Child and Adolescent Mental Health最新文献

Socio-ecological factors are major determinants of poor mental health across the life span. These factors can lead to health inequalities, which refer to differences in the health of individuals or groups (Kirkbride et al., 2024). Health inequity “is a specific type of health inequality that denotes an unjust, avoidable, systematic and unnecessary difference in health” (Arcaya, Arcaya, & Subramanian, 2015). Among several intersecting social adversities, inequity is one of the most pervasive contributors to poor mental health across all regions (Venkatapuram & Marmot, 2023). Structural inequity creates institutional power structures that marginalise large sections of the population and concentrate resources in the hands of a small minority (Shim, Kho, & Murray-García, 2018). The world is now more prosperous than it has ever been, yet the world is witnessing more within country inequality with the vast majority of the world's resources in the hands of a small minority of individuals or regions (United Nations, 2020).

No ethical approval was required for these updates.

Children and adolescents around the globe have mental health and neurodevelopmental needs. However, no country or region of the world has found good solutions to meet these needs, which are often long-term and complex. Most child and adolescent mental health research comes from high-income, mostly English-speaking, contexts even though 95% of the world's children and adolescents live in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), where there is vast cultural, linguistic, and socio-economic diversity, with limited services and systems for child and adolescent mental health (CAMH). There is therefore both a ‘knowledge gap’ (more than 90% of all research represents less than 10% of the global population) and an ‘identification and treatment gap’ (fewer than 1 in 10 children in LMIC ever receive a diagnosis or any kind of treatment). The purpose of this editorial perspective was to consider the challenges of diversity, inclusion and equity in CAMH research around the globe, and to present some practical things we can all do to close these gaps and transform the global CAMH research agenda.

Over 1.8 billion people, about a quarter of the world's population live in the seven countries of South Asia: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. The population is characterized by a significant demographic youth bulge, with over 40% under the age of 18. This young population poses challenges related to ensuring their well-being and development. Issues such as poverty, undernutrition, lack of early stimulation, limited access to quality education and health care, and gender disparities persist in large parts of South Asia, affecting the lives of many children and adolescents. The promotion of child and adolescent mental health remains a challenge. Accumulating evidence suggests that early interventions can provide long-term health and socioeconomic benefits by prevention of the onset of mental health problems and their development into chronic disorders. This needs to be coupled with specialist services that can cater to the needs of children with greater needs, and support the community and schools-based non-specialist led services. Addressing child and adolescent mental health in South Asia presents a window of opportunity, because this regional youth bulge can contribute significantly to the global economy of the future.

The detection of psychosis and its prodrome have unique considerations in a child and adolescent population. Young people attending CAMHS are already a high-risk group, which confers significant limitations in applying the current clinical high-risk (CHR) model. This has catalysed calls for a transdiagnostic approach to psychosis risk prediction, but without a clear pathway forward. We contribute to the debate opened by Salazar de Pablo and Arango (2023, Child and Adolescent Mental Health) on the role of CAMHS in this initiative. CAMHS have a key role in developing comprehensive longitudinal datasets to inform risk models. Closer integration with early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services will be needed to realise this potential. This integration is also required to reliably detect prodromes and emerging psychosis in young people. Where there is robust evidence to support prevention initiatives, we should proceed with their implementation, even in the absence of enhanced risk models.

Anna-Kaisa, V., Virpi, K.-K., Mervi, R., Elisa, R., Terhi, L., Marjo, K., André, S. and Eila, K. (2022). Review: Economic evidence of preventive interventions for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents—A systematic review. Child Adolesc Ment Health, 27: 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12505

There is an error in the tagging of the first and last names in the byline. The byline should have been: Anna-Kaisa Vartiainen, Virpi Kuvaja-Köllner, Mervi Rantsi, Elisa Rissanen, Terhi Luntamo, Marjo Kurki, André Sourander, Eila Kankaanpää.

We apologize for the error.

Involuntary treatment has been reported to be traumatic, stigmatising and frightening, as well as sometimes lifesaving. However, there has been little research into the experiences of people who have been hospitalised involuntarily prior to the age of 18. A greater understanding of this may help us to make changes which could improve the experience of involuntary psychiatric treatment for children and young people. Lizzie Mitchell is an expert by experience who was admitted to a psychiatric hospital in England under the Mental Health Act (MHA) when she was 16 years old. Here, in discussion with Susan Walker, a child and adolescent psychiatrist, Lizzie reflects on her own experiences alongside wider reflections around the involuntary hospitalisation of young people, including the potential short and long-term impact on mental health, education, friendships, family and identity.