首页 > 最新文献

BMC Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Effects of combined Triflow, deep breathing and coughing exercises on postoperative pulmonary function after mitral valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial. Triflow联合深呼吸和咳嗽练习对二尖瓣置换术后肺功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-026-03542-7
Naile Akıncı, Esra Eren

Background: Postoperative pulmonary complications remain a major cause of morbidity after cardiac valve surgery. Although incentive spirometry (Triflow) is routinely used in postoperative care, evidence regarding the additional benefits of combining Triflow with deep breathing and coughing exercises remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of combined Triflow, deep breathing, and coughing exercises on postoperative pulmonary function in adult patients undergoing mitral valve replacement.

Methods: This randomized controlled, single-blind trial was conducted between May and August 2025 in a private hospital in Istanbul. A total of 60 adult patients undergoing mitral valve replacement were randomly allocated to an experimental group (n = 30) or a control group (n = 30) using simple randomization. The experimental group performed Triflow combined with deep breathing and coughing exercises, while the control group performed Triflow alone.

Results: Postoperative SpO₂ levels were significantly higher in the experimental group at T1 (p = 0.009; 95% CI: 0.46-3.14), T2 (p < 0.001; 95% CI: 1.57-3.43), and T3 (p < 0.001; 95% CI: 2.72-4.54). The FEV₁/FVC ratio increased significantly in the experimental group compared with the control group at discharge (p < 0.001; 95% CI: 4.46-6.41). Respiratory rate was significantly higher in the experimental group at T1 (p < 0.001; 95% CI: 1.68-4.45), T2 (p < 0.001; 95% CI: 3.34-6.26), and T3 (p < 0.001; 95% CI: 5.23-8.37). Hematocrit levels were significantly lower in the experimental group at T1 (p = 0.039; 95% CI: -8.32 to - 0.24), T2 (p = 0.007; 95% CI: -8.29 to - 1.40), and T3 (p = 0.034; 95% CI: -6.54 to - 0.28). Pain scores were significantly lower in the experimental group at T1 (p < 0.001; 95% CI: -2.82 to - 1.71) and T2 (p < 0.001; 95% CI: -1.98 to - 1.08). Time to first mobilization was significantly shorter in the experimental group (p < 0.001; 95% CI: -2.94 to - 1.26). No postoperative pulmonary complications were observed in either group.

Conclusion: The combined application of Triflow, deep breathing, and coughing exercises was associated with significant improvements in postoperative pulmonary function, oxygen saturation, pain reduction, and earlier mobilization compared with Triflow alone in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement. These findings suggest that a structured, combined respiratory exercise protocol may provide additional clinical benefits in the early postoperative period.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06997224 (First registered on 15 May 2025).

背景:术后肺部并发症仍然是心脏瓣膜手术后发病的主要原因。尽管激励性肺活量测定法(Triflow)在术后护理中被常规使用,但关于将Triflow与深呼吸和咳嗽练习相结合的额外益处的证据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估Triflow联合深呼吸和咳嗽练习对二尖瓣置换术后成人患者肺功能的影响。方法:这项随机对照、单盲试验于2025年5月至8月在伊斯坦布尔一家私立医院进行。采用简单随机法将60例接受二尖瓣置换术的成人患者随机分为实验组(n = 30)和对照组(n = 30)。实验组采用Triflow联合深呼吸和咳嗽练习,对照组单独使用Triflow。结果:实验组术后SpO₂水平在T1 (p = 0.009; 95% CI: 0.46-3.14)和T2 (p)时均显著升高。结论:与单用Triflow相比,联合应用Triflow、深呼吸和咳嗽运动可显著改善二尖瓣置换术患者术后肺功能、氧饱和度、疼痛减轻和早期活动。这些发现表明,一个结构化的、联合的呼吸运动方案可能在术后早期提供额外的临床益处。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT06997224(首次注册于2025年5月15日)。
{"title":"Effects of combined Triflow, deep breathing and coughing exercises on postoperative pulmonary function after mitral valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Naile Akıncı, Esra Eren","doi":"10.1186/s12893-026-03542-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03542-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pulmonary complications remain a major cause of morbidity after cardiac valve surgery. Although incentive spirometry (Triflow) is routinely used in postoperative care, evidence regarding the additional benefits of combining Triflow with deep breathing and coughing exercises remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of combined Triflow, deep breathing, and coughing exercises on postoperative pulmonary function in adult patients undergoing mitral valve replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled, single-blind trial was conducted between May and August 2025 in a private hospital in Istanbul. A total of 60 adult patients undergoing mitral valve replacement were randomly allocated to an experimental group (n = 30) or a control group (n = 30) using simple randomization. The experimental group performed Triflow combined with deep breathing and coughing exercises, while the control group performed Triflow alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative SpO₂ levels were significantly higher in the experimental group at T1 (p = 0.009; 95% CI: 0.46-3.14), T2 (p < 0.001; 95% CI: 1.57-3.43), and T3 (p < 0.001; 95% CI: 2.72-4.54). The FEV₁/FVC ratio increased significantly in the experimental group compared with the control group at discharge (p < 0.001; 95% CI: 4.46-6.41). Respiratory rate was significantly higher in the experimental group at T1 (p < 0.001; 95% CI: 1.68-4.45), T2 (p < 0.001; 95% CI: 3.34-6.26), and T3 (p < 0.001; 95% CI: 5.23-8.37). Hematocrit levels were significantly lower in the experimental group at T1 (p = 0.039; 95% CI: -8.32 to - 0.24), T2 (p = 0.007; 95% CI: -8.29 to - 1.40), and T3 (p = 0.034; 95% CI: -6.54 to - 0.28). Pain scores were significantly lower in the experimental group at T1 (p < 0.001; 95% CI: -2.82 to - 1.71) and T2 (p < 0.001; 95% CI: -1.98 to - 1.08). Time to first mobilization was significantly shorter in the experimental group (p < 0.001; 95% CI: -2.94 to - 1.26). No postoperative pulmonary complications were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined application of Triflow, deep breathing, and coughing exercises was associated with significant improvements in postoperative pulmonary function, oxygen saturation, pain reduction, and earlier mobilization compared with Triflow alone in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement. These findings suggest that a structured, combined respiratory exercise protocol may provide additional clinical benefits in the early postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06997224 (First registered on 15 May 2025).</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146159005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of novel double-needle puncture technique to the conventional TESSYS technique in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: enhanced efficiency and reduced radiation exposure. 新型双针穿刺技术与传统TESSYS技术在经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术中的比较:提高效率和减少辐射暴露。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-026-03584-x
Liu Bo, Li Zhicheng, Zhang Zhihai, Zhi Zhonggui
{"title":"Comparison of novel double-needle puncture technique to the conventional TESSYS technique in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: enhanced efficiency and reduced radiation exposure.","authors":"Liu Bo, Li Zhicheng, Zhang Zhihai, Zhi Zhonggui","doi":"10.1186/s12893-026-03584-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03584-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146158908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical and biomechanical outcomes of single-position anterior fixation in anterior lumbar interbody fusion. 腰椎前路椎间融合术单位前固定的临床和生物力学结果。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-026-03566-z
Mingquan Liu, Dapeng Feng, Xiaobing Yan, Mingdong Zhang, Zhengwei Li

Background: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is an effective treatment for lumbar degenerative diseases, but it usually requires combined posterior fixation. Currently, Currently, there is no high-strength fixation technique for single-position anterior approach. This study aimed to introduce L5 vertebral body screws combined with S1 vertebral body-pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) as a novel single-position anterior fixation technique for ALIF, and to evaluate its clinical and biomechanical outcomes.

Methods: Sixty-three patients with L5/S1 degenerative disease undergoing ALIF were divided into BPSF (n = 22) and posterior pedicle screw fixation (PPSF, n = 41) groups. Clinical outcomes, radiographic parameters, and complications were collected and compared between groups. Biomechanically, an adult lumbar spine model was used to simulate two ALIF fixation configurations under normal and osteoporotic conditions. Each construct was loaded with 500N compression and 10N·m torque to simulate flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Kinematic analyses included ROM, interbody cage stress, and fixation device strain.

Results: The BPSF group showed significantly shorter operative duration (152.5 min (127.5, 173.1) vs. 165.0 min (140.0, 262.5), less intraoperative blood loss (115.0 ± 56.9 ml vs. 160.0 ml (110.0, 222.5) mL), and lower postoperative low back pain scores (1.6 ± 0.8 vs. 2.2 ± 0.7) compared to the PPSF group. And there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in JOA improvement rate (49.9 ± 14.2% vs. 54.7 ± 18.1%), lumbar lordosis correction (6.9 ± 7.3° vs. 7.6 ± 7.1°), fusion rate (90.9% vs. 92.7%), or complication rate (27.3% vs. 19.5%). Biomechanically, BPSF reduced ROM during flexion (12% reduction) and axial rotation (63% reduction) compared to PPSF, with higher interbody cage stress but lower posterior fixation device stress under most loading conditions.

Conclusion: BPSF provides safe anterior fixation for ALIF, reducing operative time and early postoperative pain. Its biomechanical stability, especially in rotational resistance, supports it as an alternative to PPSF for L5/S1 fusion.

背景:腰椎前路椎体间融合术(ALIF)是治疗腰椎退行性疾病的有效方法,但通常需要联合后路固定。目前,尚无用于单体位前路入路的高强度固定技术。本研究旨在介绍L5椎体螺钉联合S1椎体椎弓根螺钉固定(BPSF)作为ALIF单位前路固定新技术,并评价其临床和生物力学效果。方法:63例L5/S1退行性疾病行ALIF的患者分为BPSF组(22例)和后路椎弓根螺钉固定组(41例)。收集两组临床结果、影像学参数和并发症并进行比较。生物力学方面,采用成人腰椎模型模拟正常和骨质疏松情况下的两种ALIF固定配置。每个构建体加载500N压缩和10N·m扭矩,模拟屈伸、侧向弯曲和轴向旋转。运动学分析包括ROM、椎间笼应力和固定装置应变。结果:与PPSF组相比,BPSF组手术时间明显缩短(152.5 min (127.5, 173.1) vs. 165.0 min(140.0, 262.5),术中出血量明显减少(115.0±56.9 ml vs. 160.0 ml (110.0, 222.5) ml),术后腰痛评分明显降低(1.6±0.8 vs. 2.2±0.7)。两组患者JOA改良率(49.9±14.2%比54.7±18.1%)、腰椎前凸矫正率(6.9±7.3°比7.6±7.1°)、融合率(90.9%比92.7%)、并发症发生率(27.3%比19.5%)差异无统计学意义。生物力学方面,与PPSF相比,BPSF在屈曲(减少12%)和轴向旋转(减少63%)时减少了ROM,在大多数负载条件下,BPSF具有较高的体间笼应力但较低的后路固定装置应力。结论:BPSF为ALIF提供了安全的前路固定,减少了手术时间和术后早期疼痛。它的生物力学稳定性,特别是在旋转阻力方面,支持它作为L5/S1融合的替代方案。
{"title":"Clinical and biomechanical outcomes of single-position anterior fixation in anterior lumbar interbody fusion.","authors":"Mingquan Liu, Dapeng Feng, Xiaobing Yan, Mingdong Zhang, Zhengwei Li","doi":"10.1186/s12893-026-03566-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03566-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is an effective treatment for lumbar degenerative diseases, but it usually requires combined posterior fixation. Currently, Currently, there is no high-strength fixation technique for single-position anterior approach. This study aimed to introduce L5 vertebral body screws combined with S1 vertebral body-pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) as a novel single-position anterior fixation technique for ALIF, and to evaluate its clinical and biomechanical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-three patients with L5/S1 degenerative disease undergoing ALIF were divided into BPSF (n = 22) and posterior pedicle screw fixation (PPSF, n = 41) groups. Clinical outcomes, radiographic parameters, and complications were collected and compared between groups. Biomechanically, an adult lumbar spine model was used to simulate two ALIF fixation configurations under normal and osteoporotic conditions. Each construct was loaded with 500N compression and 10N·m torque to simulate flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Kinematic analyses included ROM, interbody cage stress, and fixation device strain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BPSF group showed significantly shorter operative duration (152.5 min (127.5, 173.1) vs. 165.0 min (140.0, 262.5), less intraoperative blood loss (115.0 ± 56.9 ml vs. 160.0 ml (110.0, 222.5) mL), and lower postoperative low back pain scores (1.6 ± 0.8 vs. 2.2 ± 0.7) compared to the PPSF group. And there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in JOA improvement rate (49.9 ± 14.2% vs. 54.7 ± 18.1%), lumbar lordosis correction (6.9 ± 7.3° vs. 7.6 ± 7.1°), fusion rate (90.9% vs. 92.7%), or complication rate (27.3% vs. 19.5%). Biomechanically, BPSF reduced ROM during flexion (12% reduction) and axial rotation (63% reduction) compared to PPSF, with higher interbody cage stress but lower posterior fixation device stress under most loading conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BPSF provides safe anterior fixation for ALIF, reducing operative time and early postoperative pain. Its biomechanical stability, especially in rotational resistance, supports it as an alternative to PPSF for L5/S1 fusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146151098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of biliary pathogens and clinical characteristics in patients with biliary tract infections based on a history of biliary-enteric bypass: a single-center retrospective study. 基于胆道-肠旁路术的胆道感染患者的胆道病原体及临床特征分析:一项单中心回顾性研究
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-026-03582-z
Dongxue Geng, Jingjing Tao, Wenjie Gao, Yi Miao
{"title":"Analysis of biliary pathogens and clinical characteristics in patients with biliary tract infections based on a history of biliary-enteric bypass: a single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Dongxue Geng, Jingjing Tao, Wenjie Gao, Yi Miao","doi":"10.1186/s12893-026-03582-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03582-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146158897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic approach to proximal gastric cancer using wristed ArtiSential™ instruments: a comparative study of 145 laparoscopic gastrectomies. 腹腔镜下应用腕式器械治疗胃癌近端:145例腹腔镜胃切除术的比较研究。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-026-03575-y
Tomaz Jagric

Background: We compared the short- and long-term results of ArtiSential™-operated patients with a historic group of laparoscopic-operated patients.

Methods: A total of 145 patients were included (37 patients in the ArtiSential group and 108 patients in the Laparoscopic group).

Results: There were significantly more conversions in the Laparoscopic group compared to ArtiSential™ group (15.7% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.043). The procedure duration was significantly shorter in the ArtiSential™ group (240 ± 49 min vs. 277 ± 58 min; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative morbidity and mortality between groups (19.4% in the Lap group vs. 10.8% in the ArtiSential™ group). Multivariate analysis identified intraoperative blood loss (Beta 0.335; 95%CI: 21.774-58.616; p < 0.0001), tumor location (Beta - 0.518; 95%CI: -49 - -25.939; p < 0.0001) and the reconstruction with wristed instruments (Beta - 0.312; 95%CI: -52.261- -16.613; p < 0.0001) as significant predictors for duration of the surgery, while wristed instruments (Beta 0.247; 95%CI: 3.296-13.599; p = 0.001) and the UICC stage (Beta 0.375; 95%CI: 3.205-7.517; p < 0.0001) were significant predictors for the number of extracted lymph nodes. Perioperative chemotherapy (OR 3.521; 95%CI: 1.572-7.883; p = 0.002) and the use of wristed instruments (OR 4.018; 95%CI: 1.441-11.205; p = 0.008) were significant predictors for a complete number 10 lymph node station dissection.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that ArtiSential™ wristed instruments offer key benefits in the challenging proximal anastomosis, allowing safe operations on patients with proximal tumors without increasing morbidity or mortality risk.

背景:我们比较了ArtiSential™手术患者与历史上一组腹腔镜手术患者的短期和长期结果。方法:共纳入145例患者,其中手工组37例,腹腔镜组108例。结果:腹腔镜组的转换率明显高于ArtiSential组(15.7% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.043)。artiential™组的手术时间明显更短(240±49分钟vs 277±58分钟,p = 0.001)。两组术后发病率和死亡率无显著差异(Lap组19.4% vs. ArtiSential™组10.8%)。多因素分析发现术中出血(Beta 0.335; 95%CI: 21.774-58.616; p)结论:我们的研究结果表明,ArtiSential™腕式器械在具有挑战性的近端吻合中提供了关键优势,允许近端肿瘤患者安全手术,而不会增加发病率或死亡率风险。
{"title":"Laparoscopic approach to proximal gastric cancer using wristed ArtiSential™ instruments: a comparative study of 145 laparoscopic gastrectomies.","authors":"Tomaz Jagric","doi":"10.1186/s12893-026-03575-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03575-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We compared the short- and long-term results of ArtiSential™-operated patients with a historic group of laparoscopic-operated patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 145 patients were included (37 patients in the ArtiSential group and 108 patients in the Laparoscopic group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significantly more conversions in the Laparoscopic group compared to ArtiSential™ group (15.7% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.043). The procedure duration was significantly shorter in the ArtiSential™ group (240 ± 49 min vs. 277 ± 58 min; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative morbidity and mortality between groups (19.4% in the Lap group vs. 10.8% in the ArtiSential™ group). Multivariate analysis identified intraoperative blood loss (Beta 0.335; 95%CI: 21.774-58.616; p < 0.0001), tumor location (Beta - 0.518; 95%CI: -49 - -25.939; p < 0.0001) and the reconstruction with wristed instruments (Beta - 0.312; 95%CI: -52.261- -16.613; p < 0.0001) as significant predictors for duration of the surgery, while wristed instruments (Beta 0.247; 95%CI: 3.296-13.599; p = 0.001) and the UICC stage (Beta 0.375; 95%CI: 3.205-7.517; p < 0.0001) were significant predictors for the number of extracted lymph nodes. Perioperative chemotherapy (OR 3.521; 95%CI: 1.572-7.883; p = 0.002) and the use of wristed instruments (OR 4.018; 95%CI: 1.441-11.205; p = 0.008) were significant predictors for a complete number 10 lymph node station dissection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that ArtiSential™ wristed instruments offer key benefits in the challenging proximal anastomosis, allowing safe operations on patients with proximal tumors without increasing morbidity or mortality risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146158988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of risk factors for postoperative lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in liver transplant patients. 肝移植术后下肢深静脉血栓形成的危险因素分析。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-025-03378-7
Xiaoqing Zhang, Ruisi Ma, Jinghui Yan, Jiaxing Zhu, Jie Wei, Yanmin Shi, Yingying Wang
{"title":"Analysis of risk factors for postoperative lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in liver transplant patients.","authors":"Xiaoqing Zhang, Ruisi Ma, Jinghui Yan, Jiaxing Zhu, Jie Wei, Yanmin Shi, Yingying Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-03378-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03378-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146158880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of risk factors for recurrence in septated chronic subdural hematoma. 分离性慢性硬膜下血肿复发危险因素分析。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-09 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-026-03576-x
Xiaoliang Wang, Hongru Feng, Botao Ma, Si Qi, Hailong Du, Chao Zhang, Lei Zhao, Xiaosong Liu, Xiaomeng Liu, Gengshen Zhang, Jianliang Wu, Yaqing An, Yang Wu
{"title":"Analysis of risk factors for recurrence in septated chronic subdural hematoma.","authors":"Xiaoliang Wang, Hongru Feng, Botao Ma, Si Qi, Hailong Du, Chao Zhang, Lei Zhao, Xiaosong Liu, Xiaomeng Liu, Gengshen Zhang, Jianliang Wu, Yaqing An, Yang Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12893-026-03576-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03576-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146144312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ureteral versus appendiceal Mitrofanoff channels: a retrospective analysis of functional outcomes and complications. 输尿管与阑尾米特罗法诺夫通道:功能结局和并发症的回顾性分析。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-09 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-026-03492-0
Mohamed Mansy, Mostafa Kotb, Mohamed Abokandil, Amr Salama, Mohamed Gamal, Saber Waheeb, Mostafa Zain

Introduction: The Mitrofanoff principal entails creating a continent catheterizable channel, traditionally the appendix. In patients with nonfunctioning kidney, the ureter of this kidney can be an alternative This study aims to compare outcomes of ureter versus appendiceal Mitrofanoff channels (MCs).

Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent MC creation between January 2020 and June 2024 for patients with neurogenic bladder, exstrophy-epispadias complex, prune belly syndrome, or posterior urethral valves. Group A included patients who had a ureter as MC (n = 11), while Group B included those with an appendiceal MC (n = 33). Data on demographics, operative details, complications, and continence outcomes were collected and analyzed.

Results: Forty-four patients (Male patients = 24) were included, with a median age of 13.0 years (IQR 9.0-15.0) in Group A and 10.0 years (IQR 7.0-12.0) in Group B (p = 0.002). Myelomeningocele was the most common diagnosis in both groups. Bladder augmentation was performed in 81.8% of patients in each group, predominantly with ileo-cystoplasty. Satisfactory clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) without complications was achieved in 54.4% of Group A and 57.5% of Group B. Stomal stenosis occurred more frequently in Group B (18.2% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.003), while meatal granuloma was more common in Group A (27.3% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.043). Other complications included urine leakage, painful catheterization, catheterization difficulty, and intestinal obstruction, with no significant intergroup differences.

Conclusion: Ureter as an MC offers a valid option for continent urinary diversion, demonstrating comparable continence outcomes as compared to appendiceal MC. The ureter represents a feasible and reliable alternative conduit in patients with a nonfunctioning kidney.

引言:米特罗法诺夫原则需要创建一个大陆导管通道,传统上是阑尾。对于肾功能不全的患者,输尿管可以作为另一种选择。本研究旨在比较输尿管与阑尾米特罗法诺夫通道(MCs)的结果。患者和方法:我们回顾性分析了2020年1月至2024年6月期间接受MC创建的患者,这些患者包括神经源性膀胱、尿道外溢-上膈肌复合物、梅子腹综合征或后尿道瓣膜。A组为输尿管MC (n = 11), B组为阑尾MC (n = 33)。收集并分析了人口统计学、手术细节、并发症和尿失禁结果的数据。结果:纳入44例患者(男性24例),a组中位年龄13.0岁(IQR 9.0 ~ 15.0), B组中位年龄10.0岁(IQR 7.0 ~ 12.0) (p = 0.002)。髓脊膜膨出是两组中最常见的诊断。两组81.8%的患者行膀胱增强术,以回肠膀胱成形术为主。A组和B组分别有54.4%和57.5%的患者获得了满意的清洁间歇置管(CIC),无并发症。B组的口狭窄发生率更高(18.2%比9.1%,p = 0.003),而A组的金属肉芽肿发生率更高(27.3%比9.1%,p = 0.043)。其他并发症包括尿漏、置管疼痛、置管困难、肠梗阻,组间差异无统计学意义。结论:输尿管作为MC提供了一个有效的选择,与阑尾MC相比,显示出相当的节制效果。输尿管是肾功能不全患者可行和可靠的替代管道。
{"title":"Ureteral versus appendiceal Mitrofanoff channels: a retrospective analysis of functional outcomes and complications.","authors":"Mohamed Mansy, Mostafa Kotb, Mohamed Abokandil, Amr Salama, Mohamed Gamal, Saber Waheeb, Mostafa Zain","doi":"10.1186/s12893-026-03492-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03492-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Mitrofanoff principal entails creating a continent catheterizable channel, traditionally the appendix. In patients with nonfunctioning kidney, the ureter of this kidney can be an alternative This study aims to compare outcomes of ureter versus appendiceal Mitrofanoff channels (MCs).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent MC creation between January 2020 and June 2024 for patients with neurogenic bladder, exstrophy-epispadias complex, prune belly syndrome, or posterior urethral valves. Group A included patients who had a ureter as MC (n = 11), while Group B included those with an appendiceal MC (n = 33). Data on demographics, operative details, complications, and continence outcomes were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four patients (Male patients = 24) were included, with a median age of 13.0 years (IQR 9.0-15.0) in Group A and 10.0 years (IQR 7.0-12.0) in Group B (p = 0.002). Myelomeningocele was the most common diagnosis in both groups. Bladder augmentation was performed in 81.8% of patients in each group, predominantly with ileo-cystoplasty. Satisfactory clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) without complications was achieved in 54.4% of Group A and 57.5% of Group B. Stomal stenosis occurred more frequently in Group B (18.2% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.003), while meatal granuloma was more common in Group A (27.3% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.043). Other complications included urine leakage, painful catheterization, catheterization difficulty, and intestinal obstruction, with no significant intergroup differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ureter as an MC offers a valid option for continent urinary diversion, demonstrating comparable continence outcomes as compared to appendiceal MC. The ureter represents a feasible and reliable alternative conduit in patients with a nonfunctioning kidney.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146151180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does total omentectomy increase survival in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery? A retrospective study. 全网膜切除术能提高腹腔镜胃癌手术的生存率吗?回顾性研究。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-09 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-026-03533-8
Hüseyin Kocaaslan, Cengiz Ceylan, Fatih Sümer, Zeynep Kocaaslan, Cemalettin Aydın
{"title":"Does total omentectomy increase survival in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery? A retrospective study.","authors":"Hüseyin Kocaaslan, Cengiz Ceylan, Fatih Sümer, Zeynep Kocaaslan, Cemalettin Aydın","doi":"10.1186/s12893-026-03533-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03533-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146151103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
S1 vertebral Hounsfield Unit value independently predicts pedicle screw loosening after posterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. S1椎体Hounsfield单位值独立预测腰椎退行性疾病患者后路腰椎椎间融合术后椎弓根螺钉松动。
IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-09 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-026-03570-3
Han Ke, Minghui Liang, Yu Xi, Ruiyuan Chen, Congying Zou, Tianyi Wang, Aobo Wang, Ziqian Ma, Ning Fan, Shuo Yuan, Lei Zang
{"title":"S<sub>1</sub> vertebral Hounsfield Unit value independently predicts pedicle screw loosening after posterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases.","authors":"Han Ke, Minghui Liang, Yu Xi, Ruiyuan Chen, Congying Zou, Tianyi Wang, Aobo Wang, Ziqian Ma, Ning Fan, Shuo Yuan, Lei Zang","doi":"10.1186/s12893-026-03570-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03570-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146144357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
BMC Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1