的启发式。预先指定具有受限参数的潜在类模型,以估计对-à-vis偏好异质性的启发式影响。结果:我们的敏感性分析表明,多达22%的受访者可能应用特定的启发式。这影响了研究结果:例如,考虑到主导决策(即,应答者忽略副作用风险以外的任何属性的类别),应答者对抗生素耐药性贡献较低的抗生素的平均支付意愿增加了15.63欧元。结论:忽略违反RUT假设的启发式方法会影响dce的偏好估计、边际替代率和摄取预测。我们建议在未来dce的敏感性分析中评估启发式的可能存在和影响,以确保结果的稳健性和准确性。
{"title":"Exploring heuristics and assessing their impact in discrete choice experiments: a proof-of-principle","authors":"Stella M. Marceta ,&nbsp;Nicholas V.R. Smeele ,&nbsp;Joffre D. Swait ,&nbsp;Jorien Veldwijk","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119044","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119044","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Using Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs), healthcare researchers can model population, patient, staff or provider preferences and choices. DCEs are rooted in Random Utility Theory (RUT), assuming that respondents are fully rational and process all provided information when choosing the alternative that maximizes their attribute-based utility. However, these behavioral premises do not always reflect observed behavior in choice experiments. The often complex, uncertain, and emotion-laden choice scenarios in health contexts can prompt heuristic-based simplifications, violating RUT assumptions. Although heuristics are recognized as behavioral violations relative to the normative RUT-based perspective, their impact is rarely modeled and limited guidance exists on how to do so.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using three existing DCE studies, we demonstrate how researchers can identify and assess the impact of common RUT-violating heuristics in applied DCE studies. A structured interview guide and rating instrument were developed to identify heuristics a priori, based on clinician and researcher input. Latent-Class Models with restricted parameters were pre-specified to estimate heuristic impacts vis-à-vis preference heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our sensitivity analyses showed that up to 22% of the respondents likely applied particular heuristics. This impacted study results: For example, accounting for dominant decision-making (i.e., a class in which respondents ignored any attributes other than the risk of side effects), increased respondents’ average willingness-to-pay for antibiotics with a low contribution to antibiotic resistance by 15,63 Euros per treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Ignoring heuristics that violate RUT assumptions biases preference estimates, marginal rates of substitution and uptake predictions in DCEs. We recommend assessing the likely presence and impact of heuristics in sensitivity analyses of future DCEs to ensure robustness and accuracy of results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"394 ","pages":"Article 119044"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146158417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mass incarceration and its spillover effects: a scoping review of incarceration rates and health 大规模监禁及其溢出效应:对监禁率和健康的范围审查。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.118964
Louisa W. Holaday , Karenna K. Thomas , Jaelen I. King , Alyssa A. Grimshaw , Jessica T. Simes , Emily A. Wang

Objective

Evidence suggests that mass incarceration has had negative population health effects not only through those directly impacted, but through “spillover” onto families and more broadly. We scope the literature to synthesize findings across disciplines and health outcomes.

Methods

We searched 10 medical databases for quantitative studies published from January 01, 1990 to 04/24/2024 examining the association between incarceration rates and outcomes of physical health, mental health, or social determinants of health. We grouped findings by health outcome and differentiated by geographic level, demographic subgroups, and type of carceral exposure (jail versus prison).

Results

We identified 70 studies at geographic levels ranging from census block to country. Sixty found a positive independent association between incarceration rates and poor health outcomes. Evidence was strongest for premature mortality, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and adverse birth outcomes. Few studies investigated chronic conditions or mechanisms underlying the association between incarceration rates and health. Effect sizes were largest at the neighborhood level. Almost two-thirds of studies were high quality, and quality was primarily limited by data availability.

Conclusions

There is substantial evidence that as incarceration rates increase, population health worsens. Strong evidence of spillover to never-incarcerated individuals is demonstrated by significant associations in multilevel models accounting for personal and household incarceration, negative outcomes in babies and children too young to be incarcerated, and stronger effects observed among women, who are far less likely to be incarcerated than men. Reducing incarceration rates may reduce STIs even among those never incarcerated. Further research is needed into chronic conditions and the mechanisms underlying identified associations, which would be facilitated by improved data access.

Policy implications

Federal, state, and county actors should make neighborhood-level incarceration and crime data available, carceral facilities should institute opt-out STI testing, and cities should make STI testing easily available in high incarceration neighborhoods.
目标:证据表明,大规模监禁不仅通过直接受影响的人,而且通过“溢出”到家庭和更广泛的范围,对人口健康产生负面影响。我们对文献进行了梳理,以综合跨学科的研究结果和健康结果。方法:我们检索了10个医学数据库,从1990年1月1日至2024年4月24日发表的定量研究,研究监禁率与身体健康、心理健康或健康的社会决定因素之间的关系。我们根据健康结果对研究结果进行分组,并根据地理水平、人口亚组和监狱暴露类型(监狱与监狱)进行区分。结果:我们在从人口普查区到国家的地理水平上确定了70项研究。60人发现监禁率与健康状况不佳之间存在正相关关系。过早死亡、性传播感染(STIs)和不良出生结局的证据最为明显。很少有研究调查监禁率与健康之间关系的慢性病或潜在机制。邻域水平的效应最大。几乎三分之二的研究是高质量的,而质量主要受到数据可用性的限制。结论:有大量证据表明,随着监禁率的增加,人口健康状况恶化。在考虑个人和家庭监禁、婴儿和年龄太小而不能被监禁的儿童的负面结果以及在女性中观察到的更强的影响(女性被监禁的可能性远低于男性)的多层次模型中,证明了对从未被监禁的个体的溢出效应的有力证据。降低监禁率可能会减少性传播感染,即使是那些从未被监禁的人。需要对慢性病和已确定关联的潜在机制进行进一步研究,改善数据获取将有助于这方面的研究。政策影响:联邦、州和县的行为者应该提供社区一级的监禁和犯罪数据,监狱设施应该实行选择性退出性传播感染检测,城市应该在高监禁社区方便地进行性传播感染检测。
{"title":"Mass incarceration and its spillover effects: a scoping review of incarceration rates and health","authors":"Louisa W. Holaday ,&nbsp;Karenna K. Thomas ,&nbsp;Jaelen I. King ,&nbsp;Alyssa A. Grimshaw ,&nbsp;Jessica T. Simes ,&nbsp;Emily A. Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.118964","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.118964","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Evidence suggests that mass incarceration has had negative population health effects not only through those directly impacted, but through “spillover” onto families and more broadly. We scope the literature to synthesize findings across disciplines and health outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched 10 medical databases for quantitative studies published from January 01, 1990 to 04/24/2024 examining the association between incarceration rates and outcomes of physical health, mental health, or social determinants of health. We grouped findings by health outcome and differentiated by geographic level, demographic subgroups, and type of carceral exposure (jail versus prison).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 70 studies at geographic levels ranging from census block to country. Sixty found a positive independent association between incarceration rates and poor health outcomes. Evidence was strongest for premature mortality, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and adverse birth outcomes. Few studies investigated chronic conditions or mechanisms underlying the association between incarceration rates and health. Effect sizes were largest at the neighborhood level. Almost two-thirds of studies were high quality, and quality was primarily limited by data availability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is substantial evidence that as incarceration rates increase, population health worsens. Strong evidence of spillover to never-incarcerated individuals is demonstrated by significant associations in multilevel models accounting for personal and household incarceration, negative outcomes in babies and children too young to be incarcerated, and stronger effects observed among women, who are far less likely to be incarcerated than men. Reducing incarceration rates may reduce STIs even among those never incarcerated. Further research is needed into chronic conditions and the mechanisms underlying identified associations, which would be facilitated by improved data access.</div></div><div><h3>Policy implications</h3><div>Federal, state, and county actors should make neighborhood-level incarceration and crime data available, carceral facilities should institute opt-out STI testing, and cities should make STI testing easily available in high incarceration neighborhoods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"394 ","pages":"Article 118964"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146158660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does aggressive policing worsen infant health disparities? Evidence from ‘Stop and Frisk’ in New York City 激进的警务会加剧婴儿健康差距吗?来自纽约市“拦截搜身”的证据
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.118943
Nicole S. Ngo , James Rising
Racism in the U.S. is considered a major public health threat, yet the impact of racial profiling and aggressive policing on health disparities has received less attention in the public policy literature. The Stop, Question, and Frisk program (SQF) in New York City was ruled unconstitutional in 2013 due to racial biases in policing, specifically toward Black and Hispanic communities. While the original intent was to enhance public safety, there are concerns SQF did the opposite by generating distrust and anxiety in communities where it was viewed as racial profiling. Consequently, we investigate the impacts of police stops on a key indicator of public safety and social welfare: infant health. We use restricted infant health data from September 2006 to the end of 2013 and merge this information with detailed data on a mother's community exposure to police stops at the zip code-birth month-year level in New York City. Results show an increase in community exposure to police stops of 10% is associated with a modest, but robust reduction in birth weight of 1.9 g for non-Hispanic Black mothers. We also find small, negative effects on Apgar 5 scores for all mothers. These results are robust to several checks for selection and omitted variable bias, as well as to alternative specifications and falsification tests. Our findings have important implications for both public safety and reducing the gap in racial health disparities, suggesting that even mothers who do not have direct interactions with police could still be modestly impacted by SQF.
在美国,种族主义被认为是一个主要的公共卫生威胁,然而,在公共政策文献中,种族貌相和激进警务对健康差距的影响却很少受到关注。2013年,纽约市的拦截、询问和搜身计划(SQF)被裁定违宪,原因是警察中存在种族偏见,特别是针对黑人和西班牙裔社区。虽然最初的目的是加强公共安全,但有人担心SQF会在被视为种族定性的社区中产生不信任和焦虑,从而适得其反。因此,我们调查了警察拦截对公共安全和社会福利的一个关键指标的影响:婴儿健康。我们使用了2006年9月至2013年底的有限婴儿健康数据,并将这些信息与纽约市邮政编码-出生月-年级别的母亲社区暴露于警察拦截的详细数据合并。结果显示,社区被警察拦停的几率增加10%,与非西班牙裔黑人母亲出生体重(1.9 g)的适度但强劲的下降有关。我们还发现,对所有母亲的阿普加5分都有轻微的负面影响。这些结果是稳健的几个检查选择和省略的变量偏差,以及替代规范和证伪检验。我们的研究结果对公共安全和缩小种族健康差距具有重要意义,这表明即使与警察没有直接互动的母亲也可能受到SQF的轻微影响。
{"title":"Does aggressive policing worsen infant health disparities? Evidence from ‘Stop and Frisk’ in New York City","authors":"Nicole S. Ngo ,&nbsp;James Rising","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.118943","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.118943","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Racism in the U.S. is considered a major public health threat, yet the impact of racial profiling and aggressive policing on health disparities has received less attention in the public policy literature. The Stop, Question, and Frisk program (SQF) in New York City was ruled unconstitutional in 2013 due to racial biases in policing, specifically toward Black and Hispanic communities. While the original intent was to enhance public safety, there are concerns SQF did the opposite by generating distrust and anxiety in communities where it was viewed as racial profiling. Consequently, we investigate the impacts of police stops on a key indicator of public safety and social welfare: infant health. We use restricted infant health data from September 2006 to the end of 2013 and merge this information with detailed data on a mother's community exposure to police stops at the zip code-birth month-year level in New York City. Results show an increase in community exposure to police stops of 10% is associated with a modest, but robust reduction in birth weight of 1.9 g for non-Hispanic Black mothers. We also find small, negative effects on Apgar 5 scores for all mothers. These results are robust to several checks for selection and omitted variable bias, as well as to alternative specifications and falsification tests. Our findings have important implications for both public safety and reducing the gap in racial health disparities, suggesting that even mothers who do not have direct interactions with police could still be modestly impacted by SQF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"395 ","pages":"Article 118943"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146193274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The neuro-fiction of addiction immunizations 成瘾免疫的神经虚构。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119059
Kristin Kay Barker , Erin F. Madden , Preston Lawayne Lowe , Katherine Rickers
Animal studies demonstrating “proof of concept” for addiction immunizations were first published in the 1970s. As originally theorized, immunization could block the brain's absorption of a drug, eliminate its pleasurable effects, and reduce or extinguish future drug-seeking behavior. Since the publication of this foundational animal research, addiction vaccines for humans have been heralded as potential “game changers” in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUD). Labeled as “novel” and “promising” for fifty years, addiction immunizations are still an imaginary. Drawing on the sociology of expectations framework, we analyze the ongoing failure, novelty and promise of immunizations for SUD. Through an interpretive systematic review of the international peer-reviewed medical literature related to addiction immunization from the 1970s forward, we reveal how this body of R&D is simultaneously riddled with failure, on the verge of game-changing breakthroughs, and guardian of the brain disease model of addiction. We investigate how, why and with what consequences addiction vaccines have remained novel and promising in the context of ongoing failure. Our analysis foregrounds three interrelated promissory dynamics that have animated the hunt for addiction immunizations and the neuro-pharmaceuticalization of addiction for fifty years. We argue that the past, present and future support of the idea of addiction vaccines is in service of the dominant but unsettled understanding of addiction as a brain disease. Addiction immunizations are a neuro-fiction: an imaginary neuro-technological solution to a pressing problem. Although imaginary, they espouse an actuality about addiction with significant real-world implications.
证明成瘾免疫“概念证明”的动物研究首次发表于20世纪70年代。正如最初的理论,免疫可以阻止大脑对药物的吸收,消除其愉悦的效果,并减少或消除未来的药物寻求行为。自从这项基础动物研究发表以来,人类成瘾疫苗被誉为治疗物质使用障碍(SUD)的潜在“游戏规则改变者”。50年来,成瘾免疫一直被贴上“新颖”和“有前途”的标签,但它仍然是一种想象。利用期望社会学框架,我们分析了SUD免疫接种的持续失败,新颖性和前景。通过对20世纪70年代以来与成瘾免疫相关的国际同行评议医学文献的解释性系统回顾,我们揭示了这一研发机构如何同时充斥着失败,处于改变游戏规则的突破边缘,以及成瘾的脑部疾病模型的守护者。我们调查成瘾疫苗在持续失败的背景下如何,为什么以及有什么后果保持新颖和有希望。我们的分析展望了三种相互关联的期待值动力学,这些期待值动力学在过去五十年中激发了对成瘾免疫和成瘾神经药物化的研究。我们认为,过去,现在和未来对成瘾疫苗的支持是为成瘾作为一种脑部疾病的主导但不稳定的理解服务的。成瘾免疫是一种神经虚构:一种想象的神经技术解决方案,以解决一个紧迫的问题。尽管是虚构的,但它们支持具有重要现实意义的成瘾现实。
{"title":"The neuro-fiction of addiction immunizations","authors":"Kristin Kay Barker ,&nbsp;Erin F. Madden ,&nbsp;Preston Lawayne Lowe ,&nbsp;Katherine Rickers","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119059","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119059","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Animal studies demonstrating “proof of concept” for addiction immunizations were first published in the 1970s. As originally theorized, immunization could block the brain's absorption of a drug, eliminate its pleasurable effects, and reduce or extinguish future drug-seeking behavior. Since the publication of this foundational animal research, addiction vaccines for humans have been heralded as potential “game changers” in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUD). Labeled as “novel” and “promising” for fifty years, addiction immunizations are still an imaginary. Drawing on the sociology of expectations framework, we analyze the ongoing failure, novelty and promise of immunizations for SUD. Through an <em>interpretive systematic review</em> of the international peer-reviewed medical literature related to addiction immunization from the 1970s forward, we reveal how this body of R&amp;D is simultaneously riddled with failure, on the verge of game-changing breakthroughs, and guardian of the brain disease model of addiction. We investigate how, why and with what consequences addiction vaccines have remained novel and promising in the context of ongoing failure. Our analysis foregrounds three interrelated promissory dynamics that have animated the hunt for addiction immunizations and the neuro-pharmaceuticalization of addiction for fifty years. We argue that the past, present and future support of the idea of addiction vaccines is in service of the dominant but unsettled understanding of addiction as a brain disease. Addiction immunizations are a <em>neuro-fiction</em>: an imaginary neuro-technological solution to a pressing problem. Although imaginary, they espouse an actuality about addiction with significant real-world implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"394 ","pages":"Article 119059"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146167508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rare diseases, global health, and local contexts 罕见病、全球卫生和地方情况
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119042
Małgorzata Rajtar , Eva-Maria Knoll
{"title":"Rare diseases, global health, and local contexts","authors":"Małgorzata Rajtar ,&nbsp;Eva-Maria Knoll","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119042","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119042","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"395 ","pages":"Article 119042"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146193053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“It should have been my decision”: A mixed methods investigation of contraceptive coercion among U.S. patients with and without disabilities “这应该是我的决定”:一项对美国残疾和非残疾患者强制避孕的混合方法调查。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119058
Lindsay M. Cannon , Tiffany L. Green , Meaghan E. Bethea , Laura E.T. Swan

Background

People with disabilities have long faced threats to their bodily autonomy and reproductive decision-making. One such threat, provider-based contraceptive coercion, occurs when healthcare providers pressure patients to use (upward coercion) or not use (downward coercion) birth control. Yet, modern experiences of contraceptive coercion among people with disabilities remain underexplored.

Methods

In 2023, we surveyed U.S. reproductive-aged people assigned female at birth using Prolific, a national panel of vetted respondents. Participants reported their disability status and contraceptive care experiences. We examined differences in contraceptive coercion by disability status and tested whether self-reported discrimination in contraceptive care mediated this relationship. We also used reflexive thematic analysis to explore contraceptive coercion among people with disabilities.

Results

In our analytic sample (N = 1150), people with disabilities were significantly more likely than those without to report ever experiencing any contraceptive coercion (49.4% vs. 38.9%), including upward coercion (40.1% vs. 31.1%) and downward coercion (23.3% vs. 13.2%). These disparities persisted after adjusting for sociodemographic controls. Self-reported discrimination in contraceptive care mediated the relationship between disability status and contraceptive coercion. Open-ended analysis revealed the complex ways that contraceptive coercion is intertwined with disability status, often involving discriminatory, dismissive, and contradictory contraceptive counseling.

Conclusions

Contraceptive coercion is more common among individuals with disabilities and is explained by self-reported discriminatory care. Understanding these experiences is key to resisting coercive practices and advancing disability-informed reproductive justice.
背景:长期以来,残疾人的身体自主权和生育决策一直面临威胁。其中一种威胁是基于提供者的避孕强制,当医疗保健提供者迫使患者使用(向上强迫)或不使用(向下强迫)节育措施时,就会发生这种威胁。然而,残疾人强制避孕的现代经验仍未得到充分探索。方法:2023年,我们对美国生育年龄的人进行了调查,他们在出生时被指定为女性,这是一个由经过审查的全国性调查小组。参与者报告了他们的残疾状况和避孕护理经历。我们研究了残疾状况对避孕强制的差异,并测试了自我报告的避孕护理歧视是否介导了这种关系。我们还使用反身性专题分析来探讨残疾人的避孕强制措施。结果:在我们的分析样本(N = 1150)中,残疾人比非残疾人更有可能报告曾经经历过任何避孕强迫(49.4%比38.9%),包括向上强迫(40.1%比31.1%)和向下强迫(23.3%比13.2%)。在调整了社会人口控制因素后,这些差异仍然存在。自我报告的避孕护理歧视在残疾状况与避孕强制之间的关系中起中介作用。开放式分析揭示了强制避孕与残疾状况交织在一起的复杂方式,往往涉及歧视性、不屑一顾和相互矛盾的避孕咨询。结论:强迫避孕在残疾人中更为常见,这可以用自我报告的歧视性护理来解释。了解这些经验是抵制强制性做法和推进残障知情生殖司法的关键。
{"title":"“It should have been my decision”: A mixed methods investigation of contraceptive coercion among U.S. patients with and without disabilities","authors":"Lindsay M. Cannon ,&nbsp;Tiffany L. Green ,&nbsp;Meaghan E. Bethea ,&nbsp;Laura E.T. Swan","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119058","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119058","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>People with disabilities have long faced threats to their bodily autonomy and reproductive decision-making. One such threat, provider-based contraceptive coercion, occurs when healthcare providers pressure patients to use (upward coercion) or not use (downward coercion) birth control. Yet, modern experiences of contraceptive coercion among people with disabilities remain underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In 2023, we surveyed U.S. reproductive-aged people assigned female at birth using Prolific, a national panel of vetted respondents. Participants reported their disability status and contraceptive care experiences. We examined differences in contraceptive coercion by disability status and tested whether self-reported discrimination in contraceptive care mediated this relationship. We also used reflexive thematic analysis to explore contraceptive coercion among people with disabilities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In our analytic sample (N = 1150), people with disabilities were significantly more likely than those without to report ever experiencing any contraceptive coercion (49.4% vs. 38.9%), including upward coercion (40.1% vs. 31.1%) and downward coercion (23.3% vs. 13.2%). These disparities persisted after adjusting for sociodemographic controls. Self-reported discrimination in contraceptive care mediated the relationship between disability status and contraceptive coercion. Open-ended analysis revealed the complex ways that contraceptive coercion is intertwined with disability status, often involving discriminatory, dismissive, and contradictory contraceptive counseling.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Contraceptive coercion is more common among individuals with disabilities and is explained by self-reported discriminatory care. Understanding these experiences is key to resisting coercive practices and advancing disability-informed reproductive justice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"394 ","pages":"Article 119058"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146158959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perceived ideological polarization, trust in science and healthcare, and COVID-19 vaccination intention: A four-wave cross-lagged mediation panel analysis 意识形态极化感知、对科学和医疗保健的信任与COVID-19疫苗接种意图:四波交叉滞后中介面板分析
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119057
Andrej Kirbiš, Stefani Branilović
Ideological polarization is often theorized to erode trust in science and healthcare, thereby reducing compliance with health guidelines and vaccine uptake. In this study, we examined the longitudinal relationships between perceived ideological polarization, trust in science and healthcare, and COVID-19 vaccination intention, using a four-wave panel design. We analysed four waves of panel data from a sample of 488 Slovenians, representative by gender, age, and education. Pearson correlations and a random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) were used to assess both within- and between-person associations, and to test whether trust in science and healthcare mediated the relationship between perceived ideological polarization and vaccination intention over time. Baseline correlations showed a positive association between perceived ideological polarization, trust, and vaccination intention, though these associations weakened and became non-significant in later waves. RI-CLPM results revealed no evidence of causal, within-person effects of perceived ideological polarization on later trust or vaccination intention, and no longitudinal mediation pathways. However, between-person effects indicated that individuals with consistently higher trust in science and healthcare reported higher vaccination intentions across time. These findings challenge the assumption that ideological polarization undermines trust and vaccination intention, suggesting that cross-sectional associations observed in prior research may reflect stable between-person differences rather than dynamic causal processes. By distinguishing cross-sectional from longitudinal evidence, this study underscores institutional trust as the key predictor of vaccination intention and calls for comparative research across political and cultural contexts.
意识形态的两极分化经常被理论化,以削弱对科学和医疗保健的信任,从而减少对健康指南的遵守和疫苗的吸收。在这项研究中,我们使用四波面板设计,研究了感知到的意识形态两极分化、对科学和医疗保健的信任以及COVID-19疫苗接种意图之间的纵向关系。我们分析了来自488名斯洛文尼亚人样本的四波面板数据,这些数据按性别、年龄和教育程度具有代表性。使用Pearson相关性和随机截距交叉滞后面板模型(RI-CLPM)来评估人与人之间和人与人之间的关联,并测试对科学和医疗保健的信任是否会随着时间的推移介导感知的意识形态极化和接种意愿之间的关系。基线相关性显示,感知到的意识形态极化、信任和疫苗接种意图之间存在正相关,尽管这些关联在后来的浪潮中减弱并变得不显著。RI-CLPM结果显示,没有证据表明意识形态两极分化对后来的信任或疫苗接种意图有因果关系,也没有纵向中介途径。然而,人与人之间的影响表明,对科学和医疗保健的信任度一贯较高的个体报告了更高的疫苗接种意愿。这些发现挑战了意识形态两极分化破坏信任和疫苗接种意图的假设,表明在先前的研究中观察到的横断面关联可能反映了稳定的人与人之间的差异,而不是动态的因果过程。通过区分横截面证据和纵向证据,本研究强调了机构信任是疫苗接种意图的关键预测因素,并呼吁进行跨政治和文化背景的比较研究。
{"title":"Perceived ideological polarization, trust in science and healthcare, and COVID-19 vaccination intention: A four-wave cross-lagged mediation panel analysis","authors":"Andrej Kirbiš,&nbsp;Stefani Branilović","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119057","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119057","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ideological polarization is often theorized to erode trust in science and healthcare, thereby reducing compliance with health guidelines and vaccine uptake. In this study, we examined the longitudinal relationships between perceived ideological polarization, trust in science and healthcare, and COVID-19 vaccination intention, using a four-wave panel design. We analysed four waves of panel data from a sample of 488 Slovenians, representative by gender, age, and education. Pearson correlations and a random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) were used to assess both within- and between-person associations, and to test whether trust in science and healthcare mediated the relationship between perceived ideological polarization and vaccination intention over time. Baseline correlations showed a positive association between perceived ideological polarization, trust, and vaccination intention, though these associations weakened and became non-significant in later waves. RI-CLPM results revealed no evidence of causal, within-person effects of perceived ideological polarization on later trust or vaccination intention, and no longitudinal mediation pathways. However, between-person effects indicated that individuals with consistently higher trust in science and healthcare reported higher vaccination intentions across time. These findings challenge the assumption that ideological polarization undermines trust and vaccination intention, suggesting that cross-sectional associations observed in prior research may reflect stable between-person differences rather than dynamic causal processes. By distinguishing cross-sectional from longitudinal evidence, this study underscores institutional trust as the key predictor of vaccination intention and calls for comparative research across political and cultural contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"394 ","pages":"Article 119057"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146158723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sauna culture improves physical and mental wellbeing in the UK through social connection and ritual 桑拿文化通过社会联系和仪式改善了英国人的身心健康。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119061
M. Newson , R. McGrath , I. Mosina , G. Reason , L. Peitz
Sauna culture is experiencing rapid global growth, yet beyond physical health benefits, remains largely understudied within academic research. We investigate both its physical and mental health benefits in the UK using the Social Cure model in conjunction with a ritual lens to understand how feelings of connection grow via sauna. Across three studies (N = 1,907), we explored the role of social identities in shaping wellbeing outcomes among sauna users. Studies 1 and 3 employed longitudinal designs, revealing increases in emotional wellbeing over time, while Study 2 used a cross-sectional approach and showed that stronger sauna identities were associated with self-reported improvements in both physical and emotional wellbeing. Study 3 further demonstrated that perceiving sauna use as a ritual, alongside experiencing emotional synchrony during sauna sessions, was positively linked to stronger sauna identities. Together, these findings suggest that the social and ritual aspects of sauna use may contribute to its wellbeing effects, with potential implications for sauna operators in the UK and beyond.
桑拿文化正在全球迅速发展,但除了对身体健康的好处之外,学术研究在很大程度上仍未得到充分研究。我们在英国使用社会治疗模型结合仪式镜头调查了桑拿对身体和心理健康的好处,以了解通过桑拿建立联系的感觉是如何增长的。通过三项研究(N = 1907),我们探讨了社会身份在塑造桑拿使用者健康结果中的作用。研究1和研究3采用纵向设计,揭示了情绪幸福感随着时间的推移而增加,而研究2采用横断面方法,表明更强的桑拿身份与自我报告的身体和情绪幸福感的改善有关。研究3进一步表明,将桑拿视为一种仪式,同时在桑拿过程中体验情感同步,与更强的桑拿身份正相关。总之,这些发现表明,使用桑拿的社交和仪式方面可能有助于其健康影响,这对英国及其他地区的桑拿运营商有潜在的影响。
{"title":"Sauna culture improves physical and mental wellbeing in the UK through social connection and ritual","authors":"M. Newson ,&nbsp;R. McGrath ,&nbsp;I. Mosina ,&nbsp;G. Reason ,&nbsp;L. Peitz","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119061","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119061","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sauna culture is experiencing rapid global growth, yet beyond physical health benefits, remains largely understudied within academic research. We investigate both its physical and mental health benefits in the UK using the Social Cure model in conjunction with a ritual lens to understand how feelings of connection grow via sauna. Across three studies (<em>N</em> = 1,907), we explored the role of social identities in shaping wellbeing outcomes among sauna users. Studies 1 and 3 employed longitudinal designs, revealing increases in emotional wellbeing over time, while Study 2 used a cross-sectional approach and showed that stronger sauna identities were associated with self-reported improvements in both physical and emotional wellbeing. Study 3 further demonstrated that perceiving sauna use as a ritual, alongside experiencing emotional synchrony during sauna sessions, was positively linked to stronger sauna identities. Together, these findings suggest that the social and ritual aspects of sauna use may contribute to its wellbeing effects, with potential implications for sauna operators in the UK and beyond.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"394 ","pages":"Article 119061"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146182845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The gendered landscape of informal caregiving: Cohort effects and socioeconomic inequalities in England 非正式看护的性别景观:英格兰的群体效应和社会经济不平等。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119052
Maria Petrillo , Ricardo Rodrigues , Matt Bennett , Gwilym Pryce
We provide the first detailed cohort analysis of the gender care gap that examines the association between caregiving provision, individual-level poverty, meso-level deprivation, and individual circumstances. Using data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study, we use (i) multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression to provide a detailed age cohort analysis of the probability of providing informal care by sex; and (ii) Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) to provide an intersectional examination of informal carers.
Our results reveal a clear age pattern in caregiving, peaking between ages 60–70 before declining, with earlier-born cohorts showing higher caregiving likelihood at the same ages than later-born cohorts. The gender care gap is most pronounced among middle-born cohorts (1969–1978, 1959–1968, and 1949–1958), particularly between ages 50 and 60. While overall caregiving prevalence is higher among individuals experiencing poverty and living in deprived areas, the gender care gap is larger among individuals above the poverty line and in non-deprived areas. Caregiving is primarily associated with the independent effects of cohort, gender, poverty, and meso-level deprivation, with limited evidence of multiplicative intersectional effects.
Policy attempts to address the gender care gap need to be mindful of these variations, not least because they potentially elucidate the potential sources of gender inequalities in care.
我们首次对性别护理差距进行了详细的队列分析,研究了护理提供、个人贫困、中水平剥夺和个人环境之间的关系。使用来自英国家庭纵向研究的数据,我们使用(i)多层次混合效应逻辑回归提供了详细的年龄队列分析,按性别提供非正式护理的概率;(ii)个体异质性和歧视性准确性的多水平分析(MAIHDA),以提供非正式照顾者的交叉检查。我们的研究结果揭示了一个明确的年龄模式,在60-70岁之间达到高峰,然后下降,早出生的队列在同一年龄比晚出生的队列显示出更高的照顾可能性。性别护理差距在中间出生的队列(1969-1978年、1959-1968年和1949-1958年)中最为明显,特别是在50 - 60岁之间。虽然贫困和生活在贫困地区的个人总体护理普及率较高,但在贫困线以上和非贫困地区的个人中,性别护理差距更大。看护主要与队列、性别、贫困和中观水平剥夺的独立影响有关,有限的证据表明多重交叉效应。解决性别护理差距的政策尝试需要注意这些差异,尤其是因为它们可能阐明护理中性别不平等的潜在根源。
{"title":"The gendered landscape of informal caregiving: Cohort effects and socioeconomic inequalities in England","authors":"Maria Petrillo ,&nbsp;Ricardo Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Matt Bennett ,&nbsp;Gwilym Pryce","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119052","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119052","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We provide the first detailed cohort analysis of the gender care gap that examines the association between caregiving provision, individual-level poverty, meso-level deprivation, and individual circumstances. Using data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study, we use (i) multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression to provide a detailed age cohort analysis of the probability of providing informal care by sex; and (ii) Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) to provide an intersectional examination of informal carers.</div><div>Our results reveal a clear age pattern in caregiving, peaking between ages 60–70 before declining, with earlier-born cohorts showing higher caregiving likelihood at the same ages than later-born cohorts. The gender care gap is most pronounced among middle-born cohorts (1969–1978, 1959–1968, and 1949–1958), particularly between ages 50 and 60. While overall caregiving prevalence is higher among individuals experiencing poverty and living in deprived areas, the gender care gap is larger among individuals above the poverty line and in non-deprived areas. Caregiving is primarily associated with the independent effects of cohort, gender, poverty, and meso-level deprivation, with limited evidence of multiplicative intersectional effects.</div><div>Policy attempts to address the gender care gap need to be mindful of these variations, not least because they potentially elucidate the potential sources of gender inequalities in care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"393 ","pages":"Article 119052"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146133438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Spatially heterogeneous and neighborhood impacts of deep tubewells on childhood diarrhea in rural Bangladesh 孟加拉国农村深管井对儿童腹泻的空间异质性和邻里影响
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119043
Varun Goel , Mark M. Janko , Katerina EB. Beach , Md Yunus , Md Taslim Ali , Md Al Fazal Khan , Md Nurul Alam , A.S.G. Faruque , Paul L. Delamater , Marc L. Serre , Mark D. Sobsey , Md Sirajul Islam , Michael Emch
Deep tubewells that procure groundwater from deep arsenic-free aquifers are crucial sources of safe drinking-water in rural Bangladesh. However, their health benefits may be heterogeneous and context dependent: inequitable distribution, long collection distances and continued use of unsafe alternatives may increase microbial contamination and diarrheal disease. We examined whether the association between household deep tubewell use and under-five diarrhea varies across space and how neighborhood context helps explain this variation. Prospective diarrhea surveillance was conducted across 19,203 households with under-five children in Matlab, Bangladesh from March 2018 to October 2019. We fitted hierarchical logistic regression models accounting for spatially varying relationships and neighborhood-level measures of deep tubewell use. In non-spatial models, household deep tubewell use is associated with lower childhood diarrhea (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% Uncertainty Interval (UI) 0.68–0.96). Accounting for space suggests spatial confounding and that the effect of household deep tubewell use on diarrhea may change based on location. Additionally, there is evidence of neighborhood effects: households in areas where more than 60% of neighbors used deep tubewells had lower odds of childhood diarrhea than those in neighborhoods with lower deep tubewell use (OR 0.72, 95% UI 0.57–0.92), with strongest protection among households that used deep tubewells. Results suggest that despite positive effects, benefits of deep tubewells are unequally distributed, and increasing deep tubewell density can further reduce childhood diarrheal disease burden in rural Bangladesh. This study highlights the importance of incorporating geographic context in the design and evaluation of drinking-water and other population health interventions.
从深层无砷含水层获取地下水的深管井是孟加拉国农村安全饮用水的重要来源。然而,它们对健康的益处可能是不同的,并取决于具体情况:分配不公平、收集距离长以及继续使用不安全的替代品可能会增加微生物污染和腹泻病。我们研究了家庭深管井使用与五岁以下儿童腹泻之间的关系是否因空间而异,以及社区环境如何帮助解释这种差异。2018年3月至2019年10月,在孟加拉国Matlab对19,203个5岁以下儿童家庭进行了前瞻性腹泻监测。我们拟合了层次逻辑回归模型,考虑了空间变化关系和深管井使用的邻里水平措施。在非空间模型中,家庭深管井使用与儿童腹泻发生率降低相关(优势比(OR) 0.81, 95%不确定区间(UI) 0.68-0.96)。考虑到空间因素,表明空间混淆,家庭深管井对腹泻的影响可能因地点而异。此外,还有邻里效应的证据:超过60%的邻居使用深管井的地区的家庭比使用深管井较少的社区的家庭患儿童腹泻的几率更低(OR 0.72, 95% UI 0.57-0.92),使用深管井的家庭的保护最强。结果表明,尽管深管井具有积极作用,但效益分布不均,增加深管井密度可以进一步减轻孟加拉国农村儿童腹泻疾病负担。这项研究强调了在饮用水和其他人口健康干预措施的设计和评价中纳入地理环境的重要性。
{"title":"Spatially heterogeneous and neighborhood impacts of deep tubewells on childhood diarrhea in rural Bangladesh","authors":"Varun Goel ,&nbsp;Mark M. Janko ,&nbsp;Katerina EB. Beach ,&nbsp;Md Yunus ,&nbsp;Md Taslim Ali ,&nbsp;Md Al Fazal Khan ,&nbsp;Md Nurul Alam ,&nbsp;A.S.G. Faruque ,&nbsp;Paul L. Delamater ,&nbsp;Marc L. Serre ,&nbsp;Mark D. Sobsey ,&nbsp;Md Sirajul Islam ,&nbsp;Michael Emch","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119043","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119043","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Deep tubewells that procure groundwater from deep arsenic-free aquifers are crucial sources of safe drinking-water in rural Bangladesh. However, their health benefits may be heterogeneous and context dependent: inequitable distribution, long collection distances and continued use of unsafe alternatives may increase microbial contamination and diarrheal disease. We examined whether the association between household deep tubewell use and under-five diarrhea varies across space and how neighborhood context helps explain this variation. Prospective diarrhea surveillance was conducted across 19,203 households with under-five children in Matlab, Bangladesh from March 2018 to October 2019. We fitted hierarchical logistic regression models accounting for spatially varying relationships and neighborhood-level measures of deep tubewell use. In non-spatial models, household deep tubewell use is associated with lower childhood diarrhea (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% Uncertainty Interval (UI) 0.68–0.96). Accounting for space suggests spatial confounding and that the effect of household deep tubewell use on diarrhea may change based on location. Additionally, there is evidence of neighborhood effects: households in areas where more than 60% of neighbors used deep tubewells had lower odds of childhood diarrhea than those in neighborhoods with lower deep tubewell use (OR 0.72, 95% UI 0.57–0.92), with strongest protection among households that used deep tubewells. Results suggest that despite positive effects, benefits of deep tubewells are unequally distributed, and increasing deep tubewell density can further reduce childhood diarrheal disease burden in rural Bangladesh. This study highlights the importance of incorporating geographic context in the design and evaluation of drinking-water and other population health interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"393 ","pages":"Article 119043"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146133464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Social Science & Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1