Social Neuroscience最新文献

Objective: Epilepsy is one of the chronic neurological diseases with high stigmatization due to the psychosocial problems caused by seizures. The study was conducted to examine the quality of life and stigma in people with epilepsy (PWE).

Method: The data of the descriptive and cross-sectional study were collected using the Personal Information Form, the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31), and the Stigma Scale for Epilepsy (SSE) and analyzed using the SPSS program.

Results: The study included 86 patients receiving outpatient treatment at the neurology outpatient clinic of a university hospital. The mean score of epilepsy patients in QOLIE-31 was 61.95 ± 22.68, while their mean score in the SSE was 74.67 ± 5.94. It was determined that gender, seizure type, antiepileptic drug regimen, and seizure time affected the quality of life in PWE, while educational status and seizure type affected stigma. It was determined that there was a significant relationship between the level of stigma and quality of life in epilepsy patients, and that their quality of life decreased as the level of stigma increased.

Conclusion: As a result, epilepsy negatively affects the quality of life of patients and causes stigma. Reducing stigma is effective in increasing the quality of life.

Despite increasing interest in the neural underpinnings of prosociality during childhood and adolescence, there is little convergence across studies of brain activations associated with prosocial behavior in developmental populations. Here, we build on 11 neuroimaging studies on prosocial behavior in developmental samples of average age between 8 and 17 years and conducted an Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analysis. We found clusters of significant spatial convergence across studies in the insulae, inferior frontal gyrus, middle cingulum, and the precentral gyrus. The cluster in the cingulate cortex, which existing literature associates with cognitive control, shows overlap with previous meta-analytical data on prosocial behavior in adults. This region may constitute a core neurocognitive mechanism underlying prosociality from childhood to adulthood.

Empathy plays a crucial role in determining how one understands others' emotional experiences and behavioral decisions. This study aimed to explore whether empathic concern affects the processing of self-related and charity-related outcome evaluations. In this study, participants performed gambling tasks for themselves and low- and high-empathy charities. The behavioral results showed that low-empathy charities had a significantly higher risk rate than the self, whereas there was no significant difference between low-and high-empathy charities. The event-related potential (ERP) results showed that the P300 valence difference (d-P300) of the self was significantly higher for high-empathy charitable activities than for low-empathy charitable activities, and the d-P300 of high-empathy charitable activities was significantly higher than that of low-empathy charitable activities. The P300 valence differences primarily originated from activation difference in the posterior mid-cingulate cortex (pMCC) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). The time-frequency analysis showed that positive outcomes induced greater β2 event-related desynchronization (ERD) amplitudes for high-empathy charitable activities compared to negative outcomes. These findings suggest that empathic concern increased the distinction between good and bad outcomes for charities and promoted greater cognitive effort allocation toward prosocial rewards. The d-P300 is closely linked to activations in the pMCC and mPFC.

The change in the educational model derived from the COVID-19 pandemic might have an impact on cognitive development, particularly on Executive Functions (EFs). The aim of this study was to explore cognitive performance in adolescents at two time points (12 and 14 years of age), before and after the pandemic restrictions. We also analyzed possible sex differences in the results. We evaluated EFs using the Neuropsychological Battery of Executive Functions and Frontal Lobes (BANFE-2), which includes four cognitive indices corresponding to specific cognitive functions and associated prefrontal areas: Orbitofrontal Cortex (OC index -OCI-), Anterior Prefrontal Cortex (APCI), Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DCI), and Prefrontal cortex as an index of global EFs (EFI). The ANOVA conducted to compare the evaluations before and after the pandemic revealed no significant pre-post-pandemic differences in any sex and in any BANFE-2 index, except for the OCI, in which post-pandemic performance was impaired in boys (pre and post mean score = 96.61 vs. 66.53), but not in girls (pre and post mean score = 93.55 vs. 95.0). Our findings are thus compatible with the idea of a different vulnerability to change in the educational model between sexes, and they also reveal which specific EFs may have been affected during the pandemic.

Social power is linked to approach and withdrawal motivational systems, with frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) in the electroencephalogram (EEG) potentially reflecting these tendencies. Higher left-frontal activity suggests approach, while lower levels indicate withdrawal. In this study, we used a novel within-subject design to explore how social power affects FAA. Twenty-five participants completed an episodic recall task inducing high or low social power, or a neutral condition, in random order. EEG alpha power (8-12 hz) was measured to calculate FAA indices for frontal and parietal-occipital regions and compared to resting-state asymmetry. Results showed a significant increase in left-hemispheric activity during high social power recall, affecting both frontal and non-frontal regions, compared to low power and control conditions. Low social power was associated with the least left hemispheric activity. These findings highlight strong effects of social power on brain systems related to approach and avoidance but challenge the notion that FAA is confined to frontal regions. The study enhances understanding of the neural mechanisms behind social power and underscores the value of within-subject designs and baseline measurements in studying neural activity related alpha asymmetry and social power.

Social hierarchy is a key determinant of behavior and individuals interact with others based on their social rank. Previous research has emphasized the role of the mPFC in learning social hierarchies. This study employed a social rank learning task alongside a modified version of the Ultimatum Game (UG) to investigate how individuals respond to monetary offers from different social ranks and whether the mPFC modulates these reactions. Our findings indicate that unfair offers are more likely to be rejected and offers made by individuals of lower social rank are more likely to be rejected compared to those from higher social rank. Additionally, men tend to respond quicker than women in the UG. Remarkably, participants who received tDCS over the mPFC demonstrated higher rejection rates and faster response times for offers of low-rank individuals, while the lower rejection rates and slower responses to offers from high-rank opponents. These results shed light on the neural mechanisms involved in social decision-making in competitive contexts. In particular, they reveal increased sensitivity of the mPFC to social ranks after electrical stimulation, which might be an evidence for its role in shaping decisions and reactions toward unfairness within the existing social hierarchies.

Social behavior is affected by social structure type, but how neural function changes with social type remains unclear. We investigated whether social group size affects social behaviors based on dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT) systems. Four-week-old male mice were housed under different social group sizes: one, two, four, and eight mice per cage (1mpc, 2mpc, 4mpc, 8mpc, respectively). After 4 weeks, social preference, social interaction, and forced swim tests were performed to test sociability and anxiety, respectively, followed by analysis of DA and 5-HT and their metabolites (3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid [DOPAC], 3-methoxytyramine [3-MT], norepinephrine, and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid [5-HIAA]). Social interactions and anxious behavior decreased with increased social group size. DA, 3-MT, and 5-HT levels decreased with increasing social group size, whereas DOPAC and 5-HIAA levels increased in the extended mesocorticolimbic system, including the dorsal striatum. Moreover, the increased social group size resulted in increased DOPAC/DA and 5-HIAA/5-HT ratios, accompanied by a decrease in the 3-MT/DA ratio within the extended mesocorticolimbic system. Linear regression analysis also revealed that social group size affects DA and 5-HT turnover. These suggest that social group size may influence behavior and monoamine levels, potentially contributing to DA- and 5-HT-related psychiatric disorders.

Despite its importance for daily social interactions, few studies have explored interindividual differences in the Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities of healthy adults. We used Children's False-Attribution (CFA), Children's False-Beliefs (CFB), and Belief-Desire Reasoning tasks, along with fMRI-based assessments, in a comparative analysis of ToM among primary school teachers (PST; n = 27), skilled in social interactions with children, and matched controls (MC; n = 24), who lacked such experience. PST demonstrated slower reaction times than MC in Adult and Child false-belief stories of CFB. However, no other behavioral differences between the groups and between-group differences were observed at the brain level. Both groups presented similar valence ratings for stories in the CFA. Notably, fMRI analysis revealed a group-by-condition interaction effect in the right lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). In PSTs, OFC activation decreased during negative false-attribution stories regarding children compared to stories related to adults, whereas MC demonstrated an opposite activation pattern. Between-group differences in right lateral OFC activity possibly signify a neural efficiency effect secondary to frequent social interactions of PSTs, unlike the MCs, with children in the working environment. These results underscore the significance of everyday social experiences in the functional plasticity of ToM networks.

Several studies showed a positive effect of stories on Theory of Mind (ToM) performance. The aim of the present exploratory study was to investigate whether and how a specific aspect of narrative, i.e., character perspective, modulates the brain activation in response to a ToM task and improve the accuracy. Fifty participants were divided in three groups based on the text assigned: first-person perspective group (1 G; n = 16), third-person perspective group (3 G; n = 18) and a scientific essay group (EG; n = 16). The electroencephalographic and behavioral responses to eyes expressions, taken from the "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test, were recorded pre-(T0) and post-(T1) reading task. The main results showed a greater N100 on left fronto-central electrodes and a greater P220-400 on right temporo-parietal electrodes in response to eye expressions at T1 compared to T0 in 3 G. A lower N220-400 was found on right fronto-central in response to eye expressions at T1 compared to T0 in 1 G and 3 G. The results suggest that, although reading first- and third-person stories modulates self-processes in a similar way, third-person stories involve an early stage of processing and a more extended neural network including anterior-posterior brain sites.

Neural reactions to others' pain are usually lower when the individual is of a different ethnicity than when they are of the same ethnicity. This suggests that empathy is not only an automatic phenomenon but also a motivated one. In the present study, we tested whether one's willingness to increase or decrease empathy would correspondingly increase or decrease the neural empathic response, as measured with electroencephalography (EEG), irrespective of ethnicity. In Study 1, participants were presented with pictures displaying painful or non-painful stimulations on an individual from a similar or different ethnic group. In Study 2, the procedure was relatively similar but employed a within-subject design and was conducted in two countries: Belgium and Rwanda. Overall, EEG results showed that participants successfully increased their neural response to the pain of others, irrespective of the others' ethnicity in Study 1. However, the within-subject design used in Study 2 revealed additional nuances, as we observed that participants increased their neural pain response selectively toward ingroup individuals. Our findings indicate that observing the pain of a single person, regardless of ethnicity, can heighten one's neural reaction. Yet, when both ingroup and outgroup members are present, the neural response intensifies only for ingroup members.