Pub Date : 2025-11-06DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101980
Stephanie Rennane, Zachary A Morris
Background: Disability is typically measured in surveys using functional limitation questions rather than asking respondents to self-identify as having a disability. Little is known about the characteristics of those who self-identify with a disability and how they compare with those identified via functional limitation questions.
Objective: To compare the prevalence and characteristics of people with disabilities measured by both functional and self-identification measures, and to assess the overlap between these populations.
Methods: Using nationally representative survey data from 2023, we conduct bivariate comparisons of demographic, health, functional characteristics and financial needs between populations captured by self-identification question, the Washington Group Short Set on Functioning (WG-SS) and the American Community Survey Six (ACS-6) Questions. We estimate a multivariable regression to explore predictors of self-identification.
Results: Adding a self-identification question doubles the population with disabilities relative to measuring disability with the WG-SS alone, and increases the population by 30 % relative to the ACS-6 alone. People who self identify are less likely to be female or Hispanic/Latinx, are in worse physical health and more likely to be LGBTQIA + compared to those identified only by functional measures. The group identified by both the self-identification and either functioning question set are in the worst health and are more likely to participate in disability programs.
Conclusion: Including a self-identification question in addition to functioning questions expands the prevalence of disability to varying degrees depending on which functional questions are used, but use of functioning and self-identification questions together enhances identification of the subgroup with highest needs.
{"title":"A comparative analysis of self-identification and functional measures of disability.","authors":"Stephanie Rennane, Zachary A Morris","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101980","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101980","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disability is typically measured in surveys using functional limitation questions rather than asking respondents to self-identify as having a disability. Little is known about the characteristics of those who self-identify with a disability and how they compare with those identified via functional limitation questions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the prevalence and characteristics of people with disabilities measured by both functional and self-identification measures, and to assess the overlap between these populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using nationally representative survey data from 2023, we conduct bivariate comparisons of demographic, health, functional characteristics and financial needs between populations captured by self-identification question, the Washington Group Short Set on Functioning (WG-SS) and the American Community Survey Six (ACS-6) Questions. We estimate a multivariable regression to explore predictors of self-identification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adding a self-identification question doubles the population with disabilities relative to measuring disability with the WG-SS alone, and increases the population by 30 % relative to the ACS-6 alone. People who self identify are less likely to be female or Hispanic/Latinx, are in worse physical health and more likely to be LGBTQIA + compared to those identified only by functional measures. The group identified by both the self-identification and either functioning question set are in the worst health and are more likely to participate in disability programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Including a self-identification question in addition to functioning questions expands the prevalence of disability to varying degrees depending on which functional questions are used, but use of functioning and self-identification questions together enhances identification of the subgroup with highest needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101980"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145524634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-06DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101979
Jonathan A Schulz, Aleksa Owen, Gilbert Gimm
Background: People with disabilities disproportionately use cannabis compared to those without a disability; however, little is known about reasons for use among people with disabilities.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and reasons for cannabis use among people with disabilities.
Methods: Data from Wave 5 (2023-2024) of the National Survey on Health and Disability (n = 1919), a national online survey of adults aged 18+ who self-identify as living with a disability, were used to estimate the prevalence and reasons for cannabis use among those with any disability and six self-reported limitations (cognitive, hearing, independent living, mobility, self-care, vision). Open-ended responses were analyzed using an inductive content analysis to create themes.
Results: The prevalence of current cannabis use among survey respondents was 21.9 % and people with cognitive disabilities reported the highest proportion (28.7 %). The most prevalent common reasons for current cannabis use across all domains were to help with pain (71.9 %) and to relax or relieve tension (60.2 %). Analysis of open-ended responses for cannabis use reasons yielded three main themes: medicinal reasons, contextual reasons, and primarily as sensory moderator. Specific medical reasons for using cannabis included assistance with health-related conditions such as migraines, nausea, muscle spasms, seizures, mental health concerns, and sleep disturbances.
Conclusions: Cannabis use is prevalent across disability domains and the majority of respondents note they use cannabis to help with pain and to relax or relieve tension. Findings highlight the need to monitor cannabis use for pain relief among this population.
{"title":"Reasons for cannabis use among adults with disabilities: Findings from the 2023-2024 National Survey on Health and Disabilities.","authors":"Jonathan A Schulz, Aleksa Owen, Gilbert Gimm","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101979","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101979","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with disabilities disproportionately use cannabis compared to those without a disability; however, little is known about reasons for use among people with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and reasons for cannabis use among people with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from Wave 5 (2023-2024) of the National Survey on Health and Disability (n = 1919), a national online survey of adults aged 18+ who self-identify as living with a disability, were used to estimate the prevalence and reasons for cannabis use among those with any disability and six self-reported limitations (cognitive, hearing, independent living, mobility, self-care, vision). Open-ended responses were analyzed using an inductive content analysis to create themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of current cannabis use among survey respondents was 21.9 % and people with cognitive disabilities reported the highest proportion (28.7 %). The most prevalent common reasons for current cannabis use across all domains were to help with pain (71.9 %) and to relax or relieve tension (60.2 %). Analysis of open-ended responses for cannabis use reasons yielded three main themes: medicinal reasons, contextual reasons, and primarily as sensory moderator. Specific medical reasons for using cannabis included assistance with health-related conditions such as migraines, nausea, muscle spasms, seizures, mental health concerns, and sleep disturbances.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cannabis use is prevalent across disability domains and the majority of respondents note they use cannabis to help with pain and to relax or relieve tension. Findings highlight the need to monitor cannabis use for pain relief among this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101979"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145524687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-05DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101977
Byungmo Ku, Hyeondon Moon, Hajin Lee, Bumcheol Kim, Seoungmo Lee
Background: Caring for children with disabilities can impose additional burdens that negatively affect caregivers' physical health. Although this issue has been widely studied, findings remain inconsistent.
Objective: This study aimed to examine differences in physical health between caregivers of children with and without disabilities through a systematic review and meta-analysis. A secondary aim was to explore whether specific factors moderated these differences.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. In the narrative synthesis, physical health differences between groups were manually compared. For the meta-analysis, outcomes were categorized as either Likert scale scores or odds ratios. Hedges' g was calculated for Likert-scale studies, while pooled odds ratios were computed for studies reporting odds ratios. Moderator variables included disability type, measurement type, parental age, and type of physical health outcome.
Results: Twenty-eight studies were included, yielding 36 independent groups. Of these, 30 reported significantly poorer physical health among caregivers of children with disabilities. A random-effects model (n = 9, k = 12) revealed a significant pooled effect size (g = -.38, p = .003, 95 % CI [-.63, -.13]). Another model (n = 8, k = 11) showed a significant pooled odds ratio (OR = 1.30, 95 % CI [1.05, 1.60], p < .001). Type of physical health significantly moderated the association, with musculoskeletal outcomes showing stronger effects (Q(1) = 3.61, p = .04).
Conclusions: Caregivers of children with disabilities consistently exhibit poorer physical health. Future research should identify mechanisms contributing to this disparity.
背景:照顾残疾儿童可能会带来额外负担,对照顾者的身体健康产生负面影响。尽管这一问题已被广泛研究,但研究结果仍不一致。目的:本研究旨在通过系统回顾和荟萃分析来研究残疾儿童和非残疾儿童的照顾者在身体健康方面的差异。第二个目的是探讨是否有特定因素缓和了这些差异。方法:按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行系统搜索。在叙事综合中,人工比较各组之间的身体健康差异。在荟萃分析中,结果被分类为李克特量表得分或优势比。对李克特量表研究计算对冲系数g,对报告比值比的研究计算合并比值比。调节变量包括残疾类型、测量类型、父母年龄和身体健康结果类型。结果:纳入28项研究,产生36个独立组。其中,30个报告残疾儿童照料者的身体健康状况明显较差。随机效应模型(n = 9, k = 12)显示合并效应显著(g = - 0.38, p = 0.003, 95% CI[- 0.63, - 0.13])。另一个模型(n = 8, k = 11)显示出显著的合并优势比(OR = 1.30, 95% CI [1.05, 1.60], p)。结论:残疾儿童的照料者始终表现出较差的身体健康状况。未来的研究应该确定造成这种差异的机制。
{"title":"Differences in physical health between caregivers of children with and without disabilities: A systematic review and meta analysis.","authors":"Byungmo Ku, Hyeondon Moon, Hajin Lee, Bumcheol Kim, Seoungmo Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101977","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101977","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Caring for children with disabilities can impose additional burdens that negatively affect caregivers' physical health. Although this issue has been widely studied, findings remain inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine differences in physical health between caregivers of children with and without disabilities through a systematic review and meta-analysis. A secondary aim was to explore whether specific factors moderated these differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. In the narrative synthesis, physical health differences between groups were manually compared. For the meta-analysis, outcomes were categorized as either Likert scale scores or odds ratios. Hedges' g was calculated for Likert-scale studies, while pooled odds ratios were computed for studies reporting odds ratios. Moderator variables included disability type, measurement type, parental age, and type of physical health outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies were included, yielding 36 independent groups. Of these, 30 reported significantly poorer physical health among caregivers of children with disabilities. A random-effects model (n = 9, k = 12) revealed a significant pooled effect size (g = -.38, p = .003, 95 % CI [-.63, -.13]). Another model (n = 8, k = 11) showed a significant pooled odds ratio (OR = 1.30, 95 % CI [1.05, 1.60], p < .001). Type of physical health significantly moderated the association, with musculoskeletal outcomes showing stronger effects (Q(1) = 3.61, p = .04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregivers of children with disabilities consistently exhibit poorer physical health. Future research should identify mechanisms contributing to this disparity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101977"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145497346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-28DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101975
Michael M. McKee MD, MPH (Professor,Director of MDisability,Co-Director of Center of Disability Health & Wellness,Co-Editor-in-Chief) , Monika Mitra (Co-Editors-in-Chief,Director,Nancy Lurie Marks Professor of Disability Policy)
{"title":"Healthcare's blind spot—why people with disabilities remain marginalized and overlooked","authors":"Michael M. McKee MD, MPH (Professor,Director of MDisability,Co-Director of Center of Disability Health & Wellness,Co-Editor-in-Chief) , Monika Mitra (Co-Editors-in-Chief,Director,Nancy Lurie Marks Professor of Disability Policy)","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101975","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101975","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"Article 101975"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145453272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-28DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101974
Elizabeth Skidmore, Carolyn Baum, Jessica Kersey, Emily Kringle, Kelsey Voltz-Poremba, Sular Gordon, Tina Harris, Heidi Fischer, Maureen Gecht, Michelle Furman, Joy Hammel
Background: Survivors of stroke report low levels of community and social participation, even years after stroke. ENGAGE is a community-based intervention that merges social learning, guided problem solving, and supervised practice to collaboratively identify, generate, and apply solutions to challenges with community and social participation after stroke.
Objective: We examined the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of ENGAGE and characterized within group changes in community and social participation outcomes.
Methods: Community-dwelling survivors of stroke, occupational therapy providers, and occupational therapy scientists partnered to co-design the essential and structural elements of ENGAGE, as well as to evaluate ENGAGE using a multi-site single-arm community-based phase 2a clinical trial design. The 6-week ENGAGE program was co-facilitated by survivors of stroke acting as peer mentors and occupational therapy provider through in-person (Phase I, 12 sessions) or virtual web conference meetings (Phase II, 9 sessions). Feasibility was assessed through participant retention, engagement, acceptability, satisfaction, and safety. Within group change was assessed through the PROMIS Ability to Participation in Social Roles and Activities Scale.
Results: Of the 42 participants providing consent, 38 were eligible, and 30 started the intervention program. Retention in the ENGAGE program was 90 % (n = 27). Of these, 85 % engaged actively, 87 % indicated very high satisfaction, and 0 % reported injuries or injurious falls. Participants achieved a medium within group effect size of change in community and social participation (d = 0.38, 95 % CI = -0.11, 0.94).
Conclusions: ENGAGE appears to be a feasible and promising intervention to promote improvements in community and social participation in community-dwelling survivors of stroke.
{"title":"Promoting community and social participation in chronic stroke: A pilot study of the ENGAGE intervention.","authors":"Elizabeth Skidmore, Carolyn Baum, Jessica Kersey, Emily Kringle, Kelsey Voltz-Poremba, Sular Gordon, Tina Harris, Heidi Fischer, Maureen Gecht, Michelle Furman, Joy Hammel","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101974","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101974","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survivors of stroke report low levels of community and social participation, even years after stroke. ENGAGE is a community-based intervention that merges social learning, guided problem solving, and supervised practice to collaboratively identify, generate, and apply solutions to challenges with community and social participation after stroke.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of ENGAGE and characterized within group changes in community and social participation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Community-dwelling survivors of stroke, occupational therapy providers, and occupational therapy scientists partnered to co-design the essential and structural elements of ENGAGE, as well as to evaluate ENGAGE using a multi-site single-arm community-based phase 2a clinical trial design. The 6-week ENGAGE program was co-facilitated by survivors of stroke acting as peer mentors and occupational therapy provider through in-person (Phase I, 12 sessions) or virtual web conference meetings (Phase II, 9 sessions). Feasibility was assessed through participant retention, engagement, acceptability, satisfaction, and safety. Within group change was assessed through the PROMIS Ability to Participation in Social Roles and Activities Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 42 participants providing consent, 38 were eligible, and 30 started the intervention program. Retention in the ENGAGE program was 90 % (n = 27). Of these, 85 % engaged actively, 87 % indicated very high satisfaction, and 0 % reported injuries or injurious falls. Participants achieved a medium within group effect size of change in community and social participation (d = 0.38, 95 % CI = -0.11, 0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ENGAGE appears to be a feasible and promising intervention to promote improvements in community and social participation in community-dwelling survivors of stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101974"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12643107/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145423313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-06DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101972
Hye Jin Nam, Han Nah Park, Sujin Lee, Gyeonga Kang, Ji Hye Shin, Bohye Kim, Ju Young Yoon
Background: Photovoice enables participants to document their lived realities through photography, fostering self-expression and deeper reflection.
Objective: Leveraging these strengths, this study aimed to systematically review Photovoice research involving people with disabilities to explore the lived experiences with health-promoting behaviors.
Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in July 2024 using multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Medline. The search process adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Quality appraisal was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program. Identified facilitators and barriers to health-promoting behaviors among individuals with disabilities were mapped onto the Socio-Ecological Model to provide a structured analysis.
Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. At individual level, nine facilitators and seven barriers were identified. The interpersonal level revealed three facilitators and two barriers, while the institutional level included two facilitators and one barrier. At the community level, four facilitators and four barriers were found. No relevant factors were identified at the policy level.
Conclusion: This study expands the existing literature on participatory research by systematically reviewing Photovoice studies that examine health-promoting behaviors among people with disabilities. By offering a comprehensive analysis of facilitators and barriers, this review enhances the understanding of lived experiences and informs future interventions aimed at fostering inclusive and supportive environments for health promotion.
{"title":"A systematic review of Photovoice studies on health-promoting behaviors among individuals with disabilities: Insights from the socio-ecological model.","authors":"Hye Jin Nam, Han Nah Park, Sujin Lee, Gyeonga Kang, Ji Hye Shin, Bohye Kim, Ju Young Yoon","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101972","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101972","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Photovoice enables participants to document their lived realities through photography, fostering self-expression and deeper reflection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Leveraging these strengths, this study aimed to systematically review Photovoice research involving people with disabilities to explore the lived experiences with health-promoting behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted in July 2024 using multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Medline. The search process adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Quality appraisal was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program. Identified facilitators and barriers to health-promoting behaviors among individuals with disabilities were mapped onto the Socio-Ecological Model to provide a structured analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. At individual level, nine facilitators and seven barriers were identified. The interpersonal level revealed three facilitators and two barriers, while the institutional level included two facilitators and one barrier. At the community level, four facilitators and four barriers were found. No relevant factors were identified at the policy level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study expands the existing literature on participatory research by systematically reviewing Photovoice studies that examine health-promoting behaviors among people with disabilities. By offering a comprehensive analysis of facilitators and barriers, this review enhances the understanding of lived experiences and informs future interventions aimed at fostering inclusive and supportive environments for health promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101972"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145276416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Long-term services and supports (LTSS) include various paid institutional and personal care, comprising nearly 28.3 % of Medicaid spending, with significant variability in home and community-based services (HCBS) eligibility across states.
Objective: To examine the impact of state of residence and HCBS spend on risk of institutional placement on a particularly vulnerable population, dual-eligible non-elderly adults with intellectual/developmental disabilities (IDD).
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine the hazard ratio of institutional placement based on Medicaid and Medicare data. We examined CMS Medicaid Analytic eXtract files with linked 2008-2012 Medicare data from California, Florida, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Eligible participants were 159,275 dual-eligible adults aged 18-to-64 years living in community settings who were continuously enrolled in Medicaid and had ICD-9 codes for ID in any inpatient, outpatient, or long-term encounter.
Results: Among study participants, 4.4 % (n = 6975) had an eventual institutional placement claim. Subjects with institutional placement were more likely to be older, female, sicker, and have more claims for acute, ambulatory, and short-term care. In both unadjusted and adjusted analysis, risk of institutional placement was highest among those living in Ohio (HR 1.86 [1.70-2.04], P < 0.0001) and California (HR 1.50 [1.37-1.64], P < 0.0001) compared to Florida. Risk was lower for every $10,000 increase in HCBS spend at baseline. Black, Hispanic, and Other subjects had lower risks than While subjects, CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that continued investments in HCBS and better access may decrease reliance on costly institutional care for non-elderly disabled adults who may need long-term care for decades.
背景:长期服务和支持(LTSS)包括各种有偿机构和个人护理,占医疗补助支出的近28.3%,各州在家庭和社区服务(HCBS)资格方面存在显著差异。目的:研究居住州和HCBS在机构安置风险方面的支出对特别弱势群体的影响,即具有智力/发育障碍(IDD)的双重资格的非老年人。方法:采用回顾性队列研究,以医疗补助和医疗保险数据为基础,确定机构安置的风险比。我们检查了CMS医疗补助分析提取文件与加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州、纽约州、俄亥俄州和宾夕法尼亚州相关的2008-2012年医疗保险数据。符合条件的参与者是159,275名年龄在18- 64岁的双重条件成年人,他们生活在社区环境中,持续参加医疗补助计划,并在任何住院、门诊或长期就诊中具有ICD-9 ID代码。结果:在研究参与者中,4.4% (n = 6975)有最终的机构安置要求。机构安置的受试者更有可能是老年人、女性、病情较重,并且对急性、门诊和短期护理有更多的要求。在未调整和调整的分析中,居住在俄亥俄州的人的机构安置风险最高(HR 1.86 [1.70-2.04], P
{"title":"State-based variations in risk of institutional placement among dually eligible non-elderly adults with intellectual / developmental disabilities.","authors":"Sophia Jan, Caren Steinway, Colleen Brensinger, Olivia Teng, Jack Chen, Qing Liu, Justine Shults","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101973","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101973","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term services and supports (LTSS) include various paid institutional and personal care, comprising nearly 28.3 % of Medicaid spending, with significant variability in home and community-based services (HCBS) eligibility across states.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the impact of state of residence and HCBS spend on risk of institutional placement on a particularly vulnerable population, dual-eligible non-elderly adults with intellectual/developmental disabilities (IDD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine the hazard ratio of institutional placement based on Medicaid and Medicare data. We examined CMS Medicaid Analytic eXtract files with linked 2008-2012 Medicare data from California, Florida, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Eligible participants were 159,275 dual-eligible adults aged 18-to-64 years living in community settings who were continuously enrolled in Medicaid and had ICD-9 codes for ID in any inpatient, outpatient, or long-term encounter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among study participants, 4.4 % (n = 6975) had an eventual institutional placement claim. Subjects with institutional placement were more likely to be older, female, sicker, and have more claims for acute, ambulatory, and short-term care. In both unadjusted and adjusted analysis, risk of institutional placement was highest among those living in Ohio (HR 1.86 [1.70-2.04], P < 0.0001) and California (HR 1.50 [1.37-1.64], P < 0.0001) compared to Florida. Risk was lower for every $10,000 increase in HCBS spend at baseline. Black, Hispanic, and Other subjects had lower risks than While subjects, CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that continued investments in HCBS and better access may decrease reliance on costly institutional care for non-elderly disabled adults who may need long-term care for decades.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101973"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145314040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Little is known about the longitudinal relationship between the prevalence of childhood medical conditions or disabilities (MCoD) lasting at least six months and associated excess healthcare costs to the public payer (Medicare).
Objective: To determine the additional federally funded Medicare costs for children who have a long-term medical condition or disability and to investigate whether these costs rise due to the recurring presence of the conditions over time.
Methods: This study utilised data from the nationally representative Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, comprising Birth (B) and Kindergarten (K) cohorts, involving 9,224 children. Based on Medicare data linkage, the analysis included 54,285 observations longitudinally. Generalised linear models with a log link and gamma distribution were employed to estimate the impact of childhood MCoD on Medicare costs over 14 years for the B cohort and 12 years for the K cohort. All models were adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and selected child medical characteristics.
Results: On average, children with long-term MCoD incurred excess Medicare costs ranging from A$494 to A$784 biennially, in the different age groups of 0-1 to 16-17 years, compared to children without such conditions. Nationally, this translates to an estimated total additional Medicare expenditure of A$313.0 million for a cohort of children from age 0-1 year to 16-17 years.
Conclusion: The findings highlight the significant excess public Medicare costs associated with childhood MCoD in Australia. These results will be beneficial for future cost-effectiveness analysis and for improving public health planning aimed at improving support for children with long-term medical conditions or disabilities.
{"title":"The excess Medicare costs of long-term medical condition or disability: A longitudinal population-based study of Australian children.","authors":"Kabir Ahmad, Rasheda Khanam, Byron Keating, Syed Afroz Keramat, Rubayyat Hashmi, Enamul Kabir, Hendrik Jürges","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101971","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101971","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known about the longitudinal relationship between the prevalence of childhood medical conditions or disabilities (MCoD) lasting at least six months and associated excess healthcare costs to the public payer (Medicare).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the additional federally funded Medicare costs for children who have a long-term medical condition or disability and to investigate whether these costs rise due to the recurring presence of the conditions over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilised data from the nationally representative Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, comprising Birth (B) and Kindergarten (K) cohorts, involving 9,224 children. Based on Medicare data linkage, the analysis included 54,285 observations longitudinally. Generalised linear models with a log link and gamma distribution were employed to estimate the impact of childhood MCoD on Medicare costs over 14 years for the B cohort and 12 years for the K cohort. All models were adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and selected child medical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, children with long-term MCoD incurred excess Medicare costs ranging from A$494 to A$784 biennially, in the different age groups of 0-1 to 16-17 years, compared to children without such conditions. Nationally, this translates to an estimated total additional Medicare expenditure of A$313.0 million for a cohort of children from age 0-1 year to 16-17 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the significant excess public Medicare costs associated with childhood MCoD in Australia. These results will be beneficial for future cost-effectiveness analysis and for improving public health planning aimed at improving support for children with long-term medical conditions or disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101971"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145309704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-29DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101970
Maggie Sheridan, Jensine Clark
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a lifelong condition that affects 1.5-3.4 per 1000 children worldwide. As they grow older, these children must transition from pediatric to adult healthcare services. This transition comes with stress and uncertainty for a population that is already at a higher risk of poor mental health. This paper discusses what is known about mental health in youth with CP and its impact on their transition within the medical system. It also uses a biopsycho-ecological framework to understand how transition impacts several domains of their life including family structure and social participation. Actionable guidance for medical providers and caregivers is given to promote a healthier transition process.
{"title":"Shifting perspectives: Mental health and transition to adulthood in youth with cerebral palsy.","authors":"Maggie Sheridan, Jensine Clark","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101970","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101970","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cerebral palsy (CP) is a lifelong condition that affects 1.5-3.4 per 1000 children worldwide. As they grow older, these children must transition from pediatric to adult healthcare services. This transition comes with stress and uncertainty for a population that is already at a higher risk of poor mental health. This paper discusses what is known about mental health in youth with CP and its impact on their transition within the medical system. It also uses a biopsycho-ecological framework to understand how transition impacts several domains of their life including family structure and social participation. Actionable guidance for medical providers and caregivers is given to promote a healthier transition process.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101970"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145309658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-29DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101969
Rachel Liu-Galvin , Frank A. Orlando , Arch G. Mainous
Background
Disabilities are prevalent and linked to a wide variety of functional limitations, while inflammation, a key factor in chronic disease development and progression, is not a screening or treatment target and is therefore very rarely detected. Understanding the association between disabilities and inflammation is essential to address potential risks in this vulnerable population.
Objective
To determine whether individuals with disabilities are more likely to have elevated inflammation compared to those without.
Methods
In this cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults in the 2021–2023 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, survey-weighted logistic regression examined the associations between disabilities and high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) levels. Adjusted models controlled for age, sex, race/ethnicity, poverty, health insurance, hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, rheumatoid arthritis, and smoking.
Results
Individuals with disabilities had higher odds of hs-CRP >3 mg/L (adjusted OR: 1.46, 95 % CI: 1.21–1.76) and >10 mg/L (adjusted OR: 1.61, 95 % CI: 1.17–2.22) compared to those without disabilities. Physical disabilities were significantly associated with hs-CRP >3 mg/L (adjusted OR: 1.61, 95 % CI: 1.26–2.07) and >10 mg/L (adjusted OR: 1.94, 95 % CI: 1.47–2.55). Mental disabilities were associated with elevated hs-CRP in unadjusted but not adjusted models.
Conclusions
Disabilities, particularly physical disabilities, are associated with elevated inflammation, which may reflect underlying biological processes, reduced mobility, or cumulative health burden. The increased burden of systemic inflammation among individuals with disabilities supports consideration of hs-CRP as a potential marker for identifying elevated health risk in this population.
{"title":"Association of disability and inflammation: Potential risks to a vulnerable population","authors":"Rachel Liu-Galvin , Frank A. Orlando , Arch G. Mainous","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101969","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101969","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Disabilities are prevalent and linked to a wide variety of functional limitations, while inflammation, a key factor in chronic disease development and progression, is not a screening or treatment target and is therefore very rarely detected. Understanding the association between disabilities and inflammation is essential to address potential risks in this vulnerable population.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine whether individuals with disabilities are more likely to have elevated inflammation compared to those without.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults in the 2021–2023 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, survey-weighted logistic regression examined the associations between disabilities and high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) levels. Adjusted models controlled for age, sex, race/ethnicity, poverty, health insurance, hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, rheumatoid arthritis, and smoking.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Individuals with disabilities had higher odds of hs-CRP >3 mg/L (adjusted OR: 1.46, 95 % CI: 1.21–1.76) and >10 mg/L (adjusted OR: 1.61, 95 % CI: 1.17–2.22) compared to those without disabilities. Physical disabilities were significantly associated with hs-CRP >3 mg/L (adjusted OR: 1.61, 95 % CI: 1.26–2.07) and >10 mg/L (adjusted OR: 1.94, 95 % CI: 1.47–2.55). Mental disabilities were associated with elevated hs-CRP in unadjusted but not adjusted models.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Disabilities, particularly physical disabilities, are associated with elevated inflammation, which may reflect underlying biological processes, reduced mobility, or cumulative health burden. The increased burden of systemic inflammation among individuals with disabilities supports consideration of hs-CRP as a potential marker for identifying elevated health risk in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"Article 101969"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145208116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}