首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Agromedicine最新文献

英文 中文
Identifying and Describing Mental Health Stigma Among Agricultural Youth Directors: Does Stigma Influence Practices? 识别和描述农业青年主管中的心理健康污名:耻辱感是否会影响实践?
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2416427
Kaleigh Barnett, Courtney Cuthbertson, Josie M Rudolphi

Objectives: This exploratory study aims to: 1) evaluate mental health stigma levels among agricultural youth directors, 2) examine the influence of professional characteristics on stigma, and 3) investigate the relationship between agricultural youth directors' stigma levels and their self-efficacy.

Methods: An online survey was administered from March to May 2022 to 642 agricultural youth directors in Illinois who work with youth aged 1-19. Directors' personal and perceived stigmas toward mental illness were measured using the Depression Stigma Scale. Directors' self-efficacy (perceived level of knowledge and confidence) across 19 mental health topics was measured using a 3-point Likert scale. Analyses were conducted by generating descriptive statistics and performing Mann-Whitney U tests on the data.

Results: The median personal depression stigma score was 7.57 (SD = 8.02). Our analyses identified significantly higher personal depression stigma scores among men, FFA advisors, agricultural educators, and those lacking personal experience with mental illness. A lack of self-efficacy correlated significantly with increased personal stigma.

Conclusions: This study underscores the critical need for targeted educational interventions to reduce stigma among agricultural youth directors and enchance mental health literacy. Anti-stigma and mental health literacy initiatives are essential for fostering a supportive environment that encourages open discussions about mental health issues with youth within the agricultural community.

目标:本探索性研究旨在1)评估农业青年主任的心理健康成见水平;2)研究职业特征对成见的影响;3)调查农业青年主任的成见水平与其自我效能感之间的关系:2022 年 3 月至 5 月,对伊利诺伊州 642 名从事 1-19 岁青少年工作的农业青少年主管进行了在线调查。使用抑郁耻辱量表测量了主任个人和感知到的对精神疾病的耻辱感。采用 3 点李克特量表测量主任对 19 个心理健康主题的自我效能感(感知的知识和信心水平)。分析方法是对数据进行描述性统计和曼-惠特尼 U 检验:结果:个人抑郁成见得分的中位数为 7.57(SD = 8.02)。我们在分析中发现,男性、FFA 顾问、农业教育工作者和缺乏精神疾病亲身经历的人的个人抑郁耻辱感得分明显更高。缺乏自我效能感与个人耻辱感的增加有显著相关性:这项研究强调,亟需采取有针对性的教育干预措施,以减少农业青年指导员的耻辱感,并提高心理健康素养。反污名化和心理健康扫盲活动对于营造一个支持性环境,鼓励农业社区青年公开讨论心理健康问题至关重要。
{"title":"Identifying and Describing Mental Health Stigma Among Agricultural Youth Directors: Does Stigma Influence Practices?","authors":"Kaleigh Barnett, Courtney Cuthbertson, Josie M Rudolphi","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2416427","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2416427","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This exploratory study aims to: 1) evaluate mental health stigma levels among agricultural youth directors, 2) examine the influence of professional characteristics on stigma, and 3) investigate the relationship between agricultural youth directors' stigma levels and their self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was administered from March to May 2022 to 642 agricultural youth directors in Illinois who work with youth aged 1-19. Directors' personal and perceived stigmas toward mental illness were measured using the Depression Stigma Scale. Directors' self-efficacy (perceived level of knowledge and confidence) across 19 mental health topics was measured using a 3-point Likert scale. Analyses were conducted by generating descriptive statistics and performing Mann-Whitney U tests on the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median personal depression stigma score was 7.57 (SD = 8.02). Our analyses identified significantly higher personal depression stigma scores among men, FFA advisors, agricultural educators, and those lacking personal experience with mental illness. A lack of self-efficacy correlated significantly with increased personal stigma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the critical need for targeted educational interventions to reduce stigma among agricultural youth directors and enchance mental health literacy. Anti-stigma and mental health literacy initiatives are essential for fostering a supportive environment that encourages open discussions about mental health issues with youth within the agricultural community.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"80-94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142478764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hypertonic Saline Nasal Rinse Intervention: Immunomodulatory Effects in Dairy Workers. 高渗盐水鼻腔冲洗干预:乳制品工人的免疫调节效果。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2416425
Grant Erlandson, Sheryl Magzamen, Julia L Sharp, James Seidel, Jill A Poole, Mary Bradford, Joshua W Schaeffer

Objective: Increased risk of occupational exposure to bioaerosols has long been recognized in livestock operations including dairy facilities. Spanning the inhalable fraction (0-100 μm), dairy bioaerosols comprise a wide variety of inflammatory components that deposit in the nasopharyngeal region. The resultant inflammatory response from bioaerosol exposure is likely driving the increased prevalence of respiratory disease observed in dairy workers. It is also thought the microbiome of the upper respiratory system may help mediate this inflammation. We investigated the viability of a low-cost hypertonic saline nasal rinse intervention in modulating inflammatory responses in bioaerosol exposed dairy workers and its impact on microbial diversity.

Methods: Pre- and post-shift nasal rinses were administered and collected alongside full shift inhalable personal breathing zone (PBZ) samples for each participant for up to 5 consecutive days. Treatment group participants (n = 23) received hypertonic saline rinses while control group participants (n = 22) received normotonic saline rinses. Particulate matter (PM) and endotoxin concentrations were quantified from PBZ samples using gravimetric and enzymatic analytical methods, respectively. Pre- and post-shift rinses were analyzed for pro- and anti-inflammatory markers and microbial diversity using a multiplex assay and 16S rRNA sequencing, respectively.

Results: PM and endotoxin concentrations were comparable between groups indicating similar exposures. Post-shift pro-inflammatory markers were significantly higher than pre-shift for IL-13 (p = .047), IL-1β (p < .001), IL-6 (p < .001), IL-8 (p < .001), and TNF-α (p = .024). There was no evidence of a difference in log concentrations between intervention group or day among any of the measured inflammatory markers. Anti-inflammatory IL-10 concentrations increased across the 5 sample days, independent of treatment group suggesting tonicity may not be driving the change. However, this result was not significant (p = .217). Nasal microbiome alpha (within sample) and beta (between sample) diversity metrics did not differ significantly between group or day demonstrating no adverse washout intervention effects.

Conclusion: This study provided encouraging results that warrant future research to further evaluate saline nasal rinses as a workplace intervention.

目的:人们早已认识到,在包括乳制品设施在内的畜牧业中,职业暴露于生物气溶胶的风险越来越高。乳制品生物气溶胶的可吸入部分(0-100 μm)包括多种沉积在鼻咽部的炎症成分。接触生物气溶胶所产生的炎症反应很可能是导致乳制品工人呼吸道疾病发病率增加的原因。人们还认为,上呼吸道系统的微生物组可能有助于介导这种炎症反应。我们研究了一种低成本高渗盐水鼻腔冲洗干预措施在调节暴露于生物气溶胶的乳制品工人的炎症反应方面的可行性及其对微生物多样性的影响:方法: 对每名参与者进行班前和班后鼻腔冲洗,并收集其全班可吸入个人呼吸区(PBZ)样本,最多连续收集 5 天。治疗组参与者(n = 23)接受高渗盐水冲洗,对照组参与者(n = 22)接受常渗盐水冲洗。采用重量分析法和酶分析法分别对 PBZ 样品中的颗粒物质(PM)和内毒素浓度进行量化。使用多重检测法和 16S rRNA 测序法分别对班前和班后的冲洗液进行了促炎和抗炎标记物以及微生物多样性的分析:结果:各组之间的可吸入颗粒物和内毒素浓度相当,表明暴露情况相似。班后促炎标记物中的 IL-13 (p = .047)、IL-1β (p p p = .024)明显高于班前。没有证据表明不同干预组或不同日的炎症指标对数浓度存在差异。抗炎性 IL-10 的浓度在 5 个采样日中都有所上升,与治疗组无关,这表明补体可能不是导致这种变化的原因。不过,这一结果并不显著(p = .217)。鼻腔微生物组α(样本内)和β(样本间)多样性指标在不同组别或不同天之间没有显著差异,这表明冲洗干预没有不良影响:这项研究提供了令人鼓舞的结果,值得在今后的研究中进一步评估生理盐水鼻腔冲洗作为工作场所干预措施的效果。
{"title":"Hypertonic Saline Nasal Rinse Intervention: Immunomodulatory Effects in Dairy Workers.","authors":"Grant Erlandson, Sheryl Magzamen, Julia L Sharp, James Seidel, Jill A Poole, Mary Bradford, Joshua W Schaeffer","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2416425","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2416425","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Increased risk of occupational exposure to bioaerosols has long been recognized in livestock operations including dairy facilities. Spanning the inhalable fraction (0-100 μm), dairy bioaerosols comprise a wide variety of inflammatory components that deposit in the nasopharyngeal region. The resultant inflammatory response from bioaerosol exposure is likely driving the increased prevalence of respiratory disease observed in dairy workers. It is also thought the microbiome of the upper respiratory system may help mediate this inflammation. We investigated the viability of a low-cost hypertonic saline nasal rinse intervention in modulating inflammatory responses in bioaerosol exposed dairy workers and its impact on microbial diversity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre- and post-shift nasal rinses were administered and collected alongside full shift inhalable personal breathing zone (PBZ) samples for each participant for up to 5 consecutive days. Treatment group participants (<i>n</i> = 23) received hypertonic saline rinses while control group participants (<i>n</i> = 22) received normotonic saline rinses. Particulate matter (PM) and endotoxin concentrations were quantified from PBZ samples using gravimetric and enzymatic analytical methods, respectively. Pre- and post-shift rinses were analyzed for pro- and anti-inflammatory markers and microbial diversity using a multiplex assay and 16S rRNA sequencing, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PM and endotoxin concentrations were comparable between groups indicating similar exposures. Post-shift pro-inflammatory markers were significantly higher than pre-shift for IL-13 (<i>p</i> = .047), IL-1β (<i>p</i> < .001), IL-6 (<i>p</i> < .001), IL-8 (<i>p</i> < .001), and TNF-α (<i>p</i> = .024). There was no evidence of a difference in log concentrations between intervention group or day among any of the measured inflammatory markers. Anti-inflammatory IL-10 concentrations increased across the 5 sample days, independent of treatment group suggesting tonicity may not be driving the change. However, this result was not significant (<i>p</i> = .217). Nasal microbiome alpha (within sample) and beta (between sample) diversity metrics did not differ significantly between group or day demonstrating no adverse washout intervention effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provided encouraging results that warrant future research to further evaluate saline nasal rinses as a workplace intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"27-37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142511401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"The Source of All My Joy and All My Stress": Children and Childcare as Underappreciated Sources of Stress That Affect Farm Women. "我所有快乐和压力的源泉":孩子和育儿是影响农妇的未被重视的压力来源。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2427800
Florence Becot, Shoshanah Inwood, Hannah Budge

Objective: Women have always played a crucial role in agriculture through their work on the farm, caring for the family and the household, and off-farm employment. Yet, like their essential contributions to agriculture, their mental health and well-being have largely been invisible since much of the focus of the mental health in agriculture research has been on older, male farmers. This paper seeks to address this knowledge gap by focusing on the emotional consequences stemming from the expectations of juggling childcare responsibilities, farm work and managing the household whilst keeping children safe.

Methods: The data were collected via focus groups and photovoice activity with, respectively, 68 and 33 farm women from Ohio, Wisconsin, and Vermont.

Results: The content thematic analysis first indicates that the juggling of multiple roles along with limited support deeply impacted farm women's wellbeing. Worries that the children could get hurt was a major source of stress. Stress and mental health issues connected to children do not lessen as they age but rather shift and become more complex.

Conclusion: This article highlights the implications of the lack of investment in farm women's mental wellbeing and their lived realities of caring for children on the farm. Future research should address supply chain and affordability issues, particularly for rural childcare provision.

目标:妇女通过在农场工作、照顾家人和家庭以及在农场外就业,在农业中一直发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,与她们对农业做出的重要贡献一样,她们的心理健康和福祉在很大程度上也被忽视了,因为农业心理健康研究的重点大多是老年男性农民。本文试图弥补这一知识空白,重点关注在兼顾育儿责任、农活和家务的同时还要保证孩子安全的期望所产生的情绪后果:方法:通过焦点小组和摄影选择活动收集数据,对象分别是来自俄亥俄州、威斯康星州和佛蒙特州的 68 名和 33 名农妇:内容主题分析首先表明,兼顾多重角色和有限的支持深深地影响了农妇的福祉。担心孩子受到伤害是压力的主要来源。与子女有关的压力和心理健康问题并没有随着子女年龄的增长而减轻,反而有所变化,变得更加复杂:这篇文章强调了缺乏对农场妇女心理健康投资的影响,以及她们在农场照顾子女的生活现实。未来的研究应解决供应链和可负担性问题,尤其是农村儿童保育服务。
{"title":"\"The Source of All My Joy and All My Stress\": Children and Childcare as Underappreciated Sources of Stress That Affect Farm Women.","authors":"Florence Becot, Shoshanah Inwood, Hannah Budge","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2427800","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2427800","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Women have always played a crucial role in agriculture through their work on the farm, caring for the family and the household, and off-farm employment. Yet, like their essential contributions to agriculture, their mental health and well-being have largely been invisible since much of the focus of the mental health in agriculture research has been on older, male farmers. This paper seeks to address this knowledge gap by focusing on the emotional consequences stemming from the expectations of juggling childcare responsibilities, farm work and managing the household whilst keeping children safe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data were collected via focus groups and photovoice activity with, respectively, 68 and 33 farm women from Ohio, Wisconsin, and Vermont.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The content thematic analysis first indicates that the juggling of multiple roles along with limited support deeply impacted farm women's wellbeing. Worries that the children could get hurt was a major source of stress. Stress and mental health issues connected to children do not lessen as they age but rather shift and become more complex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This article highlights the implications of the lack of investment in farm women's mental wellbeing and their lived realities of caring for children on the farm. Future research should address supply chain and affordability issues, particularly for rural childcare provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"114-131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Journal of Agromedicine "Leader in the Field" 2025 S. Dee Jepsen. 农业医学杂志“领域领导者”2025 S.迪·杰普森。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2025.2435239
Scott Heiberger
{"title":"Journal of Agromedicine \"Leader in the Field\" 2025 S. Dee Jepsen.","authors":"Scott Heiberger","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2025.2435239","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2025.2435239","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"182-184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142773997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tensile Force Limits of the Sheep Spine: Comparison to Forces Required to Extricate Grain Entrapped Victims. 绵羊脊柱的拉伸力极限:与解救被谷物缠绕的受害者所需力量的比较。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-12 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2426491
Salah F Issa, Mahmoud S Issa, Eric Nauman, Carl Wassgren, Charles Schwab, Zahab S Ahsan, Mahmoud Nour, William Field

Objectives: Grain storage facility entrapments continue to be of concern in the agricultural industry, with nearly 1,500 documented incidents recorded over the last 45 years. Previous research studies have shown that attempting to extricate a full-size pulling test dummy from a grain mass requires a substantial amount of tensile or pull force - e.g. up to 1.32 kN if "buried" at waist depth, 2.77 kN at chest depth, and 4.01 kN at head depth. There is, however, a paucity of studies on the amount of distraction the human lumbar spine region can endure. The objective of this research study was to test the maximum tensile force that could be exerted on a sheep's spine (comparable to the human spine) before the intervertebral discs and surrounding ligament would show signs of failure.

Methods: Eight lumbar-region sheep spine segments were axially distracted using an MTS Criterion tensile testing machine, and the maximum forces were recorded.

Results: The average maximum force that the spinal discs and ligament withstood before showing signs of failure was 2.14 kN (standard deviation of 0.31 kN). This is comparable to the force required to extricate an individual entrapped in a grain mass at chest depth.

Conclusion: The authors recommend that grain entrapment victims should not be forcefully pulled out if buried to waist level or above due to two primary reasons: (1) the large variation in failure load observed in our experiment with sheep spines and (2) the lack of knowledge regarding the victim's pre-existing medical condition. The extractive forces required to remove a victim of entrapment in grain overlaps with the force needed to cause potential damage to the sheep spine, as the 1.7-3.0 kN range is comparable to the 1.65-2.48 kN force range that causes axial failure in the spine.

目标:谷物储藏设施的夹带事故一直是农业行业关注的问题,在过去 45 年中,记录在案的夹带事故有近 1,500 起。以往的研究表明,试图将全尺寸拉力测试假人从谷物堆中解救出来需要很大的拉力,例如,如果 "埋 "在腰部深度,拉力可达 1.32 千牛顿;埋在胸部深度,拉力可达 2.77 千牛顿;埋在头部深度,拉力可达 4.01 千牛顿。然而,有关人体腰椎区域所能承受的分心量的研究却很少。这项研究的目的是测试在椎间盘和周围韧带出现失效迹象之前,绵羊脊柱(与人类脊柱相当)所能承受的最大拉力:方法:使用 MTS Criterion 拉伸试验机对八节绵羊腰椎进行轴向拉伸,并记录最大拉力:结果:椎间盘和韧带在出现失效迹象前所承受的平均最大力为 2.14 千牛(标准偏差为 0.31 千牛)。这与在胸部深度将被谷物团困住的人解救出来所需的力量相当:作者建议,如果谷物被困者被埋至腰部或以上,则不应强行将其拉出,主要原因有两个:(1) 在我们用绵羊脊骨进行的实验中观察到的破坏载荷变化很大;(2) 对受害者之前的身体状况缺乏了解。移除谷物中的被困者所需的拔出力与对绵羊脊柱造成潜在损害所需的拔出力重合,因为 1.7-3.0 千牛顿的拔出力范围与导致脊柱轴向破坏的 1.65-2.48 千牛顿拔出力范围相当。
{"title":"Tensile Force Limits of the Sheep Spine: Comparison to Forces Required to Extricate Grain Entrapped Victims.","authors":"Salah F Issa, Mahmoud S Issa, Eric Nauman, Carl Wassgren, Charles Schwab, Zahab S Ahsan, Mahmoud Nour, William Field","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2426491","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2426491","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Grain storage facility entrapments continue to be of concern in the agricultural industry, with nearly 1,500 documented incidents recorded over the last 45 years. Previous research studies have shown that attempting to extricate a full-size pulling test dummy from a grain mass requires a substantial amount of tensile or pull force - e.g. up to 1.32 kN if \"buried\" at waist depth, 2.77 kN at chest depth, and 4.01 kN at head depth. There is, however, a paucity of studies on the amount of distraction the human lumbar spine region can endure. The objective of this research study was to test the maximum tensile force that could be exerted on a sheep's spine (comparable to the human spine) before the intervertebral discs and surrounding ligament would show signs of failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight lumbar-region sheep spine segments were axially distracted using an MTS Criterion tensile testing machine, and the maximum forces were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average maximum force that the spinal discs and ligament withstood before showing signs of failure was 2.14 kN (standard deviation of 0.31 kN). This is comparable to the force required to extricate an individual entrapped in a grain mass at chest depth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The authors recommend that grain entrapment victims should not be forcefully pulled out if buried to waist level or above due to two primary reasons: (1) the large variation in failure load observed in our experiment with sheep spines and (2) the lack of knowledge regarding the victim's pre-existing medical condition. The extractive forces required to remove a victim of entrapment in grain overlaps with the force needed to cause potential damage to the sheep spine, as the 1.7-3.0 kN range is comparable to the 1.65-2.48 kN force range that causes axial failure in the spine.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"49-56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Protective Factors of Suicide in Agriculture: A Global Scoping Review. 农业自杀的保护因素:全球范围审查。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2426500
Nathan Dawes, Richard C Franklin

Introduction: Each year, over 700,000 people die by suicide worldwide, and far more attempt and are impacted by the outcome. Agriculture is one of the most dangerous industries in which to work; it is also exposed to a lot of external stressors, such as climatic conditions, market forces (both input and output) and government regulation, as well as internal such as employment and of staff, multiple skills required and isolation. These stressors contribute to the higher rate of farm suicide cases. While there is growing evidence of the protective circumstances (factors) that protect against suicide and suicidality, more needs to be done in the agricultural sector.

Objective: To review global literature and consolidate the current knowledge regarding protective factors against suicide and suicidality in agricultural communities and elucidate the implications of these findings.

Method: A systematic scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Sc). A range of databases was searched for the terms "suicide*" or "suicidal behavior", "suicide attempt", or "suicidal ideation", or "suicidality", and "farm*" or 'agricultural worker*' or 'rancher*' and 'protective factors' or protect". Paper included had to be peer reviewed in English, include people living, working in or with agriculture or lived in an agricultural area.

Results: Fourteen studies met the study criteria, predominately (72%) from the United States of America and Australia. Four (29%) articles discussed individual coping mechanisms and self-reliance as protective factors against suicide and suicidality, while six (43%) described the influence of social support and perceived sense of belonging on suicide risk. Five (36%) papers examined the association between health-promoting and suicide-prevention initiatives as protective factors in agricultural communities.

Conclusion: There is limited, however, growing literature about protective factors for the prevention of suicide in agriculture; however, it is skewed to high-income countries. This review demonstrates a link between the development of individual coping skills as a protective factor against suicide in agricultural communities, with a primary focus on farming occupations within this setting. Social support was found to help reduce suicide risk by increasing a sense of belonging. These need to be exploited to drive down suicide rates.

导言:每年,全世界有 70 多万人死于自杀,还有更多的人试图自杀并因此受到影响。农业是最危险的行业之一;它还面临着许多外部压力,如气候条件、市场力量(包括投入和产出)和政府监管,以及内部压力,如员工的就业、所需的多种技能和与世隔绝。这些压力因素导致农场自杀率较高。虽然越来越多的证据表明,保护性环境(因素)可防止自杀和自杀倾向,但在农业部门还需要做更多的工作:综述全球文献,整合有关农业社区自杀和自杀倾向保护因素的现有知识,并阐明这些发现的意义:方法:按照系统性范围界定综述首选报告项目(PRISMA-Sc)进行系统性范围界定综述。以 "自杀*"或 "自杀行为"、"自杀未遂 "或 "自杀意念 "或 "自杀倾向"、"农场*"或 "农业工人*"或 "牧场主*"以及 "保护因素 "或 "保护 "为关键词,对一系列数据库进行了检索。收录的论文必须是经同行评审的英文论文,论文中必须包括在农业领域生活、工作或与农业相关的人员,或居住在农业地区的人员:有 14 项研究符合研究标准,主要(72%)来自美国和澳大利亚。四篇(29%)文章讨论了个人应对机制和自立是自杀和自杀倾向的保护因素,六篇(43%)文章描述了社会支持和归属感对自杀风险的影响。五篇(36%)文章研究了促进健康和预防自杀的措施作为农业社区保护因素之间的关联:有关预防农业自杀的保护性因素的文献有限,但在不断增加;不过,这些文献主要集中在高收入国家。本综述表明,个人应对技能的发展是农业社区预防自杀的保护因素,这两者之间存在联系,主要关注的是农业环境中的农业职业。研究发现,社会支持有助于通过增强归属感来降低自杀风险。需要利用这些因素来降低自杀率。
{"title":"The Protective Factors of Suicide in Agriculture: A Global Scoping Review.","authors":"Nathan Dawes, Richard C Franklin","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2426500","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2426500","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Each year, over 700,000 people die by suicide worldwide, and far more attempt and are impacted by the outcome. Agriculture is one of the most dangerous industries in which to work; it is also exposed to a lot of external stressors, such as climatic conditions, market forces (both input and output) and government regulation, as well as internal such as employment and of staff, multiple skills required and isolation. These stressors contribute to the higher rate of farm suicide cases. While there is growing evidence of the protective circumstances (factors) that protect against suicide and suicidality, more needs to be done in the agricultural sector.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review global literature and consolidate the current knowledge regarding protective factors against suicide and suicidality in agricultural communities and elucidate the implications of these findings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Sc). A range of databases was searched for the terms \"suicide*\" or \"suicidal behavior\", \"suicide attempt\", or \"suicidal ideation\", or \"suicidality\", and \"farm*\" or 'agricultural worker*' or 'rancher*' and 'protective factors' or protect\". Paper included had to be peer reviewed in English, include people living, working in or with agriculture or lived in an agricultural area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies met the study criteria, predominately (72%) from the United States of America and Australia. Four (29%) articles discussed individual coping mechanisms and self-reliance as protective factors against suicide and suicidality, while six (43%) described the influence of social support and perceived sense of belonging on suicide risk. Five (36%) papers examined the association between health-promoting and suicide-prevention initiatives as protective factors in agricultural communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is limited, however, growing literature about protective factors for the prevention of suicide in agriculture; however, it is skewed to high-income countries. This review demonstrates a link between the development of individual coping skills as a protective factor against suicide in agricultural communities, with a primary focus on farming occupations within this setting. Social support was found to help reduce suicide risk by increasing a sense of belonging. These need to be exploited to drive down suicide rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"165-181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142669353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Occupational Exposure to Pesticides, Personal Protection, and Willingness to Reduce Chemical Sprayings Among Iranian Greenhouse Farmers. 伊朗温室农民的农药职业接触、个人防护和减少化学喷洒的意愿。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2413086
Asghar Bagheri, Ziba Shirzadi, Ali Akbar Shokohian, Abolmohammad Bondori, Christos A Damalas

Objectives: The level of greenhouse farmers' personal protection in pesticide use and the possibility of environmental protection through farmers' willingness to reduce chemical sprayings were assessed in Khuzestan Province, Iran.

Methods: A survey of 80 active greenhouse vegetable growers was carried out in 2021 with face-to-face interviews. Willingness to reduce chemical sprayings was examined with the theory of planned behavior (TPB) model.

Results: Several intoxication symptoms were reported, with the most common symptom of pesticide intoxication being dizziness. Farmers showed unsafe or rather unsafe use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during pesticide handling. The maximum use of PPE pertained to the use of mask, spray clothing, and long-sleeved shirts. On a scale from 1 (= totally disagree) to 5 (= totally agree), the respondents showed negative attitudes towards reducing chemical sprayings (mean = 2.30), rather low levels of subjective norms (mean = 2.67), and rather low levels of perceived behavioral control over reduction of chemical sprayings (mean = 2.76). The TPB variables accounted for 73% of the variance in farmers' behavioral intention. Overall, farmers' behavioral intention to reduce chemical sprayings was almost neutral.

Conclusion: Increasing knowledge of the adverse effects of pesticides on health is necessary to promote safety behavior of farmers in the greenhouse.

目的评估伊朗胡齐斯坦省温室种植农户在使用农药时的个人防护水平,以及通过农户减少化学喷洒的意愿来保护环境的可能性:方法:2021 年,对 80 名活跃的温室蔬菜种植者进行了面对面访谈调查。采用计划行为理论(TPB)模型对减少化学喷洒的意愿进行了研究:结果:报告了几种中毒症状,其中最常见的农药中毒症状是头晕。在农药处理过程中,农民表现出不安全或相当不安全地使用个人防护设备(PPE)。使用最多的个人防护设备是口罩、喷雾服和长袖衬衫。在从 1(= 完全不同意)到 5(= 完全同意)的量表中,受访者对减少化学品喷洒表现出消极态度(平均值 = 2.30),主观规范水平相当低(平均值 = 2.67),对减少化学品喷洒的行为控制感知水平相当低(平均值 = 2.76)。TPB 变量占农民行为意向变异的 73%。总体而言,农民减少化学喷洒的行为意向几乎是中性的:结论:增加农药对健康不利影响的知识对于促进农民在温室中的安全行为是必要的。
{"title":"Occupational Exposure to Pesticides, Personal Protection, and Willingness to Reduce Chemical Sprayings Among Iranian Greenhouse Farmers.","authors":"Asghar Bagheri, Ziba Shirzadi, Ali Akbar Shokohian, Abolmohammad Bondori, Christos A Damalas","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2413086","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2413086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The level of greenhouse farmers' personal protection in pesticide use and the possibility of environmental protection through farmers' willingness to reduce chemical sprayings were assessed in Khuzestan Province, Iran.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of 80 active greenhouse vegetable growers was carried out in 2021 with face-to-face interviews. Willingness to reduce chemical sprayings was examined with the theory of planned behavior (TPB) model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several intoxication symptoms were reported, with the most common symptom of pesticide intoxication being dizziness. Farmers showed unsafe or rather unsafe use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during pesticide handling. The maximum use of PPE pertained to the use of mask, spray clothing, and long-sleeved shirts. On a scale from 1 (= totally disagree) to 5 (= totally agree), the respondents showed negative attitudes towards reducing chemical sprayings (mean = 2.30), rather low levels of subjective norms (mean = 2.67), and rather low levels of perceived behavioral control over reduction of chemical sprayings (mean = 2.76). The TPB variables accounted for 73% of the variance in farmers' behavioral intention. Overall, farmers' behavioral intention to reduce chemical sprayings was almost neutral.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increasing knowledge of the adverse effects of pesticides on health is necessary to promote safety behavior of farmers in the greenhouse.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"14-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142394617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Mixed Methods Assessment of an Online Mental Health and Resilience Program for Agricultural Sector Students. 针对农业部门学生的在线心理健康和复原力课程的混合方法评估。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2421982
Jorie Knook, Nicky Stanley-Clarke, Robbie Maris, Amanda Hay, Chris Andrews, Louise Winder

Financial, environmental, and socio-cultural challenges affect the mental health and wellbeing of those working and living on-farm. Education programs can help in improving mental health and overall wellbeing, but most of these programs are offered to established farmers in a face-to-face format, leading to a gap in offerings to many subgroups, including young agricultural entrants. To address these gaps, this paper assesses the value of an online mental health and resilience education program for young agricultural entrants. An explanatory sequential mixed methods approach was applied. Firstly, a quantitative survey was conducted with 172 first year agricultural tertiary students, aged 18-20, to assess the knowledge and skills gained due to program participation. Regressions and propensity score matching were used to determine the effect of program participation. Subsequently, seven interviews were conducted with program participants to provide insights into their experiences of the program. Thematic coding was applied to analyze the qualitative data. Findings from the quantitative survey show a significant increase in mental health knowledge and skills amongst program participants compared to participants in the control group. The qualitative interviews show the ability to work through the material in their own time and space, creates a safe environment for online students. Other mechanisms contributing to learning are using "normal language", a peer voice in communicating wellbeing, and building on learnings in previous education. This paper addresses a gap in literature by being the first study to evaluate online mental health education for agricultural tertiary students. It provides educators and other program designers with valuable information for future program design to support the wellbeing of young agricultural workers.

金融、环境和社会文化方面的挑战影响着在农场工作和生活的人们的心理健康和幸福。教育计划有助于改善心理健康和整体福祉,但这些计划大多以面对面的形式提供给成熟的农民,导致向包括年轻农业新手在内的许多亚群体提供的教育计划存在缺口。为了弥补这些差距,本文评估了针对青年农业从业者的在线心理健康和抗逆力教育计划的价值。本文采用了一种解释性顺序混合方法。首先,对 172 名年龄在 18-20 岁之间的农业高等院校一年级学生进行了定量调查,以评估他们因参与该计划而获得的知识和技能。采用回归和倾向得分匹配法来确定项目参与的效果。随后,对项目参与者进行了七次访谈,以深入了解他们参与项目的经历。对定性数据进行了主题编码分析。定量调查结果显示,与对照组的参与者相比,计划参与者的心理健康知识和技能有了显著提高。定性访谈显示,能够在自己的时间和空间内学习材料,为在线学生创造了一个安全的环境。其他有助于学习的机制包括使用 "正常语言"、在交流健康方面的同伴声音,以及在以往教育的基础上继续学习。本文是第一份评估农业大专学生在线心理健康教育的研究报告,填补了文献空白。它为教育工作者和其他项目设计者提供了宝贵的信息,有助于未来的项目设计,为青年农业工人的健康提供支持。
{"title":"A Mixed Methods Assessment of an Online Mental Health and Resilience Program for Agricultural Sector Students.","authors":"Jorie Knook, Nicky Stanley-Clarke, Robbie Maris, Amanda Hay, Chris Andrews, Louise Winder","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2421982","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2421982","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Financial, environmental, and socio-cultural challenges affect the mental health and wellbeing of those working and living on-farm. Education programs can help in improving mental health and overall wellbeing, but most of these programs are offered to established farmers in a face-to-face format, leading to a gap in offerings to many subgroups, including young agricultural entrants. To address these gaps, this paper assesses the value of an online mental health and resilience education program for young agricultural entrants. An explanatory sequential mixed methods approach was applied. Firstly, a quantitative survey was conducted with 172 first year agricultural tertiary students, aged 18-20, to assess the knowledge and skills gained due to program participation. Regressions and propensity score matching were used to determine the effect of program participation. Subsequently, seven interviews were conducted with program participants to provide insights into their experiences of the program. Thematic coding was applied to analyze the qualitative data. Findings from the quantitative survey show a significant increase in mental health knowledge and skills amongst program participants compared to participants in the control group. The qualitative interviews show the ability to work through the material in their own time and space, creates a safe environment for online students. Other mechanisms contributing to learning are using \"normal language\", a peer voice in communicating wellbeing, and building on learnings in previous education. This paper addresses a gap in literature by being the first study to evaluate online mental health education for agricultural tertiary students. It provides educators and other program designers with valuable information for future program design to support the wellbeing of young agricultural workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"95-104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Depression, Anxiety, and Coping Strategies Among Farmworkers Exposed to Substance Use at Work. 暴露于工作中使用药物的农民工的抑郁、焦虑和应对策略》(Depression, Anxiety, and Coping Strategies Among Farmworkers Exposed to Substance Use at Work)。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2407384
Annie J Keeney, Dianne Ciro, Yu Meng, Laura Coco, Katherine Ekonomo

Objective: Migrant farmworkers are at an increased risk of experiencing high levels of stress, depression, anxiety, and problematic substance use. Farmworker behavioral health is a predominant concern for agricultural health and safety efforts. While substance use has been found to be a visible part of the work environment among farming populations, there is scarce information about how farmworkers who are exposed to substance use at work are impacted.

Methods: This exploratory assessment investigated the association between substance use exposure at work and migrant farmworkers' (N = 58) symptoms of depression, anxiety, and coping strategies used. Univariate, bivariate, and regression analyses were conducted to examine data from a survey administered to migrant farmworkers in Southern California's Riverside and Imperial Valley counties.

Results: Exposure to substance use at work was significantly associated with farmworkers reporting more severe symptoms of anxiety (p = .018). We also found that anxiety among farmworkers was significantly related to their experiences of sexual harassment (p = .026), being called names or insulted (p = .05), feeling unsafe (p = .005), having an increased work burden (p = .001), and caring for a colleague (p = .001). Furthermore, as exposure to substance use at work increased, farmworkers reported more severe symptoms of depression (F (1,45) = 7.90, p = .007) and anxiety (F (1,45) = 16.743, p = .001). To cope, the farmworkers in our sample reported using emotion-focused coping strategies most often.

Conclusions: Substance use exposure at work can affect migrant farmworker health and safety. Addressing and supporting the behavioral health of the entire farming community is warranted.

目标:外来务农者面临更大的压力、抑郁、焦虑和使用问题药物的风险。农民工的行为健康是农业健康和安全工作的主要关注点。虽然在农业人口的工作环境中,药物使用已被发现是一个明显的组成部分,但有关在工作中接触到药物使用的农民工如何受到影响的信息却很少:这项探索性评估调查了工作中接触药物与农民工(58 人)的抑郁症状、焦虑症状和所使用的应对策略之间的关系。通过对南加州河滨县和帝王谷县的外来务农者进行调查,对数据进行了单变量、双变量和回归分析:在工作中接触药物与农民工报告更严重的焦虑症状明显相关(p = .018)。我们还发现,农民工的焦虑与他们遭受性骚扰(p = .026)、被辱骂或侮辱(p = .05)、感到不安全(p = .005)、工作负担加重(p = .001)和照顾同事(p = .001)的经历有很大关系。此外,随着工作中使用药物的风险增加,农民工报告的抑郁症状(F (1,45) = 7.90,p = .007)和焦虑症状(F (1,45) = 16.743,p = .001)也更加严重。为了应对这些问题,样本中的农民工最常使用的是以情绪为中心的应对策略:结论:在工作中接触药物会影响农民工的健康和安全。有必要解决并支持整个农业社区的行为健康问题。
{"title":"Depression, Anxiety, and Coping Strategies Among Farmworkers Exposed to Substance Use at Work.","authors":"Annie J Keeney, Dianne Ciro, Yu Meng, Laura Coco, Katherine Ekonomo","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2407384","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2407384","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Migrant farmworkers are at an increased risk of experiencing high levels of stress, depression, anxiety, and problematic substance use. Farmworker behavioral health is a predominant concern for agricultural health and safety efforts. While substance use has been found to be a visible part of the work environment among farming populations, there is scarce information about how farmworkers who are exposed to substance use at work are impacted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This exploratory assessment investigated the association between substance use exposure at work and migrant farmworkers' (<i>N</i> = 58) symptoms of depression, anxiety, and coping strategies used. Univariate, bivariate, and regression analyses were conducted to examine data from a survey administered to migrant farmworkers in Southern California's Riverside and Imperial Valley counties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exposure to substance use at work was significantly associated with farmworkers reporting more severe symptoms of anxiety (<i>p</i> = .018). We also found that anxiety among farmworkers was significantly related to their experiences of sexual harassment (<i>p</i> = .026), being called names or insulted (<i>p</i> = .05), feeling unsafe (<i>p</i> = .005), having an increased work burden (<i>p</i> = .001), and caring for a colleague (<i>p</i> = .001). Furthermore, as exposure to substance use at work increased, farmworkers reported more severe symptoms of depression (F (1,45) = 7.90, <i>p</i> = .007) and anxiety (F (1,45) = 16.743, <i>p</i> = .001). To cope, the farmworkers in our sample reported using emotion-focused coping strategies most often.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Substance use exposure at work can affect migrant farmworker health and safety. Addressing and supporting the behavioral health of the entire farming community is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"105-113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142308886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Promoting Workplace Health, Safety, and Well-Being Among Essential Agricultural Workers Through Vaccine-Preventable Infectious Diseases Training in the Rio Grande Valley. 通过在格兰德河谷开展疫苗可预防传染病培训,促进基本农业工人的工作场所健康、安全和福祉。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-13 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2421249
Anabel Rodriguez, David I Douphrate, Ana L Pineda Reyes, Susana Zavala, Andrea V Cabrera Cruz, Maria D Alegria, Brian Ukaegbu, Annie J Keeney, Brenda Berumen-Flucker, Eva M Shipp, Shannon P Guillot-Wright, Maria E Fernandez-Esquer, David Gimeno Ruiz de Porras

Introduction: Health, safety, and well-being training programs provide essential education on anticipating, identifying, and mitigating exposures like infectious diseases. Gaps in infectious diseases awareness and education became especially apparent during the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequently were exacerbated by mis- and disinformation.

Methods: Vaccine-preventable infectious diseases training (influenza, hepatitis A and B, and tetanus infections, including COVID-19) was developed, delivered, and evaluated among 1,043 farmworkers, bodega workers, and production management in the Rio Grande Valley using mobile-learning technologies. The Kirkpatrick Four-Level Training Evaluation Model was utilized to evaluate training satisfaction (Level 1), effectiveness (Level 2), and effect on behavior (Level 3).

Results: The mean score on the pretest before training was 67.8% (SD 17.5), and the mean score on the same test immediately after the video training was 77.2% (SD 17.9). A paired t-test revealed that knowledge improved significantly from pre- to post-training (p < .05). We observed a difference between mean pre- and post-test scores relative to the pooled standard deviation, resulting in an effect size estimate of 0.53 indicative of a medium learning effect.

Conclusion: There is no "silver bullet" for training migrating bodega and farmworkers. Our findings suggest that the utilization of m-learning techniques continues to be a successful mechanism for delivering health, safety, and well-being awareness training content to agricultural workers in remote and challenging work environments. There is a long overdue need for offline capable software with features that allow equitable access to training, even in remote farming regions.

导言:健康、安全和福利培训计划提供了有关预测、识别和减少传染病等暴露的基本教育。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,传染病意识和教育方面的差距变得尤为明显,随后,错误和虚假信息又加剧了这一差距:方法:利用移动学习技术,为里奥格兰德河谷的 1043 名农场工人、酒窖工人和生产管理人员开发、提供和评估了疫苗可预防传染病培训(流感、甲型和乙型肝炎、破伤风感染,包括 COVID-19)。柯克帕特里克四级培训评估模型用于评估培训的满意度(一级)、有效性(二级)和对行为的影响(三级):培训前的预测试平均得分率为 67.8%(标准差 17.5),视频培训后的预测试平均得分率为 77.2%(标准差 17.9)。配对 t 检验显示,从培训前到培训后,知识水平有了显著提高(p 结论:"没有什么'灵丹妙药'能解决所有问题":培训流动的酒窖工人和农民工没有 "灵丹妙药"。我们的研究结果表明,利用移动学习技术仍然是一种成功的机制,可以在偏远和具有挑战性的工作环境中为农业工人提供健康、安全和福利意识培训内容。即使是在偏远的农业地区,也早就需要具备离线功能的软件,使人们能够公平地获得培训。
{"title":"Promoting Workplace Health, Safety, and Well-Being Among Essential Agricultural Workers Through Vaccine-Preventable Infectious Diseases Training in the Rio Grande Valley.","authors":"Anabel Rodriguez, David I Douphrate, Ana L Pineda Reyes, Susana Zavala, Andrea V Cabrera Cruz, Maria D Alegria, Brian Ukaegbu, Annie J Keeney, Brenda Berumen-Flucker, Eva M Shipp, Shannon P Guillot-Wright, Maria E Fernandez-Esquer, David Gimeno Ruiz de Porras","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2421249","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2421249","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health, safety, and well-being training programs provide essential education on anticipating, identifying, and mitigating exposures like infectious diseases. Gaps in infectious diseases awareness and education became especially apparent during the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequently were exacerbated by mis- and disinformation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Vaccine-preventable infectious diseases training (influenza, hepatitis A and B, and tetanus infections, including COVID-19) was developed, delivered, and evaluated among 1,043 farmworkers, bodega workers, and production management in the Rio Grande Valley using mobile-learning technologies. The Kirkpatrick Four-Level Training Evaluation Model was utilized to evaluate training satisfaction (Level 1), effectiveness (Level 2), and effect on behavior (Level 3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean score on the pretest before training was 67.8% (SD 17.5), and the mean score on the same test immediately after the video training was 77.2% (SD 17.9). A paired t-test revealed that knowledge improved significantly from pre- to post-training (<i>p</i> < .05). We observed a difference between mean pre- and post-test scores relative to the pooled standard deviation, resulting in an effect size estimate of 0.53 indicative of a medium learning effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no \"silver bullet\" for training migrating bodega and farmworkers. Our findings suggest that the utilization of m-learning techniques continues to be a successful mechanism for delivering health, safety, and well-being awareness training content to agricultural workers in remote and challenging work environments. There is a long overdue need for offline capable software with features that allow equitable access to training, even in remote farming regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"57-67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Agromedicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1