American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology最新文献

Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore the subjective experiences of people with aphasia when communicating in the presence of various types of background noise. We hypothesized that (a) people with aphasia would report greater perceived effort and stress than controls when talking in noise, (b) perceived effort and stress would be greater in noise than silence, and (c) people with aphasia would describe more negative reactions to communicating in noise than controls.

Method: Eleven people with aphasia and 11 age- and gender-matched controls retold stories in a baseline silent condition and five background noise conditions (pink noise, cocktail party, monologue, one-sided phone call, and conversation) and rated their perceived effort and stress after each story. Participants then described their experience in a semistructured interview. Perceived effort and stress ratings were analyzed statistically using quantitative methods. Interview data were analyzed qualitatively.

Results: Quantitative findings showed that people with aphasia reported significantly greater perceived effort and stress than controls. Across groups, phone call, conversation, and monologue conditions were perceived as either more effortful or stressful than the silent baseline condition. Although both participant groups discussed cognitive and emotional challenges and strategies related to talking in noise, qualitative findings showed distinct difficulties for people with aphasia. Specifically, unlike controls, participants with aphasia mentioned difficulty ignoring background noise, decreased processing speed, fatigue, negative emotional reactions, deliberately focusing, slowing down/taking breaks, and consciously regulating their emotions.

Conclusions: Although aphasia therapy often occurs in quiet clinic environments, everyday communication does not. The increased perceived difficulty that people with aphasia have for coping with background noise should be acknowledged, and training should be designed to prepare people with aphasia to communicate in noisy environments.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27893445.

Purpose: This study had three objectives: (a) to verify if Grodzinsky et al.'s (1993) findings of worse comprehension of personal than reflexive pronouns can be replicated in a larger meta-analysis of individual participant data, (b) to examine if the heterogeneity found in the patterns of pronoun comprehension in agrammatism can be attributed to task effects, and (c) to evaluate the risk of bias in the reviewed studies.

Method: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic literature search was performed to identify studies examining the personal-reflexive pronoun dissociation in agrammatic comprehension. Seven studies met the search criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. For each participant, individual accuracy scores for the comprehension of personal and reflexive pronouns were extracted in addition to information on the study methods. Individual accuracy data were analyzed using the Fisher's exact test and the binomial test. The risk of bias in the studies was assessed using an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.

Results: The meta-analysis had three main findings: (a) The majority of the persons with agrammatic aphasia (89%) had no dissociation between the comprehension of personal and reflexive pronouns; (b) 8% revealed a pattern consistent with a neuropsychological dissociation, faring worse on the comprehension of personal than reflexive pronouns; and (c) 2% performed worse on reflexive than personal pronouns. The type of the task used affected pronoun comprehension accuracy and accounted for the heterogeneity in the patterns of pronoun comprehension attested across the different participants.

Conclusions: Taken together, the meta-analysis did not support a dissociation between personal and reflexive pronoun comprehension in agrammatic comprehension. When confirmed, the dissociation was driven by task effects. The clinical implications of these findings were discussed together with implications to minimize the risk of bias in future examinations of the topic.

Purpose: Writing can be completed by hand or by typing. Increasingly, functional and social activities are completed in the virtual domain, which often requires discourse level writing. Yet, there is a shortage of research on discourse writing in aphasia. The purpose of this study was to provide preliminary reference data for a sequential picture description task in writing by hand and typing for people with aphasia. Additionally, we examined individual modality differences when comparing handwritten and typed discourse.

Method: Fifteen people with mild-moderate aphasia participated in this study. They completed a sequential picture description task in handwriting and in typing. Discourse samples were coded for Correct Information Units (CIUs) and Complete Utterances. Measures of productivity were also evaluated (e.g., Total Words, Total Utterances). Participants completed a computer use questionnaire regarding their current and premorbid typing and computer use.

Results: Preliminary reference data are reported. No significant differences were found at the group level for the measures evaluated. At the individual level, there was evidence of a modality effect for seven participants who demonstrated differences in the proportion of CIUs.

Conclusions: Although preliminary, these findings suggest that, at the group level, the handwritten and typed discourse produced by people with mild-moderate aphasia is similar. However, at the individual level, there is potential for modality differences. Consistent patterns of premorbid computer use, difficulty ratings, and individual differences in writing modes were not identified for the participants who demonstrated a modality effect. However, there was preliminary evidence that poststroke handedness may contribute to modality differences exhibited by some participants, which should be explored in future research. Additionally, these reference data are preliminary and further research is required from a more heterogeneous group of people with aphasia and to better establish assessment practices for discourse writing.

Purpose: Acquired reading deficits, or alexia, affect a significant proportion of individuals with aphasia. We sought to improve treatment for alexia by targeting specific cognitive information-processing components critical to reading (i.e., phonology or semantics).

Method: To target either phonological or semantic processing, we administered two anomia treatments, phonomotor treatment (PMT) and semantic feature analysis, modified to include a focus on reading throughout the therapy. Chronic left-hemisphere stroke survivors (N = 5) completed one or two 60-hr treatment rounds. Based on predictions from a computational reading model, three participants received the treatment recommended for their specific reading challenges (e.g., PMT for phonological deficits), while two participants had the nonrecommended treatment first, followed by the recommended model-matched treatment. Changes in reading aloud accuracy and response times (RTs) from before to after treatment were examined as a function of matching treatment to the deficit profile, type of treatment, therapy round, and word characteristics.

Results: Participants' reading aloud accuracy improved after treatment relative to baseline with higher accuracy for high-frequency words and shorter words. After the first treatment round, participants' accuracy and RT improved, irrespective of whether treatment was matched to the deficit profile. Furthermore, participants who completed the second treatment round continued achieving accuracy gains. Following treatment, participants demonstrated enhanced reading efficiency and generalized improvements on the selected sections of the Woodcock Reading Mastery Test.

Conclusions: While larger studies are needed to test for the effects of matching treatment type to the deficit profile, we conclude that treatments targeting specific information-processing components can effectively improve reading. Doubling the treatment dose offers small but significant gains.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.26517319.

Purpose: This study explored the acceptability and impact of relationship-centered communication partner training (RC-CPT) in couples impacted by aphasia. In particular, couples considered whether discussing their relationship roles and responsibilities was important and relevant to the changes they desire. Preliminary quasi-experimental data regarding perceived communication confidence and the marriage relationship were also obtained.

Method: Three couples participated in RC-CPT across two sessions. Surveys were used to measure communication confidence and the marital relationship before and after participation in RC-CPT. The quantitative findings were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Couples also participated in a semistructured interview about the acceptability of RC-CPT during a third session. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using reflexive codebook analysis.

Results: Quantitative data indicated that participants generally maintained or improved self-rated accessibility, responsiveness, engagement, conflict resolution, and communication within their marriage after participating in RC-CPT. Additionally, individuals with aphasia demonstrated enhanced communication confidence scores. Qualitative analysis revealed three themes: (a) Impact on Communication, (b) Impact on Relationship, and (c) Impact on Psychosocial Well-Being. Feedback from participants regarding future development was also included.

Conclusions: The convergence of quantitative and qualitative data supports the conclusion that couples experienced positive changes in their communication, relationship, and psychosocial well-being during the intervention, suggesting that RC-CPT has the potential to positively impact both communicative and psychosocial effects of aphasia on couples. Moreover, this study highlights the promise of RC-CPT as a relationship-centered counseling tool, warranting further exploratory and experimental research.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25937383.

Purpose: The purpose of this viewpoint was to advocate for increased study of semantic memory ability in traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Method: We review modern conceptualizations of semantic memory and its neural correlates and discuss how common neuroanatomical and cognitive deficits in TBI place this population at an increased risk for semantic disruption. Building on discussions at the 2024 International Cognitive-Communication Disorders Conference, we offer possible explanations for how these disruptions may have been overlooked by our field and offer examples of how semantic memory has been studied in other populations as well as how this work may apply to TBI research.

Result: Semantic memory is critical for academic, vocational, and interpersonal outcomes. Yet, little is known about semantic memory in TBI beyond naming ability. By examining only surface forms of semantic memory, we may be missing a deeper disruption in semantic structure.

Conclusion: More in-depth examination of semantic memory promises to uncover underlying mechanisms of cognitive-communication disorders and new opportunities to develop more sensitive clinical measures of semantic memory impairment.

Purpose: Speech-language pathologists provide important services to people recovering from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), also called concussion, although they may be underutilized in outpatient care. Because health care providers face challenges in selecting assessments to efficiently describe patient needs, the purpose of this study was to describe factors related to patients receiving speech-language pathology services after mTBI, as well as how assessments predict amount of services received.

Method: In this retrospective chart review study, demographic factors, injury characteristics, and assessment scores were extracted from medical records of patients aged 14-65 years receiving services for recent (within 6 months) mTBI at an outpatient specialty clinic. The Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Standardized Assessment of Concussion, and a newly developed self-report measure of cognitive-communication function-the Cognitive-Communication Referral Indicator for Concussion (CCoRI-C)-were used as dependent variables to predict speech-language pathology service referral. For those referred, Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) scores were added as dependent variables predicting speech-language pathology dosage.

Results: A total of 132 patient charts met inclusion and exclusion criteria. In addition to CCoRI-C and PCSS symptoms, receiving imaging, being injured in a motor vehicle crash, experiencing loss of consciousness, and being of female sex were related to speech-language pathology referrals. Of the 77 patients referred for speech-language pathology care, higher CCoRI-C, PCSS, BRIEF, RBANS total, and RBANS visuospatial scores were associated with recommended speech-language pathology dosage. Only the CCoRI-C, BRIEF-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Behavioral Regulation, and BRIEF-A Metacognition were associated with actual number of speech-language pathology sessions attended.

Conclusions: Cognitive-communication symptoms and executive function may be important to planning speech-language pathology rehabilitative episodes of care for people with mTBI. Future work should continue to evaluate how assessments augment demographic and injury characteristics in decision making for both referral to and use of speech-language pathology services after mTBI.

Purpose: Evidence surrounding swallowing impairment in sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM) is based on nonstandardized and nonvalidated assessment methods. We investigated (a) IBM's impact on swallowing function and oral intake status using well-tested assessment frameworks; (b) changes in swallowing over time; and (c) age, sex, and swallowing impairment severity's influence on oral intake status.

Method: We conducted a secondary analysis of Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) data from 13 patients with IBM (seven females; M_age = 60.2 [±13.6] years) and 13 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. We compared MBSImP Overall Impression (OI), Oral Total (OT), Pharyngeal Total (PT), and FOIS scores between groups. Specific to the IBM cohort, we analyzed repeated OT and PT scores and calculated whether age, sex, and OT and PT scores predicted FOIS scores.

Results: The IBM cohort demonstrated poorer OI scores across six swallowing components than healthy controls (each p < .05). Unlike OT scores (p = .84), PT (p = .033) and FOIS (p < .001) scores were worse in the IBM cohort. Repeated OI scores revealed changes in three swallowing components (each p < .05), but repeated OT (p = .16) and PT (p = .30) scores did not significantly change. Age, sex, and OT and PT scores did not influence FOIS scores (each p > .05).

Conclusions: Pharyngeal impairments were most prominent in the IBM cohort, and their oral intake status was adversely affected. Our preliminary data showcase the application of robust assessment methods to investigate swallowing function in IBM, enhancing standardization and comparability across studies.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27165450.

Purpose: The current study is a Phase I clinical study with the goal of determining feasibility and the effectiveness of the Kaufman Speech to Language Protocol (K-SLP) for children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) and comorbidities. We hypothesized that K-SLP intervention would result in improved outcomes and maintenance of treatment effect at 3-4 months postintervention.

Method: Single-subject experimental design with multiple baselines across behaviors was replicated across a group of six children. Five out of six participants completed the study. The K-SLP intervention was administered in dyads four times a week for three consecutive weeks. Outcomes included assessment of word/syllable shapes, articulation accuracy, speech intelligibility, and functional communication. Treatment progress was measured through: (a) the administration of custom probe word lists and (b) assessments carried out at pretreatment, immediately following intervention and approximately 3-4 months after the study period.

Results: Four out of five participants demonstrated significant improvements to words targeted in treatment and three out of five generalized these to untreated words. Furthermore, three out of five participants showed immediate and clinically significant posttreatment improvements in speech intelligibility and functional outcomes, and this increased to four out of five participants at 3-4 months follow-up.

Conclusions: The study provides preliminary support for the effectiveness of the K-SLP program when delivered in dyads to children with CAS with comorbidities. The study replicates earlier findings and reaffirms the positive outcomes of K-SLP for children with CAS.

Purpose: This qualitative study explored the experiences of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in professional learning communities (PLCs) during a year-long virtual professional development (PD) opportunity using an implementation science (IS) framework in an urban public school district for dynamic assessment (DA) training. The DA presented in the PD was modified based on ongoing discussions with key stakeholders in the district, so that it could be reasonably implemented in clinical practice while preserving the integrity of the DA's purpose.

Method: SLPs in an urban district were trained virtually using DA over the course of the school year. PD topics focused on decreasing bias and incorporating evidence-based practice into SLP approaches to speech-language evaluations. The SLPs underwent three training sessions and three separate PLC sessions. The SLPs were assigned a series of case studies to complement PLC sessions. An IS framework informed each step of the PD and PLCs to ensure applicability and integration of the content. Of the 366 SLPs working in the district, 209 consented and filled out two questionnaires and three exit slips to gather information on their experiences with the DAs and PLC models.

Results: SLPs reported new insights into their practice, including changes in assessment practices, awareness of bias in assessment practices, and increased confidence in working with families during the evaluation process. Two additional themes emerged: increased collaboration and enhanced group problem-solving skills when working with peers in PLC groups, and expanded proficiencies and heightened skills when applying DA practices to evaluations. The two challenges faced by SLPs included time constraints and confidence in the mastery of DA.

Conclusion: This study offers an approach to shifting evaluation practices in large districts to incorporate more evidence-based approaches.