首页 > 最新文献

Synthese最新文献

英文 中文
Unconscious transformative experience 无意识转化经验
1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI: 10.1007/s11229-023-04332-x
Sam Coleman, Barbara Gail Montero
{"title":"Unconscious transformative experience","authors":"Sam Coleman, Barbara Gail Montero","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04332-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04332-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49452,"journal":{"name":"Synthese","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136063111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are models our tools not our masters? 模型是我们的工具而不是我们的主人吗?
1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-10-08 DOI: 10.1007/s11229-023-04352-7
Caspar Jacobs
Abstract It is often claimed that one can avoid the kind of underdetermination that is a typical consequence of symmetries in physics by stipulating that symmetry-related models represent the same state of affairs (Leibniz Equivalence). But recent commentators (Dasgupta in Philos Perspect 25:115–160, 2011; Pooley in: Knox and Wilson (eds) The Routledge companion to the philosophy of physics, Routledge, Milton Park, 2021; Pooley and Read in Br J Philos Sci, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1086/718274 ; Teitel in J Philos 119:233–278, 2021) have responded that claims about the representational capacities of models are irrelevant to the issue of underdetermination, which concerns possible worlds themselves. In this paper I distinguish two versions of this objection: (1) that a theory’s formalism does not (fully) determine the space of physical possibilities, and (2) that the relevant notion of possibility is not physical possibility. I offer a refutation of each.
人们经常声称,通过规定与对称相关的模型代表相同的事物状态(莱布尼茨等价),可以避免物理学中对称性的典型后果——不确定性。但是最近的评论者(Dasgupta在Philos perspective 25:15 - 160, 2011;Pooley in: Knox and Wilson(编)The Routledge companion to physics, Routledge, Milton Park, 2021;《哲学科学学报》,2021,https://doi.org/10.1086/718274;Teitel在J Philos 119:233-278, 2021)中回应说,关于模型表征能力的主张与不确定问题无关,不确定问题涉及可能世界本身。在本文中,我区分了这一反对意见的两个版本:(1)理论的形式主义并不(完全)决定物理可能性的空间,(2)可能性的相关概念不是物理可能性。我对每一个都提出反驳。
{"title":"Are models our tools not our masters?","authors":"Caspar Jacobs","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04352-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04352-7","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract It is often claimed that one can avoid the kind of underdetermination that is a typical consequence of symmetries in physics by stipulating that symmetry-related models represent the same state of affairs (Leibniz Equivalence). But recent commentators (Dasgupta in Philos Perspect 25:115–160, 2011; Pooley in: Knox and Wilson (eds) The Routledge companion to the philosophy of physics, Routledge, Milton Park, 2021; Pooley and Read in Br J Philos Sci, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1086/718274 ; Teitel in J Philos 119:233–278, 2021) have responded that claims about the representational capacities of models are irrelevant to the issue of underdetermination, which concerns possible worlds themselves. In this paper I distinguish two versions of this objection: (1) that a theory’s formalism does not (fully) determine the space of physical possibilities, and (2) that the relevant notion of possibility is not physical possibility. I offer a refutation of each.","PeriodicalId":49452,"journal":{"name":"Synthese","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135197644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Evidence and the epistemic betterness 证据和认知的改进
1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-10-08 DOI: 10.1007/s11229-023-04350-9
Ilho Park
{"title":"Evidence and the epistemic betterness","authors":"Ilho Park","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04350-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04350-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49452,"journal":{"name":"Synthese","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135198621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ordinary undetached parts 普通未拆卸部件
1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-10-08 DOI: 10.1007/s11229-023-04343-8
Justin Mooney
{"title":"Ordinary undetached parts","authors":"Justin Mooney","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04343-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04343-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49452,"journal":{"name":"Synthese","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135197738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Compound powerful qualities: properties as compounds of distinct powers and qualities 复合强大的性质:作为不同的能力和性质的化合物的性质
1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-10-07 DOI: 10.1007/s11229-023-04339-4
Henry Taylor
Abstract This paper develops and defends a compound powerful qualities view of properties. According to this view, properties are essentially composed of distinct powerful and qualitative elements. First, I outline an argument for the compound powerful qualities view, based on the claim that it has the explanatory power of other views, without incurring their costs. Second, I argue that the view has the resources to explain how properties are individuated, by claiming that properties are partially individuated by their qualitative elements, and partially by their powerful elements. Third, I distinguish two versions of the view, one of which says that the qualitative and powerful are parts of properties, the other of which says that they are aspects of properties. I argue that the parthood view is the more parsimonious because it can avoid postulating a novel metaphysical relation. Fourth, I argue that the relation between the powerful and qualitative elements of a property is necessary, and lay out various viable options concerning what the relation might be, including grounding and primitivism.
摘要本文发展并捍卫了一种复合强质属性观。根据这种观点,属性本质上是由不同的、强大的和定性的元素组成的。首先,我概述了复合强大品质观点的一个论点,其基础是它具有其他观点的解释力,而不会招致它们的代价。其次,我认为这种观点有足够的资源来解释属性是如何个体化的,因为它声称属性部分是由它们的定性元素个体化的,部分是由它们的强大元素个体化的。第三,我区分了两种观点,一种认为定性的和强大的是属性的一部分,另一种认为它们是属性的方面。我认为亲子关系的观点更为简洁,因为它可以避免假设一种新的形而上学关系。第四,我认为一种属性的强大元素和定性元素之间的关系是必要的,并就这种关系可能是什么提出了各种可行的选择,包括基础主义和原始主义。
{"title":"Compound powerful qualities: properties as compounds of distinct powers and qualities","authors":"Henry Taylor","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04339-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04339-4","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper develops and defends a compound powerful qualities view of properties. According to this view, properties are essentially composed of distinct powerful and qualitative elements. First, I outline an argument for the compound powerful qualities view, based on the claim that it has the explanatory power of other views, without incurring their costs. Second, I argue that the view has the resources to explain how properties are individuated, by claiming that properties are partially individuated by their qualitative elements, and partially by their powerful elements. Third, I distinguish two versions of the view, one of which says that the qualitative and powerful are parts of properties, the other of which says that they are aspects of properties. I argue that the parthood view is the more parsimonious because it can avoid postulating a novel metaphysical relation. Fourth, I argue that the relation between the powerful and qualitative elements of a property is necessary, and lay out various viable options concerning what the relation might be, including grounding and primitivism.","PeriodicalId":49452,"journal":{"name":"Synthese","volume":"201 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135254982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Boundary objects, trading zones, and stigmergy: the social and the cognitive in science 边界对象、贸易区域与污名化:科学中的社会与认知
1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI: 10.1007/s11229-023-04340-x
Ric Sims
{"title":"Boundary objects, trading zones, and stigmergy: the social and the cognitive in science","authors":"Ric Sims","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04340-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04340-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49452,"journal":{"name":"Synthese","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134975186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dialetheism and distributed sorites 双神论和分布论
1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI: 10.1007/s11229-023-04346-5
Ben Blumson
{"title":"Dialetheism and distributed sorites","authors":"Ben Blumson","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04346-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04346-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49452,"journal":{"name":"Synthese","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135590732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Numbers as properties 数字作为属性
1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI: 10.1007/s11229-023-04330-z
Melisa Vivanco
{"title":"Numbers as properties","authors":"Melisa Vivanco","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04330-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04330-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49452,"journal":{"name":"Synthese","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135696491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Normativity of meaning: An inferentialist argument 意义的规范性:一个推理主义的论证
1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI: 10.1007/s11229-023-04262-8
Shuhei Shimamura, Tuomo Tiisala
Abstract This paper presents a new argument to defend the normativity of meaning, specifically the thesis that there are no meanings without norms. The argument starts from the observation inferentialists have emphasized that incompatibility relations between sentences are a necessary part of meaning as it is understood. We motivate this approach by showing that the standard normativist strategy in the literature, which is developed in terms of veridical reference that may swing free from the speaker’s understanding, violates the ought-implies-can principle, but ours does not. In addition, our approach is superior because, unlike the dominant approach, it can be extended from declarative sentences to non-representational uses of language. In this paper, however, we only formulate the argument for the base case that involves incompatibility relations between declarative sentences. The goal is not to derive norms from something that is not normative, but to explicate the distinctive type of normativity that is built into meaning as it is understood by language-users. The explication proceeds in two steps. (1) For any sentence s a speaker understands, there is another sentence s’ that is (and is understood by the speaker as) incompatible with s . (2) In virtue of understanding this incompatibility of meanings, she ought not to be committed to both s and s’ . This prohibition is not derived from instrumental practical reason, nor is it based on representational correctness, but its source is the incompatibility of meanings.
摘要本文提出了一种新的观点来捍卫意义的规范性,即没有规范就没有意义。论证从观察出发,推理主义者强调句子之间的不相容关系是理解意义的必要组成部分。我们通过展示文献中标准的规范主义策略来激发这种方法,这种策略是根据真实参考发展起来的,可能不受说话者理解的影响,违反了“应该-暗示-可以”原则,但我们的策略却没有。此外,与主流方法不同,我们的方法更优越,因为它可以从陈述句扩展到语言的非表征性使用。然而,在本文中,我们只制定了基本情况的论点,涉及陈述句之间的不相容关系。我们的目标不是要从不规范的事物中推导出规范,而是要解释语言使用者所理解的意义中内置的独特类型的规范性。解释分两个步骤进行。(1)对于说话者理解的任何句子s,都有另一个句子s '与s不相容(说话者也将其理解为)。(2)由于理解了这种意义上的不相容,她不应该同时对s和s负责。这种禁止不是来自工具实践理性,也不是基于表征正确性,但其来源是意义的不相容。
{"title":"Normativity of meaning: An inferentialist argument","authors":"Shuhei Shimamura, Tuomo Tiisala","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04262-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04262-8","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper presents a new argument to defend the normativity of meaning, specifically the thesis that there are no meanings without norms. The argument starts from the observation inferentialists have emphasized that incompatibility relations between sentences are a necessary part of meaning as it is understood. We motivate this approach by showing that the standard normativist strategy in the literature, which is developed in terms of veridical reference that may swing free from the speaker’s understanding, violates the ought-implies-can principle, but ours does not. In addition, our approach is superior because, unlike the dominant approach, it can be extended from declarative sentences to non-representational uses of language. In this paper, however, we only formulate the argument for the base case that involves incompatibility relations between declarative sentences. The goal is not to derive norms from something that is not normative, but to explicate the distinctive type of normativity that is built into meaning as it is understood by language-users. The explication proceeds in two steps. (1) For any sentence s a speaker understands, there is another sentence s’ that is (and is understood by the speaker as) incompatible with s . (2) In virtue of understanding this incompatibility of meanings, she ought not to be committed to both s and s’ . This prohibition is not derived from instrumental practical reason, nor is it based on representational correctness, but its source is the incompatibility of meanings.","PeriodicalId":49452,"journal":{"name":"Synthese","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135689543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of a quality assurance system in radiation oncology: A 12-year experience in a University Hospital. 放射肿瘤学质量保证系统的开发:一家大学医院 12 年的经验。
IF 1.3 1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-26 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_39_22
Wannapha Nobnop, Vicharn Lorvidhaya, Somsak Wanwilairat, Anirut Watcharawipha, Ekkasit Tharavichitkul, Wimrak Onchan, Somvilai Chakrabandhu, Pitchayaponne Klunklin, Bongkot Jia-Mahasap, Pooriwat Muangwong, Imjai Chitapanarux

Purpose: This study aimed to report 12 years of experience in the development of a quality assurance system in radiation oncology in a university hospital.

Material and methods: We developed the Quality Assurance Program in Radiation Oncology (QUAPRO) in 2008 to detect treatment deviation in the radiotherapy (RT) process with three steps of near-miss detection: simulation and prescription (primary check, PC), treatment planning (secondary check, SC), and treatment delivery process (tertiary check, TC). We transferred our paper-based medical records to electronic-based radiotherapy information systems (RTISs) in 2013. QUAPRO was completely integrated into RTIS in 2017. Since then, electronic-based incident reporting has been conducted. The program is called the Radiation Incident Learning System (RILS). The near-miss rates were compared during the three time periods: 2008-2012, 2013-2017, and 2017-2020.

Results: Five years of paper-based QUAPRO for 2008-2012 demonstrated a fluctuation in the checking ratio, with a gradually increasing rate of near misses of 3.5-19.7%. After electronic-based medical records were developed in 2013, the results revealed a dramatic increase from a rate of 2.7 to 4.2 in the number of checks per patient and achieved an increased rate of near misses of 24.7% for PC, SC, and TC. The rate of near misses gradually decreased to 5.3% after 2017 because of RT workflow improvement.

Conclusion: The analysis of 12 years in near-miss data reflected the effectiveness of our quality assurance program. The QUAPRO system can detect near-miss incidents in the whole RT workflow and illustrate the detection improvement when integrated into electronic-based medical records. Regular feedback and exploration of near-miss reporting are recommended for proper RT workflow improvement.

目的:本研究旨在报告一家大学医院开发放射肿瘤学质量保证系统的 12 年经验:我们于 2008 年制定了放射肿瘤学质量保证计划(QUAPRO),通过模拟和处方(一级检查,PC)、治疗计划(二级检查,SC)和治疗实施过程(三级检查,TC)三个步骤来检测放射治疗(RT)过程中的治疗偏差。2013 年,我们将纸质医疗记录转移到电子放射治疗信息系统(RTIS)。QUAPRO 于 2017 年完全集成到 RTIS 中。从那时起,我们开始进行基于电子的事故报告。该计划被称为辐射事故学习系统(RILS)。对 2008-2012 年、2013-2017 年和 2017-2020 年这三个时间段的险情发生率进行了比较:2008-2012年五年的纸质QUAPRO显示出检查率的波动,近失误率逐渐上升,为3.5%-19.7%。2013 年开发出电子病历后,结果显示每位患者的检查次数从 2.7 次急剧增加到 4.2 次,PC、SC 和 TC 的近失率增加了 24.7%。由于 RT 工作流程的改进,2017 年后近失率逐渐降至 5.3%:12年的近失误数据分析反映了我们质量保证计划的有效性。QUAPRO系统可以检测整个RT工作流程中的近失误事件,并说明在与电子病历整合后,检测效果有所改善。建议定期反馈和探索近错报告,以适当改进 RT 工作流程。
{"title":"Development of a quality assurance system in radiation oncology: A 12-year experience in a University Hospital.","authors":"Wannapha Nobnop, Vicharn Lorvidhaya, Somsak Wanwilairat, Anirut Watcharawipha, Ekkasit Tharavichitkul, Wimrak Onchan, Somvilai Chakrabandhu, Pitchayaponne Klunklin, Bongkot Jia-Mahasap, Pooriwat Muangwong, Imjai Chitapanarux","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_39_22","DOIUrl":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_39_22","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to report 12 years of experience in the development of a quality assurance system in radiation oncology in a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We developed the Quality Assurance Program in Radiation Oncology (QUAPRO) in 2008 to detect treatment deviation in the radiotherapy (RT) process with three steps of near-miss detection: simulation and prescription (primary check, PC), treatment planning (secondary check, SC), and treatment delivery process (tertiary check, TC). We transferred our paper-based medical records to electronic-based radiotherapy information systems (RTISs) in 2013. QUAPRO was completely integrated into RTIS in 2017. Since then, electronic-based incident reporting has been conducted. The program is called the Radiation Incident Learning System (RILS). The near-miss rates were compared during the three time periods: 2008-2012, 2013-2017, and 2017-2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five years of paper-based QUAPRO for 2008-2012 demonstrated a fluctuation in the checking ratio, with a gradually increasing rate of near misses of 3.5-19.7%. After electronic-based medical records were developed in 2013, the results revealed a dramatic increase from a rate of 2.7 to 4.2 in the number of checks per patient and achieved an increased rate of near misses of 24.7% for PC, SC, and TC. The rate of near misses gradually decreased to 5.3% after 2017 because of RT workflow improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis of 12 years in near-miss data reflected the effectiveness of our quality assurance program. The QUAPRO system can detect near-miss incidents in the whole RT workflow and illustrate the detection improvement when integrated into electronic-based medical records. Regular feedback and exploration of near-miss reporting are recommended for proper RT workflow improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":49452,"journal":{"name":"Synthese","volume":"186 1","pages":"1975-1981"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74175307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Synthese
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1